DOCSLIB.ORG

2019-01 20 Point Plan Issue14.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2019-01 20 Point Plan Issue14.Pdf Fleet Management Good Practice Guide – 20 Point Plan Issue 14 – January 2019 AMENDMENT RECORD Issue Dated Notes Section 2: MP code removed from Technical incident reasons 14 December 2018 table “701D” 14 December 2018 Inclusion of new Section 10: Managing Ageing Rolling Stock 14 December 2018 Sections new cover inserted 14 December 2018 General document sections restructure 14 December 2018 Gary Cooper’s foreword updated Fleet Management Good Practice Guide: Issue 14 - January 2019 ii Foreword Our customers’ needs have been consistent ever since the birth of the railway, whether they are passengers, or businesses that send freight by rail, and the message is simply: run my train on time. Meeting this need is a priority for all of us in rail, and the desire for on-time service delivery shows in the correlation between punctuality and customer satisfaction and, in turn, the correlation between customer satisfaction and rail businesses’ revenues. It is important therefore, for the industry and the country as well as customers that we run punctual trains. We have been failing to do this for too long. After improving performance every month from 2002 – 2011, we now repeatedly miss the punctuality levels that TOCs and NR Routes agree they will deliver. The reliability of the vehicles we operate is part of that under-delivery and we have to do better. In 2013, the fleet planned a national passenger fleet performance challenge of delivering 11 500 MTIN by March 2019, a 20% improvement in reliability over this five- year control period. The reality is that we are likely to deliver only 9 000 MTIN by then. The industry’s National Task Force (NTF) brings together TOCs, Network Rail, the DfT and the ORR with the purpose of agreeing and then delivering levels of punctuality that meet or exceed customers’ needs. At the time of writing, technical fleet failures cause 18% of all industry delays. With close to 7 000 new vehicles planned to come into service in the next three years we have to manage the risks to performance of their in-service introductions as well as continue to improve current fleet reliabilities if we are to reap the reputational benefit, and thereby financial rewards, for our businesses, customers and GB, on which their procurement is predicated. The 20 Point Plan is our practitioner-created guide to help businesses deliver improvements in their rolling stock performance through willingly sharing hard-earned knowledge. The continued evolution of the plan is a visible demonstration of the will that differing businesses have in collaborating to meet the challenge of providing reliable punctual journeys for customers, be they passengers or those consigning freight by rail. Its authority comes from the fact that what is shared is things that practitioners and experts have found to work in practice. Focusing on: improving entry into service reliability quickly, reducing technical events that cause delay, and using diagnostics to recover from failure faster are all necessary to meet customers’ needs on our increasingly busy railway. We face a bigger challenge than was posed by replacing Mk 1 fleets in the first years of the National Fleet Reliability Improvement Plan – but together that challenge was met. We need to meet this new challenge and ensure that fleet reliability improves through the period 2019-24. Gary Cooper Director, RDG Planning, Engineering and Operations Fleet Management Good Practice Guide: Issue 14 - January 2019 iii Meeting the Challenge The Fleet Reliability Focus Forum (ReFocus) was introduced by the Engineering Council in November 2010 and tasked with identifying best practice and sharing knowledge amongst rail industry partners such as TOCs, OEMs, RoSCos, Network Rail and others. This forum has made a very valuable contribution to fleet delivery over this time and continues to provide an evolutional good practice guide to support the industry. ReFocus captures knowledge through peer groups who are experts and this knowledge is then incorporated in the Fleet Management Good Practice Guide. ReFocus has developed new sections of the Guide and revised existing sections. Sharing knowledge and best practice ultimately allows TOCs and their partners to deliver a reliable and punctual service. However, the railway still faces many challenges. With the increase in demand and society’s expectations constantly evolving, it is attracting more and more customers and businesses. This creates significant challenges, with historic methods of delivering continuous improvement only able to provide marginal benefits. A more holistic view, covering not only the technical aspects but also the people and the culture, will need to be explored and set out in the Guide. This includes integrating new technology, data, people and processes to allow for more trains to run on an increasingly busy network. ReFocus has made real progress in tackling some of these problems by working with industry partners and not just on a fleet-centric basis. This allows us to comprehensively examine generic railway issues by working with operational colleagues and Network Rail, as well as other industry partners such as the OEMs and the RoSCos. This collaborative approach has enabled us to update the Fleet Management Good Practice Guide to reflect today’s thinking. ReFocus also takes a holistic view of society and cultural challenges in order to drive change. It looks at technology and innovations that allow new processes and practices to be developed and addresses the gaps where clear value can be added. This knowledge is used to inform other industry strategy groups, such as Fleet Challenge and RDG’s Supply Chain Forum, of gaps and shortfalls which may need addressing now or in the near future. Other industries face similar challenges to the railway with ever-increasing demand from users and the constant need to move forward and deliver a reliable and safe service. Benchmarking with other industries gives members opportunities to transfer knowledge and incorporate it within their own business. Mark Johnson Fleet Reliability Focus Forum Chairman Engineering Director, Southeastern Railway Fleet Management Good Practice Guide: Issue 14 - January 2019 iv Contents 1. Summary .......................................................................................................... viii 2. Common Reliability Data ...................................................................................... 2 3 Management for Improvement .......................................................................... 11 4 Seasonal Management ....................................................................................... 20 5. Train Preparation ............................................................................................... 32 6. Delivering the Service ........................................................................................ 38 7 The Depot .......................................................................................................... 45 8 On-Depot Fault Finding ...................................................................................... 53 9 The Vehicles ...................................................................................................... 62 10 Managing Ageing Rolling Stock ........................................................................... 71 11 The Infrastructure .............................................................................................. 83 12 Managing the Impact of Fleet Incidents on the Railway ....................................... 89 13 The Supply Chain ............................................................................................. 100 14 New Train Introduction .................................................................................... 107 15 No Fault Found Warranty Claims ...................................................................... 121 16 ROSCOs ........................................................................................................... 128 17 Overhaul Management .................................................................................... 141 18 Outsourced Maintenance ................................................................................. 155 19 Business Continuity Management .................................................................... 162 20 Useful Links ..................................................................................................... 168 Appendix A - Evidence Flow Chart ................................................................................ 170 Appendix B – High-Performing Depot Specification ....................................................... 171 Fleet Management Good Practice Guide: Issue 14 - January 2019 v Appendix C - Supply Chain Sub-Group Issues List ........................................................... 176 Appendix D –Industry Supply Chain Workstreams ......................................................... 179 Appendix E – Examples of Best Practice Supply Chain Management .............................. 184 Appendix F - Fleet Transfer Checklist ............................................................................ 187 Appendix G - Incident Decision Support Tool Customer Requirement Specification ........ 192 Appendix H – Example of a Checklist ............................................................................ 195 Appendix I - Decision Support Tools .............................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Schedule 8 Recalibration for CP6: Phase 1 Monitoring Point
    www.pwc.co.uk Schedule 8 Recalibration for CP6: Phase 1 Monitoring Point Weights (MPWs) Prepared for Rail Delivery Group (RDG) and Cancellation November 2017 Minutes (CMs) Contents 1 Introduction 3 1.1 Context 3 2 Methodology 4 2.1 General approach 4 2.2 Principles for recalibrating MPWs and CMs 4 2.3 MPWs 8 2.4 CMs 9 3 Modelling 12 3.1 Process 12 3.2 Data sources and data cleansing 12 TOC engagement 12 MOIRA 12 PEARS 12 TOC specific data 13 3.3 Modelling MPWs 13 3.4 Modelling CMs 13 3.5 Model Review 14 Appendix 1 15 2 1 Introduction 1.1 Context The Office of Rail and Road (ORR) is currently in the process of reviewing the access charges and related matters for Network Rail for Control Period 6 (CP6), which runs from 1st April 2019 to 31st March 2024. As part of this review, the Rail Delivery Group (RDG) is leading the recalibration of Schedule 8, the performance regime which compensates train operators for the impact of unplanned service disruption. RDG commissioned PwC to undertake Phase 1 of the review, which focused on two key parameters used in the Schedule 8 performance regime1: Monitoring Point Weights (MPWs) A Monitoring Point is a point on the network (almost always a station) at which the lateness of trains in a Service Code within a Service Group in a given direction (forward/reverse) is measured. MPWs are calculated for each Monitoring Point. They reflect the proportion of a Service Group’s passengers alighting and interchanging at that Monitoring Point and any preceding stations which are not captured by a Monitoring Point.
    [Show full text]
  • Records of Wolverton Carriage and Wagon Works
    Records of Wolverton Carriage and Wagon Works A cataloguing project made possible by the Friends of the National Railway Museum Trustees of the National Museum of Science & Industry Contents 1. Description of Entire Archive: WOLV (f onds level description ) Administrative/Biographical History Archival history Scope & content System of arrangement Related units of description at the NRM Related units of descr iption held elsewhere Useful Publications relating to this archive 2. Description of Management Records: WOLV/1 (sub fonds level description) Includes links to content 3. Description of Correspondence Records: WOLV/2 (sub fonds level description) Includes links to content 4. Description of Design Records: WOLV/3 (sub fonds level description) (listed on separate PDF list) Includes links to content 5. Description of Production Records: WOLV/4 (sub fonds level description) Includes links to content 6. Description of Workshop Records: WOLV/5 (sub fonds level description) Includes links to content 2 1. Description of entire archive (fonds level description) Title Records of Wolverton Carriage and Wagon Works Fonds reference c ode GB 0756 WOLV Dates 1831-1993 Extent & Medium of the unit of the 87 drawing rolls, fourteen large archive boxes, two large bundles, one wooden box containing glass slides, 309 unit of description standard archive boxes Name of creators Wolverton Carriage and Wagon Works Administrative/Biographical Origin, progress, development History Wolverton Carriage and Wagon Works is located on the northern boundary of Milton Keynes. It was established in 1838 for the construction and repair of locomotives for the London and Birmingham Railway. In 1846 The London and Birmingham Railway joined with the Grand Junction Railway to become the London North Western Railway (LNWR).
    [Show full text]
  • Timetable Information Data Feed Interface Specification
    Timetable Information Data Feed Interface Specification Document Ref: RSPS5046 Version: 03-00 Rail Settlement Plan Limited Registered Office, 2nd Floor, 200 Aldersgate Street, London EC1A 4HD www.raildeliverygroup.com 020 7841 8000 Registered in England and Wales No. 03069042 Ref: RSPS5046 03-00 Timetable Information Page: 2 of 39 Data Feed Interface Specification Date: 01-Aug-2018 Version History Version Date Author Comments 00-00-A 24-Jan-14 Edna Kelly First draft. 00-00-B 21-May-14 Edna Kelly Reviewed by iBlocks. JIRA STD-612: ‘Copyright text to be added’ 00-00-C 22-May-14 Edna Kelly Addressed internal review comments. Neil Barkham 00-00-D 05-Jun-14 Neil Barkham More internal review comments addressed. 00-00-E 16-Jul-14 Neil Barkham Final external review comments addressed. 01-00 04-Aug-14 Neil Barkham Issued. 01-00-A 19-Jan-17 Edna Kelly Next Review Date reached. 01-00-B 08-Feb-17 Neil Barkham Correction of file references (§ 2.4). Train schedule clarification (§ 5.2.3.3). 01-00-C 28-Mar-17 Neil Barkham External review comments addressed. 01-00-D 19-Apr-17 Neil Barkham Addressed final external review comment. 02-00 15-May-17 Neil Barkham Issued. 02-00-A 05-Mar-18 Neil Barkham Updated to include ‘Additional Fixed Links File’ and the ‘TOC Specific Interchange Times File’. General review. Restructure to put example data with the feed definitions. 02-00-B 16-Apr-18 Neil Barkham Updated after internal review. 02-00-C 22-May-18 Neil Barkham Updated after external review.
    [Show full text]
  • Eighth Annual Market Monitoring Working Document March 2020
    Eighth Annual Market Monitoring Working Document March 2020 List of contents List of country abbreviations and regulatory bodies .................................................. 6 List of figures ............................................................................................................ 7 1. Introduction .............................................................................................. 9 2. Network characteristics of the railway market ........................................ 11 2.1. Total route length ..................................................................................................... 12 2.2. Electrified route length ............................................................................................. 12 2.3. High-speed route length ........................................................................................... 13 2.4. Main infrastructure manager’s share of route length .............................................. 14 2.5. Network usage intensity ........................................................................................... 15 3. Track access charges paid by railway undertakings for the Minimum Access Package .................................................................................................. 17 4. Railway undertakings and global rail traffic ............................................. 23 4.1. Railway undertakings ................................................................................................ 24 4.2. Total rail traffic .........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Britain's Rail Delivery Group, Comprising the Chief Executives of the Rail Owning Groups, Freight Operators and Network Rail T
    Written evidence from the Rail Delivery Group (ROR 01) 1. This is the response of the Rail Delivery Group (RDG) to the Transport Select Committee’s call for evidence on the reform of the railways. 2. The RDG welcomes the Government’s support for the RDG contained in the Command Paper ‘Reforming our Railways: Putting the Customer First’, which was published today. The Paper calls on the Rail Delivery Group to provide leadership to the industry and to respond to the Government’s strategic challenges. The Command Paper lays out the Government’s vision for an expanding and efficient railway that meets the needs of passengers, freight users and taxpayers. The Government sees the Rail Delivery Group leading the industry in driving up efficiency and demand for the railway. This is a challenge that the Group accepts. 3. The Command Paper calls on the Rail Delivery Group to lead the rail industry in working together to deliver a more efficient, more affordable railway. The Rail Delivery Group is pleased that the Government has recognised that the Group is taking and shaping the industry’s agenda for a sustained programme of improved management and running of the rail network. 4. The Command Paper lists the six priority areas being addressed by the Group • Asset, programme and supply chain management; • Contractual and regulatory reform; • Technology, innovation and working practices; • Train utilisation; • A whole-system approach; and • Industry planning 5. The Rail Delivery Group was created to unlock efficiencies that will improve Britain’s railways. In its first nine months the Group has identified opportunities for a range of savings, for example in asset management through earlier involvement of the operators in planning work on the network.
    [Show full text]
  • The Treachery of Strategic Decisions
    The treachery of strategic decisions. An Actor-Network Theory perspective on the strategic decisions that produce new trains in the UK. Thesis submitted in accordance with the requirements of the University of Liverpool for the degree of Doctor in Philosophy by Michael John King. May 2021 Abstract The production of new passenger trains can be characterised as a strategic decision, followed by a manufacturing stage. Typically, competing proposals are developed and refined, often over several years, until one emerges as the winner. The winning proposition will be manufactured and delivered into service some years later to carry passengers for 30 years or more. However, there is a problem: evidence shows UK passenger trains getting heavier over time. Heavy trains increase fuel consumption and emissions, increase track damage and maintenance costs, and these impacts could last for the train’s life and beyond. To address global challenges, like climate change, strategic decisions that produce outcomes like this need to be understood and improved. To understand this phenomenon, I apply Actor-Network Theory (ANT) to Strategic Decision-Making. Using ANT, sometimes described as the sociology of translation, I theorise that different propositions of trains are articulated until one, typically, is selected as the winner to be translated and become a realised train. In this translation process I focus upon the development and articulation of propositions up to the point where a winner is selected. I propose that this occurs within a valuable ‘place’ that I describe as a ‘decision-laboratory’ – a site of active development where various actors can interact, experiment, model, measure, and speculate about the desired new trains.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Policy Paper
    A new structure for success on Britain’s railway An ATOC position paper on industry structural reform March 2011 / 2 1 Introduction The challenge facing the rail industry is to cut costs while continuing to improve services for passengers. The McNulty Review into value for money has identified savings of up to £1bn a year above the efficiency targets already set for Network Rail, and the Office of Rail Regulation (ORR) estimates that rail infrastructure costs are up to 40% higher than in Europe. The key to better value for money is a more commercial railway that releases the full potential of the private sector and puts the passenger at its heart. This means a new, ‘horses for courses’, approach in which franchises are designed around the commercial and operational realities of each route, with government intervening and specifying to lesser or greater extents, as appropriate. There have been positive steps already. The Government’s policy of longer, less prescriptive franchises creates the potential to build on the success of operators in increasing patronage and driving revenue growth by attracting more private sector investment and reducing their own costs, particularly in areas where significant efficiency improvements are not possible within a short contract. Network Rail (NR)’s plans to create devolved business units should also help the operation of trains and track to work more closely together. But the scale of cost efficiencies identified requires a real step change which can only be achieved through more fundamental reform of the railways, engendering an even stronger commercial relationship between train operator and infrastructure provider and allowing train operators to play a much bigger part in prioritising infrastructure expenditure in line with customer needs.
    [Show full text]
  • Best Practices and Strategies for Improving Rail Energy Efficiency
    U.S. Department of Transportation Best Practices and Strategies for Federal Railroad Improving Rail Energy Efficiency Administration Office of Research and Development Washington, DC 20590 DOT/FRA/ORD-14/02 Final Report January 2014 NOTICE This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the Department of Transportation in the interest of information exchange. The United States Government assumes no liability for its contents or use thereof. Any opinions, findings and conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this material do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the United States Government, nor does mention of trade names, commercial products, or organizations imply endorsement by the United States Government. The United States Government assumes no liability for the content or use of the material contained in this document. NOTICE The United States Government does not endorse products or manufacturers. Trade or manufacturers’ names appear herein solely because they are considered essential to the objective of this report. REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington, DC 20503.
    [Show full text]
  • South Eastern Rail Franchise Consultation
    Rail Delivery Group Response to: Department for Transport South Eastern Rail Franchise consultation Date: June 2017 Rail Delivery Group Limited Registered Office, 2nd Floor, 200 Aldersgate Street, London EC1A 4HD www.raildeliverygroup.com 020 7841 8000 Registered in England and Wales No. 08176197 Rail Delivery Group response to: Department for Transport South Eastern Rail Franchise consultation Organisation: Rail Delivery Group Type: Business representative organisation 1) The Rail Delivery Group (RDG) brings together Network Rail and passenger and freight train operating companies. The purpose of the RDG is to enable Network Rail and passenger and freight train operating companies to succeed by delivering better services for their customers. Ultimately this benefits taxpayers, passengers and the wider economy. We aim to meet the needs of: a) our members, by enabling them to deliver better outcomes for customers and the country; b) government and regulators, by developing strategy, informing policy and confronting difficult decisions on choices; and c) rail and non-rail users, by improving customer experience and building public trust. Overview 2) The Rail Delivery Group (RDG) welcomes the opportunity to respond to the Department for Transport’s (DfT) consultation on the future of the South Eastern Rail Franchise. During the next South Eastern rail franchises we would like to see: a) Improvements in the understanding, measurement and delivery customer experience through the use of the ‘customer promises’ and The Customer HeartbeatTM; b) A better approach to fares and ticketing which improves simplicity and choice for customers underpinned by the Ticket Vending Machine (TVM) guidelines; and c) Effective collaboration between the infrastructure manager and the train operator through the alignment of incentives for the benefit of passengers.
    [Show full text]
  • Loco DLC Manual
    BR Blue Diesel Electric Pack Classes 09/33/73/416/421 © Copyright Dovetail Games 2016, all rights reserved Release Version 1.0 Train Simulator – BR Blue Diesel Electric Pack 1 BACKGROUND .................................................................................................. 3 1.1 Class 09 ....................................................................................................... 3 1.2 Class 33 ....................................................................................................... 4 1.3 Class 73 ....................................................................................................... 5 1.4 Class 416 2EPB ............................................................................................ 6 1.5 Class 421 4CIG ............................................................................................ 7 2 ROLLING STOCK ............................................................................................... 8 2.1 OBA Wagon .................................................................................................. 8 2.2 General Utility Vehicle (GUV) ........................................................................ 8 3 DRIVING THE LOCOMOTIVES ........................................................................... 9 3.1 Class 09 ....................................................................................................... 9 3.2 Class 33 ..................................................................................................... 10 3.3 Class
    [Show full text]
  • Dot 10440 DS1.Pdf
    - ~-"~., I ~------------~~ / PB293 ·246 1111111111111111111111111111111111111 Report No. FRA/ORD-78/29 ENGINEERING DATA ON SELECTED HIGH SPEED PASSENGER TRUCKS Stephen M. Shapiro The Budd Company Technical Center 300 Commerce Drive Fort Washington PA 19034 . .. .. ...,' ").' .. .'~.", "";i:,' .'. :7 ( JULY 1978 FINAL REPORT DOCUMENT IS AVAILABLE TO THE U.S. PUBLIC THROUGH THE NATIONAL TECHNICAL INFORMATION SERVICE, SPRINGFIELD, VIRGINIA 22161 ---,, Prepared for U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL RAILROAD ADMINISTRATION Office of Research and Development ,..; Washington DC 20590 I I./,' ~ ___ k ,---'-~-- -... ~.- -_. -"~, REPRODUCED BY: N .' u.s. Oepartmenl of Commerce ij. ~ :~.: National Technicallnfonnation Service r : Springfield, Virginia 22161 J l.._ .. ... _. .--J NOTICE This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the Department of Transportation in the interest of information exchange. The United States Govern­ ment assumes no liability for its contents or use thereof. \., .'" II I II NOTICE The United States Government does not endorse pro­ ducts or manufacturers. Trade or manufacturers' names appear herein solely because they are con­ sidered essential to the object of this report. ~_...J Technical Report Documeptation Page '", 1. Reopon No. FRA/ORD-78/29 4. Tille and S.ub'llie 5. Repori DOle July 1978 I ENGINEERING DATA ON SELECTED 6. Pedorming Orgonl zofl on Code I' HIGH SPEED PASSENGER TRUCKS f-,::--~"""""------------------------_-_----l~B -,'""p'-e-r-'o-,m-,n-g-O""'-9-0-n'-'-0-',-on-==R-e-po-r-'7N:-o-,----, 7. Author' 5: Stephen M. Shapiro DOT-TSC-FRA-78-4 9. Pedormlng Orgonl zollon Nome and Address 10, Work Un,t No ITRAIS) The Budd Company * RR830/R83l9 Technical Center 11.
    [Show full text]
  • Passenger Rolling Stock
    1 Foreword Its conclusions are entirely consistent with the findings of the recently published Rail Value for Money Study by Sir Roy McNulty. I am pleased to present the latest output from the Network Route Utilisation Strategy To achieve this will require the procurement of workstream: a draft strategy for passenger rolling stock to be fully aligned with planning the rolling stock procurement and associated capability of the infrastructure across the entire infrastructure planning. The document has network. Piecemeal approaches, or been produced in conjunction with train approaches which give low priority to whole-life operators, representatives of customers, whole-industry costs, to operational flexibility, or manufacturers and rolling stock owning groups to the interface between wheel and rail, are as well as the Department for Transport, unlikely to prove efficient. Transport Scotland, the Welsh Assembly Government, The Passenger Transport Going forward, we seek to work with our Executive Group and Transport for London. industry partners and, through engagement with the Rail Delivery Group, to take on the Under whichever structure the British railway challenge of driving out unnecessary cost from network has been organised, the alignment of the planning of future rolling stock, together passenger rolling stock procurement with a) with the infrastructure to accommodate it, to the customer needs and expectations and b) the ultimate benefit of passenger and taxpayer characteristics of the railway infrastructure has alike. always been complex. The historical development of the railway saw different track Paul Plummer and loading gauges, different platform heights and lengths, different signalling systems, Director, Planning and Development different braking systems, different types of electrification, different lengths of vehicles, different policies on maximum gradients (affecting train weights and speeds), different interior layouts of rolling stock, different operating practices, and so on and so forth.
    [Show full text]