The London School of Economics and Political Science Congress, China

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The London School of Economics and Political Science Congress, China The London School of Economics and Political Science Congress, China and the Cold War: Domestic Politics and Sino-American Rapprochement and Normalisation, 1969- 1980 Paul Coyer A thesis submitted to the Department of International History of the London School of Economics for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, London, May 2013 1 Declaration I certify that the thesis I have presented for examination for the PhD degree of the London School of Economics and Political Science is solely my own work other than where I have clearly indicated that it is the work of others (in which case the extent of any work carried out jointly by me and any other person is clearly identified in it). The copyright of this thesis rests with the author. Quotation from it is permitted, provided that full acknowledgement is made. This thesis may not be reproduced without my prior written consent. I warrant that this authorisation does not, to the best of my belief, infringe the rights of any third party. I declare that my thesis consists of 99,961 words. 2 Abstract The aim of this thesis is to examine the impact of the US Congress on the process of Sino-American rapprochement and diplomatic normalisation during the period 1969-1980. Thus far, research on Sino-American rapprochement and normalisation has focused on the role played by the Executive Branch, ignoring the role played by Congress. This study aims to place Executive Branch actions with regard to China policy in the context of domestic political trends and Congressional actions and attitudes, and locates the process of Sino-American rapprochement and normalisation in the broader context of shifting domestic attitudes toward the Cold War. This thesis demonstrates that rapprochement would not have been possible in the absence of dramatic domestic political changes in the United States, particularly important shifts of perspective within Congress toward the Cold War in general and China in particular. It traces the development of Congressional attitudes towards China, and examines the interaction between Congress and the Executive Branch with regard to China policy. This study argues that the interplay between the Executive and the Legislative Branches during a decade in which Congress was asserting its views on foreign policy is central to understanding the development of China policy during the 1970's. One of the most effective means by which Congress shaped China policy during the period of this study was by means of its ability to define the political space within which the Executive Branch was able to operate with respect to China policy. Attempts on the part of the Executive Branch to deny Congress influence were only partially successful, and although there were limits on Congress's ability to directly influence policy in the 1970's, this thesis demonstrates that Congress had a much greater impact on the development of China policy during the decade than has previously been acknowledged. 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS Abbreviations ..................................................................................................................... 7 Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 10 Historiography ..................................................................................................... 10 The Executive Branch, Congress, and Foreign Policy: A Brief Overview of Approaches …....................................................................................................... 19 Political Science Scholarship Relating to the Congressional Role in Foreign and Defence Policy ...................................................................................................... 29 Aim of the thesis ................................................................................................... 34 Prologue …....................................................................................................................... 37 Congress Helps Build Structure of Containment and Defines Political Space for Permissible Executive Action ............................................................................... 37 Harbingers of Change ........................................................................................... 39 1965 and 1966 House and Senate Hearings Reshape the Terms of Debate ......... 42 Chapter 1: 1969 - 1971 - A New Dynamic Signals Change ............................................. 58 1.1 A New Dynamic: Powerful Constituences for Change and a Weakened China Lobby ............................................................................................................. 59 1.2 Composition of Congress as an Indicator of Change ..................................... 66 1.2 The Challenge to Nixon From the Left .......................................................... 71 1.3 Vietnam, China and Arguments in Favour of Policy Reform ........................ 75 1.4 Conservatives and Nixon's Lobbying ............................................................. 78 1.5 Conflictual Relationship: The White House and the Senate Foreign Relations Committee …................................................................................................. 83 1.6 Ping Pong Diplomacy, Growing Support From Conservatives, and the Race for Peking …........................................................................................................ 86 1.7 End of Formal Congressional Opposition to UN Membership for China ...... 94 1.8 Kissinger's Secret Trip and the Beginning of White House Concessions ...... 94 4 1.9 Misleading Congress Regarding White House Plans to Use a 'China card' .. 97 1.10 Continuing Conflict Between the Administration and the Senate Foreign Relations Committee ................................................................................... 99 1.11 Mobilising Conservative Support …........................................................... 102 1.12 China, Taiwan, and the United Nations ….................................................. 104 1.13 Conclusion ….............................................................................................. 107 Chapter 2: 1972 – August 1974 - A Positive New Dynamic is Marred by Domestic Politics …........................................................................................................................ 110 2.1 Nixon in Peking: The “Tough Negotiator” Makes Concessions and Plans the Misleading of Congress …........................................................................... 112 2.2 Building a Web of Deceit: Nixon's Return and the Debate Over Concessions …................................................................................................................... 114 2.3 Congressional Delegations to China and Their Effect on the New Relationship …................................................................................................................... 121 2.4 Debate Over Taiwan and the Process of Normalisation .............................. 136 2.5 Congress Wrestles With the Strategic Implications of the Opening ........... 145 2.6 Conclusion …............................................................................................... 156 Chapter 3: August 1974 – 1976 - A Lack of Consensus Over Taiwan and Congress Begins a Public Debate Over Sino-American Military Relations .............................................. 157 3.1 Militant Language From Peking and An Acute Lack of Consensus in Congress …................................................................................................................... 159 3.2 The “Abramowitz Study” of 1974 and Congress's role in Pentagon Security Planning ….................................................................................................... 184 3.3 Public Debate Over Sino-American Security Cooperation Legitimises a Radical Policy Concept ................................................................................. 188 3.4 Conclusion …................................................................................................ 202 Chapter 4: 1977 – 1978 - A Divisive Normalisation and Growing Contentiousness ..... 205 4.1 Circumventing Congress ….......................................................................... 206 4.2 Shifting Strategic Perceptions and a Tilt Toward with China ….................. 235 5 4.3 Conclusion …............................................................................................... 249 Chapter 5: 1979 – 1980 - Deepening Distrust, Constitutional Struggle, and the Flowering of Sino-American Security Ties …................................................................................. 251 5.1 The TRA and Executive-Legislative Conflict Over Normalisation and Taiwan's Status ….......................................................................................... 252 5.2 Abandonment of “Evenhandedness” and the Politics of the Tilt Toward China …................................................................................................................... 272 5.3 Conclusion …................................................................................................ 296 Conclusion ….................................................................................................................. 298 Bibliography …............................................................................................................... 313 6 ABBREVIATIONS AA Administrative Assistant
Recommended publications
  • US-China Relations in a Changing Asia-Pacific by TJ Pempel
    BUILDING A REGIONAL ORDER IN EAST ASIA: Community, Competition, Conflict CHU SHULONG EVANS J. R. REVERE YOICHI KATO SUN ZHE YUICHI HOSOYA NOBORU YAMAGUCHI MICHAEL A. MCDEVITT STEPHEN M. YOUNG T. J. PEMPEL March 2016 Our Mission The National Committee on American Foreign Policy (NCAFP) was founded in 1974 by Professor Hans J. Morgenthau and others. It is a nonprofit policy organization dedicated to the resolution of conflicts that threaten U.S. interests. Toward that end, the NCAFP identifies, articulates, and helps advance American foreign policy interests from a nonpartisan perspective within the framework of political realism. American foreign policy interests include: • Preserving and strengthening national security; •Supporting the values and the practice of political, religious, and cultural pluralism; • Advancing human rights; • Addressing non-traditional security challenges such as terrorism, cyber security and climate change; • Curbing the proliferation of nuclear and other unconventional weapons; and • Promoting an open and global economy. The NCAFP fulfills its mission through Track I½ and Track II diplomacy. These closed-door and off-the-record conferences provide opportunities for senior U.S. and foreign officials, subject experts, and scholars to engage in discussions designed to defuse conflict, build confidence, and resolve problems. Believing that an informed public is vital to a democratic society, the National Committee offers educational programs and issues a variety of publications that address security challenges facing the United States. Critical assistance for this volume was provided by Ms. Rorry Daniels, Associate Project Director of the NCAFP’s Forum on Asia-Pacific Security (FAPS); Ms. Juliet Lee, Project Assistant, FAPS; and Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Open Hearing: Nomination of Gina Haspel to Be the Director of the Central Intelligence Agency
    S. HRG. 115–302 OPEN HEARING: NOMINATION OF GINA HASPEL TO BE THE DIRECTOR OF THE CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY HEARING BEFORE THE SELECT COMMITTEE ON INTELLIGENCE OF THE UNITED STATES SENATE ONE HUNDRED FIFTEENTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION WEDNESDAY, MAY 9, 2018 Printed for the use of the Select Committee on Intelligence ( Available via the World Wide Web: http://www.govinfo.gov U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE 30–119 PDF WASHINGTON : 2018 VerDate Sep 11 2014 14:25 Aug 20, 2018 Jkt 030925 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 5011 Sfmt 5011 C:\DOCS\30119.TXT SHAUN LAP51NQ082 with DISTILLER SELECT COMMITTEE ON INTELLIGENCE [Established by S. Res. 400, 94th Cong., 2d Sess.] RICHARD BURR, North Carolina, Chairman MARK R. WARNER, Virginia, Vice Chairman JAMES E. RISCH, Idaho DIANNE FEINSTEIN, California MARCO RUBIO, Florida RON WYDEN, Oregon SUSAN COLLINS, Maine MARTIN HEINRICH, New Mexico ROY BLUNT, Missouri ANGUS KING, Maine JAMES LANKFORD, Oklahoma JOE MANCHIN III, West Virginia TOM COTTON, Arkansas KAMALA HARRIS, California JOHN CORNYN, Texas MITCH MCCONNELL, Kentucky, Ex Officio CHUCK SCHUMER, New York, Ex Officio JOHN MCCAIN, Arizona, Ex Officio JACK REED, Rhode Island, Ex Officio CHRIS JOYNER, Staff Director MICHAEL CASEY, Minority Staff Director KELSEY STROUD BAILEY, Chief Clerk (II) VerDate Sep 11 2014 14:25 Aug 20, 2018 Jkt 030925 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 5904 Sfmt 5904 C:\DOCS\30119.TXT SHAUN LAP51NQ082 with DISTILLER CONTENTS MAY 9, 2018 OPENING STATEMENTS Burr, Hon. Richard, Chairman, a U.S. Senator from North Carolina ................ 1 Warner, Mark R., Vice Chairman, a U.S. Senator from Virginia ........................ 3 WITNESSES Chambliss, Saxby, former U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Iran Nuclear Deal: What You Need to Know About the Jcpoa
    THE IRAN NUCLEAR DEAL: WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW ABOUT THE JCPOA wh.gov/iran-deal What You Need to Know: JCPOA Packet The Details of the JCPOA • FAQs: All the Answers on JCPOA • JCPOA Exceeds WINEP Benchmarks • Timely Access to Iran’s Nuclear Program • JCPOA Meeting (and Exceeding) the Lausanne Framework • JCPOA Does Not Simply Delay an Iranian Nuclear Weapon • Tools to Counter Iranian Missile and Arms Activity • Sanctions That Remain In Place Under the JCPOA • Sanctions Relief — Countering Iran’s Regional Activities What They’re Saying About the JCPOA • National Security Experts and Former Officials • Regional Editorials: State by State • What the World is Saying About the JCPOA Letters and Statements of Support • Iran Project Letter • Letter from former Diplomats — including five former Ambassadors to Israel • Over 100 Ambassador letter to POTUS • US Conference of Catholic Bishops Letter • Atlantic Council Iran Task Force Statement Appendix • Statement by the President on Iran • SFRC Hearing Testimony, SEC Kerry July 14, 2015 July 23, 2015 • Key Excerpts of the JCPOA • SFRC Hearing Testimony, SEC Lew July 23, 2015 • Secretary Kerry Press Availability on Nuclear Deal with Iran • SFRC Hearing Testimony, SEC Moniz July 14, 2015 July 23, 2015 • Secretary Kerry and Secretary Moniz • SASC Hearing Testimony, SEC Carter Washington Post op-ed July 29, 2015 July 22, 2015 THE DETAILS OF THE JCPOA After 20 months of intensive negotiations, the U.S. and our international partners have reached an historic deal that will verifiably prevent Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon. The United States refused to take a bad deal, pressing for a deal that met every single one of our bottom lines.
    [Show full text]
  • East Asian Security Challenges
    EAST ASIAN SECURITY CHALLENGES NATIONAL COMMITTEE ON AMERICAN FOREIGN POLICY NORTHEAST ASIA PROJECTS 2006 Our Mission The National Committee on American Foreign Policy was founded in 1974 by Professor Hans J. Morgenthau and others. It is a nonprofit activist organization dedicated to the resolution of conflicts that threaten U.S. interests. Toward that end, the National Committee identifies, articulates, and helps advance American foreign policy interests from a nonpartisan perspective within the framework of political realism. American foreign policy interests include preserving and strengthening national security; supporting countries committed to the values and the practice of political, religious, and cultural pluralism; improving U.S. relations with the developed and developing worlds; advancing human rights; encouraging realistic arms-control agreements; curbing the proliferation of nuclear and other unconventional weapons; promoting an open and global economy. Believing that an informed public is vital to a democratic society, the National Committee offers educational programs that address security challenges facing the United States and publishes a variety of publications, including its bimonthly journal, American Foreign Policy Interests, that present keen analyses of all aspects of American foreign policy. Q CONTENTS PREFACE . 3 FOREWORD . 7 THE U.S.-CHINA-TAIWAN TRIANGLE: Towards Equilibrium. 11 MULTILATERAL DIALOGUE TO RESOLVE THE NORTH KOREAN NUCLEAR ISSUE:. 14 Fourth Conference on Northeast Asian Security . 15 First Session–The Current State of The Six-Party Talks . 15 Second Session–Where Do We Go from Here?. 17 Some Conclusions . 19 U.S.-JAPAN-ROK RELATIONS AND EAST ASIA: Toward a Northeast Asian Security Forum. 20 U.S.-ROK Relations . 21 U.S.-Japan Relations.
    [Show full text]
  • Nomination of Nicholas Platt to Be United States Ambassador to Pakistan April 26, 1991
    Administration of George Bush, 1991 / Apr. 26 Ellington Choir from the Duke Ellington gan and chairman of the board of directors School for the Performing Arts in Wash- of the National VOLUNTEER Center; Points ington, DC; artist Peter Max; Secretary of of Light honorees Eve Dubrow, David Housing and Urban Development Jack Evans, Al Lewis, Van Standifer, and William Kemp; Jane A. Kenny, Director of ACTION; W. Johnson; and Marlene Wilson, president George Romney, former Governor of Michi- of the Volunteer Management Association. Nomination of Nicholas Platt To Be United States Ambassador to Pakistan April 26, 1991 The President today announced his inten- and chief of the political section at the U.S. tion to nominate Nicholas Platt, of the Dis- liaison office in Peking, China, 1973–1974. trict of Columbia, to be Ambassador Ex- Ambassador Platt served at the Department traordinary and Plenipotentiary to the Is- of State as: Deputy Director and then Di- lamic Republic of Pakistan. He would suc- rector of the Secretariat Staff, 1971–1973; ceed Robert B. Oakley. chief of the Asian Communist areas division Since 1987 Ambassador Platt has served in the Bureau of Intelligence and Research, as U.S. Ambassador to the Republic of the 1969–1971; and China desk officer for the Philippines. Prior to this Ambassador Platt Bureau of East Asian and Pacific Affairs, served as Special Assistant to the Secretary 1968–1969. He also served as a political of State and Executive Secretary of the De- officer at the American consulate general partment of State, 1985–1987; U.S. Ambas- in Hong Kong, 1964–1968; Chinese lan- sador to the Republic of Zambia, 1982– guage training at the Foreign Service Insti- 1984; Deputy Assistant Secretary of State tute and in Taichung, Taiwan, 1962–1963; for International Organization Affairs, and as vice consul of the American con- 1981–1982; and as Deputy Assistant Sec- sulate in Windsor, Ontario, Canada, 1959– retary of Defense for International Security 1961.
    [Show full text]
  • United States
    1372_SPN 11/30/07 2:15 PM Page 1 320-672/B428-S/40003 FOREIGN RELATIONS OF THE UNITED STATES 1969–1976 VOLUME XVIII CHINA 1973–1976 DEPARTMENT OF STATE Washington 1372_chfm.qxd 11/30/07 2:40 PM Page 1 Foreign Relations of the United States, 1969–1976 Volume XVIII China 1973–1976 Editor David P. Nickles General Editor Edward C. Keefer United States Government Printing Office Washington 2007 1372_chfm.qxd 11/30/07 2:40 PM Page 2 DEPARTMENT OF STATE PUBLICATION 11442 OFFICE OF THE HISTORIAN BUREAU OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512-1800; DC area (202) 512-1800 Fax: (202) 512-2250 Mail: Stop IDCC, Washington, DC 20402-0001 1372_chfm.qxd 11/30/07 2:40 PM Page III Preface The Foreign Relations of the United States series presents the official documentary historical record of major foreign policy decisions and significant diplomatic activity of the United States Government. The Historian of the Department of State is charged with the responsibil- ity for the preparation of the Foreign Relations series. The staff of the Office of the Historian, Bureau of Public Affairs, under the direction of the General Editor of the Foreign Relations series, plans, researches, compiles, and edits the volumes in the series. Secretary of State Frank B. Kellogg first promulgated official regulations codifying specific stan- dards for the selection and editing of documents for the series on March 26, 1925. These regulations, with minor modifications, guided the se- ries through 1991.
    [Show full text]
  • Bridging the Sino-American Divide
    Saturday, November 4 (continued) Saturday, November 4 (continued) Sunday, November 5 14:00 Concurrent Sessions I 15:45 Concurrent Sessions II 08:30 American Studies Network Business Meeting (Council Chamber, 8/F, Meng Bridging the Sino-American Divide Wah Building, HKU) US-Sino Relations: The Diplomatic Context (Room 208, Run Run Shaw Build- US-Sino Relations: The Diplomatic Context (Room 208, Run Run Shaw ing, HKU) Building, HKU) 10:30 Concurrent Sessions III Faraway Places, Different Faces: The Context of Sino-American Interactions Cold War in Asia and Its Protagonists Co-Sponsored By: Chair: James A. Kelly Chair: Peter Cunich, Department of History, HKU US-Sino Relations: The Diplomatic Context (Room 208, Run Run Shaw Kenneth Yung, University of Hong Kong, “Walter H. Judd and Sino-American Co-opera- Building, HKU) He Sibing, Independent Scholar, Guangzhou, “Macao in the Making of Sino-US Rela- tion during the Second World War” US-China Education Trust tions: From the Empress of China to the Treaty of Wangxia, 1784-1844” The Asian Context of Sino-US Relations Chair: Nicholas Platt University of Hong Kong Xu Chongning, Chongqing Technology & Business University, “A Great Personality in the Zhang Tao, Sichuan International Studies University, “American Missionaries and War: Understanding Stilwell’s Humanistic Qualities” Zhao Baomin, Shanghai International Studies University, “Rival Masterminds in Chongqing at the End of the 19th Century” Northeast Asia” Christian Ostermann, Cold War International History Project, Washington, DC, “The
    [Show full text]
  • Meeting the Challenges of the New Nuclear Age: Emerging Risks and Declining Norms in the Age of Technological Innovation and Changing Nuclear Doctrines
    Meeting the Challenges of the New Nuclear Age: Emerging Risks and Declining Norms in the Age of Technological Innovation and Changing Nuclear Doctrines Nina Tannenwald and James M. Acton With an Introduction by Jane Vaynman AMERICAN ACADEMY OF ARTS & SCIENCES Meeting the Challenges of the New Nuclear Age: Emerging Risks and Declining Norms in the Age of Technological Innovation and Changing Nuclear Doctrines Nina Tannenwald and James M. Acton With an Introduction by Jane Vaynman © 2018 by the American Academy of Arts & Sciences. All rights reserved. ISBN: 0-87724-122-8 This publication is available online at https://www.amacad.org/nuclearage. Suggested citation: Meeting the Challenges of the New Nuclear Age: Emerging Risks and De- clining Norms in the Age of Technological Innovation and Changing Nuclear Doctrines by Nina Tannenwald and James M. Acton, with an Introduction by Jane Vaynman (Cambridge, Mass.: American Academy of Arts and Sciences, 2018). Cover images: top, left to right: The X-51 Waverider (photo courtesy U.S. Air Force); U.S. Ambassador Llewellyn E. Thompson, left, signs the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty as Soviet Foreign Minister Andrei A. Gromyko watches in Moscow, Russia, on July 1, 1968; standing, left to right: Embassy Political Counsellor David Klien, U.S. Embassy Scientific Attaché Chris- topher Squire, U.S. Embassy Political Officer and Chief Translator Alexander Akalovsky, Soviet Premier Alexei N. Kosygin, unidentified Soviet translator, and Soviet Defense Minister Andrei Grechko (AP Photo). Bottom: Prime Minister Narendra Modi, President Xi Jinping, and Pres- ident Vladimir Putin at the 2016 G20 Summit in China (by Foto: Beto Barata/PR; CC by 2.0, via Wikimedia Commons).
    [Show full text]
  • MR. MICHAEL PILLSBURY: Peter, with Your Permission I’D Like to Talk a Bit About the American Policy Issues Involving Your Breakfast Series
    MR. MICHAEL PILLSBURY: Peter, with your permission I’d like to talk a bit about the American policy issues involving your breakfast series. And also tell everybody here to be sure to read a book called “The Mind of Empire,” whose author is here among us. He is a Harvard- Yale-Oxford Rhodes scholar. The book is quite insightful on China’s world view over the last two or three thousand years. He’s actually sitting right here. His name is Chris Ford. It’s a real treat, this book called “Mind of Empire.” I don’t think it has been translated yet into Chinese, which is a good thing, because if it is he will be denied a visa to visit China, unless he undergoes re-education and apologizes. (Laughter). I was a Senate staffer for about 10 years or more. I wanted to ask, how many staffers are here? Good, quite a few. My own view of how the Chinese see us is that it’s quite a sophisticated view. They are not naïve. They don’t misperceive. They have been caught on numerous occasions committing espionage, in some cases at very high levels, in our country. Anybody who meets with Chinese experts on America comes away impressed with their knowledge. Their view, and I think it’s correct, is that there are two basic strategies towards China in Washington. The first strategy is the executive branch since 1972. They see this largely as continuous. The executive branch has conducted a policy that has no real easy label.
    [Show full text]
  • Expertise, Domestic Politics, and US China Strategy Under Trump
    1 The End of Engagement: Expertise, Domestic Politics, and U.S. China Strategy under Trump What explains the dramatic shift in U.S. strategy toward the People’s Republic of China (PRC), which began in approximately 2016?1 The long-standing strategy of “Engagement,” which aimed to incorporate a rising China into the Western-led international order, has given way to a tough but as-yet-unnamed approach variously termed “competition,” “decoupling,” and for some, “containment” amidst a new “Cold War.”2 The 2015 National Security Strategy (NSS 2015) welcomed “the rise of a stable, peaceful, and prosperous China.” Celebrating “unprecedented” cooperation on issues like climate change, it looked forward to “a constructive relationship…that delivers benefits for our two peoples and promotes security and prosperity in Asia and around the world.”3 Just two years later, however, NSS 2017 labelled China a “revisionist power” that seeks “to shape a world antithetical to U.S. values and interests,” including displacing the U.S. from the Indo-Pacific.4 This shift mirrored a rhetorical change on China emanating from the administration of President Donald Trump, its chief policy manifestation the trade war launched in January 2018.5 1 For stylistic purposes, and following common usage, I frequently refer to the PRC using the shorthand “China.” 2 See, for example, Michael Nacht, Sarah Laderman, and Lisa Beeston, “Strategic Competition in U.S.-China Relations,” Livermore Paper on Global Security No. 5, October 2018; Satoru Mori, “U.S.-China: A New Consensus for Strategic Competition in Washington,” The Diplomat, 30 January 2019; Edward Luce, “The New Era of US-China Decoupling,” The Financial Times 20 December 2018; Michael Mandelbaum, “The New Containment: Handling Russia, China, and Iran,” Foreign Affairs, March/April 2019; Odd Arne Westad, “The Sources of Chinese Conduct: Are Washington and Beijing Fighting a New Cold War?” Foreign Affairs, Vol.
    [Show full text]
  • Strategic Studies Quarterly (SSQ) (ISSN 1936-1815) Is Published Quarterly by Air University Press, Maxwell AFB, AL
    WINTER 2013 Vol. 7, No. 4 Commentaries China’s Nuclear Weapons and the Prospects for Multilateral Arms Control Lt Gen Frank G. Klotz, USAF, Retired Oliver Bloom Convergent Technologies and Future Strategic Security Threats Robert McCreight Chinese-US Relations: Moving Toward Greater Cooperation or Conflict? WINTER 2013 Adam Lowther, John Geis, Panayotis Yannakogeorgos, and Chad Dacus Reforming Defense: Lessons for Arab Republics Zoltan Barany Terrorism in China: Growing Threats with Global Implications Phillip B. K. Potter The Future of US Deterrence in East Asia: Are Conventional Land-Based IRBMs a Silver Bullet? David W. Kearn Jr. Demystifying Conventional Deterrence: Great- Power Conflict and East Asian Peace Jonathan F. Solomon Chief of Staff, US Air Force Gen Mark A. Welsh III Commander, Air Education and Training Command Gen Robin Rand Commander and President, Air University Lt Gen David S. Fadok Director, Air Force Research Institute Lt Gen Allen G. Peck, USAF, Retired Editorial Staff Col W. Michael Guillot, USAF, Retired, Editor CAPT Jerry L. Gantt, USNR, Retired, Content Editor Nedra O. Looney, Prepress Production Manager Tammi K. Dacus, Editorial Assistant Daniel M. Armstrong, Illustrator Advisors Gen Michael P. C. Carns, USAF, Retired Lt Gen Allen G. Peck, USAF, Retired Christina Goulter, PhD Colin S. Gray, DPhil Robert P. Haffa, PhD Charlotte Ku, PhD Benjamin S. Lambeth, PhD John T. LaSaine, PhD Allan R. Millett, PhD Contributing Editors Air Force Research Institute Anthony C. Gould, PhD School of Advanced Air and Space Studies Stephen D. Chiabotti, PhD James W. Forsyth Jr., PhD The Spaatz Center Edwina S. Campbell, PhD Charles E. Costanzo, PhD Christopher M.
    [Show full text]
  • June 08, 1979 Memorandum for Zbigniew Brzezinski from Nick Platt, 'PRC Meeting on PRM-45 Thursday, June 7, 1979,’ June 6, 1979, and Policy Review Committee, 'Korea'
    Digital Archive digitalarchive.wilsoncenter.org International History Declassified June 08, 1979 Memorandum for Zbigniew Brzezinski from Nick Platt, 'PRC Meeting on PRM-45 Thursday, June 7, 1979,’ June 6, 1979, and Policy Review Committee, 'Korea' Citation: “Memorandum for Zbigniew Brzezinski from Nick Platt, 'PRC Meeting on PRM-45 Thursday, June 7, 1979,’ June 6, 1979, and Policy Review Committee, 'Korea',” June 08, 1979, History and Public Policy Program Digital Archive, [Meetings--PRC 110: 6/8/79], Box 25, Zbigniew Brzezinski Collection, Subject File, Jimmy Carter Library. Obtained by Charles Kraus https://digitalarchive.wilsoncenter.org/document/144961 Summary: Brzezinski sent a summary of the PRC meeting, including a discussion on the inter-relationship between troop withdrauwl policy and human rights issues in South Korea. Original Language: English Contents: Scan of Original Document , ' COpy CJ.\RTEAUBRAAY -*'1(3 I,' . I" ~- -~-- ~:--~-.":-,--- (.,r MEMORANDUM 3508-~ NATIONAL SECURITY COUNCIL iEeRS,!, wi TOP SECRET ATTACHMENT June 8, 1979 ACTION MEMORANDUM FOR: ZBIGNIEW BRZEZINSKI FROM: NICK PLATT it SUBJECT: Policy Review Committee Meeting on Korea (S) > ,/'v2AJ: .,) A memo to the President attaching a:sWmnary of the PRC meeting on Korea June 8 is at Tab I~ (S) RECOMMENDATION: That you send it to the President. (U) cSECU'Lw/ TOP SECRET ATTACHMENT OlUGIllAL CL BY~~__........--!",,!,,-,,,,__ E1 DEeD [i m:vr OJ' Jpne 8« ;1.985 EXT B!lm 6 nwtS BY______ ~o. DECLASSIFIED ____________________ _ 0.12958, Sec.3~6 ~:JIfIti.JIL"NMs~'•. DA~;r;j;t , '." ;', . ' . -~~"7~~-,-',-,,'"-;"-~_~a:-k-(Irii_{w"4i¥1 .HHF.P;qs"f#.. ....---.. -----,--~~ .............. ~-.~-....-~- ...... -"~ .-,.-.~--•. --....,..-'" ""--'~'-'-';-'-'-'~"--~---"""-7''''';'-:-~''' ,~~--~--~--~~~~--~~--------~--~~'~ .. ~... J.4 ; • ,~.f:" " COpy f' • ~TERl.iB~' ,( -J,..\~ ME)rIORANDCM [' l __,",_~_________ _ __.__ 3508;"~ THE WHITE HOUSE WAsm:-:c;..TO:-:.....
    [Show full text]