DOCSLIB.ORG

View, Worked Closely with Artemisia

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
View, Worked Closely with Artemisia which the .hlel lwd Sisenl fell far short. In the JHel Hnd ..S)senl the figures appear as light-an-dark silhouettes depriving the work of mood or atmosphere. The result is one of the least powerful pictures ,"vithin the oeuvre of Artemisia. In terms of anatomical depiction, the Detroit picture makes subtle advances over Artemisia's other pictures including the Uffizi Judith, the Penitent il-h{Rthilen. and the illinen'll. As for dating the Detroit painting, one should consider that it shows advancement over the above mentioned pictures. To determine a date for Artemisia's pictures, one cannot assume her work shows a linear progression of quality. But in the case of the Detroit Judith, the painting's Caravaggesque lighting and sophisticated space suggest a date in the late part of her Roman years, just before she left for Naples. However, of A.rtemisia's output in Rome, in fact, nothing except the Oonl111oniere and the Burghley 5'U}'iWnH is certainly known. Bissell hypothesized that the Capodimonte Jud.1th Rnd Holofernes might belong to Artemisia's Roman period, but he was not aware of the penlimenli in this picture which led Garrard and later scholars to a different conclusion. 1 Garrard gives it a relatively early date of ca. 1612-13, well prior the date usually hypothesized for the Uffizi verSiOn, a Florentine picture, whih as he have seen, it appears to predate. 1Garrard , 1989, 32 and n. 35. The X rays were made at her request in 1983 at the National Gallery of "'lash D C See p. 48 abo\e 64 which Schutze and Willette date within five years following the JOhn T;i.king· Lei/Fe, represents a general shift in Stanzione's style.2 Stanzione's Sf 4fl/tb;/ in Capodimonte in its pose, gesture, and contrasting lights and darks call to mind Artemisia's allegorical Clio of 1632, a subject appropriate for academic painters but one which Caravaggio would not have depicted late in his career. Artemisia, nevertheless, worked it up in a manner that derives from the master's method. The figure's flesh and occasional highlights emerge from the darkened background. The paint and the brushwork still depict a freshness and vibrancy even in the blank background. Artemisia may have adapted more quickly to the freer style of Neapolitan painting, but Stanzione appears to have caught up with her. Unlike Stanzione, Bernardo Cavallino was a painter whose entire output exemplifies the bravura, painterly style associated with Neapolitan painting after 1630. He, too, is an artist who, in my view, worked closely with Artemisia. Cavallino was born in 1616 and would have been only fourteen or fifteen years of age when Artemisia came to Naples. In terms of Cavallino's formal training, De Dominici states that he studied with Massimo Stanzione. Given Artemisia's collaboration with Stanzione, Cavallino probably knew Artemisia and was probably influenced by her. But because 2Schutze and Willette, 212. date the Sf. Dorot4v at the end of the 1630s, while the .st. JOhn is given the dates 1633 35. 101 two left-side figures are pictorially cropped. If this were so, the original painting, mentioned as 8 x 10 p;ilmi(211 x 264 cm), would have been larger than the extant picture which measures 148 x 203 cm. Grabski feels such a disparity in horizontal size between the documented picture and the existing one would allow for a fifth triton to originally have been present on the left side. Certainly, another figure would have balanced the space surrounding the picture's central figure. Though the extant Gal;il.e;/ may have been altered, it is also possible that Artemisia could have painted several Galatea pictures. In the last of Artemisia's letters referring to a Galatea, she wrote, (November, 1649) expressing a willingness to repeat a subject, and went on to emphasize that, "...never has anyone found in my pictures any repetition of invention, not even of one hand." 1 That Artemisia could well have painted another G;/};il.e;/ makes Grabski's hypothesis difficult to prove. Artemisia, like her father, repeated subjects and (despite her above-cited claim to the contrary) compositions, sometimes with variations. (Her many versions of Judith and Holofernes illustrate this propensity.) For this reason, I do not find it necessary to match the extant G;/};il.e;/ with the Ruffo inventory. Conceivably, several Artemisian G;/};/i.eJis could have existed including Ruffo's version with five tritons and the Feigen picture which has four tritons. ITranslation from Garrard, 1989, 397. This quote demonstrates that even first-hand documentation from an artist is not always accurate. 145 dated in her career to 1620 and 1640, respectively. As for dating the Fogg picture, she states, "The styles of the various periods in her career do not seem to be, as yet, clearly enough differentiated to indicate where, between these two dates (the work) should be placed. "I In May of 1976, Fahy changed his attribution, supporting the artist Paolo Finoglia. Since that time, the museum has accepted his suggestion. 2 In 1978, Freedberg acknowledged the complications of the changing attributions but did not refute Fahy.3 To date, the Fogg museum lists the picture as "attributed to Paolo Finoglia". 4 To further add to the debate, Nicolson proposed in 1979 that the artist was a "follower of Simon Vouet. "5 Garrard, in 1989, defended the attribution back to Artemisia and states, "(This) painting is surely by Artemisia, and was probably painted early in her second Roman period... "6 Garrard was supported in her opinion by Stolzenwald in 1991. 7 However, Stolzenwald presented no new evidence nor any rationale for her attribution. In addition to the possible painters suggested in publication, the Fogg Museum's files have additional letters suggesting the lIbido 2Fogg file (1962.163). 3"Lorenzo Lotto to Nicolas Poussin," Apollo 107, no. 195 (197B), 395 4Ferdinando Bologno, ed., Battistello Caracciolo e i1 primo naturalismo a Naf,!.Q.1i. (Naples: Electa Napoli: 1991), 291-92. The Fogg picture was lent to this exhibition with the attribution to rinoglia. 5Benedict Nicolson, The International Caravag~ue Moyement, Lists of Pictures by.: Caravaggio and His Followers throughout Europe from 1590 to 1650, (Oxford: Phaidon, 1979),110. 6Garrard, 19B9,BO. 7Stolzenwald, like Garrard, assigns the picture to Artemisia's Roman years. 156 Figure 18. Artemisia Gentileschi, The Annunciatioo. 204 Figure 37. Massimo Stanzione, Sf John ~1king Le,,1ve of His Parents. 223 .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Chiaroscuro in the Series of Books Titled the Art of Drawing Published by Search Press, Giovanni Civardi's Drawing Light &
    Chiaroscuro In the series of books titled The Art of Drawing published by Search Press, Giovanni Civardi’s Drawing Light & Shade: Understanding Chiaroscuro discusses the application of this technique. Civardi says that “[c]hiaroscuro generally refers to the graduating tones, from light to dark, in a work of art, and the artist’s skill in using this technique to represent volume and mood” (Civardi, p. 3). Essentially, artists use chiaroscuro to show the contrast between light and dark areas in a composition “to suggest form in relation to a light source” (p. 3). The term chiaroscuro originated during the European Renaissance and artists developed the technique in various ways such as through composition, mood, and to show volume (p. 3; Harvard Art Museum glossary). For instance, chiaroscuro can be found in different kinds of art forms that include drawing, woodcuts, painting, photography, and in cinema (Hall; Landau and Parshall; Civardi). Within a compositional sense, Geertgen tot Sint Jans’s Nativity at Night (1490) is an example of establishing light sources within a painting (Earls; Hall). Ugo da Carpi, Giovanni Baglione, and Caravaggio developed the use of an unseen light source as part of the composition in their work (Earls; Hall). Caravaggio is accredited with developing the style which became known as tenebrism. This particular style stresses the intense contrast between light and dark where darkness is in prominence (Fichner-Rathus; Buser). In drawing and sketching, artists use pencil, charcoal, paint, ink, or a computer to create the effect of volume by establishing one or more light sources. In Drawing Light & Shade: Understanding Chiaroscuro, Civardi effectively explains form and cast shadow with a light source, the penumbra line “around the outer edge of the cast shadow [where] the darkness is less intense,” the shadow line, form shadow, the penumbra, cast shadow, and shadow line from the shadow cast by the object onto a surrounding surface (Civardi, pp.
    [Show full text]
  • Lecce Accoglie Caravaggio
    LECCE ACCOGLIE CARAVAGGIO LECCE ACCOGLIE CARAVAGGIO (DI MICHELE CUPPONE) Mai così strettamente legate, mistero e opera di un Caravaggio errante nel meridione in cerca di riscatto, approdano dopo quattro secoli in terra salentina. Da sempre paese di accoglienza, Lecce si prepara alla stagione estiva ospitando in primo luogo l'illustre lombardo che, nelle più disparate celebrazioni di quest’anno, forse un po' inaspettatamente scopre a sua volta una città d'arte e capitale della cultura degna del suo talento. Qui sono di certo le sfavillanti e fastose architetture barocche l'episodio artistico di maggior pregio, in un territorio che non lesina importanti testimonianze di altri periodi storico-artistici: preistoria e protostoria, età messapica e romana, bizantina e normanna, rinascimentale e manierista, tardo manierista e barocca appunto. Frapposta e sovrapposta a queste ultime due, la vicenda del caravaggismo ebbe i suoi echi anche qui; allora si era al tempo dei Vicerè spagnoli, e la Napoli nella quale operò prolificamente il Merisi era il naturale punto di riferimento e centro di irradiazione di impulsi artistici per, nella fattispecie, i pittori locali. Nel capoluogo salentino, come hanno ricostruito gli studi di Antonio Cassiano e Pierluigi Leone de Castris, si trasferì, praticamente all’indomani della morte di Caravaggio, il partenopeo Paolo Finoglio, che veicolò il verbo caravaggesco di cui a Napoli fu uno dei primi seguaci; teneva a mente, oltre alle opere del Lombardo, che lì soggiornava negli stessi anni, quelle del suo più grande interprete napoletano Battistello Caracciolo o di un Carlo Sellitto, o ancora di pittori tardomanieristi che conobbero una, magari anche breve, stagione caravaggesca e naturalistica: Filippo Vitale e Ippolito Borghese.
    [Show full text]
  • Kingston Lacy Illustrated List of Pictures K Introduction the Restoration
    Kingston Lacy Illustrated list of pictures Introduction ingston Lacy has the distinction of being the however, is a set of portraits by Lely, painted at K gentry collection with the earliest recorded still the apogee of his ability, that is without surviving surviving nucleus – something that few collections rival anywhere outside the Royal Collection. Chiefly of any kind in the United Kingdom can boast. When of members of his own family, but also including Ralph – later Sir Ralph – Bankes (?1631–1677) first relations (No.16; Charles Brune of Athelhampton jotted down in his commonplace book, between (1630/1–?1703)), friends (No.2, Edmund Stafford May 1656 and the end of 1658, a note of ‘Pictures in of Buckinghamshire), and beauties of equivocal my Chamber att Grayes Inne’, consisting of a mere reputation (No.4, Elizabeth Trentham, Viscountess 15 of them, he can have had little idea that they Cullen (1640–1713)), they induced Sir Joshua would swell to the roughly 200 paintings that are Reynolds to declare, when he visited Kingston Hall at Kingston Lacy today. in 1762, that: ‘I never had fully appreciated Sir Peter That they have done so is due, above all, to two Lely till I had seen these portraits’. later collectors, Henry Bankes II, MP (1757–1834), Although Sir Ralph evidently collected other – and his son William John Bankes, MP (1786–1855), but largely minor pictures – as did his successors, and to the piety of successive members of the it was not until Henry Bankes II (1757–1834), who Bankes family in preserving these collections made the Grand Tour in 1778–80, and paid a further virtually intact, and ultimately leaving them, in the visit to Rome in 1782, that the family produced astonishingly munificent bequest by (Henry John) another true collector.
    [Show full text]
  • The Virtuoso of Compassion Ingrid D
    The Virtuoso of Compassion Ingrid D. Rowland MAY 11, 2017 ISSUE The Guardian of Mercy: How an Extraordinary Painting by Caravaggio Changed an Ordinary Life Today by Terence Ward Arcade, 183 pp., $24.99 Valentin de Boulogne: Beyond Caravaggio an exhibition at the Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York City, October 7, 2016–January 22, 2017; and the Musée du Louvre, Paris, February 20–May 22, 2017 Catalog of the exhibition by Annick Lemoine and Keith Christiansen Metropolitan Museum of Art, 276 pp., $65.00 (distributed by Yale University Press) Beyond Caravaggio an exhibition at the National Gallery, London, October 12, 2016–January 15, 2017; the National Gallery of Ireland, Dublin, February 11–May 14, 2017 Catalog of the exhibition by Letizia Treves and others London: National Gallery, 208 pp., $40.00 (distributed by Yale University Press) The Seven Acts of Mercy a play by Anders Lustgarten, produced by the Royal Shakespeare Company, Stratford-upon- Avon, November 24, 2016–February 10, 2017 Caravaggio: The Seven Acts of Mercy, 1607 Pio Monte della Misericordia, Naples Two museums, London’s National Gallery and New York’s Metropolitan Museum of Art, mounted exhibitions in the fall of 2016 with the title “Beyond Caravaggio,” proof that the foul-tempered, short-lived Milanese painter (1571–1610) still has us in his thrall. The New York show, “Valentin de Boulogne: Beyond Caravaggio,” concentrated its attention on the French immigrant to Rome who became one of Caravaggio’s most important artistic successors. The National Gallery, for its part, ventured “beyond Caravaggio” with a choice display of Baroque paintings from the National Galleries of London, Dublin, and Edinburgh as well as other collections, many of them taken to be works by Caravaggio when they were first imported from Italy.
    [Show full text]
  • The Symbolism of Blood in Two Masterpieces of the Early Italian Baroque Art
    The Symbolism of blood in two masterpieces of the early Italian Baroque art Angelo Lo Conte Throughout history, blood has been associated with countless meanings, encompassing life and death, power and pride, love and hate, fear and sacrifice. In the early Baroque, thanks to the realistic mi of Caravaggio and Artemisia Gentileschi, blood was transformed into a new medium, whose powerful symbolism demolished the conformed traditions of Mannerism, leading art into a new expressive era. Bearer of macabre premonitions, blood is the exclamation mark in two of the most outstanding masterpieces of the early Italian Seicento: Caravaggio's Beheading a/the Baptist (1608)' (fig. 1) and Artemisia Gentileschi's Judith beheading Halo/ernes (1611-12)2 (fig. 2), in which two emblematic events of the Christian tradition are interpreted as a representation of personal memories and fears, generating a powerful spiral of emotions which constantly swirls between fiction and reality. Through this paper I propose that both Caravaggio and Aliemisia adopted blood as a symbolic representation of their own life-stories, understanding it as a vehicle to express intense emotions of fear and revenge. Seen under this perspective, the red fluid results as a powerful and dramatic weapon used to shock the viewer and, at the same time, express an intimate and anguished condition of pain. This so-called Caravaggio, The Beheading of the Baptist, 1608, Co-Cathedral of Saint John, Oratory of Saint John, Valletta, Malta. 2 Artemisia Gentileschi, Judith beheading Halafernes, 1612-13, Museo Nazionale di Capodimonte, Naples. llO Angelo La Conte 'terrible naturalism'3 symbolically demarks the transition from late Mannerism to early Baroque, introducing art to a new era in which emotions and illusion prevail on rigid and controlled representation.
    [Show full text]
  • The Collecting, Dealing and Patronage Practices of Gaspare Roomer
    ART AND BUSINESS IN SEVENTEENTH-CENTURY NAPLES: THE COLLECTING, DEALING AND PATRONAGE PRACTICES OF GASPARE ROOMER by Chantelle Lepine-Cercone A thesis submitted to the Department of Art History In conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Queen’s University Kingston, Ontario, Canada (November, 2014) Copyright ©Chantelle Lepine-Cercone, 2014 Abstract This thesis examines the cultural influence of the seventeenth-century Flemish merchant Gaspare Roomer, who lived in Naples from 1616 until 1674. Specifically, it explores his art dealing, collecting and patronage activities, which exerted a notable influence on Neapolitan society. Using bank documents, letters, artist biographies and guidebooks, Roomer’s practices as an art dealer are studied and his importance as a major figure in the artistic exchange between Northern and Sourthern Europe is elucidated. His collection is primarily reconstructed using inventories, wills and artist biographies. Through this examination, Roomer emerges as one of Naples’ most prominent collectors of landscapes, still lifes and battle scenes, in addition to being a sophisticated collector of history paintings. The merchant’s relationship to the Spanish viceregal government of Naples is also discussed, as are his contributions to charity. Giving paintings to notable individuals and large donations to religious institutions were another way in which Roomer exacted influence. This study of Roomer’s cultural importance is comprehensive, exploring both Northern and Southern European sources. Through extensive use of primary source material, the full extent of Roomer’s art dealing, collecting and patronage practices are thoroughly examined. ii Acknowledgements I am deeply thankful to my thesis supervisor, Dr. Sebastian Schütze.
    [Show full text]
  • Uva-DARE (Digital Academic Repository)
    UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository) Culturele ondernemers in de Gouden Eeuw: De artistieke en sociaal- economische strategieën van Jacob Backer, Govert Flinck, Ferdinand Bol en Joachim von Sandrart Kok, E.E. Publication date 2013 Link to publication Citation for published version (APA): Kok, E. E. (2013). Culturele ondernemers in de Gouden Eeuw: De artistieke en sociaal- economische strategieën van Jacob Backer, Govert Flinck, Ferdinand Bol en Joachim von Sandrart. General rights It is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), other than for strictly personal, individual use, unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). Disclaimer/Complaints regulations If you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please let the Library know, stating your reasons. In case of a legitimate complaint, the Library will make the material inaccessible and/or remove it from the website. Please Ask the Library: https://uba.uva.nl/en/contact, or a letter to: Library of the University of Amsterdam, Secretariat, Singel 425, 1012 WP Amsterdam, The Netherlands. You will be contacted as soon as possible. UvA-DARE is a service provided by the library of the University of Amsterdam (https://dare.uva.nl) Download date:03 Oct 2021 Summary Jacob Backer (1608/9-1651), Govert Flinck (1615-1660), Ferdinand Bol (1616-1680), and Joachim von Sandrart (1606-1688) belong among the most successful portrait and history painters of the Golden Age in Amsterdam.
    [Show full text]
  • Webfile121848.Pdf
    0 TABLE OF CONTENTS Press release ................................................................................................................................................... 2 Catalogue text: Nico Van Hout - Curator ...................................................................................................... 6 Gallery texts ................................................................................................................................................... 11 Transversal Activities ................................................................................................................................... 14 BOZAR MUSIC ......................................................................................................................................... 14 BOZAR LITERATURE ............................................................................................................................. 17 BOZAR EXPO ........................................................................................................................................... 17 BOZAR CINEMA ...................................................................................................................................... 18 Rubens for families ...................................................................................................................................... 19 Disovery trails for families (6>12) ........................................................................................................... 19
    [Show full text]
  • Winter Dialogue-Final-2
    Docent Council Dialogue Winter 2013 Published by the Docent Council Volume XLIIl No 2 From Ethereal to Earthy The Legacy of Caravaggio 1 Inside the Dialogue Reflections on a Snowy Morning.......................Diane Macris, President, Docent Council Page 3 Winter Message..................................................Charlene Shang Miller, Docent and Tour Programs Manager Page 3 A Docent’s Appreciation of Alona Wilson........................................................JoAn Hagan, Docent Page 4 An Idea whose Time had Come................................Sandy Voice Page 5 Presentations:Works of Art from Burst of Light ......Docent Contributors Pages 7-20 The Transformative Genius of Caravaggio...............JoAn Hagan Page10 Flicks: The Dialogue Goes to the Cinema....................................................Sandy Voice Page 10 A Docent’s Guide to the Saints..................................Beth Malley Page 11 From the Sublime to the Ridiculous and Back..........Hope Vath Page 13 The Bookshelf: A Book Review.................................BethMalley Page 15 A Passion for Stickley ...............................................Laura Harris Page 20 From the Collection of Stephen Gray Docent Council Dialogue The Dialogue is created by and for docents and provides a forum for touring ideas and techniques, publishing information that is vital to docent interests such as museum changes, and recording docent activities and events. The newsletter is published in Fall, Winter, and Spring editions. Editorial Staff Sandy Voice Co-Editor
    [Show full text]
  • ARTEMISIA GENTILESCHI ARTEMISIA ARTEMISIA GENTILESCHI E Il Suo Tempo
    ARTEMISIA GENTILESCHI ARTEMISIA GENTILESCHI e il suo tempo Attraverso un arco temporale che va dal 1593 al 1653, questo volume svela gli aspetti più autentici di Artemisia Gentileschi, pittrice di raro talento e straordinaria personalità artistica. Trenta opere autografe – tra cui magnifici capolavori come l’Autoritratto come suonatrice di liuto del Wadsworth Atheneum di Hartford, la Giuditta decapita Oloferne del Museo di Capodimonte e l’Ester e As- suero del Metropolitan Museum di New York – offrono un’indagine sulla sua carriera e sulla sua progressiva ascesa che la vide affermarsi a Firenze (dal 1613 al 1620), Roma (dal 1620 al 1626), Venezia (dalla fine del 1626 al 1630) e, infine, a Napoli, dove visse fino alla morte. Per capire il ruolo di Artemisia Gentileschi nel panorama del Seicento, le sue opere sono messe a confronto con quelle di altri grandi protagonisti della sua epoca, come Cristofano Allori, Simon Vouet, Giovanni Baglione, Antiveduto Gramatica e Jusepe de Ribera. e il suo tempo Skira € 38,00 Artemisia Gentileschi e il suo tempo Roma, Palazzo Braschi 30 novembre 2016 - 7 maggio 2017 In copertina Artemisia Gentileschi, Giuditta che decapita Oloferne, 1620-1621 circa Firenze, Gallerie degli Uffizi, inv. 1597 Virginia Raggi Direzione Musei, Presidente e Capo Ufficio Stampa Albino Ruberti (cat. 28) Sindaca Ville e Parchi storici Amministratore Adele Della Sala Amministratore Delegato Claudio Parisi Presicce, Iole Siena Luca Bergamo Ufficio Stampa Roberta Biglino Art Director Direttore Marcello Francone Assessore alla Crescita
    [Show full text]
  • Honthorst, Gerrit Van Also Known As Honthorst, Gerard Van Gherardo Della Notte Dutch, 1592 - 1656
    National Gallery of Art NATIONAL GALLERY OF ART ONLINE EDITIONS Dutch Paintings of the Seventeenth Century Honthorst, Gerrit van Also known as Honthorst, Gerard van Gherardo della Notte Dutch, 1592 - 1656 BIOGRAPHY Gerrit van Honthorst was born in Utrecht in 1592 to a large Catholic family. His father, Herman van Honthorst, was a tapestry designer and a founding member of the Utrecht Guild of St. Luke in 1611. After training with the Utrecht painter Abraham Bloemaert (1566–1651), Honthorst traveled to Rome, where he is first documented in 1616.[1] Honthorst’s trip to Rome had an indelible impact on his painting style. In particular, Honthorst looked to the radical stylistic and thematic innovations of Caravaggio (Roman, 1571 - 1610), adopting the Italian painter’s realism, dramatic chiaroscuro lighting, bold colors, and cropped compositions. Honthorst’s distinctive nocturnal settings and artificial lighting effects attracted commissions from prominent patrons such as Cardinal Scipione Borghese (1577–1633), Cosimo II, the Grand Duke of Tuscany (1590–1621), and the Marcheses Benedetto and Vincenzo Giustiniani (1554–1621 and 1564–1637). He lived for a time in the Palazzo Giustiniani in Rome, where he would have seen paintings by Caravaggio, and works by Annibale Carracci (Bolognese, 1560 - 1609) and Domenichino (1581–-1641), artists whose classicizing tendencies would also inform Honthorst’s style. The contemporary Italian art critic Giulio Mancini noted that Honthorst was able to command high prices for his striking paintings, which decorated
    [Show full text]
  • NGA | 2017 Annual Report
    N A TIO NAL G ALL E R Y O F A R T 2017 ANNUAL REPORT ART & EDUCATION W. Russell G. Byers Jr. Board of Trustees COMMITTEE Buffy Cafritz (as of September 30, 2017) Frederick W. Beinecke Calvin Cafritz Chairman Leo A. Daly III Earl A. Powell III Louisa Duemling Mitchell P. Rales Aaron Fleischman Sharon P. Rockefeller Juliet C. Folger David M. Rubenstein Marina Kellen French Andrew M. Saul Whitney Ganz Sarah M. Gewirz FINANCE COMMITTEE Lenore Greenberg Mitchell P. Rales Rose Ellen Greene Chairman Andrew S. Gundlach Steven T. Mnuchin Secretary of the Treasury Jane M. Hamilton Richard C. Hedreen Frederick W. Beinecke Sharon P. Rockefeller Frederick W. Beinecke Sharon P. Rockefeller Helen Lee Henderson Chairman President David M. Rubenstein Kasper Andrew M. Saul Mark J. Kington Kyle J. Krause David W. Laughlin AUDIT COMMITTEE Reid V. MacDonald Andrew M. Saul Chairman Jacqueline B. Mars Frederick W. Beinecke Robert B. Menschel Mitchell P. Rales Constance J. Milstein Sharon P. Rockefeller John G. Pappajohn Sally Engelhard Pingree David M. Rubenstein Mitchell P. Rales David M. Rubenstein Tony Podesta William A. Prezant TRUSTEES EMERITI Diana C. Prince Julian Ganz, Jr. Robert M. Rosenthal Alexander M. Laughlin Hilary Geary Ross David O. Maxwell Roger W. Sant Victoria P. Sant B. Francis Saul II John Wilmerding Thomas A. Saunders III Fern M. Schad EXECUTIVE OFFICERS Leonard L. Silverstein Frederick W. Beinecke Albert H. Small President Andrew M. Saul John G. Roberts Jr. Michelle Smith Chief Justice of the Earl A. Powell III United States Director Benjamin F. Stapleton III Franklin Kelly Luther M.
    [Show full text]