DOCSLIB.ORG

Legionella Pneumophila Effector Function Using Proteomic Approaches

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Legionella Pneumophila Effector Function Using Proteomic Approaches Elucidating Legionella pneumophila effector function using proteomic approaches Ernest Cheng So Imperial College London Institute of Chemical Biology Department of Chemistry This thesis is presented for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy of Imperial College London and Diploma of Imperial College London 2016 Abstract Legionella pneumophila is the causative agent of Legionnaires’ disease, a severe and potentially fatal pneumonia. This intracellular pathogen proliferates by creating a replicative niche, the Legionella containing vacuole (LCV), inside the host and subverting host signalling pathways. Critical to L. pneumophila’s virulence strategy is its defect in organelle trafficking/intracellular multiplication (Dot/Icm) type IVB secretion system. Using the Dot/Icm, L. pneumophila translocates over 300 effector proteins into the host cell to manipulate signalling pathways. The novel effector LtpG localises to the nucleus upon Dot/Icm-dependent translocation. Genomic deletion of ltpG did not exhibit a L. pneumophila intracellular growth defect in all infection models tested. Although LtpG expression did not cause toxicity in mammalian cells, its filamentation induced by cAMP (Fic) domain caused cytotoxicity in yeast and has auto-AMPylation activity. However, small molecule substrate binding assays suggest a guanosine-containing metabolite is preferred. Determination of LtpG host targets using in vitro protein-protein interaction assays did not yield satisfactory results and consequently a more physiologically relevant infection-based mass spectrometric method was developed. Using the biotin ligase BirA, tagged-effectors were biotinylated in a translocation dependent manner. Effector-host protein complexes formed during infection were subsequently isolated and their composition deciphered using quantitative mass spectrometry. The method was downscaled by over 100-fold from the proof-of-concept study and critical parameters such as number of purifications, lysis conditions and crosslinker reactivity tested. This revealed the infection dependent Rab GTPase binding profiles of the promiscuous Rab binding effectors SidM and LidA. Additionally, HSP90, EEF2 and NACA were identified as high confidence physiological binding partners of LtpG, suggesting a role in manipulation of host translation and autophagic pathways as part of L. pneumophila’s virulence strategy. 1 Declaration of Originality I, Ernest So, declare that this thesis constitutes my own work and that any external contributions are appropriately acknowledged or referenced. Copyright Declaration The copyright of this thesis rests with the author and is made available under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives licence. Researchers are free to copy, distribute or transmit the thesis on the condition that they attribute it, that they do not use it for commercial purposes and that they do not alter, transform or build upon it. For any reuse or redistribution, researchers must make clear to others the licence terms of this work. 2 Acknowledgements “This is not science, this is bullshit…” Gadi Frankel 2016 (completely out of context) Firstly, I would like to thank my supersivors Gadi and Ed for welcoming me into their research groups and giving me the opportunity to pursue a PhD. Your insight and guidance have been essential for not only the progression of the project but also my development as a scientist. An insurmountable thanks to Gunnar who taught me everything I know in the lab. Thank you for your support and wisdom over the many years and always finding time to help me out. You have the patience of a saint for putting up with me for so long. A big thank you to Team Legionella (Corinna and Dani) for lending me a helping hand whenever I needed it and also providing much needed moral support. Thank you to everyone in the Frankel and Tate groups for general scientific discussions and especially for listening to my rants. Also thanks to everyone on CMBI1 for putting up with me for so many years and potentially a few more yet to come… In particular, I would like to thank Goska and Julia for all their help and discussions with the MS work and especially for looking after the rather temperamental Q-Exactive. I would also like to thank Jyoti Choudhary for invaluable help and expertise with mass spectrometry. Thanks to David Charles and Andreas Förster for all their help with the crystallography work and Eleni for her constant help with protein purifications. Also, thanks to Dan Brown with helping me with the radioactivity work. Thanks to the ICB and EPSRC for funding my PhD and in particular for allowing me to be in the same cohort as Jenny and Ben. Our frequent lunches kept me vaguely sane throughout the years. Finally, I would like to thank my wife-to-be Joanna. Thank you for your love and support throughout my PhD and in particular during the thesis writing period. I know it wasn’t easy watching me write in the most chaotic way possible and so I would like to dedicate this thesis to you. 3 Abbreviations AA amino acid ABC ATP-binding cassette ACES N-(2-Acetamido)-2-aminoethanesulfonic acid AD GAL4 activation domain ADP adenosine diphosphate AMBIC ammonium bicarbonate Amp ampicillin AMP adenosine monophosphate ARF1 ADP-ribosylation factor 1 ATP adenosine triphosphate AYE ACES buffered yeast extract AzTB Azide-TAMRA-biotin capture reagent BCA bicinchoninic acid BD GAL4 DNA binding domain BSA bovine serum albumin cAMP cyclic adenosine monophosphate CDK7 cyclin dependent kinase 7 CDP cytidine diphosphate CFU colony forming unit CHAPS 3-((3-cholamidopropyl) dimethylammonio)-1-propanesulfonate Cm chloramphenicol CMP cytidine monophosphate COPI coat protein complex I CTP cytidine triphosphate CYE buffered charcoal yeast extract DAPI 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole DDO double dropout SD (-Leu, -Trp) DMEM Dulbecco's Modified Eagle Medium DNA deoxyribonucleic acid dNTP deoxynucleoside triphosphate Dot/Icm defect in organelle trafficking/intracellular multiplication DSF differential scanning fluorimetry DSP dithiobis(succinimidyl propionate) DTME dithiobismaleimidoethane DTT dithiothreitol EDTA ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid EEF2 elongation factor 2 EM electron microscopy EPF exponential phase form ER endoplasmic reticulum FACS fluorescence activated cell sorting FCS fetal calf serum FDR false discovery rate FF filamentous form 4 Fic filamentation induced by cAMP FL full length GAP GTPase activating protein GDI guanosine nucleotide dissociation inhibitor GDP guanosine diphosphate GEF guanine nucleotide exchange factor GFP green fluorescent protein GMP guanosine monophosphate GnCl guanidinium chloride GST glutathione S-transferase GTP guanosine triphosphate h hour HEPES 4-(2-hydroxyethyl)-1-piperazineethanesulfonic acid HRP Horseradish peroxidase HSP90 heat shock protein 90 HYPE Huntingtin-interacting protein E ID identification IDA iminodiacetic acid IMPA1 inositol(myo)-1(or 4)-monophosphatase 1 IPTG isopropyl β-D-1-thiogalactopyranoside iTRAQ isobaric tagging for relative and absolute quantification Kn kanamycin LB Luria-Bertani LC-MS/MS liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry LCV Legionella-containing vacuole LPS lipopolysaccharide Lsp Legionella secretion pathway MIF mature infectious form min minute MOI multiplicity of infection MS mass spectrometry MVB multivesicular body NAC nascent polypeptide-associated complex NAD nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide NAPPA nucleic acid programmable protein array NDP nucleoside diphosphate NMP nucleoside monophosphate NTA nitrilotriacetic acid NTP nucleoside trisphosphate OD optical density 600 PBS phosphate buffered saline PBST PBS-Tween buffer PCR polymerase chain reaction PEG polyethylene glycol PFA paraformaldehyde PI phosphatidylinositol 5 PI(3)P phosphatidylinositol 3-phosphate PI(3,4)P2 phosphatidylinositol 3, 4-diphosphate PI(3,4,5)P3 phosphatidylinositol 3, 4, 5-triphosphate PI(3,5)P2 phosphatidylinositol 3, 5-diphosphate PI(4)P phosphatidylinositol 4-phosphate PI(4,5)P2 phosphatidylinositol 4, 5-diphosphate PI4K phosphatidylinositol 4-kinase PIP phosphatidylinositol phosphate PLA1 patatin-like phospholipase A1 PMA phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate PPi pyrophosphate PVDF Polyvinylidene fluoride QDO quadruple dropout SD (-Leu, -Trp, -Ade, -His) RNA ribonucleic acid RNAi RNA interference RPF replicative phase form RPMI Roswell Park Memorial Institute medium RT room temperature SAP single Neutravidin affinity purification SCF SKP1-Cullin-F-box SD synthetic defined media SDB-XC poly(styrenedivinylbenzene) copolymer SDS sodium dodecyl sulphate SDS-PAGE SDS polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis Sec general secretory SILAC stable isotope labelling in cell culture SMCC 4-(N-maleimidomethyl)cyclohexane-1-carboxylate SNARE soluble N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor activating protein receptor SNX sorting nexin SOC super optimal broth with catabolite repression SPF stationary phase form SRP signal recognition particle T1SS type I secretion system T2SS type II secretion system T3SS type III secretion system T4SS type IV secretion system T5SS type V secretion system T6SS type VI secretion system TAE Tris-acetate-EDTA TAMRA 5,6-Carboxytetramethylrhodamine TAP tandem-affinity purification Tat twin arginine translocation TBTA Tris[(1-benzyl-1H-1,2,3-triazol-4-yl)methyl]amine TCEP tris(2-carboxyethyl)phosphine TEM β-lactamase 6 TGS Tris-glycine-SDS Tm melting temperature TMT tandem mass tag TRITC tetramethylrhodamine UAT urinary antigen test UBE2T ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme E2 T UMP uridine monophosphate UTP uridine triphosphate
Load more

Recommended publications
  • NCTC) Bacterial Strain Equivalents to American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) Bacterial Strains
    This list shows National Collection of Type Cultures (NCTC) bacterial strain equivalents to American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) bacterial strains. NCTC Number CurrentName ATCC Number NCTC 7212 Acetobacter pasteurianus ATCC 23761 NCTC 10138 Acholeplasma axanthum ATCC 25176 NCTC 10171 Acholeplasma equifetale ATCC 29724 NCTC 10128 Acholeplasma granularum ATCC 19168 NCTC 10172 Acholeplasma hippikon ATCC 29725 NCTC 10116 Acholeplasma laidlawii ATCC 23206 NCTC 10134 Acholeplasma modicum ATCC 29102 NCTC 10188 Acholeplasma morum ATCC 33211 NCTC 10150 Acholeplasma oculi ATCC 27350 NCTC 10198 Acholeplasma parvum ATCC 29892 NCTC 8582 Achromobacter denitrificans ATCC 15173 NCTC 10309 Achromobacter metalcaligenes ATCC 17910 NCTC 10807 Achromobacter xylosoxidans subsp. xylosoxidans ATCC 27061 NCTC 10808 Achromobacter xylosoxidans subsp. xylosoxidans ATCC 17062 NCTC 10809 Achromobacter xylosoxidans subsp. xylosoxidans ATCC 27063 NCTC 12156 Acinetobacter baumannii ATCC 19606 NCTC 10303 Acinetobacter baumannii ATCC 17904 NCTC 7844 Acinetobacter calcoaceticus ATCC 15308 NCTC 12983 Acinetobacter calcoaceticus ATCC 23055 NCTC 8102 acinetobacter dna group 13 ATCC 17903 NCTC 10304 Acinetobacter genospecies 13 ATCC 17905 NCTC 10306 Acinetobacter haemolyticus ATCC 17907 NCTC 10305 Acinetobacter haemolyticus subsp haemolyticus ATCC 17906 NCTC 10308 Acinetobacter johnsonii ATCC 17909 NCTC 10307 Acinetobacter junii ATCC 17908 NCTC 5866 Acinetobacter lwoffii ATCC 15309 NCTC 12870 Actinobacillus delphinicola ATCC 700179 NCTC 8529 Actinobacillus equuli ATCC 19392
    [Show full text]
  • Legionella Shows a Diverse Secondary Metabolism Dependent on a Broad Spectrum Sfp-Type Phosphopantetheinyl Transferase
    Legionella shows a diverse secondary metabolism dependent on a broad spectrum Sfp-type phosphopantetheinyl transferase Nicholas J. Tobias1, Tilman Ahrendt1, Ursula Schell2, Melissa Miltenberger1, Hubert Hilbi2,3 and Helge B. Bode1,4 1 Fachbereich Biowissenschaften, Merck Stiftungsprofessur fu¨r Molekulare Biotechnologie, Goethe Universita¨t, Frankfurt am Main, Germany 2 Max von Pettenkofer Institute, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universita¨tMu¨nchen, Munich, Germany 3 Institute of Medical Microbiology, University of Zu¨rich, Zu¨rich, Switzerland 4 Buchmann Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Goethe Universita¨t, Frankfurt am Main, Germany ABSTRACT Several members of the genus Legionella cause Legionnaires’ disease, a potentially debilitating form of pneumonia. Studies frequently focus on the abundant number of virulence factors present in this genus. However, what is often overlooked is the role of secondary metabolites from Legionella. Following whole genome sequencing, we assembled and annotated the Legionella parisiensis DSM 19216 genome. Together with 14 other members of the Legionella, we performed comparative genomics and analysed the secondary metabolite potential of each strain. We found that Legionella contains a huge variety of biosynthetic gene clusters (BGCs) that are potentially making a significant number of novel natural products with undefined function. Surprisingly, only a single Sfp-like phosphopantetheinyl transferase is found in all Legionella strains analyzed that might be responsible for the activation of all carrier proteins in primary (fatty acid biosynthesis) and secondary metabolism (polyketide and non-ribosomal peptide synthesis). Using conserved active site motifs, we predict Submitted 29 June 2016 some novel compounds that are probably involved in cell-cell communication, Accepted 25 October 2016 Published 24 November 2016 differing to known communication systems.
    [Show full text]
  • Which Organisms Are Used for Anti-Biofouling Studies
    Table S1. Semi-systematic review raw data answering: Which organisms are used for anti-biofouling studies? Antifoulant Method Organism(s) Model Bacteria Type of Biofilm Source (Y if mentioned) Detection Method composite membranes E. coli ATCC25922 Y LIVE/DEAD baclight [1] stain S. aureus ATCC255923 composite membranes E. coli ATCC25922 Y colony counting [2] S. aureus RSKK 1009 graphene oxide Saccharomycetes colony counting [3] methyl p-hydroxybenzoate L. monocytogenes [4] potassium sorbate P. putida Y. enterocolitica A. hydrophila composite membranes E. coli Y FESEM [5] (unspecified/unique sample type) S. aureus (unspecified/unique sample type) K. pneumonia ATCC13883 P. aeruginosa BAA-1744 composite membranes E. coli Y SEM [6] (unspecified/unique sample type) S. aureus (unspecified/unique sample type) graphene oxide E. coli ATCC25922 Y colony counting [7] S. aureus ATCC9144 P. aeruginosa ATCCPAO1 composite membranes E. coli Y measuring flux [8] (unspecified/unique sample type) graphene oxide E. coli Y colony counting [9] (unspecified/unique SEM sample type) LIVE/DEAD baclight S. aureus stain (unspecified/unique sample type) modified membrane P. aeruginosa P60 Y DAPI [10] Bacillus sp. G-84 LIVE/DEAD baclight stain bacteriophages E. coli (K12) Y measuring flux [11] ATCC11303-B4 quorum quenching P. aeruginosa KCTC LIVE/DEAD baclight [12] 2513 stain modified membrane E. coli colony counting [13] (unspecified/unique colony counting sample type) measuring flux S. aureus (unspecified/unique sample type) modified membrane E. coli BW26437 Y measuring flux [14] graphene oxide Klebsiella colony counting [15] (unspecified/unique sample type) P. aeruginosa (unspecified/unique sample type) graphene oxide P. aeruginosa measuring flux [16] (unspecified/unique sample type) composite membranes E.
    [Show full text]
  • Table S5. the Information of the Bacteria Annotated in the Soil Community at Species Level
    Table S5. The information of the bacteria annotated in the soil community at species level No. Phylum Class Order Family Genus Species The number of contigs Abundance(%) 1 Firmicutes Bacilli Bacillales Bacillaceae Bacillus Bacillus cereus 1749 5.145782459 2 Bacteroidetes Cytophagia Cytophagales Hymenobacteraceae Hymenobacter Hymenobacter sedentarius 1538 4.52499338 3 Gemmatimonadetes Gemmatimonadetes Gemmatimonadales Gemmatimonadaceae Gemmatirosa Gemmatirosa kalamazoonesis 1020 3.000970902 4 Proteobacteria Alphaproteobacteria Sphingomonadales Sphingomonadaceae Sphingomonas Sphingomonas indica 797 2.344876284 5 Firmicutes Bacilli Lactobacillales Streptococcaceae Lactococcus Lactococcus piscium 542 1.594633558 6 Actinobacteria Thermoleophilia Solirubrobacterales Conexibacteraceae Conexibacter Conexibacter woesei 471 1.385742446 7 Proteobacteria Alphaproteobacteria Sphingomonadales Sphingomonadaceae Sphingomonas Sphingomonas taxi 430 1.265115184 8 Proteobacteria Alphaproteobacteria Sphingomonadales Sphingomonadaceae Sphingomonas Sphingomonas wittichii 388 1.141545794 9 Proteobacteria Alphaproteobacteria Sphingomonadales Sphingomonadaceae Sphingomonas Sphingomonas sp. FARSPH 298 0.876754244 10 Proteobacteria Alphaproteobacteria Sphingomonadales Sphingomonadaceae Sphingomonas Sorangium cellulosum 260 0.764953367 11 Proteobacteria Deltaproteobacteria Myxococcales Polyangiaceae Sorangium Sphingomonas sp. Cra20 260 0.764953367 12 Proteobacteria Alphaproteobacteria Sphingomonadales Sphingomonadaceae Sphingomonas Sphingomonas panacis 252 0.741416341
    [Show full text]
  • The Risk to Human Health from Free-Living Amoebae Interaction with Legionella in Drinking and Recycled Water Systems
    THE RISK TO HUMAN HEALTH FROM FREE-LIVING AMOEBAE INTERACTION WITH LEGIONELLA IN DRINKING AND RECYCLED WATER SYSTEMS Dissertation submitted by JACQUELINE MARIE THOMAS BACHELOR OF SCIENCE (HONOURS) AND BACHELOR OF ARTS, UNSW In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the award of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING SCHOOL OF CIVIL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING FACULTY OF ENGINEERING MAY 2012 SUPERVISORS Professor Nicholas Ashbolt Office of Research and Development United States Environmental Protection Agency Cincinnati, Ohio USA and School of Civil and Environmental Engineering Faculty of Engineering The University of New South Wales Sydney, Australia Professor Richard Stuetz School of Civil and Environmental Engineering Faculty of Engineering The University of New South Wales Sydney, Australia Doctor Torsten Thomas School of Biotechnology and Biomolecular Sciences Faculty of Science The University of New South Wales Sydney, Australia ORIGINALITY STATEMENT '1 hereby declare that this submission is my own work and to the best of my knowledge it contains no materials previously published or written by another person, or substantial proportions of material which have been accepted for the award of any other degree or diploma at UNSW or any other educational institution, except where due acknowledgement is made in the thesis. Any contribution made to the research by others, with whom 1 have worked at UNSW or elsewhere, is explicitly acknowledged in the thesis. I also declare that the intellectual content of this thesis is the product of my own work, except to the extent that assistance from others in the project's design and conception or in style, presentation and linguistic expression is acknowledged.' Signed ~ ............................
    [Show full text]
  • Host-Adaptation in Legionellales Is 2.4 Ga, Coincident with Eukaryogenesis
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/852004; this version posted February 27, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC 4.0 International license. 1 Host-adaptation in Legionellales is 2.4 Ga, 2 coincident with eukaryogenesis 3 4 5 Eric Hugoson1,2, Tea Ammunét1 †, and Lionel Guy1* 6 7 1 Department of Medical Biochemistry and Microbiology, Science for Life Laboratories, 8 Uppsala University, Box 582, 75123 Uppsala, Sweden 9 2 Department of Microbial Population Biology, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary 10 Biology, D-24306 Plön, Germany 11 † current address: Medical Bioinformatics Centre, Turku Bioscience, University of Turku, 12 Tykistökatu 6A, 20520 Turku, Finland 13 * corresponding author 14 1 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/852004; this version posted February 27, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC 4.0 International license. 15 Abstract 16 Bacteria adapting to living in a host cell caused the most salient events in the evolution of 17 eukaryotes, namely the seminal fusion with an archaeon 1, and the emergence of both the 18 mitochondrion and the chloroplast 2. A bacterial clade that may hold the key to understanding 19 these events is the deep-branching gammaproteobacterial order Legionellales – containing 20 among others Coxiella and Legionella – of which all known members grow inside eukaryotic 21 cells 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Genetic and Functional Studies of the Mip Protein of Legionella
    t1.ì. Genetic and Functional Studies of the Mip Protein of Legionella Rodney Mark Ratcliff, BSc (Hons)' MASM Infectious Diseases Laboratories Institute of Medical and Veterinary Science and Department of Microbiology and Immunology UniversitY of Adelaide. Adelaide, South Australia A thesis submitted to the University of Adelaide for the degree of I)octor of Philosophy 15'h March 2000 amended 14th June 2000 Colonies of several Legionella strains on charcoal yeast extract agar (CYE) after 4 days incubation at 37"C in air. Various magnifications show typical ground-glass opalescent appearance. Some pure strains exhibit pleomorphic growth or colour. The top two photographs demonstrate typical red (LH) and blue-white (RH) fluorescence exhibited by some species when illuminated by a Woods (IJV) Lamp. * t Table of Contents .1 Chapter One: Introduction .1 Background .............'. .2 Morphology and TaxonomY J Legionellosis ............. 5 Mode of transmission "..'....'. 7 Environmental habitat 8 Interactions between Legionella and phagocytic hosts 9 Attachment 11 Engulfment and internalisation.'.. 13 Intracellular processing 13 Intracellular replication of legionellae .. " "' " "' 15 Host cell death and bacterial release 18 Virulence (the Genetic factors involved with intracellular multiplication and host cell killing .20 icm/dot system) Legiolysin .25 Msp (Znn* metaloprotease) ...'..... .25 .28 Lipopolysaccharide .29 The association of flagella with disease.. .30 Type IV fimbriae.... .31 Major outer membrane proteins....'.......'. JJ Heat shock proteins'.'. .34 Macrophage infectivity potentiator (Mip) protein Virulenceiraits of Legionella species other than L. pneumophila..........' .39 phylogeny .41 Chapter One (continued): Introduction to bacterial classification and .41 Identificati on of Legionella...'.,..'.. .46 Phylogeny .52 Methods of phylogenetic analysis' .53 Parsimony methods.'.. .55 Distance methods UPGMA cluster analYsis.'.'...
    [Show full text]
  • Electronic Laboratory Reporting Use Case January 2011
    ILLINOIS HEALTH INFORMATION EXCHANGE Electronic Laboratory Reporting Use Case Electronic Laboratory Reporting and Health Information Exchange Illinois Health Information Exchange Public Health Work Group January 2011 Electronic Laboratory Reporting Use Case January 2011 Table of Contents 1.0 Executive Summary……………………………………………………………………….3 2.0 Introduction…………………………………………………………………...……………..5 3.0 Scope……………………………………..………………………………………………………5 4.0 Use Case Stakeholders…………………………………………………………….….....6 5.0 Issues and Obstacles……………………………………………………………………...8 6.0 Use Case Pre-Conditions .………………….…………………………………………...8 7.0 Use Case Post-Conditions.……………………………………………………………...9 8.0 Detailed Scenarios/Technical Specifications.………………………………10 9.0 Validation and Certification………………………………………………………...12 Appendix ………………………………………………………………………………………….....13 Page 2 Electronic Laboratory Reporting Use Case January 2011 1.0 Executive Summary This Use Case is a product of the Public Health Work Group (PHWG) of the Illinois Health Information Exchange (HIE) Advisory Committee. The Illinois HIE Advisory Committee was constituted as the diverse public healthcare stakeholder body providing input and recommendations on the creation of the Illinois Health Information Exchange Authority (“the Authority”) as the Illinois vehicle for designing and implementing electronic health information exchange in Illinois. The establishment of the Authority marks the formal transition of the work of the HIE Advisory Committee and the Work Groups into alignment with the provisions of Illinois
    [Show full text]
  • Project Number Organisms Bacteria/Virus/Archaea Date
    Project_ Accession Organisms Bacteria/Virus/Archaea Date Sanger SOLiD 454_PE 454_SG PGM Illumina Status Number number P01 Bacteria Rickettsia conorii str.Malish 7 2001 Sanger AE006914 Published P02 Bacteria Tropheryma whipplei str.Twist 2003 Sanger AE014184 Published P03 Bacteria Rickettsia felis URRWXCal2 2005 Sanger CP000053 Published P04 Bacteria Rickettsia bellii RML369-C 2006 Sanger CP000087 Published P05 Bacteria Coxiella burnetii CB109 2007 Sanger SOLiD 454_PE AKYP00000000 Published P06 Bacteria Minibacterium massiliensis 2007 Sanger CP000269 Published P07 Bacteria Rickettsia massiliae MTU5 2007 Sanger CP000683 Published P08 Bacteria BaBL=Bête à Bernard Lascola 2007 Illumina In progress P09 Bacteria Acinetobacter baumannii AYE 2006 Sanger CU459141 Published P10 Bacteria Acinetobacter baumannii SDF 2006 Sanger CU468230 Published P11 Bacteria Borrelia duttonii Ly 2008 Sanger CP000976 Published P12 Bacteria Borrelia recurrentis A1 2008 Sanger CP000993 Published P13 Bacteria Francisella tularensis URFT1 2008 454_PE ABAZ00000000Published P14 Bacteria Borrelia crocidurae str. Achema 2009 454_PE PRJNA162335 Published P15 Bacteria Citrobacter koseri 2009 SOLiD 454_PE 454_SG In progress P16 Bacteria Diplorickettsia massiliensis 20B 2009 454_PE PRJNA86907 Published P17 Bacteria Enterobacter aerogenes EA1509E 2009 Sanger FO203355 Published P18 Bacteria Actinomyces grossensis 2012 SOLiD 454_PE 454_SG CAGY00000000Published P19 Bacteria Bacillus massiliosenegalensis 2012 SOLiD 454_PE 454_SG CAHJ00000000 Published P20 Bacteria Brevibacterium senegalensis
    [Show full text]
  • EVALUATION of the P45 MOBILE INTEGRATIVE ELEMENT and ITS ROLE IN
    EVALUATION OF THE p45 MOBILE INTEGRATIVE ELEMENT AND ITS ROLE IN Legionella pneumophila VIRULENCE A Dissertation by LANETTE M. CHRISTENSEN Submitted to the Office of Graduate and Professional Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Chair of Committee, Jeffrey D. Cirillo Committee Members, James Samuel Jon Skare Farida Sohrabji Head of Program, Warren Zimmer May 2018 Major Subject: Medical Sciences Copyright 2018 Lanette Christensen ABSTRACT Legionella pneumophila are aqueous environmental bacilli that live within protozoal species and cause a potentially fatal form of pneumonia called Legionnaires’ disease. Not all L. pneumophila strains have the same capacity to cause disease in humans. The majority of strains that cause clinically relevant Legionnaires’ disease harbor the p45 mobile integrative genomic element. Contribution of the p45 element to L. pneumophila virulence and ability to withstand environmental stress were addressed in this study. The L. pneumophila Philadelphia-1 (Phil-1) mobile integrative element, p45, was transferred into the attenuated strain Lp01 via conjugation, designating p45 an integrative conjugative element (ICE). The resulting trans-conjugate, Lp01+p45, was compared with strains Phil-1 and Lp01 to assess p45 in virulence using a guinea pig model infected via aerosol. The p45 element partially recovered the loss of virulence in Lp01 compared to that of Phil-1 evident in morbidity, mortality, and bacterial burden in the lungs at the time of death. This phenotype was accompanied by enhanced expression of type II interferon in the lungs and spleens 48 hours after infection, independent of bacterial burden.
    [Show full text]
  • Susceptibility and Resistance Data
    toku-e logo For a complete list of references, please visit antibiotics.toku-e.com Levofloxacin Microorganism Genus, Species, and Strain (if shown) Concentration Range (μg/ml)Susceptibility and Aeromonas spp. 0.0625 Minimum Inhibitory Alcaligenes faecalis 0.39 － 25 Bacillus circulans Concentration0.25 － 8 (MIC) Data Bacillus subtilis (ATCC 6051) 6.25 Issue date 01/06/2020 Bacteroides capillosus ≤0.06 － >8 Bacteroides distasonis 0.5 － 128 Bacteroides eggerthii 4 Bacteroides fragilis 0.5 － 128 Bacteroides merdae 0.25 － >32 Bacteroides ovatus 0.25 － 256 Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron 1 － 256 Bacteroides uniformis 4 － 128 Bacteroides ureolyticus ≤0.06 － >8 Bacteroides vulgatus 1 － 256 Bifidobacterium adolescentis 0.25 － >32 Bifidobacterium bifidum 8 Bifidobacterium breve 0.25 － 8 Bifidobacterium longum 0.25 － 8 Bifidobacterium pseudolongum 8 Bifidobacterium sp. 0.25 － >32 Bilophila wadsworthia 0.25 － 16 Brevibacterium spp. 0.12 － 8 Brucella melitensis 0.5 Burkholderia cepacia 0.25 － 512 Campylobacter coli 0.015 － 128 Campylobacter concisus ≤0.06 － >8 Campylobacter gracilis ≤0.06 － >8 Campylobacter jejuni 0.015 － 128 Campylobacter mucosalis ≤0.06 － >8 Campylobacter rectus ≤0.06 － >8 Campylobacter showae ≤0.06 － >8 Campylobacter spp. 0.25 Campylobacter sputorum ≤0.06 － >8 Capnocytophaga ochracea ≤0.06 － >8 Capnocytophaga spp. 0.006 － 2 Chlamydia pneumonia 0.125 － 1 Chlamydia psittaci 0.5 Chlamydia trachomatis 0.12 － 1 Chlamydophila pneumonia 0.5 Citrobacter diversus 0.015 － 0.125 Citrobacter freundii ≤0.00625 － >64 Citrobacter koseri 0.015 －
    [Show full text]
  • Aquascreen® Legionella Species Qpcr Detection Kit
    AquaScreen® Legionella species qPCR Detection Kit INSTRUCTIONS FOR USE FOR USE IN RESEARCH AND QUALITY CONTROL Symbols Lot No. Cat. No. Expiry date Storage temperature Number of reactions Manufacturer INDICATION The AquaScreen® Legionella species qPCR Detection kit is specifically designed for the quantitative detection of several Legionella species in water samples prepared with the AquaScreen® FastExt- ract kit. Its design complies with the requirements of AFNOR T90-471 and ISO/TS 12869:2012. Legionella are ubiquitous bacteria in surface water and moist soil, where they parasitize protozoa. The optimal growth temperature lies between +15 and +45 °C, whereas these gram-negative bacteria are dormant below 20 °C and do not survive above 60 °C. Importantly, Legionella are well-known as opportunistic intracellular human pathogens causing Legionnaires’ disease and Pontiac fever. The transmission occurs through inhalation of contami- nated aerosols generated by an infected source (e.g. human-made water systems like shower- heads, sink faucets, heaters, cooling towers, and many more). In order to efficiently prevent Legionella outbreaks, water safety control measures need syste- matic application but also reliable validation by fast Legionella testing. TEST PRINCIPLE The AquaScreen® Legionella species Kit uses qPCR for quantitative detection of legionella in wa- ter samples. In contrast to more time-consuming culture-based methods, AquaScreen® assays need less than six hours including sample preparation and qPCR to reliably detect Legionella. Moreover, the AquaScreen® qPCR assay has proven excellent performance in terms of specificity and sensitivity: other bacterial genera remain undetected whereas linear quantification is obtai- ned up to 1 x 106 particles per sample, therefore requiring no material dilution.
    [Show full text]