STUDY of BRACHIALIS MUSCLE: ADDITIONAL SLIP and ITS CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE Jayakumar V R 1, Paramasivam V *2 , Roshni Bajpe 3
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Level Diagnosis of Cervical Compressive Myelopathy: Signs, Symptoms, and Lesions Levels
Elmer Press Original Article J Neurol Res • 2013;3(5):135-141 Level Diagnosis of Cervical Compressive Myelopathy: Signs, Symptoms, and Lesions Levels Naoki Kasahata ficult to accurately localize the lesion before radiographic Abstract diagnosis. However, neurological level diagnosis of spinal cord is important for accurate lesion-specific level diagnosis, Background: To elucidate signs and symptoms corresponding to patients’ treatment, avoiding diagnostic error, differential di- each vertebral level for level-specific diagnoses. agnosis, and especially for accurate level diagnosis of other nonsurgical myelopathies. Moreover, level diagnosis should Methods: We studied 106 patients with cervical compressive my- be considered from multiple viewpoints. Therefore, we in- elopathy. Patients who showed a single compressive site on mag- tend to make level diagnosis of myelopathy more accurate. netic resonance imaging (MRI) were selected, and signs, symp- Previously, lesion-specific level diagnoses by determin- toms, and the levels of the MRI lesions were studied. ing a sensory disturbance area or location of numbness in Results: Five of 12 patients (41.7%) with C4-5 intervertebral level the hands had the highest accuracy [1, 2]. Previous stud- lesions showed decreased or absent biceps and brachioradialis re- ies reported that C3-4 intervertebral level lesions showed flexes, while 4 of these patients (33.3%) showed generalized hyper- increased or decreased biceps reflexes, deltoid weakness, reflexia. In comparison, 5 of 24 patients (20.8%) with C5-6 inter- and sensory disturbance of arms or forearms [1, 3, 4], while vertebral level lesions showed decreased or absent triceps reflexes; C4-5 intervertebral level lesions showed decreased biceps however, 9 of these patients (37.5%) showed decreased or absent reflexes, biceps weakness, and sensory disturbance of hands biceps and brachioradialis reflexes. -
Morphology of Extensor Indicis Proprius Muscle in the North Indian Region: an Anatomy Section Anatomic Study with Ontogenic and Phylogenetic Perspective
DOI: 10.7860/IJARS/2019/41047:2477 Original Article Morphology of Extensor Indicis Proprius Muscle in the North Indian Region: An Anatomy Section Anatomic Study with Ontogenic and Phylogenetic Perspective MEENAKSHI KHULLAR1, SHERRY SHARMA2 ABSTRACT to the index finger were noted and appropriate photographs Introduction: Variants on muscles and tendons of the forearm were taken. or hand occur frequently in human beings. They are often Results: In two limbs, the EIP muscle was altogether absent. discovered during routine educational cadaveric dissections In all the remaining 58 limbs, the origin of EIP was from the and surgical procedures. posterior surface of the distal third of the ulnar shaft. Out of Aim: To observe any variation of Extensor Indicis Proprius (EIP) these 58 limbs, this muscle had a single tendon of insertion in 52 muscle and to document any accessory muscles or tendons limbs, whereas in the remaining six limbs it had two tendinous related to the index finger. slips with different insertions. Materials and Methods: The EIP muscle was dissected in 60 Conclusion: Knowledge of the various normal as well as upper limb specimens. After reflection of the skin and superficial anomalous tendons on the dorsal aspect of the hand is fascia from the back of the forearm and hand, the extensor necessary for evaluating an injured or diseased hand and also at retinaculum was divided longitudinally and the dorsum of the the time of tendon repair or transfer. Awareness of such variants hand was diligently dissected. The extensor tendons were becomes significant in surgeries in order to avoid damage to the delineated and followed to their insertions. -
Anatomic Variations in Relation to the Origin of the Musculocutaneous Nerve: Absence and Non-Perforation of the Coracobrachialis Muscle
Int. J. Morphol., 36(2):425-429, 2018. Anatomic Variations in Relation to the Origin of the Musculocutaneous Nerve: Absence and Non-Perforation of the Coracobrachialis Muscle. Anatomical Study and Clinical Significance Variaciones Anatómicas en Relación al Origen del Nervio Musculocutáneo: Ausencia y no Perforación del Músculo Coracobraquial: Estudio Anatómico y Significado Clínico Daniel Raúl Ballesteros Larrotta1; Pedro Luis Forero Porras2 & Luis Ernesto Ballesteros Acuña1 BALLESTEROS, D. R.; FORERO, P. L. & BALLESTEROS, L. E. Anatomic variations in relation to the origin of the musculocutaneous nerve: Absence and non-perforation of the coracobrachialis muscle. Anatomical study and clinical significance. Int. J. Morphol., 36(2):425- 429, 2018. SUMMARY: The most frequent anatomic variations of the musculocutaneous nerve could be divided in two main groups: communicating branches with the median nerve and variations in relation to the origin, which in turn can be subdivided into absence of the nerve and non-perforation of the coracobrachialis muscle. Unusual clinical symptoms and/or unusual physical examination in patients with motor disorders, could be explained by anatomic variations of the musculocutaneous nerve. A total of 106 arms were evaluated, corresponding to 53 fresh male cadavers who were undergoing necropsy. The presence or absence of the musculocutaneous nerve was evaluated and whether it pierced the coracobrachialis muscle or not. The lengths of the motor branches and the distances from its origins to the coracoid process were measured. In 10 cases (9.5 %) an unusual origin pattern was observed, of which six (5.7 %) correspond to non-perforation of the coracobrachialis muscle and four (3.8 %) correspond to absence of the nerve. -
The Branching and Innervation Pattern of the Radial Nerve in the Forearm: Clarifying the Literature and Understanding Variations and Their Clinical Implications
diagnostics Article The Branching and Innervation Pattern of the Radial Nerve in the Forearm: Clarifying the Literature and Understanding Variations and Their Clinical Implications F. Kip Sawyer 1,2,* , Joshua J. Stefanik 3 and Rebecca S. Lufler 1 1 Department of Medical Education, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA 02111, USA; rebecca.lufl[email protected] 2 Department of Anesthesiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA 3 Department of Physical Therapy, Movement and Rehabilitation Science, Bouve College of Health Sciences, Northeastern University, Boston, MA 02115, USA; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 20 May 2020; Accepted: 29 May 2020; Published: 2 June 2020 Abstract: Background: This study attempted to clarify the innervation pattern of the muscles of the distal arm and posterior forearm through cadaveric dissection. Methods: Thirty-five cadavers were dissected to expose the radial nerve in the forearm. Each muscular branch of the nerve was identified and their length and distance along the nerve were recorded. These values were used to determine the typical branching and motor entry orders. Results: The typical branching order was brachialis, brachioradialis, extensor carpi radialis longus, extensor carpi radialis brevis, supinator, extensor digitorum, extensor carpi ulnaris, abductor pollicis longus, extensor digiti minimi, extensor pollicis brevis, extensor pollicis longus and extensor indicis. Notably, the radial nerve often innervated brachialis (60%), and its superficial branch often innervated extensor carpi radialis brevis (25.7%). Conclusions: The radial nerve exhibits significant variability in the posterior forearm. However, there is enough consistency to identify an archetypal pattern and order of innervation. These findings may also need to be considered when planning surgical approaches to the distal arm, elbow and proximal forearm to prevent an undue loss of motor function. -
Articulationes Membri Thoracici • 1. Articulatio
ARTICULATIONES MEMBRI THORACICI • 1. ARTICULATIO HUMERI-art. simplex, art. spheroidea (but functions as a hinge joint) movement: eq, Ru only flexion, extension is possible, in ca: rotation, abduction, adduction also between scapula (cavitas glenoidalis) and humerus (caput) Capsula articularis Recessus: cranial and caudal recesses Labrum glenoidale Ligg. glenohumeralia (eq, ca)- tickened part of the capsule (capsular ligament) in the med. and lat. walls in ca, and cranially in eq Lig. coracohumerale (eq, Ru)- capsular ligament between scapula (tub. supraglenoidale) and humerus (tub. majus, minus) No collateral ligaments! Instead of them: laterally m. infraspinatus (1), medially m. subscapularis (5) ca: part of the joint capsule surrounds the tendon of m. biceps brachii (9) and forms vagina synovialis intertubercularis eq, bo: bursa intertubercularis (=bursa bicipitalis) under the tendor of the m. biceps brachii (may communicate with the joint cavity of the shoulder joint in horse) • 2.ARTICULATIO CUBITI-art. composita, ginglymus (hinge joint) movement: extension and flexion between humerus (condyle), radius (caput), ulna (insisura trochlearis) Articulatio humeroulnaris Articulatio humeroradialis Capsula articularis Recessus: recessus cranialis, large recessus caudalis Lig. collaterale cubiti mediale- from epicondylus med. to radius (in ca also to ulna) Lig. collaterale cubiti laterale- from epicondylus lat. to radius (in ca, Ru also to ulna) Lig. olecrani (ca)- capsular ligament from fossa olecrani of humerus to olecranon •3. ARTICULATIO RADIOULNARIS PROXIMALIS- art. simplex, art. trochoidea movement: ca: rotational movements are possible (pronatio, supinatio) eq, Ru: no movement! between radius (circumferentia articularis radii) and ulna (incisura radialis ulnae) Lig. anulare radii (ca)- encircles the head of the radius, running under the collateral ligaments Membrana interossea antebrachii (ca) (in eq, Ru it is ossified) • 4. -
Anatomical, Clinical, and Electrodiagnostic Features of Radial Neuropathies
Anatomical, Clinical, and Electrodiagnostic Features of Radial Neuropathies a, b Leo H. Wang, MD, PhD *, Michael D. Weiss, MD KEYWORDS Radial Posterior interosseous Neuropathy Electrodiagnostic study KEY POINTS The radial nerve subserves the extensor compartment of the arm. Radial nerve lesions are common because of the length and winding course of the nerve. The radial nerve is in direct contact with bone at the midpoint and distal third of the humerus, and therefore most vulnerable to compression or contusion from fractures. Electrodiagnostic studies are useful to localize and characterize the injury as axonal or demyelinating. Radial neuropathies at the midhumeral shaft tend to have good prognosis. INTRODUCTION The radial nerve is the principal nerve in the upper extremity that subserves the extensor compartments of the arm. It has a long and winding course rendering it vulnerable to injury. Radial neuropathies are commonly a consequence of acute trau- matic injury and only rarely caused by entrapment in the absence of such an injury. This article reviews the anatomy of the radial nerve, common sites of injury and their presentation, and the electrodiagnostic approach to localizing the lesion. ANATOMY OF THE RADIAL NERVE Course of the Radial Nerve The radial nerve subserves the extensors of the arms and fingers and the sensory nerves of the extensor surface of the arm.1–3 Because it serves the sensory and motor Disclosures: Dr Wang has no relevant disclosures. Dr Weiss is a consultant for CSL-Behring and a speaker for Grifols Inc. and Walgreens. He has research support from the Northeast ALS Consortium and ALS Therapy Alliance. -
Unusual Cubital Fossa Anatomy – Case Report
Anatomy Journal of Africa 2 (1): 80-83 (2013) Case Report UNUSUAL CUBITAL FOSSA ANATOMY – CASE REPORT Surekha D Shetty, Satheesha Nayak B, Naveen Kumar, Anitha Guru. Correspondence: Dr. Satheesha Nayak B, Department of Anatomy, Melaka Manipal Medical College (Manipal Campus), Manipal University, Madhav Nagar, Manipal, Karnataka State, India. 576104 Email: [email protected] SUMMARY The median nerve is known to show variations in its origin, course, relations and distribution. But in almost all cases it passes through the cubital fossa. We saw a cubital fossa without a median nerve. The median nerve had a normal course in the upper part of front of the arm but in the distal third of the arm it passed in front of the medial epicondyle of humerus, surrounded by fleshy fibres of pronator teres muscle. Its course and distribution in the forearm was normal. In the same limb, the fleshy fibres of the brachialis muscle directly continued into the forearm as brachioradialis, there being no fibrous septum separating the two muscles from each other. The close relationship of the nerve to the epicondyle might make it vulnerable in the fractures of the epicondyle. The muscle fibres surrounding the nerve might pull up on the nerve and result in altered sensory-motor functions of the hand. Since the brachialis and brachioradialis are two muscles supplied by two different nerves, this continuity of the muscles might result in compression/entrapment of the radial nerve in it. Key words: Median nerve, cubital fossa, brachialis, brachioradialis, entrapment INTRODUCTION The median nerve is the main content of and broad tendon which is inserted into the cubital fossa along with brachial artery and ulnar tuberosity and to a rough surface on the biceps brachii tendon. -
M1 – Muscled Arm
M1 – Muscled Arm See diagram on next page 1. tendinous junction 38. brachial artery 2. dorsal interosseous muscles of hand 39. humerus 3. radial nerve 40. lateral epicondyle of humerus 4. radial artery 41. tendon of flexor carpi radialis muscle 5. extensor retinaculum 42. median nerve 6. abductor pollicis brevis muscle 43. flexor retinaculum 7. extensor carpi radialis brevis muscle 44. tendon of palmaris longus muscle 8. extensor carpi radialis longus muscle 45. common palmar digital nerves of 9. brachioradialis muscle median nerve 10. brachialis muscle 46. flexor pollicis brevis muscle 11. deltoid muscle 47. adductor pollicis muscle 12. supraspinatus muscle 48. lumbrical muscles of hand 13. scapular spine 49. tendon of flexor digitorium 14. trapezius muscle superficialis muscle 15. infraspinatus muscle 50. superficial transverse metacarpal 16. latissimus dorsi muscle ligament 17. teres major muscle 51. common palmar digital arteries 18. teres minor muscle 52. digital synovial sheath 19. triangular space 53. tendon of flexor digitorum profundus 20. long head of triceps brachii muscle muscle 21. lateral head of triceps brachii muscle 54. annular part of fibrous tendon 22. tendon of triceps brachii muscle sheaths 23. ulnar nerve 55. proper palmar digital nerves of ulnar 24. anconeus muscle nerve 25. medial epicondyle of humerus 56. cruciform part of fibrous tendon 26. olecranon process of ulna sheaths 27. flexor carpi ulnaris muscle 57. superficial palmar arch 28. extensor digitorum muscle of hand 58. abductor digiti minimi muscle of hand 29. extensor carpi ulnaris muscle 59. opponens digiti minimi muscle of 30. tendon of extensor digitorium muscle hand of hand 60. superficial branch of ulnar nerve 31. -
Coracobrachialis Muscle Pierced by Two Nerves: Case Report
Case Report www.anatomy.org.tr Received: April 6, 2016; Accepted: June 13, 2016 doi:10.2399/ana.16.008 Coracobrachialis muscle pierced by two nerves: case report Dawit Habte Woldeyes, Belta Asnakew Abegaz Department of Human Anatomy, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Bahir Dar University, Bahir Dar, Ethiopia Abstract The brachial plexus is formed by the union of the ventral rami of C5–T1. Contributions to the plexus by C4 and T2 differ. The coracobrachialis muscle is an elongated muscle in the superomedial part of the arm. It is a useful landmark for locating other structures in the arm. Variations exist to the coracobrachialis muscle, and to the formation of the brachial plexus, its terminal branches and its relation to surrounding structures. In this report, the coracobrachialis muscle is pierced by two nerves, and one of these nerves joins the median nerve after piercing the coracobrachialis muscle. Awareness of the possible variations of brachial plexus and its surrounding structures is necessary for adequate clinical, surgical and radiological management. Keywords: brachial plexus; coracobrachialis; median nerve; musculocutaneous nerve; unnamed nerve Anatomy 2016;10(2):148–152 ©2016 Turkish Society of Anatomy and Clinical Anatomy (TSACA) Introduction locating other structures in the arm; i.e., the musculocu- taneous nerve pierces it, and the distal part of its attach- The brachial plexus is formed by the union of the ventral ment indicates the location of the nutrient foramen of rami of C5–T1. The most common arrangement of the the humerus.[6,7] brachial plexus is as follows: the fifth and sixth rami unite as the upper trunk, the eighth cervical and first thoracic Variations in the formation of the brachial plexus and its terminal branches in the upper extremity are rami join as the lower trunk, the seventh cervical ramus [1] becomes the middle trunk. -
Arm and Cubital Fossa
Two Minute History M1 - Anatomy Dissection: • 300 B.C Arm and Cubital Alexandrian Egypt: King Ptolemy I, its ok Fossa to dissect cadavers of executed, mummies etc… •Herophilus “Father of Anatomy” accused by a rival of DG Simpson, Ph.D. dissecting 600 criminals…..live criminals VCU Department of Anatomy •1300 AD Europe Pope Boniface VIII edict to stop dissection to reduce the flow of bodies “parted out and boiled” from the crusades. Unclear if this is broad ban or very narrow. 1 2 Dissection: Dissection: •1540 parliament passes “The United Company of Barbers and •1700’s with the expansion of medical Surgeons, dissect 4-6 executed schools cadavers are used as tuition criminals/yr (not enough even then) •Competition is very high and medical •1600’s Britain. The executed are schools actively advertise that training includes dissections etc.. dissected in public as punishment • 1628 William Harvey •1828 London had 10 full time (cardiovascular fame). Autopsy & 200 part time body snatchers (“seasonal work” at 312 bodies/yr) of live and dead…. Medicine expands and shortages develop •Inventions to foil grave robbers Harvey dissects father and sister •1828 Robert Knox….and the rest • 1740’s Lots of private medical is amazing history. schools competing for students, William Hogarth The Reward of Cruelty 3 4 market forces develop 1750-1751 Dissection: •Burke was hanged: 25,000 watched. Hare was granted immunity as crowd called “Burke Hare” •1828, knock on the •Burke dissected: 30,000 came to see the open lab door, Knox’s assistant purchases a cadaver -
The Elbow and Radioulnar Joints
6/5/2017 The Elbow and Radioulnar Joints Bones Humerus trochlea of the humerus capitulum: spherical knob on lateral side medial and lateral epicondyle Ulnar Trochlear notch of ulna Olecranon Process on posterior aspect radial notch coronoid process ulnar tuberosity Radius Head radial tuberosity The Elbow Joint Classified as a ginglymus (hinge) joint The ELBOW consists of 2 joints: humeroulnar olecranon process of the ulnar distal aspect of humerus radiohumeral radial head has small amount of articulation with humerus (capitulum) 1 6/5/2017 Proximal Radioulnar Joint Proximal radioulnar joint articulation between radius and ulnar not part of “hinge” joint trochoid (pivot) joint allows for forearm pronation/supination Movements Elbow Flexion Extension Forearm movements about the Proximal Radioulnar joint Supination: Lateral rotation Pronation: Medial Rotation Muscles Anterior Posterior Biceps brachii Triceps brachii Brachialis Anconeus Brachioradialis Supinator Pronator teres Pronator quadratus 2 6/5/2017 Muscles Elbow Flexors biceps brachii brachialis brachioradialis pronator teres Muscles Elbow Extensors triceps brachii anconeus Forearm Pronators pronator teres pronator quadratus brachioradialis* Muscles Forarm Supinators supinator biceps brachii brachioradialis* 3 6/5/2017 Anconeus (p56) Origin posterior surface of lateral epicondyle of humerus Insertion ulna, posterior surface of olecranon process Action elbow extension Biceps Brachii (p 57) Origin: long head: supraglenoid tubercle -
Human Motion Kinetics Homework #4 1. Assume That a Person Is Lifting A
ME 577 – Human Motion Kinetics Homework #4 1. Assume that a person is lifting a weight in a quasi-static manner using the muscles shown in the diagram below. The hand holds a 15 kg mass a distance of 30 cm (the length of the forearm) from the elbow joint. The forearm weighs 15 N. 1a. For the single force – no moment model, determine the muscle load (and joint contact forces) if we assume only the biceps is acting. Then, assume only the brachialis is acting. Then, assume only the brachioradialus is acting. 1c. Determine the muscle forces for the multi-force-no moment model (assume each muscle develops the same stress). This is a common technique for solving these kinds of problems, but not necessarily the best one. Also calculate the joint contact forces. Which model yields the lowest joint contact forces? Adapted from Orthopaedic Biomechanics by Mow and Hayes. 2 Muscle Angle θ (degrees) Moment Arm (cm) PCSA (cm ) Biceps brachii (BIC) 80.3 4.6 4.6 Brachialis (BRA) 68.7 3.4 7.0 Brachioradialis (BRR) 23.0 3.0 1.5 PCSA = Physiological Cross-Sectional Area 2. Repeat the problem above (only for the SFNM model of the biceps muscle) assuming that the elbow makes an angle of φ = πt2/2 – π/4. At what time will the forearm be horizontal? At that time, determine the force in the biceps muscle assuming it acts alone. 3. A weight lifter starts with his hands at his sides and raises his arms 90o in T=1 second, π ⎛ ⎛ πt ⎞ ⎞ θ(t) = 1− cos ⎜ ⎝⎜ ⎠⎟ ⎟ 4 ⎝ T ⎠ .