DOWNLOAD APPLICATION BRIEF V1.0

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

DOWNLOAD APPLICATION BRIEF V1.0 WESTBROOK 33RD APPLICATION BRIEF V1.0 Land Use Redesignation and Policy Amendment February 2021 WESTBROOK 33RD APPLICATION BRIEF V 1.0 PREPARED FOR Truman Development Corporation PROJECT TEAM CivicWorks NORR Architects Bunt & Associates PROJECT CONTACT INFORMATION CivicWorks 587.747.0317 [email protected] PROJECT WEBSITE www.westbrook33rd.com FEBRUARY 2021 2 3 Why Truman? ......................................................................................... 02 CONTENTS Overview ............................................................................................... 04 Site Location .......................................................................................... 05 Policy Context ....................................................................................... 06 Land Use Context ................................................................................. 08 Land Use Redesignation.......................................................................... 09 Existing Buildable Context ..................................................................... 10 Development Rationale ......................................................................... 12 Stakeholder Outreach............................................................................ 14 4 1 For over 30 years, Truman has proudly and Truman is also proud of our legacy of supporting persistently worked to build a better Calgary. As an affordable homeownership in partnership with Alberta-based family-owned developer and builder, Attainable Homes Calgary and the Liberty Affordable we have successfully created thousands of new Homeownership program. Truman has helped homes and over a million square feet of retail, office, to provide over 400 new homes to deserving WHY TRUMAN? and industrial space within the Calgary metropolitan Calgarians. It’s our goal to make a quarter of the area. homes we build truly affordable. Truman’s core belief is that everyone can Live better.® From master planned new communities to individual mixed-use buildings in redeveloping neighbourhoods, we’re committed to building great places through great design. Places that so many Calgarians have chosen to make an investment and Truman’s core belief is call home. As an accomplished master builder, Truman is the builder of choice for countless Calgarians. And we go that everyone can beyond providing refined design and construction, by making customer service and community relationship building our priorities. We know that building ® George Trutina genuinely complete communities requires this Live better. President commitment. www.trumanhomes.com Gateway at West District, Calgary 2 3 OVERVIEW SITE LOCATION This Application Brief was prepared by CivicWorks As the current Land Use District does not support on behalf of developer-builder Truman for two (2) the proposed development vision, the project team assemblies of land at 1714, 1718, 1722 ,1726, 1730, is submitting a Land Use Redesignation application 1734 33 ST SW (Site 1 - South) and 1702 and 1704 33 for the assembled lands, in addition to a concurrent WESTBROOK ST SW (Site 2 - North) in the Calgary community of Development Permit application to demonstrate a LRT STATION Shaganappi. The sites propose low-to-mid scale (6-8 high-quality, mixed-use ‘bricks and mortar’ outcome. storey) mixed-use developments with opportunity for A supporting amendment to the Local Area Plan commercial-retail and / or live-work units at-grade. (Westbrook Village Area Redevelopment Plan) will also be submitted to allow for the proposed The intent of this document is to outline the development vision. surrounding area context and planning analysis that has informed the proposed developments: high- quality, human-scale developments strategically located among several community amenities and 14 AV SW SITE 2 (NORTH) within a Transit-Oriented Development node. The sites greatly benefit from their walking distance to the 17 AV SW and 37 ST SW Main Streets, Westbrook Mall and the Westbrook LRT station. SITE 1 (SOUTH) 7 AVENUE SW 8 AVENUE SW 33 ST SW 32 ST SW Shaganappi Point Golf Course WESTBROOK STATION SHAGANAPPI POINT STATION BOW TRAIL SW Westbrook Mall 37 ST SW MAIN STREET ROSSCARROCK 13 AVENUE SW Shaganappi 17 AV SW MAIN STREET Park SHAGANAPPI 25A STREET SW 14 AVENUE SW SITE 2 (NORTH) 600m (5-10 min Walk Radius) Alex Barbara Ferguson SITE 1 (SOUTH) 16 AVENUE SW Mitchell School Centre MAX TEAL BRT 17 AV SW MAIN STREET Killarney Aquatic & Recreation Centre 25 STREET SW 30 STREET SW 27 STREET SW 26 STREET SW 28 STREET SW 33 STREET SW 29 STREET SW 36 STREET SW 35 STREET SW 34 STREET SW 26A STREET SW 24A STREET SW 31 STREET SW 32 STREET SW 4 5 POLICY CONTEXT 6358&( &/,)) Westbrook Village Area Redevelopment Plan Westbrook Communities Local Area Plan 6+$*$1$33, 5266&$552&. The project sites are located within the boundaries of the The City of Calgary is actively transitioning its The Westbrook Communities Local Growth Plan :HVWEURRN 9LOODJH $53 Westbrook Village Area Redevelopment Plan (ARP), approved key planning tool for local area planning, the Area process is currently underway. This Plan will address by Council in 2009. This plan identifies the sites as “Medium Redevelopment Plan (ARP), to more regionally-based increased growth and redevelopment in the area Density”, which encourages a transition from the existing low strategic growth plans. This approach is intended and will update, consolidate, and replace a number .,//$51(<*/(1*$55< density neighbourhoods to denser housing forms including to manage city-wide growth and development of local policy documents, including the Westbrook 5,&+021' townhouses, apartments and live-work units. The current by addressing the resource-intensive challenge of Village ARP, with estimated delivery for a Calgary maximum Floor Area Ratio (FAR) is 2.5 and the maximum creating individual Local Area Plans for an increasing City Council decision in Fall/Winter 2021/2022. Building Height is 16 metres. number of communities, replacing outdated plans, and filling in the gaps where no local plan currently exists. The City of Calgary’s community district Main Streets strategic growth model will combine several neighbouring communities, with a focus on shared The City of Calgary’s (The City’s) Main Streets initiative history, characteristics, and resources to create 6358&( outlines 24 corridors that possess long term intensification &/,)) a future vision for how land could be used and potential. The project sites are located within the 17 AV SW redeveloped in the area. Main Street Study Area and are sited approximately 500m 6+$*$1$33, 5266&$552&. from the 37 ST SW Main Street. Streetscape Master Plans $96: were completed for the 17 AV SW Main Street in 2020 and 37 ST SW Main Street in 2019, and there will be near-term 676: municipal investment in the public realm (improvements .,//$51(<*/(1*$55< 5,&+021' for all-modes movements and streetscape beautification) to support growth and intensification proximate to these corridors. Transit-Oriented Development WILDWOOD SPRUCE The project sites are within walking distance to three (3) CLIFF of Calgary’s Primary Transit Network corridors—17 AV WESTGATE SW, Bow Trail SW and 37 ST SW—which provide the local 6358&( ROSSCARROCK SHAGANAPPI &/,)) SCARBORO / area with daily public transit with a frequency of every 10 WEST SUNALTA minutes or less, 15 hours a day, 7 days a week. Westbrook GLENDALE 6+$*$1$33, Light Rail Transit (LRT) Station, located 200m from the sites, 5266&$552&. KILLARNEY / acts as one of Calgary’s major transit hubs, housing the Blue GLENGARRY RICHMOND Line LRT, MAX Teal Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) and a number of frequent bus routes providing connections to some of GLENBROOK .,//$51(<*/(1*$55< Calgary’s most important destinations including the University 5,&+021' of Calgary, Mount Royal University and the Downtown Core. The City’s key directions for land use and mobility recognize that, in order to move forward as an efficient city, land use and transit decisions need to be linked with a policy to support population and employment intensification within these key areas. 6 7 LAND USE CONTEXT LAND USE REDESIGNATION The sites are surrounded by a mix of multi- LEGEND Land Use Change Concurrent Application Process residential and commercial districts. Directly to Residential - Contextual One / Two Dwelling District (R-C2) the west of the sites are the Direct Control (DC) To support the redevelopment vision for Westbrook The intent is to submit a concurrent application for District-designated Westbrook Mall / Village sites. To Residential - Grade-Oriented Infill District (R-CG) 33RD, a Land Use Redesignation from the M-C2 Land Use Redesignation and Development Permit the north and east are single-detached and multi- Multi-Residential - Contextual Grade-Oriented District (M-CG) District to the MU-1f5.0h26 District is proposed to for the assembled parcels. A concurrent application residential dwelling types which can be intensified be applied for. This redesignation would allow for Multi-Residential - Contextual Low Profile District (M-C1) process ensures a comprehensive and thoughtful and redeveloped under the existing M-C1 and M-C2 high-quality, mixed-use developments up to 26 metres “bricks and mortar” outcome is clearly understood Districts. To the south is an existing mixed-use, Multi-Residential - Contextual Medium Profile District (M-C2) in building height (6-8 storeys) with FARs of 5.0 and by stakeholders and directly informs decision-making multi-family
Recommended publications
  • Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) and Light Rail Transit
    Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) and Light Rail Transit (LRT) Performance Characteristics Stations Mixed Traffic Lanes* Service Characteristics Newest Corridor End‐to‐End Travel Departures Every 'X' Travel Speed (MPH) City Corridor Segment Open length (mi) # Spacing (mi) Miles % Time Minutes BRT Systems Boston Silver Line Washington Street ‐ SL5 2002 2.40 13 0.18 1.03 42.93% 19 7 7.58 Oakland San Pablo Rapid ‐ 72R 2003 14.79 52 0.28 14.79 100.00% 60 12 14.79 Albuquerque The Red Line (766) 2004 11.00 17 0.65 10.32 93.79% 44 18 15.00 Kansas City Main Street ‐ MAX "Orange Line" 2005 8.95 22 0.41 4.29 47.92% 40 10 13.42 Eugene Green Line 2007 3.98 10 0.40 1.59 40.00% 29 10 8.23 New York Bx12 SBS (Fordham Road ‐ Pelham Pkwy) 2008 9.00 18 0.50 5.20 57.73% 52 3 10.38 Cleveland HealthLine 2008 6.80 39 0.17 2.33 34.19% 38 8 10.74 Snohomish County Swift BRT ‐ Blue Line 2009 16.72 31 0.54 6.77 40.52% 43 12 23.33 Eugene Gateway Line 2011 7.76 14 0.55 2.59 33.33% 29 10 16.05 Kansas City Troost Avenue ‐ "Green Line" 2011 12.93 22 0.59 12.93 100.00% 50 10 15.51 New York M34 SBS (34th Street) 2011 2.00 13 0.15 2.00 100.00% 23 9 5.22 Stockton Route #44 ‐ Airport Corridor 2011 5.50 8 0.69 5.50 100.00% 23 20 14.35 Stockton Route #43 ‐ Hammer Corridor 2012 5.30 14 0.38 5.30 100.00% 28 12 11.35 Alexandria ‐ Arlington Metroway 2014 6.80 15 0.45 6.12 89.95% 24 12 17.00 Fort Collins Mason Corridor 2014 4.97 12 0.41 1.99 40.00% 24 10 12.43 San Bernardino sbX ‐ "Green Line" 2014 15.70 16 0.98 9.86 62.79% 56 10 16.82 Minneapolis A Line 2016 9.90 20 0.50 9.90 100.00% 28 10 21.21 Minneapolis Red Line 2013 13.00 5 2.60 2.00 15.38% 55 15 14.18 Chapel Hill N‐S Corridor Proposed 8.20 16 0.51 1.34 16.34% 30 7.5 16.40 LRT Systems St.
    [Show full text]
  • Westbrook Communities Local Growth Planning Project
    Westbrook Communities Local Growth Planning Project Phase One: ENVISION Engagement & Communications Summary Stakeholder Report Back – SPRING 2020 Table of Contents Westbrook Communities Local Growth Planning Project .................................................. 1 Project overview .................................................................................................................. 1 Communications and engagement program overview ........................................................ 2 Phase One: ENVISION overview .......................................................................................... 3 What did we do and who did we talk to? ............................................................................. 4 About the Westbrook Communities Working Group ........................................................... 6 What did we ask through engagement? .............................................................................. 8 What did we hear throughout engagement? ....................................................................... 9 Summary of input received ................................................................................................ 10 What did we do with the input received? ........................................................................... 16 Project next steps .............................................................................................................. 17 Appendix: Participant demographic information .............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Influence of Service Planning Decisions on Rail Transit Success June 2009 Or Failure 6
    MTI The InfluenceThe of ServiceTransitPlanning Failure DecisionsSuccess or on Rail Funded by U.S. Department of Transportation and California The Influence of Service Planning Department of Transportation Decisions on Rail Transit Success or Failure MTI ReportMTI 08-04 MTI Report 08-04 June 2009 MINETA TRANSPORTATION INSTITUTE MTI FOUNDER Hon. Norman Y. Mineta The Norman Y. Mineta International Institute for Surface Transportation Policy Studies (MTI) was established by Congress as part of the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991. Reauthorized in 1998, MTI was selected by the U.S. Department of Transportation through a competitive process in 2002 as a national “Center of Excellence.” The Institute is funded by Con- MTI BOARD OF TRUSTEES gress through the United States Department of Transportation’s Research and Innovative Technology Administration, the Califor- nia Legislature through the Department of Transportation (Caltrans), and by private grants and donations. Honorary Co-Chair Rebecca Brewster Steve Heminger Stephanie Pinson Hon. James Oberstar ** President/COO Executive Director President/COO American Transportation Metropolitan Transportation Gilbert Tweed Associates, Inc. The Institute receives oversight from an internationally respected Board of Trustees whose members represent all major surface Chair House Transportation and Research Institute Commission New York, NY transportation modes. MTI’s focus on policy and management resulted from a Board assessment of the industry’s unmet needs Smyrna, GA Oakland, CA Infrastructure Committee Hans Rat and led directly to the choice of the San José State University College of Business as the Institute’s home. The Board provides House of Representatives Donald H. Camph Hon. John Horsley # Secretary General policy direction, assists with needs assessment, and connects the Institute and its programs with the international transportation Washington, DC President Executive Director Union Internationale des California Institute for community.
    [Show full text]
  • Green Line: Update on Funding, Staging and Delivery ATTACHMENT 1
    TT2015-0881 Green Line: Update on Funding, Staging and Delivery ATTACHMENT 1 Green Line Update on Funding, Staging and Delivery December 2015 Revision1.0 TT2015-0881 GREEN LINE FUNDING STAGING AND DELIVERY/Att1.pdf Page 1 of 97 ISC: Unrestricted Green Line: Update on Funding, Staging and Delivery TT2015-0881 GREEN LINE FUNDING STAGING AND DELIVERY/Att1.pdf Page 2 of 97 ISC: Unrestricted Green Line: Update on Funding, Staging and Delivery CONTENTS 1. THE GREEN LINE: CALGARY’S NEXT LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT LINE ..............................................4 2. MOBILITY STRATEGY .......................................................................................................................6 3. GREEN LINE CORRIDOR ................................................................................................................16 4. GREEN LINE PROJEct ...................................................................................................................24 5. QUANTIFYING THE INVESTMENT IN THE GREEN LINE ............................................................32 6. FINDINGS FROM A SCAN OF CANADIAN CITIES .....................................................................40 7. FUNDING AND FINANCING .........................................................................................................45 8. STAGING OPTIONS ........................................................................................................................56 9. RETURN ON INVESTMENT ............................................................................................................60
    [Show full text]
  • MAX Orange, Yellow and Teal Shelters Exhibit Select on Paper on Paper Works from the City of Calgary’S Public Art Collection
    EDMONTON TRAIL SAIT NORTH HILL FOOTHILLS MEDICAL CENTRE MO SUNRIDGE MALL Continued on Continued from ALBERTA CHILDREN’S next page previous page HOSPITAL GENESIS CENTRE CENTRE ST 4 ST NW H BRENTWOOD 7 SHOP 19 ST NE RUSSET RD RUNDLE 5 32 AVE NE SADDLETOWNE 44 AVE NE 9 EAT CIRCLE RUNDLESIDE DR 1 WHITEHORN DR 8 31 ST NW BRENTWOOD MARTINDALE FALSHIRE CASTLERIDGE BLVD DR BLVD 6 2 3 4 U OF C 1. SADDLETOWNE CIRCLE Mixed Bed Calgary City Hall West Young Wrestling Fans, Mallia Wild Rice, Lily Pads and 3. Katie Ohe and Diana Un-Jin Cho Artist: Cathrine Greene Artist: Ray Van Nes Calgary Artist: John Snow Summer Breezes Sun Trailing Date: 1987 Date: 1993 Artist: George Webber Date: 1972 Artist: Ted Godwin Artist: William Anderson Medium: Woodcut and Medium: Palladium print Date: 1978 Medium: Lithograph on paper Date: 1986 Date: 1989 intaglio on paper on paper Medium: Silver gelatin print Medium: Oil on canvas Medium: Silver gelatin print MAX Orange, Yellow and Teal shelters exhibit select on paper on paper works from the City of Calgary’s Public Art Collection. Summer Altar East Window, 7. 32 AVE NE Melody Artist: Cathrine Greene Grace Presbyterian Church Sam Livingston Artist: Barbara Milne Counter Untitled #7 Each work represents a unique perspective of an artist Date: 1989 Artist: Ray Van Nes Artist: Lisa Brawn Date: 1990 Artist: Helena Hadala, RCA Artist: Gregory Arnold Medium: Woodcut and Date: 1993 Date: 2009 Medium: Oil on canvas who has resided in Calgary at some point in their lives. Date: 1982 Date: 1967 intaglio on paper Medium: Palladium print Medium: Polychrome woodcut Works featured range in age from 80 years old to art Medium: Woodcut on paper Medium: Acrylic on board on paper created in this decade, and are created by many artists Flight of Fancy 9.
    [Show full text]
  • Blue Line to Airport
    Attachment 3 TT2020-1289 Airport Transit Connector – Blue Line to Airport Connecting the Blue Line LRT from 88 Ave NE Station to the Airport, this project brings travelers and employees to and from the Calgary International Airport, with a stop in the NE industrial area, via a new transit line. 2048 WEEKDAY RIDERSHIP 13,000 CAPITAL COST $600,000,000 NET ANNUAL OPERATING COST $6,800,000 BENEFITS SCORE 75 Station names for display purposes only and subject to change. Additional Considerations • Dependent on future construction of Blue Line Length 6 km NE to 88 Avenue Station. • Coordination required with Airport Trail NE Readiness No interchanges and Calgary International Airport master planning and infrastructure investments. Technology People Mover • Current Airport demand is met by Routes 100 and 300, future travel demand forecasted increases support mode progression to a higher Trip Generators Airport capacity rapid transit connection. • Functional planning complete. • Operating cost primarily based on increased service hours and frequency on the Airport Connector. • Moderate risk to ridership in Increased Crisis COVID-19 recovery scenario due to decreased airport travel. • Supports Calgary’s Economic Strategy by connecting rapid transit lines and enhancing access between the Centre City, airport and the region. ISC: UNRESTRICTED TT2020-1289 ATTACHMENT 3 Page 1 of 20 Attachment 3 TT2020-1289 Airport Transit Connector – Green Line to Airport Connecting the Green Line LRT from 96 Ave N Station to the Airport, this project brings travelers and employees to and from the Calgary International Airport, with several industrial area stops, via a new transit line. 2048 WEEKDAY RIDERSHIP 9,500 CAPITAL COST $750,000,000 NET ANNUAL OPERATING COST $-3,200,000 BENEFITS SCORE 59 Station names for display purposes only and subject to change.
    [Show full text]
  • 306 Bus Time Schedule & Line Route
    306 bus time schedule & line map 306 Max Teal Douglas Glen View In Website Mode The 306 bus line (Max Teal Douglas Glen) has 2 routes. For regular weekdays, their operation hours are: (1) Max Teal Douglas Glen: 5:40 AM - 10:57 PM (2) Max Teal Westbrook: 5:32 AM - 10:42 PM Use the Moovit App to ƒnd the closest 306 bus station near you and ƒnd out when is the next 306 bus arriving. Direction: Max Teal Douglas Glen 306 bus Time Schedule 17 stops Max Teal Douglas Glen Route Timetable: VIEW LINE SCHEDULE Sunday 6:00 AM - 8:00 PM Monday 5:40 AM - 10:57 PM Westbrook Lrt Station 1417C 33 St Sw, Calgary Tuesday 5:40 AM - 10:57 PM 26th Avenue SW Station (Sb) Wednesday 5:40 AM - 10:57 PM 3803 26 Av Sw, Calgary Thursday 5:40 AM - 10:57 PM Richmond Road Station (Sb) Friday 5:40 AM - 10:57 PM 3445 37 St Sw, Calgary Saturday 6:00 AM - 8:00 PM Sarcee Road Station (Eb) Richardson Way SW, Calgary Mount Royal University Terminal 306 bus Info Mount Royal University Station (Sb) Direction: Max Teal Douglas Glen Stops: 17 54 Avenue SW Station (Sb) Trip Duration: 51 min Line Summary: Westbrook Lrt Station, 26th Avenue Rockyview Hospital (Sb) SW Station (Sb), Richmond Road Station (Sb), Sarcee 75 Avenue SW, Calgary Road Station (Eb), Mount Royal University Terminal, Mount Royal University Station (Sb), 54 Avenue SW Heritage Park (Sb) Station (Sb), Rockyview Hospital (Sb), Heritage Park (Sb), Eb Heritage Dr @ Elbow Dr SW, Heritage Lrt Eb Heritage Dr @ Elbow Dr SW Station, Fairmount Drive Station (Eb), Deerfoot 8408 Elbow Dr Sw, Calgary Meadows Station (Eb), Riverbend
    [Show full text]
  • Calgary Crosstown BRT Projects
    Calgary Crosstown BRT Client: Presented by: Ian MacLeod, P. Eng. Project Manager Crosstown BRT Project Team: Contributions by: Chris Jordan, P. Eng., M.Sc. Manager, Service Design Calgary Transit About HDR Founded For more than 100 years, we’ve partnered with our clients to in shape communities and push the 1917 boundaries of what’s possible. With nearly 10,000 professionals in more than 200 offices around the world, we think global and act local. HDR’s transit specialists have completed projects across North America. Our Experience • Ride Share (Uber, Lyft) • Taxi • Paratransit • Bus (feeder, crosstown, mainline) • Express Bus BRT fits within the middle • Streetcar / Tram (mixed traffic) segment of the transit • Bus Rapid Transit (mixed traffic, exclusive right of way / transitway) system continuum. • Light Rail Transit (mixed traffic, exclusive right of way) • Metro Rail / Subway • Commuter Rail • High Speed Rail What is BRT? Bus Rapid Transit is a rubber tired bus based transit system It improves travel speed, reliability, and customer capacity and experience through enhancements to BRT elements. BRT may be implemented in phases or at a scale to match passenger demand and funding availability. BRT Project Components Runningways Stations Vehicles Branding Fare Collection Transit Priority Measures Passenger Information Systems PlusBRT conventional Project Components roadway and signal design components Traffic Analysis and Micro- Roadway Design Traffic Signal Design simulation Modelling Reduced Bus Travel Time Improved Reliability BRT
    [Show full text]
  • Light Rail Transit Designing World-Class Light Rail Transit Systems
    URBAN PASSENGER RAIL Light Rail Transit Designing World-Class Light Rail Transit Systems We are WSP Our cities are evolving. The primacy of the suburbs rising ridership, many governments and transit is waning, and urban living has become fashionable. agencies are recognizing the urgency to expand WSP is one of the world's leading engineering Neighbourhoods that were once filled with smoke their services in order to respond to the increased professional services consulting firms. We are stacks and factories are now gentrifying to welcome demand. New public transit options are essential. dedicated to our local communities and young professionals with their burgeoning families propelled by international brainpower. We and empty nesters who want to enjoy the benefits Light Rail Transit (LRT) offers key advantages are technical experts and strategic advisors of their city. These urbanites do not glorify big that have led to its resurgence in recent decades. including engineers, technicians, scientists, green front lawns with their requisite hours of It offers a lower price point compared to metros, architects, planners, surveyors and environmental mowing and two-car garages, preferring instead which require extensive tunnelling. Many cities specialists, as well as other design, program and shorter commute times, access to restaurants, are also embracing the romance of yesteryear construction management professionals. We museums and shopping, and freedom from the that comes with the renaissance of tramway design lasting solutions in the Property & dependency on cars for transportation. At the same and streetcar systems. New LRT lines help Buildings, Transportation & Infrastructure, time, more people are leaving their rural roots for invigorate neighbourhoods, improving property Environment, Industry, Resources (including cities, in search of better economic opportunities, values, and encouraging new construction.
    [Show full text]
  • Routeahead: Prioritization of Future Capital Projects
    •Click to edit Master text styles RouteAhead: Prioritization of Future Capital Projects SPC on Transportation & Transit Misty Sklar, A/Manager, Transit Planning - Calgary Transit Author/Owner Position,2020 November Department 17 Report # # TT2020-1289 ISC:Attachment Unrestricted # ISC: Restricted / Unrestricted 1 •Click to edit Master text styles RouteAhead • Long-term strategic plan to guide both operational and capital investments in transit • Capital Investment Prioritization has not been updated in 7 years • Council directed Administration “to use the framework and list of major transit growth projects for prioritizing the future stages of growth of the rapid transit network.” 2 •Click to edit Master text styles RouteAhead Network Progress Rapid Transit Network • Major construction has been completed on many Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) Network projects, with service commencing on the: • MAX Orange, • MAX Purple, • MAX Teal and • MAX Yellow lines. • These projects account for 158 kilometers of the 342 kilometers of rapid transit projects planned which equals 46 percent. 3 •Click to edit Master text styles Project List 4 •Click to edit Master text styles Key Points • Prioritization does not include Green Line • Benefits analysis used 2048 • Capital and Operating Costs for 30-years (NPV) 5 •Click to edit Master text styles Prioritization Process • Two Dimensional Process Benefits Using Weighted Criteria • Evaluated benefits using Environmental 10% weighted criteria Ridership • Compared with capital and 30% operating investments Social 20%
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 May Engagement Boards-Stage 1 V2
    Green Line serves the mobility needs of Calgarians Green Line improves Green Line connects Green Line enhances mobility choices people and places quality of life In its entirety, the Green Line Construction of the Green Line Along with the new MAX bus rapid will deliver high-quality is our next step towards transit lines, Calgarians will have transit service to Calgarians completing Calgary’s transit fast, frequent and reliable transit in north-central and network, as described in service that strategically connects southeast communities. RouteAhead: A Strategic Plan communities, employment hubs, for Transit in Calgary. and key destinations across the city. Future Rapid Transit Network G 160 Av N 144 Av NW 144 Av N B Stonegate Sage Hill 128 Av NE North Pointe R Sherwood Country Hills Bv Tuscany 96 Av N Aurora Aero 36 St NE 88 Av NE Crowfoot Airport Terminal MO Edgemont Beddington Saddletowne Saddletowne Ci Martindale Martindale Bv Dalhousie 64 Av N Northland McKnight-Westwinds Falshire Dr Bow River Thornclie Castleridge Bv MO 44 Av NE Brentwood Whitehorn Bowfort Rd Whitehorn Dr 31 St NW 40 Av N University Canada Olympic Park 77 St NW 32 Av NE 70 St NW Rundleside Dr Alberta 63 St NW 28 Av N 26 Av NE Children’s Rundle Hospital Ban Trail Rundlehorn Dr 4 St NW Edmonton TrRusset Rd 19 St NE North Hill SAIT 16 Av N Lions Park Bowwood Dr Foothills Medical Centre 9 Ave N Marlborough Marbank Dr Bow River Home Rd Sunnyside 29 St NWCrowchild Tr19 St NW 14 St NW 2 Ave SW Bridgeland/ Barlow/ Memorial Zoo Franklin 46 St NW Max Bell Green Line Project
    [Show full text]
  • Travel Drumheller Marketing Association Board of Directors Meeting Drumheller & District Chamber of Commerce Wednesday, August 21 2019 10:00A.M
    Travel Drumheller Marketing Association Board of Directors Meeting Drumheller & District Chamber of Commerce Wednesday, August 21 2019 10:00a.m. – 12:00 p.m. Vision: Drumheller is a sought-after tourism destination ​ ​ Mission: To promote Drumheller as a premier year-round destination ​ ​ through quality marketing and stakeholder engagement 1. Call meeting to order 2. Mayor Colberg - Discuss Roger Brooks feedback 3. Approval of agenda 4. Approval of minutes – June 2019 5. Financial report ● as of June 30th Balance Sheet ● as of June 30th Profit and Loss Report ● as of July 31st Balance Sheet ● as of July 31st Profit and Loss Report 6. Consultant report ● See report (included in board package) 7. Administrative report ● See report (included in board package) 8. Unfinished Business ● Chinook Credit Union MasterCard Application Status 9. Discussion Items ● Cindie - general Housekeeping questions / inquiry (TD Phone Number & Board Package Distribution) ● Sarah - Miner’s Trail Map ● General Conversation - Roger Brooks Feedback 10. Adjournment Next meeting: September 18 2019 Travel Drumheller Marketing Association Wednesday, June 19 2019 10 am @ DDCC Board Room MINUTES Present: J. Fielding B. Steeves D. Schinnour R. Semchuk V. Neudorf M. Pears A.Berry D. Dekeyser H. Little E. Secord C. Sereda Absent:T. Vyvey C. Hughes S. Newstead _______________________________________________________________________________ ___ 1. Call to Order R. Semchuk called the meeting to order at 10:35 a.m. M. Pears recorded the minutes. 2. Approval of Minutes M. Pears to correct 2 errors in the May mintues 1. Spelling of Barb Steeves last name 2. Add E. Secord to the attendence Motion by J. Fielding to approve minutes.
    [Show full text]