Select Bibliography

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Select Bibliography Select Bibliography GENERAL WORKS This does not include those general studies mentioned in the other categories. Clinch, Nancy Gager, The Kennedy Neurosis (1973). Fairlie, Henry, The Kennedy Promise (1973). Giglio, James N., The Presidency of John F. Kennedy (1991). Hamilton, Nigel, JFK: Reckless Youth (1992). Lasky, Victor, JFK: The Man and the Myth (1963). Martin, Ralph G., A Hero for Our Time (1983). Miroff, Bruce, Pragmatic Illusions: The Presidential Politics of John F. Ken- nedy (1976). Parmet, Herbert S., Jack: The Struggles of John F. Kennedy (1980). --, JFK: The Presidency of John F. Kennedy (1983). Reeves, Richard, President Kennedy: Profile of Power (1993). Schlesinger, Arthur M., Jr, A Thousand Days: John F. Kennedy in the White House (1965). Sorensen, Theodore C., Kennedy (1965). Wills, Garry, The Kennedy Imprisonment: A Meditation on Power (1982). VIETNAM Blair, Anne E., Lodge in Vietnam: A Patriot Abroad (1995). Chomsky, Noam, Rethinking Camelot: JFK, the Vietnam War, and US Poli­ tical Culture (1993). Duiker, William J., US Containment Policy and the Conflict in Indochina (1994). Gardner, Lloyd C., Pay any Price: Lyndon Johnson and the Wars for Vietnam (1995). Halberstam, David, The Best and the Brightest (1972). Hammer, Ellen J., A Death in November: America in Vietnam, 1963 (1988). Herring, George c., America's Longest War: The United States in Vietnam, 1950-1975, 3rd edn. (1995). Kahin, George MeT., Intervention: How America Became Involved in Vietnam (1986). McNamara, Robert, In Retrospect: The Tragedy and Lessons of Vietnam (1994). Newman, John M., JFK and Vietnam: Deception, Intrigue, and the Struggle for Power (1992). Rust, William J., Kennedy in Vietnam (1983). 277 278 Kennedy: The New Frontier Revisited Sheehan, Neil, A Bright Shining Lie: John Paul Vann and America in Vietnam (1988). CUBA Abel, Elie, The Missile Crisis (1966). Allison, Graham T., Essence of Decision: Explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis (1971). Blight, James G., The Shattered Crystal Ball: Fear and Learning in the Cuban Missile Crisis (1990). Brugioni, Dino A., Eyeball to Eyeball: The Inside Story of the Cuban Missile Crisis (1991). Detzer, David, The Brink: Cuban Missile Crisis, 1962 (1979). Dinerstein, Herbert S., The Making of a Missile Crisis, October 1962 (1976). Garthoff, Raymond L., Reflections on the Cuban Missile Crisis, rev. edn. (1989). Higgins, Trumbull, The Perfect Failure: Kennedy, Eisenhower, and the CIA at the Bay of Pigs (1989). Kennedy, Robert F., Thirteen Days: A Memoir of the Cuban Missile Crisis (1969). Nathan, James A. (ed.), The Cuban Missile Crisis Revisited (1992). Paterson, Thomas G., "Fixation with Cuba: The Bay of Pigs, Missile Crisis, and Covert War against Fidel Castro," in Kennedy's Quest for Victory: American Foreign Policy, 1961-1963, ed. Thomas G. Paterson (1989). --, and William J. Brophy, "October Missiles and November Elections: The Cuban Missile Crisis and American Politics, 1962," Journal of Amer­ ican History, 73 (June 1986), pp. 87-119. Thompson, Robert Smith, The Missiles of October: The Declassified Story of John F. Kennedy and the Cuban Missile Crisis (1992). White, Mark J, The Cuban Missile Crisis (1996). --, Missiles in Cuba: Kennedy, Khrushchev, Castro and the 1962 Crisis (1997). Wyden, Peter, Bay of Pigs: The Untold Story (1979). BERLIN CRISIS Beschloss, Michael R., The Crisis Years: Kennedy and Khrushchev, 1960-1963 (1991). Bundy, McGeorge, Danger and Survival: Choices about the Bomb in the First Fifty Years (1988). Cohen, Warren I., Dean Rusk (1980). Costigliola, Frank, "The Pursuit of Atlantic Community: Nuclear Arms, Dollars, and Berlin," in Kennedy's Questfor Victory, ed. Thomas G. Pater­ son (1989). Select Bibliography 279 Gelb, Norman, The Berlin Wall (1986). Schick, Jack, The Berlin Crisis, 1958-1962 (1971). Schwarz, Hans-Peter, Adenauer: The Statesman, 1952-1967 (1997). Stuetzle, Walther, Kennedy und Adenauer in der Berlin Krise, 1961-1962 (1971). Wyden, Peter, Wall: The Inside Story of Divided Berlin (1989). TRADE POLICY Aggarwal, Vinod K., Liberal Protectionism: The International Politics of Organized Textile Trade (1985). Ball, George W., The Past has Another Pattern: Memoirs (1982). Borden, William S., "Defending Hegemony: American Foreign Economic Policy," in Kennedy's Quest for Victory, ed. Thomas G. Paterson (1989). Calleo, David P., "Since 1961: American Power in a New World Economy" in Economics and World Power: An Assessment of American Diplomacy since 1789, ed. William H. Becker and Samuel F. Wells, Jr (1984). Dryden, Steve, Trade Warriors: USTR and the American Crusade for Free Trade (1995). Eckes, Alfred E., Jr, Opening America's Market: US Foreign Trade Policy since 1776 (1995). Evans, John W., The Kennedy Round in American Trade Policy (1971). Goldstein, Judith, Ideas, Interests, and American Trade Policy (1993). Heath, Jim F., John F. Kennedy and the Business Community (1969). Ikenberry, G. John, David A. Lake, and Michael Mastanduno, The State and American Foreign Economic Policy (1988). Lowi, Theodore J., "American Business and Public Policy: Case Studies and Political Theory," World Politics, 16 (July 1964), pp. 677-93. Pastor, Robert A., Congress and the Politics of us Foreign Economic Policy, 1929-1976 (1980). Strackbein, O.R., American Enterprise and Foreign Trade (1965). Zeiler, Thomas W., American Trade and Power in the 1960s (1992). RELAnONS WITH FRANCE Beloff, Nora, The General Says No (1963). Bohlen, Charles E., Witness to History, 1929-1969 (1973). Cogan, Charles G., Oldest Allies, Guarded Friends: The United States and France since 1940 (1994). Costigliola, Frank, "The Failed Design: Kennedy, de Gaulle, and the Struggle for Europe," Diplomatic History, 8 (Summer 1984), pp. 227-51. Harrison, Michael M., The Reluctant Ally: France and Atlantic Security (1981). Hoffman, Stanley, Decline or Renewal? (1974). Kleiman, Robert, Atlantic Crisis (1964). 280 Kennedy: The New Frontier Revisited Lacouture, Jean, De Gaulle: The Ruler, 1945-1970 (1991). Newhouse, John, De Gaulle and the Anglo-Saxons (1970). Paxton, Robert 0., and Nicholas Wahl (eds), De Gaulle and the United States: A Centennial Reappraisal (1994). Winand, Pascaline, Eisenhower, Kennedy and the United States of Europe (1993). SPACE POLICY Benson, Charles D., and William Barnaby Faherty, Moonport: A History of Apollo Launch Facilities and Operations (1978). Bilstein, Roger E., Stages to Saturn: A Technological History of the Apollo! Saturn Launch Vehicles (1980). Burrows, William E., Deep Black: Space Espionage and National Security (1986). Durant, Frederick C. (ed.), Between Sputnik and the Shuttle: New Perspectives on American Astronautics (1981). Golden, William T. (ed)., Science Advice to the President (1980). Hirsch, Richard, and Joseph Trento, The National Aeronautics and Space Administration (1973). Kinsley, Michael E., Outer Space and Inner Sanctums: Government Business and Satellite Communications (1976). Levine, Arnold S., Managing NASA in the Apollo Era (1982). Logsdon, John M., The Decision to Go to the Moon: Project Apollo and the National Interest (1970). McDougall, Walter A., The Heavens and the Earth: A Political History of the Space Age (1985). Rosholt, Robert, Administrative History of NASA, 1958-1963 (1966). Sidey, Hugh, John F. Kennedy, President (1964). Stares, Paul B., The Militarization of Space: us Policy, 1945-1984 (1985). Wiesner, Jerome B., Where Science and Politics Meet (1964). DOMESTIC POLICY Bernstein, Irving, Promises Kept: John F. Kennedy's New Frontier (1991). Berry, Joseph P., Jr, John F. Kennedy and the Media: The First Television President (1987). Brauer, Carl M., John F. Kennedy and the Second Reconstruction (1977). Graham, Hugh Davis, The Uncertain Triumph: Federal Education Policy in the Kennedy and Johnson Years (1984). Harris, Seymour E., Economics of the Kennedy Years and a Look Ahead (1964). Knapp, Daniel, and Kenneth Polk, Scouting the War on Poverty: Social Reform Politics in the Kennedy Administration (1971). McConnell, Grant, Steel and the PreSidency, 1962 (1963). Navasky, Victor S., Kennedy Justice.(1971). Select Bibliography 281 Rowen, Hobart, The Free Enterprisers: Kennedy, Johnson, and the Business Establishment (1964). Shank, Alan, Presidential Policy Leadership: Kennedy and Social Welfare (1980). Stern, Mark, Calculating Visions: Kennedy, Johnson, and Civil Rights (1992). Sundquist, James L., Politics and Policy: The Eisenhower, Kennedy, and Johnson Years (1968). Wicker, Tom, JFK and LBJ: The Influence of Personality upon Politics (1969). Zelman, Patricia G., Women, Work, and National Policy: The Kennedy-John­ son Years (1982). BEHIND CLOSED DOORS Blair, Joan and Clay, Jr, The Search for JFK (1976). Exner, Judith, as told to Ovid Demaris, My Story (1977). Heymann, C. David, A Woman Named Jackie (1989). Reeves, Thomas C., A Question of Character: A Life of John F Kennedy (1991). Theoharis, Athan (ed.), From the Secret Files of J. Edgar Hoover (1991). Index Acheson, Dean Go, 3, 74, 164, 173--4 168,175--6,177,179,180, Berlin Crisis (1961) and, 97, 104-6, 181, 183 107, 128n Vietnam and, 47, 49 Action Committee for a United Bay of Pigs invasion of Cuba, 5, 13, States of Europe, 161 14, 60n, 64, 68, 69, 70, 98, 99, Adenauer, Konrad, 149, 168, 169, 101, 198,240,257,266,272 175, 180, 181 Belknap, Michal Ro, 233 Berlin situation and, 94, 95, 98, Bell, David Eo, 195, 196, 197 112, 120, 121-2, 123, 125-6n Benelux countries, 171 Advent communications satellite, Berkowitz, Edward, 237 195, 196 Berlin, 64, 66, 67, 84, 91-123, 162, Adzhubei, Alexei, 120
Recommended publications
  • The Lost Generation in American Foreign Policy How American Influence Has Declined, and What Can Be Done About It
    September 2020 Perspective EXPERT INSIGHTS ON A TIMELY POLICY ISSUE JAMES DOBBINS, GABRIELLE TARINI, ALI WYNE The Lost Generation in American Foreign Policy How American Influence Has Declined, and What Can Be Done About It n the aftermath of World War II, the United States accepted the mantle of global leadership and worked to build a new global order based on the principles of nonaggression and open, nondiscriminatory trade. An early pillar of this new Iorder was the Marshall Plan for European reconstruction, which British histo- rian Norman Davies has called “an act of the most enlightened self-interest in his- tory.”1 America’s leaders didn’t regard this as charity. They recognized that a more peaceful and more prosperous world would be in America’s self-interest. American willingness to shoulder the burdens of world leadership survived a costly stalemate in the Korean War and a still more costly defeat in Vietnam. It even survived the end of the Cold War, the original impetus for America’s global activ- ism. But as a new century progressed, this support weakened, America’s influence slowly diminished, and eventually even the desire to exert global leadership waned. Over the past two decades, the United States experienced a dramatic drop-off in international achievement. A generation of Americans have come of age in an era in which foreign policy setbacks have been more frequent than advances. C O R P O R A T I O N Awareness of America’s declining influence became immunodeficiency virus (HIV) epidemic and by Obama commonplace among observers during the Barack Obama with Ebola, has also been widely noted.
    [Show full text]
  • Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962: Industrial Fasteners, Machine Tools and Beyond David D
    Maryland Journal of International Law Volume 10 | Issue 1 Article 4 Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962: Industrial Fasteners, Machine Tools and Beyond David D. Knoll Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.umaryland.edu/mjil Part of the International Law Commons Recommended Citation David D. Knoll, Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962: Industrial Fasteners, Machine Tools and Beyond, 10 Md. J. Int'l L. 55 (1986). Available at: http://digitalcommons.law.umaryland.edu/mjil/vol10/iss1/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@UM Carey Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Maryland Journal of International Law by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@UM Carey Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. SECTION 232 OF THE TRADE EXPANSION ACT OF 1962: INDUSTRIAL FASTENERS, MACHINE TOOLS AND BEYOND By DAVID D. KNOLL B.Com., LL.B University of New South Wales; LL.M University of Michigan; Attorney, Solicitor and Proctor of the Supreme Court of New South Wales; Associate with Jones, Day, Reavis and Pogue, Cleveland, Ohio. I. THE NEED FOR IMPORT CONTROLS AND NATIONAL SE- CURITY IN UNITED STATES LAW ....................... 55 II. THE NEED FOR IMPORT CONTROL PURSUANT TO SECTION 232 OF THE TRADE EXPANSION ACT ................... 56 A . Legislative H istory ............................ 56 B. Deterrence, Security and Free Trade in the 1980s . 59 III. G.A.T.T. IMPLICATIONS OF SECTION 232 .............. 60 IV. DEFINITIONAL ISSUES FOR A SECTION 232 INVESTIGATION 61 V. THE PROCESS OF A SECTION 232 INVESTIGATION ....... 64 VI.
    [Show full text]
  • Sector Specific Discussions and Negotiations on Goods in the Gatt and Wto
    WORLD TRADE TN/MA/S/13 24 January 2005 ORGANIZATION (05-0294) Negotiating Group on Market Access SECTOR SPECIFIC DISCUSSIONS AND NEGOTIATIONS ON GOODS IN THE GATT AND WTO Note by the Secretariat1 I. INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................2 II. SECTOR SPECIFIC DISCUSSIONS.....................................................................................3 III. SECTORAL NEGOTIATIONS ..............................................................................................4 A. KENNEDY ROUND (1964-1967).............................................................................................5 B. TOKYO ROUND (1973-1979) ..................................................................................................6 C. URUGUAY ROUND (1986-1994) ............................................................................................8 D. POST URUGUAY ROUND SECTORAL NEGOTIATIONS (1995 – TO DATE)................10 E. ACCESSIONS TO THE WTO.................................................................................................11 IV. ELEMENTS IN A SECTORAL NEGOTIATION..............................................................12 ANNEX 1 - SECTORAL NEGOTIATIONS DURING THE KENNEDY ROUND (1964-1967)............................................................................................................................................14 ANNEX 2 - SECTORAL NEGOTIATIONS DURING THE TOKYO ROUND (1973-1979)............................................................................................................................................16
    [Show full text]
  • The Making of a World Trading Power the European Economic Community (EEC) in the GATT Kennedy Round Negotiations (1963–67)
    The Making of a World Trading Power The European Economic Community (EEC) in the GATT Kennedy Round Negotiations (1963–67) Lucia Coppolaro THE MAKING OF A WORLD TRADING POWER Modern Economic and Social History Series General Editor: Derek H. Aldcroft Titles in this series include: Economics in Russia Studies in Intellectual History Edited by Vincent Barnett and Joachim Zweynert Mining Tycoons in the Age of Empire, 1870–1945 Entrepreneurship, High Finance, Politics and Territorial Expansion Edited by Raymond E. Dumett British Conservatism and Trade Unionism, 1945–1964 Peter Dorey The International Order of Asia in the 1930s and 1950s Edited by Shigeru Akita and Nicholas J. White Personal Capitalism and Corporate Governance British Manufacturing in the First Half of the Twentieth Century Myrddin John Lewis, Roger Lloyd-Jones, Josephine Maltby and Mark David Matthews A Decent Provision Australian Welfare Policy, 1870 to 1949 John Murphy Commerce and Culture Nineteenth-Century Business Elites Edited by Robert Lee The Eclipse of ‘Elegant Economy’ The Impact of the Second World War on Attitudes to Personal Finance in Britain Martin Cohen The American Reaper Harvesting Networks and Technology, 1830–1910 Gordon M. Winder Land, Proto-Industry and Population in Catalonia, c. 1680–1829 An Alternative Transition to Capitalism? Julie Marfany The Making of a World Trading Power The European Economic Community (EEC) in the GATT Kennedy Round Negotiations (1963–67) LUCIA COPPOLARO Institute of Social Sciences – University of Lisbon © Lucia Coppolaro 2013 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise without the prior permission of the publisher.
    [Show full text]
  • Non-Tariff Measures
    a Non-Tariff Measures – A Fresh Look at Trade Policy’s New Frontier Policy’s Look at Trade – A Fresh Measures Non-Tariff In a world where many forms of protection – including tariffs – are constrained by WTO disciplines, non-tariff measures (NTMs) are the new frontier of trade policy. NTMs that are poorly designed or captured by special interests can hurt competitiveness and Non-Tariff Measures – fragment markets; whereas well-designed ones can effectively overcome informational and other market failures. Assisting governments in the design of NTMs is a critical challenge for donors and development agencies. However, many issues relating, for Public Disclosure Authorized A Fresh Look at Trade example, to regional harmonisation and the interaction of NTMs with market structure are still imperfectly understood. This volume brings together recent work by young scholars that draws on original data to shed light on some of the key analytical and Policy’s New Frontier policy issues. “Non-tariff measures are of increasing importance, and as we understand them better, we also increasingly see their complexity. This volume provides up to date information and analysis of this complexity, together with valuable implications for making NTMs better serve legitimate purposes without distorting trade. It will be an essential source for trade policy specialists as well as those concerned with domestic regulation.” Alan V. Deardorff, John W. Sweetland Professor of International Economics and Professor of Economics and Public Policy, University of Michigan Public Disclosure Authorized “Non-tariff measures (NTMs) are spreading, sometimes raising trade costs, sometimes alleviating market failures. Disentangling these effects is urgent and necessary to inform policymakers about the appropriate reforms to carry out.
    [Show full text]
  • Trade Adjustment Assistance (TAA) and Its Role in U.S
    Trade Adjustment Assistance (TAA) and Its Role in U.S. Trade Policy J. F. Hornbeck Specialist in International Trade and Finance August 5, 2013 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov R41922 CRS Report for Congress Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress Trade Adjustment Assistance (TAA) and Its Role in U.S. Trade Policy Summary Congress created Trade Adjustment Assistance (TAA) in the Trade Expansion Act of 1962 to help workers and firms adjust to dislocation that may be caused by increased trade liberalization. It is justified now, as it was then, on grounds that the government has an obligation to help the “losers” of policy-driven trade opening. TAA is also presented as an alternative to policies that would restrict imports, and so provides assistance while bolstering freer trade and diminishing prospects for potentially costly tension (retaliation) among trade partners. As in the past, critics strongly debate the merits of TAA on equity, efficiency, and budgetary grounds. Nonetheless, finding agreement on TAA remains important for forging a compromise on national trade policy. TAA program authorizations are scheduled to expire on December 31, 2013. The Trade Adjustment Assistance Extension Act of 2013 (S. 1357) was introduced in the 113th Congress. It would extend TAA programs through 2020. President Obama also supports TAA reauthorization, linking it to renewal of Trade Promotion Authority (TPA), which Congress may also take up this year. This report discusses the role of TAA in U.S. trade policy from its inception as a legislative option in the early 1950s to its core role as a cornerstone of modern trade policy that many argue has served to promote the long-term U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • The United States, Brazil, and the Cuban Missile Crisis, 1962 (Part 1)
    TheHershberg United States, Brazil, and the Cuban Missile Crisis, 1962 The United States, Brazil, and the Cuban Missile Crisis, 1962 (Part 1) ✣ What options did John F. Kennedy consider after his aides in- formed him on 16 October 1962 that the Soviet Union was secretly deploy- ing medium-range nuclear-capable missiles in Cuba? In most accounts, his options fell into three categories: 1. military: an attack against Cuba involving a large-scale air strike against the missile sites, a full-scale invasion, or the ªrst followed by the second; 2. political-military: a naval blockade of Cuba (euphemistically called a “quarantine”) to prevent the shipment of further “offensive” military equipment and allow time to pressure Soviet leader Nikita Khrush- chev into withdrawing the missiles; or 3. diplomatic: a private overture to Moscow to persuade Khrushchev to back down without a public confrontation. Kennedy ultimately chose the second option and announced it on 22 Octo- ber in his nationally televised address. That option and the ªrst (direct mili- tary action against Cuba) have been exhaustively analyzed over the years by Western scholars. Much less attention has been devoted to the third alterna- tive, the diplomatic route. This article shows, however, that a variant of that option—a variant that has never previously received any serious scholarly treatment—was actually adopted by Kennedy at the peak of the crisis. The United States pursued a separate diplomatic track leading not to Moscow but to Havana (via Rio de Janeiro), and not to Khrushchev but to Fidel Castro, in a secret effort to convince the Cuban leader to make a deal: If Castro agreed to end his alliance with Moscow, demand the removal of the Soviet missiles, and disavow any further support for revolutionary subversion in the Western hemisphere, he could expect “many changes” in Washington’s policy toward Journal of Cold War Studies Vol.
    [Show full text]
  • February . 1.1, E X T E N S I 0 N S 0 F R E· M a R
    2374 CONGRESSIONAL ~ RECORD-· SENATE February . 1.1, we are hypnotized by' this", -and by overly ,.. It is up- to ..us- who now occupy .om.ce ·· Lt. Gen. Alfred Dodd Starbird, 018961, meticulous: attention-to the question of in the legislative.. and executive branches Army of the United States (brigadier gen­ of all who 'Of­ e:tal, U.S. Army). whether or- not the military menace to the Government, ·and have Maj. Gen. William Jonas Ely, 018974, Army us Is inereased or decreased fractionally ficial responsibilities, earnestly to search o! the United States (brigadier general, U.S. by the l)reseoce or absence of certain for an answer to·the problem, and ear­ .Army). tYPes -or quantities of military forces, nestly and ' honestly apply ourselves in Maj. Gen. Harold Keith Johnson, 019187, it tna.y very well be that we will fail to o.ur respective ways and in keeping with Army of the United States (brigadier gen­ face up to the basic problem-the fact our obligations to apply policies that eral, U.S. Army) • that international communism has been will meet the problem and bring about a Maj. Gen. Ben Harrell, 019276, Army of is the United States (brigadier general, U.S. established and being maintained in remedy. I know that we can do it. I Arm.y). the Western Hemisphere. believe that we shall do it. I also. believe Maj. Gen. Alden Kingsland Sibley, 018964, The American people, I believe, look that there is no time to ·be lost. Army of the United States (brigadier gen- for a very simple and' fundamental thing Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Trade War, PPE, and Race
    Northwestern Journal of Law & Social Policy Volume 16 Issue 2 Spring Article 2 Spring 4-17-2021 Trade War, PPE, and Race Ernesto A. Hernandez-Lopez Chapman Univ. School of Law, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/njlsp Part of the Civil Rights and Discrimination Commons, Health Law and Policy Commons, Law and Politics Commons, Law and Race Commons, Law and Society Commons, and the Other Public Health Commons Recommended Citation Ernesto A. Hernandez-Lopez, Trade War, PPE, and Race, 16 NW. J. L. & SOC. POL'Y. 43 (2021). https://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/njlsp/vol16/iss2/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Northwestern Pritzker School of Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Northwestern Journal of Law & Social Policy by an authorized editor of Northwestern Pritzker School of Law Scholarly Commons. Copyright 2021 by Ernesto Hernández-López Volume 16 (Spring 2021) Northwestern Journal of Law and Social Policy Trade War, PPE, and Race Ernesto Hernández-López* ABSTRACT Tariffs on Personal Protective Equipment (PPE), such as face masks and gloves, weaken the American response to COVID. The United States has exacerbated PPE shortages with Section 301 tariffs on these goods, part of a trade war with China. This has a disparate impact felt by minority communities because of a series of health inequity harms. COVID’s racial disparity appears in virus exposure, virus susceptibility, and COVID treatments. This Article makes legal, policy, and race-and-health arguments. Congress has delegated to the United States Trade Representative expansive authority to increase tariffs.
    [Show full text]
  • Will the Kennedy Round Succeed? Extension of the EEC Commission’S Authorisation to Negotiate Increases Chances of Success
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Schmücker, Herr Kurt Article — Digitized Version Will the Kennedy round succeed? Extension of the EEC Commission’s authorisation to negotiate increases chances of success Intereconomics Suggested Citation: Schmücker, Herr Kurt (1966) : Will the Kennedy round succeed? Extension of the EEC Commission’s authorisation to negotiate increases chances of success, Intereconomics, ISSN 0020-5346, Verlag Weltarchiv, Hamburg, Vol. 01, Iss. 5, pp. 4-10, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02923287 This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/137611 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen
    [Show full text]
  • UAW Special Projects Department Records
    UAW Special Projects Department Collection Records, 1945-1973 107 linear feet Accession #646 DALNET # OCLC # In 1957 the UAW created the position of Director of Special Projects and Economic Analysis for Nat Weinberg, who had headed the UAW Research Department since 1947, and he held that position until his retirement in 1974. The UAW Special Projects Department was established as part of the President’s Office and was responsible for advising the president and developing, often within a global framework, program and policy proposals and actions in the economic and collective bargaining fields and in other areas designated by the president. As Special Projects director, Weinberg helped to create innovative programs like the Supplemental Unemployment Benefits (SUB) plan and cost-of-living adjustments. Additional papers related to the files of the UAW Special Projects Department may be found in the Nat Weinberg Collection. The UAW Special Projects and Economic Analysis Department Collection consists of research material, notes, correspondence, minutes, testimony, speeches, press releases, clippings and other published material related to the department’s research, advisory, and speech writing roles as well as to Nat Weinberg’s service as consultant, trustee, or member of numerous organizations and agencies. Important correspondents in the collection: Gardner Ackley Olga Madar Ken Bannon Norman Matthews Jack Barbash Emil Mazey Irving Bluestone Tom Mboya Arthur Burns George Meany George Burt Seymour Melman Bill Casstevens George Merrelli Harry Chester William Milliken Carrol Coburn Donald Montgomery Barry Commoner Ken Morris Jack Conway Ralph Nader Nelson Jack Edwards Joe Rauh Dwight D. Eisenhower Victor G. Reuther Henry Ford II Walter P.
    [Show full text]
  • Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974: Origin, Evolution, and Use
    Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974: Origin, Evolution, and Use Updated December 14, 2020 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov R46604 SUMMARY R46604 Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974: Origin, December 14, 2020 Evolution, and Use Andres B. Schwarzenberg Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974 grants the Office of the United States Trade Representative Analyst in International (USTR) a range of responsibilities and authorities to investigate and take action to enforce U.S. Trade and Finance rights under trade agreements and respond to certain foreign trade practices. From the conclusion of the Uruguay Round of multilateral trade negotiations in 1994, which resulted in the establishment of the World Trade Organization (WTO) in 1995, until the start of the Trump Administration, the United States used Section 301 authorities primarily to build cases and pursue dispute settlement at the WTO. The Trump Administration has shown more willingness to go outside of the WTO to act unilaterally under these authorities to promote what the Administration touts as “free,” “fair,” and “reciprocal” trade. The Trump Administration’s use of Section 301 to impose tariffs as punitive measures has been the subject of congressional and broader international debate, and some in Congress have raised a number of questions regarding USTR’s actions, including the scope of USTR’s authorities, the types of trade actions allowed, and the tariff exclusion process. The Trump Administration has attributed its use of Section 301 to impose tariffs as punitive measures to its determination to close a large and persistent gap between U.S.
    [Show full text]