Bradley International Airport Revenue Bonds

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Bradley International Airport Revenue Bonds NEW ISSUE In the opinion of Co-Bond Counsel, under existing law (i) assuming continuing compliance with certain covenants and the accuracy of certain representations, interest on the Bonds is excluded from gross income for federal income tax purposes, except interest on any Series 2001A Bond for any period during which it is held by a “substantial user” or a “related person,” as those terms are used in Section 147(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and (ii) interest on the Bonds is excluded from the Connecticut income tax on individuals, trusts and estates and from amounts on which the net Connecticut minimum tax is based in the case of individuals, trusts and estates required to pay the federal alternative minimum tax. Interest on the Bonds is included in gross income for purposes of the Connecticut corporation business tax. The Series 2001A Bonds are “private activity bonds” the interest on which is an item of tax preference for purposes of the federal alternative minimum tax imposed on individuals and corporations. The Series 2001B Bonds are not “private activity bonds” and therefore the interest on those Bonds is not an item of tax preference for purposes of the federal alternative minimum tax imposed on individuals and corporations. Interest on the Bonds may be subject to certain federal taxes imposed only on certain corporations. For a more complete discussion of the tax aspects, see “TAX MATTERS” herein. $213,180,000 STATE OF CONNECTICUT Bradley International Airport Revenue Bonds COMPRISED OF $194,000,000 $19,180,000 General Airport Revenue Bonds General Airport Revenue Refunding Bonds Series 2001A (AMT) Series 2001B (Non-AMT) Dated: March 1, 2001 Due: October 1, as shown on the inside cover This Official Statement describes Bradley International Airport (the “Airport”) and other matters relating to the Series 2001A Bonds and Series 2001B Bonds (collectively, the “Bonds”) identified above. The Series 2001A Bonds are being issued to finance various capital improvements at the Airport. The Series 2001B Bonds are being issued to refund a portion of certain outstanding Airport Revenue Bonds of the State of Connecticut (the “State”). The Bonds will be issued under and secured by the Trust Indenture and the First Supplemental Trust Indenture, each dated as of March 1, 2001 (collectively, the “2001 Indenture”) between the State and State Street Bank and Trust Company, as Trustee. The Bonds are special obligations of the State and are payable only from the Pledged Revenues (which includes certain pledged passenger facility charge revenues) and other receipts, funds or moneys pledged therefor pursuant to the 2001 Indenture, subject to a prior lien on Airport revenues securing certain outstanding Airport Revenue Bonds of the State. Neither the State nor any political subdivision thereof is subject to any liability for the Bonds except to the extent of such Pledged Revenues and other receipts, funds or moneys pledged therefor pursuant to the 2001 Indenture. The issuance of the Bonds will not directly or indirectly or contingently obligate the State or any political subdivision thereof to levy or to pledge any form of taxation whatsoever therefor or to make any appropriation for their payment. The Bonds will not constitute a charge, lien or encumbrance, legal or equitable, upon any property of the State or of any political subdivision thereof, except as described in the 2001 Indenture. The Bonds may be owned only in book entry form through a direct or indirect participant in The Depository Trust Company (“DTC”). Interest on the Bonds is payable semiannually on each April 1 and October 1, commencing October 1, 2001. Maturing principal of the Bonds is payable on October 1 in the years shown on the inside cover. Certain of the Bonds are subject to redemption prior to maturity as described herein. The Bonds will not be subject to acceleration upon the occurrence of an event of default or otherwise. The scheduled payment of principal of and interest on the Bonds when due will be guaranteed by a municipal bond insurance policy to be issued simultaneously with the delivery of such Bonds by This cover page contains limited information for quick reference only. It is not a summary of the matters relating to the Bonds. Potential investors must read the entire Official Statement to obtain information essential to making an informed investment decision. See Inside Cover For Maturities, Amounts, Interest Rates And Yields The Bonds are being offered when, as and if issued and received by the Underwriters named below, subject to the approval of their legality by Squire, Sanders & Dempsey L.L.P., New York, New York and Shipman & Goodwin LLP, Hartford, Connecticut, Co-Bond Counsel. Certain legal matters will be passed upon for the Underwriters by Nixon Peabody LLP and Rome McGuigan Sabanosh, P.C., both of Hartford, Connecticut. Ownership of the Bonds is expected to be available through DTC in New York, New York, on or about March 27, 2001. _____________________________________ Honorable Denise L. Nappier Treasurer of the State of Connecticut Bear, Stearns & Co. Inc. First Albany Corporation Goldman, Sachs & Co. Salomon Smith Barney Advest, Inc. A.G. Edwards & Sons, Inc. Apex Securities, Inc. Belle Haven Investments, L.P. First Union National Bank Merrill Lynch & Co. Morgan Stanley Dean Witter M.R. Beal & Co. Quick & Reilly, Inc. Dain Rauscher Incorporated Roosevelt & Cross, Inc. Siebert Brandford Shank & Co., L.L.C. State Street Bank and Trust Co. March 15, 2001 $194,000,000 General Airport Revenue Bonds Series 2001A (AMT) Maturity Principal Interest October 1 Amount Rate Yield 2002 $1,390,000 3.50% 3.20% 2003 1,440,000 3.50 3.50 2004 3,740,000 3.60 3.65 2005 3,880,000 3.75 3.75 2006 920,000 3.80 3.89 2006 3,125,000 5.00 3.89 2007 4,225,000 4.00 4.00 2008 4,400,000 4.10 4.10 2009 1,480,000 4.20 4.23 2009 3,120,000 5.25 4.23 2010 1,445,000 4.30 4.33 2010 3,390,000 5.25 4.33 2011 940,000 4.375 4.42 2011 4,150,000 5.25 4.42 2012 1,280,000 4.50 4.53 2012 4,075,000 5.25 4.53* 2013 5,635,000 5.25 4.63* 2014 5,935,000 5.25 4.73* 2015 6,260,000 5.25 4.82* 2016 6,595,000 5.25 4.90* 2017 6,955,000 5.25 4.97* 2018 7,315,000 5.00 5.06 2019 7,690,000 5.05 5.10 2020 8,095,000 5.125 5.15 2021 8,525,000 5.15 5.17 2022 6,910,000 5.15 5.19 $31,480,000 5.125% Term Bonds due October 1, 2026 – Yield 5.23% $49,605,000 5.125% Term Bonds due October 1, 2031 – Yield 5.25% (plus accrued interest from March 1, 2001) *Priced assuming redemption on April 1, 2012; however, any such redemption is at the optional election of the State. See “THE BONDS – Redemption” herein. $19,180,000 General Airport Revenue Refunding Bonds Series 2001B (Non-AMT) Maturity Principal Interest October 1 Amount Rate Yield 2002 $ 235,000 0 3.25% 0 3.10% 2003 245,000 3.40 3.40 2004 255,000 3.50 3.50 2005 260,000 3.60 3.60 2006 270,000 3.75 3.75 2007 285,000 3.875 3.875 2008 295,000 4.00 4.00 2009 305,000 4.10 4.10 2010 320,000 4.20 4.20 2011 8,190,000 4.25 4.27 2012 8,520,000 4.30 4.37 (plus accrued interest from March 1, 2001) No dealer, broker or other person has been authorized to give any information or to make any representations other than those contained in this Official Statement, in connection with the offering contained herein, and, if given or made, such information or representation must not be relied upon as having been authorized by the State of Connecticut or the Underwriters. This Official Statement does not constitute an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy any securities other than the Bonds, and there will not be any sale of the Bonds where it is not allowed by law. The delivery of this Official Statement at any time does not imply that the information herein is correct as of any time subsequent to its date. IN CONNECTION WITH THIS OFFERING, THE UNDERWRITERS MAY OVERALLOT OR EFFECT TRANSACTIONS WHICH STABILIZE OR MAINTAIN THE MARKET PRICE OF THE BONDS AT LEVELS ABOVE THOSE WHICH MIGHT OTHERWISE PREVAIL IN THE OPEN MARKET. SUCH STABILIZING, IF COMMENCED, MAY BE DISCONTINUED AT ANY TIME. TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION...................................................................... 1 AIP Grants............................................................................43 Purpose of the Bonds.............................................................. 1 FHWA Grants.......................................................................43 Bradley International Airport ................................................. 2 Airport Funds........................................................................43 Security for the Bonds............................................................ 2 Bond Proceeds ......................................................................43 Bond Insurance....................................................................... 4 PFC Program ........................................................................44 Report of the Airport Financial Consultant ............................ 4 Airport PFC Approvals.........................................................45 Miscellaneous......................................................................... 4 Termination of Authority to Impose PFCs............................46 AUTHORIZATION FOR THE BONDS ................................... 5 PFC Funding Issues..............................................................47 Legal Authority—State Bond Commission............................ 5 SOURCES AND USES OF BOND PROCEEDS.....................48 Agreement of the
Recommended publications
  • Idaho Air Services Study
    Idaho Air Passenger Demand Study Introduction Introduction to the Report Commercial airline service is very important to Idaho’s economy. Not only do businesses located in the State rely on the commercial airline industry to support day-to-day activities, but Idaho’s tourist industry is heavily reliant on commercial airline service. There is no national standard for what constitutes good or even acceptable airline service; such standards vary considerably by community. However, convenient access to the national air transportation system is a top priority for many businesses and tourists across the U.S. It is important that Idaho’s major population, business, and tourism centers have commercial airline service to meet their needs. All areas in Idaho have some inherent need or demand for commercial airline service. The volume of this demand is determined by factors such as population, employment, income, and tourism. Where each community’s demand for commercial airline service is actually served is a more complex equation. In the deregulated airline environment, it is not uncommon to find travelers who leave the market area of their local commercial service airport to drive two to three hours to a more distant, larger competing airport. The airport that travelers choose for their commercial airline trips is influenced by a myriad of factors. With the help of the Internet, which is rapidly becoming the number one method for airline ticket purchases, travelers can compare fares, airlines, and schedules among several competing airports. With airline deregulation, some travelers from smaller commercial airport markets around the U.S. have abandoned air travel from their local airport in favor of beginning their trips from larger, more distant airports.
    [Show full text]
  • AWA AR Editoral
    AMERICA WEST HOLDINGS CORPORATION Annual Report 2002 AMERICA WEST HOLDINGS CORPORATION America West Holdings Corporation is an aviation and travel services company. Wholly owned subsidiary, America West Airlines, is the nation’s eighth largest carrier serving 93 destinations in the U.S., Canada and Mexico. The Leisure Company, also a wholly owned subsidiary, is one of the nation’s largest tour packagers. TABLE OF CONTENTS Chairman’s Message to Shareholders 3 20 Years of Pride 11 Board of Directors 12 Corporate Officers 13 Financial Review 15 Selected Consolidated Financial Data The selected consolidated data presented below under the captions “Consolidated Statements of Operations Data” and “Consolidated Balance Sheet Data” as of and for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001, 2000, 1999 and 1998 are derived from the audited consolidated financial statements of Holdings. The selected consolidated data should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements for the respective periods, the related notes and the related reports of independent accountants. Year Ended December 31, (in thousands except per share amounts) 2002 2001(a) 2000 1999 1998 (as restated) Consolidated statements of operations data: Operating revenues $ 2,047,116 $ 2,065,913 $ 2,344,354 $ 2,210,884 $ 2,023,284 Operating expenses (b) 2,207,196 2,483,784 2,356,991 2,006,333 1,814,221 Operating income (loss) (160,080) (417,871) (12,637) 204,551 209,063 Income (loss) before income taxes and cumulative effect of change in accounting principle (c) (214,757)
    [Show full text]
  • Aircraft Noise and Operations Report 2014 Bi-Annual Summary January – June
    Aircraft Noise and Operations Report 2014 Bi-Annual Summary January – June Cincinnati/Northern Kentucky International Airport AIRCRAFT NOISE AND OPERATIONS REPORT 2014 BI-ANNUAL SUMMARY JANUARY - JUNE Table of Contents and Summary of Reports Aircraft Noise Report Page 1 This report details the locations of all complaints for the reporting period. Comparisons include state, county and areas within each county. Quarterly & Annual Comparison of Complaints Page 2 This report shows the trends of total complaints comparing the previous five years by quarter to the current year. Complaints by Category Page 3 Complaints received for the reporting period are further detailed by fourteen types of complaints, concerns or questions. A complainant may have more than one complaint, concern or question per occurrence. Complaint Locations and Frequent Complainants Page 4 This report shows the locations of the complainants on a map and the number of complaints made by the most frequent/repeat complainants for the reporting period. Total Runway Usage - All Aircraft Page 5 This report graphically shows the total number and percentage of departures and arrivals on each runway for the reporting period. Nighttime Usage by Large Jets Page 6 This report graphically shows the total number and percentage of large jet departures and arrivals on each runway during the nighttime hours of 10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m. for the reporting period. Nighttime Usage by Small Jets and Props Page 7 This report graphically shows the total number and percentage of small jet and prop departures and arrivals on each runway during the nighttime hours of 10:00 p.m.
    [Show full text]
  • Notice of Adjustments to Service Obligations
    Served: May 12, 2020 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY WASHINGTON, D.C. CONTINUATION OF CERTAIN AIR SERVICE PURSUANT TO PUBLIC LAW NO. 116-136 §§ 4005 AND 4114(b) Docket DOT-OST-2020-0037 NOTICE OF ADJUSTMENTS TO SERVICE OBLIGATIONS Summary By this notice, the U.S. Department of Transportation (the Department) announces an opportunity for incremental adjustments to service obligations under Order 2020-4-2, issued April 7, 2020, in light of ongoing challenges faced by U.S. airlines due to the Coronavirus (COVID-19) public health emergency. With this notice as the initial step, the Department will use a systematic process to allow covered carriers1 to reduce the number of points they must serve as a proportion of their total service obligation, subject to certain restrictions explained below.2 Covered carriers must submit prioritized lists of points to which they wish to suspend service no later than 5:00 PM (EDT), May 18, 2020. DOT will adjudicate these requests simultaneously and publish its tentative decisions for public comment before finalizing the point exemptions. As explained further below, every community that was served by a covered carrier prior to March 1, 2020, will continue to receive service from at least one covered carrier. The exemption process in Order 2020-4-2 will continue to be available to air carriers to address other facts and circumstances. Background On March 27, 2020, the President signed the Coronavirus Aid, Recovery, and Economic Security Act (the CARES Act) into law. Sections 4005 and 4114(b) of the CARES Act authorize the Secretary to require, “to the extent reasonable and practicable,” an air carrier receiving financial assistance under the Act to maintain scheduled air transportation service as the Secretary deems necessary to ensure services to any point served by that air carrier before March 1, 2020.
    [Show full text]
  • FY18 Airport Statements
    COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL OF REPORT THE AIRPORT For the fiscal years ended ENTERPRISE FUND June 30, 2018 & 2017 An enterprise fund of the City of Charlotte, Charlotte, NC CHARLOTTE DOUGLAS International Airport NORTH CAROLINA Comprehensive Annual Financial Report For the fiscal years ended June 30, 2018 and 2017 As of June 30, 2018: MAYOR: Vi Alexander Lyles MAYOR PRO TEM: Julie Eiselt CITY COUNCIL Dimple Ajmera LaWana Mayfield Tariq Bokhari James Mitchell Jr. Edmund H Driggs Matt Newton Larken Egleston Greg Phipps Justin Harlow Braxton Winston II CITY MANAGER’S OFFICE Marcus D. Jones, City Manager Robert D. Campbell, Acting Chief Financial Officer & Finance Director CHARLOTTE DOUGLAS INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT Brent Cagle, Airport Chief Executive Officer Michael Hill, Airport Chief Financial Officer An enterprise fund of the City of Charlotte, Charlotte, NC Charlotte Douglas International Airport … For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2018 … 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS 7 INTRODUCTORY SECTION 8 LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL 23 CERTIFICATE OF ACHIEVEMENT FOR EXCELLENCE IN FINANCIAL REPORTING 25 FINANCIAL SECTION 26 REPORT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITOR 27 MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS 28 MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS 28 FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS 29 OVERVIEW OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 39 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 40 COMPARATIVE STATEMENTS OF NET POSITION 43 COMPARATIVE STATEMENTS OF REVENUES, EXPENSES AND CHANGES IN NET POSITION 44 COMPARATIVE STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS 46 NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 73 REQUIRED SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION LOCAL GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES'
    [Show full text]
  • 2008 Conference Hotel and Other Information
    2008 IACA Conference Salt Lake City, Utah Hotel, Airport, Transportation, General Information Hotel: Little America 500 South Main Street Salt Lake City, Utah 84101 Tel: 801-596-5700 Fax: 801-596-5911 http://www.littleamerica.com/slc/ Rate: $145/night - plus 12.5% tax Rate is good for 3 days prior and 3 days after the conference, subject to availability. Reservations: 1-800-453-9450 Online: https://reservations.ihotelier.com/crs/g_reservation.cfm?groupID=93657&hotelID=4650 • Cancellations must be made at least 24 hours prior to arrival. • Complimentary parking • Free High Speed Internet Access – Please bring your own Ethernet cord or buy one at the hotel for $6.00 Airport: Salt Lake City International Airport http://www.slcairport.com/ 1 Airlines Serving Salt Lake City International Airport Currently, there are 12 airlines with service from Salt Lake City International Airport. Airline Flight Info Gate Assignment America West Express/Mesa 800-235-9292 A2 2 flights per day American Airlines 800-433-7300 A1 7 flights per day Continental Airlines 800-525-0280 A6 3 flights per day Continental Express 800-525-0280 A6 2 flights per day Delta Air Lines 800-221-1212 B2, B4, B6, B8, B10, 95 flights per day B12, C1-13, D1-D13 Delta 800-453-9417 E Gates Connection/SkyWest Airlines 212 flights per day Frontier Airlines 800-432-1359 A5 6 flights per day jetBlue Airways 800-538-2583 A7 5 flights per day Northwest Airlines 800-225-2525 A4 4 flights per day Southwest Airlines 800-435-9792 B11, B13, B14-B18 44 flights per day United Airlines 800-241-6522 B5, B7, B9 6 flights per day United Express 800-241-6522 B5, B7, B9 10 flights per day US Airways 800-235-9292 A2 5 flights per day Car rental facilities are located on the ground floor of the short-term parking garage directly across from the terminal buildings.
    [Show full text]
  • The Value of Relational Adaptation in Outsourcing: Evidence from The
    The Value of Relational Adaptation in Outsourcing: Evidence from the 2008 shock to the US Airline Industry * Ricard Gil Myongjin Kim Giorgio Zanarone Johns Hopkins U University of Oklahoma CUNEF February 2017 Abstract In this paper, we theoretically analyze, and empirically test for, the importance of relational adaptation in outsourcing relationships using the airline industry as case study. In the airline industry, adaptation of flight schedules is necessary in the presence of bad weather conditions. When major carriers outsource to independent regionals, conflicts over these adaptation decisions typically arise. Moreover, the urgency of needed adjustments requires that adaptation be informal and hence enforced relationally. Our model shows that for relational adaptation to be self-enforcing, the long-term value of the relationship between a major and a regional airline must be at least as large as the regional airline’s cost of adapting flight schedules across joint routes. Thus, when facing a negative economic shock, the major is more likely to preserve routes outsourced to regional airlines that have higher adaptation costs, and hence higher relationship value. We analyze the evolution of U.S. airline networks around the 2008 financial crisis, and we find that consistent with our predictions, routes outsourced to regional networks with worse average weather, and hence higher adaptation costs, were more likely to survive the shock. Keywords: Relational contracting, adaptation, airlines, outsourcing JEL codes: L14, L22, L24, L93 *
    [Show full text]
  • RESOURCE Air Travel 2001
    RESOURCE SYSTEMS GROUP INCORPORATED Air Travel 2001 What do they tell us about the future of US air travel? An Industry Report by Resource Systems Group, Inc. December 2001 331 Olcott Drive, White River Junction, Vermont 05001 802.295.4999 www.rsginc.com www.surveycafe.com TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION..........................................................................................................................................2 THE SURVEY SAMPLE ..............................................................................................................................2 TRIP CHARACTERISTICS..........................................................................................................................2 RESERVATIONS AND TICKETING............................................................................................................3 CHOICE OF TICKETING LOCATIONS ....................................................................................................3 SATISFACTION WITH TICKETING OPTIONS ........................................................................................4 TICKETING SEGMENTS .........................................................................................................................7 AIRPORTS ..................................................................................................................................................7 AIRLINE RANKINGS.................................................................................................................................12
    [Show full text]
  • $350,000,000 the INDIANAPOLIS LOCAL, PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT BOND BANK Goldman, Sachs & Co. Jpmorgan
    NEW ISSUE RATINGS: See "RATINGS" herein Book-Entry-Only In the opinion of Ice Miller LLP, Indianapolis, Indiana ("Bond Counsel"), under existing laws, regulations, judicial decisions and rulings, interest on the 2008 Bonds (hereinafter defined) is excludable from gross income for federal income tax purposes under Section 103 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended and in effect on the date of issuance of the 2008 Bonds (the "Code"), except for interest on any 2008 Bond for any period during which such 2008 Bond is owned by a person who is a "substantial user" of the Airport System (hereinafter defined) or a "related person" as defined in Section 147(a) of the Code. Such exclusion is conditioned on continuing compliance with the Tax Covenants (hereinafter defined). The interest on the 2008 Bonds is a specific preference item for purposes of the federal individual and corporate alternative minimum taxes. In addition, in the opinion of Bond Counsel under existing laws, regulations, judicial decisions and rulings, interest on the 2008 Bonds is exempt from income taxation in the State of Indiana. See "TAX MATTERS" and APPENDIX C—"FORM OF APPROVING OPINION OF BOND COUNSEL" herein. $350,000,000 THE INDIANAPOLIS LOCAL, PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT BOND BANK VARIABLE RATE BONDS, SERIES 2008C (INDIANAPOLIS AIRPORT AUTHORITY PROJECT) Dated: Date of Delivery Due: As shown on the inside cover The Indianapolis Local Public Improvement Bond Bank (the "Bond Bank") will issue its Variable Rate Bonds, Series 2008C (Indianapolis Airport Authority Project), in seven separate sub-series, as shown on the inside cover (collectively, the "2008 Bonds"), pursuant to the Trust Indenture, dated as of June 1,2008 (the "Indenture"), between the Bond Bank and The Bank of New York Trust Company, N.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter Iv Regionals/Commuters
    CHAPTER IV REGIONALS/COMMUTERS For purposes of the Federal Aviation REVIEW OF 20032 Administration (FAA) forecasts, air carriers that are included as part of the regional/commuter airline industry meet three criteria. First, a The results for the regional/commuter industry for regional/commuter carrier flies a majority of their 2003 reflect the continuation of a trend that started available seat miles (ASMs) using aircraft having with the events of September 11th and have been 70 seats or less. Secondly, the service provided by drawn out by the Iraq War and Severe Acute these carriers is primarily regularly scheduled Respiratory Syndrome (SARS). These “shocks” to passenger service. Thirdly, the primary mission of the system have led to the large air carriers posting the carrier is to provide connecting service for its losses in passengers for 3 years running. The code-share partners. losses often reflect diversions in traffic to the regional/commuter carriers. These carriers During 2003, 75 reporting regional/commuter recorded double-digit growth in both capacity and airlines met this definition. Monthly traffic data for traffic for the second time in as many years. History 10 of these carriers was compiled from the has demonstrated that the regional/commuter Department of Transportation’s (DOT) Form 41 industry endures periods of uncertainty better than and T-100 filings. Traffic for the remaining the larger air carriers. During the oil embargo of 65 carriers was compiled solely from T-100 filings. 1 1973, the recession in 1990, and the Gulf War in Prior to fiscal year 2003, 10 regionals/commuters 1991, the regional/commuter industry consistently reported on DOT Form 41 while 65 smaller outperformed the larger air carriers.
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 FINANCIAL OVERVIEW Kent County, Michigan
    2016 FINANCIAL OVERVIEW Kent County, Michigan Daryl J. Delabbio County Administrator/Controller Stephen W. Duarte Fiscal Services Director Kenneth D. Parrish County Treasurer OFFICE OF THE ADMINISTRATOR Kent County Administration Building 300 Monroe Avenue, N.W. Grand Rapids, Michigan 49503-2206 Phone: (616) 336 - 3512 • Fax: (616) 336 - 2523 Administrator’s Office 300 Monroe Avenue NW Grand Rapids, MI 49503-2221 P: 616.632.7570 April 11, 2005 F: 616.632.7565 Moody’s Investors Service Attn: Jonathan North March 31, 2016 99 Church Street New York, NY 10007 RE: 2005 Kent County Financial Overview The Honorable Board of Commissioners The following document presents a “FinancialKent County Overview” Administration for Kent Building County. The information contained herein provides significant 300economic, Monroe demographic Avenue NW and financial information in summary format. It will provide the readerGrand Rapids,with a comprehensiveMI 49503-2221 report demonstrating the financial strength and stability of Kent County government. The document is intended to serve the informationRE: 2016 Kent needs County of individuals Financial Overview and organizations with a financial interest in Kent County including: The following document presents a “Financial Overview” for Kent County. The information contained • Retail Bond Holders/Institutionalherein Investors/Rating summarizes significant Agencies economic, demographic and financial information. It will provide the reader • County Elected Officials. with a comprehensive report demonstrating the financial strength and sustainability of Kent County’s • The Citizens of Kent County. governmental organization. • Businesses doing business or considering locating new business in Kent County. The document is intended to serve the information needs of individuals and organizations with a financial This is an annual publication, the preparationinterest inof Kentwhich County is a cooperative including: effort of the County Treasurer, Human Resources and Fiscal Services staff.
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Airlines U.S Service Trends
    Alabama Summary of scheduled passenger air service 6 airports with scheduled service between 2013 and 2017 • BHM (Birmingham-Shuttlesworth International) -2% departures / -4% seats • DHN (Dothan Regional) -1% departures / -1% seats • HSV (Huntsville International-Carl T Jones Field) -11% departures / -6% seats • MGM (Montgomery Regional) -16% departures / -8% seats • MOB (Mobile Regional) -5% departures / +5% seats • MSL (Northwest Alabama Regional *EAS) +101% departures / -52% seats Overall: departures down -5% and seats down -4% Regional airlines provide 76% of Alabama passenger air service 11 RAA member airlines provide scheduled service to • ExpressJet, PSA, Mesa, SkyWest, Endeavor, Air Wisconsin, Envoy, Trans States, GoJet, Republic, Piedmont State Economic Impact of Small Community Air Service in 2015: $3.6 billion & 41,000 jobs (InterVISTAS Consulting LLC) Source: RAA Analysis of Oliver Wyman PlaneStats OAG schedule data November 2017 Alaska Summary of scheduled passenger air service 213 airports with scheduled service between 2013 and 2017 • DIO (Little Diomede Heliport) lost all air service in 2013 • KKU (Ekuk Airport) lost all air service in 2015 Overall: departures down -9% and seats down -1% Regional airlines: • provide exclusive air service to 94% of Alaska’s airports • provide 89% of Alaska passenger air service (departures) • carried 34% of Alaska passengers in 2016 4 RAA member airlines provide scheduled service to Alaska • Corvus Airlines dba Ravn Alaska, Horizon, Compass, SkyWest Corvus Airlines, Inc. dba Ravn
    [Show full text]