DOCSLIB.ORG

Relationships Between Nest-Dwelling Lepidoptera and Their Owl Hosts

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Ornithol Sci 11: 77 – 85 (2012) ORIGINAL ARTICLE Relationships between nest-dwelling Lepidoptera and their owl hosts Yoshitsugu NASU1,#, Shiro MURAHAMA2, Hiroyuki MATSUMURO3, Keisuke UEDA4, Toshiya HIROWATARI5 and Yutaka YOSHIYASU6 1 153–2, Nakado, Hashimoto, Wakayama 648–0023 Japan 2 Wildlife Conservation Laboratory Co. Ltd., 1–2–40–402, Miyahara, Yodogawa, Osaka 532–0003 Japan 3 Japan Bird Rescue Association, 3918, Oyamada-cho, Kawachinagano, Osaka 586–0094 Japan 4 College of Science, Rikkyo University, 3–34–1, Nishi-Ikebukuro, Toshima, Tokyo 171–8501 Japan 5 Entomological Laboratory, Osaka Prefecture University, 1–1, Gakuen-cho, Naka-ku, Sakai, Osaka 599–8531 Japan 6 Laboratory of Applied Entomology, Kyoto Prefectural University, Shimogamo, Kyoto 606–8522 Japan Abstract Lepidoptera fauna of five owl species nests were investigated in Japan. ORNITHOLOGICAL Seventeen moth species were identified: Niditinea striolella (Tineidae), Agonopterix SCIENCE sp. (Elachistidae) from Blakiston’s Fish Owl, Ketupa blakistoni, nests; Monopis lon- © The Ornithological Society gella (= pavlovskii), M. flavidorsalis, M. sp., M. congestella, Niditinea baryspilas, N. of Japan 2012 striolella, N. sp. (Tineidae), Martyringa ussuriella (Oecophoridae), Mabra charonia- lis (Crambidae), Pyralis regalis (Pyralidae) from Ural Owl, Strix uralensis, nests; Tinea translucens, Niditinea baryspilas (Tineidae) from Brown Hawk-Owl, Ninox scutulata, nests; Opogona sacchari, O. sp., Phaeoses sp. (Tineidae) from Collared Scops Owl, Otus lempiji, nests; and Opogona sacchari, Phaeoses sp., Setomorpha sp. (Tineidae), Endotricha theonalis (Pyralidae) from Ryukyu Scops Owl, Otus elegans, nests. The moth nest fauna varied among owl species. The differences were related to owl prey (fish, small animals and birds, insects) and habitats (urban area, forest), and the tineid species selecting the nest. Tineids are presumed to decompose keratin found in owl nests and help maintain the cleanliness of the nest chamber, and such relationships between tineids and owls may be mutualistic. Rapid burrowing into owl nest materi- als by tineids may reflect a strategy to avoid being preyed upon by the nest owners. Key words Detritus, Ecosystem engineer, Nest-dwelling, Symbiosis, Tineidae Birds modify their environments by activities such alba (Hicks 1959), and five species of Tineidae have as nest construction, and hence act as ecosystem been found in the nests of Finnish Ural Owl, Strix engineers (Jones et al. 1994). Other organisms, espe- uralensis (Jalava 1980). cially insects, utilize bird nests as habitats (Nordberg From 2006 to 2011, the lepidopteran fauna in the 1936; Woodroffe 1953; Hicks 1959, 1962; Whelan et nests of five owl species: Blakiston’s Fish Owl, Ket- al. 2008); however, few studies have focused on the upa blakistoni, Ural Owl, Brown Hawk-Owl, Ninox relationships between insects and birds. scutulata, Collared Scops Owl, Otus lempiji, and Only fragmentary investigations have been made Ryukyu Scops Owl, O. elegans, was surveyed in of Lepidoptera in owl nests; nevertheless, Tinea sp. Japan. As a result of the investigations, 17 moth spe- (Tineidae), Gerdana sp. (Blastobasidae) and Alucita cies were identified (12 tineids, one oecophorid, one huebneri (Alucitidae) have been reported from nests elachistid, two pyralids and one crambid) of which, of North American Long-eared Owl, Asio otus, Hof- five tineids and one oecophorid had been reported mannophila pseudopretella (Oecophoridae) has been previously from Ural Owl nests by Nasu et al. (2007a, noted from the nests of European Barn Owl, Tyto 2008) and Huang et al. (2011). Here we provide data on the 17 moth species found, and discuss the role of (Received 26 March 2012; Accepted 6 May 2012) owls as ecosystem engineers and the relationships # Corresponding author, E-mail: [email protected] between the moths and the birds. 77 Y. NASU et al. Fig. 1. Map of owl nest localities, Japan. MATERIALS AND METHODS All of the moth specimens are preserved in the collection of the Entomological laboratory of Osaka Detritus was collected from the bottom of a range Prefecture University, Sakai, Osaka, Japan. of natural nests, and detritus and wood chip remains (provided as artificial nest material) was collected RESULTS from nest boxes from which young owls fledged (see Fig. 1). The detritus was put into rearing cases at 1) Blakiston’s Fish Owl 25°C in an incubator or at room temperature with a Two nests supported the tineid moth Niditinea stri- natural photoperiod cycle, the larvae in the detritus olella (Fig. 2g), and similarly two nests supported the were allowed to develop and the adult moths that elachistid moth Agonopterix sp. (Fig. 2n; Table 1). In emerged were then identified. addition, two tineid larvae, probably N. striolella, Most owl nests studied were in forests, although were found in one nest. The nest detritus consisted Brown Hawk-Owl nests were in urban areas. The mainly of decaying wood chips, a few owl down nest numbers and dates were as follows: Blakiston’s feathers, and fish scales. Fish Owl: in 2007–2011, one natural nest and 13 nest boxes were investigated in Hokkaido (for con- 2) Ural Owl servation reasons exact nest localities are not given Moths were incubated from most nests, with a this endangered species); Ural Owl: in 2006–2011, range of species represented: seven tineids, four two natural nests and 57 nest boxes in 21 localities, Monopis including an unknown species (Fig. 2c), 11 prefectures; Brown Hawk-Owl: in 2009 and 2010, three Niditinea including an unknown species (Fig. five natural nests and one nest box in six localities, 2i), one oecophorid, Martyringa ussuriella (Fig. 2m), three prefectures; Collared Scops Owl: in 2007 and one crambid, Mabra charonialis (Fig. 2o) and one 2008, nine nest boxes in Kunigami-son, Okinawa Is., pyralid, Pyralis regalis (Fig. 2p; Table 2). Of these, Okinawa Prefecture; Ryukyu Scops Owl: in 2007 and Monopis longella (= pavlovskii) (Fig. 2a), M. flavi- 2008, six nest boxes in Kunigami-son, Okinawa Is., dorsalis (Fig. 2b), M. congestella (Fig. 2d), Niditinea Okinawa Prefecture, and in 2007–2009, nine natural baryspilas (Fig. 2f) and N. striolella predominated. A nests and two nest boxes on Minami-daito Is., great number of Monopis longella were reared, with Okinawa Prefecture. over 328 moths per nest. From the nest detritus col- 78 Nest-dwelling Lepidoptera and owls Fig. 2. Lepidoptera from owl nests (a-l, Tineidae; m, Oecophoridae; n, Elachistidae; o, Crambidae; p, q, Pyralidae). a, Monopis longella (= pavlovskii); b, M. flavidorsalis; c, M. sp.; d, M. congestella; e, Tinea translucens; f, Niditinea baryspilas; g, N. striolella; h, Opogona sacchari; i, Niditinea sp.; j, Opogona sp.; k, Phaeoses sp.; l, Setomorpha sp.; m, Martyringa ussuriella; n, Agonopterix sp.; o, Mabra charonialis; p, Pyralis regalis; q, Endotricha theonalis. Table 1. Number of Lepidoptera from Blakiston’s Fish Owl, Ketupa blakistoni, nests in Japan. Date detritus Tineidae Elachistidae Locality Nest collected Niditinea striolella larval case Agonopterix sp. Hokkaido Nest box Oct. 26, 2007 6* 2*** Oct. 26, 2007 10* 1*** Aug. 11, 2011 2** * larvae, moths developed in Feb., 2008; ** probably Niditinea striolella; *** adults. 79 Table 2. Number of Lepidoptera from Ural Owl, Strix uralensis, nests in Japan. Tineidae Oecophoridae Pyralidae Crambidae Date detritus Locality Nest collected Monopis longella Monopis Monopis Monopis Niditinea Niditinea Niditinea Martyringa Pyralis Mabra (= pavlovskii) flavidorsalis sp. congestella baryspilas striolella sp. ussuriella regalis charonialis Aomori Aomori Natural nest Jul. 9, 2007 1 Yamanashi Fujiyoshida Nest box May 2, 2007* 115 + May 8, 2007** 2 Nagano Nagano Nest box Jul. 20, 2009 7+ 5+ 1+ Aichi Okazaki Nest box Jun. 26, 2007 37 80 59 Jun. 26, 2007 328+ 12 Jul. 12, 2009 28+ 6+ 58+ Jul. 12, 2009 7+ 1+ Jul. 17, 2010 18 6 Toyota Nest box Jul. 17, 2010 13+ 57+ Jul. 17, 2010 1 1 Nishio Nest box Jul. 12, 2009 9+ 1+ Kira Nest box Jul. 12, 2009 25+ 38+ 5+ Kouda Nest box Jul. 12, 2009 64+ 1+ Shiga Takashima Nest box Sep. 29, 2006 2 Jul. 7, 2007 26 6 18 5 NASUetal. Y. Jul. 4, 2009 11 + 1+ 6+ 1+ 1+ Kyoto Ujitabaru Nest box Jul. 12, 2009 8+ 1+ 9+ 1+ 1+ 80 Nara Ikoma Nest box Jul. 11, 2010 2 Osaka Minoh Nest box Jun. 25, 2006 40+ 2 Jun. 16, 2007 6 Aug. 8, 2010 2 3 Hirakata Nest box Jun. 25, 2006 14 100+ 1 Jun. 16, 2007 3 1 Jun. 16, 2007 5 23 Jul. 6, 2008 166 1 18 22 Jul. 18, 2009 43 9 66 11 1 Aug. 8, 2010 71 2 Shijonawate Nest box Jul. 6, 2008 36 30+ Jul. 6, 2008 24 23 Katano Natural nest Jun. 16, 2007 1 Daito Nest box Jun. 6, 2008 8 8 40 Kawachinagano Nest box Jul. 19, 2009 1 5 Aug. 7, 2010 2 Aug. 7, 2010 8 9 58 Jul. 9, 2011 5 Wakayama Hashimoto Nest box Jun. 17, 2006 100+ 1 3 Aug. 26, 2007 1 Aug. 26, 2007*** 2 Jul. 9, 2011 2+ 5 Miyazaki Miyakonojo Nest box Aug. 1, 2010 13 3 * nest detritus in 2006; ** nest reused by Parus spp.; *** nest reused by Petaurista leucogenys Nest-dwelling Lepidoptera and owls Table 3. Number of Lepidoptera from Brown Hawk-Owl, Ninox scutulata, nests in Japan. Tineidae Date detritus Locality Nest collected Tinea Niditinea translucens baryspilas Kyoto Kyoto Nest box Oct. 15, 2010 1 Miyazaki Miyakonojo Natural nest Aug. 1, 2009 10+* Miyazaki Aug. 3, 2009 2 22+ * larvae Table 4. Number of Lepidotpera from scops owls, Otus spp., nests in Okinawa, Japan. Tineidae Pyralidae Date detritus Owls Locality Nest collected Opogona Opogona Phaeoses Setomor- Endotricha sacchari sp. sp. pha sp. theonalis Collared Kunigami, Nest box Jul. 8, 2007 1 Scops Owl, Okinawa Is. Jul. 8, 2007 3 1 Otus lempiji Jul. 19, 2007 1 4 Jul. 19, 2007 7+ Jul. 13, 2008 1 Ryukyu Kunigami, Nest box Jul. 15, 2008 2 2 Scops Owl, Okinawa Is.
Recommended publications
  • Table of Contents

    Table of Contents

    Table of Contents Plenary Using ecological site information to evaluate the probabilities and effects of Joel Brown Page 6 restoration Andrew Campbell The last four decades of land repair in Australia: what have we learnt? Page 6 Kingsley Dixon Restoring the island continent Page 6 Restoring species rich and functionally complex grassy communities – feasible Paul Gibson-Roy Page 7 or fiction? Pollination services in restoration – comparing intact and degraded Caroline Gross Page 7 communities provides assembly rules for restoring cleared landscapes Where to from here? Challenges for restoration and revegetation in a fast- Richard Hobbs Page 8 changing world Thomas Jones Ecosystem restoration: recent advances in theory and practice Page 8 Tein McDonald National standards for the practice of ecological restoration in Australia Page 9 David Norton Upscaling the restoration effort – a New Zealand perspective Page 9 A changing climate, considerations for future ecological management and Kristen Williams Page 10 restoration Keynote Linda Broadhurst Restoration genetics – how far have we come and we are we going? Page 10 Turquoise is the new green: riparian restoration and revegetation in the Samantha Capon Page 10 Anthropocene Carla Catterall Fauna: passengers and drivers in vegetation restoration Page 11 Veronica Doerr Landscape connectivity: do we have the right science to make a difference? Page 11 Josh Dorrough Grazing management for biodiversity conservation Page 12 Invasive species and their impacts on agri-ecosystems: issues and solutions
  • SYSTEMATICS of the MEGADIVERSE SUPERFAMILY GELECHIOIDEA (INSECTA: LEPIDOPTEA) DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of T

    SYSTEMATICS of the MEGADIVERSE SUPERFAMILY GELECHIOIDEA (INSECTA: LEPIDOPTEA) DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of T

    SYSTEMATICS OF THE MEGADIVERSE SUPERFAMILY GELECHIOIDEA (INSECTA: LEPIDOPTEA) DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for The Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Sibyl Rae Bucheli, M.S. ***** The Ohio State University 2005 Dissertation Committee: Approved by Dr. John W. Wenzel, Advisor Dr. Daniel Herms Dr. Hans Klompen _________________________________ Dr. Steven C. Passoa Advisor Graduate Program in Entomology ABSTRACT The phylogenetics, systematics, taxonomy, and biology of Gelechioidea (Insecta: Lepidoptera) are investigated. This superfamily is probably the second largest in all of Lepidoptera, and it remains one of the least well known. Taxonomy of Gelechioidea has been unstable historically, and definitions vary at the family and subfamily levels. In Chapters Two and Three, I review the taxonomy of Gelechioidea and characters that have been important, with attention to what characters or terms were used by different authors. I revise the coding of characters that are already in the literature, and provide new data as well. Chapter Four provides the first phylogenetic analysis of Gelechioidea to include molecular data. I combine novel DNA sequence data from Cytochrome oxidase I and II with morphological matrices for exemplar species. The results challenge current concepts of Gelechioidea, suggesting that traditional morphological characters that have united taxa may not be homologous structures and are in need of further investigation. Resolution of this problem will require more detailed analysis and more thorough characterization of certain lineages. To begin this task, I conduct in Chapter Five an in- depth study of morphological evolution, host-plant selection, and geographical distribution of a medium-sized genus Depressaria Haworth (Depressariinae), larvae of ii which generally feed on plants in the families Asteraceae and Apiaceae.
  • Entomology of the Aucklands and Other Islands South of New Zealand: Lepidoptera, Ex­ Cluding Non-Crambine Pyralidae

    Entomology of the Aucklands and Other Islands South of New Zealand: Lepidoptera, Ex­ Cluding Non-Crambine Pyralidae

    Pacific Insects Monograph 27: 55-172 10 November 1971 ENTOMOLOGY OF THE AUCKLANDS AND OTHER ISLANDS SOUTH OF NEW ZEALAND: LEPIDOPTERA, EX­ CLUDING NON-CRAMBINE PYRALIDAE By J. S. Dugdale1 CONTENTS Introduction 55 Acknowledgements 58 Faunal Composition and Relationships 58 Faunal List 59 Key to Families 68 1. Arctiidae 71 2. Carposinidae 73 Coleophoridae 76 Cosmopterygidae 77 3. Crambinae (pt Pyralidae) 77 4. Elachistidae 79 5. Geometridae 89 Hyponomeutidae 115 6. Nepticulidae 115 7. Noctuidae 117 8. Oecophoridae 131 9. Psychidae 137 10. Pterophoridae 145 11. Tineidae... 148 12. Tortricidae 156 References 169 Note 172 Abstract: This paper deals with all Lepidoptera, excluding the non-crambine Pyralidae, of Auckland, Campbell, Antipodes and Snares Is. The native resident fauna of these islands consists of 42 species of which 21 (50%) are endemic, in 27 genera, of which 3 (11%) are endemic, in 12 families. The endemic fauna is characterised by brachyptery (66%), body size under 10 mm (72%) and concealed, or strictly ground- dwelling larval life. All species can be related to mainland forms; there is a distinctive pre-Pleistocene element as well as some instances of possible Pleistocene introductions, as suggested by the presence of pairs of species, one member of which is endemic but fully winged. A graph and tables are given showing the composition of the fauna, its distribution, habits, and presumed derivations. Host plants or host niches are discussed. An additional 7 species are considered to be non-resident waifs. The taxonomic part includes keys to families (applicable only to the subantarctic fauna), and to genera and species.
  • Lepidoptera of North America 5

    Lepidoptera of North America 5

    Lepidoptera of North America 5. Contributions to the Knowledge of Southern West Virginia Lepidoptera Contributions of the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity Colorado State University Lepidoptera of North America 5. Contributions to the Knowledge of Southern West Virginia Lepidoptera by Valerio Albu, 1411 E. Sweetbriar Drive Fresno, CA 93720 and Eric Metzler, 1241 Kildale Square North Columbus, OH 43229 April 30, 2004 Contributions of the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity Colorado State University Cover illustration: Blueberry Sphinx (Paonias astylus (Drury)], an eastern endemic. Photo by Valeriu Albu. ISBN 1084-8819 This publication and others in the series may be ordered from the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity, Department of Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest Management Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523 Abstract A list of 1531 species ofLepidoptera is presented, collected over 15 years (1988 to 2002), in eleven southern West Virginia counties. A variety of collecting methods was used, including netting, light attracting, light trapping and pheromone trapping. The specimens were identified by the currently available pictorial sources and determination keys. Many were also sent to specialists for confirmation or identification. The majority of the data was from Kanawha County, reflecting the area of more intensive sampling effort by the senior author. This imbalance of data between Kanawha County and other counties should even out with further sampling of the area. Key Words: Appalachian Mountains,
  • Lepidoptera: Tineidae) from Chinazoj 704 1..14

    Lepidoptera: Tineidae) from Chinazoj 704 1..14

    Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2011, 163, 1–14. With 5 figures A revision of the Monopis monachella species complex (Lepidoptera: Tineidae) from Chinazoj_704 1..14 GUO-HUA HUANG1*, LIU-SHENG CHEN2, TOSHIYA HIROWATARI3, YOSHITSUGU NASU4 and MING WANG5 1Institute of Entomology, College of Bio-safety Science and Technology, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha 410128, Hunan Province, China. E-mail: [email protected] 2College of Agriculture, Shihezi University, Shihezi 832800, Xinjiang, China. E-mail: [email protected] 3Entomological Laboratory, Graduate School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Osaka Prefecture University, Sakai 599-8531, Osaka, Japan. E-mail: [email protected] 4Osaka Plant Protection Office: Habikino, Osaka 583-0862, Japan. E-mail: [email protected] 5Department of Entomology, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510640, Guangdong Province, China. E-mail: [email protected] Received 19 March 2010; revised 21 September 2010; accepted for publication 24 September 2010 The Monopis monachella species complex from China is revised, and its relationship to other species complexes of the genus Monopis is discussed with reference to morphological, and molecular evidence. Principal component analysis on all available specimens provided supporting evidence for the existence of three species, one of which is described as new: Monopis iunctio Huang & Hirowatari sp. nov. All species are either diagnosed or described, and illustrated, and information is given on their distribution and host range. Additional information is given on the biology and larval stages of Monopis longella. A preliminary phylogenetic study based on mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I gene (CO1) sequence data and a key to the species of the M.
  • Report-VIC-Croajingolong National Park-Appendix A

    Report-VIC-Croajingolong National Park-Appendix A

    Croajingolong National Park, Victoria, 2016 Appendix A: Fauna species lists Family Species Common name Mammals Acrobatidae Acrobates pygmaeus Feathertail Glider Balaenopteriae Megaptera novaeangliae # ~ Humpback Whale Burramyidae Cercartetus nanus ~ Eastern Pygmy Possum Canidae Vulpes vulpes ^ Fox Cervidae Cervus unicolor ^ Sambar Deer Dasyuridae Antechinus agilis Agile Antechinus Dasyuridae Antechinus mimetes Dusky Antechinus Dasyuridae Sminthopsis leucopus White-footed Dunnart Felidae Felis catus ^ Cat Leporidae Oryctolagus cuniculus ^ Rabbit Macropodidae Macropus giganteus Eastern Grey Kangaroo Macropodidae Macropus rufogriseus Red Necked Wallaby Macropodidae Wallabia bicolor Swamp Wallaby Miniopteridae Miniopterus schreibersii oceanensis ~ Eastern Bent-wing Bat Muridae Hydromys chrysogaster Water Rat Muridae Mus musculus ^ House Mouse Muridae Rattus fuscipes Bush Rat Muridae Rattus lutreolus Swamp Rat Otariidae Arctocephalus pusillus doriferus ~ Australian Fur-seal Otariidae Arctocephalus forsteri ~ New Zealand Fur Seal Peramelidae Isoodon obesulus Southern Brown Bandicoot Peramelidae Perameles nasuta Long-nosed Bandicoot Petauridae Petaurus australis Yellow Bellied Glider Petauridae Petaurus breviceps Sugar Glider Phalangeridae Trichosurus cunninghami Mountain Brushtail Possum Phalangeridae Trichosurus vulpecula Common Brushtail Possum Phascolarctidae Phascolarctos cinereus Koala Potoroidae Potorous sp. # ~ Long-nosed or Long-footed Potoroo Pseudocheiridae Petauroides volans Greater Glider Pseudocheiridae Pseudocheirus peregrinus
  • How to Control Soil Insects with Beneficial Nematodes

    How to Control Soil Insects with Beneficial Nematodes

    How to Control Soil Insects with Beneficial Nematodes Ed Lewis Department of Entomology and Nematology University of California, Davis Using Microbials in IPM • Do not have to change everything about crop management • Many microbial insecticides fit into current production plans with minimal effort and change • They require specialized information about their use Insect pathogens can be effective • Naturally occur – Even in intensively managed systems • Have an impact on insect populations at natural levels Necessary information: Products • Shelf life • Storage conditions • Resting stage? • Viability in field • Host range • Time to kill • What does an infected insect look like? Recognized Species of Entomopathogenic Nematodes H. bacteriophora H. marelatus H. brevicaudis H. megidis H. hawaiiensis H. zealandica H. indica H. argentinensis S. kraussei S. karii S. arenarium S. kushidai S. bicornutum S. longicaudum S. carpocapsae S. monticolum S. caudatum S. neocurtillae S. ceratophorum S. oregonense S. cubanum S. puertoricense S. feltiae S. rarum S. glaseri S. riobrave S. intermedium S. ritteri S. affine S. scapterisci Infective Juveniles • Resistant to Environmental Extremes • Only Function is to Find A New Host • No Feeding • No Development • No Reproduction • Only Life Stage Outside the Host Infective Stage Juvenile Steinernema carpocapsae Symbiotic Bacteria Released Bacterial Chamber Mating for Steinernema spp. Two to three generations occur in a single host. About 6 days after the original infection, this is the appearance New Infective Juveniles in 10 Days Entomopathogenic Nematodes Can Control: • Weevils: Diaprepes root weevil, Diaprepes abbreviatus Blue green weevils, Pachnaeus spp. Otiorhynchus spp. Bill bugs • Fungus gnats: e.g., Sciaridae Entomopathogenic Nematodes Can Control: • Scarab larvae: e.g., Japanese beetle, Popillia japonica, Chafers, etc.
  • 210 Part 319—Foreign Quarantine Notices

    210 Part 319—Foreign Quarantine Notices

    § 318.82–3 7 CFR Ch. III (1–1–03 Edition) The movement of plant pests, means of 319.8–20 Importations by the Department of conveyance, plants, plant products, and Agriculture. other products and articles from Guam 319.8–21 Release of cotton and covers after into or through any other State, Terri- 18 months’ storage. 319.8–22 Ports of entry or export. tory, or District is also regulated by 319.8–23 Treatment. part 330 of this chapter. 319.8–24 Collection and disposal of waste. 319.8–25 Costs and charges. § 318.82–3 Costs. 319.8–26 Material refused entry. All costs incident to the inspection, handling, cleaning, safeguarding, treat- Subpart—Sugarcane ing, or other disposal of products or ar- 319.15 Notice of quarantine. ticles under this subpart, except for the 319.15a Administrative instructions and in- services of an inspector during regu- terpretation relating to entry into Guam larly assigned hours of duty and at the of bagasse and related sugarcane prod- usual places of duty, shall be borne by ucts. the owner. Subpart—Citrus Canker and Other Citrus PART 319—FOREIGN QUARANTINE Diseases NOTICES 319.19 Notice of quarantine. Subpart—Foreign Cotton and Covers Subpart—Corn Diseases QUARANTINE QUARANTINE Sec. 319.24 Notice of quarantine. 319.8 Notice of quarantine. 319.24a Administrative instructions relating 319.8a Administrative instructions relating to entry of corn into Guam. to the entry of cotton and covers into Guam. REGULATIONS GOVERNING ENTRY OF INDIAN CORN OR MAIZE REGULATIONS; GENERAL 319.24–1 Applications for permits for impor- 319.8–1 Definitions.
  • Incipient Non-Adaptive Radiation by Founder Effect? Oliarus Polyphemus Fennah, 1973 – a Subterranean Model Case

    Incipient Non-Adaptive Radiation by Founder Effect? Oliarus Polyphemus Fennah, 1973 – a Subterranean Model Case

    Incipient non-adaptive radiation by founder effect? Oliarus polyphemus Fennah, 1973 – a subterranean model case. (Hemiptera: Fulgoromorpha: Cixiidae) Dissertation zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades doctor rerum naturalium (Dr. rer. nat.) im Fach Biologie eingereicht an der Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftlichen Fakultät I der Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin von Diplom-Biologe Andreas Wessel geb. 30.11.1973 in Berlin Präsident der Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin Prof. Dr. Christoph Markschies Dekan der Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftlichen Fakultät I Prof. Dr. Lutz-Helmut Schön Gutachter/innen: 1. Prof. Dr. Hannelore Hoch 2. Prof. Dr. Dr. h.c. mult. Günter Tembrock 3. Prof. Dr. Kenneth Y. Kaneshiro Tag der mündlichen Prüfung: 20. Februar 2009 Incipient non-adaptive radiation by founder effect? Oliarus polyphemus Fennah, 1973 – a subterranean model case. (Hemiptera: Fulgoromorpha: Cixiidae) Doctoral Thesis by Andreas Wessel Humboldt University Berlin 2008 Dedicated to Francis G. Howarth, godfather of Hawai'ian cave ecosystems, and to the late Hampton L. Carson, who inspired modern population thinking. Ua mau ke ea o ka aina i ka pono. Zusammenfassung Die vorliegende Arbeit hat sich zum Ziel gesetzt, den Populationskomplex der hawai’ischen Höhlenzikade Oliarus polyphemus als Modellsystem für das Stu- dium schneller Artenbildungsprozesse zu erschließen. Dazu wurde ein theoretischer Rahmen aus Konzepten und daraus abgeleiteten Hypothesen zur Interpretation be- kannter Fakten und Erhebung neuer Daten entwickelt. Im Laufe der Studie wurde zur Erfassung geografischer Muster ein GIS (Geographical Information System) erstellt, das durch Einbeziehung der historischen Geologie eine präzise zeitliche Einordnung von Prozessen der Habitatsukzession erlaubt. Die Muster der biologi- schen Differenzierung der Populationen wurden durch morphometrische, etho- metrische (bioakustische) und molekulargenetische Methoden erfasst.
  • Terrestrial Arthropod Surveys on Pagan Island, Northern Marianas

    Terrestrial Arthropod Surveys on Pagan Island, Northern Marianas

    Terrestrial Arthropod Surveys on Pagan Island, Northern Marianas Neal L. Evenhuis, Lucius G. Eldredge, Keith T. Arakaki, Darcy Oishi, Janis N. Garcia & William P. Haines Pacific Biological Survey, Bishop Museum, Honolulu, Hawaii 96817 Final Report November 2010 Prepared for: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Pacific Islands Fish & Wildlife Office Honolulu, Hawaii Evenhuis et al. — Pagan Island Arthropod Survey 2 BISHOP MUSEUM The State Museum of Natural and Cultural History 1525 Bernice Street Honolulu, Hawai’i 96817–2704, USA Copyright© 2010 Bishop Museum All Rights Reserved Printed in the United States of America Contribution No. 2010-015 to the Pacific Biological Survey Evenhuis et al. — Pagan Island Arthropod Survey 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary ......................................................................................................... 5 Background ..................................................................................................................... 7 General History .............................................................................................................. 10 Previous Expeditions to Pagan Surveying Terrestrial Arthropods ................................ 12 Current Survey and List of Collecting Sites .................................................................. 18 Sampling Methods ......................................................................................................... 25 Survey Results ..............................................................................................................
  • List of the Lepidoptera of Black Sturgeon Lake, Northwestern Ontario, and Dates of Adult Occurrence

    List of the Lepidoptera of Black Sturgeon Lake, Northwestern Ontario, and Dates of Adult Occurrence

    The Great Lakes Entomologist Volume 24 Number 1 - Spring 1991 Number 1 - Spring 1991 Article 8 March 1991 List of the Lepidoptera of Black Sturgeon Lake, Northwestern Ontario, and Dates of Adult Occurrence C. J. Sanders Forestry Canada Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.valpo.edu/tgle Part of the Entomology Commons Recommended Citation Sanders, C. J. 1991. "List of the Lepidoptera of Black Sturgeon Lake, Northwestern Ontario, and Dates of Adult Occurrence," The Great Lakes Entomologist, vol 24 (1) Available at: https://scholar.valpo.edu/tgle/vol24/iss1/8 This Peer-Review Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of Biology at ValpoScholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in The Great Lakes Entomologist by an authorized administrator of ValpoScholar. For more information, please contact a ValpoScholar staff member at [email protected]. Sanders: List of the Lepidoptera of Black Sturgeon Lake, Northwestern Onta 1991 THE GREAT LAKES ENTOMOLOGIST 51 LIST OF THE LEPIDOPTERA OF BLACK STURGEON LAKE, NORTHWESTERN ONTARIO, AND DATES OF ADULT OCCURRENCE C.J. SandersI ABSTRACT From May to September each year from 1960 through 1968, a collection of Lepidoptera was made at Black Sturgeon Lake, northwestern Ontario, from speci­ mens captured in a light trap and from specimens netted during the day. A total of 564 species was recorded from 70 families. A list of the species with dates of capture is presented. From 1960 through 1968, a 15-watt black-light trap was operated each year at a Forestry Canada field station at Black Sturgeon Lake, northwestern Ontario.
  • その他の昆虫類 Other Miscellaneous Insects 高橋和弘 1) Kazuhiro Takahashi

    その他の昆虫類 Other Miscellaneous Insects 高橋和弘 1) Kazuhiro Takahashi

    丹沢大山総合調査学術報告書 丹沢大山動植物目録 （2007） その他の昆虫類 Other Miscellaneous Insects 高橋和弘 1) Kazuhiro Takahashi 要 約 今回の目録に示した各目ごとの種数は， 次のとおりである． カマアシムシ目 10 種 ナナフシ目 5 種 ヘビトンボ目 3 種 トビムシ目 19 種 ハサミムシ目 5 種 ラクダムシ目 2 種 イシノミ目 1 種 カマキリ目 3 種 アミメカゲロウ目 55 種 カゲロウ目 61 種 ゴキブリ目 4 種 シリアゲムシ目 13 種 トンボ目 62 種 シロアリ目 1 種 チョウ目 （ガ類） 1756 種 カワゲラ目 52 種 チャタテムシ目 11 種 トビケラ目 110 種 ガロアムシ目 1 種 カメムシ目 （異翅亜目除く） 501 種 バッタ目 113 種 アザミウマ目 19 種 凡 例 清川村丹沢山 （Imadate & Nakamura, 1989） . 1. 本報では、 カゲロウ目を石綿進一、 カワゲラ目を石塚 新、 トビ ミヤマカマアシムシ Yamatentomon fujisanum Imadate ケラ目を野崎隆夫が執筆し、 他の丹沢大山総合調査報告書生 清川村丹沢堂平 （Imadate, 1994） . 物目録の昆虫部門の中で諸般の事情により執筆者がいない分類 群について，既存の文献から，データを引用し、著者がまとめた。 文 献 特に重点的に参照した文献は 『神奈川県昆虫誌』（神奈川昆虫 Imadate, G., 1974. Protura Fauna Japonica. 351pp., Keigaku Publ. 談話会編 , 2004）※である． Co., Tokyo. ※神奈川昆虫談話会編 , 2004. 神奈川県昆虫誌 . 1438pp. 神 Imadate, G., 1993. Contribution towards a revision of the Proturan 奈川昆虫談話会 , 小田原 . Fauna of Japan (VIII) Further collecting records from northern 2. 各分類群の記述は， 各目ごとに分け， 引用文献もその目に関 and eastern Japan. Bulletin of the Department of General するものは， その末尾に示した． Education Tokyo Medical and Dental University, (23): 31-65. 2. 地名については， 原則として引用した文献に記されている地名 Imadate, G., 1994. Contribution towards a revision of the Proturan とした． しがって， 同一地点の地名であっても文献によっては異 Fauna of Japan (IX) Collecting data of acerentomid and なった表現となっている場合があるので， 注意していただきたい． sinentomid species in the Japanese Islands. Bulletin of the Department of General Education Tokyo Medical and Dental カマアシムシ目 Protura University, (24): 45-70. カマアシムシ科 Eosentomidae Imadate, G. & O. Nakamura, 1989. Contribution towards a revision アサヒカマアシムシ Eosentomon asahi Imadate of the Proturan Fauna of Japan (IV) New collecting records 山 北 町 高 松 山 （Imadate, 1974） ; 清 川 村 宮 ヶ 瀬 （Imadate, from the eastern part of Honshu.