Central Carolinas Biodiversity Trail Logo
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Basic Elements of Ground-Water Hydrology with Reference to Conditions in North Carolina by Ralph C Heath
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Basic Elements of Ground-Water Hydrology With Reference to Conditions in North Carolina By Ralph C Heath U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Open-File Report 80-44 Prepared in cooperation with the North Carolina Department of Natural^ Resources and Community Development Raleigh, North Carolina 1980 United States Department of the Interior CECIL D. ANDRUS, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY H. W. Menard, Director For Additional Information Write to: Copies of this report may be purchased from: GEOLOGICAL SURVEY U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Open-File Services Section Post Office Box 2857 Branch of Distribution Box 25425, Federal Center Raleigh, North Carolina 27602 Denver, Colorado 80225 Preface Ground water is one of North Carolina's This report was prepared as an aid to most valuable natural resources. It is the developing a better understanding of the primary source-of water supplies in rural areas ground-water resources of the State. It and is also widely used by industries and consists of 46 essays grouped into five parts. municipalities, especially in the Coastal Plain. The topics covered by these essays range from However, its use is not increasing in proportion the most basic aspects of ground-water to the growth of the State's population and hydrology to the identification and correction economy. Instead, the present emphasis in of problems that affect the operation of supply water-supply development is on large regional wells. The essays were designed both for self systems based on reservoirs on large streams. study and for use in workshops on ground- The value of ground water as a resource not water hydrology and on the development and only depends on its widespread occurrence operation of ground-water supplies. -
How to Enjoy Your North Carolina State Parks
NORTH CAROLINA STATE PARKS — YOUR STATE PARKS The State Parks described in this booklet portunities for economical vacations—either are the result of planning and development in the modern, fully equipped vacation cabins over a number of years. or in the campgrounds. Endowed by nature with ideal sites that We sincerely believe that North Carolina's range from the shores of the Atlantic Ocean well planned, well located, well equipped and to the tops of the Blue Ridge Mountains, the well maintained State Parks are a matter of State has located its State Parks for easy ac- justifiable pride in which every citizen has a cess as well as for varied appeal. They offer a share. This is earned by your cooperation in choice of homelike convenience and comfort observing the lenient rules and leaving the orderly. in sturdy, modern facilities . the hardy facilities and grounds clean and outdoor life of tenting and camp cooking . Keep this guide book for handy reference or the quick-and-easy freedom of a day's pic- use your State Parks year 'round for healthful nicking. The State Parks offer excellent op- recreation and relaxation! CONTENTS Page General Information 3-7 Information Chart 18-19 Map-Location of State Parks 18-19 Cliffs of the Neuse 8-9 Fort Macon 10-11 Hammocks Beach 12-13 Hanging Rock 14-15 Jones Lake 16-17 Morrow Mountain 20-21 Mount Jefferson 22-23 Mount Mitchell 24-25 Pettigrew 26-27 Reedy Creek 28-29 Singletary Lake 30-31 William B. Umstead 32-33 2 ADMINISTRATION GENERAL INFORMATION The North Carolina State Parks are developed, operated, maintained and administered hy the De- partment of Conservation and Development through its Division of State Parks. -
NC State Parks' Connect NC Bond Program
NC State Parks’ Connect NC Bond Program Joint Legislative Oversight Committee For Capital Improvements December 13, 2017 Mike Murphy, Director 34 State Parks 4 State Recreation Areas 24 State Natural Areas 7 State Lakes 4 State Rivers NC State Parks System 6 State Trails Total Acreage: 232,108 NC State Parks - Connect NC State Trails Jockey’s Ridge Clingman’s Dome Fonta Flora ST Yadkin River ST Deep River ST French Broad ST Hickory Nut Gorge ST Collectively, state trails will total about 2,000 miles when complete + about 500 miles within state parks NC State Parks - Connect NC Fixed Assets and Value * Units $ Structures / contents 1,372 roofs $322.9 M Roads 349 miles $194.3 M Parking lots 9.2 M ft 2 $105.2 M Trails 494 miles $10.3 M Campsites 2,929 sites $28.5 M Total $661.1 M * Structures / contents are DOI estimates, others are DPR estimates NC State Parks - Connect NC 20,000,000 18,000,000 NC State Parks Visitation 1990 - 2016 16,000,000 14,000,000 Visitation 12,000,000 Population 10,000,000 8,000,000 6,000,000 Visitation in 2016 was nearly 18.8 million (+9%) 4,000,000 2,000,000 This occurred despite a hurricane and wildfires - NC State Parks - Connect NC 20,000,000 18,000,000 NC State Parks Visitation 1990 - 2016 16,000,000 14,000,000 Visitation 12,000,000 Population 10,000,000 8,000,000 6,000,000 Visitation to State Parks has greatly outpaced 4,000,000 population growth 2,000,000 Visitation +98% Population +52% - NC State Parks - Connect NC 20,000,000 18,000,000 NC State Parks Visitation 1990 - 2016 16,000,000 14,000,000 Visitation -
North Carolina STATE PARKS
North Carolina STATE PARKS North Carolina Department of Conservation and Development Division of State Parks North Carolina State Parks A guide to the areas set aside and maintained taining general information about the State as State Parks for the enjoyment of North Parks as a whole and brief word-and-picture Carolina's citizens and their guests — con- descriptions of each. f ) ) ) ) YOUR STATE PARKS THE STATE PARKS described in this well planned, well located, well equipped and booklet are the result of planning and well maintained State Parks are a matter of developing over a number of years. justifiable pride in which every citizen has Endowed by nature with ideal sites that a share. This is earned by your cooperation range from the shores of the Atlantic Ocean in observing the lenient rules and leaving the to the tops of the Blue Ridge Mountains, facilities and grounds clean and orderly. the State has located its State Parks for easy Keep this guide book for handy reference- access as well as for varied appeal. They use your State Parks year 'round for health- offer a choice of homelike convenience and ful recreation and relaxation! comfort in sturdy, modern facilities . the hardy outdoor life of tenting and camp cook- Amos R. Kearns, Chairman ing ... or the quick-and-easy freedom of a Hugh M. Morton, Vice Chairman day's picnicking. The State Parks offer excel- Walter J. Damtoft lent opportunities for economical vacations— Eric W. Rodgers either in the modern, fully equipped vacation Miles J. Smith cabins or in the campgrounds. -
Briefs for the Files
IES O E IES HARRY E. LeGRAND JR. (All dates 1984) COMMON LOON: At Lake Keowee, S.C., Douglas McNair counted 23 on 10 April, with a late bird there on 26 May. PIED-BILLED GREBE: An excellent inland count was 85, noted by Douglas McNair at Lake Keowee on 13 March. NORTHERN FULMAR: Apparently regular in early spring off the North Carolina coast, single birds (or the same individual) were noted 40 miles SSE of Beaufort Inlet on 7 April by Ricky Davis and party and on 12 April by Lloyd Davidson. BLACK-CAPPED PETREL: Ten were observed by Wayne Irvin, Dave Lee, and others on 3 March in the Gulf Stream off Cape Lookout, N.C. Very rare for South Carolina were four noted by Chris Haney on 11 May approximately 88 miles SE of Charleston. GREATER SHEARWATER: Rather early was one seen by Dennis Forsythe off Charleston on 7 May. MANX SHEARWATER: A good find was one, and possibly a second, off Cape Lookout on 3 March, as seen by Dave Lee, Harry LeGrand, and party. AUDUBON'S SHEARWATER: Chris Haney had an excellent total of 169 on 11 May off Charleston. WILSON'S STORM-PETREL: Dennis Forsythe observed one rather early on 7 May off Charleston. AMERICAN WHITE PELICAN: One was seen in the Morehead City, N.C., area on 15 March and for a week thereafter by Allyn Powell and others. Another was noted by Charlie Walters and Perry Nugent in Charleston harbor on 27 April. DOUBLE-CRESTED CORMORANT: Migrants inland continue to increase, and counts in triple digits are not unusual on some lakes. -
Mallard Creek
MALLARD DID YOU KNOW? Every Mecklenburg County creek except two starts in Mecklenburg. Mecklenburg County has 3,000 miles of creeks and streams. CREEK Two-thirds of Mecklenburg County is in the Catawba River watershed, and the creeks flow into Lake Norman, Mountain Island Lake, Lake Wylie or other parts of the Catawba River. The eastern third of Mecklenburg County is in the Yadkin-Pee Dee watershed. Those creeks eventually flow into the Pee Dee River. A “perennial” stream typically has water flowing in it year-round. Most of the water comes from smaller streams that flow in, or from groundwater, with some additional water from rain or other precipitation. Until the creeks became polluted, people swam in them, fished in them and got water from them. Mecklenburg County has 126 named creeks. This includes creeks whose name is “tributary of.” When the term “impaired,” is used for water, it means the body of water does not meet the standards that environmental laws set for it. What lives in a healthy creek? Aquatic life, which can include fish, small invertebrates such as snails and crawfish, insect larvae, tadpoles, plankton and algae. The cleaner the water, the more life in the creek. The most widespread problems for streams across the U.S. are nitrogen and phosphorus (called “nutrients”), sediments The Mallard Creek Mallard Creek’s tributaries, Around 1920, before there was a strong in the streambed, and activities that disturb the stream’s watershed is the flows through the campus system of public schools in Mecklenburg banks such as construction, farming or removing vegetation. -
Natural Mortality and Size Structure of Introduced Blue Catfish in Virginia Tidal Rivers
Introduced Blue Catfish Mortality and Size Structure . Hilling et al. Natural Mortality and Size Structure of Introduced Blue Catfish in Virginia Tidal Rivers Corbin D. Hilling, Department of Fish and Wildlife Conservation, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA 24061 Aaron J. Bunch, Virginia Department of Game and Inland Fisheries, Charles City, VA 23030 Robert S. Greenlee, Virginia Department of Game and Inland Fisheries, Charles City, VA 23030 Donald J. Orth, Department of Fish and Wildlife Conservation, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA 24061 Yan Jiao, Department of Fish and Wildlife Conservation, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA 24061 Abstract: In the 1970s and 1980s, blue catfish Ictalurus( furcatus) were introduced to the tidal rivers of Virginia. Current abundances and uncertainty about population characteristics of blue catfish generated concern for other economically important and imperiled species. We estimated natural mor- tality and size structure of blue catfish for four tidal river systems (i.e., James, Mattaponi, Pamunkey and Rappahannock). Using common empirical estimators with pooled data from the period 2002–2016, we calculated five estimates of natural mortality. Proportional size distributions were used to examine changes in size structure over time. Maximum observed age of 25 years indicated mature populations. Estimated mean instantaneous natural mortality (M) from five empirical estimators ranged from 0.13–0.19 in the four rivers. Temporal trends in size structure differed among rivers, likely due to differences in stocking timing and riverine productivity. Proportions of memorable and trophy size blue catfish appear to have recently declined in three of four rivers, but size-structure indices demonstrated continued viability of the James River trophy fishery. -
Stone Mountain State Park
OUR CHANGING LAND Stone Mountain State Park An Environmental Education Learning Experience Designed for Grades 4-8 “The face of places, and their forms decay; And what is solid earth, that once was sea; Seas, in their turn, retreating from the shore, Make solid land, what ocean was before.” - Ovid Metamorphoses, XV “The earth is not finished, but is now being, and will forevermore be remade.” - C.R. Van Hise Renowned geologist, 1898 i Funding for the second edition of this Environmental Education Learning Experience was contributed by: N.C. Division of Land Resources, Department of Environment and Natural Resources, and the N.C. Mining Commission ii This Environmental Education Learning Experience was developed by Larry Trivette Lead Interpretation and Education Ranger Stone Mountain State Park; and Lea J. Beazley, Interpretation and Education Specialist North Carolina State Parks N.C. Division of Parks and Recreation Department of Environment and Natural Resources Michael F. Easley William G. Ross, Jr. Governor Secretary iii Other Contributors . Park volunteers; Carl Merschat, Mark Carter and Tyler Clark, N.C. Geological Survey, Division of Land Resources; Tracy Davis, N.C. Division of Land Resources; The N.C. Department of Public Instruction; The N.C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources; and the many individuals and agencies who assisted in the review of this publication. 385 copies of this public document were printed at a cost of $2,483.25 or $6.45 per copy Printed on recycled paper. 10-02 iv Table of Contents 1. Introduction • Introduction to the North Carolina State Parks System.......................................... 1.1 • Introduction to Stone Mountain State Park ........................................................... -
Carolina Thread Trail Master Plan for Catawba County Communities
CAROLINA THREAD TRAIL MASTER PLAN FOR CATAWBA COUNTY COMMUNITIES December 2010 The Vision “The Carolina Thread Trail is a regional trail network that will eventually reach 15 counties and over 2 million people. Simply put, it will link people and places. It will link cities, towns, and attractions. More than a hiking trail, more than a bike path, the Carolina Thread Trail will preserve our natural areas and will be a place for exploration of nature, culture, science and history, for family adventures and celebrations of friendship. It will be for young and old, athlete and average. This is a landmark project. A legacy that will give so much, to so many, for so long.” -from the Carolina Thread Trail Table of Contents Acknowledgements .........................................................................................................................................01 Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................................03 Chapter 1: Introduction Carolina Thread Trail ...................................................................................................................................... 06 Chapter 2: Greenway Benefits Health Benefits ............................................................................................................................................... 09 Improved Environmental Quality .................................................................................................................... -
Aquatic Nuisance Species Management Plan
NORTH CAROLINA ria ut N e Mystery er Prim es S Wat ros in na e Ch il Aquatic ish F on Nuisance Li rn Sna Species Nor the kehead Marbled Cray fish Hydrill a h Spo fis tted Jelly MANAGEMENT PLAN NORTH CAROLINA AQUATIC NUISANCE SPECIES MANAGEMENT PLAN Prepared by the NC Aquatic Nuisance Species Management Plan Committee October 1, 2015 Approved by: Steve Troxler, Commissioner North Carolina Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services Donald R. van der Vaart, Secretary North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality Gordon Myers, Executive Director North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgements Executive Summary I. Introduction .....................................................................................................................................................................................................................1 The difference between Aquatic Invasive Species (AIS) and Aquatic Nuisance Species (ANS) ................................................................5 Plan Purpose, Scope and Development ............................................................................................................................................................................. 5 Aquatic Invasive Species Vectors and Impacts ............................................................................................................................................................... 6 Interactions with Other Plan ................................................................................................................................................................................................ -
North Carolina Archaeology Vol. 51
North Carolina Archaeology (formerly Southern Indian Studies) Published jointly by The North Carolina Archaeological Society, Inc. 109 East Jones Street Raleigh, NC 27601-2807 and The Research Laboratories of Archaeology University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3120 R. P. Stephen Davis, Jr., Editor Officers of the North Carolina Archaeological Society President: Kenneth Suggs, 1411 Fort Bragg Road, Fayetteville, NC 28305. Vice President: Thomas Beaman, 126 Canterbury Road, Wilson, NC 27896. Secretary: Linda Carnes-McNaughton, Historic Sites Section, N.C. Division of Archives and History, 4621 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-4621. Treasurer: E. William Conen, 804 Kingswood Dr., Cary, NC 27513. Editor: R. P. Stephen Davis, Jr., Research Laboratories of Archaeology, CB 3120, Alumni Building, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3120. Associate Editor (Newsletter): Dee Nelms, Office of State Archaeology, N.C. Division of Archives and History, 4619 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-4619. At-Large Members: Barbara Brooks, Underwater Archaeology Unit, P.O. Box 58, Kure Beach, NC 28449. Jane Eastman, Anthropology and Sociology Department, East Carolina University, Cullowhee, NC 28723. Linda Hall, High Country Archaeological Services, 132 Sugar Cove Road, Weaverville, NC 28787. John Hildebrand, 818 Winston Avenue, Fayetteville, NC 28303. Terri Russ, 105 East Charles Street, Grifton, NC 28530. Shane Peterson, N.C. Department of Transportation, P.O. Box 25201, Raleigh, NC 27611. Information for Subscribers North Carolina Archaeology is published once a year in October. Subscription is by membership in the North Carolina Archaeological Society, Inc. Annual dues are $15.00 for regular members, $25.00 for sustaining members, $10.00 for students, $20.00 for families, $250.00 for life members, $250.00 for corporate members, and $25.00 for institutional subscribers. -
United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Southern
United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Southern Research Station General Technical Report SRS–161 July 2012 Lafayette, Russell; Brooks, Maureen T.; Potyondy, John P.; Audin, Lisa; Krieger, Suzanne L.; Trettin, Carl C. Eds. 2012. Cumulative watershed effects of fuel management in the Eastern United States. Gen. Tech. Rep. SRS-161. Asheville, NC: U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Southern Research Station, 327 p. AbstrAct As a result of effective fire suppression activities over the last 75 years and a reduction in timber harvesting on the national forests, biomass has accumulated increasing the susceptibility of large and more severe wildfires. Reducing accumulated fuels is now a major management objective on the national forests. A combination of traditional silvicultural treatments such as prescribed fire and thinning and new innovations are needed to address the myriad of site conditions. Effective fuels management should improve the health of the watershed ensuring the sustainability of the goods and services that are derived from the landscape. However, since fuels management necessarily interacts with other land management considerations and often requires periodic treatments, assessing the cumulative effects can be daunting. This volume and a companion volume focusing on the Western United States (Elliott and others 2010) were designed to provide land managers with a synthesis of the science to support an assessment of the cumulative effects of fuels treatments on forested watersheds in the conterminous United States. This volume is organized to into three sections, an overview of the biophysiography of the Eastern United States, consideration of ecosystem components and how fuel treatments may affect specific processes or properties, and the third section synthesizes fuels management practices and effects in the major ecosystem types of the region.