The Arab Revolt the Political Dimension

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Arab Revolt the Political Dimension The Arab Revolt The Political Dimension The Arab Revolt was an armed uprising in the second half of WW1 by the Hashemite Arabs of the Hejaz area of the Arabian Peninsular, led by Sheik Hussein bin Ali, Emir of Mecca and descendant of Mohammed the Prophet, and his four sons, against the Ottoman Turks who had occupied the area for over 400 years. Before and during the armed uprising, the political manifestations were beyond complex – they were a maelstrom of deals, promises, doubts, lies, deceit and agreements. The Hashemites were given early moral encouragement by certain Arabs of the Syrian area and finally military support by other tribal Arabs once the revolt started and successes were seen. British political concerns see-sawed, being seen by some as a lower priority than the France/Western Front theatre but vital by others. British military support of weapons and advisers followed and, although little known, Australia gave invaluable military and logistic support that arguably led to final victory in Palestine and the Arabs. The British officer Lt (later Lt-Col) T E Lawrence, who became known as Lawrence of Arabia, aided the revolt, acting as liaison officer between the British and the Arabs. Whilst the initial aim of the Arabs and Lawrence was for the unity of all Arabs and the formation of an Arab Nation, tribal disputes plus British and French post-war domination resulted in the establishment of Mandates in the Middle East and fragmented Arab control in scattered regions, laying the foundation for the Middle East as we see it today. The Arab Armies, tribal Arabs, British and Dominion forces all combined to defeat the Ottoman Turks. And whilst opinion is divided about the significance of the military impact of the Arab forces and the value of the eastern campaign of the Egyptian Expeditionary Force’s total contribution to World War 1, there is absolutely no argument about the impact it has had on the formation of today’s Middle East. Equally, there is no doubt that had the Revolt or the EEF campaign failed, the world would be a very different place than it is today. This paper looks at the political and global issues – a future paper will examine the military campaign. Mankind has occupied the Middle East for around 50,000 years. Arab culture in the desert provides hospitality to a visitor for three days without question. But that same culture allows five generations to effect retribution if a tribe or clan is dishonoured. The desert is a harsh landlord and life is cheap to those who have little and seek comfort from another. This is not Islamic culture, it is Arabic culture and their “law of the land” and their “land” is the desert. There are few friends and no cohesion between tribal peoples – only within the tribe and clans. It is important for peoples with different cultures to recognize this to understand the actions of the various Arab groups and those who came into contact with them. 1 To Start A Revolt At 53 years of age he was bearded and grey – he looked older … and tired. He sat alone by the window in his room in Mecca. Sweat dripped down his forehead, down his face and neck onto his chest as he sagged over the long barrelled rifle. A finger oscillated across the trigger. His thoughts were troubled - King or conquered? Was the sweat from the desert heat of mid-summer, or the realisation of what he was about to unleash? If he could have known the future, he would have sweated even more. With a deep breath and an effort to straighten his shoulders, Sheik Hussein bin Ali, Emir of Mecca as appointed by the Ottoman Sultan just eight years earlier, fired that rifle on the 5th June 1916 - an aging man with dreams of a unified Arab nation, himself as King of the Arabs, and much hope in his heart. That shot formally started the Arab Revolt; the uprising of the tribal Hejaz Arabs against the residual might of the 600 year old Ottoman Empire. His thoughts were troubled. Would the revolt gain widespread Arab support, or would the other tribes wait in dis-unity and watch before involving, if at all? Would Britain, already heavily defeated at Gallipoli and Mesopotamia and held to stalemate by the Germans in France, come to his aid, and even if it did, would it be of any value? The day he fired that shot, Hussein could not have known that Lord Kitchener, an early advocate of the eastern campaign and the Arab position, had been killed that same day when the ship he sailed on was sunk by a German mine. Background The Ottoman Empire at its peak (towards the end of the 17th Century) rivalled in size and influence the older dynasties of Rome, Greece, Egypt and Persia. From around 1300AD over the next six centuries it had grown from its hub in central Turkey to project like spokes of a wheel 360°; it went north through the Balkans into southern Europe including Greece, stopped only at the gates of Vienna; it went east surrounding the Black Sea into the southern areas of Russia, down the Mesopotamian rivers into Persia (Iran and Iraq today) to the Persian Gulf; south through the Arabian Peninsula to Yemen; then west through the top of Africa into Egypt, Algeria, Libya and Tunisia. The Ottomans controlled the Black Sea, The Aegean Sea, the Red Sea and much of the Mediterranean Sea – but the Suez Canal did not exist until the very end of their reign. In triumphant times, the Ottomans controlled the massive trade routes through the unique land areas that join Asia Minor to Europe at the Bosporus (Istanbul today); from Egypt through the Sinai into Palestine and then on to Mesopotamia and the Silk Routes to India and China. It was an Empire of controlled wealth and military strength. It was a palette of race, religion, culture, custom, skin colour, language, gastronomy, building, clothing and, love of the conqueror – for not all Rulers are loved unquestioningly. 2 map showing the extent of the Ottoman reach in its heyday Abdul-Hamid II had ascended to the Ottoman Sultan throne in 1876. His rule was punctuated with corruption, wild rantings, autocratic rulings, death-squad control of opposition and intolerance to contrary opinions. He was not loved. But during his reign the Ottoman Parliament had included Turks, Arabs, natives - Muslims, Christians and Jews. People of all religions could work, own business, vote and be part of the military. In cities and villages, people of all types lived side by side, mostly happily. Although the Sultan was corrupt and feared, the politics of his day had allowed Muslim, Jew and Christian to participate in the government, commerce and the military. During the 19th Century world politics had taken wild about-swings and new alliances replaced old ones and former enemies became friends and friends became enemies, as only politicians can achieve. Into the 20th century, the Ottoman Empire was an aging relic, at the twilight of its once dynamic reign. It was at the frontier of its final stages of decline and the seeds of internal revolt were formed by an enthusiastic group of what could be called ‘Turkish nationalists’, also known as the Young Turks of the Committee of Union and Progress [CUP]. They were forcing the Sultan to amend his corrupt and idiosyncratic ways that were leading the Empire to ruin. Under the Young Turks however, it was the Turkish members of the CUP who rose to prominence and positions of influence, while others were expelled or given much more minor roles1. The Sultan had his powers restricted by these Young Turks, who by 1909 finally deposed him in favour of his kindly but docile and obedient brother, Sultan Mehmed V who became the figurehead for the CUP. As the temples of Greece and Rome had collapsed from earthquakes, so this Empire was collapsing from the failure of leadership. By the outbreak of WW1 it was known as “the sick man of Europe”. It had lost expensive wars, was broke and its military disorganised and ill-equipped. The Balkans and Greece had gone back to the inhabitants. The French, Italians and British had taken Africa. The Russians had re- occupied their Black Sea coast. Britain had formed an alliance with Russia two decades before and Germany was the Empire’s new suitor, but hesitant to tell the Ottomans of its dream to create its own Empire into Asia Minor and Africa at the expense of the Ottomans. In the deserts the Arabs were stirring more revolt – the Hashemites were ready to revolt, the Rashids were ‘on-side’ with the Ottomans but the Indrissi and Sauds were not supportiveof either side. 3 The Empire was crumbling. The Hejaz Railway Despite his failings, Abdul-Hamid did have a bright spot. Except that it eventually became a favourite target of the Arab Revolt. He had ordered the building of the Hejaz Railway from Damascus to Mecca although it was only ever completed to Medina (the second holiest site in Islam) – this being done between late 1900 and 19082. Part of the reasoning for the railway was to enhance the Sultan’s prestige through his charitable donation of a more secure means for Muslims to complete their religious pilgrimage. The Hajj pilgrimage to Mecca3 became much easier, more affordable to the masses and less dangerous with three or four days on a train from Damascus, the new alternative to 40 days through a hostile desert with a paid-for Bedouin safari escort (itself subject to looting, murder and bribery by other Bedouin); or an expensive voyage by ship through the Suez Canal and subject to British favours.
Recommended publications
  • Re-Visiting the Arab Revolt of 1936-1939 in Palestine
    Oberlin Digital Commons at Oberlin Honors Papers Student Work 2016 Contested Land, Contested Representations: Re-visiting the Arab Revolt of 1936-1939 in Palestine Gabriel Healey Brown Oberlin College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.oberlin.edu/honors Part of the History Commons Repository Citation Brown, Gabriel Healey, "Contested Land, Contested Representations: Re-visiting the Arab Revolt of 1936-1939 in Palestine" (2016). Honors Papers. 226. https://digitalcommons.oberlin.edu/honors/226 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Work at Digital Commons at Oberlin. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors Papers by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons at Oberlin. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Contested Land, Contested Representations: Re-visiting the Arab Revolt of 1936-1939 in Palestine Gabriel Brown Candidate for Senior Honors in History Oberlin College Thesis Advisor: Zeinab Abul-Magd Spring/2016 Table of Contents Acknowledgments………………………………………………………………………………...1 Map of Palestine, 1936……………………………………………………………………………2 Glossary…………………………………………………………………………………………...3 Introduction……………………………………………………………………………………….4 Chapter One……………………………………………………………………………………...15 Chapter Two……………………………………………………………………………………...25 Chapter Three…………………………………………………………………………………….37 Conclusion……………………………………………………………………………………….50 Bibliography……………………………………………………………………………………. 59 Brown 1 Acknowledgements Large research endeavors like this one are never undertaken alone, and I would be remiss if I didn’t thank the many people who have helped me along the way. I owe a huge debt to Shelley Lee, Jesse Gamoran, Gavin Ratcliffe, Meghan Mette, and Daniel Hautzinger, whose kind feedback throughout the year sharpened my ideas and improved the coherence of my work more times than I can count. A special thank you to Sam Coates-Finke and Leo Harrington, who were always ready to listen as I worked through the writing process.
    [Show full text]
  • The Purpose of the First World War War Aims and Military Strategies Schriften Des Historischen Kollegs
    The Purpose of the First World War War Aims and Military Strategies Schriften des Historischen Kollegs Herausgegeben von Andreas Wirsching Kolloquien 91 The Purpose of the First World War War Aims and Military Strategies Herausgegeben von Holger Afflerbach An electronic version of this book is freely available, thanks to the support of libra- ries working with Knowledge Unlatched. KU is a collaborative initiative designed to make high quality books Open Access. More information about the initiative can be found at www.knowledgeunlatched.org Schriften des Historischen Kollegs herausgegeben von Andreas Wirsching in Verbindung mit Georg Brun, Peter Funke, Karl-Heinz Hoffmann, Martin Jehne, Susanne Lepsius, Helmut Neuhaus, Frank Rexroth, Martin Schulze Wessel, Willibald Steinmetz und Gerrit Walther Das Historische Kolleg fördert im Bereich der historisch orientierten Wissenschaften Gelehrte, die sich durch herausragende Leistungen in Forschung und Lehre ausgewiesen haben. Es vergibt zu diesem Zweck jährlich bis zu drei Forschungsstipendien und zwei Förderstipendien sowie alle drei Jahre den „Preis des Historischen Kollegs“. Die Forschungsstipendien, deren Verleihung zugleich eine Auszeichnung für die bisherigen Leis- tungen darstellt, sollen den berufenen Wissenschaftlern während eines Kollegjahres die Möglich- keit bieten, frei von anderen Verpflichtungen eine größere Arbeit abzuschließen. Professor Dr. Hol- ger Afflerbach (Leeds/UK) war – zusammen mit Professor Dr. Paul Nolte (Berlin), Dr. Martina Steber (London/UK) und Juniorprofessor Simon Wendt (Frankfurt am Main) – Stipendiat des Historischen Kollegs im Kollegjahr 2012/2013. Den Obliegenheiten der Stipendiaten gemäß hat Holger Afflerbach aus seinem Arbeitsbereich ein Kolloquium zum Thema „Der Sinn des Krieges. Politische Ziele und militärische Instrumente der kriegführenden Parteien von 1914–1918“ vom 21.
    [Show full text]
  • • International Court of Justice • • • • •
    • • • INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE • • • • • . Request for an • Advisory Opinion on the • Legal Consequences of the • Construction of a Wall • in the Occupied Palestinian Territories • • WRITTEN STATEMENT SUBMITTED BY • THE HASHEMITE KINGDOM OF JORDAN • • • • 30 January 2004 • • • • • TABLE OF CONTENTS • 1. Introduction • Il. General background • III. Immediate background • IV. Relevant facts V. Relevant legal considerations • (a) The Court' s jurisdiction • (i) The request raises a legal question which the Court has jurisdiction ta answer • (ii) There are no compelling reasons which should lead the • Court ta refuse ta give the advisory opinion requested of it. • (b) Applicable legal principles (i) The prohibition of the use of force, and the right of seIf- • determination, are Iules of ius cogens (ii) The territory in whîch the wall has been or is planned to be • constructed constitutes occupied territory for purposes of international law • (lii) The law applicable in respect of occupied territory limîts • the occupying State's power$ (iv) Occupied territory cannot be annexed by the occupying • State • (c) Applicable legal principles and the construction of the wall (i) The occupying State does not have the right effectively to • alIDex occupied territory or otherwise to alter its status (ii) The occupying State does not have the right to alter the • population balance in the occupîed territory by estabIishing alien • settlements • ->- :.• 1 1. • -11- (iii) The occupying State lS not entitled in occupied territory to construct a wall
    [Show full text]
  • Britain's Broken Promises: the Roots of the Israeli and Palestinian
    Britain’s Broken Promises: The Roots of the Israeli and Palestinian Conflict Overview Students will learn about British control over Palestine after World War I and how it influenced the Israel‐Palestine situation in the modern Middle East. The material will be introduced through a timeline activity and followed by a PowerPoint that covers many of the post‐WWI British policies. The lesson culminates in a letter‐writing project where students have to support a position based upon information learned. Grade 9 NC Essential Standards for World History • WH.1.1: Interpret data presented in time lines and create time lines • WH.1.3: Consider multiple perspectives of various peoples in the past • WH.5.3: Analyze colonization in terms of the desire for access to resources and markets as well as the consequences on indigenous cultures, population, and environment • WH.7.3: Analyze economic and political rivalries, ethnic and regional conflicts, and nationalism and imperialism as underlying causes of war Materials • “Steps Toward Peace in Israel and Palestine” Timeline (excerpt attached) • History of Israel/Palestine Timeline Questions and Answer Key, attached • Drawing paper or chart paper • Colored pencils or crayons (optional) • “Britain’s Broken Promises” PowerPoint, available in the Database of K‐12 Resources (in PDF format) o To view this PDF as a projectable presentation, save the file, click “View” in the top menu bar of the file, and select “Full Screen Mode” o To request an editable PPT version of this presentation, send a request to
    [Show full text]
  • Pan-Arabism and Identity Politics: a Between Case Study
    Pan-Arabism and Identity Politics: A between case study design of Iraq 1952-1977 Alex Iliopoulos Master Thesis: International Relations, specialization Global Order in Historical Perspective Faculty of Humanities Based Sciences – Leiden University Date: January 2021 Student number: S1655485 First examiner of the university: Dr. Diana Natermann Second examiner of the university:1 Dr. Anne-Isabelle Richard TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter Page Abstract -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------3 Introduction of research question -------------------------------------------------------------4 CH 1: Pan-Arabism before 1940 (The ‘Awakening’ of Pan-Arabism)-------------------6 CH 2: The (Ethnic) Identity of Pan-Arabism-------------------------------------------------9 CH 3: The between case study research design ---------------------------------------------12 CH 4: Pan-Arabism in Iraq 1940-1952 -------------------------------------------------------15 4.1: Group Identification is fluid -----------------------------------------------------15 4.2: The driving forces behind Pan-Arabism ---------------------------------------17 4.3: ‘Othering’, the ‘out-group’ and ‘scapegoats’ ---------------------------------19 CH 5: Pan-Arabism from 1952-1970 (the in-between period of the two case studies)-21 CH 6: Pan-Arabism 1970-1977, What changed?--------------------------------------------24 Conclusion / Discussion-------------------------------------------------------------------------27 Bibliography--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------32
    [Show full text]
  • The Intifadah and the 1936-1939 Uprising: a Comparison of the Palestinian Arab Communities 1
    The Intifadah and the 1936-1939 Uprising: A Comparison of the Palestinian Arab Communities 1 Kenneth W. Stein The Carter Center March, 1990 Table of Contents 1. Executive Summary 2. Part I-Similarities 3. Part II-Comparisons I. Palestinian Leadership II. Character and Participation III. The Islamic Dimension IV. Duration and Effects 4. Part III - Conclusions 5. About the Author Executive Summary When comparing the 1936-1939 Palestinian uprising in various parts of western Palestine to the present intifadah, 2 taking place in the West Bank, the Gaza Strip, and East Jerusalem, the most striking conclusion is the large number of general similarities between these two manifestations of Palestinian national consciousness. 3 The two most significant differences between the uprisings, however, are first, that the intifadah generated a deeper and more prolonged Palestinian national coherence across all classes than did its predecessor. Second, the intifadah clarified and crystallized Palestinian opinion which in conjunction with other events helped to create a historic compromise in Palestinian public policy. Other major differences between the two uprisings are self-evident. Many pertain to the political environments in which both uprisings unfolded. During the 1936-1939 uprising, there were no existing UN resolutions about Palestine. There was no Israel, no Israeli Arab population, no Palestinian political organization of the stature and strength of the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO), no decade-old Egyptian-Israeli peace treaty as a backdrop to an ongoing larger negotiating process, no decision made by the Hashemites in the midst of the uprising to place the responsibility of diplomatic progress on the shoulders of the Palestinian leadership, no willingness by a significant number of leading Palestinian Arab politicians to accept a Jewish state in a portion of Palestine, and no corresponding willingness on the part of an equally important number of Zionist/Israel leaders to assent to the legitimacy of Palestinian national aspirations.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rise of Arabism in Syria Author(S): C
    The Rise of Arabism in Syria Author(s): C. Ernest Dawn Source: Middle East Journal, Vol. 16, No. 2 (Spring, 1962), pp. 145-168 Published by: Middle East Institute Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4323468 Accessed: 27/08/2009 15:10 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use. Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at http://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=mei. Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed page of such transmission. JSTOR is a not-for-profit organization founded in 1995 to build trusted digital archives for scholarship. We work with the scholarly community to preserve their work and the materials they rely upon, and to build a common research platform that promotes the discovery and use of these resources. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Middle East Institute is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Middle East Journal. http://www.jstor.org THE RISE OF ARABISMIN SYRIA C. Ernest Dawn JN the earlyyears of the twentiethcentury, two ideologiescompeted for the loyalties of the Arab inhabitantsof the Ottomanterritories which lay to the east of Suez.
    [Show full text]
  • TITLE the Implementation of the Balfour Declaration and the British Mandate in Palestine: Proble
    https://research.stmarys.ac.uk/ TITLE The implementation of the Balfour Declaration and the British Mandate in Palestine: problems of conquest and colonisation at the nadir of British Imperialism (1917–1936) AUTHOR Regan, Bernard DATE DEPOSITED 13 April 2016 This version available at https://research.stmarys.ac.uk/id/eprint/1009/ COPYRIGHT AND REUSE Open Research Archive makes this work available, in accordance with publisher policies, for research purposes. VERSIONS The version presented here may differ from the published version. For citation purposes, please consult the published version for pagination, volume/issue and date of publication. The Implementation of the Balfour Declaration and the British Mandate in Palestine: problems of con- quest and colonisation at the nadir of British Imperi- alism (1917–1936) Regan, Bernard (2016) The Implementation of the Balfour Dec- laration and the British Mandate in Palestine: problems of con- quest and colonisation at the nadir of British Imperialism (1917– 1936) University of Surrey Version: PhD thesis Copyright and Moral Rights for the articles on this site are retained by the individ- ual authors and/or other copyright owners. For more information on Open- Research Archive’s data policy on reuse of materials please consult http:// research.stmarys.ac.uk/policies.html http://research.stmarys.ac.uk/ The Implementation of the Balfour Declaration and the British Mandate in Palestine: problems of conquest and colonisation at the nadir of British Imperialism (1917–1936) Thesis submitted by Bernard Regan For the award of Doctor of Philosophy School of Arts and Humanities University of Surrey January 2016 ©Bernard Regan 2016 1 Summary The objective of this thesis is to analyse the British Mandate in Palestine with a view to developing a new understanding of the interconnections and dissonances between the principal agencies.
    [Show full text]
  • Arabian Peninsula from Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia Jump to Navigationjump to Search "Arabia" and "Arabian" Redirect Here
    Arabian Peninsula From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to navigationJump to search "Arabia" and "Arabian" redirect here. For other uses, see Arabia (disambiguation) and Arabian (disambiguation). Arabian Peninsula Area 3.2 million km2 (1.25 million mi²) Population 77,983,936 Demonym Arabian Countries Saudi Arabia Yemen Oman United Arab Emirates Kuwait Qatar Bahrain -shibhu l-jazīrati l ِش ْبهُ ا ْل َج ِزي َرةِ ا ْلعَ َربِيَّة :The Arabian Peninsula, or simply Arabia[1] (/əˈreɪbiə/; Arabic jazīratu l-ʿarab, 'Island of the Arabs'),[2] is َج ِزي َرةُ ا ْلعَ َرب ʿarabiyyah, 'Arabian peninsula' or a peninsula of Western Asia situated northeast of Africa on the Arabian plate. From a geographical perspective, it is considered a subcontinent of Asia.[3] It is the largest peninsula in the world, at 3,237,500 km2 (1,250,000 sq mi).[4][5][6][7][8] The peninsula consists of the countries Yemen, Oman, Qatar, Bahrain, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates.[9] The peninsula formed as a result of the rifting of the Red Sea between 56 and 23 million years ago, and is bordered by the Red Sea to the west and southwest, the Persian Gulf to the northeast, the Levant to the north and the Indian Ocean to the southeast. The peninsula plays a critical geopolitical role in the Arab world due to its vast reserves of oil and natural gas. The most populous cities on the Arabian Peninsula are Riyadh, Dubai, Jeddah, Abu Dhabi, Doha, Kuwait City, Sanaʽa, and Mecca. Before the modern era, it was divided into four distinct regions: Red Sea Coast (Tihamah), Central Plateau (Al-Yamama), Indian Ocean Coast (Hadhramaut) and Persian Gulf Coast (Al-Bahrain).
    [Show full text]
  • Legacies of the Anglo-Hashemite Relationship in Jordan
    Legacies of the Anglo-Hashemite Relationship in Jordan: How this symbiotic alliance established the legitimacy and political longevity of the regime in the process of state-formation, 1914-1946 An Honors Thesis for the Department of Middle Eastern Studies Julie Murray Tufts University, 2018 Acknowledgements The writing of this thesis was not a unilateral effort, and I would be remiss not to acknowledge those who have helped me along the way. First of all, I would like to thank my advisor, Professor Thomas Abowd, for his encouragement of my academic curiosity this past year, and for all his help in first, making this project a reality, and second, shaping it into (what I hope is) a coherent and meaningful project. His class provided me with a new lens through which to examine political history, and gave me with the impetus to start this paper. I must also acknowledge the role my abroad experience played in shaping this thesis. It was a research project conducted with CET that sparked my interest in political stability in Jordan, so thank you to Ines and Dr. Saif, and of course, my classmates, Lensa, Matthew, and Jackie, for first empowering me to explore this topic. I would also like to thank my parents and my brother, Jonathan, for their continuous support. I feel so lucky to have such a caring family that has given me the opportunity to pursue my passions. Finally, a shout-out to the gals that have been my emotional bedrock and inspiration through this process: Annie, Maya, Miranda, Rachel – I love y’all; thanks for listening to me rant about this all year.
    [Show full text]
  • EASO COI Report Syria Socio-Economic Situation Damascus
    Syria Socio-economic situation: Damascus city Country of Origin Information Report April 2021 More information on the European Union is available on the Internet (http://europa.eu) PDF ISBN: 978-92-9465-083-2 doi: 10.2847/957835 BZ--09-21-115-EN-N © European Asylum Support Office, 2021 Cover photo: © gertvansanten via iStock by Getty Images, 10 May 2010, 502837234, url. Shopping people at the entrance of the Big Bazaar in Damascus, Syria. Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged. For any use or reproduction of photos or other material that is not under the EASO copyright, permission must be sought directly from the copyright holders. Country of origin information report | Syria - Socio-economic situation: Damascus city Acknowledgements This report was drafted by the European Asylum Support Office COI Sector. Additionally, the Country of Origin Information Department of the Austrian Federal Office for Immigration and Asylum provided research contributions during the drafting phase of this report by sharing with EASO the English translation of its COI Syria Country Report.1 The following departments and organisations have reviewed the report: Austria, Federal Office for Immigration and Asylum, Country of Origin Information Department France, Office for the Protection of Refugees and Stateless Persons (OFPRA), Information, Documentation and Research Division The Netherlands, Afdeling Ambtsberichten, Ministry of Foreign Affairs It must be noted that the review carried out by the mentioned departments, experts or organisations contributes to the overall quality of the report, but does not necessarily imply their formal endorsement of the final report, which is the full responsibility of EASO.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rise of Arabic Among Jews and Christians (1900–1950)
    PDF hosted at the Radboud Repository of the Radboud University Nijmegen The following full text is a publisher's version. For additional information about this publication click this link. http://hdl.handle.net/2066/156224 Please be advised that this information was generated on 2021-09-30 and may be subject to change. British Journal of Middle Eastern Studies ISSN: 1353-0194 (Print) 1469-3542 (Online) Journal homepage: https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/cbjm20 The Language of the Nation: The Rise of Arabic among Jews and Christians (1900–1950) Heleen Murre-van den Berg To cite this article: Heleen Murre-van den Berg (2016) The Language of the Nation: The Rise of Arabic among Jews and Christians (1900–1950), British Journal of Middle Eastern Studies, 43:2, 176-190, DOI: 10.1080/13530194.2016.1138641 To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/13530194.2016.1138641 © 2016 The Author(s). Published by British Society for Middle Eastern Studies Published online: 25 Jan 2016. Submit your article to this journal Article views: 1247 View related articles View Crossmark data Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at https://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=cbjm20 BRITISH JOURNAL OF MIDDLE EASTERN STUDIES, 2016 VOL. 43, NO. 2, 176–190 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13530194.2016.1138641 OPEN ACCESS The Language of the Nation: The Rise of Arabic among Jews and Christians (1900–1950) Heleen Murre-van den Berg Institute for Eastern Christian Studies, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands ABSTRACT This essay explores the ways in which in the period following the First World War, non-Muslim communities participated in the establishment of Modern Standard Arabic as the foremost symbol of the new states that replaced the Arab provinces of the Ottoman Empire.
    [Show full text]