Download the Scanned
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Mineral Processing
Mineral Processing Foundations of theory and practice of minerallurgy 1st English edition JAN DRZYMALA, C. Eng., Ph.D., D.Sc. Member of the Polish Mineral Processing Society Wroclaw University of Technology 2007 Translation: J. Drzymala, A. Swatek Reviewer: A. Luszczkiewicz Published as supplied by the author ©Copyright by Jan Drzymala, Wroclaw 2007 Computer typesetting: Danuta Szyszka Cover design: Danuta Szyszka Cover photo: Sebastian Bożek Oficyna Wydawnicza Politechniki Wrocławskiej Wybrzeze Wyspianskiego 27 50-370 Wroclaw Any part of this publication can be used in any form by any means provided that the usage is acknowledged by the citation: Drzymala, J., Mineral Processing, Foundations of theory and practice of minerallurgy, Oficyna Wydawnicza PWr., 2007, www.ig.pwr.wroc.pl/minproc ISBN 978-83-7493-362-9 Contents Introduction ....................................................................................................................9 Part I Introduction to mineral processing .....................................................................13 1. From the Big Bang to mineral processing................................................................14 1.1. The formation of matter ...................................................................................14 1.2. Elementary particles.........................................................................................16 1.3. Molecules .........................................................................................................18 1.4. Solids................................................................................................................19 -
Annual Report 2010
Annual Report 2010 THE MACAULAY LAND USE RESEARCH INSTITUTE Annual Report 2010 The Macaulay Land Use Research Institute Annual Report 2010 ISBN: 978-0-902701-09-0 © The Macaulay Land Use Research Institue, September 2010 Craigiebuckler Aberdeen AB15 8QH Tel +44 (0) 1224 395000 Fax +44 (0) 1224 395010 macaulay.ac.uk A SCOTTISH CHARITABLE COMPANY LIMITED BY GUARANTEE - REGISTERED IN EDINBURGH – No SCO16190 REGISTERED OFFICE: MACAULAY LAND USE RESEARCH INSTITUTE, CRAIGIEBUCKLER, ABERDEEN, AB15 8QH SCOTLAND, CHARITY No: 11922, VAT REGISTRATION No: GB 266 8932 11 THE MACAULAY LAND USE RESEARCH INSTITUTE Executive Editor Professor Richard Aspinall Associate Editor Clare Neely Scientific Editors Dr Dick Birnie, Professor Colin Campbell, Dr Tony Craig, Dr Bob Ferrier, Dr Pete Goddard, Professor David Miller, Dr Robin Matthews, Professor Bill Slee Technical Editors Carol Bisset, Dr Andy Midwood Graphics and Production John Brown, Pat Carnegie Photography David Riley 3 4 THE MACAULAY LAND USE RESEARCH INSTITUTE The Macaulay Land Use Research Institute The Macaulay Land Use Research Institute is an international centre for scientific research and consultancy on the: l Economic, social and environmental consequences of rural land uses l Impacts of potential changes in policy, management, climate and pollution for the management of natural resources, and sustainable rural development Our research provides new and impartial knowledge that contributes to environmental and rural development policy, both in Scotland and internationally and we are committed to ensuring that this knowledge is shared and effectively communicated to all interested parties. We are internationally recognised as a leader in land use research and we transfer our skills and experience through collaborations within over 40 countries worldwide. -
A New Layered Silicate with an Original Type of Siliconðoxygen Networks O
ISSN 1063-7745, Crystallography Reports, 2008, Vol. 53, No. 2, pp. 206–215. © Pleiades Publishing, Inc., 2008. Original Russian Text © O.V. Yakubovich, W. Massa, N.V. Chukanov, 2008, published in Kristallografiya, 2008, Vol. 53, No. 2, pp. 233–242. STRUCTURE OF INORGANIC COMPOUNDS Crystal Structure of Britvinite [Pb7(OH)3F(BO3)2(CO3)][Mg4.5(OH)3(Si5O14)]: A New Layered Silicate with an Original Type of Silicon–Oxygen Networks O. V. Yakubovicha, W. Massab, and N. V. Chukanovc a Lomonosov Moscow State University, Leninskie gory, Moscow, 119992 Russia e-mail: [email protected] b Philipps-Universität Marburg, Biegenstrasse 10, Marburg, D-35032 Germany c Institute of Problems of Chemical Physics, Russian Academy of Sciences, Chernogolovka, Moscow oblast, 142432 Russia Received January 25, 2007 Abstract—The crystal structure of a new mineral britvinite Pb7.1Mg4.5(Si4.8Al0.2O14)(BO3)(CO3)[(BO3)0.7(SiO4)0.3](OH, F)6.7 from the Lángban iron–manganese skarn deposit (Värmland, Sweden) is determined at T = 173 K using X-ray diffraction (Stoe IPDS diffractometer, λ α θ MoK , graphite monochromator, 2 max = 58.43°, R = 0.052 for 6262 reflections). The main crystal data are as follows: a = 9.3409(8) Å, b = 9.3579(7) Å, c = 18.8333(14) Å, α = 80.365(6)°, β = 75.816 + (6)°, γ = 3 ρ 3 59.870(5)°, V = 1378.7(2) Å , space group P1 , Z = 2, and calc = 5.42 g/cm . The idealized structural formula of the mineral is represented as [Pb7(OH)3F(BO3)2(CO3)][Mg4.5(OH)3(Si5O14)]. -
Gaspéite-Magnesite Solid Solutions and Their Significance
78 Advances in Regolith GASPÉITE-MAGNESITE SOLID SOLUTIONS AND THEIR SIGNIFICANCE Meagan E. Clissold, Peter Leverett & Peter A. Williams School of Science, Food and Horticulture, University of Western Sydney, Locked Bag 1797, Penrith South DC NSW 1797 It is a surprising fact that, despite the increasing number of secondary minerals of Ni(II) recognized from oxidized base metal deposits (Anthony et al. 2003), the supergene chemistry responsible for their formation remains poorly understood. An understanding of this chemistry would be desirable in view of its importance with respect to geochemical exploration for the element, its behaviour in the regolith and the potential development of commercially exploitable secondary nickel resources. Of the secondary nickel minerals known, gaspéite, NiCO3, is perhaps the most common and has been observed in a number of Western Australian deposits. Notable among these is the 132 pit at Widgiemooltha, near Kambalda, WA (Nickel et al.1994). The supergene profile of the 132 pit consists of 5 zones: oxide, carbonate, violarite-pyrite, transition and primary zone. The carbonate zone is 3-12 m below surface and is characterized by the occurrence of a number of flat-lying to sub-horizontal veins of gaspéite that cut across altered wall rock comprising tremolite and goethite. These veins extend from what was a large sulfide body across the matrix layer. Single gaspéite veins have a size of 5 x 5 x 0.05 m on average and may occur in masses of up to 10 x 10 x 1 m; they are typically massive to either granular or fibrous. From the lower part of the carbonate zone upwards there is a progressive decrease in the amount of gaspéite and other carbonate minerals, and their respective nickel contents. -
Violarite Fe2+Ni S4
2+ 3+ Violarite Fe Ni2 S4 c 2001-2005 Mineral Data Publishing, version 1 Crystal Data: Cubic. Point Group: 4/m 32/m. As nodules up to 0.5 cm and massive. Physical Properties: Cleavage: Perfect on {001}. Tenacity: Brittle. Hardness = 4.5–5.5 VHN = 455–493 (100 g load). D(meas.) = n.d. D(calc.) = 4.79 Optical Properties: Opaque. Color: Violet-gray; distinctly violet in reflected light. Luster: Metallic. R: (400) 39.0, (420) 39.6, (440) 40.2, (460) 40.6, (480) 41.0, (500) 41.4, (520) 41.9, (540) 42.5, (560) 43.1, (580) 43.8, (600) 44.3, (620) 44.8, (640) 45.4, (660) 45.8, (680) 46.2, (700) 46.6 Cell Data: Space Group: Fd3m. a = 9.51 Z = 8 X-ray Powder Pattern: Vermilion mine, Sudbury, Canada. 2.85 (100), 1.674 (80), 1.820 (60), 2.36 (50), 1.059 (50), 1.183 (40), 1.115 (40) Chemistry: (1) (2) (3) Fe 17.01 19.33 18.52 Ni 38.68 33.94 38.94 Co 1.05 2.50 Cu 1.12 1.05 S 41.68 42.17 42.54 insol. 0.40 1.31 Total 99.94 100.30 100.00 (1) Vermilion mine, Sudbury, Canada; contains trace chalcopyrite. (2) Friday mine, Julian, California, USA; contains trace chalcopyrite. (3) FeNi2S4. Mineral Group: Linnaeite group. Occurrence: Of hydrothermal origin, with other sulfides. Association: Pyrrhotite, millerite, chalcopyrite, pentlandite. Distribution: In the USA, from the Friday mine, Julian, San Diego Co., California; the Key West mine, Clark Co., Nevada; the Copper King mine, Gold Hill district, Boulder Co., Colorado; the Lick Fork deposit, Floyd Co., Virginia; and the Gap Nickel mine, Lancaster Co., Pennsylvania. -
IMA Master List
The New IMA List of Minerals – A Work in Progress – Update: February 2013 In the following pages of this document a comprehensive list of all valid mineral species is presented. The list is distributed (for terms and conditions see below) via the web site of the Commission on New Minerals, Nomenclature and Classification of the International Mineralogical Association, which is the organization in charge for approval of new minerals, and more in general for all issues related to the status of mineral species. The list, which will be updated on a regular basis, is intended as the primary and official source on minerals. Explanation of column headings: Name: it is the presently accepted mineral name (and in the table, minerals are sorted by name). Chemical formula: it is the CNMNC-approved formula. IMA status: A = approved (it applies to minerals approved after the establishment of the IMA in 1958); G = grandfathered (it applies to minerals discovered before the birth of IMA, and generally considered as valid species); Rd = redefined (it applies to existing minerals which were redefined during the IMA era); Rn = renamed (it applies to existing minerals which were renamed during the IMA era); Q = questionable (it applies to poorly characterized minerals, whose validity could be doubtful). IMA No. / Year: for approved minerals the IMA No. is given: it has the form XXXX-YYY, where XXXX is the year and YYY a sequential number; for grandfathered minerals the year of the original description is given. In some cases, typically for Rd and Rn minerals, the year may be followed by s.p. -
Robert T Downs
Curriculum Vitae – Robert T. Downs 1 Field of Specialization: The crystallography and spectroscopy of minerals, with emphasis on crystal chemistry, bonding, temperature and pressure effects, characterization and identification. Contact Information: Dr Robert T Downs Department of Geosciences Voice: 520-626-8092 Gould-Simpson Building Lab: 520-626-3845 University of Arizona Fax: 520-621-2672 Tucson Arizona 85721-0077 [email protected] Education: University of British Columbia 1986 B.S. Mathematics Virginia Tech 1989 M.S. Geological Sciences Virginia Tech 1992 Ph.D. Geological Sciences Graduate Advisors: G.V. Gibbs (Mineralogy) and M.B. Boisen, Jr. (Mathematics) Carnegie Institution of Washington, Geophysical Laboratory, 1993 – 1996 Post-doc Advisors: R.M. Hazen and L.W. Finger Academic and Professional Appointments: Assistant Professor, Department of Geosciences, University of Arizona, August 1996 – 2002 Associate Professor, Department of Geosciences, University of Arizona, 2002 – 2008 Professor, Department of Geosciences, University of Arizona, 2008 – present Assistant to curator Joe Nagel: University of British Columbia, 1985 Assistant to curator Gary Ansell: National Mineral Collections of Canada, 1986 Assistant to curator Susan Eriksson: Virginia Tech Museum of Geological Sciences, 1990 Graduate teaching assistant: Virginia Tech, 1988 – 1992 Pre-doctoral Fellowship: Carnegie Institution of Washington, Geophysical Laboratory, 1991 Post-doctoral Fellowship: CIW, Geophysical Laboratory, February 1993 – July 1996 Visiting Professor, -
Sell-0567 , AGS Field Guide to Superior Area, Oct 1995
CONTACT INFORMATION Mining Records Curator Arizona Geological Survey 416 W. Congress St., Suite 100 Tucson, Arizona 85701 520-770-3500 http://www.azgs.az.gov [email protected] The following file is part of the James Doyle Sell Mining Collection ACCESS STATEMENT These digitized collections are accessible for purposes of education and research. We have indicated what we know about copyright and rights of privacy, publicity, or trademark. Due to the nature of archival collections, we are not always able to identify this information. We are eager to hear from any rights owners, so that we may obtain accurate information. Upon request, we will remove material from public view while we address a rights issue. CONSTRAINTS STATEMENT The Arizona Geological Survey does not claim to control all rights for all materials in its collection. These rights include, but are not limited to: copyright, privacy rights, and cultural protection rights. The User hereby assumes all responsibility for obtaining any rights to use the material in excess of “fair use.” The Survey makes no intellectual property claims to the products created by individual authors in the manuscript collections, except when the author deeded those rights to the Survey or when those authors were employed by the State of Arizona and created intellectual products as a function of their official duties. The Survey does maintain property rights to the physical and digital representations of the works. QUALITY STATEMENT The Arizona Geological Survey is not responsible for the accuracy of the records, information, or opinions that may be contained in the files. The Survey collects, catalogs, and archives data on mineral properties regardless of its views of the veracity or accuracy of those data. -
Sulfide Minerals in the G and H Chromitite Zones of the Stillwater Complex, Montana
Sulfide Minerals in the G and H Chromitite Zones of the Stillwater Complex, Montana GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 694 Sulfide Minerals in the G and H Chromitite Zones of the Stillwater Complex, Montana By NORMAN J PAGE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 694 The relationship of the amount, relative abundance, and size of grains of selected sulfide minerals to the crystallization of a basaltic magma UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON: 1971 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR ROGERS C. B. MORTON, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY William T. Pecora, Director Library of CongresR catalog-card No. 70-610589 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printin&' Otrice Washin&'ton, D.C. 20402 - Price 35 cents (paper cover) CONTENTS Page Abstract------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1 Introduction________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 1 Acknowledgments--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 4 Sulfide occurrences-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 4 Sulfide inclusions in cumulus minerals_____________________________________________________________________________ 4 Fabrtc______________________________________________________________________________________________________ 5 Phase assemblages__________________________________________________________________________________________ -
Minerals Found in Michigan Listed by County
Michigan Minerals Listed by Mineral Name Based on MI DEQ GSD Bulletin 6 “Mineralogy of Michigan” Actinolite, Dickinson, Gogebic, Gratiot, and Anthonyite, Houghton County Marquette counties Anthophyllite, Dickinson, and Marquette counties Aegirinaugite, Marquette County Antigorite, Dickinson, and Marquette counties Aegirine, Marquette County Apatite, Baraga, Dickinson, Houghton, Iron, Albite, Dickinson, Gratiot, Houghton, Keweenaw, Kalkaska, Keweenaw, Marquette, and Monroe and Marquette counties counties Algodonite, Baraga, Houghton, Keweenaw, and Aphrosiderite, Gogebic, Iron, and Marquette Ontonagon counties counties Allanite, Gogebic, Iron, and Marquette counties Apophyllite, Houghton, and Keweenaw counties Almandite, Dickinson, Keweenaw, and Marquette Aragonite, Gogebic, Iron, Jackson, Marquette, and counties Monroe counties Alunite, Iron County Arsenopyrite, Marquette, and Menominee counties Analcite, Houghton, Keweenaw, and Ontonagon counties Atacamite, Houghton, Keweenaw, and Ontonagon counties Anatase, Gratiot, Houghton, Keweenaw, Marquette, and Ontonagon counties Augite, Dickinson, Genesee, Gratiot, Houghton, Iron, Keweenaw, Marquette, and Ontonagon counties Andalusite, Iron, and Marquette counties Awarurite, Marquette County Andesine, Keweenaw County Axinite, Gogebic, and Marquette counties Andradite, Dickinson County Azurite, Dickinson, Keweenaw, Marquette, and Anglesite, Marquette County Ontonagon counties Anhydrite, Bay, Berrien, Gratiot, Houghton, Babingtonite, Keweenaw County Isabella, Kalamazoo, Kent, Keweenaw, Macomb, Manistee, -
Sursassite: Hydrogen Bonding, Cation Order, and Pumpellyite Intergrowth
American Mineralogist, Volume 94, pages 1440–1449, 2009 Sursassite: Hydrogen bonding, cation order, and pumpellyite intergrowth MARIKO NAGASHIMA ,1,* MASAHIDE AKASAKA ,2 TETSUO MINAKAWA ,3 EUGEN LIBOWITZKY,4 AND THOMAS ARMBRUSTER 1 1Mineralogical Crystallography, Institute of Geological Sciences, University of Bern, Freiestrasse 3, CH-3012 Bern, Switzerland 2Department of Geoscience, Faculty of Science and Engineering, Shimane University, Matsue 690-8504, Japan 3Department of Earth Science, Faculty of Science, Ehime University, Matsuyama 790-5877, Japan 4Institute of Mineralogy and Crystallography, University of Vienna—Geocenter, Althanstrasse 14, A-1090 Vienna, Austria ABSTRACT 2+ The crystal chemistry of sursassite, simplified formula Mn2 Al3Si3O11(OH)3, from six different localities [(1) Falotta, Switzerland, (2) Woodstock, New Brunswick, Canada, (3) Kamisugai, Japan, (4) Kamogawa, Japan, (5) Molinello, Italy, and (6) Gambatesa, Italy] was studied using electron mi- croprobe analysis (EMPA), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), and single-crystal X-ray diffraction methods. The structure has two symmetry independent Mn sites. The Mn1 site is seven coordinated by O and hosts, in addition to Mn2+, up to 20% Ca, whereas Mn2 has octahedral coordina- tion and is strongly selective for Mn2+. In the simplified formula, three smaller octahedral M sites are occupied by Al. However, M1 also accepts significant amounts of divalent cations, such as Cu, Mg, Fe, and Mn, whereas M2 is occupied exclusively by Al. The unit-cell parameters of sursassite are a = 8.698–8.728, b = 5.789–5.807, c = 9.778–9.812 Å, β = 108.879–109.060°, V = 465.7–470.0 Å3, the space group is P21/m. -
STRONG and WEAK INTERLAYER INTERACTIONS of TWO-DIMENSIONAL MATERIALS and THEIR ASSEMBLIES Tyler William Farnsworth a Dissertati
STRONG AND WEAK INTERLAYER INTERACTIONS OF TWO-DIMENSIONAL MATERIALS AND THEIR ASSEMBLIES Tyler William Farnsworth A dissertation submitted to the faculty at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Chemistry. Chapel Hill 2018 Approved by: Scott C. Warren James F. Cahoon Wei You Joanna M. Atkin Matthew K. Brennaman © 2018 Tyler William Farnsworth ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ii ABSTRACT Tyler William Farnsworth: Strong and weak interlayer interactions of two-dimensional materials and their assemblies (Under the direction of Scott C. Warren) The ability to control the properties of a macroscopic material through systematic modification of its component parts is a central theme in materials science. This concept is exemplified by the assembly of quantum dots into 3D solids, but the application of similar design principles to other quantum-confined systems, namely 2D materials, remains largely unexplored. Here I demonstrate that solution-processed 2D semiconductors retain their quantum-confined properties even when assembled into electrically conductive, thick films. Structural investigations show how this behavior is caused by turbostratic disorder and interlayer adsorbates, which weaken interlayer interactions and allow access to a quantum- confined but electronically coupled state. I generalize these findings to use a variety of 2D building blocks to create electrically conductive 3D solids with virtually any band gap. I next introduce a strategy for discovering new 2D materials. Previous efforts to identify novel 2D materials were limited to van der Waals layered materials, but I demonstrate that layered crystals with strong interlayer interactions can be exfoliated into few-layer or monolayer materials.