The History of the 26Th Hamilton Scout Group
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
SPECIAL GENERAL ISSUES COMMITTEE LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT (LRT) MINUTES 16-026 10:30 A.M
SPECIAL GENERAL ISSUES COMMITTEE LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT (LRT) MINUTES 16-026 10:30 a.m. Tuesday, October 25, 2016 Council Chambers Hamilton City Hall 71 Main Street West ______________________________________________________________________ Present: Mayor F. Eisenberger, Deputy Mayor D. Skelly (Chair) Councillors T. Whitehead, T. Jackson, C. Collins, S. Merulla, M. Green, J. Farr, A. Johnson, D. Conley, M. Pearson, B. Johnson, L. Ferguson, R. Pasuta, J. Partridge Absent with Regrets: Councillor A. VanderBeek – Personal _____________________________________________________________________ THE FOLLOWING ITEMS WERE REFERRED TO COUNCIL FOR CONSIDERATION: 1. Light Rail Transit (LRT) Project Update (PED16199) (City Wide) (Item 5.1) (Conley/Pearson) That Report PED16199, respecting the Light Rail Transit (LRT) Project Update, be received. CARRIED 2. Hamilton Street Railway (HSR) Fare Integration (PW16066) (City Wide) (Item 6.1) (Eisenberger/Ferguson) That Report PW16066, respecting Hamilton Street Railway (HSR) Fare Integration, be received. CARRIED 3. Possibility of adding the LRT A-Line at the same time as building the B- Line (7.2) (Merulla/Whitehead) That staff be directed to communicate with Metrolinx to determine the possibility of adding the LRT A-Line at the same time as building the B-Line and report back to the LRT Sub-Committee. CARRIED General Issues Committee October 25, 2016 Minutes 16-026 Page 2 of 26 4. LRT Project Not to Negatively Affect Hamilton’s Allocation of Provincial Gas Tax Revenue or Future Federal Infrastructure Public Transit Funding (Item 7.3) (Collins/Merulla) That the Province of Ontario be requested to commit that the Hamilton Light Rail Transit (LRT) Project will not negatively affect Hamilton’s allocation of Provincial Gas Tax Funding or Future Federal Infrastructure Public Transit Funding. -
General Issues Committee Agenda Package
City of Hamilton GENERAL ISSUES COMMITTEE ADDENDUM Meeting #: 19-020 Date: October 16, 2019 Time: 9:30 a.m. Location: Council Chambers, Hamilton City Hall 71 Main Street West Stephanie Paparella, Legislative Coordinator (905) 546-2424 ext. 3993 6. DELEGATION REQUESTS *6.1 Nicole Smith, Extinction Rebellion Hamilton, respecting Item 11.1 - Feasibility of a Municipal Carbon Tax to Generate Revenue from Fossil Fuel Pipelines within the Boundaries of the City of Hamilton (For the October 16th GIC) *6.2 Mike Wood, Hamilton ACORN, respecting Item 10.7 - Barton Kenilworth Tax Increment Grant Program - 301-303 Barton Street East, Hamilton (PED19192) (For the October 16th GIC) 9. STAFF PRESENTATIONS *9.1 Investing in Canada Infrastructure Program - Community, Culture and Recreation Stream Intake (FCS19080) (City Wide) MOVED FROM ITEM 10.1 - PRESENTATION ADDED 12. NOTICES OF MOTION *12.1 Multi-Use Community Hub for Diverse and Marginalized Communities 14. PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL Page 2 of 30 *14.4 Airport Sub-Committee Report 19-004 - September 20, 2019 - Item 2 - REVISED Appendix "B" to TradePort / City Lease Negotiation Information Report (PED19084(a)) (City Wide) Pursuant to Section 8.1, Sub-section (k) of the City's Procedural By-law 18-270; and, Section 239(2), Sub-section (k) of the Ontario Municipal Act, 2001, as amended, as the subject matters pertain to a position, plan, procedure, criteria or instruction to be applied to any negotiations carried on or to be carried on by or on behalf of the municipality or local board. PLEASE REFER TO ITEM 10.2 FOR THE PUBLIC PORTION OF THIS REPORT. -
Randle Reef Sediment Remediation Project
Randle Reef Sediment Remediation Project Comprehensive Study Report Prepared for: Environment Canada Fisheries and Oceans Canada Transport Canada Hamilton Port Authority Prepared by: The Randle Reef Sediment Remediation Project Technical Task Group AECOM October 30, 2012 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The Randle Reef Sediment Remediation Project Technical Task Group Members: Roger Santiago, Environment Canada Erin Hartman, Environment Canada Rupert Joyner, Environment Canada Sue-Jin An, Environment Canada Matt Graham, Environment Canada Cheriene Vieira, Ontario Ministry of Environment Ron Hewitt, Public Works and Government Services Canada Bill Fitzgerald, Hamilton Port Authority The Technical Task Group gratefully acknowledges the contributions of the following parties in the preparation and completion of this document: Environment Canada, Fisheries and Oceans Canada, Transport Canada, Hamilton Port Authority, Health Canada, Public Works and Government Services Canada, Ontario Ministry of Environment, Canadian Environmental Assessment Act Agency, D.C. Damman and Associates, City of Hamilton, U.S. Steel Canada, National Water Research Institute, AECOM, ARCADIS, Acres & Associated Environmental Limited, Headwater Environmental Services Corporation, Project Advisory Group, Project Implementation Team, Bay Area Restoration Council, Hamilton Harbour Remedial Action Plan Office, Hamilton Conservation Authority, Royal Botanical Gardens and Halton Region Conservation Authority. TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................. -
Water Quality Monitoring
THE STORY OF THE CHEDOKE WATERSHED Monitoring Water Quality Summer 2015 Edward Berkelaar Darren Brouwer Janelle Vander Hout Nitrogen (N) & Phosphorous (P) THE STORY OF THE CHEDOKE WATERSHED Nitrogen (N) & Phosphorous (P) www.redeemer.ca/academics/offices- and-departments/our-faculty/edward- berkelaar/ - links to a talk on the history and environmental issues of our use of nitrogen THE STORY OF THE CHEDOKE WATERSHED Nutrient Atmosphere Cycling N2 + - Soil NH4 & NO3 + P fertilizers THE STORY OF THE CHEDOKE WATERSHED THE STORY OF THE CHEDOKE WATERSHED Cootes Paradise & Hamilton Harbor Stressed by high nutrient levels (among many other stressors) THE STORY OF THE CHEDOKE WATERSHED Water Quality Monitoring . Project-based learning in Analytical Chemistry course at Redeemer . Monitored multiple sites in Chedoke watershed . Fall 2012, Fall 2014, (Fall 2016) . Expanded water quality monitoring project last summer (2015) . Expanded number of sites . Weekly sampling THE STORY OF THE CHEDOKE WATERSHED Redeemer Water Monitoring Project www.redeemer.ca/academics/offices-and-departments/academic-departments/chemistry- and-environmental-studies-department/research THE STORY OF THE CHEDOKE WATERSHED THE STORY OF THE CHEDOKE WATERSHED Water Quality Monitoring . At the sample sites… . Temperature, pH, dissolved oxygen . Estimates of creek depth, width flow . In the lab… . Nitrate, phosphate, chloride . Organic matter (biological oxygen demand) . Bacteria (E. coli and total coliform) THE STORY OF THE CHEDOKE WATERSHED Phosphate Nitrate + Nitrite Scenic Falls Phosphate Nitrate + Nitrite Princess Falls Phosphate Nitrate + Nitrite Mountview Falls Phosphate Nitrate + Nitrite Sanatorium Falls Phosphate Nitrate + Nitrite Westcliffe Falls Phosphate Nitrate + Nitrite Cliffview Falls Phosphate Nitrate + Nitrite Chedoke Falls Phosphate Nitrate + Nitrite Princess Point Rain events Total Coliform Bacteria E. -
General Issues Committee Agenda Package
City of Hamilton GENERAL ISSUES COMMITTEE REVISED Meeting #: 19-004 Date: February 20, 2019 Time: 9:30 a.m. Location: Council Chambers, Hamilton City Hall 71 Main Street West Stephanie Paparella, Legislative Coordinator (905) 546-2424 ext. 3993 Pages 1. CEREMONIAL ACTIVITIES 1.1 Vic Djurdjevic - Tesla Medal Awarded, by the Tesla Science Foundation United States, to the City of Hamilton in Recognition of the City Support and Recognition of Nikola Tesla (no copy) 2. APPROVAL OF AGENDA (Added Items, if applicable, will be noted with *) 3. DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST 4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING 4.1 February 6, 2019 5 5. COMMUNICATIONS 6. DELEGATION REQUESTS 6.1 Tim Potocic, Supercrawl, to outline the current impact of the Festival to 35 the City of Hamilton (For the March 20, 2019 GIC) 6.2 Ed Smith, A Better Niagara, respecting the Niagara Peninsula 36 Conservation Authority (NPCA) (For the March 20, 2019 GIC) Page 2 of 198 7. CONSENT ITEMS 7.1 Barton Village Business Improvement Area (BIA) Revised Board of 37 Management (PED19037) (Wards 2 and 3) 7.2 Residential Special Event Parking Plan for the 2019 Canadian Open Golf 40 Tournament (PED19047) (Ward 12) 7.3 Public Art Master Plan 2016 Annual Update (PED19053) (City Wide) 50 8. PUBLIC HEARINGS / DELEGATIONS 8.1 Vic Djurdjevic, Nikola Tesla Educational Corporation, respecting the Tesla Educational Corporation Events and Activities (no copy) 9. STAFF PRESENTATIONS 9.1 2018 Annual Report on the 2016-2020 Economic Development Action 64 Plan Progress (PED19036) (City Wide) 10. DISCUSSION -
REPORT 16-026 10:30 A.M
SPECIAL GENERAL ISSUES COMMITTEE REPORT 16-026 10:30 a.m. Tuesday, October 25, 2016 Council Chambers Hamilton City Hall 71 Main Street West _________________________________________________________________________ Present: Mayor F. Eisenberger, Deputy Mayor D. Skelly (Chair) Councillors T. Whitehead, T. Jackson, C. Collins, S. Merulla, M. Green, J. Farr, A. Johnson, D. Conley, M. Pearson, B. Johnson, L. Ferguson, R. Pasuta, J. Partridge Absent with Regrets: Councillor A. VanderBeek – Personal _________________________________________________________________________ THE GENERAL ISSUES COMMITTEE PRESENTS REPORT 16-026 AND RESPECFULLY RECOMMENDS: 1. Light Rail Transit (LRT) Project Update (PED16199) (City Wide) (Item 5.1) That Report PED16199, respecting the Light Rail Transit (LRT) Project Update, be received. 2. Hamilton Street Railway (HSR) Fare Integration (PW16066) (City Wide) (Item 6.1) That Report PW16066, respecting Hamilton Street Railway (HSR) Fare Integration, be received. 3. Possibility of adding the LRT A-Line at the same time as building the B-Line (7.2) That staff be directed to communicate with Metrolinx to determine the possibility of adding the LRT A-Line at the same time as building the B-Line and report back to the LRT Sub-Committee. Council – November 9, 2016 General Issues Committee October 25, 2016 Report 16-026 Page 2 of 26 . 4. LRT Project Not to Negatively Affect Hamilton’s Allocation of Provincial Gas Tax Revenue or Future Federal Infrastructure Public Transit Funding (Item 7.3) That the Province of Ontario be requested to commit that the Hamilton Light Rail Transit (LRT) Project will not negatively affect Hamilton’s allocation of Provincial Gas Tax Funding or Future Federal Infrastructure Public Transit Funding 5. -
Capital Projects Works-In-Progress Review Sub-Committee Agenda Package
City of Hamilton CAPITAL PROJECTS WORK-IN-PROGRESS REVIEW SUB-COMMITTEE Meeting #: 20-001 Date: January 27, 2020 Time: 1:00 p.m. Location: Council Chambers, Hamilton City Hall 71 Main Street West Angela McRae, Legislative Coordinator (905) 546-2424 ext. 5987 Pages 1. CEREMONIAL ACTIVITIES 2. APPROVAL OF AGENDA (Added Items, if applicable, will be noted with *) 3. DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST 4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING 4.1 September 26, 2019 3 5. COMMUNICATIONS 6. DELEGATION REQUESTS 7. CONSENT ITEMS 8. PUBLIC HEARINGS / DELEGATIONS 9. STAFF PRESENTATIONS 10. DISCUSSION ITEMS 10.1 Capital Project Closing Report as of September 30, 2019 5 (FCS19078(a)) (City Wide) 10.2 Capital Projects Status Report (Excluding Public Works) as of 25 September 30, 2019 (FCS19079(a)) (City Wide) Page 2 of 144 10.3 Public Works - Capital Projects Status Report as of September 30, 2019 61 (FCS19077(a)) (City Wide) 11. MOTIONS 12. NOTICES OF MOTION 13. GENERAL INFORMATION / OTHER BUSINESS 14. PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL 15. ADJOURNMENT Page 3 of 144 4.1 CAPITAL PROJECTS WORK-IN-PROGRESS REVIEW SUB-COMMITTEE MINUTES 19-006 11:00 a.m. September 26, 2019 Council Chambers Hamilton City Hall Present: Councillors M. Pearson (Chair), J.P. Danko and N. Nann Absent: Councillor M Wilson – City Business THE FOLLOWING ITEMS WERE REFERRED TO THE GENERAL ISSUES COMMITTEE FOR CONSIDERATION: 1. Capital Projects Status Report (Excluding Public Works) as of June 30, 2019 (FCS19079) (City Wide) (Item 10.1) (Danko/Nann) That the Capital Projects Status Report (excluding Public Works), as of June 30, 2019, attached as Appendix “A” to Report FCS19079, be received. -
7.0 Design Considerations & Branding
Appendix A 7.0 DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS & BRANDING Report PW18053 7.0 DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS & BRANDING he Recreational Trails Master Plan (RTMP) recommends Ta network design that considers, among other elements, trail lighting, trail signage, trailheads and trail amenities (seating and rest areas, and bicycle parking), and public art along trails (See Chapter 3.1.2 Contextual Integration). In order to create a destination trail, these elements have been examined to create a consistent theme, or brand for the length of the trail. This section presents the recommended amenity and branding concept for the Mountain Brow Trail. 275 Appendix A MOUNTAIN BROW TRAIL FEASIBILITY MASTER PLAN Report PW18053 Interpretive signage at Hamilton Waterfront Trail 7.1 Trail Branding & Wayfinding One of the most important elements distances, key features), and rules and of the Mountain Brow Trail is ensuring regulations for the overall network. They that sections of the trail are built with a serve as a landmark for trail users. consistent brand and visual identity. This will help to create a cohesive, continuous • Route Confirmation & Directional and attractive facility. Signs – These signs assist trail users in Full Standard Logo locating and following along a particular As part of the feasibility master plan, an cycling facility, which may require turns. overall brand for the project has been They also confirm to users that they developed. The colours and logo identified are still on a specific cycling route, through the trail brand (Exhibit 31) can particularly on longer sections. be translated to a variety of wayfinding signage & pavement marking applications. • Interpretive Signage – Interpretive signage is typically placed at locations The following wayfinding & branding along trails that signify a historical Modified Logo signage elements should be considered feature, environmental feature, or feature for the Mountain Brow Trail, in accordance that is culturally significant to Canadian or with the Recreational Trails Master Plan: local heritage. -
Manufacturers and Industrial Development Policy in Hamilton, 1890-1910 Diana J
Document generated on 09/27/2021 1:09 a.m. Urban History Review Revue d'histoire urbaine Manufacturers and Industrial Development Policy in Hamilton, 1890-1910 Diana J. Middleton and David F. Walker Volume 8, Number 3, February 1980 Article abstract After failing to establish Hamilton as a major wholesaling centre, businessmen URI: https://id.erudit.org/iderudit/1019361ar in the city concentrated their attentions increasingly on the manufacturing DOI: https://doi.org/10.7202/1019361ar sector. City Council policies were extremely supportive of this focus, particularly in the period from 1890 to 1910, which is examined in this paper. See table of contents Manufacturers themselves, however, are shown to have played a minor role in Council's activities. None of the key figures in promoting pro-development policies in Hamilton were manufacturers, despite the fact that those policies Publisher(s) were designed primarily to stimulate manufacturing. At the forefront, rather, were professional men with business interests, supported mainly by Urban History Review / Revue d'histoire urbaine merchants. ISSN 0703-0428 (print) 1918-5138 (digital) Explore this journal Cite this article Middleton, D. J. & Walker, D. F. (1980). Manufacturers and Industrial Development Policy in Hamilton, 1890-1910. Urban History Review / Revue d'histoire urbaine, 8(3), 20–46. https://doi.org/10.7202/1019361ar All Rights Reserved © Urban History Review / Revue d'histoire urbaine, 1980 This document is protected by copyright law. Use of the services of Érudit (including reproduction) is subject to its terms and conditions, which can be viewed online. https://apropos.erudit.org/en/users/policy-on-use/ This article is disseminated and preserved by Érudit. -
Arts in the City: Visions of James Street North, 2005-2011
PhD Thesis – V. E. Sage McMaster University – Dept. of Anthropology VISIONS OF JAMES STREET NORTH PhD Thesis – V. E. Sage McMaster University – Dept. of Anthropology Title Page ARTS IN THE CITY: VISIONS OF JAMES STREET NORTH, 2005-2011 By VANESSSA E. SAGE, B.A., M.A. A Thesis Submitted to the School of Graduate Studies in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy McMaster University © Copyright by Vanessa E. Sage, September 2013 PhD Thesis – V. E. Sage McMaster University – Dept. of Anthropology Descriptive Note McMaster University DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY (2011) Hamilton, Ontario (Anthropology) TITLE: Arts in the City: Visions of James Street North, 2005-2011 AUTHOR: Vanessa E. Sage, B.A. (Waterloo University), B.A. (Cape Breton University), M.A. (Memorial University of Newfoundland) SUPERVISOR: Dr. Ellen Badone NUMBER OF PAGES: xii, 231 ii PhD Thesis – V. E. Sage McMaster University – Dept. of Anthropology Abstract I argue in this dissertation that aestheticizing urban landscapes represents an effort to create humane public environments in disenfranchised inner-city spaces, and turns these environments into culturally valued sites of pilgrimage. Specifically, I focus on James Street North, a neighbourhood undergoing artistic renewal in the post-industrial city of Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. Based on two years of ethnographic fieldwork in the arts scene on James Street North, my thesis claims that artistic activities serve as an ordinary, everyday material response to the perceived and real challenges of poverty, crime and decay in downtown Hamilton. Aesthetic elaboration is a generative and tangible expression by arts stakeholders of their intangible hopes, desires, and dreams for the city. -
Q2 2018' and 'YTD 2018', Respectively)
SECOND QUARTER 2018 MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS STELCO HOLDINGS INC. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS OF STELCO HOLDINGS INC. This Management’s Discussion and Analysis (MD&A) is intended to enable a reader to assess Stelco Holdings Inc.’s (Stelco Holdings) results of operations and financial performance for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018 ('Q2 2018' and 'YTD 2018', respectively). Unless the context indicates otherwise, references to the “Company”, “Stelco”, “we”, “us” or “our” refer to Stelco Holdings and its consolidated subsidiaries, as applicable. This MD&A, which has been prepared as of July 31, 2018, should be read in conjunction with our unaudited interim consolidated financial statements and related notes for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018 as well as our MD&A for the period ended December 31, 2017 (2017 MD&A). Our June 30, 2018 unaudited interim consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with International Accounting Standard (IAS) 34, Interim Financial Reporting and are presented in millions of Canadian dollars unless otherwise indicated. These documents, as well as additional information relating to the Company, including our 2017 Annual Information Form for the year ended December 31, 2017 (2017 AIF), have been filed electronically with the Canadian securities regulators through the System for Electronic Document Analysis and Retrieval (SEDAR) and are available through the SEDAR website at www.sedar.com. FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION Certain information included in this MD&A contains forward-looking information within the meaning of applicable securities laws. This information includes, but is not limited to, statements made in our “Business Overview”; “Strategy"; “Review of Balance Sheets”; “Capital Resources and Liquidity”; "Dividend Policy"; “Risk and Uncertainties” sections of this MD&A and in the “Risk Factors” section in the 2017 AIF. -
Water Quality Monitoring of the Chedoke Creek Watershed Analytical Chemistry, Fall 2014, Redeemer University College
Water Quality Monitoring of the Chedoke Creek Watershed Analytical Chemistry, Fall 2014, Redeemer University College What we did and why: The lab portion of our analytical chemistry course focused on monitoring the quality of water at different locations throughout the Chedoke Creek watershed which drains into Cootes Paradise (highlighted in blue in the map below). Over the past decades, significant efforts have gone into restoring Cootes Paradise to its original wetland, in hopes that plants, fish, birds, and other wildlife may thrive and flourish. However, Cootes Paradise suffers from a number of environmental stressors, including sewage contamination and excess nutrients coming from the wider watershed which can cause eutrophication, a condition in which there is undesirable algae growth and depletion of dissolved oxygen in the water. The Chedoke Creek and its tributaries run through a highly urbanized area of Hamilton and are known to be contaminated with sewage likely caused by cross-connections between sanitary and storm sewers in homes on Hamilton Mountain. By monitoring the water quality at specific locations within the watershed, we hope to raise awareness of this issue as well as to provide further information to quantify the problem and identify particular problem areas so that the City of Hamilton can continue to address this complex issue. How often and where: Throughout the semester, samples were collected on six occasions from five sites throughout the Chedoke Creek watershed, all along the Niagara Escarpment and easily accessible from the Chedoke Radial Trail (Bruce Trail). These sites included Scenic Falls, Princess Falls, Mountview Falls, Westcliffe & Cliffview Falls, and Chedoke Falls (see map below).