Morphology of Extensor Indicis Proprius Muscle in the North Indian Region: an Anatomy Section Anatomic Study with Ontogenic and Phylogenetic Perspective
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Juncturae Ossium Membri Superioris) Rndr
SPECIAL ARTHROLOGY Connections of the upper limb (juncturae ossium membri superioris) RNDr. Michaela Račanská, Ph.D. Lecture 8 – DENTISTRY – Autumn 2016 Connections of the shoulder girdle: scapula + clavicle – art. acromioclavicularis clavicle + sternum – art. sternoclavicularis Syndesmoses of the shoulder blade Connections of the free upper limb: Humerus + scapula – art. humeri Humerus + radius + ulna – art. cubiti Radius + ulna – membrana interossea antebrachii – art. radioulnaris distalis Radius + carpal bones– art. radiocarpea Carpal bones – art. mediocarpea carpal + metacarpal bones– art. carpometacarpea Metacarpal bones + phalanges proximales – art. metacarpophalangea Phalanges – art. interphalangea manus I. Articulatio sternoclavicularis Type: compound joint- discus articularis ball and socket (movements in connection to the scapula movements) A. head: facies articularis sternalis claviculae A. fossa: incisura clavicularis manubrii sterni AC: tough, short Ligaments: lig. sternoclaviculare anterius lig. sternoclaviculare posterius lig. interclaviculare lig. costoclaviculare Movements: small, to all direction II. Articulatio acromioclavicularis Type: ball and socket, sometimes discus articularis AS: facies art. acromialis (clavicula) + facies art. acromii (scapula) AC: tough, short ligaments: lig. acromioclaviculare lig. coracoclaviculare (lig. trapezoideum + lig. conoideum) lig. coracoacromiale - fornix humeri lig. transversum scapulae movements: restricted, in connections with movements in sternoclavicular joint Syndesmoses of the -
Level Diagnosis of Cervical Compressive Myelopathy: Signs, Symptoms, and Lesions Levels
Elmer Press Original Article J Neurol Res • 2013;3(5):135-141 Level Diagnosis of Cervical Compressive Myelopathy: Signs, Symptoms, and Lesions Levels Naoki Kasahata ficult to accurately localize the lesion before radiographic Abstract diagnosis. However, neurological level diagnosis of spinal cord is important for accurate lesion-specific level diagnosis, Background: To elucidate signs and symptoms corresponding to patients’ treatment, avoiding diagnostic error, differential di- each vertebral level for level-specific diagnoses. agnosis, and especially for accurate level diagnosis of other nonsurgical myelopathies. Moreover, level diagnosis should Methods: We studied 106 patients with cervical compressive my- be considered from multiple viewpoints. Therefore, we in- elopathy. Patients who showed a single compressive site on mag- tend to make level diagnosis of myelopathy more accurate. netic resonance imaging (MRI) were selected, and signs, symp- Previously, lesion-specific level diagnoses by determin- toms, and the levels of the MRI lesions were studied. ing a sensory disturbance area or location of numbness in Results: Five of 12 patients (41.7%) with C4-5 intervertebral level the hands had the highest accuracy [1, 2]. Previous stud- lesions showed decreased or absent biceps and brachioradialis re- ies reported that C3-4 intervertebral level lesions showed flexes, while 4 of these patients (33.3%) showed generalized hyper- increased or decreased biceps reflexes, deltoid weakness, reflexia. In comparison, 5 of 24 patients (20.8%) with C5-6 inter- and sensory disturbance of arms or forearms [1, 3, 4], while vertebral level lesions showed decreased or absent triceps reflexes; C4-5 intervertebral level lesions showed decreased biceps however, 9 of these patients (37.5%) showed decreased or absent reflexes, biceps weakness, and sensory disturbance of hands biceps and brachioradialis reflexes. -
The Branching and Innervation Pattern of the Radial Nerve in the Forearm: Clarifying the Literature and Understanding Variations and Their Clinical Implications
diagnostics Article The Branching and Innervation Pattern of the Radial Nerve in the Forearm: Clarifying the Literature and Understanding Variations and Their Clinical Implications F. Kip Sawyer 1,2,* , Joshua J. Stefanik 3 and Rebecca S. Lufler 1 1 Department of Medical Education, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA 02111, USA; rebecca.lufl[email protected] 2 Department of Anesthesiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA 3 Department of Physical Therapy, Movement and Rehabilitation Science, Bouve College of Health Sciences, Northeastern University, Boston, MA 02115, USA; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 20 May 2020; Accepted: 29 May 2020; Published: 2 June 2020 Abstract: Background: This study attempted to clarify the innervation pattern of the muscles of the distal arm and posterior forearm through cadaveric dissection. Methods: Thirty-five cadavers were dissected to expose the radial nerve in the forearm. Each muscular branch of the nerve was identified and their length and distance along the nerve were recorded. These values were used to determine the typical branching and motor entry orders. Results: The typical branching order was brachialis, brachioradialis, extensor carpi radialis longus, extensor carpi radialis brevis, supinator, extensor digitorum, extensor carpi ulnaris, abductor pollicis longus, extensor digiti minimi, extensor pollicis brevis, extensor pollicis longus and extensor indicis. Notably, the radial nerve often innervated brachialis (60%), and its superficial branch often innervated extensor carpi radialis brevis (25.7%). Conclusions: The radial nerve exhibits significant variability in the posterior forearm. However, there is enough consistency to identify an archetypal pattern and order of innervation. These findings may also need to be considered when planning surgical approaches to the distal arm, elbow and proximal forearm to prevent an undue loss of motor function. -
Articulationes Membri Thoracici • 1. Articulatio
ARTICULATIONES MEMBRI THORACICI • 1. ARTICULATIO HUMERI-art. simplex, art. spheroidea (but functions as a hinge joint) movement: eq, Ru only flexion, extension is possible, in ca: rotation, abduction, adduction also between scapula (cavitas glenoidalis) and humerus (caput) Capsula articularis Recessus: cranial and caudal recesses Labrum glenoidale Ligg. glenohumeralia (eq, ca)- tickened part of the capsule (capsular ligament) in the med. and lat. walls in ca, and cranially in eq Lig. coracohumerale (eq, Ru)- capsular ligament between scapula (tub. supraglenoidale) and humerus (tub. majus, minus) No collateral ligaments! Instead of them: laterally m. infraspinatus (1), medially m. subscapularis (5) ca: part of the joint capsule surrounds the tendon of m. biceps brachii (9) and forms vagina synovialis intertubercularis eq, bo: bursa intertubercularis (=bursa bicipitalis) under the tendor of the m. biceps brachii (may communicate with the joint cavity of the shoulder joint in horse) • 2.ARTICULATIO CUBITI-art. composita, ginglymus (hinge joint) movement: extension and flexion between humerus (condyle), radius (caput), ulna (insisura trochlearis) Articulatio humeroulnaris Articulatio humeroradialis Capsula articularis Recessus: recessus cranialis, large recessus caudalis Lig. collaterale cubiti mediale- from epicondylus med. to radius (in ca also to ulna) Lig. collaterale cubiti laterale- from epicondylus lat. to radius (in ca, Ru also to ulna) Lig. olecrani (ca)- capsular ligament from fossa olecrani of humerus to olecranon •3. ARTICULATIO RADIOULNARIS PROXIMALIS- art. simplex, art. trochoidea movement: ca: rotational movements are possible (pronatio, supinatio) eq, Ru: no movement! between radius (circumferentia articularis radii) and ulna (incisura radialis ulnae) Lig. anulare radii (ca)- encircles the head of the radius, running under the collateral ligaments Membrana interossea antebrachii (ca) (in eq, Ru it is ossified) • 4. -
Ligamentous Reconstruction of the Interosseous Membrane
r e v b r a s o r t o p . 2 0 1 8;5 3(2):184–191 SOCIEDADE BRASILEIRA DE ORTOPEDIA E TRAUMATOLOGIA www.rbo.org.br Original Article Ligamentous reconstruction of the interosseous membrane of the forearm in the treatment of ଝ instability of the distal radioulnar joint a a,∗ a Márcio Aurélio Aita , Ricardo Carvalho Mallozi , Willian Ozaki , a b Douglas Hideo Ikeuti , Daniel Alexandre Pereira Consoni , c Gustavo Mantovanni Ruggiero a Faculdade de Medicina do ABC, Santo André, SP, Brazil b Universidade da Cidade de São Paulo (Unicid), Faculdade de Medicina, Santo André, SP, Brazil c Università degli Studi di Milano, Milão, Italy a r a t i c l e i n f o b s t r a c t Article history: Objectives: To measure the quality of life and clinical outcomes of patients treated with Received 29 September 2016 interosseous membrane (IOM) ligament reconstruction of the forearm, using the brachio- Accepted 2 December 2016 radialis (BR), and describe a new surgical technique for the treatment of joint instability of Available online 23 February 2018 the distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ). Methods: From January 2013 to September 2016, 24 patients with longitudinal injury of the Keywords: distal radioulnar joint DRUJ were submitted to surgical treatment with a reconstruction procedure of the distal portion of the interosseous membrane or distal oblique band (DOB). Forearm injuries/surgery Joint range of motion The clinical-functional and radiographic parameters were analyzed and complications and Joint instability time of return to work were described. ◦ Membranes/injuries Results: The follow-up time was 20 months (6–36). -
Anatomical, Clinical, and Electrodiagnostic Features of Radial Neuropathies
Anatomical, Clinical, and Electrodiagnostic Features of Radial Neuropathies a, b Leo H. Wang, MD, PhD *, Michael D. Weiss, MD KEYWORDS Radial Posterior interosseous Neuropathy Electrodiagnostic study KEY POINTS The radial nerve subserves the extensor compartment of the arm. Radial nerve lesions are common because of the length and winding course of the nerve. The radial nerve is in direct contact with bone at the midpoint and distal third of the humerus, and therefore most vulnerable to compression or contusion from fractures. Electrodiagnostic studies are useful to localize and characterize the injury as axonal or demyelinating. Radial neuropathies at the midhumeral shaft tend to have good prognosis. INTRODUCTION The radial nerve is the principal nerve in the upper extremity that subserves the extensor compartments of the arm. It has a long and winding course rendering it vulnerable to injury. Radial neuropathies are commonly a consequence of acute trau- matic injury and only rarely caused by entrapment in the absence of such an injury. This article reviews the anatomy of the radial nerve, common sites of injury and their presentation, and the electrodiagnostic approach to localizing the lesion. ANATOMY OF THE RADIAL NERVE Course of the Radial Nerve The radial nerve subserves the extensors of the arms and fingers and the sensory nerves of the extensor surface of the arm.1–3 Because it serves the sensory and motor Disclosures: Dr Wang has no relevant disclosures. Dr Weiss is a consultant for CSL-Behring and a speaker for Grifols Inc. and Walgreens. He has research support from the Northeast ALS Consortium and ALS Therapy Alliance. -
Unusual Cubital Fossa Anatomy – Case Report
Anatomy Journal of Africa 2 (1): 80-83 (2013) Case Report UNUSUAL CUBITAL FOSSA ANATOMY – CASE REPORT Surekha D Shetty, Satheesha Nayak B, Naveen Kumar, Anitha Guru. Correspondence: Dr. Satheesha Nayak B, Department of Anatomy, Melaka Manipal Medical College (Manipal Campus), Manipal University, Madhav Nagar, Manipal, Karnataka State, India. 576104 Email: [email protected] SUMMARY The median nerve is known to show variations in its origin, course, relations and distribution. But in almost all cases it passes through the cubital fossa. We saw a cubital fossa without a median nerve. The median nerve had a normal course in the upper part of front of the arm but in the distal third of the arm it passed in front of the medial epicondyle of humerus, surrounded by fleshy fibres of pronator teres muscle. Its course and distribution in the forearm was normal. In the same limb, the fleshy fibres of the brachialis muscle directly continued into the forearm as brachioradialis, there being no fibrous septum separating the two muscles from each other. The close relationship of the nerve to the epicondyle might make it vulnerable in the fractures of the epicondyle. The muscle fibres surrounding the nerve might pull up on the nerve and result in altered sensory-motor functions of the hand. Since the brachialis and brachioradialis are two muscles supplied by two different nerves, this continuity of the muscles might result in compression/entrapment of the radial nerve in it. Key words: Median nerve, cubital fossa, brachialis, brachioradialis, entrapment INTRODUCTION The median nerve is the main content of and broad tendon which is inserted into the cubital fossa along with brachial artery and ulnar tuberosity and to a rough surface on the biceps brachii tendon. -
M1 – Muscled Arm
M1 – Muscled Arm See diagram on next page 1. tendinous junction 38. brachial artery 2. dorsal interosseous muscles of hand 39. humerus 3. radial nerve 40. lateral epicondyle of humerus 4. radial artery 41. tendon of flexor carpi radialis muscle 5. extensor retinaculum 42. median nerve 6. abductor pollicis brevis muscle 43. flexor retinaculum 7. extensor carpi radialis brevis muscle 44. tendon of palmaris longus muscle 8. extensor carpi radialis longus muscle 45. common palmar digital nerves of 9. brachioradialis muscle median nerve 10. brachialis muscle 46. flexor pollicis brevis muscle 11. deltoid muscle 47. adductor pollicis muscle 12. supraspinatus muscle 48. lumbrical muscles of hand 13. scapular spine 49. tendon of flexor digitorium 14. trapezius muscle superficialis muscle 15. infraspinatus muscle 50. superficial transverse metacarpal 16. latissimus dorsi muscle ligament 17. teres major muscle 51. common palmar digital arteries 18. teres minor muscle 52. digital synovial sheath 19. triangular space 53. tendon of flexor digitorum profundus 20. long head of triceps brachii muscle muscle 21. lateral head of triceps brachii muscle 54. annular part of fibrous tendon 22. tendon of triceps brachii muscle sheaths 23. ulnar nerve 55. proper palmar digital nerves of ulnar 24. anconeus muscle nerve 25. medial epicondyle of humerus 56. cruciform part of fibrous tendon 26. olecranon process of ulna sheaths 27. flexor carpi ulnaris muscle 57. superficial palmar arch 28. extensor digitorum muscle of hand 58. abductor digiti minimi muscle of hand 29. extensor carpi ulnaris muscle 59. opponens digiti minimi muscle of 30. tendon of extensor digitorium muscle hand of hand 60. superficial branch of ulnar nerve 31. -
S. CAVDAR and U. SEHIRLI the Extensor Indicis (Proprius)
Okajimas Folia Anat. Jpn. , 73(2-3): 139-142, August, 1996 The Accessory Tendon of the Extensor Indicis Muscle By S. CAVDAR and U. SEHIRLI Marmara University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Anatomy, Haydarpasa 81326, Istanbul-Turkiye -Received for Publication, August 9, 1995- Key Words: Accessory tendon, Extensor Indicis Muscle, Variation Summary: The extensor indicis and the extensor pollicis longus muscles differentiates from the extensor digitorum profundus muscle. The extensor indicis musde is an unstable muscle concerning its variations. Kosugi (1989) found the frequency of variations of this muscle to be 20% and described 18 different types of variations of this muscle. This study describes a rare case of the extensor indicis muscle. The extensor indicis muscle develops an accessory tendon in between the extensor indicis and extensor pollicis longus muscle. It passes under the extensor retinaculum. At the level of 2nd metacarpal bone, the accessory extensor indicis tendon is connected to the tendon of the extensor pollicis longus muscle by a intertendinous connection. The extensor indicis (proprius) is a narrow quadrupeds have been classified by Straus (1941) elongated muscle located in the deep extensor group into three groups. of the forearm. It arises from the posterior surface of 1. Brachio-antebrachial group the ulna distal to the extensor pollicis longus and 2. Antebrachio-manual group from the interosseus membrane. Its tendon passes 3. Manual group under the extensor retinaculum in company with the The brachio-antebrachial group basically takes its tendons of extensor digitorum communis. At the origin from the dorsal aspect of the brachial bone level of the second metacarpal bone it joins the ulnar and inserts onto the antebrachial bones. -
7 the Soft-Tissue Anatomy of the Highly Derived Hand of Perodicticus Relative to the More Generalised Nycticebus
7 The Soft-Tissue Anatomy of the Highly Derived Hand of Perodicticus Relative to the More Generalised Nycticebus Marissa Boettcher, Kaitlyn C. Leonard, Anthony Herrel and Adam Hartstone-Rose 7.1 Introduction 7.1.1 Characteristics of Perodicticus The African lorisid subfamily Perodicticinae includes the slow-moving angwantibos (Arctocebus) and the pottos (Perodicticus) (Lambert, 2014), the focal taxon of this chapter. The distinguishing physical features of this subfamily include their short tails and vestigial manual second digit (Charles-Dominique, 1977a). Perodicticus potto, first described by Bosman in 1704 and further characterised by Müller in 1776 (Bosman, 1705; Müller, 1773; Smeenk et al., 2006), was originally placed in the genus Nycticebus by Geoffroy, but the subsequent rediscovery of the animal in Sierra Leone by Bennett in the early nineteenth century became the basis for his naming the genus Perodicticus (Bennett, 1831; Hill, 1953a; Smeenk et al., 2006). Perodicticus is the largest of the African lorisids and has a geographical distribution that includes West and Central Africa, extending from Liberia to Kenya (Chiarelli, 1972; Fleagle, 1999; Nekaris and Bearder, 2007; Poindexter and Nekaris, 2017a). On average, across the three known species, the males have an average body length of 337–406 mm and tail length of 50–81 mm, while the females are slightly smaller, with an average body and tail length of 355–417 mm and 56–72 mm, respectively (Chiarelli, 1972). Like most primates, they are arboreal and often main- tain a height of 30 m above the ground in the canopy (Lambert, 2014). 7.1.2 Locomotion and Limb Anatomy The locomotion of Perodicticus is highly characteristic of the species. -
Ultrasonographic Analysis of Optimal Needle Placement for Extensor Indicis
Original Article Ann Rehabil Med 2020;44(6):450-458 pISSN: 2234-0645 • eISSN: 2234-0653 https://doi.org/10.5535/arm.20035 Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine Ultrasonographic Analysis of Optimal Needle Placement for Extensor Indicis Jin Young Kim, MD1, Hyun Seok, MD1, Sang-Hyun Kim, MD1, Yoon-Hee Choi, MD2, Jun Young Ahn, MD1, Seung Yeol Lee, MD1 1Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Soonchunhyang University Bucheon Hospital, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Bucheon; 2Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Soonchunhyang University Seoul Hospital, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea Objective To determine the most optimal needle insertion point of extensor indicis (EI) using ultrasound. Methods A total 80 forearms of 40 healthy volunteers were recruited. We identified midpoint (MP) of EI using ultrasound and set MP as optimal needle insertion point. The location of MP was suggested using distances from landmarks. Distance from MP to medial border of ulna (MP-X) and to lower margin of ulnar head (MP-Y) were measured. Ratios of MP-X to Forearm circumference (X ratio) and MP-Y to forearm length (Y ratio) were calculated. In cross-sectional view, depth of MP (Dmp), defined as middle value of superficial depth (Ds) and deep depth (Dd) was measured and suggested as proper depth of needle insertion. Results Mean MP-X was 1.37±0.14 cm and mean MP-Y was 5.50±0.46 cm. Mean X ratio was 8.10±0.53 and mean Y ratio was 22.15±0.47. Mean Dmp was 7.63±0.96 mm. Conclusion We suggested that novel optimal needle insertion point of the EI. -
Extensor Pollicis Longus Superficialis and Extensor Indicis Superficialis, Can They Be Considered As a New Anatomical Variation in the Long Extensors of Fingers?
Int. J. Curr. Res. Med. Sci. (2016). 2(12): 27-32 International Journal of Current Research in Medical Sciences ISSN: 2454-5716 www.ijcrims.com Volume 2, Issue 12 -2016 Case study DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.22192/ijcrms.2016.02.12.005 Extensor pollicis longus superficialis and extensor indicis superficialis, can they be considered as a new anatomical variation in the long extensors of fingers? Ahmed Farid Al-Neklawy, M.D. Anatomy and Embryology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt E-mail: [email protected], Tel: 00201001850336 Running title: Two extra muscles for thumb and index fingers Abstract Background: Variations of anomalies of hand extensors have been described by many authors. These anomalies are often discovered during routine surgical procedures and cadaveric dissections. Being aware of such anomalies is important to the physician in order to avoid unintentional damage to healthy tendons during surgical procedures. In addition, accessory tendons have the potential to be used in the surgical repair or replacement of damaged tendons. We reported a cadaveric case with bilateral two additional superficial extensors to the thumb and index fingers with unique features. The names of extensor pollicis longus superficialis (EPL-S) and extensor indicis superficialis(EI-S) were proposed. Methods: A female cadaver was used in this study. Bilateral dissection of the forearm and wrist was done. Results: Two extra muscles were observed in the superficial group of the extensors of the forearm. They were situated between extensor carpi radialis brevis and extensor digitorum muscles. Both muscles originated from the common extensor origin.