Seafood Group Project Final Report

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Seafood Group Project Final Report University of California, Santa Barbara Bren School of Environmental Science and Management From Sea to Table: Recommendations for Tracing Seafood 2010 Group Project Jamie Gibbon Connor Hastings Tucker Hirsch Kristen Hislop Eric Stevens Faculty Advisors: Hunter Lenihan John Melack Client: Monterey Bay Aquarium’s Sustainable Seafood Initiative From Sea to Table: Recommendations for Tracing Seafood From Sea to Table: Recommendations for Tracing Seafood As authors of this Group Project report, we are proud to archive this report on the Bren School’s website such that the results of our research are available for all to read. Our signatures on the document signify our joint responsibility to fulfill the archiving standards set by the Bren School of Environmental Science & Management. Jamie Gibbon Connor Hastings Tucker Hirsch Kristen Hislop Eric Stevens The mission of the Bren School of Environmental Science & Management is to produce professionals with unrivaled training in environmental science and management who will devote their unique skills to the diagnosis, assessment, mitigation, prevention, and remedy of the environmental problems of today and the future. A guiding principal of the School is that the analysis of environmental problems requires quantitative training in more than one discipline and an awareness of the physical, biological, social, political, and economic consequences that arise from scientific or technological decisions. The Group Project is required of all students in the Master’s of Environmental Science and Management (MESM) Program. It is a three-quarter activity in which small groups of students conduct focused, interdisciplinary research on the scientific, management, and policy dimensions of a specific environmental issue. This Final Group Project Report is authored by MESM students and has been reviewed and approved by: Hunter Lenihan John Melack March 2010 From Sea to Table: Recommendations for Tracing Seafood Abstract The seafood industry currently lacks a standardized, widespread tracing method to easily track seafood products as they move through the chain of custody. With global overfishing leading to declining fish stocks around the world, it is vital for seafood providers to be able to credibly identify products that come from well-managed sustainable fisheries that target abundant species and fish or farm in environmentally responsible ways. As part of their effort to promote the sale of sustainable seafood, Monterey Bay Aquarium has created partnerships with members of the seafood industry throughout the United States. These partnerships encourage members of the supply chain to identify the source and trace the movements of the seafood products they purchase. This project provides a set of recommendations for a verifiable tracing system that would meet the needs of a wide variety of these industry members. We developed a tiered approach that includes recommendations for immediate implementation, as well as future steps to be taken once the initial system is established. Online Reporting can initially be used alone and then later paired with Product Tagging and Third Party Verification to produce a tracing system that is effective, comprehensive, and verifiable, and will meet the needs of Monterey Bay Aquarium and its partners. ‐iii‐ From Sea to Table: Recommendations for Tracing Seafood Acknowledgements We would like to start our acknowledgements by thanking our advisors, Dr. Hunter Lenihan and Dr. John Melack, for their guidance and support throughout our project. We would also like to thank Dr. Chris Costello, Dr. Kim Selkoe, and Chris Voss for graciously giving us their time to provide us with invaluable advice. Additionally, we would like to thank Dr. Steven Gaines and Dr. Bruce Kendall for sitting on our defense panel and providing us with constructive feedbacks for improvements to our work. Thank you to Dr. Kim Selkoe, Dr. Chris Costello, and our client, the Monterey Bay Aquarium, for their efforts in proposing this project and providing the framework with which to commence our research. At the Monterey Bay Aquarium we would specifically like to thank Ed Cassano, Dr. Geoff Shester, and Erin Hudson. We would especially like to thank our contacts in the seafood industry, without which we would not have been able to complete this project. Special thanks to our contact at Santa Monica Seafood, Logan Kock, who provided many contacts. Additionally, thanks to Jim Gilmore from At-sea Processor Association, Lynette Walsh from Calkins & Burke, Lucas Barrowman and Michael Romine from Cleanfish, Melanie Merry from Naturally New Zealand and Solander Pacific, Jim Morrison from Northern Wind, Nick Sakagami from Trident Marketing, Inc., Andrew Furner from Trace Register, Tony Grey and David Arnett from Central Pacific Tuna, Helge Kittelsen and Gunsu Altindag from Trace Tracker, Allison Corcoran from Surefish, Dave Andersen from Aquarium of the Bay, Natalie Webster at American Tuna, and Anne Nistad and Susan Marks from Marine Stewardship Council. ‐iv‐ From Sea to Table: Recommendations for Tracing Seafood Table of Contents Abstract................................................................................................................................iii Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................iv Executive Summary............................................................................................................ 1 Project Significance ............................................................................................................ 5 Objectives ............................................................................................................................. 6 Methods................................................................................................................................. 7 Background .......................................................................................................................... 8 Literature Review ........................................................................................................................8 Case Studies........................................................................................................................27 Farmed Salmon ......................................................................................................................... 28 Wild Scallops.............................................................................................................................. 31 Yellowfin Tuna .......................................................................................................................... 34 Traceability Schemes .......................................................................................................41 Third Party Verification.......................................................................................................... 41 Online Reporting....................................................................................................................... 44 Product Tagging........................................................................................................................ 48 Costs.....................................................................................................................................50 Third Party Verification.......................................................................................................... 50 Product Tagging........................................................................................................................ 51 Online Reporting....................................................................................................................... 52 Industry Perceptions ........................................................................................................54 Analysis ....................................................................................................................................... 55 Matrix Results............................................................................................................................ 56 Important Findings................................................................................................................... 60 Recommendations.............................................................................................................61 Limitations for Tracing Implementation.....................................................................63 Future Research ................................................................................................................65 Conclusions.........................................................................................................................66 Figures.................................................................................................................................67 References...........................................................................................................................72 ‐v‐ From Sea to Table: Recommendations for Tracing Seafood Executive Summary The worldwide demand for seafood has led to industrialized fishing on a scale that has severely depleted fish stocks and has negatively impacted the health of marine ecosystems. As fishermen exploit fisheries and “fish down the food chain”, the trophic levels of fish landings are changing dramatically, leading to
Recommended publications
  • FOP Interreg EU Associate Member 2008 a Little Bit of History...The EII 20 Years of Seafood Certification
    FOP Interreg EU Associate Member 2008 A little bit of History...the EII 20 Years of Seafood Certification 1986 DOLPHIN-SAFE Monitoring of the Tuna Industry WW to verify that tuna is caught without harming marine mammals Achievements 98% decrease in dolphin mortality (2M dolphins saved) 95% of Worldwide Tuna Industry and Retailers participate 1991 MANGROVE ACTION PROJECT Promotion of Sustainable Shrimp Aquaculture Achievements 100 aquaculture plants converted to sustainability in Indonesia and Thailand 1994 TURTLE-SAFE Certification of SHRIMP fished with Trawler / Turtle Excluders Devices (TEDs) Achievements No more Turtle mortality in the American Mexican Gulf Shrimp Fleet (from approx. 15.000 per year). 2006 Certification of Products from Sustainable Fisheries and Aquaculture Fish, fresh Fish, preserves Fish, canned Fish, smoked Fish, frozen Sushi Seafood Eggs, caviar Fish Oils Fishmeal The only Industry-wide Certification Scheme The only scheme for both wild and farmed Scheme Wild- Farmed Fishfeed Market caught (Bio in Potential 2010) Friend of the Sea YES YES YES 100% Others wild-catch YES NO NO 50% Others bio-aqua NO YES NO 50% FISHERIES Artisanal Industrial AQUACULTURE Offshore Inland The Market Leader Certification Scheme Metric Tons of Positively Audited Origins Nr 1. Certification Scheme WW WILD-CAUGHT – APPROVED FISHERIES CATCH Peruvian Anchovies – 8.000.000 MT Menhaden – 640.000 MT Pacific Salmon – 300.000 MT European Pilchard – Sardine, Morocco – 760.000 MT Chub Mackerel – 100.000 MT Anchovy, Croatia - 100.000 MT Norway Shrimps – 40.000 MT Skipjack Tuna Pole and Line, Azores, Senegal, Phil. – 25.000 MT TOT APPROX: 10.000.000 MT (+10% of WW Catch) FARMED – APPROVED SITES PRODUCTION Mussels Galicia – 300.000 MT Stolt Seafarm Turbot – 4.000 MT Leroy Cod – 2.500 MT Sturgeon Agroittica – 500 MT Caviar Agroittica – 23 MT Others (Seabream, Sea bass, Trout, Salmon, Halibut, Kingfish) TOT APPROX: 500.000 MT Approved Artisanal Fisheries IRELAND VIETNAM AZORES SENEGAL BRASIL SRI LANKA MALDIVES INDONESIA The Market Leader Certification Scheme Nr of Cert.
    [Show full text]
  • Position Paper: Fish
    DSM’s position on fish oil December 2018 DSM is the world’s leading provider of Omega-3 fatty After qualification, we continue to maintain strong acids, a nutrient that’s good for the brain, eyes and heart. relationships with vendors on an ongoing basis to Some of our solutions are based on fish oil, others on promote sustainable fishing practices. algae. Both can be great sources of Omega-3 for people and animals. Why can’t DSM use alternatives to fish oil? At DSM, we are committed to using natural resources like We do. DSM is one of the leaders in research and fish oil responsibly and to developing alternatives. We development of products based on marine algae. recognize that global demand for fish is putting extreme We currently offer life’sDHA and life’sOMEGA dietary pressure on the world’s oceans. In fact, overfishing is the supplements which are vegetarian sources of Omega-3 main cause of biodiversity loss. made from algae grown in closed systems independent from the oceans. We have also developed and invested As such, all of our fish oil is certified by either Friend of in Veramaris, an algae-based Omega-3 solution for Sea or the Marine Stewardship Council, two organizations sustainable animal nutrition. Veramaris supports healthy that promote responsible and sustainable fisheries and Omega-3 levels in farm-raised salmon, a more sustainable aquaculture. In addition, we offer vegetarian sources of choice than wild caught fish. Omega-3 made from fully sustainable marine algae grown in closed systems that are independent from the oceans.
    [Show full text]
  • Where Does Your Seafood Come From?
    Where Does Your Seafood Come From? Author contact information Wynn W. Cudmore, Ph.D., Principal Investigator Northwest Center for Sustainable Resources Chemeketa Community College P.O. Box 14007 Salem, OR 97309 E-mail: [email protected] Phone: 503-399-6514 Published 2009 DUE # 0757239 1 NCSR curriculum modules are designed as comprehensive instructions for students and supporting materials for faculty. The student instructions are designed to facilitate adaptation in a variety of settings. In addition to the instructional materials for students, the modules contain separate supporting information in the "Notes to Instructors" section, and when appropriate, PowerPoint slides. The modules also contain other sections which contain additional supporting information such as assessment strategies and suggested resources. The PowerPoint slides associated with this module are the property of the Northwest Center for Sustainable Resources (NCSR). Those containing text may be reproduced and used for any educational purpose. Slides with images may be reproduced and used without prior approval of NCSR only for educational purposes associated with this module. Prior approval must be obtained from NCSR for any other use of these images. Permission requests should be made to [email protected]. Acknowledgements We thank David Lonsdale and Richard O’Hara of Chemeketa Community College for their thoughtful reviews. Their comments and suggestions greatly improved the quality of this module. We thank NCSR administrative assistant, Liz Traver,
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation and Legal Assessment of Certified Seafood
    Marine Policy ] (]]]]) ]]]–]]] Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect Marine Policy journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/marpol Evaluation and legal assessment of certified seafood Rainer Froese a,n, Alexander Proelss b a Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research (GEOMAR), Dusternbrooker¨ Weg 20, 24105 Kiel, Germany b Institute of Environmental and Technology Law, University of Trier, 54286 Trier, Germany article info abstract Article history: This study presents a legal review of international treaties to derive sound definitions of overfishing. It Received 27 January 2012 examines seafood stocks that were certified by the Marine Stewardship Council (MSC) or Friend of the Received in revised form Sea (FOS). Stock size and fishing pressure were compared with the internationally agreed reference 30 March 2012 points which both organizations have accepted. No suitable status information was found for 11% Accepted 31 March 2012 (MSC) to 53% (FOS) of the certified stocks. For the stocks with available status information, 19% (FOS) to 31% (MSC) had overfished stock sizes and were subject to ongoing overfishing. An analysis of legal Keywords: implications of certification of overfished stocks suggests that a certifying body cannot be held liable for Seafood certification a violation of internationally agreed standards unless the domestic law of its home country so Eco-labels regulates. States may ban the import of fish products from overfished stocks, but only in very specific Sustainable fishing cases. Possible causes for the certification of overfished stocks are discussed and recommendations are Maximum sustainable yield Law of the sea given on how the certifiers could improve their performance. The study concludes that it is still Code of conduct for sustainable fishing reasonable to buy certified seafood, because the percentage of moderately exploited, healthy stocks is 3–4 times higher in certified than in non-certified seafood.
    [Show full text]
  • Chasing Responsible Sourcing: the Case of UK Retailers and Sustainable Seafood
    Master thesis in Sustainable Development 317 Examensarbete i Hållbar utveckling Chasing Responsible Sourcing: The case of UK retailers and sustainable seafood Serena Chironna DEPARTMENT OF EARTH SCIENCES INSTITUTIONEN FÖR GEOVETENSKAPER Master thesis in Sustainable Development 317 Examensarbete i Hållbar utveckling Chasing Responsible Sourcing: The case of UK retailers and sustainable seafood Serena Chironna Supervisor: Gloria Gallardo Evaluator: Roger Herbert Copyright © Serena Chironna and the Department of Earth Sciences, Uppsala University Published at Department of Earth Sciences, Uppsala University (www.geo.uu.se), Uppsala, 2016 Content 1. Introduction .................................................................................................................................................................. 1 1.2 Seafood industry: an urgent need for sustainable practices ...................................................................................... 1 1.2.1 Fish supply chain: structure, main issues and sustainability challenges ........................................................... 2 1.3 Sourcing responsibly through eco-labelling: The MSC certification ....................................................................... 5 1.3.1 MSC: limitations and critiques .......................................................................................................................... 6 1.4 Objectives ................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Do You Know the Fish You're Eating?
    Do You Know the Fish You’re Eating? “Third fisherman: …Master, I marvel how the fishes live in the sea. First fisherman: Why, as men do a-land; the great ones eat up the little ones.” — Shakespeare OVERVIEW Students design and conduct research to discover firsthand what type of fish is being sold in their community, where this fish comes from, and whether that fish is an overfished species. This lesson gives students a chance to do their own market research and discover first-hand what type of fish is being sold to the public. It also provides an introduction to fish as an important food source and as an industry controlled partly by supply and demand. The results that emerge from this lesson will likely lead your students to question the role of public education in seafood choices for sustainable fisheries. OBJECTIVES Design a research project. Conduct market research regarding the types and sources of fish sold in the local community. GRADE LEVEL 8-12 SUBJECTS Language Arts Science Social Studies VOCABULARY capacity, commodity, depletion, fishery, overfishing, populations, stocks, sustainability MATERIALS Handout #1: List of overfished and near-overfished fish species Handout #2: Overview of world’s ocean fisheries Handout #3: Sample graphs and charts NATIONAL SCIENCE STANDARDS: This activity supports the following National Academy of Sciences science education standards. Grades 5-8: Unifying Concepts and Processes—Evidence, models, and explanation Standard A: Science as Inquiry—Abilities necessary to do scientific inquiry Standard
    [Show full text]
  • Private Standards and Certification in Fisheries and Aquaculture and Their Implications for Fish Trade from Developing Countries
    Cover-II.pdf 1 21/12/2010 11:18:35 C M Y CM MY CY CMY K Cover photographs: Background: The moon over Pigeon Point Lighthouse, San Francisco, USA; courtesy of Tyler Westcott/Creative Commons Insert: An image of a bio-certified fish; courtesy of Deutsche See. FAO FISHERIES AND Private standards and AQUACULTURE TECHNICAL certification in fisheries PAPER and aquaculture 553 Current practice and emerging issues by Sally Washington FAO Consultant Christchurch, New Zealand and Lahsen Ababouch Chief Products, Trade and Marketing Service FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Department Rome, Italy FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS Rome, 2011 The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) concerning the legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers, whether or not these have been patented, does not imply that these have been endorsed or recommended by FAO in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. The views expressed in this information product are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of FAO. ISBN 978-92-5-106730-7 All rights reserved. FAO encourages reproduction and dissemination of material in this information product. Non-commercial uses will be authorized free of charge, upon request. Reproduction for resale or other commercial purposes, including educational purposes, may incur fees.
    [Show full text]
  • Seafood Watch
    AND Argentine Shortfin Squid Illex argentinus Argentina Jig October 2, 2017 The Safina Center Seafood Analysts Disclaimer Seafood Watch and The Safina Center strive to ensure that all our Seafood Reports and recommendations contained therein are accurate and reflect the most up-to-date evidence available at the time of publication. All our reports are peer-reviewed for accuracy and completeness by external scientists with expertise in ecology, fisheries science or aquaculture. Scientific review, however, does not constitute an endorsement of the Seafood Watch program or of The Safina Center or their recommendations on the part of the reviewing scientists. Seafood Watch and The Safina Center are solely responsible for the conclusions reached in this report. We always welcome additional or updated data that can be used for the next revision. About The Safina Center The Safina Center (formerly Blue Ocean Institute) translates scientific information into language people can understand and serves as a unique voice of hope, guidance, and encouragement. The Safina Center (TSC) works through science, art, and literature to inspire solutions and a deeper connection with nature, especially the sea. Our mission is to inspire more people to actively engage as well-informed and highly motivated constituents for conservation. Led by conservation pioneer and MacArthur fellow, Dr. Carl Safina, we show how nature, community, the economy and prospects for peace are all intertwined. Through Safina’s books, essays, public speaking, PBS television series, our Fellows program and Sustainable Seafood program, we seek to inspire people to make better choices. The Safina Center was founded in 2003 by Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Initial Audit Report
    Friend of the Sea Standard FOS - Wild –Non-Freezer Vessels Sustainable fishing Requirements REV DATE REASON VALIDATION APPROVAL 0 18/01/2013 First issue OK OK 1 01/07/2015 Content update OK OK 2 27/12/2015 Update Document Title OK OK Friend of the Sea www.friendofthesea.org Table of contents Introduction ............................................................................................... 3 1 STOCK STATUS ..................................................................................................... 12 2 ECOSYSTEM IMPACT........................................................................................... 14 3 SELECTIVITY ............................................................................................................. 15 4 LEGAL CONFORMITY ............................................................................................... 16 5 MANAGEMENT ........................................................................................................... 18 6 WASTE MANAGEMENT ............................................................................................ 19 7 ENERGY MANAGEMENT .......................................................................................... 20 8 SOCIAL ACCOUNTABILITY ............................................................................... 20 CONCLUSIONS:............................................................................................................. 21 2 Introduction Friend of the Sea is a non-governmental organisation established in 2008, whose
    [Show full text]
  • THE MARKETPLACE for SUSTAINABLE SEAFOOD Growing Appetites and Shrinking Seas
    THE MARKETPLACE FOR SUSTAINABLE SEAFOOD Growing Appetites and Shrinking Seas JUNE 2003 Table of Contents Introduction 1 Overview of the U.S. Seafood Supply 3 Figure 1.1—Alaska Pollock Catch, U.S. vs. Foreign, 1985-1994 3 Figure 1.2—U.S. Commercial Fish Landings, by Volume, 1992-2001 4 Figure 1.3—U.S. Wild Fishery Landings 2000 vs. 2001 4 Figure 1.4—U.S. Seafood Trade, by Volume 1992-2001 5 Figure 1.5—U.S. Seafood Trade, by $ Value 1992-2001 6 Figure 1.6—Leading U.S. Seafood Exports 2000 vs. 2001 6 Figure 1.7—Leading U.S. Seafood Imports 2000 vs. 2001 7 Overview of U.S. Seafood Demand 8 Figure 2.1—U.S. Consumer Expenditures on Seafood, 1993-2001 8 Figure 2.2—U.S. Seafood Consumption Volume, 1992-2001 9 Figure 2.3—U.S. Seafood Consumption 1980-2001 9 Figure 2.4—The Most Consumed Seafood in the U.S. 10 Consumer Attitudes on Sustainability 11 Figure 3.1—Frequency of Seafood Consumption 11 Figure 3.2—Awareness of Seafood Health and Sustainability Issues 12 Figure 3.3—Awareness of Seafood Source, Wild Caught or Farmed 12 Figure 3.4—Factors in Seafood Purchasing 13 Figure 3.5—Seafood Information 15 Figure 3.6—Interest in Types of Seafood Information 15 Figure 3.7—Preferred Seafood Information Channels 16 Figure 3.8—Impact of “Environmentally-Responsible” Seafood Label 17 Figure 3.9—Solutions to Problems with Commercial Fishing 18 Figure 3.10—Likely Consumption of Fish and Seafood Upon Learning of Environmental Concerns 19 Chef, Restaurateur, and Retailer Attitudes on Sustainability 20 Figure 4.1—Awareness of Seafood Health and Sustainability Issues 20 Figure 4.2—Source of Fish and Seafood 21 Figure 4.3—Response to Seafood Environmental Concerns 22 Figure 4.4—Interest in Information About Sustainable Seafood 22 Figure 4.5—Willingness to Act 23 Conclusion 24 Appendices 25 Appendix 1—List of Markets Surveyed 26 Appendix 2—Survey of Consumers 27 Appendix 3—Survey of Chefs and Restaurateurs 34 Appendix 4—Survey of Retailers 37 Statement of Principles 40 Introduction For many Americans, the most salient connection they have to the ocean is the seafood they eat.
    [Show full text]
  • Sustainable Fish City Pledge
    Sustainable Fish City pledge THE SUSTAINABLE FISH CITY CAMPAIGN aims for London to become the first ever sustainable fish city, aiming to achieve significant progress in time for the arrival of the London 2012 Olympic and Paralympic Games. The campaign’s first winning step was to help the London 2012 Games organisers to adopt a sustainable fish policy. Now we want London’s shops, fish suppliers, restaurants, caterers, schools, colleges and tourist attractions to follow suit, supported by the buying power and encouragement of engaged citizens. By signing the Sustainable Fish City pledge, we are promising to take the appropriate steps to buy sustainable seafood, to protect precious marine environments and fish stocks, and good fishing livelihoods. Specifically we pledge to take the following steps: • Step 1 - State our commitment : Tell our customers and the public that we are developing and implementing a policy on seafood sustainability in our business. • Step 2 - Gather information : Assess and monitor the environmental sustainability of the seafood we serve. • Step 3 - Source sustainably : Make sustainable seafood choices. This will include: o Avoiding the worst : Telling our supplier(s) or caterer to remove endangered species from menus and catering – those rated as ‘fish to avoid’ by the Marine Conservation Society: www.fishonline.org/advice/avoid/ o Promoting the best : Serving sustainably managed fish – MSC-certified fish, and those rated as ‘fish to eat’ by the Marine Conservation Society: www.fishonline.org/advice/eat/ o Improving the rest : Telling our supplier(s) or caterer we want to serve only sustainable fish – and that there are organisations that can help them to do this, such as Good Catch: www.goodcatch.org.uk and the MSC: www.msc.org • Step 4 - Communicate clearly : Spread the message with our customers, supplier(s), caterer, employees and other key stakeholders about seafood sustainability.
    [Show full text]
  • History Letter from the President Accomplishments Seaweb Board
    History Letter from the President Accomplishments SeaWeb Board 1995 SeaWeb Staff The Pew Charitable Trusts recruits Vikki Spruill to create a new communications-based New Ventures ocean initiative called the Marine Conservation Initiative. The Initiative conducts the first public opinion poll in the U.S. on attitudes towards the Careers ocean and marine conservation and surveys the marine conservation community to help FAQs determine their views on what is needed to raise the profile of this sector. 1996 The Marine Conservation Initiative changes its name to SeaWeb and opens an office in Washington, D.C. SeaWeb writes and distributes the first edition of Ocean Update, a newsletter that today reaches thousands of policy makers, journalists and concerned citizens. Unique to the sector, it highlights breakthrough scientific work and major actions within the marine conservation community, and points readers directly to the source. 1997 SeaWeb creates and launches its first scientific spokes team, including Dr. Sylvia Earle, Dr. Jane Lubchenco, Dr. John Ogden and Dr. Carl Safina, who toured the country to meet with editorial boards as well as key science and environment reporters. SeaWeb releases the pivotal report Danger at Sea (.pdf), the first comprehensive review that combined public attitudes with the latest facts about the state of the ocean. SeaWeb launches The Ocean Report radio program, narrated by renowned ocean expert Sylvia Earle and Jaws author Peter Benchley, as the first regular series to air nationally on ocean conservation issues. SeaWeb founder Vikki Spruill is awarded the 1997 President's Award by the National Marine Educators Association (NMEA) during their annual meeting in Chicago.
    [Show full text]