DOCSLIB.ORG

Convencion Ingles Q6.Qxp 17/9/07 17:34 Página 1

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Convencion Ingles Q6.Qxp 17/9/07 17:34 Página 1 convencion ingles q6.qxp 17/9/07 17:34 Página 1 SPAIN Convention on Nuclear Safety Fourth National Report September 2007 convencion ingles q6.qxp 17/9/07 17:34 Página 2 © Copyright 2007, Consejo de Seguridad Nuclear Edita y distribuye: Consejo de Seguridad Nuclear C/ Pedro Justo Dorado Dellmans, 11. 28040 Madrid (España) www.csn.es [email protected] Imprime: Elecé Industria Gráfica Depósito Legal: M- ?????- 2007 convencion ingles q6.qxp 17/9/07 17:34 Página I Table of contents Introduction ................................................................... 1 Presentation of the Report .................................................. 1 Drawing up of the Fourth Report on the Convention on Nuclear Safety .............................................................................. 1 CHAPTER 2. OBLIGATIONS a) General provisions Article 6. Existing nuclear facilities ..................................... 3 6.1 Nuclear safety issues of greatest significance for each plant during the period .............................................. 3 6.2 Generic nuclear safety issues and regulatory practices initiated or completed during the period....................... 8 6.3 Safety improvement programmes implemented at the Spa- nish nuclear power plants on the initiative of the regulator and/or licensee ......................................................... 10 6.3.1 Integrated Probabilistic Safety Assessment program- me ............................................................... 10 6.3.2 Design Basis Review Programme ...................... 11 6.3.3 Other generic nuclear safety improvement program- mes.............................................................. 11 6.3.4 Plant specific safety improvement programmes....... 14 6.4 Generic evaluation of continued operation based on the safety level of the Spanish nuclear power plants............ 18 6.5 Degree of compliance with the obligations of the Convention... 19 Appendix 6.A: Basic characteristics of the Spanish nuclear power plants................................................................... 21 b) Legislation and regulation Article 7. Legal and regulatory framework ............................. 25 7.1 Main modifications to the legal framework.................... 25 7.1.1 Law on the Consejo de Seguridad Nuclear (Nucle- ar Safety Council) .......................................... 25 I convencion ingles q6.qxp 17/9/07 17:34 Página II 7.1.2 Legal standards ............................................. 25 7.1.3 Regulatory standards and other binding administrative acts................................................................ 26 7.1.4 Main issues addressed by the CSN guides published during the period ........................................... 28 7.2 Degree of compliance with the obligations of the Convention .. 28 Appendix 7.A: CSN Instructions published up to June 2007 ... 29 Appendix 7.B: CSN Safety Guides published up to 2007 ... 33 Article 8. Regulatory body................................................... 39 8.1 Functions and responsibilities of the MITYC ................. 39 8.1.1 Organizational Structure ................................. 39 8.1.2 Coordination of Nuclear R&D Activities ............. 40 8.1.3 Participation in International Organizations and Activities ...................................................... 40 8.2 Functions and Responsibilities of the CSN ................... 40 8.2.1 Structure of the CSN ...................................... 41 8.2.2 Review of the Strategic Orientation Plan ........... 43 8.2.3 CSN Internal Quality Plan ............................... 43 8.2.4 Review of CSN financing / CSN resources and personnel ...................................................... 44 8.2.5 CSN Personnel Training Plan ........................... 46 8.2.6 Evolution of CSN International Relations ........... 47 8.2.7 Evolution of R&D activities and results obtained.... 51 8.2.8 CSN public information policy ......................... 52 8.3 Regulatory efficiency improvement programmes ............ 54 8.3.1 Improvement of the efficiency of the regulatory body’s processes ............................................ 54 8.3.2 Improvement of the efficiency of licensee proces- ses interacting with those of the Regulatory Body..... 56 8.4 Degree of compliance with the obligations of the Conven- tion ......................................................................... 56 Appendix 8.A: Procedures approved as of April 16, 2007 .. 57 Appendix 8.B: R&D Projects Completed during the 2004-2006 period ........................................................................................ 65 II convencion ingles q6.qxp 17/9/07 17:34 Página III Article 9. Responsibilities of the Licensee ............................ 69 9.1 Legal and organisational changes during the period ....... 69 9.2 CSN regulatory strategy in relation to the licensee's orga- nization ................................................................... 69 9.3 Liability for nuclear damage ....................................... 70 9.3.1 Regime in force ............................................. 70 9.3.2 Revision of the regime in force......................... 70 9.4 Degree of compliance with the obligations of the Conven- tion ......................................................................... 71 c) General Considerations in relation to Nuclear Safety Article 10. Safety priority .................................................. 73 10.1 Main activities performed during the period by the licen- see in relation to safety culture ................................... 73 10.2 Regulatory control of licensee activities ....................... 75 10.3 Degree of compliance with the obligations of the Conven- tion ......................................................................... 75 Article 11. Financial and human resources ........................... 77 11.1 Significant changes during the period as regards the li- censee's financial and human resources ....................... 77 11.2 Significant changes during the period in the licensee's personnel training programmes ................................... 78 11.3 Regulatory supervision of the licensee's financial and hu- man aspects ............................................................. 79 11.4 Degree of compliance with the obligations of the Conven- tion ......................................................................... 80 Article 12. Human factors .................................................. 81 12.1 Significant licensee activities during the period ............ 81 12.2 Regulatory control of licensee activities ....................... 81 12.3 Degree of compliance with the obligations of the Conven- tion ......................................................................... 82 Article 13. Quality assurance .............................................. 83 13.1 Significant licensee activities carried out during the pe- riod in relation to quality systems................................ 83 13.2 Regulatory control of Licensee activities....................... 83 III convencion ingles q6.qxp 17/9/07 17:34 Página IV 13.3 Degree of compliance with the obligations of the Conven- tion ......................................................................... 84 Article 14. Safety Assessment and supervision ...................... 85 14.1 Introduction ............................................................. 85 14.2 Modifications to the system for assessment and verification and safety performed by the Licensee during this period....... 85 14.3 CSN supervision activities and results obtained............. 88 14.4 Situation of the Probabilistic Safety Assessment during the period ................................................................ 89 14.5 Results obtained from Periodic Safety Reviews.............. 91 14.6 Degree of compliance with the obligations of the Conven- tion ......................................................................... 92 Article15. Radiation Protection ........................................... 95 15.1 Summary of Laws, regulations and requirements referring to radiation protection at nuclear power plants.............. 95 15.1.1 Law Creating the Nuclear Safety Council (CSN) .... 95 15.1.2 Regulation on Health Protection against Ionising Radiations..................................................... 95 15.2 Control activities for the radiation protection of exposed workers.................................................................... 96 15.2.1 Dose limits.................................................... 96 15.2.2 Surveillance and control of occupational exposure... 96 15.2.3 Radiation work permits ................................... 97 15.2.4 Specific measures adopted for contractor company personnel...................................................... 97 15.2.5 Measures adopted to guarantee that occupational exposure to radiations is maintained within ALARA levels ........................................................... 98 15.3 Control activities for the radiation protection of the popu- lation ...................................................................... 99 15.3.1 Compliance with the conditions on the release of radioactive substances............................................... 99 15.3.2 Environmental radiological surveillance............. 99 15.3.3 Epidemiological study..................................... 100 15.4 Degree of compliance with the obligations of the Conven- tion ........................................................................... 101
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Projecting EU Demand for Natural Gas to 2030: a Meta-Analysis Author
    Title: Projecting EU demand for natural gas to 2030: a meta-analysis Author: Smith, William J. Affiliation: School of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, University College Dublin, Address: Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland Contacts: email: [email protected] Phone: +353 1 716 1902 Abstract Gas demand projections for the EU27 from a variety of sources are compared. Projected demand varies widely between sources, even when similar rates of economic growth and policy strength are assumed. The divergence is shown to result from differing assumptions concerning future energy intensity, on the one hand, and the future contribution of nuclear power and renewables (RES) to electricity generation on the other. The variation with time of some of these projections is also examined. It is found that the gas demand projected by both the International Energy Agency (IEA) and the European Commission (EC) for 2020 and for 2030 has tended to decrease with each successive projection. This is understandable, since the penetration of RES-E has continued to exceed expectations. However, in an economically depressed, post- Fukushima Europe, estimates of future growth in both RES and nuclear generation may need significant revision. The Energy Efficiency Directive, as agreed by the Council of the Page | 1 European Union and the European Parliament in April 2012 (Council of the European Union, 2012), will also impact significantly on future gas demand, even though the measures incorporated are weaker than the original proposal. The analysis presented here shows that a “nuclear decline” due to the Fukushima disaster is seen to moderate, rather than reverse, projected demand decay. A significant shortfall in projected RES capacity, if it were to occur, constitutes a potential source of additional gas demand.
    [Show full text]
  • NRC Visit of Dr. Agustin Alonso, Commisioner of the Spanish
    October 18, 2000 MEMORANDUM TO: Chairman Meserve Commissioner Dicus Commissioner Diaz Commissioner McGaffigan Commissioner Merrifield FROM: Janice Dunn Lee, Director /RA/ Office of International Programs SUBJECT: NRC VISIT OF DR. AGUSTIN ALONSO, COMMISSIONER OF THE SPANISH CONSEJO DE SEGURIDAD NUCLEAR (OCTOBER 24, 2000) Attached please find a schedule of appointments, biographical and background information, and talking points for the NRC visit of Dr. Augustin Alonso, Commissioner of the Spanish Consejo de Seguridad Nuclear (CSN), October 24, 2000. Attachments: As stated cc: SECY OGC EDO RES NRR NMSS AEOD OIP CONTACT: B. Doroshuk (Tel. 415-2775) DISTRIBUTION: OIP R/F SSchuyler-Hayes, Team B B. Doroshuk, Team A ADAMS - IP-2A-46 DOCUMENT NAME: G:\Spain\Alonso00.wpd To receive a copy of this document, indicate in the box: "C" = Copy without enclosures "E" = Copy with enclosures "N" = No copy OFFICE OIP/Team B OIP/Team A OIP/D OIP/D NAME SSchuyler-Hayes:vl EDoroshuk RHauber J Dunn Lee DATE 10/17/00 04/ /01 04/ /01 04/ /01 04/ /01 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY NRC VISIT OF COMMISSIONER AGUSTIN ALONSO SPANISH CONSEJO DE SEGURIDAD NUCLEAR (CSN) OCTOBER 24, 2000 Schedule Tuesday, October 24: 1:15-1:45 Meeting with Commissioner Merrifield in his office 2:00-2:30 Meeting with Chairman Meserve in his office 3:00-3:30 Meeting with Commissioner Diaz in his office Accompanied by Commissioner Alonso will be accompanied to the above noted appointments by OIP staff. Purpose of the Visit Dr. Agustin Alonso, Commissioner, Spanish Nuclear Safety Council (the Consejo de Seguridad Nuclear or CSN), will be in the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Energy Policies of IEA Countries Spain
    Secure Sustainable Together Energy Policies of IEA Countries Spain 2015 Review Please note that this PDF is subject to specific restrictions that limit its use and distribution. The terms and conditions are available online at http://www.iea.org/t&c/ 2015 OECD/IEA, © Secure Sustainable Together Energy Policies of IEA Countries Spain 2015 Review 2015 OECD/IEA, © INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY The International Energy Agency (IEA), an autonomous agency, was established in November 1974. Its primary mandate was – and is – two-fold: to promote energy security amongst its member countries through collective response to physical disruptions in oil supply, and provide authoritative research and analysis on ways to ensure reliable, affordable and clean energy for its 29 member countries and beyond. The IEA carries out a comprehensive programme of energy co-operation among its member countries, each of which is obliged to hold oil stocks equivalent to 90 days of its net imports. The Agency’s aims include the following objectives: n Secure member countries’ access to reliable and ample supplies of all forms of energy; in particular, through maintaining effective emergency response capabilities in case of oil supply disruptions. n Promote sustainable energy policies that spur economic growth and environmental protection in a global context – particularly in terms of reducing greenhouse-gas emissions that contribute to climate change. n Improve transparency of international markets through collection and analysis of energy data. n Support global collaboration on energy technology to secure future energy supplies and mitigate their environmental impact, including through improved energy efficiency and development and deployment of low-carbon technologies.
    [Show full text]
  • Master Thesis
    Fakultät für Maschinenwesen Master Thesis Author: B. Sc. Joan Sabaté Francés Student ID: 03681351 Critical analysis of important aspects of the decommissioning process for an American and a Spanish nuclear power plant Supervisor: Prof. Dr. Rafael Macián-Juan (TUM, Ntech) Begin: 12/12/2017 End: 12/04/2018 Date of Presentation: 12/04/2018 Abstract Abstract The decommissioning of nuclear power plants is the driving motivation for the present work. However, decommissioning or dismantling of nuclear power plants is a wide topic and it is carried out in different ways in every country. Various factors like experience in previous decommissioning processes, own interpretation of regulations or different management teams lead to distinct decommissioning processes. However, the diverse strategies reach the goals stablished by the international organisms. Although there is a global organization called “International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)”, which “promotes nuclear safety and nuclear security standards and their implementation” [1], every country applies its own procedures or laws based on the directions from IAEA. As a consequence, this work encompasses the analysis of some important aspects of the decommissioning of two nuclear power plants: Vandellòs 1 (located in Spain) and San Onofre (located in USA). The topics analysed are the following ones: Decommissioning strategy Impact on staffing and socio-economic factors Phases of decommissioning The decommissioning management team Waste management 2 Preface Preface This work will examine and analyse how two different nuclear power plants (Vandellòs 1 and San Onofre) have developed some important aspects of decommissioning. The first section will introduce the topic taking the motivation of this work into consideration.
    [Show full text]
  • Radioactive Waste Management Programmes in OECD/NEA Member Countries – Overview
    Cov-Eng-Pochette 2005 21/09/05 15:04 Page 1 Australia Radioactive Waste Belgium Canada Management Programmes Czech Republic Finland in OECD/NEA Member France Countries Germany Hungary Italy Japan Korea Mexico Netherlands Norway Slovak Republic Spain Sweden Switzerland United Kingdom United States NUCLEAR•ENERGY•AGENCY 1-OVERVIEW.qxp 16/11/05 17:18 Page 1 Radioactive waste management programmes in OECD/NEA member countries – Overview International co-operation at the OECD/NEA concerning the management of radioactive waste and materials The role of the NEA Radioactive Waste Management Committee (RWMC) Radioactive waste and materials exist in countries Strategies with and without nuclar power programmes and need In particular, the RWMC facilitates the elaboration to be managed in a manner that is responsible to pres- of strategies for waste management and decommis- ent and future generations. Significant progress has sioning, including regulatory approaches, at the been achieved and considerable experience is avail- national and international levels by: able in NEA member countries on waste and mate- ● reviewing strategies adopted by member countries rials processing, conditioning, storage, transport and with a view to identify and analyse emerging tech- disposal. An important experience and knowledge nical, policy and regulatory issues and to forge base has also been developed as regards decommis- consensus views; sioning and dismantling nuclear installations. Special ● reviewing regulatory bases, requirements and efforts are being expended in the area of long-term criteria, and licensing processes, in addition to management of radioactive waste in order to continue proposing regulatory approaches; to integrate technical advances and societal demands ● in decision making as well as to understand and developing methodologies for evaluating long-term develop consensus views on regulatory and policy safety; ● issues.
    [Show full text]
  • Spain 2021: Energy Policy Review
    Spain 2021 Energy Policy Review INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY The IEA examines the IEA member IEA association full spectrum countries: countries: of energy issues including oil, gas and Australia Brazil coal supply and Austria China demand, renewable Belgium India energy technologies, Canada Indonesia electricity markets, Czech Republic Morocco energy efficiency, Denmark Singapore access to energy, Estonia South Africa demand side Finland Thailand management and France much more. Through Germany its work, the IEA Greece advocates policies Hungary that will enhance the reliability, affordability Ireland and sustainability of Italy energy in its Japan 30 member countries, Korea 8 association Luxembourg countries and beyond. Mexico Netherlands New Zealand Norway Poland Portugal Please note that this Slovak Republic publication is subject to Spain specific restrictions that limit Sweden its use and distribution. The terms and conditions are Switzerland available online at Turkey www.iea.org/t&c/ United Kingdom United States This publication and any The European map included herein are without prejudice to the Commission also status of or sovereignty over participates in the any territory, to the work of the IEA delimitation of international frontiers and boundaries and to the name of any territory, city or area. Source: IEA. All rights reserved. International Energy Agency Website: www.iea.org Foreword The International Energy Agency (IEA) has conducted in-depth peer reviews of its member countries’ energy policies since 1976. This process supports energy policy development and encourages the exchange of and learning from international best practices. By seeing what has worked – or not – in the “real world”, these reviews help to identify policies that deliver concrete results.
    [Show full text]
  • España Ante El Reto De La Seguridad Energética
    Documento de Trabajo OPEX España ante el reto de la seguridad energética Soledad Segoviano Monterrubio SOLEDAD SEGOVIANO MONTERRUBIO es Profesora de Relaciones Internacionales en la Facultad de Ciencias de la Información y en la Facultad de Ciencias Políticas de la Universidad Complutense de Madrid. Doctora Cum Laude en Ciencias de la Información por la UCM. Becaria Fulbright y Master en Relaciones Internacionales por la Universidad de Columbia de Nueva York, Estados Unidos. Diplomada en Altos Estudios de la Defensa por el CESEDEN, Centro de Estudios de la Defensa Nacional, del Ministerio de Defensa de España. Es especialista en las áreas de seguridad, defensa y política exterior de Estados Unidos, temas sobre los que ha escrito numerosos artículos en revistas científicas especializadas. Forma parte del Consejo Editorial de la Revista Estudios Internacionales de la Complutense y es colaboradora habitual del CESEDEN y de la Fundación Fuhem. Ninguna parte ni la totalidad de este documento puede ser repro du cida, grabada o transmitida en forma alguna ni por cualquier pro ce di miento, ya sea electrónico, mecánico, reprográfico, magnético o cual quier otro, sin autorización previa y por escrito de la Fundación Al ternativas. © Fundación Alternativas © Soledad Segoviano Monterrubio 1 ÍNDICE Abstract Resumen Ejecutivo Siglas y unidades de medida 1.- Panorama energético de España: Dependencia y Vulnerabilidad 1.1.- Panorámica energética A) Indicadores energéticos A.1.- Consumo de energía primaria A.2.- Consumo de energía final A.3.- Intensidad
    [Show full text]
  • Member State's Energy Dependence: an Indicator-Based Assessment
    ISSN 1725-3209 (online) ISSN 1725-3195 (print) EUROPEAN ECONOMY Occasional Papers 196 | June 2014 Member State’s Energy Dependence: An Indicator-Based Assessment Economic and Financial Affairs Occasional Papers are written by the staff of the Directorate-General for Economic and Financial Affairs, or by experts working in association with them. The Papers are intended to increase awareness of the technical work being done by staff and cover a wide spectrum of subjects. Views expressed in unofficial documents do not necessarily reflect the official views of the European Commission. Comments and enquiries should be addressed to: European Commission Directorate-General for Economic and Financial Affairs Unit Communication B-1049 Brussels Belgium E-mail: [email protected] LEGAL NOTICE Neither the European Commission nor any person acting on its behalf may be held responsible for the use which may be made of the information contained in this publication, or for any errors which, despite careful preparation and checking, may appear. This paper exists in English only and can be downloaded from http://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/publications/. More information on the European Union is available on http://europa.eu. KC-AH-14-196-EN-N (online) KC-AH-14-196-EN-C (print) ISBN 978-92-79-35380-2 (online) ISBN 978-92-79-36124-1 (print) doi:10.2765/75127 (online) doi:10.2765/78633 (print) © European Union, 2014 Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged. European Commission Directorate-General for Economic and Financial Affairs
    [Show full text]
  • Anàlisi Del Metabolisme Energètic De L’Economia Catalana (AMEEC)
    Anàlisi del Metabolisme Energètic de l’Economia Catalana (AMEEC) Bloc 2: Energia Primària a Catalunya Jesús Ramos Martín, Sílvia Cañellas Boltà i Daniela Russi Juny de 2007 Estudi encarregat pel Consell Assessor per al Desenvolupament Sostenible (CADS). Generalitat de Catalunya. Equip de recerca: Jesús Ramos Martín (coordinador) i Sílvia Cañellas Boltà Institut d’Estudis Catalans (IEC) Anàlisi del Metabolisme Energètic de l’Economia Catalana (AMEEC) Bloc 2: Energia Primària a Catalunya Juny 2007 ii Continguts Resum Executiu................................................................................................1 Consum d’energia per sectors econòmics...................................................2 Generació d’energia de fonts renovables....................................................4 Costos de la generació amb energies renovables.......................................6 Origen de l’energia primària i consideracions de risc ..................................6 El cas del biodièsel......................................................................................9 Conclusions finals......................................................................................10 1. Introducció ..................................................................................................11 2. Evolució de la producció i consum d’energia primària a Catalunya......13 2.1. Algunes definicions ................................................................................13 2.2. Consum d’energia primària a Catalunya en el període
    [Show full text]
  • Approaches Used for Clearance of Lands from Nuclear Facilities Among Several Countries Evaluation for Regulatory Input
    Author: Robert A. Meck 2013:14Approaches used for Clearance of Lands from Nuclear Facilities among Several Countries Evaluation for Regulatory Input Report number: 2013:14 ISSN: 2000-0456 Available at www.stralsakerhetsmyndigheten.se SSM perspektiv SSM har nyligen beslutat om föreskrifter om friklassning av material, loka- ler, byggnader och mark vid verksamhet med joniserande strålning (SSMFS 2011:2). Föreskrifterna innehåller bland annat krav på att tillståndshavare, vid avveckling av verksamhet med joniserande strålning, ska vidta åtgärder som möjliggör friklassning av lokaler, byggnader och mark. Föreskrifterna innehåller nuklidspecifika friklassningsnivåer i becquerel per m2 för lokaler och byggnader men ger ingen upplysning om vilka friklassningsnivåer som ska tillämpas vid friklassning av mark. Istället anges att SSM ska besluta om friklassningsnivåer för mark i det enskilda fallet och att tillståndshavaren ska upprätta ett kontrollprogram för den provtagning och de mätningar som avses genomföras för att visa att friklassningsnivåerna uppfylls. Under kommande år avser SSM att utveckla föreskrifter och eventuellt även allmänna råd om friklassning av mark som kan ha förorenats med radioaktiva ämnen till följd av verksamhet med joniserande strålning, till exempel drift av kärnteknisk anläggning. Som underlag för detta arbete, och för att bidra till utvecklingen i Sverige av robusta metoder för provtag- ning, friklassningsmätning och utvärdering av resultaten, har SSM låtit genomföra den studie som redovisas i denna rapport. I rapporten görs en utvärdering av olika metoder och angreppssätt som tillämpas i några utvalda länder för att uppnå friklassning av markområden där kärnteknisk verksamhet bedrivits. De olika metoderna och angreppssätten analyseras med avseende på ett flertal olika aspekter. Studien fokuserar på frågan om hur det på ett tillförlitligt och transparent sätt kan visas att angivna friklassningsnivåer innehålls.
    [Show full text]
  • SWOT Analysis
    European Nuclear Energy Forum Bratislava - Prague ENEF Working Group Opportunities – Subgroup on Competitiveness of Nuclear Power Strengths – Weaknesses – Opportunities – Threats (SWOT) Analysis Part 1: Strengths & Weaknesses May 2010 Acknowledgement Contributors (Status March 2010): Mr Beutier Didier AREVA - Chair of the Subgroup Competitiveness Mr Allehof Dieter EnBW Mr Bobo-Perez Emilio ENUSA Mrs Brozek Stella FORATOM Mr Büchner Heinz-Jürgen IKB – Deutsche Industriebank AG Mr Buet Baptiste AREVA Mr Catenos Laurent EDF Mr Chellini Igino ENEL Mr Cloquet Daniel BUSINESSEUROPE Mr Contri Paolo JRC NL Mr Daire Jean-Christophe Bouygues Construction Mr Debresson Thierry Rio Tinto ALCAN Mrs Dellero Nicole AREVA Mr Dierick Christian AGORIA – Belgian Employers’ Organisation Mr Ehlert Andreas E.ON Mr Fritze Ralf Jürgen Siemens Mr Gilchrist David ENEL Mr Gordelier Stan OECD-NEA Mr Hirschberg Stefan Paul Scherrer Institut (PSI) Mrs Horova Lucie CEZ Mr Janouch Frantisek Czech Ministry of Industry & Trade Mrs Kainurinne Kaija TVO Mr Katmeridis Kristo SUEZ Mrs Krejcirikova Zuzana CEZ / EURELECTRIC Prof Kröger Wolfgang ETH Zürich Mrs Kynclova Hana Czech Ministry of Foreign Affairs Mr Langlois Jean-Paul CEA Mr Lauber Matthias RWE Mr Lefhalm Cord-Henrich RWE Mr Leon-Lopez Pablo ENDESA Mr Lorenz Gunnar EURELECTRIC Mr Misak Jozef UJV / SNE-TP Mr Nuttal William Cambridge University Mr Ott Nicolas Permanent Representation of France to the EU Mrs Popescu Elena Permanent Representation of Romania to the EU Mr Rakhorst Huub URENCO Mrs Rompel Susanne RWE Mr Sebellin Eric AIRLIQUIDE / BUSINESSEUROPE Mr Sellier Emmanuel EDF Mr Servajean Jean-Bernard EDF Mr Temboury Juan IFIEC-Federation of Industrial Energy Consumers Mr Tóth Gabor EURELECTRIC Mr Tulonen Sami FORATOM Prof Voß Alfred Universität Stuttgart This list includes both „permanent“participants to the working group and “external” contributors who have kindly accepted to supply material, i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • Spain's Electricity Market Design
    Spain’s electricity market design – A case study PATRIK BENNERSTEDT JOHAN GRELSSON Master of Science Thesis Stockholm, Sweden 2012 Spain’s electricity market design -A case study Patrik Bennerstedt Johan Grelsson Master of Science Thesis INDEK 2012 Master of Science Thesis KTH Industrial Engineering and KTH School of Industrial Engineering and Management Management Energy Technology EGI-2012-025MSC Industrial Management 2012:31 Division of Applied Thermodynamics SE-100 44 STOCKHOLM SE-100 44 STOCKHOLM Master of Science Thesis INDEK 2012:31 Master of Science Thesis EGI 2012: EKV883 Spain’s electricity market design -A case study Patrik Bennerstedt Johan Grelsson Approved Examiner Supervisor 2012-06-08 Staffan Laestadius Thomas Sandberg Commissioner Contact person Vattenfall Mats Nilsson Abstract Spain’s rapid implementation of renewable energy has been described as a success but the governmental cost associated to this rapid implementation has grown significantly. The purpose of this report is to investigate Spain’s electricity market, its current situation and present it, using the Swedish system as a reference. The report commences with a presentation of the Spanish and the Swedish electricity markets, followed by a chapter where they are compared. The renewable electricity production and the associated development during the last decade is one focus of the comparison. The other focus is how the costs of the subsidy systems have evolved and how they are connected to the different energy sources. Two sources, wind and solar, receives a higher interest than the others. Wind power shows a strong development in electricity production and contributes to a significant part of the Spanish electricity mix.
    [Show full text]