DOCSLIB.ORG

Approved CWN Contacts

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Approved CWN Contacts Victorian State Aircraft Unit Call When Needed Operators - Fixed Wing 2007-2008 Register Company Contact Phone Fax Registration Make / Model Call sign Base Location AEROVISION DARYL CHIBNALL 03 5341 2470 03 5341 2469 VH-AEV CESSNA SKYMASTER 337G BIRDDOG 367 BALLARAT VH-TSX CESSNA SKYLANE 182RG FIRESPOTTER 395 BALLARAT VH-ZEV CESSNA SKYMASTER 337G BIRDDOG 373 BALLARAT AG AIRWORK ROB BOSCHEN 03 5881 8828 03 5881 8839 VH-IOK CESSNA C337G BIRDDOG 391 STAWELL VH-LGY ROCKWELL S2R-G6 THRUSH BOMBER 366 STAWELL VH-MQM BEECHCRAFT B58 BARON STAWELL VH-NFN AYRES S2R-G10 THRUSH BOMBER 367 STAWELL VH-NFU AYRES S2R-G10 THRUSH BOMBER 364 STAWELL VH-WTW BEECHCRAFT BONANZA A36 STAWELL AIR CENTRE ERIK MOL 02 6021 2929 02 6041 1297 VH-AWN PIPER NAVAJO ALBURY VH-AYC BEECHCRAFT B200 ALBURY VH-KMW PIPER NAVAJO ALBURY VH-KNI PIPER SENECA II ALBURY AIR NOSTALGIA ROBERT FISHER 03 9379 4930 03 9379 4961 VH-TMQ BOEING/DOUGLAS DC3 ESSENDON AIR WARRNAMBOOL ANTHONY (TONY) 03 5565 9139 03 5565 9135 VH-WTD CESSNA 182P WARRNAMBOOL ALPINE AIRWORK MICKFRANC GRIBBLE 03 5159 9369 03 5159 9359 VH-OWK CESSNA 172XP II FIRESPOTTER 378 BENAMBRA AUSTRALASIAN JET PAUL SAWYER / 03 9379 6999 03 9379 5949 VH-HXN PIPER NAVAJO PA31 MOORABBIN ANDREW LAMB VH-ITL BEECHCRAFT BARON BE58 MOORABBIN VH-KFK BEECHCRAFT BARON BE58 ESSENDON VH-KFU PIPER CHIEFTAIN 350 MOORABBIN VH-KGQ EMBRAER BANDEIRANTE MOORABBIN VH-KIB PIPER CHIEFTAIN PA31-350 MOORABBIN VH-KIG PIPER CHIEFTAIN PA31-350 MOORABBIN VH-KIO PIPER CHIEFTAIN PA31-350 MOORABBIN VH-KIY PIPER CHIEFTAIN PA31-350 MOORABBIN VH-LHF PIPER CHIEFTAIN PA31-350 ESSENDON VH-LKB BEECHCRAFT SUPER KINGAIR B200 ESSENDON VH-MDW AERO COMMANDER ESSENDON VH-MYQ PIPER CHIEFTAIN PA31-350 ESSENDON VH-NSK BEECHCRAFT BARON B58 MOORABBIN VH-OWN BEECHCRAFT KINGAIR B-200 ESSENDON VH-RCI SWEARINGEN MERLIN SA227-TT III ESSENDON VH-RUH PIPER CHIEFTAIN 350 MOORABBIN VH-TTB BEECHCRAFT DUCHESS BE76 ESSENDON VH-TTH BEECHCRAFT BARON BE58 ESSENDON VH-TTK CESSNA TITAN C404 ESSENDON VH-TTM PIPER NAVAJO PA31 ESSENDON VH-ZME CESSNA C402C ESSENDON VH-ZMD CESSNA CITATION C500 ESSENDON VH-ZMG CESSNA C402 ESSENDON VH-ZMK PIPER CHIEFTAIN PA31-350 ESSENDON BAIRNSDALE AIR CHARTER BOB HUSSEY 03 5152 4617 03 5152 3381 VH-FFG PIPER SENECA PA34 BIRDDOG 379 BAIRNSDALE VH-GWW PIPER LANCE PA32R FIRESPOTTER 390 BAIRNSDALE VH-JNU CESSNA 172R CUTLAS FIRESPOTTER 389 BAIRNSDALE VH-RXG CESSNA 172 AVCON FIRESPOTTER 380 BAIRNSDALE BENDIGO AVIATION SERVICES CHRIS GOBEL 03 5443 1030 03 5443 1030 VH-CBP PIPER AZTEC BIRDDOG 370 BENDIGO VH-DPH CESSNA C182 FIRESPOTTER 385 BENDIGO VH-HSE CESSNA C337 BIRDDOG 369 BENDIGO VH-HSM CESSNA C172XP FIRESPOTTER 383 BENDIGO VH-LTU PIPER NAVAJO CHIEFTAIN BENDIGO CORPORATE AIR ANDREW WEBB 02 6249 7044 02 6257 3135 VH-TAZ CESSNA C441 CONQUEST II CANBERRA VH-TFB CESSNA C441 CONQUEST II CANBERRA VH-VEA CESSNA C404 TITAN CANBERRA VH-VEB BEECHCRAFT BARON 58 CANBERRA VH-VEC CESSNA C404 TITAN CANBERRA VH-VED CESSNA C441 CONQUEST II CANBERRA VH-VEG BEECHCRAFT BARON 58 CANBERRA VH-VEJ CESSNA C441 CONQUEST II CANBERRA VH-VEK FAIRCHILD METRO 23 CANBERRA VH-VEM CESSNA C441 CONQUEST II CANBERRA VH-VEU FAIRCHILD METRO 23 CANBERRA VH-VEW CESSNA C441 CONQUEST II CANBERRA VH-VEZ CESSNA C441 CONQUEST II CANBERRA DIRECT AIR CHARTER JEREMY FRASER 03 9379 6099 03 9379 2654 VH-ITH BEECHCRAFT B200 SUPER KINGAIR ESSENDON VH-JCH PIPER PA31-350 ESSENDON VH-JJR BEECHCRAFT B200 SUPER KINGAIR ESSENDON VH-JUP CESSNA 337G BIRDDOG 392 ESSENDON VH-JVF BEECHCRAFT DUCHESS ESSENDON VH-JZW CESSNA C310R ESSENDON VH-OPC PIPER PA31-350 ESSENDON / MOORABBIN VH-OWN BEECHCRAFT SUPER KINGAIR B-200 ESSENDON VH-PBI CESSNA C310R ESSENDON VH-PNU PARTENAVIA P68B BIRDDOG 371 ESSENDON VH-SBZ CESSNA 337 BIRDDOG 384 ESSENDON VH-SJD PIPER PA31 ESSENDON VH-TCB CESSNA C172M FIRESPOTTER 370 ESSENDON VH-TOT PIPER PA31-350 ESSENDON GEELONG AVIATION ADAM SARIC 03 5264 1273 03 5264 1006 VH-ILM PARTENAVIA PN68C BIRDDOG 377 MOORABBIN VH-JOE CESSNA C337 BIRDDOG 375 GEELONG VH-JOI CESSNA C310R GEELONG VH-NSK BEECHCRAFT BARON BEECH58 MOORABBIN VH-OMD BEECHCRAFT BARON E55 CERES VH-PNV PARTENAVIA PN68B BIRDDOG 386 GEELONG VH-PUZ PARTENAVIA P68-C BIRDDOG 364 MOORABBIN VH-RON PIPER CHEROKEE SIX PA32-300 GEELONG VH-UAJ BEECHCRAFT TRAVELAIR E-95 BIRDDOG 361 MOORABBIN GIPPSLAND FLIGHT CENTRE DAMIEN CAIRNS 03 5144 3266 03 5144 5255 VH-KUR CESSNA C210F WEST SALE HAZAIR STEPHEN DEATH 02 6021 1656 02 6041 2156 VH-KFI CESSNA U206G FIRESPOTTER 201 ALBURY HOLIDAY AIR ADVENTURES (D. WALPOLE) RON WALPOLE 03 5753 5305 03 57535301 VH-WKW CESSNA R172K FIRESPOTTER 362 ROSEWHITE INTERAIR NAOMICHI NISHIZAWA 03 9374 4676 03 9374 4848 VH-ITH BEECHCRAFT BE20 ESSENDON JET CITY MARK WOOLSEY 03 9330 1555 03 9330 3969 VH-KCN BEECHCRAFT BARON BEECH58 TULLAMARINE KIRKHOPE AVIATION TONY KIRKHOPE 03 9882 4236 03 9882 4236 VH-ZCR CESSNA 340(A) (PRESSURISED) MOORABBIN VH-ZUM PIPER CHIEFTAIN MOORABBIN VH-HXN PIPER NAVAJO PA31 MOORABBIN VH-KFU PIPER CHIEFTAIN 350 MOORABBIN VH-RUH PIPER CHIEFTAIN 350 MOORABBIN LILYDALE FLYING SCHOOL JONOTHAN MERRIDEW 03 9739 1211 03 9739 1019 VH-FCT BEECHCRAFT BONANZA A36 BIRDDOG 382 LILYDALE VH-FLM BEECHCRAFT TRAVEL AIR LILYDALE VH-IJM BEECHCRAFT TRAVEL AIR BE95 LILYDALE VH-OYM PIPER NAVAJO PA31-310 LILYDALE VH-PFR PARTENANIA P68B BIRDDOG 380 LILYDALE / COLDSTREAM VH-RNM BEECHCRAFT BONANZA A36 FIRESPOTTER 367 LILYDALE VH-ZOB CESSNA SKYHAWK C172 FIRESPOTTER 364 LILYDALE MALLACOOTA AIR SERVICES GORDON SYMONS 0408 580 806 VH-PLR CESSNA 172G MALLACOOTA MELTON AIR SERVICES EVAN REEVE 03 9746 1342 03 9746 1328 VH-IOE AERO COMMANDER 500A BIRDDOG 372 MELTON VH-TCV CESSNA C182 FIRESPOTTER 365 MELTON PEGASUS FLYING SCHOOL NATHAN MULLER 03 5823 2261 03 5823 2264 VH-MNT PIPER NAVAJO PA-31 SHEPPARTON VH-SGF PIPER PA-34 SHEPPARTON ROYAL VICTORIAN FLYING CLUB JOE FERLAZZO 03 9580 0088 03 9587 5085 VH-ILM PARTENAVIA P68C BIRDDOG 377 MOORABBIN VH-NCE PIPER SEMINOLE PA44 MOORABBIN VH-PFR PARTENAVIA P68B BIRDDOG380 MOORABBIN SHARP AVIATION BERNIE JOHNS 03 5574 8216 03 5574 8258 VH-AUT CESSNA C182P FIRESPOTTER 368 HAMILTON VH-CCL PIPER NAVAJO CHIEFTAIN PORTLAND VH-KPR CESSNA C172 FIRESPOTTER 373 HAMILTON VH-LCE PIPER NAVAJO CHIEFTAIN PORTLAND VH-PWQ PIPER SENECA HAMILTON VH-SEZ FAIRCHILD METRO 3 PORTLAND VH-UUN FAIRCHILD METRO 3 PORTLAND VH-WCO CESSNA C182 FIRESPOTTER 343 PORTLAND SHORTSTOP JET CHARTER MIKE FALLS 03 9379 9299 03 9379 3643 VH-OVB GATES LEARJET 35A ESSENDON VH-OVC MERLIN IIIB ESSENDON VH-OVM MCDONNELL DOUGLAS DC3 ESSENDON VH-PSM CESSNA CITATION II ESSENDON STAWELL AVIATION SERVICES GRAEME BOATMAN 03 5358 3822 03 5358 3980 VH-IRJ CESSNA C172 FIRESPOTTER 382 STAWELL VH-JDG CESSNA C172 FIRESPOTTER 386 STAWELL VH-LGU CESSNA C206 FIRESPOTTER 384 STAWELL VH-ULE CESSNA C172 FIRESPOTTER 391 STAWELL STEWART AVIATION GRAEME SADLER 03 9379 1019 03 9374 2369 VH-UJD DORNIER DO-228 ESSENDON (CAIRNS) VH-UJL AERO COMMANDER AC-50 ESSENDON VH-VJD DORNIER DO-228 ESSENDON VH-VJN DORNIER DO-228 ESSENDON/CAIRNS VH-YJO AERO COMMANDER AC-50 ESSENDON WETTENHALL AIR SERVICES NIGEL WETTENHALL 03 5881 2504 03 5881 3115 VH-FUA CESSNA C182Q FIRESPOTTER 235 DENILIQUIN VH-MAB PIPER TWIN COMANCHE DENILIQUIN VH-MAV ROCKWELL AERO COMMANDER SHRIKE DENILIQUIN VH-SSL SWEARINGEN MERLIN III DENILIQUIN WIMDOWN PTY LTD JEFF MOORE 03 5382 1004 03 5382 6600 VH-WSK CESSNA 210 FIRESPOTTER 363 HORSHAM.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Aviation Activity Forecasts BOWERS FIELD AIRPORT AIRPORT MASTER PLAN
    Chapter 3 – Aviation Activity Forecasts BOWERS FIELD AIRPORT AIRPORT MASTER PLAN Chapter 3 – Aviation Activity Forecasts The overall goal of aviation activity forecasting is to prepare forecasts that accurately reflect current conditions, relevant historic trends, and provide reasonable projections of future activity, which can be translated into specific airport facility needs anticipated during the next twenty years and beyond. Introduction This chapter provides updated forecasts of aviation activity for Kittitas County Airport – Bowers Field (ELN) for the twenty-year master plan horizon (2015-2035). The most recent FAA-approved aviation activity forecasts for Bowers Field were prepared in 2011 for the Airfield Needs Assessment project. Those forecasts evaluated changes in local conditions and activity that occurred since the previous master plan forecasts were prepared in 2000, and re-established base line conditions. The Needs Assessment forecasts provide the “accepted” airport-specific projections that are most relevant for comparison with the new master plan forecasts prepared for this chapter. The forecasts presented in this chapter are consistent with Bowers Field’s current and historic role as a community/regional general aviation airport. Bowers Field is the only airport in Kittitas County capable of accommodating a full range of general aviation activity, including business class turboprops and business jets. This level of capability expands the airport’s role to serve the entire county and the local Ellensburg community. The intent is to provide an updated set of aviation demand projections for Bowers Field that will permit airport management to make the decisions necessary to maintain a viable, efficient, and cost-effective facility that meets the area’s air transportation needs.
    [Show full text]
  • History of Aircraft Designation Systems
    UNITED STATES NAVAL AVIATION 1910–1995 451 APPENDIX 5 Aircraft Designations and Popular Names Background on the Evolution of Aircraft Designations Aircraft model designation history is very complex. by a number to indicate the individual plane of that In order to fully understand the designations, it is type-manufacturer. Under this system: important to know the factors that played a role in developing the different missions that aircraft have been “A” was used for Curtiss hydroaeroplanes “B” for Wright hydroaeroplanes called upon to perform. Technological changes affect- “C” for Curtiss flying boats ing aircraft capabilities have resulted in corresponding “D” for Burgess flying boats changes in the operational capabilities and techniques “E” for Curtiss amphibian flying boats employed by the aircraft. Prior to World War I, the Navy tried various schemes for designating aircraft. This system had been established in 1911 by Captain In the early period of naval aviation a system was Washington I. Chambers, Director of Naval Aviation. developed to designate an aircraft’s mission. Different The following is a list of the types of aircraft and their aircraft class designations evolved for the various types designations in existence from 1911–1914: of missions performed by naval aircraft. This became known as the Aircraft Class Designation System. Aircraft Designation System 1911–1914 Numerous changes have been made to this system since the inception of naval aviation in 1911. A-1 Curtiss hydroaeroplane (originally an amphib- While reading this section various references will be ian, and the Navy’s first airplane) made to the Aircraft Class Designation System, A-2 Curtiss landplane (rebuilt as a hydroaeroplane) Designation of Aircraft, Model Designation of Naval A-3 Curtiss hydroaeroplane Aircraft, Aircraft Designation System, and Model A-4 Curtiss hydroaeroplane Designation of Military Aircraft.
    [Show full text]
  • Nov 12 Mag(E)
    Air Yorkshire Aviation Society Vol 38 Issue 11 November 2012 AP-BDZ Airbus A.310 of Pakistan International Touching down on Runway 32 at LBIA Paul Whincup www.airyorkshire.org.uk SOCIETY CONTACTS HONORARY LIFE PRESIDENT Mike WILLINGALE AIR YORKSHIRE COMMITTEE 2012 CHAIRMAN David SENIOR 23 Queens Drive, Carlton, WF3 3RQ tel: 0113 2821818 e-mail:[email protected] SECRETARY Jim STANFIELD 8 Westbrook Close, Leeds LS18 5RQ tel: 0113 258 9968 e-mail:[email protected] TREASURER David VALENTINE 8 St Margaret’s Avenue Assistant Treasurer Pauline VALENTINE Horsforth, Leeds LS18 5RY tel: 0113 228 8143 MEETINGS CO-ORDINATOR Alan SINFIELD tel: 01274 619679 e-mail: [email protected] MAGAZINE EDITOR Trevor SMITH 97 Holt Farm Rise, Leeds LS16 7SB tel: 0113 267 8441 e-mail: [email protected] VISITS ORGANISER Mike STOREY tel:0113 2526913 e-mail: [email protected] DINNER ORGANISER John DALE tel:01943 875 315 SECURITY Reynell PRESTON, Denis STENNING, Brian WRAY RECEPTION/REGISTRATION Paul WINDSOR VENUE LIAISON Geoff WARD Code of Conduct: a member should not commit any act which would bring the Society into disrepute in any way. Disclaimer: the views expressed in articles in the magazine are not necessarily those of the editor and the committee Copyright:- The photographs and articles in this magazine may not be reproduced in any form without the strict permission of the editor. SOCIETY ANNOUNCEMENTS MURGATROYDS Our next trip to our local chippie has been arranged for Friday December 7th. Anyone wishing to join us for some excellent fish and chips and a convivial chat, please contact Trevor Smith to book their place.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 3 – Projections of Aviation Demand
    Chapter 3 – Projections of Aviation Demand Chapter 3 Projections of Aviation Demand This chapter contains aviation activity forecasts for the University Park Airport (Airport) over a 20-year planning horizon. Aviation demand forecasts are an important step in the master planning process. Ultimately, they form the basis for future demand-driven improvements at the Airport, provide data from which to estimate future off-airport impacts, such as noise and traffic, and are incorporated by reference into other studies and policy decisions. This chapter, which presents aviation activity forecasts through 2030, is organized as follows: 3.1 Forecasting Approach 3.2 Enplaned Passengers 3.3 Based Aircraft 3.4 Based Aircraft Fleet Mix 3.5 Total Operations 3.6 Commercial Aircraft Operations 3.7 General Aviation Operations 3.8 Military Operations 3.9 Instrument Operations 3.10 Cargo Activity 3.11 Peak Operations 3.12 Design Aircraft 3.13 Forecast Summary and FAA TAF Comparison 3.14 Revised Enplanement Forecast The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) projects future aviation activity through its Terminal Area Forecasts (TAF) which were used to compare projections prepared for this master plan. Forecasts that are developed for airport master plans and/or federal grants must be approved by the FAA. It is the FAA’s policy, listed in Advisory Circular (AC) 150/5070-6B, Airport Master Plans, that FAA approval of forecasts should be consistent with the TAF. Master plan forecasts for operations, based aircraft and enplanements are considered to be consistent with the TAF if they meet the following criteria: • Forecasts differ by less than ten percent in the five-year forecast and 15 percent in the ten- or 20- year period If the forecast is not consistent with the TAF, differences must be resolved prior to using the forecast in FAA decision-making.
    [Show full text]
  • 033 BADA 2 5 Equivalences
    EUROPEAN ORGANISATION FOR THE SAFETY OF AIR NAVIGATION EUROCONTROL EUROCONTROL EXPERIMENTAL CENTRE EQUIVALENCES REPORT FOR THE BASE OF AIRCRAFT DATA (BADA) REVISION 2.5 EEC Note No. 30/96 EEC Task D09 EATCHIP Task SPT Issued: December 1996 The information contained in this document is the property of the EUROCONTROL Agency and no part should be reproduced in any form without the Agency’s permission. The views expressed herein do not necessarily reflect the official views or policy of the Agency. REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE Reference: Security Classification: EEC Note 30/96 Unclassified Originator: Originator (Corporate Author) Name/Location: EEC - APO EUROCONTROL Experimental Centre (Aircraft Performance and Operations) B.P.15 F - 91222 Brétigny-sur-Orge CEDEX FRANCE Telephone : +33 1 69 88 75 00 Sponsor: Sponsor (Contract Authority) Name/Location: EEC EUROCONTROL Agency Rue de la Fusée, 96 B -1130 BRUXELLES Telephone : +32 2 729 9011 TITLE: Equivalences Report for the Base of Aircraft Data (BADA) Revision 2.5 Author Date Pages Figures Tables Appendix References A.Bos 12/96 vi + 6 0 4 1 2 EATCHIP Task EEC Task No. Task No. Sponsor Period Specification SPT D09 2/96 to 12/96 Distribution Statement: (a) Controlled by: Head of APO (b) Special Limitations: None (c) Copy to NTIS: YES / NO Descriptors (keywords): aircraft model, total-energy model, BADA, equivalences Abstract: The Base of Aircraft Data (BADA) provides a set of ASCII files containing performance and operating procedure coefficients for 69 different aircraft types. These are the so-called directly supported models. Besides these 69 aircraft models there are an additional 96 models that are considered to be equivalent to one of these directly supported models.
    [Show full text]
  • Project Hegaasus
    PROJECT HEGAASUS Loughborough University, UK Virginia Tech, USA Powertrain Department Structures Department Aircraft Systems Department Aircraft Performance Department Business and Sales Department Modelling Department HYBRID ELECTRIC GENERAL AVIATION AIRCRAFT 2018 AIAA UNDERGRADUATE DESIGN COMPETITION Hybrid Electric General Aviation Aircraft Proposal HAMSTERWORKS DESIGN TEAM Sammi Rocker (USA) Daniel Guerrero (UK) Kyle Silva (USA) Design and Modelling Aircraft Integration Landing Gear & Certification AIAA – 543803 AIAA – 921916 AIAA –921097 Ashley Peyton-Bruhl (UK) Danny Fritsch (USA) Nathaniel Marsh (UK) Business & Sales Flight Physics Propulsion Design AIAA – 921913 AIAA-921435 AIAA-921919 Troy Bergin (USA) Jennifer Glover (UK) Alexander Mclean (USA) Structural Design Powertrain Design Stability & Performance AIAA – 736794 AIAA - 921554 AIAA - 921291 Dhirun Mistry (UK) Pradeep Raj, Ph.D. (USA) James Knowles, Ph.D. (UK) Avionic Systems Virginia Tech Advisor Loughborough University Advisor AIAA – 921917 i Hybrid Electric General Aviation Aircraft Proposal CONTENTS HAMSTERWORKS DESIGN TEAM ................................................................................................................ I LIST OF FIGURES .............................................................................................................................................V LIST OF TABLES ........................................................................................................................................... VII LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS
    [Show full text]
  • Aircraft Designations and Popular Names
    Chapter 1 Aircraft Designations and Popular Names Background on the Evolution of Aircraft Designations Aircraft model designation history is very complex. To fully understand the designations, it is important to know the factors that played a role in developing the different missions that aircraft have been called upon to perform. Technological changes affecting aircraft capabilities have resulted in corresponding changes in the operational capabilities and techniques employed by the aircraft. Prior to WWI, the Navy tried various schemes for designating aircraft. In the early period of naval aviation a system was developed to designate an aircraft’s mission. Different aircraft class designations evolved for the various types of missions performed by naval aircraft. This became known as the Aircraft Class Designation System. Numerous changes have been made to this system since the inception of naval aviation in 1911. While reading this section, various references will be made to the Aircraft Class Designation System, Designation of Aircraft, Model Designation of Naval Aircraft, Aircraft Designation System, and Model Designation of Military Aircraft. All of these references refer to the same system involved in designating aircraft classes. This system is then used to develop the specific designations assigned to each type of aircraft operated by the Navy. The F3F-4, TBF-1, AD-3, PBY-5A, A-4, A-6E, and F/A-18C are all examples of specific types of naval aircraft designations, which were developed from the Aircraft Class Designation System. Aircraft Class Designation System Early Period of Naval Aviation up to 1920 The uncertainties during the early period of naval aviation were reflected by the problems encountered in settling on a functional system for designating naval aircraft.
    [Show full text]
  • HNTB Corporation 2900 S Quincy St Telephone (703) 824-5100 Engineers Architects Planners Suite 600 Facsimile (703) 671-6210 Arlington, VA 22206
    HNTB Corporation 2900 S Quincy St Telephone (703) 824-5100 Engineers Architects Planners Suite 600 Facsimile (703) 671-6210 Arlington, VA 22206 www.hntb.com Theresa L. Samosiuk, P.E., C.M. Senior Project Manager Planning, Design and Construction Wayne County Airport Authority Detroit Metropolitan Wayne County Airport 11050 Rogell Drive, Bldg #602 Detroit, MI 48242 01/16/2018 Noise Modeling Technical Memorandum for the Runway 3L-21R Reconstruction at Detroit Metropolitan Wayne County Airport HNTB was tasked to assist the Wayne County Airport Authority (WCAA) in preparing technical analyses to support the development of a Documented Categorical Exclusion (CatEx) by Synergy Consultants, Inc. This technical memo evaluates the potential temporary noise impacts related to the reconstruction of Runway 3L-21R at Detroit Metropolitan Wayne County Airport (DTW). The runway reconstruction is scheduled to take place during the 2019 construction season. The Future Scenario representing construction year activity was based on projected 2020 activity levels to take advantage of forecast analyses previously prepared for the Master Plan Update (MPU). As such, it is conservative since it slightly overestimates the noise and air quality impacts. This technical report documents the development of the Existing Condition (2017) and Future Scenario (2020) noise contours included in the CatEx submission. 1 Fleet Mix Forecast Fleet mixes, including aircraft types, number and hour of operations, and flight distance, are one of the major components of modeling noise in the vicinity of an airport. This section describes the available forecasts, data sources, assumptions, and methodologies applied in the fleet mix development. 1.1 Available Forecasts There are several national and local forecasts available for DTW.
    [Show full text]
  • Rock Hill - York County Airport Airport Layout Plan
    ROCK HILL - YORK COUNTY AIRPORT AIRPORT LAYOUT PLAN TALBERT, BRIGHT & ELLINGTON June 2016 ROCK HILL − YORK COUNTY AIRPORT AIRPORT LAYOUT PLAN Prepared for: Rock Hill – York County Airport Commission, Federal Aviation Administration, and South Carolina Aeronautics Commission Prepared by TALBERT, BRIGHT & ELLINGTON, INC. June 2016 ROCK HILL – YORK COUNTY AIRPORT AIRPORT LAYOUT PLAN SECTIONS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................ I E.1 Forecast Summary ................................................................................................................................ I E.2 Facility Requirements Summary ........................................................................................................ II E.3 Airport Develoment Program ........................................................................................................... II INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Goals and Objectives ........................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Purpose of the Rock Hill – York County Airport ALP Update ................................................... 1 1.2.1 Key Issues ..................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2.2 Airport Layout Plans ..................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Business & Commercial Aviation
    JUNE/JULY 2020 $10.00 AviationWeek.com/BCA Business & Commercial Aviation 2020 PURCHASE PLANNING HANDBOOK Production Aircraft Comparison A Look at the Trends and New AND Performance Tables Developments in Avionics ALSO IN THIS ISSUE Bombardier Global 7500 Smoke Signals Under Pressure Mountain Wave Monsters One Too Many Digital Edition Copyright Notice The content contained in this digital edition (“Digital Material”), as well as its selection and arrangement, is owned by Informa. and its affiliated companies, licensors, and suppliers, and is protected by their respective copyright, trademark and other proprietary rights. Upon payment of the subscription price, if applicable, you are hereby authorized to view, download, copy, and print Digital Material solely for your own personal, non-commercial use, provided that by doing any of the foregoing, you acknowledge that (i) you do not and will not acquire any ownership rights of any kind in the Digital Material or any portion thereof, (ii) you must preserve all copyright and other proprietary notices included in any downloaded Digital Material, and (iii) you must comply in all respects with the use restrictions set forth below and in the Informa Privacy Policy and the Informa Terms of Use (the “Use Restrictions”), each of which is hereby incorporated by reference. Any use not in accordance with, and any failure to comply fully with, the Use Restrictions is expressly prohibited by law, and may result in severe civil and criminal penalties. Violators will be prosecuted to the maximum possible extent. You may not modify, publish, license, transmit (including by way of email, facsimile or other electronic means), transfer, sell, reproduce (including by copying or posting on any network computer), create derivative works from, display, store, or in any way exploit, broadcast, disseminate or distribute, in any format or media of any kind, any of the Digital Material, in whole or in part, without the express prior written consent of Informa.
    [Show full text]
  • 2014 ALP Chapter
    CHAPTER TWO Airport Facility Requirements ChapterChapter OneOne To properly plan for the future of Livermore DESIGN CRITERIA Municipal Airport, it is necessary to translate forecast aviation demand into the speciic types The FAA publishes Advisory Circular (AC) and quantities of facilities that can adequately 150/5300-13A, Airport Design, to guide serve the identiied demand. This chapter uses airport planning. The AC provides guidance the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on various design elements of an airport approved forecasts, as well as established intended to maintain or improve safety at air- planning criteria, to determine the airside (i.e., ports. The design standards include airport runways, taxiways, navigational aids, marking elements such as runways, taxiways, safety and lighting) and landside (i.e., hangars, aircraft areas, and separation distances. According parking apron, and automobile parking) to the AC, "airport planning should consider facility requirements. both the present and potential aviation needs and demand associated with the airport." The objective of this effort is to identify, in Consideration should be given to planning general terms, the adequacy of the existing runway and taxiway locations that will meet airport facilities and outline what new future separation requirements even if the facilities may be needed, and when these may width, strength, and length must increase be needed to accommodate forecast demands. later. Such decisions should be supported by A recommended airport layout concept will the aviation demand forecasts, coordinated be presented that consolidates all facility with the FAA, and shown on the Airport requirements into a single development Layout Plan (ALP). concept for the airport.
    [Show full text]
  • SERVICE BULLETIN Beech TITLE: FLIGHT CONTROLS - FLAP FLEX SHAFT (CABLE) ASSEMBLY INSPECTION/ REPLACEMENT
    MANDATORY SERVICE BULLETIN Beech TITLE: FLIGHT CONTROLS - FLAP FLEX SHAFT (CABLE) ASSEMBLY INSPECTION/ REPLACEMENT 1. Planning Information A. Effectivity (1) Airplanes NOTE All airplanes that have complied with Safety Communique No. 182 must still comply with this Service Bulletin because the suspect lot of affected cables has been expanded. (a) Civil Beech Model A36 Bonanza, Serials E-3302 through E-3398; Beech Model B36TC Bonanza, Serials EA-652 through EA-677; Beech Model 58 Baron, Serials TH-1936 through TH-1988 and TH-1990 through TH-1996. Those airplanes that have installed any P/N 12527Y-63.31 (left-hand), 12163Y-63.31 or 12163Y- 1 (right-hand) Flap Flex Shaft Assembly or any P/N 45-521212 (any dash number) Flap Actuator Assembly purchased from Raytheon Aircraft Company (RAPID) and shipped between March 1, 2000 and June 30, 2001 for any of the following Models: 35 (except for D-1 through D-837), A35, B35, C35, 35R, D35, E35, F35, G35, H35, J35, K35, M35, N35, P35, S35, V35, V35TC, V35A, V35A-TC, V35B, V35B-TC; 35-33, 35-A33, 35-B33, 35-C33, 35-C33A, E33, E33A, E33C, F33, F33A, F33C, G33; 36, A36, A36TC, B36TC; 95-55, 95-A55, 95-A55A, 95-B55, 95-B55A, 95- C55, 95-C55A, D55, D55A, E55, E55A; 95, B95, B95A, D95A, E95; 58, 58A, 58P, 58PA, 58TC, 58TCA; 56TC, A56TC; Airplanes conforming to Type Certificate No. 5A3, B45 (T-34A Export Version), B45 (T-34A variants Manufactured by Fuji Heavy Industries, Ltd.). (b) Military Those airplanes that have installed any P/N 12527Y-63.31 (left-hand), 12163Y-63.31 or 12163Y- 1 (right-hand) Flap Flex Shaft Assembly or any P/N 45-521212 (any dash number) Flap Actuator Assembly purchased from Raytheon Aircraft Company (RAPID) and shipped between March 1, Exported under the authority of license exception: TSU.
    [Show full text]