Notes on the Intertidal Ecology of Trial Harbour, Tasmania
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
West Coast Land Use Planning Strategy
" " " " " " " " " !"#$%&'(#$%&')*&+,%,(*-%)#"%.,(**+*/%#$0($"/1%" " #".$"23"0%4567% " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " Prepared for West Coast Council" " By:" ႛ Integrated Planning Solutions; ႛ Essential Economics; and ႛ Ratio Consultants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
E Urban Sanctuary Algae and Marine Invertebrates of Ricketts Point Marine Sanctuary
!e Urban Sanctuary Algae and Marine Invertebrates of Ricketts Point Marine Sanctuary Jessica Reeves & John Buckeridge Published by: Greypath Productions Marine Care Ricketts Point PO Box 7356, Beaumaris 3193 Copyright © 2012 Marine Care Ricketts Point !is work is copyright. Apart from any use permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced by any process without prior written permission of the publisher. Photographs remain copyright of the individual photographers listed. ISBN 978-0-9804483-5-1 Designed and typeset by Anthony Bright Edited by Alison Vaughan Printed by Hawker Brownlow Education Cheltenham, Victoria Cover photo: Rocky reef habitat at Ricketts Point Marine Sanctuary, David Reinhard Contents Introduction v Visiting the Sanctuary vii How to use this book viii Warning viii Habitat ix Depth x Distribution x Abundance xi Reference xi A note on nomenclature xii Acknowledgements xii Species descriptions 1 Algal key 116 Marine invertebrate key 116 Glossary 118 Further reading 120 Index 122 iii Figure 1: Ricketts Point Marine Sanctuary. !e intertidal zone rocky shore platform dominated by the brown alga Hormosira banksii. Photograph: John Buckeridge. iv Introduction Most Australians live near the sea – it is part of our national psyche. We exercise in it, explore it, relax by it, "sh in it – some even paint it – but most of us simply enjoy its changing modes and its fascinating beauty. Ricketts Point Marine Sanctuary comprises 115 hectares of protected marine environment, located o# Beaumaris in Melbourne’s southeast ("gs 1–2). !e sanctuary includes the coastal waters from Table Rock Point to Quiet Corner, from the high tide mark to approximately 400 metres o#shore. -
Habitat Preference and Population Ecology of Limpets Cellana
Hindawi Publishing Corporation Journal of Ecosystems Volume 2014, Article ID 874013, 6 pages http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/874013 Research Article Habitat Preference and Population Ecology of Limpets Cellana karachiensis (Winckworth) and Siphonaria siphonaria (Sowerby) at Veraval Coast of Kathiawar Peninsula, India Julee Faladu, Bhavik Vakani, Paresh Poriya, and Rahul Kundu Department of Biosciences, Saurashtra University, Rajkot, Gujarat 360005, India Correspondence should be addressed to Rahul Kundu; [email protected] Received 7 May 2014; Revised 6 July 2014; Accepted 20 July 2014; Published 17 August 2014 Academic Editor: Wen-Cheng Liu Copyright © 2014 Julee Faladu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Present study reports the habitat preference and spatiotemporal variations in the population abundance of limpets Cellana karachiensis and Siphonaria siphonaria inhabiting rocky intertidal zones of Veraval coast, Kathiawar Peninsula, India. The entire intertidal zone of the Veraval coast was divided into five microsampling sites based on their substratum type and assemblage structure. Extensive field surveys were conducted every month in these microsampling sites and the population abundance of two limpet species was analyzed using belt transect method. The results revealed that C. karachiensis was the dominating species at microsampling Site-1 (having rocky substratum) possibly due to its ability to tolerate high desiccation, salinity, and temperature fluctuations, while the S. siphonaria was found to be the most dominating species at microsampling Site-2 (having rocky substratum with abundant algal population) possibly due to their preference for the perpetual wet areas. -
Provision of Professional Services Western Tasmania Industry Infrastructure Study TRIM File No.: 039909/002 Brief No.: 1280-3-19 Project No.: A130013.002
Provision of Professional Services Western Tasmania Industry Infrastructure Study TRIM File No.: 039909/002 Brief No.: 1280-3-19 Project No.: A130013.002 Western Tasmania Industry Infrastructure Study FINAL REPORT May 2012 Sinclair Knight Merz 100 Melville St, Hobart 7000 GPO Box 1725 Hobart TAS 7001 Australia Tel: +61 3 6221 3711 Fax: +61 3 6224 2325 Web: www.skmconsulting.com COPYRIGHT: The concepts and information contained in this document are the property of Sinclair Knight Merz Pty Ltd. Use or copying of this document in whole or in part without the written permission of Sinclair Knight Merz constitutes an infringement of copyright. LIMITATION: This report has been prepared on behalf of and for the exclusive use of Sinclair Knight Merz Pty Ltd’s Client, and is subject to and issued in connection with the provisions of the agreement between Sinclair Knight Merz and its Client. Sinclair Knight Merz accepts no liability or responsibility whatsoever for or in respect of any use of or reliance upon this report by any third party. The SKM logo trade mark is a registered trade mark of Sinclair Knight Merz Pty Ltd. Final Report Contents Executive Summary 1 1. Introduction and background 13 1.1. Strategic background 13 1.2. Policy and planning framework 14 1.3. This report 15 1.4. Approach adopted 16 2. Report 1: Infrastructure audit report 17 2.1. Introduction 17 2.2. Road Infrastructure 17 2.2.1. Roads Policy and Planning Context 17 2.2.2. Major Road Corridor 20 2.2.2.1. Anthony Main Road (DIER) 20 2.2.2.2. -
國立中山大學海洋生物研究所碩士論文指導教授︰劉莉蓮博士台灣西海岸蚵岩螺(Thais Clavigera)
國立中山大學海洋生物研究所碩士論文 指導教授︰劉莉蓮博士 台灣西海岸蚵岩螺(Thais clavigera) 之族群遺傳結構 研究生︰謝榮昌撰 中華民國 九十 年 六 月 二十九 日 台灣西海岸蚵岩螺(Thais clavigera) 之族群遺傳結構 國立中山大學海洋生物研究所碩士論文摘要 研究生:謝榮昌 指導教授︰劉莉蓮博士 本文係利用蛋白質電泳技術,分析台灣西海岸蚵岩螺(Thais clavigera)族 群遺傳結構;探討地點(香山、台西、布袋、七股),成熟度(成熟、未成熟) 以及時間(1999.7~2000.3、2000.11)三因子,對蚵岩螺族群遺傳結構之影響。 結果顯示 11 個基因座中,僅 Ark、Lap-1、Lap-2、Pgm-1 四個為多型性基因座。 地點間平均基因異質性(mean heterozygosity, H)介於 0.100~0.129 之間,遺傳距 離(genetic distance , D)介於 0.0005~0.0029 之間,因此台灣西海岸蚵岩螺可視 為同一族群。但族群分化現象仍然存在,分化差異是由 Ark 基因座造成,依族群 分化差異排序為香山、布袋、台西、七股。此外,Ark 基因座之異質性在四個地 點都有隨著蚵岩螺體型的增大有提高的趨勢,平均基因異質性亦有相同的趨勢, 而不同採樣時間對遺傳結構的影響不大。由本實驗結果推測,蚵岩螺生殖生態和 環境因子(環境品質和地形),可能是造成台灣西海岸蚵岩螺族群遺傳結構相似 度高的重要因素。 III Genetic structure of populations of oyster drill(Thais clavigera) along the west coast of Taiwan Yung-Chang Hsieh (Advisor : L. L. Liu ) Institute of Marine Biology, National Sun Yat-sen University, Kaohsiung 804, Taiwan, R. O. C. Thesis abstract The genetic structure of oyster drill Thais clavigera along the west coast of Taiwan were assayed by starch gel electrophoresis. Factors of locality(i.e. Shainsan, Taisi, Budai, Chiku),maturity(i.e. mature, immature) and sampling time (i.e.1999.7~2000.3, 2000.11) were analyzed to evaluate their effects on drill‘s genetic structure . Four of the eleven investigated enzyme loci were polymorphic , i.e. Ark, Lap-1, Lap-2, and Pgm-1. Among the four populations , the mean heterozygosity (H)and genetic distances(D) ranged from 0.100 to 0.129 and from 0.0005 to 0.0029, respectively. Therefore, T. clavigera along the west coast of Taiwan belongs to the same population. -
The Influence of Canopy Cover on the Ecological Function of a Key Autogenic Ecosystem Engineer
diversity Article The Influence of Canopy Cover on the Ecological Function of A Key Autogenic Ecosystem Engineer Jacqueline B. Pocklington 1,2,*, Michael J. Keough 2, Tim D. O’Hara 1 and Alecia Bellgrove 3 1 Department of Marine Invertebrates, Museum Victoria, Carlton, VIC 3053, Australia; [email protected] 2 School of BioSciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia; [email protected] 3 School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Centre for Integrative Ecology, Deakin University, Warrnambool Campus, PO Box 423, Warrnambool, VIC 3280, Australia; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 8 April 2019; Accepted: 15 May 2019; Published: 17 May 2019 Abstract: Intertidal fucoid algae can function as ecosystem engineers across temperate marine regions. In this investigation, we assessed the function of the alga dominating rocky reefs in temperate Australia and New Zealand, Hormosira banksii. Invertebrate and algal species assemblages were examined within areas of full H. banksii canopy, areas where it was naturally patchy or absent (within its potential range on the shore) and areas where the intact canopy was experimentally disturbed. Differences in species assemblages were detected between areas with natural variation in H. banksii cover (full, patchy, negligible), with defined species associated with areas of full cover. Differences were also detected between experimentally manipulated and naturally patchy areas of canopy cover. Species assemblages altered in response to canopy manipulations and did not recover even twelve months after initial sampling. Both light intensity and temperature were buffered by full canopies compared to patchy canopies and exposed rock. This study allows us to predict the consequences to the intertidal community due to the loss of canopy cover, which may result from a range of disturbances such as trampling, storm damage, sand burial and prolonged exposure to extreme temperature, and further allow for improved management of this key autogenic ecosystem engineer. -
World Heritage Values and to Identify New Values
FLORISTIC VALUES OF THE TASMANIAN WILDERNESS WORLD HERITAGE AREA J. Balmer, J. Whinam, J. Kelman, J.B. Kirkpatrick & E. Lazarus Nature Conservation Branch Report October 2004 This report was prepared under the direction of the Department of Primary Industries, Water and Environment (World Heritage Area Vegetation Program). Commonwealth Government funds were contributed to the project through the World Heritage Area program. The views and opinions expressed in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Department of Primary Industries, Water and Environment or those of the Department of the Environment and Heritage. ISSN 1441–0680 Copyright 2003 Crown in right of State of Tasmania Apart from fair dealing for the purposes of private study, research, criticism or review, as permitted under the Copyright Act, no part may be reproduced by any means without permission from the Department of Primary Industries, Water and Environment. Published by Nature Conservation Branch Department of Primary Industries, Water and Environment GPO Box 44 Hobart Tasmania, 7001 Front Cover Photograph: Alpine bolster heath (1050 metres) at Mt Anne. Stunted Nothofagus cunninghamii is shrouded in mist with Richea pandanifolia scattered throughout and Astelia alpina in the foreground. Photograph taken by Grant Dixon Back Cover Photograph: Nothofagus gunnii leaf with fossil imprint in deposits dating from 35-40 million years ago: Photograph taken by Greg Jordan Cite as: Balmer J., Whinam J., Kelman J., Kirkpatrick J.B. & Lazarus E. (2004) A review of the floristic values of the Tasmanian Wilderness World Heritage Area. Nature Conservation Report 2004/3. Department of Primary Industries Water and Environment, Tasmania, Australia T ABLE OF C ONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS .................................................................................................................................................................................1 1. -
The Response of a Protandrous Species to Exploitation, and the Implications for Management: a Case Study with Patellid Limpets
University of Southampton Research Repository ePrints Soton Copyright © and Moral Rights for this thesis are retained by the author and/or other copyright owners. A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge. This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the copyright holder/s. The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given e.g. AUTHOR (year of submission) "Full thesis title", University of Southampton, name of the University School or Department, PhD Thesis, pagination http://eprints.soton.ac.uk University of Southampton Faculty of Engineering, Science and Mathematics National Oceanography Centre, Southampton School of Ocean and Earth Sciences The Response of a Protandrous Species to Exploitation, and the Implications for Management: a Case Study with Patellid Limpets. William J F Le Quesne Thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy July 2005 Graduate School of the National Oceanography Centre, Southampton This PhD dissertation by William J F Le Quesne has been produced under the supervision of the following persons: Supervisors: Prof. John G. Shepherd Prof Stephen Hawkins Chair of Advisory Panel: Dr Lawrence E. Hawkins Member of Advisory Panel: Dr John A. Williams University -
2006-2007 Intertidal Reef Biodiversity on Kangaroo
2006-2007 Kangaroo Island Natural Resources Management Board INTERTIDAL REEF BIODIVERSITY Intertidal Reef Biodiversity on Kangaroo Island – 2007 ON KANGAROO ISLAND 1 INTERTIDAL REEF BIODIVERSITY ON KANGAROO ISLAND Oceans of Blue: Coast, Estuarine and Marine Monitoring Program A report prepared for the Kangaroo Island Natural Resources Management Board by Kirsten Benkendorff Martine Kinloch Daniel Brock June 2007 2006-2007 Kangaroo Island Natural Resources Management Board Intertidal Reef Biodiversity on Kangaroo Island – 2007 2 Oceans of Blue The views expressed and the conclusions reached in this report are those of the author and not necessarily those of persons consulted. The Kangaroo Island Natural Resources Management Board shall not be responsible in any way whatsoever to any person who relies in whole or in part on the contents of this report. Project Officer Contact Details Martine Kinloch Coast and Marine Program Manager Kangaroo Island Natural Resources Management Board PO Box 665 Kingscote SA 5223 Phone: (08) 8553 4980 Fax: (08) 8553 0122 Email: [email protected] Kangaroo Island Natural Resources Management Board Contact Details Jeanette Gellard General Manager PO Box 665 Kingscote SA 5223 Phone: (08) 8553 0111 Fax: (08) 8553 0122 Email: [email protected] © Kangaroo Island Natural Resources Management Board This document may be reproduced in whole or part for the purpose of study or training, subject to the inclusion of an acknowledgment of the source and to its not being used for commercial purposes or sale. Reproduction for purposes other than those given above requires the prior written permission of the Kangaroo Island Natural Resources Management Board. -
Annual Planning Report 2020
ANNUAL PLANNING REPORT 2020 Feedback and enquiries We welcome feedback and enquiries on our 2020 APR, particularly from anyone interested in discussing opportunities for demand management or other innovative solutions to manage limitations. Please send feedback and enquiries to: [email protected] Potential demand management solution providers can also register with us via our demand management register on our website at https://www.tasnetworks.com.au/demand-management-engagement-register 1. Introduction 2 2. Network transformation 12 3. Transmission network development 22 4. Area planning constraints and developments 36 5. Network performance 66 6. Tasmanian power system 82 7. Information for new transmission network connections 96 Glossary 106 Abbreviations 109 Appendix A Regulatory framework and planning process 110 Appendix B Incentive Schemes 117 Appendix C Generator information 118 Appendix D Distribution network reliability performance measures and results 120 Appendix E Power quality planning levels 123 TASNETWORKS ANNUAL PLANNING REPORT 2020 1 1. Introduction Tasmania is increasing its contribution to a This transition, with the move to increased low cost, renewable energy based electricity interconnection and variable renewable energy sector and being a major contributor to generation, is fundamentally changing how the firming electricity supply across the National power system operates. We, in conjunction with Electricity Market (NEM). As a key part of this the broader Tasmanian electricity industry, have objective, we present the Tasmanian Networks Pty managed this situation well to date, however the Ltd (TasNetworks) Annual Planning Report (APR). diligence must continue and solutions to new As the Tasmanian jurisdictional Transmission and challenges identified to keep pace with change. -
Caracterización Biológica Del Molusco Protegido Patella Ferruginea Gmelin, 1791 (Gastropoda: Patellidae): Bases Para Su Gestión Y Conservación
CARACTERIZACIÓN BIOLÓGICA DEL MOLUSCO PROTEGIDO PATELLA FERRUGINEA GMELIN, 1791 (GASTROPODA: PATELLIDAE): BASES PARA SU GESTIÓN Y CONSERVACIÓN. LABORATORIO DE BIOLOGÍA MARINA- UNIVERSIDAD DE SEVILLA Free Espinosa Torre D. JOSÉ MANUEL GUERRA GARCÍA, PROFESOR AYUDANTE DEL DEPARTAMENTO DE FISIOLOGÍA Y ZOOLOGÍA DE LA UNIVERSIDAD DE SEVILLA, D. DARREN FA, SUBDIRECTOR DEL ‘GIBRALTAR MUSEUM’ Y D. JOSÉ CARLOS GARCÍA GÓMEZ, PROFESOR TITULAR DEL DEPARTAMENTO DE FISIOLOGÍA Y ZOOLOGÍA DE LA UNIVERSIDAD DE SEVILLA CERTIFICAN QUE: D. FREE ESPINOSA TORRE, licenciado en Biología, ha realizado bajo su dirección y en el Departamento de Fisiología y Zoología de la Universidad de Sevilla, la memoria titulada “Caracterización biológica del molusco protegido Patella ferruginea Gmelin, 1791 (Gastropoda: Patellidae): bases para su gestión y conservación”, reuniendo el mismo las condiciones necesarias para optar al grado de doctor. Sevilla, 24 de octubre de 2005 Vº Bº de los directores: Fdo. José Manuel Guerra García Fdo. Darren Fa Fdo. José Carlos García Gómez El interesado: Fdo. Free Espinosa Torre A toda mi familia “Ingenuity and inventiveness in the development of methods have been very successful in finding ways to extract signals from the intrinsic noise of the system.” A. J. UNDERWOOD “Patella ferruginea lineis pullis angulatis undulative cingulique albis picta intus lactea; itriis elevatis nodolis, margine plicato.” GMELIN, 1791 AGRADECIMIENTOS Resulta extraño escribir estas líneas después de todo este tiempo, ya que representa el final de un trabajo que no hubiera sido posible sin la ayuda de todas las personas que a continuación citaré, pido disculpas de antemano si olvidase a alguien, espero que sepa perdonarme. En primer lugar quisiera agradecer a mis directores de tesis José Manuel Guerra García, Darren Fa y José Carlos García Gómez por haberme ayudado a completar este camino, dándome primero la oportunidad de realizar esta tesis y apoyándome en todo momento durante su desarrollo y por ser además unos buenos amigos. -
Download Full Article 2.0MB .Pdf File
Memoirs of the National Museum of Victoria 12 April 1971 Port Phillip Bay Survey 2 https://doi.org/10.24199/j.mmv.1971.32.08 8 INTERTIDAL ECOLOGY OF PORT PHILLIP BAY WITH SYSTEMATIC LIST OF PLANTS AND ANIMALS By R. J. KING,* J. HOPE BLACKt and SOPHIE c. DUCKER* Abstract The zonation is recorded at 14 stations within Port Phillip Bay. Any special features of a station arc di�cusscd in �elation to the adjacent stations and the whole Bay. The intertidal plants and ammals are listed systematically with references, distribution within the Bay and relevant comment. 1. INTERTIDAL ECOLOGY South-western Bay-Areas 42, 49, 50 By R. J. KING and J. HOPE BLACK Arca 42: Station 21 St. Leonards 16 Oct. 69 Introduction Arca 49: Station 4 Swan Bay Jetty, 17 Sept. 69 This account is basically coneerncd with the distribution of intertidal plants and animals of Eastern Bay-Areas 23-24, 35-36, 47-48, 55 Port Phillip Bay. The benthic flora and fauna Arca 23, Station 20, Ricketts Pt., 30 Sept. 69 have been dealt with in separate papers (Mem Area 55: Station 15 Schnapper Pt. 25 May oir 27 and present volume). 70 Following preliminary investigations, 14 Area 55: Station 13 Fossil Beach 25 May stations were selected for detailed study in such 70 a way that all regions and all major geological formations were represented. These localities Southern Bay-Areas 60-64, 67-70 are listed below and are shown in Figure 1. Arca 63: Station 24 Martha Pt. 25 May 70 For ease of comparison with Womersley Port Phillip Heads-Areas 58-59 (1966), in his paper on the subtidal algae, the Area 58: Station 10 Quecnscliff, 12 Mar.