Nociceptive Considerations in Treating with Counterstrain

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Nociceptive Considerations in Treating with Counterstrain • Nociceptive considerations in treating with counterstrain MARK BAILEY, PhD LORANE DICK, DO The proprioceptive mechanis- nism by which counterstrain techniques ame- tic model of somatic dysfunction proposed liorate somatic dysfunction has not been ex- by Korr is accepted as the neurophysiolo- plained conclusively. (Somatic dysfunction is gic basis of counterstrain by the developer defined3 as "Impaired or altered function of re- of that manipulative technique. We sug- lated components of the somatic [body frame- gest that the physician should also take work] system: skeletal, arthrodial, and myofas- into account the physical damage, if any, cial structures, and related vascular, lym- that the original trauma produced. We pro- phatic, and neural elements." Korr o has de- pose that with tissue injury, nociceptive scribed a proprioceptive mechanism of somatic reflexes could produce patterns of motion dysfunction that Jones2 accepts as underlying restriction opposite that predicted by a counterstrain. This explanation is compatible solely proprioceptive model. A nociceptive with personal clinical impressions of changes component is suggested as an explanation observed during counterstrain treatment. for the origin and maintenance of somatic However, it seems unlikely that propriocep- dysfunction and its response to the coun- tive reflexes represent the sole element in- terstrain technique. In actuality, both pro- volved in how counterstrain works, a position prioceptive and nociceptive responses with which Korr agrees (conversation, May may occur in dysfunctional states. Other 1989). Advances in physiologic knowledge of physiologic responses also may be in- the proprioceptive functions have not changed volved. These views are consistent with Korrs concepts. These advances, in fact, have clinical experience. clarified the theoretical basis for somatic dys- (Key words: Counterstrain, osteo- function and explanations for response to ma- pathic manipulative treatment, nocicep- nipulative treatments. In this paper, we (1) sug- tive reflexes, somatic dysfunction.) gest an updated theoretical basis for somatic dysfunction involving nociceptive stimuli, and Counterstrain is a passive, positional-re- (2) examine the responses to counterstrain treat- lease manipulative technique, developed by ment. Our proposed theoretical role of nocicep- Lawrence Jones. 1,2 Counterstrain techniques tive mechanisms in initiating or maintaining place somatic systemic elements into the posi- somatic dysfunction (or both) and proposed ba- tion of greatest perceived ease, or comfort, by sis for effects of counterstrain treatment ex- passively approximating the attached surfaces tend the concepts related to proprioceptive func- of those elements. Osteopathic physicians have tions. demonstrated time and again that counter- strain is a clinically valid and useful entity. Basic reflexes However, the theoretical physiologic mecha- First, let us apply Korrs proprioceptive model to a simple hinge-type joint, the elbow. To fa- Dr Bailey, currently a senior student at the College of cilitate the discussion, let us concern ourselves Osteopathic Medicine of the Pacific, Pomona, Calif, will with only two antagonistic muscles that act be starting a neurology residency at the University of Alabama at Birmingham. Dr Dick, past chairman of the across the elbow joint: the lateral head of the Department of Osteopathic Principles and Practice, Col- triceps brachii muscle, an extensor of the fore- lege of Osteopathic Medicine of the Pacific, is currently arm, and the brachialis muscle, a forearm in private practice in San Dimas, Calif. Reprint requests to Mark Bailey, PhD, 2128 South- flexor (Figure 1). Now let us assume that while wood Rd, Jackson, MS 39211. the elbow is semiflexed, a weight is placed in (continued on page 337) 334 • JAOA • Vol 92 • No 3 • March 1992 Brief report • Bailey and Dick the hand. To lift the load, the brachialis mus- of the central nervous system, that is, from cle shortens (contracts), and the triceps mus- the brain rather than the spinal cord. 2 Col- cle is concurrently stretched. Both brachialis lectively, the muscle spindles provide proprio- and triceps muscles contain specialized encap- ceptive information, and the reflexes they me- sulated receptors called muscle spindles 6 that diate are called proprioceptive reflexes. are responsive to stretch. When the muscle is stretched, the spindles are activated. The in- Proprioceptive reflexes and somatic nervated muscle is reflexively induced to con- dysfunction tract, and the contraction is accompanied by What does this elementary neurophysiology the reciprocal inhibition of its functional an- have to do with somatic dysfunction and, more tagonists. 7 This simple reflex arc is the famil- specifically, its treatment by counterstrain? To iar myotactic or stretch reflex. When the mus- answer this question, let us return to our pre- cle shortens, the spindles are "unloaded" and, vious example in which a weight was placed as a result, their responses are quieted or even on the semiflexed upper extremity (Figure 2A). silenced.8 Thus, in our example, the spindles Furthermore, assume that the weight is ap- in the triceps muscle increase their response plied suddenly. The upper extremity is rates as the muscle is stretched. Similarly, the abruptly "loaded," and the forearm is forced spindles in the brachialis muscle decrease immediately toward extension. The brachialis their rate of firing momentarily as the muscle muscle is suddenly stretched (the strain part shortens. of Jones original strain/counterstrain), and the In simple terms, we have now defined the triceps muscle is shortened (Figure 2B). primary muscle-spindle afferent response. Mus- Subsequent reflexive reactions establish cle spindles, however, are complex receptors, and maintain the somatic dysfunction. Propri- and the primary afferent response is only one oceptive reflexes come into play (Figure 2C), constituent of an entire informational spec- and the brachialis muscle is contracted, such trum. In addition to primary spindle informa- contraction applying physiologic "brakes" to tion, there is another component provided by the runaway movement of the forearm. Accord- their gamma-efferents. 9 The functioning of the ing to Korrs4,6 explanation, this sudden shorten- gamma-efferent system and its interactions ing and concurrent silencing of the spindles with the spindle primaries is both subtle and in the triceps muscle (Figure 2E) causes both complex. For the purpose of this discussion, the gamma "gain" in the triceps muscle to be it is sufficient to state that the gamma-effer- reflexively turned up, and the muscle itself to ents augment and fine-tune the activity of the be reflexively contracted (the counterstrain of primary afferent system. 19 In our example, the strain/counterstrain) (Figure 2F). The central primary afferent spindle response of the brachi- nervous system regains its all-important spin- alis muscle is quieted, so that the central nerv- dle information but at the expense of a short- ous system is provided with little information ened triceps muscle. This muscle now reports regarding the degree of brachialis stretch. to the central nervous system that it is being The gamma efferent system subserving the stretched, even before it attains its neutral brachialis muscle would "turn up" the sensi- length. On recovery from the sudden exten- tivity of its primary afferents and restore some sion movement, flexion is resisted by a triceps level of spindle activity and information in- muscle that is now tonically shortened by its flow to the central nervous system. The pri- inappropriately high gamma gain. mary spindle afferent stretch reflex functions Clinical findings associated with this exam- largely at a segmental level." This means that ple include the forearms moving easily into the specific segment of the spinal cord respon- extension (the direction of ease), but resistance sible for the innervation of the muscle is also to movement into flexion (the direction of bind) responsible for its myotactic reflexes. In con- and pain. Thus, normal symmetry of motion trast to the primary afferents, the gamma sys- about the elbow joint is disrupted. There are tem is controlled from suprasegmental levels tender points, or painful foci, located on the Brief report • Bailey and Dick JAOA • Vol 92 • No 3 • March 1992 • 337 posterior aspect of the upper arm/forearm, with from the influence of the primary afferent spin- associated changes in tissue texture. Jones2 dle stimuli, the inappropriately exaggerated pointed out that the pathologic alteration in gamma gain can be reset by the central nerv- this type of somatic dysfunction involves tis- ous system. The forearm would be held by the sues with an essentially atraumatic history; physician in this position for a short time (typi- for example, the only external events to which cally, about 1 minute). Accompanying the nerv- the triceps muscle (the counterstrained ele- ous system–mediated release are palpable tis- ment) was exposed was that it was suddenly sue texture changes and a resolution of the allowed to shorten. Only the brachialis mus- tender points. The upper extremity is then cle (the strained element) was suddenly slowly returned to a more neutral semiflexed stretched. position. All movements of the forearm must The proprioceptive model of somatic dysfunc- be accomplished by the physician without ac- tion as applied to our example may be sum- tive assistance from the patient. 13 On
Recommended publications
  • Anatomic Variations in Relation to the Origin of the Musculocutaneous Nerve: Absence and Non-Perforation of the Coracobrachialis Muscle
    Int. J. Morphol., 36(2):425-429, 2018. Anatomic Variations in Relation to the Origin of the Musculocutaneous Nerve: Absence and Non-Perforation of the Coracobrachialis Muscle. Anatomical Study and Clinical Significance Variaciones Anatómicas en Relación al Origen del Nervio Musculocutáneo: Ausencia y no Perforación del Músculo Coracobraquial: Estudio Anatómico y Significado Clínico Daniel Raúl Ballesteros Larrotta1; Pedro Luis Forero Porras2 & Luis Ernesto Ballesteros Acuña1 BALLESTEROS, D. R.; FORERO, P. L. & BALLESTEROS, L. E. Anatomic variations in relation to the origin of the musculocutaneous nerve: Absence and non-perforation of the coracobrachialis muscle. Anatomical study and clinical significance. Int. J. Morphol., 36(2):425- 429, 2018. SUMMARY: The most frequent anatomic variations of the musculocutaneous nerve could be divided in two main groups: communicating branches with the median nerve and variations in relation to the origin, which in turn can be subdivided into absence of the nerve and non-perforation of the coracobrachialis muscle. Unusual clinical symptoms and/or unusual physical examination in patients with motor disorders, could be explained by anatomic variations of the musculocutaneous nerve. A total of 106 arms were evaluated, corresponding to 53 fresh male cadavers who were undergoing necropsy. The presence or absence of the musculocutaneous nerve was evaluated and whether it pierced the coracobrachialis muscle or not. The lengths of the motor branches and the distances from its origins to the coracoid process were measured. In 10 cases (9.5 %) an unusual origin pattern was observed, of which six (5.7 %) correspond to non-perforation of the coracobrachialis muscle and four (3.8 %) correspond to absence of the nerve.
    [Show full text]
  • Anatomical, Clinical, and Electrodiagnostic Features of Radial Neuropathies
    Anatomical, Clinical, and Electrodiagnostic Features of Radial Neuropathies a, b Leo H. Wang, MD, PhD *, Michael D. Weiss, MD KEYWORDS Radial Posterior interosseous Neuropathy Electrodiagnostic study KEY POINTS The radial nerve subserves the extensor compartment of the arm. Radial nerve lesions are common because of the length and winding course of the nerve. The radial nerve is in direct contact with bone at the midpoint and distal third of the humerus, and therefore most vulnerable to compression or contusion from fractures. Electrodiagnostic studies are useful to localize and characterize the injury as axonal or demyelinating. Radial neuropathies at the midhumeral shaft tend to have good prognosis. INTRODUCTION The radial nerve is the principal nerve in the upper extremity that subserves the extensor compartments of the arm. It has a long and winding course rendering it vulnerable to injury. Radial neuropathies are commonly a consequence of acute trau- matic injury and only rarely caused by entrapment in the absence of such an injury. This article reviews the anatomy of the radial nerve, common sites of injury and their presentation, and the electrodiagnostic approach to localizing the lesion. ANATOMY OF THE RADIAL NERVE Course of the Radial Nerve The radial nerve subserves the extensors of the arms and fingers and the sensory nerves of the extensor surface of the arm.1–3 Because it serves the sensory and motor Disclosures: Dr Wang has no relevant disclosures. Dr Weiss is a consultant for CSL-Behring and a speaker for Grifols Inc. and Walgreens. He has research support from the Northeast ALS Consortium and ALS Therapy Alliance.
    [Show full text]
  • Unusual Cubital Fossa Anatomy – Case Report
    Anatomy Journal of Africa 2 (1): 80-83 (2013) Case Report UNUSUAL CUBITAL FOSSA ANATOMY – CASE REPORT Surekha D Shetty, Satheesha Nayak B, Naveen Kumar, Anitha Guru. Correspondence: Dr. Satheesha Nayak B, Department of Anatomy, Melaka Manipal Medical College (Manipal Campus), Manipal University, Madhav Nagar, Manipal, Karnataka State, India. 576104 Email: [email protected] SUMMARY The median nerve is known to show variations in its origin, course, relations and distribution. But in almost all cases it passes through the cubital fossa. We saw a cubital fossa without a median nerve. The median nerve had a normal course in the upper part of front of the arm but in the distal third of the arm it passed in front of the medial epicondyle of humerus, surrounded by fleshy fibres of pronator teres muscle. Its course and distribution in the forearm was normal. In the same limb, the fleshy fibres of the brachialis muscle directly continued into the forearm as brachioradialis, there being no fibrous septum separating the two muscles from each other. The close relationship of the nerve to the epicondyle might make it vulnerable in the fractures of the epicondyle. The muscle fibres surrounding the nerve might pull up on the nerve and result in altered sensory-motor functions of the hand. Since the brachialis and brachioradialis are two muscles supplied by two different nerves, this continuity of the muscles might result in compression/entrapment of the radial nerve in it. Key words: Median nerve, cubital fossa, brachialis, brachioradialis, entrapment INTRODUCTION The median nerve is the main content of and broad tendon which is inserted into the cubital fossa along with brachial artery and ulnar tuberosity and to a rough surface on the biceps brachii tendon.
    [Show full text]
  • M1 – Muscled Arm
    M1 – Muscled Arm See diagram on next page 1. tendinous junction 38. brachial artery 2. dorsal interosseous muscles of hand 39. humerus 3. radial nerve 40. lateral epicondyle of humerus 4. radial artery 41. tendon of flexor carpi radialis muscle 5. extensor retinaculum 42. median nerve 6. abductor pollicis brevis muscle 43. flexor retinaculum 7. extensor carpi radialis brevis muscle 44. tendon of palmaris longus muscle 8. extensor carpi radialis longus muscle 45. common palmar digital nerves of 9. brachioradialis muscle median nerve 10. brachialis muscle 46. flexor pollicis brevis muscle 11. deltoid muscle 47. adductor pollicis muscle 12. supraspinatus muscle 48. lumbrical muscles of hand 13. scapular spine 49. tendon of flexor digitorium 14. trapezius muscle superficialis muscle 15. infraspinatus muscle 50. superficial transverse metacarpal 16. latissimus dorsi muscle ligament 17. teres major muscle 51. common palmar digital arteries 18. teres minor muscle 52. digital synovial sheath 19. triangular space 53. tendon of flexor digitorum profundus 20. long head of triceps brachii muscle muscle 21. lateral head of triceps brachii muscle 54. annular part of fibrous tendon 22. tendon of triceps brachii muscle sheaths 23. ulnar nerve 55. proper palmar digital nerves of ulnar 24. anconeus muscle nerve 25. medial epicondyle of humerus 56. cruciform part of fibrous tendon 26. olecranon process of ulna sheaths 27. flexor carpi ulnaris muscle 57. superficial palmar arch 28. extensor digitorum muscle of hand 58. abductor digiti minimi muscle of hand 29. extensor carpi ulnaris muscle 59. opponens digiti minimi muscle of 30. tendon of extensor digitorium muscle hand of hand 60. superficial branch of ulnar nerve 31.
    [Show full text]
  • Coracobrachialis Muscle Pierced by Two Nerves: Case Report
    Case Report www.anatomy.org.tr Received: April 6, 2016; Accepted: June 13, 2016 doi:10.2399/ana.16.008 Coracobrachialis muscle pierced by two nerves: case report Dawit Habte Woldeyes, Belta Asnakew Abegaz Department of Human Anatomy, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Bahir Dar University, Bahir Dar, Ethiopia Abstract The brachial plexus is formed by the union of the ventral rami of C5–T1. Contributions to the plexus by C4 and T2 differ. The coracobrachialis muscle is an elongated muscle in the superomedial part of the arm. It is a useful landmark for locating other structures in the arm. Variations exist to the coracobrachialis muscle, and to the formation of the brachial plexus, its terminal branches and its relation to surrounding structures. In this report, the coracobrachialis muscle is pierced by two nerves, and one of these nerves joins the median nerve after piercing the coracobrachialis muscle. Awareness of the possible variations of brachial plexus and its surrounding structures is necessary for adequate clinical, surgical and radiological management. Keywords: brachial plexus; coracobrachialis; median nerve; musculocutaneous nerve; unnamed nerve Anatomy 2016;10(2):148–152 ©2016 Turkish Society of Anatomy and Clinical Anatomy (TSACA) Introduction locating other structures in the arm; i.e., the musculocu- taneous nerve pierces it, and the distal part of its attach- The brachial plexus is formed by the union of the ventral ment indicates the location of the nutrient foramen of rami of C5–T1. The most common arrangement of the the humerus.[6,7] brachial plexus is as follows: the fifth and sixth rami unite as the upper trunk, the eighth cervical and first thoracic Variations in the formation of the brachial plexus and its terminal branches in the upper extremity are rami join as the lower trunk, the seventh cervical ramus [1] becomes the middle trunk.
    [Show full text]
  • Human Anatomy & Physiology I Lab 9 the Skeletal Muscles of the Limbs
    Human Anatomy & Physiology I Lab 9 The skeletal muscles of the limbs Learning Outcomes • Visually locate and identify the muscles of the rotator cuff. Assessment: Exercises 9.1 • Visually locate and identify the muscles of the upper arm and forearm. Assessments: Exercise 9.2, 9.3 • Visually located and identify selected muscles of the upper leg and lower leg. Assessment: Exercise 9.4, 9.5 Muscles of the rotator cuff Information The rotator cuff is the name given to the group of four muscles that are largely responsible for the ability to rotate the arm. Three of the four rotator cuff muscles are deep to the deltoid and trapezius muscles and cannot be seen unless those muscles are first removed and one is on the anterior side of the scapula bone and cannot be seen from the surface. On the anterior side of scapula bone is a single muscle, the subscapularis. It is triangular in shape and covers the entire bone. Its origin is along the fossa that makes up most of the “wing” of the scapula and it inserts on the lesser tubercle of the humerus bone. The subscapularis muscle is shown in Figure 9-1. Figure 9-1. The subscapularis muscle of the rotator cuff, in red, anterior view. On the posterior side of the scapula bone are the other three muscles of the rotator cuff. All three insert on the greater tubercle of the humerus, allowing them, in combination with the subscapularis, to control rotation of the arm. The supraspinatus muscle is above the spine of the scapula.
    [Show full text]
  • ANATOMY of the ELBOW and FOREARM Medial Cutaneous Nerve of Forearm Biceps Brachii Muscle Ulnar Nerve
    ANATOMY OF THE ELBOW AND FOREARM Medial cutaneous nerve of forearm Biceps brachii muscle Ulnar nerve Brachial artery and median nerve Triceps brachii muscle Medial intermuscular septum Triceps brachii muscle Lateral cutaneous nerve of forearm (terminal musculocutaneous nerve) Ulnar artery Brachialis muscle Medial epicondyle of humerus Biceps brachii tendon Radial artery Common flexor tendon Brachioradialis muscle Bicipital aponeurosis Pronator teres muscle Extensor carpi radialis longus muscle Superior ulnar collateral artery Flexor carpi (anastomoses distally with Brachioradialis muscle Ulnar nerve radialis muscle posterior ulnar recurrent artery) Extensor carpi Medial epicondyle radialis longus muscle Palmaris longus of humerus Common extensor tendon muscle Superficial Flexor carpi Extensor carpi flexor Extensor carpi radialis brevis muscle ulnaris muscle radialis brevis muscle muscles Olecranon of ulna Extensor digitorum muscle Flexor digitorum Anconeus muscle superficialis muscle Flexor pollicis longus Palmaris longus tendon Flexor carpi ulnaris muscle Extensor digiti minimi muscle muscle and tendon Dorsal branch of ulnar nerve Radial artery Extensor carpi ulnaris muscle Ulnar artery and nerve Abductor pollicis longus muscle Median nerve Flexor digitorum superficialis tendon Palmar carpal ligament Pisiform Extensor pollicis brevis muscle (continuous with extensor retinaculum) Palmar branch of median nerve Thenar muscles Hypothenar muscles Extensor pollicis longus tendon Extensor carpi radialis brevis tendon Extensor carpi radialis
    [Show full text]
  • Unknown Tendons, Muscles and Nerves of the Shoulder: Proposal for a Standardized Ultrasound-Guided Examination, a “Mini GEL” Experience
    Meyer, P et al 2015 Unknown Tendons, Muscles and Nerves of the Shoulder: Proposal for a Standardized Ultrasound-guided Examination, a “mini GEL” Experience. Journal of the Belgian Society of Radiology, 99(2), pp. 3–12, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/jbr-btr.917 PICTORIAL ESSAY Unknown Tendons, Muscles and Nerves of the Shoulder: Proposal for a Standardized Ultrasound-guided Examination, a “mini GEL” Experience Philippe Meyer*, Eric Pelé*, Lionel Pesquer*, Jacques Adolphe†, Hervé Bard‡, Jean-Louis Brasseur§, Christophe Courthaliacǁ, Catherine Cyteval¶, Henri Guerini**, Pascal Huot*, Anne Miquel††, Maryse Moinard*, Gérald Paris*, Nicolas Poussange*, Alain Silvestre*, Thierry Tavernier‡‡, Nicolas Wakim* and Benjamin Dallaudière* Thanks to its excellent spatial resolution and dynamic aspect, ultrasound of the shoulder allows an optimal evaluation of tendon, muscle and nerve’ structures in shoulder pain. Through this article and owing to inter-observer reproducibility, we will describe an ultrasound standardized protocol (posterior, anterior, global plane) in basic first ultrasounds (ie without tendon abnormality of the supra/infra spinatus, the biceps and subscapularis). Keywords: US; shoulder; tendon; nerve; unknown Introduction ultrasound examination cannot be replaced by any type Nowadays the ultrasound in musculoskeletal imaging is of imaging cross sections [1]. Though the highest major- an essential tool in patients’ diagnosis and therapeutic ity of shoulder pains deals with «basic» tendons and mus- management. For years indeed spatial resolution of cles of the rotator cuff, secondary pains may be related to ultrasound has been increasing and to date dynamic less frequent pathologies of the unknown peri musculo- tendinous structures. At the posterior face of the sacpular region, the teres * Centre d’Imagerie Ostéo-articulaire, Clinique du Sport de Bordeaux-Mérignac, 2 rue Négrevergne, 33700 Mérignac, FR minor muscle, as the most distal part of the cuff is hardly [email protected], [email protected], isolately damaged.
    [Show full text]
  • STUDY of BRACHIALIS MUSCLE: ADDITIONAL SLIP and ITS CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE Jayakumar V R 1, Paramasivam V *2 , Roshni Bajpe 3
    International Journal of Anatomy and Research, Int J Anat Res 2018, Vol 6(4.3):5974-77. ISSN 2321-4287 Original Research Article DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.16965/ijar.2018.387 STUDY OF BRACHIALIS MUSCLE: ADDITIONAL SLIP AND ITS CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE Jayakumar V R 1, Paramasivam V *2 , Roshni Bajpe 3. 1 Assistant professor, Department of Anatomy, Coimbatore medical college, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India. *2Assistant professor, Department of Anatomy, Government Mohan kumaramangalam medical college, Salem, Tamil Nadu, India. 3 Professor, Department of Anatomy, Kempegowda institute of medical sciences (KIMS), Banga- lore, Karnataka, India. ABSTRACT Background: Brachialis is a muscle of anterior compartment of arm. It has two heads. Superficial head inserting into ulnar tuberosity innervated by musculocutaneous nerve, the deep head inserts into coronoid process of ulna and supplied by radial nerve. Neuromuscular compression due to presence of additional slip of brachialis forms the basis of this study. Materials and methods: Study was done in 60 adult human cadaveric upper limbs of both the sides irrespective of sex in the Department of Anatomy, Kempegowda institute of medical sciences (KIMS), Bangalore and other medical colleges nearby. Presence of additional slips of brachialis with important and interesting relations was found which were comparable with previous studies. As qualitative method was done, Descriptive statistics were utilized. Results: Additional slips were present in 21.6%. It was found mainly in the left upper limbs in 69.2% and rest 30.7% are present in right side limbs. Among 13 specimens, additional slips originated mainly from the anteromedial aspect in 84.6% and in 15.3% it originated from the anterolateral aspect of main brachialis.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of Electrical Activity of Normal Muscle in Man at Different Degrees of Voluntary Effort
    J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry: first published as 10.1136/jnnp.38.7.683 on 1 July 1975. Downloaded from Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry, 1975, 38, 683-694 Analysis of electrical activity of normal muscle in man at different degrees of voluntary effort A. FUGLSANG-FREDERIKSEN AND A. MANSSON From the Laboratory of Clinical Neurophysiology, University Hospital (Rigshospital), and the Institute of Neurophysiology, University of Copenhagen, Denmark SYNOPSIS Electrical activity during voluntary effort was analysed in 33 normal subjects. Parameters of activity measured were number of peaks, mean amplitude, distribution of time intervals and of amplitudes between peaks. Recording from 10 sites evenly distributed over a muscle gave adequate representation of activity; force should be a fixed proportion of maximum rather than constant. When a force of 2 kg was exerted at the wrist by METHOD the brachial biceps or triceps muscles the Protected by copyright. The pattern of electrical activity was characterized electrical activity showed a greater number of (Willison, 1964; Dowling et al., 1968) by: (1) the peaks ('turns'), a lower amplitude ('amplitude incidence of voltage reversals, denoted as 'turns' (a between peaks'), and a relatively higher inci- turn was counted if it originated from two successive dence of short time intervals between peaks in voltage shifts, 100 ,uV or more in amplitude and of patients with progressive muscular dystrophy opposite sign); (2) the amplitude of voltage changes, than in controls (Willison, 1964;
    [Show full text]
  • THE HISTORY of the IDEAS on the FUNCTION of the BICEPS BRACHII MUSCLE AS a SUPINATOR by J
    THE HISTORY OF THE IDEAS ON THE FUNCTION OF THE BICEPS BRACHII MUSCLE AS A SUPINATOR by J. G. BEARN INTRODUCTION Before Leonardo da Vinci the movement of supination was always given as a function of the muscle now called the brachio-radialis. Leonardo, in a series of annotated drawings made between 1505 and I5IO, made it abundantly clear he understood that the biceps brachii was the principal supinator, in addition to its action as a flexor of the elbow. However, because he was neither a teacher of anatomy, nor did he publish his notebooks, this observation remained unnoticed, and it was not until 200 years later that this action was re- discovered by Cheselden and recorded in the first edition ofhis textbook in 17I3. Seven years later in I720 Winslow read a paper to the Academie Royale des Sciences also describing this action of the biceps as ifit were his own discovery and included it in the first edition of his textbook in 1732, giving a very clear description of the movement. This supinating action of the biceps, although briefly noted in most textbooks published after 1732 was not re-examined in detail until Duchenne's classic account in the Physiology of Motion published in I867, to which little has been added to this day. Galen (c. A.D. I29-201) The traditional method of studying muscle action, as described by Galen in De Usu Partium, was the examination of dissections accompanied by pulling on the dissected muscle, and confirmed by the palpation of the muscle belly and tendon in the living subject during active movement of the joint.
    [Show full text]
  • An Entrapment of Median Nerve and Brachial Artery Due to Double Muscular Variation in the Arm
    International Journal of Health Sciences and Research www.ijhsr.org ISSN: 2249-9571 Case Report An Entrapment of Median Nerve and Brachial Artery Due to Double Muscular Variation in the Arm Sharadkumar Pralhad Sawant**@, Shaguphta T. Shaikh*, Rakhi M. More* **Associate Professor, *Assistant Professor, Department of Anatomy, K. J. Somaiya Medical College, Somaiya Ayurvihar, Eastern Express Highway, Sion, Mumbai-400 022. @Correspondence Email: [email protected] Received: 09/08//2012 Revised: 07/09/2012 Accepted: 07/09/2012 ABSTRACT During routine dissection for First MBBS students on a 65 years donated embalmed male cadaver in the Department of Anatomy, K.J.Somaiya Medical College, we observed that the median nerve and the brachial artery passed through the coracobrachialis muscle in the right arm. The superficial fibres of the coracobrachialis muscle were normal in their insertion i.e. on the middle 5 cm of the medial border of the shaft of the humerus. We also encountered an accessory slip of the brachialis muscle originated from anteromedial surface of the shaft of humerus and got inserted into the medial epicondyle of the humerus. The accessory slip of the brachialis muscle passed over the brachial artery and the median nerve. This may result in neurovascular compression and it may have some mechanical advantages and disadvantages during the movement of elbow joint. The knowledge of such variations were important for medical fraternity such as surgeons, orthopaedicians, neurologists, radiologists and physiotherapist for dealing with injuries or operations around the elbow joint. Key words: Coracobrachialis Muscle, Brachialis Muscle, Accessory Belly, Median Nerve, Brachial Artery, Variation, Neurovascular Compression, Upper Limb Injuries, Elbow Joint.
    [Show full text]