362 Edward Cohn the High Title of a Communist by Edward Cohn Is A

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

362 Edward Cohn the High Title of a Communist by Edward Cohn Is A 362 Book Reviews Edward Cohn The High Title of a Communist: Postwar Party Discipline and the Values of the Soviet Regime (DeKalb, il: Northern Illinois University Press, 2015), 260 pp., $49.00 (hb), isbn 9780875804897. The High Title of a Communist by Edward Cohn is a welcome new book on a rather neglected topic of the Communist party in the post-wwii period. It deals with three main themes: the impact of the Great Patriotic War on Soviet society, the continuity between late Stalinism and Khrushchev’s Thaw, and the role of the Communist Party’s disciplinary practices in shaping post-war social and political norms. The monograph carries on a recent trend in the scholarship by focusing on the continuity between the late Stalinist period and the Khrushchev era. The chosen chronological framework of 1945 to 1964 shapes the argument of the book, while by singling out wwii as the principal watershed in Soviet history it continues the trend set by scholars such as Stephen Lovell in ‘The Shadow of War’ or works by Geoffrey Hosking before that.1 There are welcome comparisons with the rest of post-wwii Europe, par- ticularly in Chapter 2, which discusses the Communist Party policy towards communists who lived in occupied territories. Similarly, post-war attitudes to gender are treated from a broad comparative perspective, as are changing at- titudes to corruption discussed below. Most of the monograph, however, is focused on much narrower disciplin- ary practices in the Communists Party during this period. There is a detailed breakdown of the hierarchy of party punishments, illustrated by a number of individual cases, plenty of quantitative data on party membership and expul- sion rates. The core argument is the transformation of the Communist Party from a revolutionary party into a party of power closely linked to the Soviet administrative apparatus (p. 17). This is not a new argument, for example, Leon Trotsky’s critique of Stalin went along similar lines, but Cohn argues that the final transformation happened precisely in the period under consideration. This was due to several factors, such as the death of old communists in the war, a greater influx of new members (e.g. 20% growth in 1945–53 and 60% growth in 1953–64, from 6.9 to 11 million members), as well as the party’s in- creasingly middle class membership; sluzhachshie (the Soviet term for white collar workers) already constituted 46.7% of membership in 1945 (p. 21). 1 Geoffrey Hosking, ‘The Second World War and Russian National Consciousness’, Past & Present, No. 175 (May, 2002): 162–187. © koninklijke brill nv, leiden, 2016 | doi 10.1163/18763324-00001248Downloaded from Brill.com10/01/2021 11:57:53PM via free access <UN> Book Reviews 363 The evolution of Party attitudes towards political beliefs and activities of its members is discussed in Chapter 3. In keeping with the main narrative of evo- lution, as opposed to a radical break under Khrushchev, Cohn argues that al- ready after 1945 there was considerably less interest in political loyalty of party members, as the party no longer prioritized investigation of social origins or the political orthodoxy of the rank and file: “unless they were Jewish, rank and file Communists were less likely to be expelled because of their political views or social class than at any time since the revolution” (p. 84). Instead, educa- tion, training and nationality became important factors in determining party membership. In fact, this change is traced to the Eighteenth Party Congress of 1939, which signaled an end to mass purges and a broader acceptance of white collar workers into the party, for example, by eliminating a bias in membership admission requirements based on social background which had privileged the working class (p. 13). One aspect of the party evolution in the post-war period that could have been given more detailed analysis was the Nineteenth Party Congress, particu- larly the re-launch of party revivalism. As Yoram Gorlizki argued, this in many ways laid the groundwork for Khrushchev era’s focus on the Communist party as the stimulant to other social and economic institutions and reforms.2 Given its focus on the continuity between late Stalin and Khrushchev, a discussion of the party revivalism would further strengthen Cohn’s overall argument. One of the distinct features of the Khrushchev period was the rehabilitation of Stalin’s victims. Cohn draws attention to an important distinction between a legal rehabilitation by the state, and a separate process of readmission into the Communist Party. Despite large scale legal rehabilitations of Stalin’s vic- tims, very few of them were allowed to become Party members again. The Committee of Party Control (the kpk, the highest disciplinary body in the cpsu) restored to the party 5,000 purge victims in 1956–60, with further 30,000 reinstated or posthumously rehabilitated by lower level party committees. As Cohn notes, rehabilitation was biased toward former high-ranking officials with some 70% of rehabilitated communists being ‘leading workers’, as mem- bers of nomenklatura were known (p. 97). The low number of re-instated ordinary communists is explained by the fact that most of individual rehabilitation initiative had to come from below, while facing substantial bureaucratic hurdles. In keeping with the traditional criti- cism of Khrushchev’s de-Stalinization as being selective for political reasons, Cohn notes there was virtually no one rehabilitated who had been expelled prior to 1937, the start of the Great Purge. 2 Yoram Gorlizki, ‘Party Revivalism and the Death of Stalin’, Slavic Review, 54/1 (1995): 1–22. the soviet and post-soviet review 44 (2017) 357-378Downloaded from Brill.com10/01/2021 11:57:53PM via free access <UN> 364 Book Reviews The Khrushchev era also saw a change of Party attitudes towards pows, a previously stigmatized group, although Cohn argues that this seems to have been reversed after 1959 as the rehabilitation achieved most of political goals (p. 105). Likewise, the purges of the security organs of those responsible for breaches of “socialist legality” were very few and highly selective even at the peak of de-Stalinization (p. 110–12). This allowed the party to present itself as a victim rather than the perpetrator of the purges without destabilizing the regime, which still relied on the security services for its stability. The last three chapters deal with specific issues that preoccupied Party local organizations: economic misdemeanors or corruption; family affairs of party members; and the persistent problem of drunkenness among party members. Chapter 4 accordingly examines how the Party officials handled cases of corruption, administrative misconduct and economic crimes by its members. These were the most common causes of expulsion from the Party, with some 300,000 communists losing their party membership in 1945–1964 on that basis (p. 116). There is a welcome discussion of general literature on the subject of corruption and its relation to the Soviet Union, showing that the Soviet under- standing of corruption was becoming strikingly similar to the Western political science’s definition of it as “using public office for private gain” (what Cohn calls “service position” sluzhebnoe polozhenie, perhaps better translated into English as “official position”). This was reflected in the shift of labelling eco- nomic crimes from politically charged terms of “sabotage” and “bourgeois ac- cumulation” common in the 1930s, to “the abuse of service position for private gain” after the war (p. 122). This discussion of corruption is focused mostly on the late Stalinist period, noting relatively tolerant attitudes towards corruption under Stalin, particu- larly at a local level as shown, for example, in cases of currency manipulation in the city of Molotov’s obkom during the 1947 currency reform (p. 128). The Khrushchev period had its share of anti-corruption campaigns too, with some 10,000 communists expelled annually. However, these anti-corruption campaigns were on the whole much less stringent, with the rate of expulsions being a third of that under Stalin. This lower rate of expulsion reflected what Cohn persistently draws attention to: a significant change in Party discipline under Khrushchev, namely its increasing emphasis on the persuasion and edu- cation of its members, rather than on punishment as before (p. 138). Although the party under Khrushchev became less repressive, at least judg- ing by the number of expulsions, Cohn argues that at the same time it became much more intrusive into private lives of its members (p. 142). According to Cohn, one of the notable changes in the Khrushchev period was the emphasis on education by means of public pressure (152–153). This could take various the soviet and post-sovietDownloaded review from 44 Brill.com10/01/2021 (2017) 357-378 11:57:53PM via free access <UN> Book Reviews 365 forms, as several cases cited in the book illustrate, from attempts to force a rec- onciliation between spouses, to reprimands and to expulsion from the party. The argument in this part of the book would be enriched if there was some analysis of social background of the cases discussed. Most of the cases on family affairs and drunkenness come from provincial factories, particularly Molotov (present day Perm) and Kalinin (present day Tver). Was domestic vio- lence and heavy drinking more prevalent among communists in manual labor occupations? If so, does it explain to some extent relatively lenient attitudes of the party towards such misdemeanors? And was the treatment of rank and file communists from working class backgrounds (the vast majority of cases), also applied to party functionaries? Some statistical or qualitative data on these question could help to understand the extent to which the party actually took seriously its utopian goal of transforming the consciousness of population, a task which Cohn argues it had failed (p.
Recommended publications
  • Course Handbook
    SL12 Page 1 of 29 UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE DEPARTMENT OF SLAVONIC STUDIES PAPER SL12: SOCIALIST RUSSIA 1917-1991 HANDBOOK Daria Mattingly [email protected] SL12 Page 2 of 29 INTRODUCTION COURSE AIMS The course is designed to provide you with a thorough grounding in and advanced understanding of Russia’s social, political and economic history in the period under review and to prepare you for the exam, all the while fostering in you deep interest in Soviet history. BEFORE THE COURSE BEGINS Familiarise yourself with the general progression of Soviet history by reading through one or more of the following: Applebaum, A. Red Famine. Stalin's War on Ukraine (2017) Figes, Orlando Revolutionary Russia, 1891-1991 (2014) Hobsbawm, E. J. The Age of Extremes 1914-1991 (1994) Kenez, Peter A History of the Soviet Union from the Beginning to the End (2006) Lovell, Stephen The Soviet Union: A Very Short Introduction (2009) Suny, Ronald Grigor The Soviet Experiment: Russia, the USSR, and the Successor States (2010) Briefing meeting: There’ll be a meeting on the Wednesday before the first teaching day of Michaelmas. Check with the departmental secretary for time and venue. It’s essential that you attend and bring this handbook with you. COURSE STRUCTURE The course comprises four elements: lectures, seminars, supervisions and reading. Lectures: you’ll have sixteen lectures, eight in Michaelmas and eight in Lent. The lectures provide an introduction to and overview of the course, but no more. It’s important to understand that the lectures alone won’t enable you to cover the course, nor will they by themselves prepare you for the exam.
    [Show full text]
  • BETWEEN CREATION and CRISIS: SOVIET MASCULINITIES, CONSUMPTION, and BODIES AFTER STALIN by Brandon Gray Miller a DISSERTATION Su
    BETWEEN CREATION AND CRISIS: SOVIET MASCULINITIES, CONSUMPTION, AND BODIES AFTER STALIN By Brandon Gray Miller A DISSERTATION Submitted to Michigan State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of History – Doctor of Philosophy 2013 ABSTRACT BETWEEN CREATION AND CRISIS: SOVIET MASCULINITIES, CONSUMPTION, AND BODIES AFTER STALIN By Brandon Gray Miller The Soviet Union of the 1950s and 1960s existed in a transitional state, emerging recently from postwar reconstruction and on a path toward increasing urbanity, consumer provisioning, and technological might. Modernizing rhetoric emphasized not only these spatial and material transformations, but also the promise of full-fledged communism’s looming arrival. This transformational ethos necessitated a renewal of direct attempts to remold humanity. Gender equality—or, at the very least, removing bourgeois strictures on women—remained a partially unfulfilled promise. Technological advances and the development of Soviet industrial capacity offered a new means of profoundly altering the lives of Soviet men and women. As other scholars have noted, Soviet women were the most obvious targets of these campaigns, but they were not alone in these projects. This dissertation argues that the Soviet state also directed intensive campaigns to remodel male consumptive and bodily practices in order to rid them of politically and socially destructive tendencies, making them fit for the modern socialist civilization under construction. Rooted in, but divergent from, Bolshevik novyi byt campaigns and Stalinist kul’turnost efforts, Soviet authorities actively sought to craft productive male citizens of a modern mold freed of the rough and coarse habits associated with working-class and village masculinities. Many of men targeted in these campaigns fell short of these stated aims.
    [Show full text]
  • Re-Thinking U.S.-Soviet Relations in 1956: Nikita Khrushchev's Secret Speech, the Poznán Revolt, the Return of Władysław Gomułka, and the Hungarian Revolt
    Trinity College Trinity College Digital Repository Senior Theses and Projects Student Scholarship Spring 2014 Re-Thinking U.S.-Soviet Relations in 1956: Nikita Khrushchev's Secret Speech, the Poznán Revolt, the Return of Władysław Gomułka, and the Hungarian Revolt Emily Parsons Trinity College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalrepository.trincoll.edu/theses Part of the Diplomatic History Commons, Political History Commons, and the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Parsons, Emily, "Re-Thinking U.S.-Soviet Relations in 1956: Nikita Khrushchev's Secret Speech, the Poznán Revolt, the Return of Władysław Gomułka, and the Hungarian Revolt". Senior Theses, Trinity College, Hartford, CT 2014. Trinity College Digital Repository, https://digitalrepository.trincoll.edu/theses/365 1 Re-Thinking U.S.-Soviet Relations in 1956: Nikita Khrushchev’s Secret Speech, the Poznań Revolt, the Return of Władysław Gomułka, and the Hungarian Revolt Emily Parsons History Department Senior Thesis Advisor: Samuel Kassow Trinity College 2013-2014 2 Table of Contents: Acknowledgements 3 Introduction 4 Part One: The Chronology of the Events of the Cold War in 1956 12 Chapter 1: Do As I Say Not As I Do: Nikita Khrushchev’s Secret Speech 13 Chapter 2: The Eastern Bloc Begins to Crack: Poznań Revolt and Polish October 21 Chapter 3: Khrushchev Goes Back on His Word: The Hungarian Revolt of 1956 39 Part Two: The United States Reactions and Understanding of the Events of 1956 60 Chapter 4: Can Someone Please Turn on the Lights? It’s Dark in Here: United States Reactions to the Khrushchev’s Secret Speech 61 Chapter 5: “When They Begin to Crack, They Can Crack Fast.
    [Show full text]
  • Brezhnev's War on Crime: the Criminal in Soviet Society, 1963-1984
    Brezhnev's War on Crime: The Criminal in Soviet Society, 1963-1984 By Rhiannon Lee Dowling A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Victoria Frede, co-chair Professor Yuri Slezkine, co-chair Professor Eric Naiman Spring 2017 Abstract Brezhnev's War on Crime: The Criminal in Soviet Society, 1963-1984 by Rhiannon Lee Dowling Doctor of Philosophy in History University of California, Berkeley Professor Victoria Frede, Co-chair Professor Yuri Slezkine, Co-chair One of the most important questions concerning Soviet history is: how did the period widely known as the era of “stagnation” lead to the very opposite of stagnation, indeed to the most sudden and cataclysmic changes in the region since the Russian Revolution? Was the Brezhnev era (1964-1982) simply the calm before the storm, or was it in fact the culmination of a tempest that had been brewing for decades? I argue that it was during “stagnation,” when many citizens learned to articulate their frustrations with Soviet society and formulate demands and solutions. Those solutions drew heavily from images, ideas and promises made by agents of the Soviet state. By taking a closer look at the Brezhnev era, we can see that it was in fact the legitimacy of the state's claims, and the seriousness with which people took them in this period, that actually helped to precipitate its downfall. Nothing brings this to light better than a focus on crime.
    [Show full text]
  • A Historical Analysis of the Films of Andrei Tarkovsky in Relation to the Post-Thaw Soviet Moment
    A Historical Analysis of the Films of Andrei Tarkovsky in Relation to the Post-Thaw Soviet Moment Gus Helbock Haverford College Class of 2017 History Thesis Professor Linda Gerstein Professor James Krippner April 21, 2017 Helbock i Acknowledgements First, I would like to thank the professors at Haverford College who guided me through my educational experience, especially in the History Department. Specifically, I am grateful for the help that Professor Linda Gerstein and Professor James Krippner provided as my first reader/advisor and second reader, respectively. The advice they gave me and the historical insight they provided were integral in the completion of this thesis. I would also like to thank my family and friends who have given me love and support throughout the entirety of the thesis process. Helbock ii Abstract During the latter half of the twentieth century, Andrei Tarkovsky received arguably more critical admiration for his films than any Soviet director. During his filmmaking career, the Soviet Union experienced a tumultuous socio-cultural, as well as political, moment. After the death of Stalin, the Khrushchev Thaw of the late 1950s and early 1960s allowed for significantly more freedom of expression. It was at this time that Tarkovsky’s career began. However, through the 1960s and 1970s, a reactionary period in Soviet politics led to a return of stringent censorship, making Tarkovsky’s filmmaking process difficult. In the early 1980s, Tarkovsky emigrated to Western Europe, where he completed his final two films before his death in 1986. Due to his contentious relationship with the Soviet state, this thesis will attempt to analyze Tarkovsky and assess his relationship to the Russian intelligentsia and the dissident movements of the late twentieth century, as well as his relationship with spirituality and religion.
    [Show full text]
  • The People's Phenomenon: "Author's Song" in Khrushchev's Soviet Union
    Constructing the Past Volume 13 Issue 1 Article 6 2012 The People's Phenomenon: "Author's Song" in Khrushchev's Soviet Union Sarah K. Moir Illinois Wesleyan University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.iwu.edu/constructing Recommended Citation Moir, Sarah K. (2012) "The People's Phenomenon: "Author's Song" in Khrushchev's Soviet Union," Constructing the Past: Vol. 13 : Iss. 1 , Article 6. Available at: https://digitalcommons.iwu.edu/constructing/vol13/iss1/6 This Article is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by Digital Commons @ IWU with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this material in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/ or on the work itself. This material has been accepted for inclusion by editorial board of the Undergraduate Economic Review and the Economics Department at Illinois Wesleyan University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ©Copyright is owned by the author of this document. The People's Phenomenon: "Author's Song" in Khrushchev's Soviet Union Abstract A massive shift from the Socialist Realism that predominated under Joseph Stalin, the bard culture that arose during Nikita Khrushchev's "Thaw" was fostered by the illegal underground transmission of tapes known as “magnitizdat”. Three well-known faces, with even better known voices, led this movement: Vladimir Vysotsky, Bulat Okudzhava, and Alexander Galich.
    [Show full text]
  • Cheburashka and Friends: the Rootless Cosmopolitan As Ideal Soviet Citizen
    Cheburashka and Friends: The Rootless Cosmopolitan as Ideal Soviet Citizen 1 Allison Murphy Undergraduate Honors Thesis Department of History University of Colorado Boulder Defense Date October 22nd, 2019 in partial fulfillment of the requirements for honors in History Committee Members: Primary Advisor: David Shneer, Department of History, Jewish Studies, Religious Studies Secondary Advisor: Vicki Grove, Department of German and Slavic Languages and Literature Honors Representative: Myles Osborne, Department of History 1 Crocodile Gena (Krokodil Gena). Dir Roman Kachanov. Soyuzmultfilm, 1969. Accessed ​ ​ ​ ​ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0Xrr9mcdFvw Murphy 1 Table of Contents Introduction Who Is Cheburashka?..........................................................................................................2 Historiography……….........................................................................................................4 Context and Methodology....................................................................................................7 Films Crocodile Gena (1969)......................................................................................................13 ​ Cheburashka (1971)..........................................................................................................29 ​ Shapoklyak (1974).............................................................................................................37 ​ Cheburashka Goes to School (1983).................................................................................46
    [Show full text]
  • To the New Shore: Soviet Architecture's Journey from Classicism to Standardization Katherine Zubovich-Eady Summer 2013 Katheri
    To the New Shore: Soviet Architecture’s Journey from Classicism to Standardization Katherine Zubovich-Eady Summer 2013 Katherine Zubovich-Eady is a PhD Candidate in the Department of History at the University of California, Berkeley. Acknowledgements I would like to thank Professor Yuri Slezkine and the participants in his Fall 2011 Soviet History research paper class for their comments on earlier versions of this essay. I would also like to thank Professor Andrew Shanken, whose generous comments on my essay graphic design in Arkhitektura SSSR have made their way into this paper. Figure 1: “K novomu beregu,” Arkhitektura SSSR, November 1955. To the New Shore: Soviet Architecture’s Journey from Classicism to Standardization In November 1955, the leading Soviet architects’ journal, Arkhitektura SSSR, featured a “friendly cartoon” (druzheskii sharzh) satirizing the uncertain state of the architectural profession (Fig. 1). Titled “To the New Shore,” this image showed the greats of Soviet architecture as they prepared to embark on a journey away from the errors of their past work. “After a lengthy and expensive stay on the island of excesses,” the cartoonists explained in their narrative printed alongside the image, “the architectural flotilla is preparing itself, at last, to depart for the long- awaited shore of standardization and industrialization in construction.”1 At the lower right of the cartoon, three of the architects of Moscow’s vysotnye zdaniia say goodbye “from the bottom of their hearts to their excesses (izlishestva),”2 which they have been prohibited from taking on board. Other key figures of Stalinist architecture are guided toward the vessel by their younger colleague, and most vocal critic, Georgii Gradov.
    [Show full text]
  • The Jewish Topic in the Soviet Media: Political Environment, Priorities and Heroes
    National Resilience, Politics and Society Volume 1, No. 2, Fall 2019, pp. 143-177 DOI: https://doi.org/10.26351/NRPS/1-2/2 ISSN: 2706-7645 (print); 2706-7653 (online) The Jewish Topic in the Soviet Media: Political Environment, Priorities and Heroes Dmitry Strovsky Abstract This article examines the evolution of the Soviet media in relation to the “Jewish topic”, which has become an integral part, albeit not very visible, of their common content. In the Soviet years, the subject of Jewishness was limited to connotations and never came to the fore. Nonetheless, it did exist in the Soviet media, albeit subtly, and often acquired hidden outlines. The main attention in the article is therefore paid to the stuff which for a few decades centered on situations that in one way or another involved Jewish circumstances, as well as to names of journalists of Jewish origin, who worked in the media and greatly influenced public consciousness during different periods of national history. The author envisages processes and events of Soviet life that affected the above topic, and predetermined the professional priorities of Soviet journalists. These occurrences affected the evolution of the entire media process in the country. Consequently, the article promotes strictly academic generalizations, and contains elements of essays that are very important for reconstruction of real situations in certain periods of Soviet history. In the meantime, the article serves as a well-structured representation of diverse empirical material being useful for studies in political science, sociology, media history, as well as other humanities. Keywords: Communist ideology, Soviet propaganda, Israel, “Jewish issue” in the USSR, anti-Semitism, “rootless cosmopolitanism”, media, samizdat Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Experience of Ukraine in Soviet Times
    Pokhilko, O., Ivanova, I., Martynenko, D. / Volume 9 - Issue 32: 70-80 / August, 2020 70 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.34069/AI/2020.32.08.8 National Identity Formation under Statelessness: Experience of Ukraine in Soviet Times Формування національної ідентичності в умовах бездержавності: досвід України в радянський період Received: June 15, 2020 Accepted: August 21, 2020 Written by: Olena Pokhilko28 https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1247-146X Iryna Ivanova29 https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9873-1677 Daria Martynenko30 https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5123-6473 Abstract Аннотация The issue of national identity is multifaceted, Вопрос национальной идентичности является disputable and extremely important in modern многогранным, дискуссионным и society, being one of the factors that determine its чрезвычайно важным в современном vitality. This paper presents the look at the problem обществе, являясь одним из факторов, from pedagogical perspective. The authors aim to определяющих его жизнеспособность. В explore the peculiarities of the formation of данной работе представлен взгляд на Ukrainian national identity in native intelligentsia проблему с педагогической точки зрения. under Ukrainian statelessness in Soviet times using Авторы имеют целью исследовать the life and activity of Yurii Stupak as an example. особенности формирования украинской Yurii Stupak is a notable representative of национальной идентичности отечественной Ukrainian intelligentsia, an educator, scholar, интеллигенции в условиях literary studies expert, art critic, local history бесгосударственности советского времени, researcher, the author of numerous works in на примере жизни и деятельности Юрия history of education and ethno-pedagogy. The Ступака. Юрий Ступак – выдающийся study uses qualitative methodology and is founded представитель украинской интеллигенции, on the laws and categories of scientific research.
    [Show full text]
  • Year 11 Bridging Work for History a Level the Crisis of Communism
    Complete Read Listen Soviet Union, 1922-1953 Nuclear Fallout The Berlin Blockade Complete a detailed and In 1945, the USSR was an ally In 1948 Stalin blockaded Berlin, a informative timeline of the of the west in the fight against city divided into East (under Soviet Soviet Union from 1922-1953. Nazi Germany. But a mere 17 control) and West (under Information you could include: profiles of the years later the two sides stood poised to British/American/French control). Would Britain leaders of the USSR, political, economic and obliterate each other in a nuclear apocalypse. and America do anything to help the Berliners, or industrial developments (e.g. the Great Purge, David Reynolds describes how a relationship would they give up West Berlin to the Soviets? Year 11 Bridging Work for the Holodomor), key dates (political turned ugly. Bridget Kendall hears from three Berliners about History A Level appointments, deaths etc.). Extension- extend Link: History Extra life under the blockade. The Crisis of Communism: The USSR and the your timeline to 1991. You may wish to start Time: 15 minutes Link: BBC History Soviet Empire 1953-2000 with Wikipedia. Time: 15 minutes Link: Wikipedia Week 3 and 4 Time: 3 hours Listen Read Watch Complete Chernobyl with Julie McDowall The Cuban Missile Crisis The Khrushchev Thaw The Eastern Bloc The Chernobyl disaster was a nuclear The Cuban Missile Crisis, a tense In the second half of the Create a map of the Eastern Bloc – accident near the town of Pripyat, 13-day standoff between the US 1950s, an attempt was made in the USSR and the seven Soviet Ukraine in 1986.
    [Show full text]
  • Sedition : Everyday Resistance in the Soviet Union Under Khrushchev and Brezhnev / Edited by Vladimir A
    annals of communism Each volume in the series Annals of Communism will publish selected and previ- ously inaccessible documents from former Soviet state and party archives in a nar- rative that develops a particular topic in the history of Soviet and international communism. Separate English and Russian editions will be prepared. Russian and Western scholars work together to prepare the documents for each volume. Doc- uments are chosen not for their support of any single interpretation but for their particular historical importance or their general value in deepening understanding and facilitating discussion. The volumes are designed to be useful to students, scholars, and interested general readers. executive editor of the annals of communism series Jonathan Brent, Yale University Press project manager Vadim A. Staklo american advisory committee Ivo Banac, Yale University Robert L. Jackson, Yale University Zbigniew Brzezinski, Center for Norman Naimark, Stanford Univer- Strategic and International Studies sity William Chase, University of Pittsburgh Gen. William Odom (deceased), Hud- Friedrich I. Firsov, former head of the son Institute and Yale University Comintern research group at Daniel Orlovsky, Southern Methodist RGASPI University Sheila Fitzpatrick, University of Timothy Snyder, Yale University Chicago Mark Steinberg, University of Illinois, Gregory Freeze, Brandeis University Urbana-Champaign John L. Gaddis, Yale University Strobe Talbott, Brookings Institution J. Arch Getty, University of California, Mark Von Hagen, Arizona State Uni- Los Angeles versity Jonathan Haslam, Cambridge Univer- Piotr Wandycz, Yale University sity russian advisory committee K. M. Anderson, Moscow State Uni- S. V. Mironenko, director, State versity Archive of the Russian Federation N. N. Bolkhovitinov, Russian Acad- (GARF) emy of Sciences O.
    [Show full text]