DOCSLIB.ORG

Will the Kennedy Round Succeed? Extension of the EEC Commission’S Authorisation to Negotiate Increases Chances of Success

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Will the Kennedy Round Succeed? Extension of the EEC Commission’S Authorisation to Negotiate Increases Chances of Success A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Schmücker, Herr Kurt Article — Digitized Version Will the Kennedy round succeed? Extension of the EEC Commission’s authorisation to negotiate increases chances of success Intereconomics Suggested Citation: Schmücker, Herr Kurt (1966) : Will the Kennedy round succeed? Extension of the EEC Commission’s authorisation to negotiate increases chances of success, Intereconomics, ISSN 0020-5346, Verlag Weltarchiv, Hamburg, Vol. 01, Iss. 5, pp. 4-10, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02923287 This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/137611 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. may exercise further usage rights as specified in the indicated licence. www.econstor.eu Will the Kennedy Round Succeed? Extension of the EEC Commission's Authorisation to Negotiate Increases Chances of Success Interview with the Federal Minister of Economics, Herr Kurt Schmiicker, Bonn INTERF-CONOMICS: Minister body that this aim could only be a where special circumstances pre- Schmficker, the Kennedy Round hypothetical working basis and vail. This goes for instance for the was originally meant to liberalise that certain exemptions could not import of cotton textiles the future world trade. In the light of the ex- be avoided. No country in the of which is at present under review perience during the Dillon Round-- world is nowadays in a position to within the framework of negotia- when :there was much bargaining cut certain import duties in half tions for prolonging the Interna- over individual customs and an without endangering its own econ- tional Cotton Agreement, The average cut of import duties.by omy. On the other hand, there was question of cutting import dufi'es only 8 % was achieved--it was pro- a consensus of opinion that exemp- on them will only arise when the posed to apply to the Kennedy tions would only be justified where future of the international agree- Round the linear method of cutting a higher national interest was at ment has been clarified. Similar are tariffs. Yet, the aim of achieving in stake. the circumstances in respect of this way a general lowering of chemical products. Here the lower- In submitting its lists of excep- duties (by 50 ~ has been badly ing of the common tariff depends tions the EEC has stuck to this jeopardi,sed by the submission of on the USA modifying its Selling principle. However, within the EEC Price System which in the opinion lists of exceptions. The danger which is still in the process of of its trading partners does no therefore arises of returning to the establishing a common market it old bargaining method. In this con- longer conform with present day is, no doubt, much more difficult to nection the EEC is being accused conditions, determine the "higher national inter- of having stood out by submitting est" than ~t is in other countries Besides, no partner to the nego- particularly long lists of exception. whose economy is not subject to tiations has so far been able to Is this allegation justified? such structural changes. Despite all refute the EEC case for exemptions. Therefore I maintain that in the SCHMUCKER: Let me first deal this the Community has succeeded light of the exceptional difficulties with the starting point of your in compiling a justifiable list of ex- and the structural changes during question. It is correct to say that ceptions. It affects no more than the transition to the Common Mar- on May 6th, 1964, a GATT confer- about 20% of all EEC imports that ket the allegations that the EEC ence on ministerial level reached are subject to import duties, or, has submitted an unduly long list agreement to aim at a general cut taking total trade with third coun- of exemptions and thus endangers of customs duties on industrial tries into account, only 9% of all the success of the Kennedy Round goods by 50~ But right from imports. This calculation, it is true, is not justified. Seen from the Ger- the beginning it was clear to every- excludes some groups of imports man view we would rather have waived certain wishes for exemp- tion; but the EEC is a community where a just equalisation of the KURT SCHMUCKER interests of all partners matters. Federal Minister for Economic Affairs and the Federal Govern- INTERECONOMICS: Beyond tiffs ment's representative in the Ministerial Council of the EEC, has it is alleged that the EEC endangers contributed considerably to bringing about an extension of the the success of the Kennedy Round EEC-Commission's authorisation to negotiate. After a long period by its agrarian protectionism. The of inactivity as regards the Kennedy Round the road towards a USA is known to he interested par- worldwide tariff reduction within the framework of GATT seems ticularly in low farm prices within to be open now.--Kurt Schmficker was born at L6ningen/Oldenburg the EEC so as to be able to in- and after passing a high-class secondary school providing human- crease its own farm exports. There istic education and a commercial school he was thoroughly trained is therefore some doubt in various as a journalist and publisher. After having been a prisoner of war quarters whether the EEC really Schmficker worked in his parent's printing office which he took wants the quickest possible con- over in 1954. His political career he started as cofounder of Junge clusion of the Kennedy Round. Such. Union (Junior members of CDU) in Oldenburg. As Chairman of the doubt concerns especially the pol- Economic Committee and of the Federal Working Group "Middle icy of the German Federal Govern- Class" he became a member of the Federal Government in 1963. ment which in the negotiations be- tween the EEC partners has been pressing for higher farm prices. INTERECONOMICS, No. 5, 1966 SCHMUCKER: These doubts are reduction in industrial import du- whole complex of agricultural mar- not justified. We are anxious to see ties, would be practically "stripped ket regulations in the EEC coun- a successful conclusion to the naked". Others have pointed out tries. In view of these weighty Kennedy Round not only in the that such a situation would make it arguments, will not the EEC have industrial but also the agricultural impossible for the EEC to offer to make concessions, and if so, to sector. It is clear that, like in any substantial tariff concessions should what extent? other country, we cannot simply there be a later round of customs SCHMUCKER: I referred to the put aside the interests of our own reductions within GATT. Could this American Selling Price System al- agriculture. But it would be wrong be the reason why--as some people ready earlier. It probably had its to assume that by our farm policy suspect--the EEC is now being justification in 1922 when the Ame- we are trying to block the negotia- very cautious over customs con- rican dye-stuff industry was only tions in the Kennedy Round. cessions? beginning to be developed; but it On the other hand, I do not wish SCHMUCKER: It is very difficult certainly is no longer justified at a to belittle the difficulties arising to draw a comparison between the time when the US chemical indus- from the fact that there are simul- customs level of the USA and that try is the most powerful in the taneous negotiations on establish- of the EEC. This is because the world. Under this system of valua- ing a Common Market for farm common tariff as a whole has its tion a tariff protection is being products and on offers being made origin in the arithmetical average reached sometimes which is far in to the Kennedy Round. Yet it would of the national customs duties of excess of 100 ~ of the value of the be a crude simplification to regard the EEC member countries. This imported goods. In most cases this these difficulties as solely due to has meant the automatic removal American system is classed as one the EEC farm prices. Though I do of extremely high as well as of of the non-tariff trade barriers. But not overlook the importance of the extremely low tariff rates. At pres- in fact it is so closely linked with question of farm prices, this is only ent the EEC rates centre round an the tariff system .that it cannot be one factor in the negotietions. The arithmetical average of about compared with other measures such various subsidies and other pro- 11.7 o/0. The American tariff, on the as taxes on motor vehicles which, tective measures applied by many other hand, comprises both many though they also interfere with in- countries--not least by the USA-- very low customs duties and quite ternational trade, are not directly also play an important part.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Lost Generation in American Foreign Policy How American Influence Has Declined, and What Can Be Done About It
    September 2020 Perspective EXPERT INSIGHTS ON A TIMELY POLICY ISSUE JAMES DOBBINS, GABRIELLE TARINI, ALI WYNE The Lost Generation in American Foreign Policy How American Influence Has Declined, and What Can Be Done About It n the aftermath of World War II, the United States accepted the mantle of global leadership and worked to build a new global order based on the principles of nonaggression and open, nondiscriminatory trade. An early pillar of this new Iorder was the Marshall Plan for European reconstruction, which British histo- rian Norman Davies has called “an act of the most enlightened self-interest in his- tory.”1 America’s leaders didn’t regard this as charity. They recognized that a more peaceful and more prosperous world would be in America’s self-interest. American willingness to shoulder the burdens of world leadership survived a costly stalemate in the Korean War and a still more costly defeat in Vietnam. It even survived the end of the Cold War, the original impetus for America’s global activ- ism. But as a new century progressed, this support weakened, America’s influence slowly diminished, and eventually even the desire to exert global leadership waned. Over the past two decades, the United States experienced a dramatic drop-off in international achievement. A generation of Americans have come of age in an era in which foreign policy setbacks have been more frequent than advances. C O R P O R A T I O N Awareness of America’s declining influence became immunodeficiency virus (HIV) epidemic and by Obama commonplace among observers during the Barack Obama with Ebola, has also been widely noted.
    [Show full text]
  • Sector Specific Discussions and Negotiations on Goods in the Gatt and Wto
    WORLD TRADE TN/MA/S/13 24 January 2005 ORGANIZATION (05-0294) Negotiating Group on Market Access SECTOR SPECIFIC DISCUSSIONS AND NEGOTIATIONS ON GOODS IN THE GATT AND WTO Note by the Secretariat1 I. INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................2 II. SECTOR SPECIFIC DISCUSSIONS.....................................................................................3 III. SECTORAL NEGOTIATIONS ..............................................................................................4 A. KENNEDY ROUND (1964-1967).............................................................................................5 B. TOKYO ROUND (1973-1979) ..................................................................................................6 C. URUGUAY ROUND (1986-1994) ............................................................................................8 D. POST URUGUAY ROUND SECTORAL NEGOTIATIONS (1995 – TO DATE)................10 E. ACCESSIONS TO THE WTO.................................................................................................11 IV. ELEMENTS IN A SECTORAL NEGOTIATION..............................................................12 ANNEX 1 - SECTORAL NEGOTIATIONS DURING THE KENNEDY ROUND (1964-1967)............................................................................................................................................14 ANNEX 2 - SECTORAL NEGOTIATIONS DURING THE TOKYO ROUND (1973-1979)............................................................................................................................................16
    [Show full text]
  • The Making of a World Trading Power the European Economic Community (EEC) in the GATT Kennedy Round Negotiations (1963–67)
    The Making of a World Trading Power The European Economic Community (EEC) in the GATT Kennedy Round Negotiations (1963–67) Lucia Coppolaro THE MAKING OF A WORLD TRADING POWER Modern Economic and Social History Series General Editor: Derek H. Aldcroft Titles in this series include: Economics in Russia Studies in Intellectual History Edited by Vincent Barnett and Joachim Zweynert Mining Tycoons in the Age of Empire, 1870–1945 Entrepreneurship, High Finance, Politics and Territorial Expansion Edited by Raymond E. Dumett British Conservatism and Trade Unionism, 1945–1964 Peter Dorey The International Order of Asia in the 1930s and 1950s Edited by Shigeru Akita and Nicholas J. White Personal Capitalism and Corporate Governance British Manufacturing in the First Half of the Twentieth Century Myrddin John Lewis, Roger Lloyd-Jones, Josephine Maltby and Mark David Matthews A Decent Provision Australian Welfare Policy, 1870 to 1949 John Murphy Commerce and Culture Nineteenth-Century Business Elites Edited by Robert Lee The Eclipse of ‘Elegant Economy’ The Impact of the Second World War on Attitudes to Personal Finance in Britain Martin Cohen The American Reaper Harvesting Networks and Technology, 1830–1910 Gordon M. Winder Land, Proto-Industry and Population in Catalonia, c. 1680–1829 An Alternative Transition to Capitalism? Julie Marfany The Making of a World Trading Power The European Economic Community (EEC) in the GATT Kennedy Round Negotiations (1963–67) LUCIA COPPOLARO Institute of Social Sciences – University of Lisbon © Lucia Coppolaro 2013 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise without the prior permission of the publisher.
    [Show full text]
  • Non-Tariff Measures
    a Non-Tariff Measures – A Fresh Look at Trade Policy’s New Frontier Policy’s Look at Trade – A Fresh Measures Non-Tariff In a world where many forms of protection – including tariffs – are constrained by WTO disciplines, non-tariff measures (NTMs) are the new frontier of trade policy. NTMs that are poorly designed or captured by special interests can hurt competitiveness and Non-Tariff Measures – fragment markets; whereas well-designed ones can effectively overcome informational and other market failures. Assisting governments in the design of NTMs is a critical challenge for donors and development agencies. However, many issues relating, for Public Disclosure Authorized A Fresh Look at Trade example, to regional harmonisation and the interaction of NTMs with market structure are still imperfectly understood. This volume brings together recent work by young scholars that draws on original data to shed light on some of the key analytical and Policy’s New Frontier policy issues. “Non-tariff measures are of increasing importance, and as we understand them better, we also increasingly see their complexity. This volume provides up to date information and analysis of this complexity, together with valuable implications for making NTMs better serve legitimate purposes without distorting trade. It will be an essential source for trade policy specialists as well as those concerned with domestic regulation.” Alan V. Deardorff, John W. Sweetland Professor of International Economics and Professor of Economics and Public Policy, University of Michigan Public Disclosure Authorized “Non-tariff measures (NTMs) are spreading, sometimes raising trade costs, sometimes alleviating market failures. Disentangling these effects is urgent and necessary to inform policymakers about the appropriate reforms to carry out.
    [Show full text]
  • Mcgeorge Bundy Oral History Interview I, 1/30/69, by Paige E
    LYNDON BAINES JOHNSON LIBRARY ORAL HISTORY COLLECTION LBJ Library 2313 Red River Street Austin, Texas 78705 http://www.lbjlib.utexas.edu/johnson/archives.hom/biopage.asp MCGEORGE BUNDY ORAL HISTORY, INTERVIEW I PREFERRED CITATION For Internet Copy: Transcript, McGeorge Bundy Oral History Interview I, 1/30/69, by Paige E. Mulhollan, Internet Copy, LBJ Library. For Electronic Copy on Compact Disc from the LBJ Library: Transcript, McGeorge Bundy Oral History Interview I, 1/30/69, by Paige E. Mulhollan, Electronic Copy, LBJ Library. INTERVIEW I DATE: January 30, 1969 INTERVIEWEE: McGEORGE BUNDY INTERVIEWER: Paige E. Mulhollan PLACE: Mr. Bundy's office, New York City Tape 1 of 1 M: Let's begin by way of identification. You are McGeorge Bundy, currently president of the Ford Foundation. Your government service, insofar as President Johnson's administration was concerned, lasted from the time he became president, when you were national security adviser, until you resigned in December of 1965 and left in what, February of 1966? B: The end of February, 1966. M: The end of February. One of the most frequent comments on Mr. Johnson as a foreign policy leader is that when he came to the presidency, he knew almost nothing about foreign affairs. Is this an accurate statement or assessment? B: Well, it is and it isn't. This was of course often said, and the President was sensitive to the fact that it was said. We were in the habit of explaining to the press, and I think perfectly fairly, that the fact that the President had not had formal diplomatic experience to any great extent was no true measure of the degree of his exposure to major questions in foreign affairs.
    [Show full text]
  • The Dilemma of NATO Strategy, 1949-1968 a Dissertation Presented
    The Dilemma of NATO Strategy, 1949-1968 A dissertation presented to the faculty of the College of Arts and Sciences of Ohio University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy Robert Thomas Davis II August 2008 © 2008 Robert Thomas Davis II All Rights Reserved ii This dissertation titled The Dilemma of NATO Strategy, 1949-1968 by ROBERT THOMAS DAVIS II has been approved for the Department of History and the College of Arts and Sciences by ______________________________ Peter John Brobst Associate Professor of History ______________________________ Benjamin M. Ogles Dean, College of Arts and Sciences iii Abstract DAVIS, ROBERT THOMAS II, Ph.D., August 2008, History The Dilemma of NATO Strategy, 1949-1968 (422 pp.) Director of Dissertation: Peter John Brobst This study is a reappraisal of the strategic dilemma of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization in the Cold War. This dilemma revolves around the problem of articulating a strategic concept for a military alliance in the nuclear era. NATO was born of a perceived need to defend Western Europe from a Soviet onslaught. It was an imperative of the early alliance to develop a military strategy and force posture to defend Western Europe should such a war break out. It was not long after the first iteration of strategy took shape than the imperative for a military defense of Europe receded under the looming threat of thermonuclear war. The advent of thermonuclear arsenals in both the United States and Soviet Union brought with it the potential destruction of civilization should war break out. This realization made statesmen on both sides of the Iron Curtain undergo what has been referred to as an ongoing process of nuclear learning.
    [Show full text]
  • Operation of the Trade Agreements Program
    lJNITED STATES TARIFF COMMISSION OPERATION OF THE TRADE AGREEMENTS PROGRAM 2oth Report 1968 TC Publication 336 UN1TED STATES TARIFF <~O-rv1MISS10~ Glenn W. Sutton Bruce E. Clubb Will E. Leonard, Jr. George M. Moore Kenneth R. Mason, Secreta:r"IJ Address all communications to Gnited States Tariff Commission Washington, D. C. 20436 UNITED STATES TARIFF COMMISSION OPERATION OF THE TRADE AGREEMENTS PROGRAM 2oth Report 1968 Prepared in Conformity With Section 4o2(b) of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962 Washington 1970 Preface This, the 2oth report issued by the United States Tariff Commis- sion on the operation of the trade agreements program, relates to the calendar year 1968. The report is made pursuant to section 4o2(b) of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962 (76 Stat. 902), which re~uires the Commission to submit to the Congress, at least once a year, a factual report on the operation of the trade agreements program. ij The principal developments during 1968 that are discussed in this report relate to actions by the United States affecting its obli- gations under the trade agreements program, actions initiated by the Contracting Parties to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade to implement that agreement, and conunercial policy developments in the major countries with which the United States has trade agreements. The report was prepared principally by John F. Hennessey, Jr., Magdolna Kornis, and Jozef Dolina. 1/ The immediat.ely. preceding report in this series was U.S. Tariff coillmission, Operati.on of the Trade Agr.e.ements Program, With a Special Chapter on the Kennedy Round 1 h Report January-December 1967, TC Publication .2 7., 19.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of the Importance of General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) and Its Contribution to International Trade
    Journal of Economics and International Finance Vol. 3(1), pp. 13-28, January 2011 Available online at http://www.academicjournals.org/JEIF ISSN 2006-9812 ©2011 Academic Journals Review Analysis of the importance of general agreement on tariffs and trade (GATT) and its contribution to international trade Kossi Ayenagbo*, Josphert Ngui Kimatu, Zhang Jing, Sidime Nountenin and Wang Rongcheng College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Northeast Normal University. No. 5268 Renmin Street, Changchun, Jilin Province, Post Code 130024, Peoples Republic of China. Accepted October 26, 2010 The establishment of trade organizations requires a number of provisions. However, the negotiators wanted to create an institution in which trade issues could be analyzed on a multilateral basis. Since its enforcement date on 1st January 1948, GATT has given international trade a new face. The international trade barely regulated before 1947, has since then become well structured and organized through the adoption of a system of work governed by general negotiations. This strategy has led to the reduction of tariffs and non-tariffs and settlement of disputes between the involved parties. There have been conferences at the ministerial level where experts and committee meetings were established to address specific problems. Several negotiations like “Kennedy round”, “Tokyo round” and “Uruguay round” have taken place since the inception of GATT. Some decisions undertaken in trade negotiations have concerned only the developing countries due to their unique problems in their development. However, Article 24 of GATT treaty authorizes regional groupings like European Economic Community (EEC), Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS), as they are constituted as a free trade area, a customs union or community, provided only that these groups do not impose trade barriers with the rest of the world.
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolution of the Transatlantic Partnership Maria G
    THE TRANSATLANTIC RELATIONSHIP AND THE FUTURE GLOBAL GOVERNANCE WORKING PAPER 03 | SEPTEMBER 2012 Despite recent perceptions that the monetary policy, trade, development end of the Cold War deprived policy, amongst others, cau- the transatlantic part- sed hand-wringing in nership of its central Washington and Euro- rationale, succes- pean capitals long sive American before 9/11 and administrations The Evolution of the invasion of have faced Iraq. This is not the challen- to suggest ge of reassu- the Transatlantic that structural ring Europe- change in the an leaders international that they Partnership system, inclu- share com- ding the rise mon interests of the BRICS in the inter- and a shift in national arena. Maria G. Cowles and US interests to- Europeans have Michelle Egan ward Asia, should alternated betwe- be discounted, but en full embrace of US does warrant caution views, voicing limited di- in asserting that the tran- sagreement on certain issues, satlantic relationship is now and occasional episodes of acute discord. transitioning to an unprecedented path. Disagreements over China, nuclear strategy, Transworld is supported by the SEVENTH FRAMEWORK PROGRAMME The Evolution of the Transatlantic Partnership Maria G. Cowles and Michelle Egan* European integration Transatlantic relations NATO Introduction The Transworld project suggests three possible scenarios for the future of transatlantic relations: 1. The transatlantic relationship is drifting apart. 2. The transatlantic relationship is evolving along a pattern of functional cooperation. 3. The transatlantic relationship is transforming towards a different but enduring partnership. The Transworld project calls attention to this era of “global flux” in which transatlantic relations “appear to have lost their bearings.
    [Show full text]
  • REPORT PREPARED by the GOVERNMENT of the UNITED STATES of AMERICA for the IN'ter-AMERICAN COMMITTEE on the ALLIANCE for PROGRES
    A1 RI U REPORT PREPARED BY THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA for the IN'TER-AMERICAN COMMITTEE ON THE ALLIANCE FOR PROGRESS and the FOURTh ANNUAL MEETINGS OF THE INTER-AMERICAN ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COUNCIL Washingto., D. C. February 1966 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Introduction Chapter I - The United States Economy at the Start of 1966 v. .* . .e. .0 . 1 Chapter II - United States-Latin American Trade and Ivestment . .... 19 United States Policy and the Kennedy Round Trade Between Latin America and the United States Selected Commodities: Recent U. S. Legislation United States Private Investment in Latin America Chapter III - United States Participation in the Alliance for Progress . .. ...... 31 United States Participation in International Organizations Peace Corps Food for Peace Participation of Private Organizations Partners of the Alliance Technical Cooperation Long-Term Capital Assistance Annex - Statistical Tables 47 INTRODUCTION In accordance with Resolution D of the Charter of Punta del Este and Resolution 1-M/63 of the Inter-American Economic and Social Council which assigned to the Inter-nnrican Committee on the Alliance for Progress (CIAP) responsibility for coordinating and promoting implementa­ tion of the Alliance for Progress, the Government of the United States of America hereby submits a report coverin8 its participation in the Alliance for Progress for consideration by CIAP and .he Fourth Annual Meetings of the Inter-American Economic and Social Council. The report describes the principal activities of the United States in support of the development efforts of Latin America under the Alliance for Progress. Particular stress is laid on events of the past year.
    [Show full text]
  • Lyndon B. Johnson Film Collection
    Johnson, Lyndon B. (1908-1973.) Film Collection, 1958-1969. Special Collections Department/Long Island Studies Institute Contact Information: Special Collections Department Axinn Library, Room 032 123 Hofstra University Hempstead, NY 11549 Phone: (516) 463-6411, or 463-6404 Fax: (516) 463-6442 E-mail: [email protected] http://www.hofstra.edu/Libraries/SpecialCollections FILMING LBJ: A SPECIAL COLLECTION FROM WHITE HOUSE NAVAL PHOTOGRAPHER COMMANDER THOMAS ATKINS, 1963-1969 The Lyndon B. Johnson presidency is unique in its collection of recordings of the chief executive’s activities. In the 1960s, the White House Naval Photographic Unit (NPC) began producing films that highlighted special presidential trips, visits, and events. Commander Thomas Atkins produced these films for the NPC, starting in 1963 in the John F. Kennedy administration and continuing through the Johnson years. About 43 of the 70+ films are available for viewing on the Lyndon B. Johnson Library’s YouTube channel at https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL853F6EAB74B64D1D . Hofstra University’s Peter S. Kalikow Center for the Study of the American Presidency has a full digitized set of the Atkins films, which are available for research in the Joan and Donald E. Axinn Library’s Special Collections room. In the summer of 2013, Ms. Nancy Lindemeyer (who, along with her husband, Robert Lindemeyer, served with Commander Atkins in the Navy) contacted Hofstra on behalf of the Atkins family to see if the Kalikow Center might be a suitable repository for the collection. Thanks to the generosity of the Atkins family and the cheerful, unstinting efforts of the Lindemeyers, the original 16 mm films were transferred to DVDs and became part of Hofstra’s holdings in 2015.
    [Show full text]
  • Fast Track Trade Authority Todd Tucker and Lori Wallach
    The Rise and Fall of Fast Track Trade Authority Todd Tucker and Lori Wallach The Congress shall have power ... to regulate commerce with foreign nations. 3 The Rise and Fall of Fast Track Trade Authority Todd Tucker and Lori Wallach © 2008 by Public Citizen’s Global Trade Watch. All rights reserved. ISBN 978-0-937188-66-8 No part of this document may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photography, recording, or by information exchange and retrieval systems, without written permission from the authors. Acknowledgments: This report was written by Todd Tucker and Lori Wallach. Additional writing and research provided by Lauren Forbes. Amy Bruno, Isaac Raisner and Rebecca Rid- dell provided research assistance. Thanks to Heather Boushey, James Decker, Bill Holland and Adina Rosenbaum for additional support. Thanks to Steve Charnovitz, Alfred Eckes, Ben Francis- Fallon, James Galbraith, Allen Matusow and Rick Perlstein for their historical insights. The authors are solely responsible for the paper’s content. Cover design by James Decker. Public Citizen’s staff is represented by the Service Employees International Union, Local 500. All photographs herein are believed to be in the public domain, and come primarily from government websites. Additional copies of this document are available from: Public Citizen’s Global Trade Watch 215 Pennsylvania Ave SE, Washington, DC 20003 (202) 546-4996 PC Product ID No: E9031 Other Titles by Public Citizen’s Global Trade Watch Federalism and Global Governance: Comparative Analysis of Trade Agreement Negotiation and Approval Mechanisms Used in U.S. and Other Federalist Governance Systems (July 2008) Prosperity Undermined: Economic Outcomes During the Era of Fast Tracked NAFTA and WTO Model Trade Agreements (June 2008) International Trade Agreements’ Constraints on State Government Procurement Policy Authority and Practices (March 2008) Presidential Candidates’ Key Proposals on Health Care and Climate Will Require WTO Modifications (Feb.
    [Show full text]