DOCSLIB.ORG

Visibility and Torture: on the Appropriation of Surveillance Footage in YOU DON’T LIKE the TRUTH 2019

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Repositorium für die Medienwissenschaft Sebastian Köthe Visibility and Torture: On the Appropriation of Surveillance Footage in YOU DON’T LIKE THE TRUTH 2019 https://doi.org/10.25969/mediarep/14800 Veröffentlichungsversion / published version Zeitschriftenartikel / journal article Empfohlene Zitierung / Suggested Citation: Köthe, Sebastian: Visibility and Torture: On the Appropriation of Surveillance Footage in YOU DON’T LIKE THE TRUTH. In: Research in Film and History. Research, Debates and Projects 2.0 (2019), Nr. 2, S. 1– 9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25969/mediarep/14800. Erstmalig hier erschienen / Initial publication here: https://film-history.org/issues/text/visibility-and-torture-appropriation-surveillance-footage-you-dont-truth Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Dieser Text wird unter einer Creative Commons - This document is made available under a creative commons - Namensnennung - Nicht kommerziell - Keine Bearbeitungen 4.0/ Attribution - Non Commercial - No Derivatives 4.0/ License. For Lizenz zur Verfügung gestellt. Nähere Auskünfte zu dieser Lizenz more information see: finden Sie hier: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ 1 Visibility and Torture: On the Appropriation of Surveillance Footage in YOU DON’T LIKE THE TRUTH Sebastian Köthe Published: November 25, 2019 Figure 1. YOU DON’T LIKE THE TRUTH, Luc Côté and Patricio Henriquez, AU/CA/UK 2010 YOU DON'T LIKE THE TRUTH, DVD KinoSmith © original copyright holders “Clean”Torture: Invisibility and Strategic Visibility So-called “clean” or “white” torture causes suffering to defenseless people, employing a style that aims to evade reconstructions, reimaginations, and acknowledgment. In the “global war on terror” waged at Guantánamo Bay and the CIA black sites, torture is neither a state of exception nor a sudden rupture of civilization, but is based on twentieth-century practices of democratic torture. Due to democracy’s constitutive need of legitimization, a growing critique of state violence, and new means of state monitoring, leading democracies invented ways to enforce false confessions and to terrorize even their own populations without leaving traces on their victims’ 1 1. Darius Rejali, Torture and bodies. Paradigmatic examples of these techniques are isolation, sensory Democracy (Princeton and deprivation by exposure to bright light or darkness, sensory overload using Oxford: Princeton University white noise, “stress positions” in which bodies are forced to harm themselves Press, 2007), 1–33. Research in Film and History ‣ Issue 2 2019 ©The Author(s) 2019. Published by Research in Film and History. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons BY–NC–ND 4.0 License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). 2 (e.g. by being forced to stand for prolonged periods), and 2. For a broad study of “clean” 2 torture from the perspective of “waterboarding.” These techniques could be quickly adapted to the “war on phenomenology and theater terror,” as they are used in US national territory in migrant detention centers, studies, see Carola Hilbrand, in supermax prisons, and—to a certain degree—in the t raining of US troops. Saubere Folter: Auf den Spuren They turn the constitutive openness of human perception, sensitivity, and unsichtbarer Gewalt (Bielefeld: transcript Verlag, 2015). sociality against itself: in “clean” torture, the relationality to the world, to others, and to one’s own body does not enable the constitution of personhood, 3. Lisa Guenther develops this intersubjectivity, or worldliness, but inverts them painfully.3 This annihilation is argument further in her excellent …. study on solitary confinement: deniable and strategically visible. The iconic photographs of the sensory- “Persons who are structured as deprived prisoners kneeling on Guantánamo’s soil in Jnuary 2002 were not intentional consciousness but are leaked by investigative journalists but rather publicized by the Department of deprived of a diverse, open- ended perceptual experience of Defense itself. Their goal is to terrorize and exert power over whole the world, or who are structured populations by claiming infinite sovereignty over surrogate victims. as transcendental intersubjectivity but are deprived of concrete relations to others, have the very In this article, I ask about the relationship between visib ility and violence. Even structure of their Being-in-the- though visibilization is legitimized as a technology of surveillance, where world turned against them and security is gained through knowledge, its decisive function is not used to exploit their fundamental relationality.” Lisa Guenther, epistemological, but as a mode of torture. How can visibility be violent? If this Solitary Confinement: Social violence consists in making human beings excessively visible, and if critical Death and Its Afterlives filmic research usually involves enhancing visibility, how can it avoid (Minneapolis and London: University of Minnesota Press, reproducing violence? Are there modes of filmic counterhistoriography that do 2013), xv. produce visibility differently, appropriating and reframing ambiguous source materials? These questions are raised by the documentary YOU DON'T LIKE THE TRUTH (AU/CA/UK 2010), which was the first and only film to show surveillance camera videos from an interrogation in Gu antánamo. The film does reproduce perpetrator images that violate the rights of the depicted subject, teenage interrogatee Omar Khadr, but it also strives to reframe the depicted violence, becoming an important source in the campaign for Khadr’s liberation. How are critical aesthetic, epistemic, or for ensic appropriations of these surveillance images—that not only depict violence, but manifest it themselves—possible? Visibility as Torture in Guantánamo Bay Being detained in Guantánamo means to be incessantly visible to others. This is ensured by a technological and architectural dispositif as well as body techniques of surveillance (including totalitarian regimes of command and obedience; the immobilization of prisoners through sha ckles, cages, or wounds; sensory deprivation, for example by hoodings that disable the reciprocity of gazes; or withholding protective property such as blankets or clothing) and surveillance of the most intimate self-relations (showering, defecation, 4. This regime of discipline also masturbation, self-harm, suicide). It was not for nothi ng that “Camp X-Ray,” demands excessive obedience the name of a now-abandoned camp, alluded to a visualization of the inside of from its own guards, who are 4 regulated by a 240-page Standard the body. Operating Procedure, covering body and cell searches, counting The ubiquitous use of surveillance cameras not only heightens the intensity of systems, record keeping, and the visibility, but also constitutes archives. Between 2002 and 2005, all 24,000 surveillance of daily procedures such as shaving, prayers, and interrogations in Guantánamo were recorded. Until 2008, all “activities” in the recreational breaks. camps were recorded, 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. Detainees have reported Research in Film and History 2 2019 ‣ Sebastian Köthe ‣ Visibility and Torture 3 that there were cameras in their cells, which they found behind clocks in 5. Mark Denbeaux et al., “Spying on Attorneys at GTMO: Guantanamo interrogation rooms or disguised in pens. In 2013, lawyers discovered that Bay Military Commissions and the confidential talks with clients were being illegally bugged and that low-resolution Destruction of the Attorney–Client 5 Relationship,” 3, 7, 16, https:// cameras could decipher even the smallest notes. law.shu.edu/ProgramsCenters/ PublicIntGovServ/policyresearch/ upload/ While the digital photographs of torture in Abu Ghraib have been excessively spying_on_attorneys_at_GTMO.pdf disseminated, it is important to understand photography and video as everyday means of exerting control. For example, the CIA produced some 14,000 6. Adam Goldman, “CIA photos of ‘black sites’ could complicate photographs at their black sites. Supposedly, they contain images that Guantánamo trials,” Miami Herald, “document how money was being spent”: mugshots as well as nude pictures June 29, 2015, https:// www.miamiherald.com/news/ 6 of prisoners during their rendition and arrival at the camp. All prisoners nation-world/world/americas/ went through this procedure, which was legitimized as “documentation” of guantanamo/article25749451.html 7 their health conditions. 7. “In most cases, the detainee was stripped of his clothes, photographed naked, and administered a body In Moazzam Begg’s 2004 open letter from Guantánamo, he demands a “logical cavity search (rectal examination). and reasonable answer” to the question of “[w]hy I was physically abused, and Some detainees described the insertion of a suppository at that time degradingly stripped by force, then paraded in front of several cameras toted […] Mehdi said in his interview that by U.S. personnel.”8 “Stripped by force” means that the prisoners’ clothes he remains concerned about the existence of these photos.” Human were cut from their bodies with scissors, which articulates an ambivalent Rights Watch, Delivered into Enemy proximity to the overpowered body: on the one hand, the abducted Hands: US-Led Abuse and Rendition of Opponents to Gaddafi’s Libya, 36, person loses autonomy even over the process of undressing himself. On the 89, https://www.hrw.org/ other hand, the scissors enable perpetrators
Recommended publications
  • Day Two of Military Judge Questioning 9/11 Accused About Self-Representation

    Day Two of Military Judge Questioning 9/11 Accused About Self-Representation

    Public amnesty international USA Guantánamo: Day two of military judge questioning 9/11 accused about self-representation 11 July 2008 AI Index: AMR 51/077/2008 On 10 July 2008, military commission judge US Marine Colonel Ralph Kohlmann held further proceedings to question the men accused of orchestrating the attacks of 11 September 2001 about their decision to represent themselves at their forthcoming death penalty trial in the US Naval Base in Guantánamo Bay, Cuba. Amnesty International had an observer at the proceedings. The primary purpose of the hearings was to inquire of each of the accused individually about whether they had been intimidated before or during their arraignment on 5 June 2008 into making a choice to represent themselves, or whether this decision had been made knowingly and voluntarily. Judge Kohlmann had questioned two of the accused, ‘Ali ‘Abd al-‘Aziz ‘Ali (‘Ammar al Baluchi) and Mustafa al Hawsawi at individual sessions held on 9 July (see http://www.amnesty.org/en/library/info/AMR51/076/2008/en). He had scheduled sessions for the other three men, Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, Walid bin Attash and Ramzi bin al-Shibh on 10 July. In the event, Ramzi bin al-Shibh refused to come to his session. It seems unlikely that the military judge will question him again on the matter of legal representation until the issue of Ramzi bin al-Shibh’s mental competency is addressed at a hearing scheduled to take place next month (see http://www.amnesty.org/en/library/info/AMR51/074/2008/en). Both Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and Walid bin Attash denied that they had been intimidated or that any intimidation had taken place.
  • BA Oppgave.Pages

    BA Oppgave.Pages

    ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! «…It’s nothing but torture» It’s time for a serious reaction to music torture ! Inger-Maren Helliksen Fjeldheim May 18th! 2018 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! "1 av "17 !Abstract For years music has been used as a method of torture in American run prisons such as Bagram and Guantanamo. The American government calls it harsh interrogation and claim the music torture is kinder and less severe as it does not inflict physical damage on the prisoner. ! It is not within our power to know whether death is worse a fate for humans than a life of trauma. !Before we know this for certain, we cannot to claim that one fate is better or worse than the other. Musicians have known for a long time that their music is used for torture, and yet there as been little to no reaction. As musicians and music lovers we cannot sit idly by while what is supposed to be a source of comfort and happiness, is used for such deplorable purpose. It is time for a serious reaction to music torture. ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! "2 av "17 Index ! Abstract 2 ! I Introduction 3 ! II Music and Torture- What it is and where it comes from 4 ! III The Use of a Song- Drowning Pool and their song Bodies 5 ! IV What happens in Guantanamo 8 ! V Discussion- Time to react 8 ! VII Bibliography 11 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! "3 av "17 Introduction Music as a phenomenon is universal to all humans and can be found in every human culture past and present.1 It has been used through history for pleasure, and for sorrow, in religion and everyday life alike.
  • A Review of the FBI's Involvement in and Observations of Detainee Interrogations in Guantanamo Bay, Mghanistan, and Iraq

    A Review of the FBI's Involvement in and Observations of Detainee Interrogations in Guantanamo Bay, Mghanistan, and Iraq

    Case 1:04-cv-04151-AKH Document 450-5 Filed 02/15/11 Page 1 of 21 EXHIBIT 4 Case 1:04-cv-04151-AKH Document 450-5 Filed 02/15/11 Page 2 of 21 U.S. Department ofJustice Office of the Inspector General A Review of the FBI's Involvement in and Observations of Detainee Interrogations in Guantanamo Bay, Mghanistan, and Iraq Oversight and Review Division Office of the Inspector General May 2008 UNCLASSIFIED Case 1:04-cv-04151-AKH Document 450-5 Filed 02/15/11 Page 3 of 21 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .i CHAPTER ONE: INTRODUCTION 1 I. Introduction l II. The OIG Investigation 2 III. Prior Reports Regarding Detainee Mistreatment 3 IV. Methodology of OIG Review of Knowledge of FBI Agents Regarding Detainee Treatment · 5 A. The OIG June 2005 Survey 5 B. OIG Selection of FBI Personnel for.Interviews 7 C. OIG Treatment of Military Conduct 7 V. Organization of the OIG Report 8 CHAPTER TWO: FACTUAL BACKGROUND 11 I. The Changing Role of the FBI After September 11 11 II. FBI Headquarters Organizational Structure for Military Zones 12 A. Counterterrorism Division 13 1. International Terrorism Operations Sections 13 2. Counterterrorism Operations Response Section 14 B. Critical Incident Response Group 15 C. Office of General Counsel. 15 III. Other DOJ Entities Involved in Overseas Detainee Matters 16 IV. Inter-Agency Entities and Agreements Relating to Detainee Matters. 16 A. The Policy Coordinating Committee 16 B. Inter-Agency Memorandums of Understanding 18 V. Background Regarding the FBI's Role in the Military Zones 19 A.
  • Who Is Shaker Aamer? Crt Briefing, 9 February 2015

    Who Is Shaker Aamer? Crt Briefing, 9 February 2015

    BRITAIN’S LAST GUANTÁNAMO DETAINEE: WHO IS SHAKER AAMER? CRT BRIEFING, 9 FEBRUARY 2015 INTRODUCTION It is UK government policy that Shaker Aamer, the last remaining British resident detained at Guantánamo Bay, be returned. In December 2014, newspaper stories emerged suggesting that this could soon be the case.1 At a meeting in Washington, DC, a month later, President Obama told Prime Minister David Cameron that the US would “prioritise” the case.2 Aamer, who was born in Saudi Arabia, was captured in Afghanistan in November 2001; he was sent to Guantánamo Bay in February 2002. The US government believes him to be a weapons-trained al- Qaeda fighter; Aamer’s supporters claim that he was in Afghanistan to carry out voluntary work for an Islamic charity.3 Aamer is thought to have been cleared for transfer to Saudi Arabia in June 2007 (although, as late as November 2007, Department of Defense documentation recommended that he continue to be 1 ‘Guantanamo to free last UK inmate’, The Sunday Times, 28 December 2014, available at: http://www.thesundaytimes.co.uk/sto/news/uk_news/National/article1500831.ece?CMP=OTH-gnws-standard-2014_12_27, last visited: 29 January 2015; see also: ‘Last British inmate at Guantanamo set to be freed in the new year in fresh push by Obama to empty prison’, Daily Mail, 28 December 2014, available at: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2888964/Last-British- inmate-Guantanamo-set-freed-new-year-fresh-push-Obama-prison.html, last visited: 29 January 2015. 2 ‘Barack Obama to “prioritise” case of Guantánamo detainee Shaker Aamer’, The Guardian, 16 January 2015, available at: http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2015/jan/16/shaker-aamer-guantanamo-bay-prioritise-obama-case, last visited: 29 January 2015.
  • The Oath a Film by Laura Poitras

    The Oath a Film by Laura Poitras

    The Oath A film by Laura Poitras POV www.pbs.org/pov DISCUSSION GUIDe The Oath POV Letter frOm the fiLmmakers New YorK , 2010 I was first interested in making a film about Guantanamo in 2003, when I was also beginning a film about the war in Iraq. I never imagined Guantanamo would still be open when I finished that film, but sadly it was — and still is today. originally, my idea for the Oath was to make a film about some - one released from Guantanamo and returning home. In May 2007, I traveled to Yemen looking to find that story and that’s when I met Abu Jandal, osama bin Laden’s former bodyguard, driving a taxicab in Sana’a, the capital of Yemen. I wasn’t look - ing to make a film about Al-Qaeda, but that changed when I met Abu Jandal. Themes of betrayal, guilt, loyalty, family and absence are not typically things that come to mind when we imagine a film about Al-Qaeda and Guantanamo. Despite the dangers of telling this story, it compelled me. Born in Saudi Arabia of Yemeni parents, Abu Jandal left home in 1993 to fight jihad in Bosnia. In 1996 he recruited Salim Ham - dan to join him for jihad in Tajikistan. while traveling through Laura Poitras, filmmaker of the Oath . Afghanistan, they were recruited by osama bin Laden. Abu Jan - Photo by Khalid Al Mahdi dal became bin Laden's personal bodyguard and “emir of Hos - pitality.” Salim Hamdan became bin Laden’s driver. Abu Jandal ends up driving a taxi and Hamdan ends up at Guantanamo.
  • Print: Bush's Plan to Erode Our Liberties

    Print: Bush's Plan to Erode Our Liberties

    Print: Bush's Plan to Erode Our Liberties http://www.thenation.com/doc/20070625/huq/print Bush's Plan to Erode Our Liberties by AZIZ HUQ June 8, 2007 Early this week, judge advocates halted two prosecutions in the Guantánamo military commissions established under the 2006 Military Commissions Act (MCA). This is not the first setback the Administration's second-tier court system has hit; the Supreme Court invalidated an earlier iteration of the commissions in 2006. And it won't be the last. But while this week's setback likely will be speedily surmounted, it casts an unexpected light on the MCA's real purposes, and what's at stake when the Bush Administration plays politics with national security. Understanding the significance of this week's ruling means delving into a bit of procedural arcana. The devil in the MCA is, almost literally, in the details--and unless we attend closely to the rococo details of the statute, we'll miss the ways in which the Administration intends to slowly erode our liberties. At the beginning of this week, the military commissions' two judges--Army Col. Peter Brownback and Navy Capt. Keith Allred--dismissed charges filed against Omar Khadr and Salim Hamdan. The rulings focused on a question of categorization--basically, the judges found that Khadr and Hamdan had been wrongly classified. But how did this happen? The MCA, which created the military commissions, states that only an alien who is an "unlawful enemy combatant" can be tried in a military commission. It also defines "unlawful enemy combatants" in tremendously sweeping terms to include anyone who has "materially supported hostilities." Many civil libertarians, including myself, expressed grave concerns about the scope of this provision.
  • Pakistan. Conference on Disappearances in Pakistan (Web

    Pakistan. Conference on Disappearances in Pakistan (Web

    WEB UPDATES – TACTICAL CAMPAIGN AGAINST TORTURE Name/Team Edurne Rubio/ TCT ext. 5515 Date 25/09/2006 Section Features AIDOC ASA 33/037/2006 Title Wanted: al-Qa’ida suspects. $5000 reward. Summary for torture homepage More than 85% of detainees at Guantánamo Bay were arrested by the Afghan Northern Alliance and in Pakistan at a time when rewards of up to $5,000 were paid for every “terrorist” handed over to the USA. Family members, lawyers and other activists are gathering in Islamabad, Pakistan (29 to 31 September) to inform and encourage action against Pakistan’s increasing use of arbitrary arrest, secret detention, torture and the failure of Pakistani courts to offer protection.. Feature The road to Guantánamo starts in Pakistan. More than 85 percent of detainees unlawfully held at the US detention centre in Cuba were arrested by the Afghan Northern Alliance and in Pakistan at a time when rewards of up to US$5,000 were paid for every unidentified terror suspect handed over to the USA. Bounty hunters – including police officers and local people – took advantage of this routine practice that facilitated illegal detention and enforced disappearance, almost unheard in Pakistan before the US-led “war on terror”. The Pakistani courts have failed to offer protection. Hundreds of Pakistani and foreign nationals have been picked up in mass arrests in Pakistan since 2001, many have been “sold” to the USA as ‘terrorists’ simply on the word of their captor, and hundreds have been transferred to Guantánamo Bay, Bagram Airbase or secret detention centres run by the USA.
  • Forming and Maintaining Productive Client Relations with Al Qaeda Members and Their Supporters

    Forming and Maintaining Productive Client Relations with Al Qaeda Members and Their Supporters

    FCDJ Volume V FORMING AND MAINTAINING PRODUCTIVE CLIENT RELATIONS WITH AL QAEDA MEMBERS AND THEIR SUPPORTERS 1 TRAVIS J. OWENS 1 This article is written in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the California Western School of Law L.L.M. in Trial Advocacy. My thanks to Professor Justin Brooks for his contributions to my writing process and to a host of attorneys and interpreters who provided their practical insights on the substance of this article. The author is a graduate of the University of Cincinnati College of Law (J.D.) and the Naval Postgraduate School (M.A. in Security Studies: Middle East, North Africa and South Asia.). He is a Lieutenant Commander in the United States Navy Judge Advocate General’s Corps. The views expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of the Department of Defense or the United States Navy. 50 FCDJ Volume V I. INTRODUCTION As a Federal Defender, you have just been assigned to the case of Ahmed Warsame, a Somalian general detained for two months on a ship by the United States, questioned by intelligence services, and now indicted in federal district court. The indictment alleges, among other things, that Mr. Warsame materially supported “Al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula.” As a defense attorney, you have represented a multitude of difficult clients - sexual predators, drug dealers with diagnosed mental disorders, and foreign nationals who speak no English and have never been in an American jail. You are respected for how you can win in court and for having brought clients to the table for deals that people thought could never be made.
  • Download the PDF File

    Download the PDF File

    S E C RE T //NOFORN I I 20310825 DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE JOINT TASK FORCE GUANTANAMO GUANTANAMO BAY, CI,IBA APO AE 09360 JTF-GTMO-CC 25 August2006 MEMORANDUM FOR Commander,United StatesSouthern Command, 3511 NW 9lst Avenue. Miami. FL33172 SUBJECT: Recommendationfor Continued Detention Under DoD Control (CD) for GuantanamoDetainee, ISN: US9SA-000230DP(S) JTF-GTMODetainee Assessment 1. (S/NF) PersonalInformation: o JDIMSAIDRC ReferenceName: Hamud Dakhil Hamud o Aliases and Current/True Name: Talut al-Jeddawi. Humud Dakhil Humud Said al-Jadani.Hamud Sultan.Nag Mohammad. Safwan the Afghan o Placeof Birth: Jeddah.Saudi Arabia (SA) o Dateof Birth: 22May 1973 o Citizenship: SaudiArabia o InternmentSerial Number (ISN): US9SA-000230DP 2. (FOUO) Health: Detaineeis in goodhealth. 3. (S//NF) JTF-GTMOAssessment: a. (S) Recommendation: JTF-GTMOrecommends this detaineefor Continued DetentionUnder DoD Control(CD). JTF-GTMOpreviously assessed detainee as Continued DetentionUnder DoD Control(CD) on 5 September2005. b. (S/NF) Executive Summary: Detaineeis assessedto be a memberof al-Qaidawith an extensivehistory of militantjihad. Detaineeis an admittedleader of armedfighters in ToraBora duringhostilities against US forcesand associated with severalsenior al-Qaida members.He receivedbasic and advanced training in Chechnyaand Afghanistan (AF) CLASSIFIEDBY: MULTIPLESOURCES REASON:E.O. 12958 SECTION 1.5(C) DECLASSIFYON: 203108 1 I S E C RE T // NOFORNI I 20310825 S E C R E T // NOFORNI I 20310825 JTF-GTMO-CC SUBJECT:Recommendation for ContinuedDetention Under DoD Control(CD) for GuantanamoDetainee, ISN: US9SA-000230DP (S) includingtraining on smallarns, explosives,mortars, and anti-aircraft weaponry. JTF- GTMO determinedthis detaineeto be: o A HIGH risk, as he is likely to posea threatto the US, its interestsand allies.
  • Moazzam Begg

    Moazzam Begg

    REPORT ONE THOUSAND DAYS AND NIGHTS OF TORTURE The Systematic Torture and Abuse of Moazzam Begg a British Citizen by the United States of America November 24, 2004 (Sexual Abuse I Mental Health Redacted) 000268 - -- --- --- TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Death, Torture by threats of .............................................. -1- a. Threats of summaryjudicial execution -1- b. Witnessing the murder of other prisoners -2- 1. The First Murder: Two MP's beat aY oung Afghan to death -2- 11. The SecondMurder:Aparticularly SadisticMPbeats anotherAfghan to death. .. -3- 2. Physical Torture (Torture in the First Degree) . .. -4- a. BeatingsofMr.Begg. ... ... ... .. ... .. .. -4- 1. Beating the Prisoner with Truncheons . .. -4- 11. Stomping on the Prisoner's the Feet -4- lll. Beating Mr. Begg about the head. .. -4- iv. Beating Mr. Begg about the ears (Telefono) -5- b. Kicking Mr. Begg -5- c. Cold / Hypothermia used as Physical Torture -5- d. Guns used to Threaten Mr. Begg's life -5- 1. Direct threats with guns . .. -5- 11. Direct threats with tasers -6- e. Stress & Duress Physical Abuse -6- 1. Duress Positions . .. -6- 11. The "Marching Position" -6- lll. The "Torture Position" -7- -1- 000269 - -- - ---- -- - - -- - -- f. Physical abuse by Shackling -7- 1. Shackling Generally . .. -7- 11. Suspension by Shackling .............................. -7- (1) TheAmerianvariationonthe ReverseStrappado. .. -7- (2) The American version of Strappado -8- 3. Torture by Rape & Sexual Abuse -8- 4. Threats of Rendition (Outsourcing Torture) -8- 5. Threats of Torture and Abuse (Second Degree Torture) -10- a. Threats against Mr. Begg's wife and children. .. -10- 1. ThreatsagainstMr.Begg'swife Sally. .. -10- 11. Threats against Mr. Begg's children -11- b.
  • No Torture. No Exceptions

    No Torture. No Exceptions

    NO TORTURE. NO EXCEPTIONS. The above sketch by Thomas V. Curtis, a former Reserve M.P. sergeant, is of New York Times an Afghan detainee, Dilawar, who was taken into U.S. custody on December 5, 2002, and died five days later. Dilawar was deprived of sleep and chained to the ceiling of his cell—techniques that the Bush administration has refused to outlaw for use by the CIA. Further, his legs were, according to a coroner, “pulpified” by repeated blows. Later evidence showed that Dilawar had no connection to the rocket attack for which he’d been apprehended. A sketch by Thomas Curtis, V. a Reserve M.P./The 16 January/February/March 2008 Introduction n most issues of the Washington Monthly, we favor ar- long-term psychological effects also haunt patients—panic ticles that we hope will launch a debate. In this issue attacks, depression, and symptoms of post-traumatic-stress Iwe seek to end one. The unifying message of the ar- disorder. It has long been prosecuted as a crime of war. In our ticles that follow is, simply, Stop. In the wake of Septem- view, it still should be. ber 11, the United States became a nation that practiced Ideally, the election in November would put an end to torture. Astonishingly—despite the repudiation of tor- this debate, but we fear it won’t. John McCain, who for so ture by experts and the revelations of Guantanamo and long was one of the leading Republican opponents of the Abu Ghraib—we remain one. As we go to press, President White House’s policy on torture, voted in February against George W.
  • The Value of Claiming Torture: an Analysis of Al-Qaeda's Tactical Lawfare Strategy and Efforts to Fight Back, 43 Case W

    The Value of Claiming Torture: an Analysis of Al-Qaeda's Tactical Lawfare Strategy and Efforts to Fight Back, 43 Case W

    Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law Volume 43 | Issue 1 2010 The alueV of Claiming Torture: An Analysis of Al- Qaeda's Tactical Lawfare Strategy and Efforts to Fight Back Michael J. Lebowitz Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.law.case.edu/jil Part of the International Law Commons Recommended Citation Michael J. Lebowitz, The Value of Claiming Torture: An Analysis of Al-Qaeda's Tactical Lawfare Strategy and Efforts to Fight Back, 43 Case W. Res. J. Int'l L. 357 (2010) Available at: https://scholarlycommons.law.case.edu/jil/vol43/iss1/22 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Journals at Case Western Reserve University School of Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law by an authorized administrator of Case Western Reserve University School of Law Scholarly Commons. File: Lebowitz 2 Created on: 1/9/2011 9:48:00 PM Last Printed: 4/5/2011 8:09:00 PM THE VALUE OF CLAIMING TORTURE: AN ANALYSIS OF AL-QAEDA’S TACTICAL LAWFARE STRATEGY AND EFFORTS TO FIGHT BACK Michael J. Lebowitz* I. INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................... 357 II. CLAIMING TORTURE TO SHAPE THE BATTLEFIELD .............................. 361 A. Tactical Lawfare ........................................................................... 362 B. Faux Torture ................................................................................. 364 C. The Torture Benchmark ...............................................................