DOCSLIB.ORG

HNTB Corporation 2900 S Quincy St Telephone (703) 824-5100 Engineers Architects Planners Suite 600 Facsimile (703) 671-6210 Arlington, VA 22206

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
HNTB Corporation 2900 S Quincy St Telephone (703) 824-5100 Engineers Architects Planners Suite 600 Facsimile (703) 671-6210 Arlington, VA 22206 HNTB Corporation 2900 S Quincy St Telephone (703) 824-5100 Engineers Architects Planners Suite 600 Facsimile (703) 671-6210 Arlington, VA 22206 www.hntb.com Theresa L. Samosiuk, P.E., C.M. Senior Project Manager Planning, Design and Construction Wayne County Airport Authority Detroit Metropolitan Wayne County Airport 11050 Rogell Drive, Bldg #602 Detroit, MI 48242 01/16/2018 Noise Modeling Technical Memorandum for the Runway 3L-21R Reconstruction at Detroit Metropolitan Wayne County Airport HNTB was tasked to assist the Wayne County Airport Authority (WCAA) in preparing technical analyses to support the development of a Documented Categorical Exclusion (CatEx) by Synergy Consultants, Inc. This technical memo evaluates the potential temporary noise impacts related to the reconstruction of Runway 3L-21R at Detroit Metropolitan Wayne County Airport (DTW). The runway reconstruction is scheduled to take place during the 2019 construction season. The Future Scenario representing construction year activity was based on projected 2020 activity levels to take advantage of forecast analyses previously prepared for the Master Plan Update (MPU). As such, it is conservative since it slightly overestimates the noise and air quality impacts. This technical report documents the development of the Existing Condition (2017) and Future Scenario (2020) noise contours included in the CatEx submission. 1 Fleet Mix Forecast Fleet mixes, including aircraft types, number and hour of operations, and flight distance, are one of the major components of modeling noise in the vicinity of an airport. This section describes the available forecasts, data sources, assumptions, and methodologies applied in the fleet mix development. 1.1 Available Forecasts There are several national and local forecasts available for DTW. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) publishes the Terminal Area Forecast (TAF)i annually which includes enplanements and operations forecasts for DTW. Locally, the WCAA completed a Master Plan Updateii in July 2017 which includes forecasts of enplanements and operations. In addition, the FAA released a Draft Environmental Assessment (EA) for the Cleveland-Detroit Metroplex projectiii which included a fleet mix forecast component. The following sections discuss the results of the recent forecasts in more detail. 1.1.1 FAA Terminal Area Forecast (TAF) The FAA annually publishes the TAF which provides forecasts of enplanements and operations for airports included in the National Plan of Integrated Airport Systems (NPIAS). The TAF is used to meet the budget and planning needs of the FAA. The latest TAF (2016 TAF) was published in early 2017 and provides forecasts from fiscal years 2016 to 2045. The FAA applies a bottom-up approach for airports with more than 100,000 enplanements in the TAF, which includes DTW. Tables 1 and 2 show the 2016 TAF operations and enplanements forecasts for DTW. Table 1 2016 TAF Operations Forecast Fiscal Year Air Carrier Air Taxi General Aviation Military Total 2016 286,336 99,811 6,104 132 392,383 2017 298,185 93,552 6,191 132 398,060 2018 315,238 76,404 6,191 132 397,965 2019 332,663 57,094 6,191 132 396,080 2020 349,722 38,386 6,191 132 394,431 2021 365,784 21,205 6,191 132 393,312 2022 378,296 9,828 6,191 132 394,447 2023 385,775 7,067 6,191 132 399,165 2024 391,532 6,968 6,191 132 404,823 2025 397,328 7,018 6,191 132 410,669 2026 403,696 7,068 6,191 132 417,087 2027 410,079 7,119 6,191 132 423,521 2028 416,437 7,170 6,191 132 429,930 2029 422,981 7,221 6,191 132 436,525 2030 429,510 7,272 6,191 132 443,105 2031 435,979 7,324 6,191 132 449,626 2032 442,477 7,376 6,191 132 456,176 2033 449,014 7,429 6,191 132 462,766 2034 455,819 7,482 6,191 132 469,624 2035 462,939 7,536 6,191 132 476,798 2036 470,054 7,590 6,191 132 483,967 2037 476,997 7,645 6,191 132 490,965 2038 484,067 7,700 6,191 132 498,090 2039 491,217 7,756 6,191 132 505,296 2040 498,429 7,812 6,191 132 512,564 2041 505,480 7,868 6,191 132 519,671 2042 512,583 7,925 6,191 132 526,831 2043 519,881 7,982 6,191 132 534,186 2044 527,349 8,040 6,191 132 541,712 2045 534,896 8,099 6,191 132 549,318 CAGR1 2.2% -8.3% 0.0% 0.0% 1.2% 1 Compounded Annual Growth Rate (CAGR). Source: 2016 TAF Operations Forecast and HNTB Analysis 2017. 2 Table 2 2016 TAF Enplanements Forecast Domestic International International Fiscal Year Air Taxi Commuter Total Air Carrier US Flag Foreign Flag 2016 10,559,904 24 4,848,797 1,179,126 205,642 16,793,493 2017 10,711,282 24 4,994,440 1,238,783 187,120 17,131,649 2018 10,937,943 24 5,087,962 1,245,375 188,116 17,459,420 2019 11,136,420 24 5,170,684 1,252,274 189,158 17,748,560 2020 11,332,719 24 5,252,946 1,259,499 190,250 18,035,438 2021 11,525,705 24 5,333,045 1,267,046 191,390 18,317,210 2022 11,709,694 24 5,409,727 1,274,905 192,577 18,586,927 2023 11,887,848 24 5,484,525 1,283,073 193,811 18,849,281 2024 12,059,258 24 5,556,747 1,291,595 195,098 19,102,722 2025 12,235,043 24 5,630,632 1,300,437 196,434 19,362,570 2026 12,428,052 24 5,711,971 1,309,577 197,814 19,647,438 2027 12,621,445 24 5,792,992 1,319,002 199,238 19,932,701 2028 12,813,778 24 5,874,063 1,328,702 200,703 20,217,270 2029 13,011,577 24 5,957,697 1,338,720 202,217 20,510,235 2030 13,208,744 24 6,041,204 1,349,028 203,774 20,802,774 2031 13,404,298 24 6,123,770 1,359,622 205,374 21,093,088 2032 13,601,466 24 6,206,057 1,371,195 207,122 21,385,864 2033 13,799,539 24 6,289,094 1,383,096 208,920 21,680,673 2034 14,005,034 24 6,375,959 1,395,362 210,773 21,987,152 2035 14,219,494 24 6,466,857 1,409,478 212,906 22,308,759 2036 14,433,513 24 6,557,700 1,423,873 215,080 22,630,190 2037 14,641,669 24 6,646,551 1,438,576 217,301 22,944,121 2038 14,853,682 24 6,736,617 1,453,650 219,578 23,263,551 2039 15,068,320 24 6,827,419 1,468,961 221,891 23,586,615 2040 15,285,375 24 6,918,821 1,484,675 224,265 23,913,160 2041 15,497,681 24 7,007,805 1,501,420 226,794 24,233,724 2042 15,711,862 24 7,097,185 1,518,335 229,349 24,556,755 2043 15,932,294 24 7,188,924 1,535,522 231,945 24,888,709 2044 16,158,300 24 7,282,641 1,552,913 234,572 25,228,450 2045 16,387,002 24 7,377,393 1,570,448 237,221 25,572,088 CAGR1 1.5% 0.0% 1.5% 1.0% 0.5% 1.5% 1 Compounded Annual Growth Rate (CAGR). Sources: 2016 TAF Enplanement Forecast and HNTB Analysis 2017. 3 The 2016 TAF projects an overall growth rate of 1.2% in terms of operations (compounded annually). Operations by air carrier are projected to grow at the fastest pace of 2.2% annually. Operations by air taxi are projected to decline significantly through 2022 and stabilize thereafter. Operations by general aviation (GA) and military are projected to remain constant throughout the forecasting horizon. The 2016 TAF also projects an overall growth rate of 1.5% in enplanements (compounded annually). Domestic enplanements by air carrier and air taxi are expected to grow at a similar pace (1.5%) whereas international US flag and foreign flag enplanements are expected to grow at lower rates of 1.0% and 1.5%, respectively. Enplanements by air taxi are expected to stay constant. The faster pace of growth in enplanements than operations implies an increase in load factors, an up-gauge trend (i.e. larger aircraft), or both. 1.1.2 Master Plan Update The WCAA completed an MPU in July 2017 which included an aviation activity forecast. The base year of the aviation activity forecast was 2015 and the forecast years included 2020, 2025, 2030, and 2035. The MPU applied a multi-tiered approach to evaluate forecast passenger traffic, as shown in Figure 1. iv The operations forecasts were based on the passenger traffic forecasts and assumptions on average aircraft size, average cargo tonnage per operation, load factor, and FAA’s forecasts on GA trends. Table 3v depicts DTW historical and forecast aircraft operations and Table 4 vi depicts the DTW historical and forecast enplanements by terminal. Figure 1 MPU Forecast Approach 2. Identify key 4. Translate drivers of Detroit 3. Evaluate DTW 1. Select annual demand Primary Area unconstrained analytical tools forecasts into passenger and demand aircraft operations cargo demand Trend analysis O&D and Passenger load Regional connecting population and factor Regression passengers economic factors analysis Air freight Average seats per operation Industry and mail Cost of travel analysis Domestic and Cargo tons per international operation City-pair Global and sectors analysis national economic factors Airline service by Aircraft fleet mix city-pair Source: Figure 3-20 in MPU Final Report - Volume 1.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Chapter 2 – Aviation Demand Forecast
    CHAPTER 2 AVIATION FORECASTS Oscoda – Wurtsmith Airport Authority Oscoda-Wurtsmith Airport Master Plan CHAPTER 2 AVIATION FORECAST Aviation forecasts are time-based projections offering a reasonable expectation of future Oscoda- Wurtsmith Airport activity during the 20-year planning period (2010-2030). Forecasts influence virtually all phases of the planning process, as the relationship between activity and projected demand indicates the type, extent, and timing of Airport improvements for various triggers of Airport infrastructure, equipment and service needs. Primarily, the forecast of aircraft activity is used to quantify the Airport’s operational peaking and capacity characteristics, determine the sizing and space allocation for structures and site development, and form the basis to evaluate the feasibility of various development options. Overall, the forecast predictions attempt to account for factors at Oscoda which could likely influence projections in some significant or substantial way; whether an occurrence of past trends or an assumption of future expectations. As indicated in Chapter 1, the FAA Terminal Area Forecasts (TAF) combined with the forecasts developed for the Maintenance, Repair, and Overhaul (MRO) operations continues to support the Boeing 747 heavy widebody aircraft as the Airport’s most demanding, or critical aircraft, used for future facility planning and design purposes. The following forecast components are assessed in this chapter: Aircraft Operations – The number of aircraft landings and takeoffs conducted annually by local and itinerant traffic, including general aviation, commercial and military users. ‘Local’ operations are flights performed in the Airport traffic pattern vicinity, including proficiency training, instrument training and flights from nearby airports. ‘Itinerant’ operations are traffic arriving and departing from beyond the local vicinity.
    [Show full text]
  • Business & Commercial Aviation
    BUSINESS & COMMERCIAL AVIATION LEONARDO AW609 PERFORMANCE PLATEAUS OCEANIC APRIL 2020 $10.00 AviationWeek.com/BCA Business & Commercial Aviation AIRCRAFT UPDATE Leonardo AW609 Bringing tiltrotor technology to civil aviation FUEL PLANNING ALSO IN THIS ISSUE Part 91 Department Inspections Is It Airworthy? Oceanic Fuel Planning Who Says It’s Ready? APRIL 2020 VOL. 116 NO. 4 Performance Plateaus Digital Edition Copyright Notice The content contained in this digital edition (“Digital Material”), as well as its selection and arrangement, is owned by Informa. and its affiliated companies, licensors, and suppliers, and is protected by their respective copyright, trademark and other proprietary rights. Upon payment of the subscription price, if applicable, you are hereby authorized to view, download, copy, and print Digital Material solely for your own personal, non-commercial use, provided that by doing any of the foregoing, you acknowledge that (i) you do not and will not acquire any ownership rights of any kind in the Digital Material or any portion thereof, (ii) you must preserve all copyright and other proprietary notices included in any downloaded Digital Material, and (iii) you must comply in all respects with the use restrictions set forth below and in the Informa Privacy Policy and the Informa Terms of Use (the “Use Restrictions”), each of which is hereby incorporated by reference. Any use not in accordance with, and any failure to comply fully with, the Use Restrictions is expressly prohibited by law, and may result in severe civil and criminal penalties. Violators will be prosecuted to the maximum possible extent. You may not modify, publish, license, transmit (including by way of email, facsimile or other electronic means), transfer, sell, reproduce (including by copying or posting on any network computer), create derivative works from, display, store, or in any way exploit, broadcast, disseminate or distribute, in any format or media of any kind, any of the Digital Material, in whole or in part, without the express prior written consent of Informa.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Annual Noise Contour Report
    Minneapolis St. Paul International Airport (MSP) 2020 Annual Noise Contour Report Comparison of the 2020 Actual and the 2007 Forecast Noise Contours February 2021 MAC Community Relations Office and HNTB Corporation MSP 2020 Annual Noise Contour Report Metropolitan Airports Commission Table of Contents ES EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................. 1 ES.1 BACKGROUND ...................................................................................................................... 1 ES.2 AIRPORT NOISE LITIGATION AND CONSENT DECREE .............................................................. 1 ES.3 MSP 2020 IMPROVEMENTS EA/EAW ..................................................................................... 2 ES.4 THE AMENDED CONSENT DECREE ......................................................................................... 2 ES.5 2020 NOISE CONTOURS ......................................................................................................... 3 ES.6 AMENDED CONSENT DECREE PROGRAM ELIGIBILITY ............................................................. 3 ES.7 AMENDED CONSENT DECREE PROGRAM MITIGATION STATUS ............................................. 3 1. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND ................................................................................. 8 1.1 CORRECTIVE LAND USE EFFORTS TO ADDRESS AIRCRAFT NOISE ............................................ 8 1.2 2007 FORECAST CONTOUR .................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 79952 Federal Register / Vol
    79952 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 244 / Tuesday, December 21, 2010 / Rules and Regulations Unsafe Condition DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, (d) This AD was prompted by an accident Washington 98057–3356; telephone and the subsequent discovery of cracks in the Federal Aviation Administration (425) 227–1137; fax (425) 227–1149. main rotor blade (blade) spars. We are issuing SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 14 CFR Part 39 this AD to prevent blade failure and Discussion subsequent loss of control of the helicopter. [Docket No. FAA–2009–0864; Directorate We issued a supplemental notice of Compliance Identifier 2008–NM–202–AD; Amendment 39–16544; AD 2010–26–05] proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend (e) Before further flight, unless already 14 CFR part 39 to include an AD that done: RIN 2120–AA64 would apply to the specified products. (1) Revise the Limitations section of the That supplemental NPRM was Airworthiness Directives; DASSAULT Instructions for Continued Airworthiness by published in the Federal Register on AVIATION Model Falcon 10 Airplanes; establishing a life limit of 8,000 hours time- July 27, 2010 (75 FR 43878). That Model FAN JET FALCON, FAN JET in-service (TIS) for each blade set Remove supplemental NPRM proposed to FALCON SERIES C, D, E, F, and G each blade set with 8,000 or more hours TIS. correct an unsafe condition for the Airplanes; Model MYSTERE-FALCON (2) Replace each specified serial-numbered specified products. The MCAI states: 200 Airplanes; Model MYSTERE- blade set with an airworthy blade set in During maintenance on one aircraft, it was accordance with the following table: FALCON 20–C5, 20–D5, 20–E5, and 20– F5 Airplanes; Model FALCON 2000 and discovered that the overpressure capsules were broken on both pressurization valves.
    [Show full text]
  • Palm Beach International Airport (PBI)
    Agenda Item:~ PALM BEACH COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY -===================================================================== Meeting Date: January 12, 2021 [ ] Consent [ X] Regular [ ] Ordinance [ ] Public Hearing Submitted By: Department of Airports ---------------------------------------------------------------------- I. EXECUTIVE BRIEF Motion and Title: Staff recommends motion to approve: a Contract for Air Service Development Consulting Services (Contract) with Ailevon Pacific Aviation Consulting LLC (Ailevon), a Florida limited liability company, commencing on February 1, 2021, and expiring on January 31, 2024, with one 24-month option to renew for an amount not to exceed $200,000 per contract year for a total not to exceed amount of $600,000 for the initial term. Summary: This Contract provides for professional and technical consulting services on an as-needed basis in support of the air service development program for the Palm Beach International Airport (PBI). Ailevon's principal place of business is Atlanta, GA. Air service development consulting services may include, but are not limited to, air service strategy and planning, airline route study and forecasting, competitive service analysis, business case development for new/expanded air service, development of incentive programs, catchment area demographic and leakage studies and analysis of air traffic demand and airfare data. The Contract provides for a not to exceed amount of $200,000 per contract year with an initial three-year term and an option to renew for an additional 24 months at the County's sole option. Due to lack of availability of qualified Small/Minority/Women Owned Business Enterprises providing the services required by this Contract, the Office of Equal Business Opportunity issued a waiver of Affirmative Procurement Initiatives on July 30, 2020.
    [Show full text]
  • Metropolitan Airport Authority of Rock Island County, Illinois
    METROPOLITAN AIRPORT AUTHORITY OF ROCK ISLAND COUNTY, ILLINOIS QUAD CITY INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT P.O. BOX 9009 MOLINE, IL 61265-9009 309-764-9621 TEL 309-757-1515 FAX Airport Security and Safety Violations ______________________________________________________________________________ GENERAL The Transportation Security Administration and Federal Aviation Administration require that airports have a policy for non-compliance with Federal Regulations or Airport Policies and Procedures. The Airport’s Security and Driver training addresses violations and states that four or more types of security violations within 12 months may result in permanent revocation of an employee’s ID media. POLICIES AND PROCEDURES The following consequences will be enforced when Public Safety has determined that a violation of Federal Regulations and/or Airport Policy and Procedures has occurred. Ongoing records of violations are maintained in each employee’s Airport file. 12 months after the date of the first violation, the violation will be considered inactive and the process starts over. First Violation: The employee will be required to retrain within 10 days of notice. The ID Media will be confiscated by Public Safety if the retraining is not completed. Second Violation: The employee will be required to retrain within 10 days of notice and will be assessed a $50 fine. The ID Media will be confiscated by Public Safety if the retraining is not completed and/or the fine is not paid. Third Violation: The employee will be required to retrain within 10 days of notice and will be assessed a $100 fine. The ID Media will be confiscated by Public Safety if the retraining is not completed and/or the fine is not paid.
    [Show full text]
  • Airport Police Officer Duties & Responsibilities Document
    Career Opportunity Memphis-Shelby County Airport Authority Job Title: Airport Police Officer (Nonexempt) Department: Airport Police Deadline to Apply: Open Until Filled Annual Rate: $52,889.82 - $62,223.20 Job Number: 2021-06-17 PSAPO About the Job Under moderate supervision, maintains public order, prevents crimes, enforces laws and ordinances, protects life and property, and provides public safety within departmental policies and guidelines. Performs tasks mandated by federal government pertaining to civil aviation security regulations in a courteous and professional manner. An Airport Police Officer is an armed peace officer of the State of Tennessee and may work in uniform or plain clothes assignments. Responsibilities 1. Patrols designated area by foot, car, and other means to preserve law and order, discover and deter crimes. Enforces federal and state laws and regulations, local ordinances, Airport Security Program requirements, and airport rules and regulations. Provides written reports of all activity. 2. Responds to law enforcement calls for service, security breaches, violations of security regulations and trespasses. Takes appropriate law enforcement action as required or assigned. Assesses situation’s apparent facts before acting. Uses physical force and police trained methods when necessary. Maintains self- composure and acts with a high degree of integrity and independence while preforming duties. 3. Directs vehicular traffic, investigates vehicular accidents on Airport property and produces detailed written accident reports. 4. Provides general and aviation related information to the public, airport tenants and employees 5. Implements appropriate emergency procedures in the event of aircraft accidents, including crowd control, and safeguarding of lives and property. During off-duty hours, responds to an emergency upon request of proper authority.
    [Show full text]
  • Aviation Activity Forecasts BOWERS FIELD AIRPORT AIRPORT MASTER PLAN
    Chapter 3 – Aviation Activity Forecasts BOWERS FIELD AIRPORT AIRPORT MASTER PLAN Chapter 3 – Aviation Activity Forecasts The overall goal of aviation activity forecasting is to prepare forecasts that accurately reflect current conditions, relevant historic trends, and provide reasonable projections of future activity, which can be translated into specific airport facility needs anticipated during the next twenty years and beyond. Introduction This chapter provides updated forecasts of aviation activity for Kittitas County Airport – Bowers Field (ELN) for the twenty-year master plan horizon (2015-2035). The most recent FAA-approved aviation activity forecasts for Bowers Field were prepared in 2011 for the Airfield Needs Assessment project. Those forecasts evaluated changes in local conditions and activity that occurred since the previous master plan forecasts were prepared in 2000, and re-established base line conditions. The Needs Assessment forecasts provide the “accepted” airport-specific projections that are most relevant for comparison with the new master plan forecasts prepared for this chapter. The forecasts presented in this chapter are consistent with Bowers Field’s current and historic role as a community/regional general aviation airport. Bowers Field is the only airport in Kittitas County capable of accommodating a full range of general aviation activity, including business class turboprops and business jets. This level of capability expands the airport’s role to serve the entire county and the local Ellensburg community. The intent is to provide an updated set of aviation demand projections for Bowers Field that will permit airport management to make the decisions necessary to maintain a viable, efficient, and cost-effective facility that meets the area’s air transportation needs.
    [Show full text]
  • Employee Interline Travel Agreement
    Interline Staff Travel Agreement Personal and Duty Travel Version 15 Effective 1 June 2019 INTERLINE STAFF TRAVEL AGREEMENT (ISTA) TABLE OF CONTENTS PREAMBLE ..................................................................................................................................................... 1 SCOPE ............................................................................................................................................................ 1 DEFINITIONS .................................................................................................................................................. 1 A. ADMINISTRATION .......................................................................................................................................... 3 A.1. FULL MEMBERSHIP REQUIREMENTS ..................................................................................................... 3 A.2. ASSOCIATE MEMBERSHIP REQUIREMENTS .......................................................................................... 4 A.4. MEMBERSHIP CODE OF PRACTICE, RESPONSIBILITIES AND OBLIGATIONS ........................................... 5 A.5. SAF PROCEDURES .................................................................................................................................. 6 A.6. MEMBERSHIP LIMITATION, RESIGNATION, AND TERMINATION .......................................................... 7 A.7. MANAGEMENT .....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • DASSAULT AVIATION Model Falcon 10 Airplanes
    43878 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 143 / Tuesday, July 27, 2010 / Proposed Rules Applicability New Requirements of This AD: Actions Bulletin SBF100–27–092, dated April 27, (c) This AD applies to Fokker Services B.V. (h) Within 30 months after the effective 2009; and Goodrich Service Bulletin 23100– Model F.28 Mark 0100 airplanes, certificated date of this AD, do the actions specified in 27–29, dated November 14, 2008; for related in any category, all serial numbers. paragraphs (h)(1) and (h)(2) of this AD information. concurrently. Accomplishing the actions of Issued in Renton, Washington, on July 21, Subject both paragraphs (h)(1) and (h)(2) of this AD 2010. (d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of terminates the actions required by paragraph Jeffrey E. Duven, America Code 27: Flight Controls. (g) of this AD. (1) Remove the tie-wrap, P/N MS3367–2– Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Reason 9, from the lower bolts of the horizontal Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service. (e) The mandatory continuing stabilizer control unit, in accordance with the [FR Doc. 2010–18399 Filed 7–26–10; 8:45 am] airworthiness information (MCAI) states: Accomplishment Instructions of Fokker BILLING CODE 4910–13–P Two reports have been received where, Service Bulletin SBF100–27–092, dated April during inspection of the vertical stabilizer of 27, 2009. F28 Mark 0100 aeroplanes, one of the bolts (2) Remove the lower bolts, P/N 23233–1, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION that connect the horizontal stabilizer control of the horizontal stabilizer control unit and unit actuator with the dog-links was found install bolts, P/N 23233–3, in accordance Federal Aviation Administration broken (one on the nut side & one on the with the Accomplishment Instructions of Goodrich Service Bulletin 23100–27–29, head side).
    [Show full text]
  • Aircraft Tire Data
    Aircraft tire Engineering Data Introduction Michelin manufactures a wide variety of sizes and types of tires to the exacting standards of the aircraft industry. The information included in this Data Book has been put together as an engineering and technical reference to support the users of Michelin tires. The data is, to the best of our knowledge, accurate and complete at the time of publication. To be as useful a reference tool as possible, we have chosen to include data on as many industry tire sizes as possible. Particular sizes may not be currently available from Michelin. It is advised that all critical data be verified with your Michelin representative prior to making final tire selections. The data contained herein should be used in conjunction with the various standards ; T&RA1, ETRTO2, MIL-PRF- 50413, AIR 8505 - A4 or with the airframer specifications or military design drawings. For those instances where a contradiction exists between T&RA and ETRTO, the T&RA standard has been referenced. In some cases, a tire is used for both civil and military applications. In most cases they follow the same standard. Where they do not, data for both tires are listed and identified. The aircraft application information provided in the tables is based on the most current information supplied by airframe manufacturers and/or contained in published documents. It is intended for use as general reference only. Your requirements may vary depending on the actual configuration of your aircraft. Accordingly, inquiries regarding specific models of aircraft should be directed to the applicable airframe manufacturer.
    [Show full text]
  • ATP® Libraries Catalog
    2 ATP® Libraries Catalog Revision Date May 24 2016 ATP 101 South Hill Drive Brisbane, CA 94005 (+1) 415-330-9500 www.atp.com ATP® Policies and Legal www.atp.com/policy © Copyright 2016, ATP. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without prior written permission of ATP. The information in this catalog is subject to change without notice.ATP, ATP Knowledge, ATP Aviation Hub, HubConnect, NavigatorV, and their respective logos, are among the registered trademarks or trademarks of ATP. All third-party trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners and ATP asserts no ownership rights to these items. iPad and iPhone are trademarks of Apple Inc., registered in the U.S. and other countries. App Store is a service mark of Apple Inc. All original authorship of ATP is protected under U.S. and foreign copyrights and is subject to written license agreements between ATP and its subscribers. Visit www.atp.com/policy for more information ATP Customer Support Please visit www.atp.com/support for customer support information ATP® Libraries Catalog – Revision Date: May 24 2016 3 CONTENTS CONTENTS ...................................................................................................................................................................... 3 REGULATORY LIBRARIES .............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]