Moments with Yakov Borisovich Zeldovich

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Moments with Yakov Borisovich Zeldovich Moments with Yakov Borisovich Zeldovich Remo Ruffini1 ICRANet, p.le della Repubblica, 10 - 65122 Pescara, Italy and ICRA and University of Rome “Sapienza”, p. Aldo Moro 5, I-00185, Rome, Italy and ICRANet, University of Nice-Sophia Antipolis, 28 avenue de Valrose, 06103 Nice Cedex 2, France Abstract. A recollection of special moments spent with Yakov Borisovich Zeldovich and with the scientists of Soviet Union and abroad. The first impression upon meeting a person is the one ing about these methods and commenting appropriately which characterizes all subsequent interactions. also about Sakharov’s recent opinions as presented in the I met Yakov Borisovich Zeldovich for the first time New York Times and asking ourselves about the fate of in 1968 at the GR5 meeting in Tbilisi. I had known Sakharov after his open statements. The plane was sup- his name from his two classic papers on relativistic posed to be a direct flight to Tbilisi of approximately astrophysics in Physics Uspekhi coauthored with Igor seven hours. After approximately three hours of flight, Novikov [1, 2]. There had been a strong impulse to boy- without any announcement, the plane abruptly started to cott the GR5 meeting due to the tense relations over hu- descend quite rapidly and landed in a town called Min- man rights between the Soviet Union and the USA at that eralnye Vody. After landing there was a lot of confu- time. Finally a small group around Johnny Wheeler de- sion, there were additional planes and finally it was dis- cided to participate. Among them were Arthur Komar, closed that, as a common practice in the Soviet Union Bruce Partridge, Abe Taub and myself. in the presence of bad weather, the plane had stopped It was also my first visit to the Soviet Union. The en- and we would continue the flight the morning after. It trance to Leningrad was already very special showing was also announced that for foreigners there would be a the difference in organization from our Western world. room to sleep. Soon after I realized that there was only I will recall elsewhere some of the anecdotes. It was in one room for all the foreigners! Since it was impossi- the airplane to Tbilisi that a very particular experience ble to sleep I went back to the airport hall and I noticed occurred. The year 1968 was a time in which dissent was this person who had been sitting between me and Ko- growing in the Soviet Union and the New York Times mar on the plane to be alone in the hall and had found had just written an article on Andrei Sakharov and his a chair. He was seating quietly waiting for the morning. reflections on peaceful coexistence and intellectual free- I was attracted by his silence and his self-control. I ap- dom. I boarded the plane for Tbilisi with Arthur Komar. proached him introducing myself: “Ruffini, Italy.” To this We sat in the last row of a quite modern jet plane with his answer: “Sakharov, Soviet Union!” I still remember open seats and shining windows, and we were comment- his serene smile. He was the first Soviet scientist I met on ing and laughing on all those stories we had heard in the way to our meeting in Tbilisi. The arrival in Tbilisi the West about windowless seats reserved for western- with Kumar and Sakharov was marked by the fortunate ers on Soviet planes. When the plane was almost full the encounter with other monumental scientific figures. stewardess called the names of Arthur Komar and Remo We had the marvelous opportunity to meet some his- Ruffini asked us to move to seats reserved for us in the torical figures like Vladimir Fock, Iosif Shklovsky and front of the plane. We were delighted and we considered Alexei Petrov and also Dmitry Ivanenko. It was amusing arXiv:0911.4825v1 [physics.hist-ph] 25 Nov 2009 this an honor. Our two seats were in a line of three seats to see the ceremonial relations between Fock and Iva- ::: the only ones in the plane without a window. We were nenko. Fock, who as expected was always in the first quite upset. In between us there was a third person who row, had a conspicuous auditorial “apparat." Every time did not seem to speak English. So we started complain- Ivanenko was taking the floor to speak, Fock was discon- necting his “apparat” with a very explicit gesture. In ad- dition of course there was Yakov Borisovich surrounded 1 to appear in the proceedings of the international conference “The by a large number of then young collaborators includ- Sun, the Stars, The Universe and General Relativity” in honor of ing Gennady Bisnovatyi-Kogan, Valery Chechetkin, Vik- th Ya. B. Zeldovich 95 Anniversary, held in Minsk, Belarus on April tor Shvartsman, Nikolay Shakura, Alexei Starobinsky, 20-23, 2009. Rashid Sunyaev, Sergei Shandarin and others. Zeldovich was encouraging all his students to attack in their scien- later reproposed by Viktor Shvartsman [6] by consider- tific presentations almost like a boxer ring trainer. ing the role of the many neutrino species and in general The first day of the meeting Zeldovich invited me to the number of “difficult to observe particles with zero to lunch and asked me just at the beginning to speak rest mass”. In that paper Viktor, see figure 2 established about my research. I started to explain my work on self- his classical result of an upper limit to the number of neu- gravitating bosons I had started in Rome and just recon- trino species Nn ≤ 3 assuming that the chemical potential sidered after an interaction with the Pascual Jordan group of the electron neutrino be zero. This result signed a new in Hamburg. Indeed it was there that we realized that beginning in the dark matter problem in the Universe. the previous treatment on Einstein-Klein-Gordon fields I myself worked later on the role of massive neutrinos had a fatal error in the energy-momentum tensor leading in cosmology. I considered their fundamental role both to meaningless results. Later the correct work was com- in cosmological nucleosynthesis [7] and in formation of pleted by myself at Princeton and the published paper the structure in the Universe due to dark matter, leading [3] became known as the paper in which the new con- to a fractal structure of the Universe [8]. cept of Boson Stars was introduced. After my first words But let us go back to Zeldovich: we became very good Yakov Borisovich stopped me. I asked why. He stated friends in the following years, and I regularly met him in “How long did you speak?” I answered “approximately Moscow. We had also the great pleasure to share so many forty seconds.” To that he replied “If Landau would have common friends. In particular, I remember many interac- been here he would have stopped you after twenty sec- tions with Bruno Pontecorvo, see figure 3. In particular, onds.” To that I immediately replied somewhat amused with the participation of Bruno and Italian television we and self-confident “I do not think so, I am sure Landau produced a documentary “Il caso neutrino” recovering would have said how new is this idea and he would have the fundamental moments of the discovery of the neu- approved my considerations.” He followed then my pre- trino all the way to the determination of their mass and sentation of the new results and more polite and construc- their role in cosmology [9]. tive discussions followed for the rest of the lunch. We Since 1973 I had the great fortune to become a very also talked about George Gamow. Zeldovich recalled the close friend of Evgeny Lifshitz. He had just granted to animosity of all Soviet physicists towards Gamow since me and John Wheeler the honor of being quoted in a he did not return to Moscow after the famous Solvay named exercise in the volume “Theory of Fields” of his meeting of 1933, see figure 1. By this action Gamow classic series with Landau. As we became more famil- hampered the possibility for all Soviet physicists to travel iar with Evgeny, I developed a profound admiration of abroad after that date. He recalled how he was motivated his intellectual abilities, of his understanding of physics by a matter of pure confrontation against Gamow for and of his moral stature. Evgeny often recalled a series of some time. As soon as Gamow presented the theory of anecdotes. One of the best aphorisms of Landau: “Astro- a hot universe he himself presented an alternative the- physicists often in error, never in doubt,” and a different ory of a cold universe, initially at zero temperature [4]. one related not only to astrophysicists but to physicists at The process of building up heavy elements was stopped large: “Due to the shortness of our lives we cannot afford in his theory by the presence of a degenerate sea neutri- the luxury to spend time on topics which are not promis- nos and only hydrogen would be born from an expand- ing successful new results”. It was Evgeny who made ing Friedman universe. He stressed again, how building me aware of some additional peculiarities in Zeldovich’s such a theory was motivated ideologically and politically. character. He recognized the crucial role of the Penzias and Wil- Lifshitz described that famous argument on the equa- son discovery of the cosmic microwave background ra- tion of state of neutron stars. Zeldovich first challenged diation which disproved his ‘political’ theory and proved the concept of the critical mass of the neutron star us- instead the validity of Gamow’s theory2.
Recommended publications
  • The Morphology of the X-Ray Afterglows and of the Jetted Gev Emission in Long Grbs
    MNRAS 000,1– ?? (2020) Preprint 17 March 2021 Compiled using MNRAS LATEX style file v3.0 The morphology of the X-ray afterglows and of the jetted GeV emission in long GRBs R. Ruffini,1;2;5;7;14 R. Moradi,1;2;15? J. A. Rueda,1;2;4;8;16 L. Li,1;2;15 N. Sahakyan,1;6 Y.-C. Chen,1;2 Y. Wang,1;2;15 Y. Aimuratov,1;2;9 L. Becerra,1;2;17 C. L. Bianco,1;2;16 C. Cherubini,1;3;11 S. Filippi,1;3;10 M. Karlica,1;2 G. J. Mathews,1;12 M. Muccino,13 G. B. Pisani,1;2 and S. S. Xue1;2 1 ICRANet, Piazza della Repubblica 10, I-65122 Pescara, Italy 2 ICRA, Dipartimento di Fisica, Università di Roma “La Sapienza”, Piazzale Aldo Moro 5, I-00185 Roma, Italy 3 ICRA, University Campus Bio-Medico of Rome, Via Alvaro del Portillo 21, I-00128 Rome, Italy 4 ICRANet-Ferrara, Dipartimento di Fisica e Scienze della Terra, Università degli Studi di Ferrara, Via Saragat 1, I–44122 Ferrara, Italy 5 ICRANet-Rio, Centro Brasileiro de Pesquisas Físicas, Rua Dr. Xavier Sigaud 150, 22290–180 Rio de Janeiro, Brazil 6 ICRANet-Armenia, Marshall Baghramian Avenue 24a, Yerevan 0019, Republic of Armenia 7 Université de Nice Sophia-Antipolis, Grand Château Parc Valrose, Nice, CEDEX 2, France 8 Dipartimento di Fisica e Scienze della Terra, Università degli Studi di Ferrara, Via Saragat 1, I–44122 Ferrara, Italy 9 Fesenkov Astrophysical Institute, Observatory 23, 050020 Almaty, Kazakhstan 10 Department of Engineering, University Campus Bio-Medico of Rome, Nonlinear Physics and Mathematical Modeling Lab, Via Alvaro del Portillo 21, 00128 Rome, Italy 11 Department of Science and Technology for Humans and the Environment and Nonlinear Physics and Mathematical Modeling Lab, University Campus Bio-Medico of Rome, Via Alvaro del Portillo 21, 00128 Rome, Italy 12 Center for Astrophysics, Department of Physics, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN, 46556, USA 13 Instituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati, I-00044 Frascati, Italy 14 INAF, Viale del Parco Mellini 84, 00136 Rome, Italy 15 INAF – Osservatorio Astronomico d’Abruzzo,Via M.
    [Show full text]
  • What Is Gravity Probe B? a Quest for Experimental Truth the GP-B Flight
    What is Gravity Probe B? than Gravity Probe B. It’s just a star, a telescope, and a spinning sphere.” However, it took the exceptional collaboration of Stanford, Gravity Probe B (GP-B) is a NASA physics mission to experimentally MSFC, Lockheed Martin and a host of others more than four decades investigate Einstein’s 1916 general theory of relativity—his theory of gravity. to develop the ultra-precise gyroscopes and the other cutting- GP-B uses four spherical gyroscopes and a telescope, housed in a satellite edge technologies necessary to carry out this “simple” experiment. orbiting 642 km (400 mi) above the Earth, to measure, with unprecedented accuracy, two extraordinary effects predicted by the general theory of rela- The GP-B Flight Mission & Data Analysis tivity: 1) the geodetic effect—the amount by which the Earth warps the local spacetime in which it resides; and 2) the frame-dragging effect—the amount On April 20, 2004 at 9:57:24 AM PDT, a crowd of over 2,000 current and by which the rotating Earth drags its local spacetime around with it. GP-B former GP-B team members and supporters watched and cheered as the tests these two effects by precisely measuring the precession (displacement) GP-B spacecraft lifted off from Vandenberg Air Force Base. That emotionally angles of the spin axes of the four gyros over the course of a year and com- overwhelming day, culminating with the extraordinary live video of paring these experimental results with predictions from Einstein’s theory. the spacecraft separating from the second stage booster meant, as GP-B Program Manager Gaylord Green put it, “that 10,000 things went right.” A Quest for Experimental Truth Once in orbit, the spacecraft first underwent a four-month Initialization The idea of testing general relativity with orbiting gyroscopes was sug- and Orbit Checkout (IOC), in which all systems and instruments were gested independently by two physicists, George Pugh and Leonard Schiff, initialized, tested, and optimized for the data collection to follow.
    [Show full text]
  • Cosmic Background Explorer (COBE) and Beyond
    From the Big Bang to the Nobel Prize: Cosmic Background Explorer (COBE) and Beyond Goddard Space Flight Center Lecture John Mather Nov. 21, 2006 Astronomical Search For Origins First Galaxies Big Bang Life Galaxies Evolve Planets Stars Looking Back in Time Measuring Distance This technique enables measurement of enormous distances Astronomer's Toolbox #2: Doppler Shift - Light Atoms emit light at discrete wavelengths that can be seen with a spectroscope This “line spectrum” identifies the atom and its velocity Galaxies attract each other, so the expansion should be slowing down -- Right?? To tell, we need to compare the velocity we measure on nearby galaxies to ones at very high redshift. In other words, we need to extend Hubble’s velocity vs distance plot to much greater distances. Nobel Prize Press Release The Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences has decided to award the Nobel Prize in Physics for 2006 jointly to John C. Mather, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, USA, and George F. Smoot, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA "for their discovery of the blackbody form and anisotropy of the cosmic microwave background radiation". The Power of Thought Georges Lemaitre & Albert Einstein George Gamow Robert Herman & Ralph Alpher Rashid Sunyaev Jim Peebles Power of Hardware - CMB Spectrum Paul Richards Mike Werner David Woody Frank Low Herb Gush Rai Weiss Brief COBE History • 1965, CMB announced - Penzias & Wilson; Dicke, Peebles, Roll, & Wilkinson • 1974, NASA AO for Explorers: ~ 150 proposals, including: – JPL anisotropy proposal (Gulkis, Janssen…) – Berkeley anisotropy proposal (Alvarez, Smoot…) – Goddard/MIT/Princeton COBE proposal (Hauser, Mather, Muehlner, Silverberg, Thaddeus, Weiss, Wilkinson) COBE History (2) • 1976, Mission Definition Science Team selected by HQ (Nancy Boggess, Program Scientist); PI’s chosen • ~ 1979, decision to build COBE in-house at GSFC • 1982, approval to construct for flight • 1986, Challenger explosion, start COBE redesign for Delta launch • 1989, Nov.
    [Show full text]
  • Tests of General Relativity - Wikipedia
    12/2/2018 Tests of general relativity - Wikipedia Tests of general relativity T ests of general relativity serve to establish observational evidence for the theory of general relativity. The first three tests, proposed by Einstein in 1915, concerned the "anomalous" precession of the perihelion of Mercury, the bending of light in gravitational fields, and the gravitational redshift. The precession of Mercury was already known; experiments showing light bending in line with the predictions of general relativity was found in 1919, with increasing precision measurements done in subsequent tests, and astrophysical measurement of the gravitational redshift was claimed to be measured in 1925, although measurements sensitive enough to actually confirm the theory were not done until 1954. A program of more accurate tests starting in 1959 tested the various predictions of general relativity with a further degree of accuracy in the weak gravitational field limit, severely limiting possible deviations from the theory. In the 197 0s, additional tests began to be made, starting with Irwin Shapiro's measurement of the relativistic time delay in radar signal travel time near the sun. Beginning in 197 4, Hulse, Taylor and others have studied the behaviour of binary pulsars experiencing much stronger gravitational fields than those found in the Solar System. Both in the weak field limit (as in the Solar System) and with the stronger fields present in systems of binary pulsars the predictions of general relativity have been extremely well tested locally. In February 2016, the Advanced LIGO team announced that they had directly detected gravitational waves from a black hole merger.[1] This discovery, along with additional detections announced in June 2016 and June 2017 ,[2] tested general relativity in the very strong field limit, observing to date no deviations from theory.
    [Show full text]
  • Vatican Observatory N E W S L E T T
    vatican observatory NEWSLETTER Spring 2012 embracing, encouraging and promoting scientific study VOF Honors Benefactors at Circles of Giving Awards Dinner DID YOU KNOW? German Jesuit Christoph Cla- vius’s viewing of the total solar eclipse of 1560 made him de- cide that astronomy would be his life's work? He went on to write numerous textbooks and Rich Friedrich and Peter Moore was the senior mathematician on Fr. DiUlio and Marianne Augustine of the Pacific Western Foundation the commission for the reform of On February 24, 2012, the Vatican Observatory Foundation honored friends and benefactors who have so the calendar in 1582. The Vatican generously supported the work of the Vatican Observatory over time. Each year as donors reach a certain Observatory Foundation rec- lifetime giving level, they achieve a Circle of Giving designation and are recognized and thanked publicly ognizes his contribution to the by the President and Board of Directors as well as their fellow benefactors and friends. Each Circle of Giv- field by welcoming benefactors of ing is named in honor of one of the exceptional individuals connected with astronomy, the Society of Jesus $10,000 to the Christoph Clavius and the Vatican Observatory. At this year’s dinner four honorees were present to receive awards from Circle of Giving. Foundation President Fr. Albert J. DiUlio, S.J., and Board Chairman, Richard J. Friedrich. They included Christoph Clavius Bill Ahmanson of The Ahmanson Foundation; Marianne Augustine; Peter Moore of the Pacific Western Foundation; and Dan Cracchiolo of The Steele Foundation, whose award was accepted by his sister, Rose Collins.
    [Show full text]
  • Icranet Activities with Brazil
    ICRANet activities with Brazil ICRANet-IRAP PhD Fellowships to Brazilian Students pp. 1-17 Part 1 CAPES-ICRANet Program I cycle – 2013-2016 Part 2 p. 19 2. a – IRAP Ph. D. Program pp. 21-27 2. b – Postdoctoral Program in Europe/Asia pp. 29-42 2. c – Postdoctoral Program in Brazil pp. 43-54 2. d – Senior Visitors in Brazil pp. 55-66 2. e – Senior Visitors in Europe/Asia pp. 67-78 0 1. ICRANet-IRAP PhD Fellowships to Brazilian Students index - de Barros, Gustavo 3 - Pereira, Jonas Pedro 7 - Sversut Arsioli, Bruno 11 - Gomes de Oliveira, Fernanda 15 - Maiolino, Tais 17 1 2 de Barros, Gustavo Position: IRAP PhD – Fifth Cycle, 2006-09 Current position: Professor Adjunto Centro Universitário da Zona Oeste – OEZO Publications: -) Patricelli, B.; Bernardini, M. G.; Bianco, C. L.; Caito, L.; de Barros, G.; Izzo, L.; Ruffini, R.; Vereshchagin, G. V.; “Analysis of GRB 080319B and GRB 050904 within the Fireshell Model: Evidence for a Broader Spectral Energy Distribution”; The Astrophysical Journal, 756 (2012), id. 16; DOI: 10.1088/0004- 637X/756/1/16 -) Bianco, C. L.; Amati, L.; Bernardini, M. G.; Caito, L.; De Barros, G.; Izzo, L.; Patricelli, B.; Ruffini, R.; “The class of ``disguised'' short GRBs and its implications for the Amati relation”; Memorie della Società Astronomica Italiana Supplement, 21 (2012), 139. -) Patricelli, B.; Bernardini, M. G.; Bianco, C. L.; Caito, L.; de Barros, G.; Izzo, L.; Ruffini, R.; Vereshchagin, G.; “High Energetic Gamma Ray Bursts and Their Spectral Properties Within the Fireshell Model”; International Journal of Modern Physics: Conference Series, 12 (2012), pp.
    [Show full text]
  • The Russian-A(Merican) Bomb: the Role of Espionage in the Soviet Atomic Bomb Project
    J. Undergrad. Sci. 3: 103-108 (Summer 1996) History of Science The Russian-A(merican) Bomb: The Role of Espionage in the Soviet Atomic Bomb Project MICHAEL I. SCHWARTZ physicists and project coordinators ought to be analyzed so as to achieve an understanding of the project itself, and given the circumstances and problems of the project, just how Introduction successful those scientists could have been. Third and fi- nally, the role that espionage played will be analyzed, in- There was no “Russian” atomic bomb. There only vestigating the various pieces of information handed over was an American one, masterfully discovered by by Soviet spies and its overall usefulness and contribution Soviet spies.”1 to the bomb project. This claim echoes a new theme in Russia regarding Soviet Nuclear Physics—Pre-World War II the Soviet atomic bomb project that has arisen since the democratic revolution of the 1990s. The release of the KGB As aforementioned, Paul Josephson believes that by (Commissariat for State Security) documents regarding the the eve of the Nazi invasion of the Soviet Union, Soviet sci- role that espionage played in the Soviet atomic bomb project entists had the technical capability to embark upon an atom- has raised new questions about one of the most remark- ics weapons program. He cites the significant contributions able and rapid scientific developments in history. Despite made by Soviet physicists to the growing international study both the advanced state of Soviet nuclear physics in the of the nucleus, including the 1932 splitting of the lithium atom years leading up to World War II and reported scientific by proton bombardment,7 Igor Kurchatov’s 1935 discovery achievements of the actual Soviet atomic bomb project, of the isomerism of artificially radioactive atoms, and the strong evidence will be provided that suggests that the So- fact that L.
    [Show full text]
  • The Specola Vaticana: Astronomy at the Vatican
    Organizations, People and Strategies in Astronomy 2 (OPSA 2), 217-230 Ed. A. Heck, © 2013 Venngeist. THE SPECOLA VATICANA: ASTRONOMY AT THE VATICAN GUY CONSOLMAGNO AND CHRISTOPHER CORBALLY Specola Vaticana V-00120, Vatican City State [email protected] [email protected] Abstract. The Vatican is an independent nation, with its own national astronomical observatory, the Specola Vaticana (Vatican Observatory). As- tronomy has been supported at the Vatican since the 1582 reform of the calendar; the present-day Observatory has been in operation since 1891. The work of the observatory is divided between two sites, one in the pa- pal summer gardens south of Rome, Italy, and the other affiliated with the Steward Observatory at the University of Arizona, in Tucson, Arizona, USA. Research undertaken by current staff members ranges from cosmol- ogy and the study of galactic evolution to meteoritics and meteors. Given the stable funding provided by the Vatican, the Observatory has specialized in long-term mapping and cataloguing projects that would be difficult to mount under a traditional three-year funding cycle. These have included participation in the Carte du Ciel photographic map of the sky; the at- lases of spectra produced by its Spectrochemical Laboratory; surveys of star clusters and peculiar stars; and the cataloguing of meteorite physical properties. 1. Astronomy in the Holy See Before 1891 To the Christian church, the study of creation has long been supported as an act of worshipping the Creator. Astronomy was one of the seven subjects that made up the curriculum of the medieval universities, which were themselves founded by the Church.
    [Show full text]
  • Aleksei A. Abrikosov 1928–2017
    Aleksei A. Abrikosov 1928–2017 A Biographical Memoir by M. R. Norman ©2018 National Academy of Sciences. Any opinions expressed in this memoir are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Academy of Sciences. ALEKSEI ALEKSEEVICH ABRIKOSOV June 25, 1928–March 29, 2017 Elected to the NAS, 2000 Shortly after the 2003 announcement that Aleksei Abrikosov had won the Nobel Prize in Physics, a number of colleagues took Alex to lunch at a nearby Italian restau- rant. During lunch, one of the Russian visitors exclaimed that Alex should get a second Nobel Prize, this time in Literature for his famous “AGD” book with Lev Gor’kov and Igor Dzyaloshinskii (Methods of Quantum Field Theory in Statistical Physics.) Somewhat taken aback, I looked closely at this individual and realized that he was deadly serious. Although I could imagine the reaction of the Nobel Literature committee to such a book (for a lay person, perhaps analogous to trying to read Finnegan’s Wake), I had to admit that my own copy of this book is quite dog-eared, having been put to good use over the By M. R. Norman years. In fact, you know you have made it in physics when your book gets a Dover edition. One of the most charming pictures I ever saw was a rare drawing in color that Alexei Tsvelik did (commissioned by Andrei Varlamov for Alex’s 50th birthday) that was proudly displayed in Alex’s home in Lemont, IL. It showed Alex with his fingers raised in a curled fashion as in the habit of medieval Popes.
    [Show full text]
  • Global Program
    PROGRAM Monday morning, July 13th La Sapienza Roma - Aula Magna 09:00 - 10:00 Inaugural Session Chairperson: Paolo de Bernardis Welcoming addresses Remo Ruffini (ICRANet), Yvonne Choquet-Bruhat (French Académie des Sciences), Jose’ Funes (Vatican City), Ricardo Neiva Tavares (Ambassador of Brazil), Sargis Ghazaryan (Ambassador of Armenia), Francis Everitt (Stanford University) and Chris Fryer (University of Arizona) Marcel Grossmann Awards Yakov Sinai, Martin Rees, Sachiko Tsuruta, Ken’Ichi Nomoto, ESA (acceptance speech by Johann-Dietrich Woerner, ESA Director General) Lectiones Magistrales Yakov Sinai (Princeton University) 10:00 - 10:35 Deterministic chaos Martin Rees (University of Cambridge) 10:35 - 11:10 How our understanding of cosmology and black holes has been revolutionised since the 1960s 11:10 - 11:35 Group Picture - Coffee Break Gerard 't Hooft (University of Utrecht) 11:35 - 12:10 Local Conformal Symmetry in Black Holes, Standard Model, and Quantum Gravity Plenary Session: Mathematics and GR Katarzyna Rejzner (University of York) 12:10 - 12:40 Effective quantum gravity observables and locally covariant QFT Zvi Bern (UCLA Physics & Astronomy) 12:40 - 13:10 Ultraviolet surprises in quantum gravity 14:30 - 18:00 Parallel Session 18:45 - 20:00 Stephen Hawking (teleconference) (University of Cambridge) Public Lecture Fire in the Equations Monday afternoon, July 13th Code Classroom Title Chairperson AC2 ChN1 MHD processes near compact objects Sergej Moiseenko FF Extended Theories of Gravity and Quantum Salvatore Capozziello, Gabriele AT1 A Cabibbo Cosmology Gionti AT3 A FF3 Wormholes, Energy Conditions and Time Machines Francisco Lobo Localized selfgravitating field systems in the AT4 FF6 Dmitry Galtsov, Michael Volkov Einstein and alternatives theories of gravity BH1:Binary Black Holes as Sources of Pablo Laguna, Anatoly M.
    [Show full text]
  • Lev Davidovich Landau Born: 12 January, 1908, Baku, Russian Empire Died: 1 April, 1968, Moscow, Soviet Union
    Symmetry XIII (2019) 1 Dedicated to Lev Davidovich Landau Born: 12 January, 1908, Baku, Russian Empire Died: 1 April, 1968, Moscow, Soviet Union Symmetry XIII (2019) 2 Volume XIII, 2019 Editorial Symmetry This issue of symmetry is dedicated to the great physicists Lev Devidovich Landau. An annual Publication of CDP, TU Landau Soviet theoretical physicist, one of the founders of quantum theory of (Covid-19 Issue) condensed matter whose pioneering research in this field was recognized with the Patron 1962 Nobel Prize for Physics. In the year 1941, he successfully applied quantum Prof. Dr. Binil Aryal theory to the movement of superfluid liquid helium. Landau argued for the need of yet another radical conceptual revolution in physics in order to resolve the Advisory Board mounting difficulties in relativistic quantum theory. The collective work of Prof. Dr. Om Prakash Niraula Landau’s group embraced practically every branch of theoretical physics. In 1946 Prof. Dr. Raju Khanal he described the phenomenon of Landau damping of electromagnetic waves in Prof. Dr. Narayan Prasad Adhikari plasma. Together with Vitaly L. Ginzburg, in 1950 Landau obtained the correct Prof. Dr. Ram Prasad Regmi equations of the macroscopic theory of superconductivity. During the 1950s he and Prof. Dr. Ishwar Koirala collaborators discovered that even in renormalized quantum electrodynamics, a Dr. Hari Prasad Lamichhane new divergence difficulty appears (the Landau pole). The phenomenon of the Dr. Bal Ram Ghimire coupling constant becoming infinite or vanishing at some energy is an important Dr. Ajay Kumar Jha feature of modern quantum field theories. In this volume, there are 7 articles Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolution Debate George V
    Guest Editorial The Evolution Debate George V. Coyne, S.J. Vatican Observatory ow did we humans come to be in the expanding, which result in H evolving universe known through astrophysics stepwise changes and cosmology? It is quite clear that we do not know in the products everything about this process. But it would be scientifi- carried out by cally untenable to deny that the human brain is a result natural selection of a natural process of the development of ever more in the environ- complex chemistry in an evolving universe that is 13.7 ment in which billion years old and contains about 100 billion galaxies, the products each of which contains on the average about 200 billion come to exist. stars of an immense variety. After the universe became Those products rich in certain basic chemicals through the death of stars survive that can of various masses, those chemicals got together in suc- best adapt to cessive steps to make ever more complex molecules. their environ- Finally, in some extraordinary series of chemical process- ment. There is, es, the human brain came to be the most complicated therefore, an George V. Coyne machine that we know. apparent destiny Did this happen by chance or by necessity? The first toward more perfect beings, i.e., beings better able to thing to be said is that the problem is not formulated adapt in this process; but the apparent destiny can be correctly. It is not just a question of chance or necessity explained by the natural process itself. This apparent because, first of all, it is both.
    [Show full text]