DOCSLIB.ORG

17-027-04-Bergamt Und BSH Stellungnahme Nordstream II

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
17-027-04-Bergamt Und BSH Stellungnahme Nordstream II Bergamt Stralsund Frankendamm 17 18439 Stralsund Per fax: 03831 612112 03831 612116 Per email: [email protected] [email protected] Wednesday, 31 May 2017 cc: Bundesamt für Seeschifffahrt und Hydrografie BSH Bernhard−Nocht−Strasse 78 20359 Hamburg Per fax: 040 31905000 Per email: [email protected] Nord Stream 2 - Natural gas pipeline through the Baltic Sea from Narva Bay (Russia) to Lubmin (Germany) Planning approval procedure in accordance with Section 43(2) of the German Energy Industry Law for installation and operation in German coastal waters, including landfall Approval procedure in accordance with Section 133(1)(2) of the German Federal Mining Law for installation and operation on the German continental shelf region Espoo procedure for the transboundary environmental impact study Letter from the BSH dated 7.4.2017 to WWF Germany, Baltic Sea project office, Official announcement and display of the application documents by the Bergamt Stralsund (display period 18.4.2017 to 17.5.2017 inclusive) Our ref: 17-027 Nord Stream II – PK Dear Sir/Madam, I should like to notify you of the representations of the following institutions and associations in respect of the procedure cited as reference above: 1. WWF Germany, represented by the executive board member, Mr Eberhard Brandes, Reinhardtstrasse 18, 10117 Berlin 2. WWF−Baltic Sea Office, represented by Mr Jochen Lamp, Knieperwall 1, 18439 Stralsund 3. Bund für Umwelt und Naturschutz Deutschland (Friends of the Earth Germany), Landesverband Mecklenburg−Vorpommern e.V., represented by its chair, Prof. Dr. Mathias Grünwald, Wismarsche Strasse 152, 19053 Schwerin Proper authorisation has been confirmed in my capacity as an attorney, if necessary, I can supply powers of attorney. My clients hereby adopt the comments already submitted, or yet to be submitted after today, of each other as their own. The representations are simultaneously objection and statements as defined by the German Environmental Appeals act (UmwRG) (hereinafter: comments). My clients argue that the planning approval applied for contravenes statutory regulations which are intended to provide environmental protection and which are of significance for the decision, and further that the planning approval applied for also contravenes statutory regulations that are not intended to provide environmental protection and are of significance for the decision. Both the WWF as a foundation and Friends of the Earth Germany, being a recognised nature conservation association, claim to be affected by the decision requested in respect of their statutory remit of promoting the objectives of environmental protection. My clients also reserve the right to make further or supplementary arguments after the expiry of the time limit for public participation. I should like to expand on the comments made by my clients as follows: 1. Absence of specification and assurance of compensation measures The landscape management plan for the route section in the coastal waters of Mecklenburg−Western Pomerania and in the area of the landfall at Lubmin from March 2017 contains on page 286 the following passage with respect to the compensation measures: All sets of measures have been assessed together with the nature conservancy authorities responsible in each case with regard to their suitabilty for the implementation of compensating substitution measures in accordance with Section 15, paragraph 2 of the German Federal Nature Protection Law. Further specification of the sets of measures in respect of their availability under civil law will show which sets of measures or partial sets of measures can be specifically established as compensation measure in the planning approval. It is clear from this passage that it has not been determined at the current time which sets of measures are to be implemented and then specifically to be laid down in the planning approval as compensation measures. An approach of this kind is not permissible. Both the necessary compensation in accordance with Section 15 of the German Federal Nature Protection Law and the required coherence of compensatory measures according to Section 34(5) of the German Federal Nature Protection Law in the area of the habitat protection and any necessary definition of equalising measures brought forward as a consequence of nature protection legislation as determined in the third sentence of Section 44(5) of the German Federal Nature Protection Law and, where necessary, measures in measures programmes in accordance with Section 82 of the German Water Resources Law must be components of the planning application (hereinafter known consistently in the context described as: compensation measures). The planning application decision must conclusively determine which compensation measures have been defined and what these compensation measures are intended to compensate for. The selection and attribution of the compensation measures must be made clear in the application documents. Subsequent definition of the compensation measures is not permissible for a number of reasons. On the one hand, keeping the definition of compensation measures from a selection listed in the application document open is in breach of the public consultation requirements. As part of the consultation of the public and stakeholders, the public and the stakeholders must have the opportunity to express their views on the intended measures. Although this does not mean that further amendments are not permissible after the public consultation. It is, however, impermissible during the course of the public consultation to present only a sort of offer for selection that can then be firmed up after the public consultation by the authority without the public having the opportunity to have any influence on this during the course of the consultation. Since, in addition, the presentation of a selection list of this kind does not contain any information as to which measure is intended to compensate for what intervention or what effects, a qualified statement in this regard would also not even be possible, because the congruence between intervention or impact on the one hand and compensation measure on the other hand, must be established and investigated specifically for the intervention or impact concerned. The application documents as presented do not permit this. The presentation of a selection list of compensation measures yet to be concretely defined further breaches the requirements of Section 15(2) of the German Federal Nature Protection Law and against the requirements of the further compensation requirements of the specialist laws that have already been listed above. According to Section 15(4) of the German Federal Nature Protection Law compensation and substitution measures must be maintained and secured in law in the period required. In particular, legal assurance of the compensation measures must be in place at the time of the planning approval decision. To this extent it is not possible to make any statement at all regarding the legal backing of the compensation measures for the areas the availability of which has not yet been resolved (see landscape management plan, page 286). Thus the selection of the compensation measures does not only depend on the later decision by the authority, but also from external factors which have not yet been clarified at the time of the public consultation. The compensation concept presented thus is in breach of the legal requirements as a whole. If the development proposal is maintained, it is necessary first to specify which interventions or impacts are to be compensated for by which measure. Then it is necessary to specify whether the compensation measures to be stipulated accordingly are actually available. Further, it must be stated precisely what impact and which intervention is to be compensated for by which measure and which safeguards and supporting measures are provided for this. A compensation concept of this kind shall then be re-presented for public consultation. Should the planning approval order result in the absence of corresponding consultation of the public, it would be unlawful because of the breach of public consultation and would fall victim to revocation or at the least non-enforceability in court proceedings. 2. Impermissible reference to the renaturing of the Ossenniederung My clients' representations point out that an already planned and partially completed renaturing measure (reflooding of the Ossenniederung) has been impermissibly recognised as a compensation measure. This is not permissible. The approved measure is not a compensation measure for the project presented here. Were it to be permissible to define any measure that enhances nature retrospectively as a compensation measure for a future intervention, this would mean that it would be sufficient in order to balance out the impact of an intervention, and also in respect of the assessment of compatibility with regard to habitat conservation legislation, to go searching for a measure that has a positive impact on nature, and then to declare this the compensation measure. Apart from this, a procedure of this nature would contradict the basic concept of compensation. Compensation is about balancing out an intervention in nature and the landscape proposed for the future by correspondingly enhancing measures at the same or a different place. Compensation of this kind necessarily requires that corresponding measures enhancing nature are bound to the development proposal itself. Reference back to approved
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Nord Stream 2 Submits Revised Compensation Concept
    Press release Nord Stream 2 submits revised compensation concept > Compensation concept requires significantly less space > Compensation measures “Wreecher See“ and “Mellnitz-Üselitzer Wiek“ cancelled > Investments in sewage treatment plants Bergen, Göhren, Stralsund and Greifswald [Stralsund, Germany – 7 November 2017] Nord Stream 2 AG has submitted a revised compensation concept to the Stralsund Mining Authority, the authority responsible for carrying out the permitting procedure and issuing the permit for the route of the Nord Stream 2 Pipeline in German coastal waters. The adapted concept is the result of an intensive and constructive dialogue between all parties, and takes into account the evaluation of the statements as well as the results of the public consultation. “We have reviewed many alternative compensation measures and identified those which will significantly reduce the land use requirements on the Island of Rügen. We have kept our word and found a consensual solution in the interest of the farmers and the environment“, says Jens Lange, Permitting Manager Germany, Nord Stream 2 AG. The compensation measures “Wreecher See” and “Mellnitz-Üselitzer Wiek” are no longer part of the new concept. Regarding the measures “Ossen” and “Lobber See”, the spatial requirements were reduced and only discretionary and suitable areas were taken into account. Instead of the 250 hectares of arable land with a land value below 50 that were originally discussed, only about 70 hectares of arable land on the Island of Rügen will be converted into semi- natural meadows and pastures. A viable management plan is part of this compensation measure. The aim of the compensation concept is still to reduce the discharge of nutrients, particularly nitrogen, into the waters of the Rügische Bodden.
    [Show full text]
  • Home Port of the Romantic
    University- and Hanseatic Town of Home Port of the Romantic greifswald.info The Centre-Piece Merchants’ Houses The market square is the heart of Greifswald’s historic Old Town. Just like in past days, the town’s and Brick Gothic ‘front room’ is still the meeting place for chatting, gossip and shopping. The most beautiful façades on the market square more than certainly belong to the Town Hall and the two brick Gothic gabled Markt 11 houses Markt 11 and Markt 13. The Historic Book your guided tour Being old merchants’ houses, of the Old Town here: Old Town they remind us of the previ- +49 3834 8536 1380 St. Marien ous wealth of the Hanseatic traders and, together with seven further buildings, belong to the European Route of Brick Gothic. On a walk through the streets of the Old Town, visitors can discover the witnesses of the medieval past. Built in the middle of the 13th Century, the spires of the three churches, St. Nikolai, St. Marien and St. Jacobi can be seen from far afield. The Old Town is surrounded by the remnants of the town wall. Built back then to protect the town from attacks, the former ramparts are today the perfect venue for drawn-out walks. Nicholas, Marie & Jacob Market Square Lovingly known by Greifswald’s citizens as ‘long Nicholas’, ‘fat Marie’ and ‘little Jacob’, the three redbrick churches shape the face of the historic Old town. As the church in which Caspar David Friedrich was baptised, and the place in which the University was founded, the cathedral St.
    [Show full text]
  • Bestandsaufnahme U. Bewertung Von Habitaten 2017 ... Boddengewässer
    Verbundprojekt Schatz an der Küste Bestandsaufnahme und Bewertung von Habitaten und Wassernutzun- gen sowie räumliche Zonierungsempfehlungen zur Entwicklung einer Befahrensempfehlung für die Boddengewässer im Hotspot 29 Gefördert durch das Bundesamt für Naturschutz mit Mitteln des Bundesministeriums für Umwelt, Naturschutz, Bau und Reaktorsicherheit. Diese Potenzialanalyse gibt die Auffassung und Meinung des Zuwendungsempfängers des Bundesprogramms wieder und muss nicht mit der Auffassung des Zuwendungsgebers übereinstimmen. Weitere Förderer: WWF Deutschland Projektbüro Ostsee Regionalplanung Verbundprojekt Schatz an der Küste Umweltplanung Bestandsaufnahme und Bewertung von Habitaten und Wassernutzungen sowie räumliche Zonierungs- Landschaftsarchitektur empfehlungen zur Entwicklung einer Befahrensempfehlung für die Boddengewässer im Hotspot 29 Landschaftsökologie Wasserbau Immissionsschutz Hydrogeologie Projekt-Nr.: 25427-00 Fertigstellung: November 2017 UmweltPlan GmbH Stralsund [email protected] www.umweltplan.de Hauptsitz Stralsund Postanschrift: Tribseer Damm 2 Geschäftsführerin: Dipl.-Geogr. Synke Ahlmeyer 18437 Stralsund Tel. +49 3831 6108-0 Fax +49 3831 6108-49 Niederlassung Rostock Majakowskistraße 58 18059 Rostock Tel. +49 381 877161-50 Außenstelle Greifswald Projektleiter: Dipl.-Landschaftsökol. Bahnhofstraße 43 Kristina Vogelsang 17489 Greifswald Tel. +49 3834 23111-91 Geschäftsführerin Mitarbeit: Dipl.-Biol. Dr. Jan Prinz Dipl.-Geogr. Synke Ahlmeyer Dipl.-Geogr. Ulrike Kerstan Zertifikate Dipl.-Kartogr. Ulrike Assmann Qualitätsmanagement
    [Show full text]
  • Polish Yearbook of International Law Vol. XVIII/1989-1990
    POLISH YEARBOOK OF INTERNATIONAL LAW XVIII ACADEMIE POLONAISE DES SCIENCES INSTITUT DES SCIENCES JURIDIQUES ANNUAIRE POLONAIS DE DROIT INTERNATIONAL XVIII 1989— 1990 OSSOLINEUM MAISON D’EDITION DE L’ACADEMIE POLONAISE DES SCIENCES Dr. Władysław Czapliński ul. Widawska 7/36 01-494 Warszawa POLISH ACADEMY OF SCIENCES INSTITUTE OF LAW STUDIES POLISH YEARBOOK OF INTERNATIONAL LAW XVIII 1989— 1990 WROCŁAW-WARSZAWA-KRAKÓW ZAKŁAD NARODOWY IMIENIA OSSOLIŃSKICH WYDAWNICTWO POLSKIEJ AKADEMII NAUK 1992 EDITORIAL COMMITTEE * COMITE DE REDACTION Lech Antonowicz, Remigiusz Bierzanek, Wojciech Góralczyk, Roman Jasica, Jerzy Kranz, Manfred Lachs, Jerzy Makarczyk, Janusz Mic- kiewicz, Stanisław E. Nahlik, Jerzy Rajski, Krzysztof Skubiszewski, Janusz Symonides, Andrzej Wasilkowski, Karol Wolike EDITORIAL BOARD • REDACTION Andrzej Wasilkowski (Editor-in-Chief) Jerzy Rajski (Deputy Editor-in-Chief) Renata Szafarz (Deputy Editor-in-Chief) Address of the Editorial Board • Adresse de la Rédaction Institute of Law Studies, Polish Academy of Sciences, Nowy Świat 72, 00-330 Warszawa The typescript of the current issue was handed to the Publisher in December 1989. Contents * Table des matières Articles WŁADYSŁAW CZAPLIŃSKI, The Polish-East German Dispute on the Delimitation of Maritime Areas in the Bay of Pomerania an Appraisal 7 GENOWEFA M. GRABOWSKA, Les avis consultatifs— de la Cour Internationale de Justice 17 RUDOLF OSTRIHANSKY, The “ Mazilu Opinion” of the International Court of Justice and Its Contribution to Clarification of International Law 31 ANNA PRZYBOROWSKA-KLIMCZAK,
    [Show full text]
  • In Pomerania Bay, Gdansk Bay and Curonian Lagoon
    Journal of Elementology ISSN 1644-2296 Pilarczyk B., Pilecka-Rapacz M., Tomza-Marciniak A., Domagała J., Bąkowska M., Pilarczyk R. 2015. Selenium content in European smelt (Osmerus eperlanus eperlanus L.) in Pomerania Bay, Gdansk Bay and Curonian Lagoon. J. Elem., 20(4): 957-964. DOI: 10.5601/jelem.2015.20.1.876 SELENIUM CONTENT IN EUROPEAN SMELT (OSMERUS EPERLANUS EPERLANUS L.) IN POMERANIA BAY, GDANSK BAY AND CURONIAN LAGOON Bogumiła Pilarczyk1, Małgorzata Pilecka-Rapacz2, Agnieszka Tomza-Marciniak1, Józef Domagała2, Małgorzata Bąkowska1, Renata Pilarczyk3 1Chair of Animal Reproduction Biotechnology and Environmental Hygiene West Pomeranian University of Technology in Szczecin 2 Chair of General Zoology University of Szczecin 3Laboratory of Biostatistics West Pomeranian University of Technology in Szczecin Abstract Migratory smelt (Osmerus eperlanus eperlanus L.) may be perceived as a valuable indicative organism in monitoring the current environmental status and in assessment of a potential risk caused by selenium pollution. The aim of the study was to compare the selenium content in the European smelt from the Bay of Pomerania, Gdansk, and the Curonian Lagoon. The experimen- tal material consisted of smelt samples (muscle) caught in the bays of Gdansk and Pomerania and the Curonian Lagoon (estuaries of the three largest rivers in the Baltic Sea basin: the Oder, the Vistula and the Neman). A total of 133 smelt were examined (Pomerania Bay n = 67; Gdansk Bay n = 35; Curonian Lagoon n = 31). Selenium concentrations were determined spec- trofluorometrically. The data were analyzed statistically using one-way analysis of variance, calculated in Statistica PL software. The region of fish collection significantly affected the content of selenium in the examined smelts.
    [Show full text]
  • Oil Pollution in the Baltic Sea the Handbook of Environmental Chemistry
    The Handbook of Environmental Chemistry 27 Series Editors: Damià Barceló · Andrey G. Kostianoy Andrey G. Kostianoy Olga Yu. Lavrova Editors Oil Pollution in the Baltic Sea The Handbook of Environmental Chemistry Founded by Otto Hutzinger Editors-in-Chief: Damia` Barcelo´ l Andrey G. Kostianoy Volume 27 Advisory Board: Jacob de Boer, Philippe Garrigues, Ji-Dong Gu, Kevin C. Jones, Thomas P. Knepper, Alice Newton, Donald L. Sparks The Handbook of Environmental Chemistry Recently Published and Forthcoming Volumes Oil Pollution in the Baltic Sea Global Risk-Based Management of Volume Editors: A.G. Kostianoy Chemical Additives I: Production, and O.Yu. Lavrova Usage and Environmental Occurrence Vol. 27, 2014 Volume Editors: B. Bilitewski, R.M. Darbra, and D. Barcelo´ Urban Air Quality in Europe Vol. 18, 2012 Volume Editor: M. Viana Vol. 26, 2013 Polyfluorinated Chemicals and Transformation Products Climate Change and Water Resources Volume Editors: T.P. Knepper Volume Editors: T. Younos and C.A. Grady and F.T. Lange Vol. 25, 2013 Vol. 17, 2012 Emerging Organic Contaminants in Brominated Flame Retardants Sludges: Analysis, Fate and Biological Volume Editors: E. Eljarrat and D. Barcelo´ Treatment Vol. 16, 2011 Volume Editors: T. Vicent, G. Caminal, E. Eljarrat, and D. Barcelo´ Effect-Directed Analysis of Complex Vol. 24, 2013 Environmental Contamination Volume Editor: W. Brack Global Risk-Based Management of Vol. 15, 2011 Chemical Additives II: Risk-Based Assessment and Management Strategies Waste Water Treatment and Reuse Volume Editors: B. Bilitewski, R.M. Darbra, in the Mediterranean Region and D. Barcelo´ Volume Editors: D. Barcelo´ and M. Petrovic Vol. 23, 2013 Vol.
    [Show full text]
  • Gewässergütebericht 2003 / 2004 / 2005 / 2006 Gewässergütebericht 2003 / 2004 2005 2006 Gewässergütebericht
    Gewässergütebericht 2003 / 2004 / 2005 / 2006 Gewässergütebericht 2003 / 2004 2005 2006 Gewässergütebericht Ergebnisse der Güteüberwachung der Fließ-, Stand- und Küstengewässer und des Grundwassers in Mecklenburg-Vorpommern Mecklenburg Vorpommern Mecklenburg-Vorpommern Landesamt für Umwelt, Naturschutz und Geologie Impressum Herausgeber: Landesamt für Umwelt, Naturschutz und Geologie Mecklenburg-Vorpommern Goldberger Straße 12, 18273 Güstrow Telefon 03843 - 777-0, Fax 03843 - 777-106 http://www.lung.mv-regierung.de, email: [email protected] Erarbeitet von: Bachor, Dr. Alexander; Federführung Kapitel 3 und 5 sowie Redaktion Carstens, Dr. Marina; Federführung Kapitel 3 Klitzsch, Stefan; Federführung Kapitel 2 Korczynski, Ilona Lemke, Gabriele; Federführung Kapitel 6 Mathes, Dr. Jürgen; Federführung Kapitel 4 Müller, Jörg Schenk, Marianne Seefeldt, Olaf; Federführung Kapitel 1 Schöppe, Christine Schumann, André Tonn, Bärbel Weber, Mario von; Federführung Kapitel 5 Der Gewässergütebericht 2003/2004/2005/2006 ist ein Gemeinschaftsprodukt der Abteilung Wasser und Boden des Landesamtes für Umwelt, Naturschutz und Geologie und des Seenreferates des Ministeriums für Landwirtschaft, Umwelt und Verbraucherschutz in Zusammenarbeit mit dem Gewässerkund- lichen Landesdienst der Staatlichen Ämter für Umwelt und Natur. Zu zitieren als: Gewässergütebericht Mecklenburg-Vorpommern 2003/2004/2005/2006: Ergebnisse der Güteüberwachung der Fließ-, Stand- und Küstengewässer und des Grundwassers in Mecklenburg-Vorpommern, Herausgeber: Landesamt
    [Show full text]
  • Extreme Sea Levels at Selected Stations on the Baltic Sea Coast*
    doi:10.5697/oc.56-2.259 Extreme sea levels at OCEANOLOGIA, 56 (2), 2014. selected stations on the pp. 259–290. C Copyright by Baltic Sea coast* Polish Academy of Sciences, Institute of Oceanology, 2014. KEYWORDS Baltic Sea Extreme sea levels Storm surges and falls Tomasz Wolski1,⋆, Bernard Wiśniewski2 Andrzej Giza1, Halina Kowalewska-Kalkowska1 Hanna Boman3, Silve Grabbi-Kaiv4 Thomas Hammarklint5, Jurgen¨ Holfort6 Zydruneˇ Lydeikaite˙ 7 1 University of Szczecin, Faculty of Geosciences, al. Wojska Polskiego 107/109, 70–483 Szczecin, Poland; e-mail: [email protected] ⋆corresponding author 2 Maritime University of Szczecin, Faculty of Navigation, Wały Chrobrego 1–2, 70–500 Szczecin, Poland 3 Finnish Meteorological Institute, Erik Palm´enin aukio 1, FI–00101 Helsinki, Finland 4 Estonian Meteorological and Hydrological Institute, Toompuiestee 24, 10149 Tallinn, Estonia 5 Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute, Sven K¨allfelts Gata 15, 42471 G¨oteborg, Sweden 6 Bundesamt f¨ur Seeschifffahrt und Hydrographie, Neptunallee 5, 18057 Rostock, Germany 7 Environmental Protection Agency, Taikos pr. 26, LT–91149, Klaipeda, Lithuania Received 25 October 2013, revised 6 February 2014, accepted 11 February 2014. * This work was financed by the Polish National Centre for Science research project No. 2011/01/B/ST10/06470. The complete text of the paper is available at http://www.iopan.gda.pl/oceanologia/ 260 T. Wolski, B. Wiśniewski, A. Giza et al. Abstract The purpose of this article is to analyse and describe the extreme characteristics of the water levels and illustrate them as the topography of the sea surface along the whole Baltic Sea coast. The general pattern is to show the maxima and minima of Baltic Sea water levels and the extent of their variations in the period from 1960 to 2010.
    [Show full text]
  • National Studies of the Law Applicable on the Continental Shelf and in the EEZ
    National Studies of the Law Applicable on the Continental Shelf and in the EEZ The Law Applicable on the Continental Shelf and in the Exclusive Economic Zone: The Polish Perspective Maria Dragun-Gertner and Zuzanna Peplowska Faculty of Law and Administration, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Toruń, Poland Dorota Pyć Faculty of Law and Administration, University of Gdańsk, Poland GENERAL/DESCRIPTIVE 1. Is your country a party to the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea? Poland is a party to the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS). The Polish Parliament agreed to the ratifi cation of the Convention and Agreement on Part XI on 2 July 1998.1 Consequently, the Convention and Agreement on Part XI was ratifi ed by the President and came into force in Poland on 13 December 1998.2 2. Is or was your country party to the 1958 Convention on the Continental Shelf ? 3. Did your country adopt legislation to implement the 1958 Convention (if a party)? Was this legislation amended after 1982? Poland is also a party to the 1958 Convention on the Continental Shelf, which was ratifi ed on 22 May 1962.3 On 17 December 1977, the Parliament of the Polish People’s Republic adopted the Act on the Continental Shelf of the Polish People’s Republic, which came into force on 1 January 1978.4 The Polish continental shelf 1. Statute with the agreement for the ratifi cation found in the Offi cial Journal of Laws of the Republic of Poland - Dz. U. 1998, No.
    [Show full text]
  • Handbuch Binnenschifffahrtsfunk 2006/1
    Ausgabe 2006/1 Handbuch 2006 Binnenschifffahrtsfunk Regionaler Teil Deutschland (ohne Rhein und Donau) Inhalt I. Allgemeines zum Nautischen Informationsfunk Seite 02 II. Rangfolge und Arten der Funkgespräche Seite 03 III. Tabellarische Übersicht ortsfester Funkstellen Seite 04 IV. Karten Seite 17 V. Seeschifffahrtsstraßen (Elbe und Nebenflüsse) Seite 27 VI. Empfohlene Redewendungen für die Fahrt Seite 37 VII. Anschriften Revierzentralen, Vehrkehrszentralen, Schleusen und Wasserschutzpolizeistationen Seite 40 VIII. Anhang Seite 81 IX. Stichwortverzeichnis Seite 87 I. Allgemeines zum Nautischen Informationsfunk Grundlagen mehreren Sprechstellen verbunden nenschiffahrts-Verlag GmbH, Damm- (Schleuse, Revierzentrale, Schiffs- straße 15/17, 47119 Duisburg Zweck zählstelle); deshalb bitte immer bezogen werden (Telefon: 0203/ gewünschte Sprechstelle nennen 800 06-20, Telefax: -21). Der Verkehrskreis “Nautische Infor- (z. B. "Iffezheim Schleuse" oder mation im Binnenschifffahrtsfunk” "Oberwesel Revierzentrale"). Die Bedienung einer Sprechfunk- dient der Übermittlung von Nach- anlage darf nur durch Personen richten, die sich auf dem Schutz Tafelzeichen mit Angabe der erfolgen, bzw. muss von Personen von Personen oder auf die Fahrt Funkkanäle beaufsichtigt werden, die über ein oder die Sicherheit von Schiffen UKW-Sprechfunkzeugnis für den beziehen. Tafelzeichen E.21 (UKW...) am Ufer Binnenschifffahrtsfunk verfügen. beachten. Für bestmöglichen Em- Gesprächspartner pfang beim Passieren der Tafeln auf Die Binnenschifffahrt-Sprechfunk- den jeweils benachbarten UKW- verordnung vom 18.12.02 regelt Revierzentrale / Schleuse <-> Kanal umschalten. An den stauge- Schiff regelten Wasserstraßen sind etwa - den UKW-Funkdienst an Bord von in der Mitte der Stauhaltungen Binnenschiffen (Einzelheiten im Wasserschutzpolizei <-> Schiff (nur Tafelzeichen E.21 mit der Aufschrift Handbuch "Binnenschifffahrts- im Verkehrsgebiet Niederrhein und der UKW-Kanäle der nächsten funk") und westdeutsche Kanäle südlich von Schleusen aufgestellt.
    [Show full text]
  • Referenzliste Landschaftsarchitektur
    Landschaftsarchitektur STÄDTEBAULICHE PLANUNG / DORFERNEUERUNGSPLANUNG Projekt Auftraggeber Jahr Hansestadt Rostock Freiflächenkonzept Ortsrand Warnemünde - West; Amt für Stadtentwicklung, 2016 Städtebauliches Konzept Stadtplanung und Wirtschaft „Unterwegs im Schreiadlerland“ – Ausschilderung von Besonderheiten Verein Backstein Geist und und Erarbeitung von Wegekarten und Informationspunkten in der 2014-2016 Garten e.V. Starkow Gemeinde Velgast Machbarkeitsstudie nördlicher Dänholm LEG 2013 Ideenskizze Wohngebiet Stralsund Hochschulallee LEG 2013 Spielraumentwicklungskonzept Stralsund Phase I Hansestadt Stralsund 2012 Fremdenverkehrsverband Routenkonzept „Pommersche Flusslandschaften“ 2010-2011 Vorpommern e. V. Entwicklungskonzept südliches Strelasundufer Hansestadt Stralsund 2005-2010 FREIRAUMPLANUNG / GARTENDENKMALPFLEGE / BAUÜBERWACHUNG Projekt Auftraggeber Jahr Konzeptionelle Planungen Biosphärenreservatsamt Erneuerung des Informationssystems – Erfassung und Dokumentation 2017 Südost-Rügen Vorplanung Kleiner Frankenteich – Projektgebiet 1 „Nordufer“ Hansestadt Stralsund seit 2016 Freiflächenentwicklungskonzept Ortsrand Warnemünde West Hansestadt Rostock 2016 Verein zum Schutz und Erhalt Nutzungskonzept Flugfeld Nisdorf des Kranichrastplatzes Rügen- 2013 Bockregion e.V. Konzeption zur Besucherlenkung für den Ivenacker Tiergarten animare project management 2013 Nutzungskonzept Waldhalle Sassnitz Nationalpark Jasmund 2013 Freizeitanlage an der Sundpromenade (Vorplanung) Hansestadt Stralsund 2012 Kloster Rühn (Denkmalpflegerische Zielstellung)
    [Show full text]
  • Russia's Outdated Construction Fleet in Nord Stream 2 May Lead to Catastrophe
    Received by NSD/FARA Registration Unit 04/16/2021 10:30:16 AM Translate » — COVID-19 in numbers: Ukraine Worldwide Cases: 1,921,244 Deaths: 39,096 Recovered: Cases: 139,860,708 Deaths: 3,002,788 Recovered: 1,465,820 118,916,354 Report: Russia's outdated construction fleet in Nord Stream 2 may lead to catastrophe By Alexander Query. Published April 2 at 4:48 pm * r- E2] The Russian pipe laying vessel Akademik Cherskiy is moored in the port of Mukran near Sassnitz on the Baltic Sea island of Ruegen in Germany, on Sept. 7, 2020, as it waits to continue work on the Nord Stream 2 natural gas pipeline. Russia's use of outdated vessels to build its controversial Nord Stream 2 pipeline could lead to a catastrophe, according to a report by Ukraine's Foreign Intelligence Service published on April 2. Photo by AFP Russia's use of outdated vessels to build its controversial Nord Stream 2 pipeline could lead Received by NSD/FARA Registration Unit 04/16/2021 10:30:16 AM Received by NSD/FARA Registration Unit 04/16/2021 10:30:16 AM to a catastrophe, according to a report by Ukraine's Foreign Intelligence Service published on April 2. Russia is forced to use its decaying fleet because economic sanctions against the project discouraged other participants. This creates an ecological disaster risk, the intelligence service stated. 'The use of technologically obsolete vessels and equipment in the future increases the likelihood of a man-made disaster with environmental consequences on a regional scale at any peak load," the report reads.
    [Show full text]