DOCSLIB.ORG

10 Ways to Be Health Secretary

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
10 Ways to Be Health Secretary HEALTH AND POLITICS Ж Access this paper online to listen to Nick Timmins and Ed Davies, policy fellow at The Health Foundation, discuss health secretaries past and present the 6 June 2015 10 ways to be health secretarybmj 350:1-36 No 8011 | Clinical research ISSN 0959-8138 JOBS, COURSES, AND CAREERS 350:1-36 No 8011 8011 No 350:1-36 Adolescent Management of As Jeremy Hunt begins a second term as health secretary, Nicholas Timmins asks 10 previousbullying and hypercalcaemia depression CPD/CME hours | 6 June 2015 | 6 June Bronchiolitis in Australia’s incumbents for their gems of wisdom on how to do the job children: shame: how not NICE guidance to treat refugees here is no handbook on how to be health secretary and two chief executives of NHS secretary of state for health. Well, up England have operated them. to now there hasn’t been. The Health But their existence has brought to the fore Foundation, however, has got as the question of how far health ministers can in close as anyone is likely easily to get reality be removed from day to day operations in Tby interviewing 10 of the last 11 former health an almost entirely tax funded system. How far secretaries—from Ken Clarke onwards—about should they be, if the service is to remain account- what they think the role is, what it should be, able to its patients and taxpayers? How far can and what it was when they were there.1 policy, which is clearly in the purview of minis- The move was prompted in part by Andrew ters, genuinely be separated from strategy, from Lansley’s decision, as part of his monster health implementation, from operations, and from man- The10 manyways faces act in 2012, to set NHS England up as a statu- agement? In other words, what is the role of the ofto ex-health be torily independent commissioning board—ful- secretary of state for health in relation to the NHS? RESEARCH CLINICAL secretarieshealth filling, on paper at least, the long held desire of 1988-2012secretary many in the NHS to somehow “depoliticise” the What is the role of a health secretary? NHS by taking ministers out of the day to day So what do the former health secretaries think? Johnson put it, “I don’t think when a bed pan management of the service. Seeking, in the words All acknowledged the accountability for what is falls on the floor in Tredegar it should echo of Lansley’s white paper, Liberating the NHS, to now an over £100bn a year operation. “There around Whitehall any more.” But there was end “political micro-management,” “political is a custodian role to play, and an accountabil- a wide range of views over how that might be control,” and “political meddling” in the service ity to discharge,” as Alan Milburn put it. Some achieved, and how far in practice ministers so that the country could have an NHS “free from put a heavier emphasis on the public health could and should be distanced from broader day-to-day political interference.” Given the com- role—either from experience or desire. Lansley operational matters. “Is it possible in any busi- plexities of the structure that Lansley created, famously wanted to turn the department into ness or in any organisation, truly to separate pol- this might, in the eyes of some at least, be a case one for public health, with the NHS becoming icy from execution?” William Waldegrave asked. of “be careful what you wish for.” the task of a junior minister once NHS England All agreed that the personality and behav- The idea of some sort of independent board with its annual rolling mandate had been set iour of the incumbent matters. Virginia to run the NHS goes back “I don’t think when a up. Faced with one almighty Bottomley (though she was far from the only decades. The British Medical row over Lansley’s legislation one) was obsessed with media coverage—in Association trailed it in 1970. bed pan falls on the and not wanting another, the her case because she cared about its impact on The Royal Commission on the floor in Tredegar prime minister blocked that. staff and patients; Stephen Dorrell’s approach NHS in 1979 reported that “the it should echo around Andy Burnham said that per- was more “chair of the board.” Alan Johnson establishment of an independ- Whitehall any more.” haps “the primary duty” was brought gentle, humour laced reassurance to ent health commission or board Alan Johnson protecting public health, a view the task, with a hint of steel. to manage the NHS was one of that may have been coloured by Johnson relates that when the Mid Stafford- the solutions most frequently advocated in evi- a flu pandemic being declared on his third day shire scandal first broke, “Bill Moyes [executive dence”—though the commission itself, while in office. chair of Monitor] was trying to tell me that [it] saying many of the arguments in favour “are But beyond that there were many differences was his responsibility and not mine [to remove attractive” came down against the idea. in emphasis. Some underlined the stewardship the trust’s chair and chief executive] because it The precise definition of what sort of board role while others saw it as being the advocate was a foundation trust. Now politically it would should run the NHS was often missing, and, for change. Clarke put this most clearly. “The be very nice if you could get away with it and when it was present, varied over the years—from job is to lead change in response to changing say, ‘That’s yours. That’s your can of worms.’ a BBC-like structure, to a management board, to demands and medical advances. To explain why But I told him, you know, ‘Piss off. I’m dealing something along the lines of the more recent you are making changes and to try to get past with this.’ Bill was probably right that the legis- independence of the Bank of England. the resistance you usually get from the staff, and lation said he was responsible. [But] you’re the In Glaziers and Window Breakers: the Role certainly from the public . You have to preside secretary of state. There is public money going in of the Secretary of State for Health in Their Own over change and explain it,” he says. there. You are responsible.” Andy Burnham had Words, the Health Foundation has not sought to There was unanimous agreement that min- a similar clash with Monitor when he took over assess the success or failure of the new arrange- isters should not be involved in the day to day and discovered that the chair and chief executive ments. They are still immensely young. Only one nitty gritty management of the service. As Alan were still interims. So he forced the issue. the bmj | 6 June 2015 15 HEALTH AND POLITICS UK HEALTH SECRETARIES Kenneth Clarke William Waldegrave Virginia Bottomley Stephen Dorrell Frank Dobson Alan Milburn July 1988 to November 1990 to April 1992 to July 1995 to May 1997 May 1997 to October October 1999 to November 1990 April 1992 July 1995- Modernised 1999 June 2003 Clarke was also Implemented the Abolished regional the GP contract Abolished GP Warned NHS it was minister of health from purchaser-provider health authorities, and encouraged fundholding and would in “the last chance 1982 to 1985, when split, stopping Margaret turning them into experimentation have liked to dump the saloon.” Got Tony he implemented the Thatcher from killing it outposts of NHS with new forms of purchaser-provider Blair to double NHS Griffiths report on NHS off. Launched ambitious management executive. contracting. Produced split. Legislated for NICE spending in real terms. management. As health “Health of the Nation” Bit the bullet on a a white paper stuffed and the Commission for Brought in foundation secretary he introduced public health targets. major reorganisation of full of ideas that Health Improvement trusts, choice and the purchaser-provider “[The job] London hospitals. Labour, knowingly or (forerunner of competition, the tariff, split, NHS trusts, and unknowingly, adopted. today’s Care Quality and independent sector depends on “Sometimes you GP fundholding, all via “Of course, it Commission). treatment centres the hugely controversial whether you want a window- Introduced national and rejuvenated the 1999 white paper think the system breaker and doesn’t work if service frameworks and purchaser-provider Working for Patients. at any given sometimes you you change it NHS Direct. split. “I closed more time is in need of want a glazier” every five years” “I have no “I’m afraid there hospitals than policy reform. problems with is not a surfeit most people had I came to think command and of politicians hot dinners” it did” control. It is part who think that of the secretary of their historical state’s job” purpose, having got power, isn’t somehow to give it away” Healthy relationships? If they are allowed to panic “then suddenly the oddly named Cooperation and Competi- The relationship between the health secre- the prime minister will just insist on going to tion Panel, which advised on the application tary and the prime minister, something not Rotherham and making pronouncements on of procurement and competition law as these often discussed and which clearly varies with what they are doing . and you can’t have that. came into play during Labour’s time. At no the prime minister of the day, also matters. They start stamping their little foot and going point were ministers statutorily required to Clarke’s relationship with Margaret Thatcher for photo opportunities and trying to get com- accept their rulings.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Parliamentary Debates (Hansard)
    Monday Volume 513 12 July 2010 No. 30 HOUSE OF COMMONS OFFICIAL REPORT PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) Monday 12 July 2010 £5·00 © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2010 This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Parliamentary Click-Use Licence, available online through the Office of Public Sector Information website at www.opsi.gov.uk/click-use/ Enquiries to the Office of Public Sector Information, Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW9 4DU; e-mail: [email protected] 639 12 JULY 2010 640 seemingly arbitrary and chaotic way in which the Secretary House of Commons of State has made and announced his decisions. The right hon. Gentleman must now know that there is Monday 12 July 2010 widespread anger in all parts of the House. Following weekend reports that he was advised by his officials not The House met at half-past Two o’clock to publish a list of schools at all, I wrote to him yesterday to request answers in advance of today’s oral questions. I have received a reply that does not answer PRAYERS any of my questions: it merely attaches a new list—list No. 5—containing 20 additional cancelled schools [MR SPEAKER in the Chair] compared with a week ago. I shall ask the right hon. Gentleman for a straight Helen Jones (Warrington North) (Lab): On a point of answer to a specific question. Did he at any point order, Mr Speaker. receive written or oral advice from departmental officials or Partnerships for Schools urging him not to publish a Mr Speaker: Order. It would not be a point of order, list of schools until after he had consulted local authorities, now, I am afraid.
    [Show full text]
  • Who's Progressive Now?
    Who’s progressive now? Greg Clark MP Jeremy Hunt MP Who’s progressive now? Greg Clark MP Jeremy Hunt MP 1 Acknowledgments The authors would like to thank Peter Franklin, Joanna Garner, Adam Smith and David O’Leary for their help in preparing this booklet. 2 Chapter 1: Progressive politics Introduction – whatever happened to the ‘Progressive Consensus’? During the last five years, Gordon Brown and his retinue of younger advisers have been on a quest – to define a political project that will in turn define his premiership. It has proved to be an arid task. Smith Institute seminars in 11 Downing Street have cast around in vain for a purpose that could be described coherently, let alone one that could be said to define the Brown vision. In the end, the task has been abandoned. Three events in the space of three weeks signalled the emptiness of Labour’s intellectual larder. First - the new Prime Minister’s barren conference speech in Brighton in September revealed that the preceding groundwork of seminars, symposia and speeches had offered up nothing usable. Next, the cancellation of the expected election, which was explained as allowing the Prime Minister another two years to set out his vision, was in fact a recognition that there was no vision to set out that would survive the scrutiny of an election campaign. Then came the intellectual surrender of the following week, in which Conservative reforms to inheritance tax set the agenda for what was, in effect, the first Budget of the Brown premiership. With no new idea that did not come from the Opposition, Alistair Darling’s statement signalled the end of the new regime’s ambition to forge an agenda of its own.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Andrew Marr Show, Jeremy Hunt, Mp
    1 ANDREW MARR SHOW, JEREMY HUNT, MP ANDREW MARR SHOW, 30TH JUNE, 2019 JEREMY HUNT, MP Foreign Secretary AM: Now the truth of the matter is, you know, you’re making a bit of progress but you’re still far, far behind Boris Johnson, and that’s partly down to your own use of language. Do you regret calling him a coward? JH: Well what I said is, “don’t be a coward,” because I think it’s a great shame. This is actually the last of your shows before many Conservative Party members will vote, because they’ll be getting their ballot papers in the next few days and he hasn’t been on here, he hasn’t been prepared to do head to head debates with me before people vote and I think people want a contest; I think that’s respectful to members and I think it will be much better for whoever’s Prime Minister to have that had contest first. So I think what we need is a bit of mojo from Bo-Jo. AM: Now you have also said he must be straight with people. Being straight is our motto here today. JH: I’m always straight on your show, Andrew. AM: Of course you are. In that spirit I want to ask about the Hunt spending splurge, because it seems like an awful lot of money. Corporation Tax, your proposals on Corporation Tax would cost about £13 billion, where would that come from? JH: Well we have about £26 billion of headroom at the moment, and this is a very – AM: I thought you’d say that.
    [Show full text]
  • A Year in Review, the Year Ahead
    2018: A YEAR IN REVIEW, 2019: THE YEAR AHEAD Foreword from Rt Hon Patricia Hewitt, Senior Adviser, FTI Consulting 2018 was the most unpredictable and tumultuous year in politics … since 2017. Which was the most unpredictable and tumultuous year in politics … since 2016. And there’s no sign of let-up as we move into 2019. The unresolved questions of Brexit - how? when? whether at all? - will inevitably dominate the coming year. Even if Theresa May brings back from Brussels a new political declaration sufficiently compelling to command a majority in Parliament - a highly unlikely prospect at the time of writing - the end of March will mean the start of a fresh, complex round of negotiations on a future trade deal, conducted under the shadow of the Irish backstop. For most people, that would be preferable to the collapse of Mrs May’s deal and, almost inevitably, the collapse of her government and a subsequent constitutional crisis. Faced with the choice between revoking Article 50 or leaving the European Union (EU) without a deal, the Commons could well produce a majority for a new referendum. Under the pressure of a leadership contest, the personal and political rancour in the Conservative Party could finally break apart Europe’s hitherto most successful party of government. A no-confidence vote that would be defeated today could command enough votes from the Brexiteers’ kamikaze tendency to force another General Election. And Labour - with most of its moderates MPs replaced by Corbynistas in last-minute candidate selections - could win on a ‘cake and eat it’ manifesto of a Brexit that would end free movement but provide frictionless trade (Irish backstop, anyone?).
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to the Council of the European Communities
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you byCORE provided by Archive of European Integration General Secretariat of the Council GUIDE TO THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES 1991 W/lliMW ι \ \\\ General Secretariat of the Council GUIDE TO THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES Brussels, 1991 Cataloguing data can be found at the end of this publication Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, 1991 ISBN 92-824-0796-9 Catalogue number: BX-60-90-022-EN-C © ECSC-EEC-EAEC, Brussels · Luxembourg, 1991 Printed in Belgium CONTENTS Page Council of the European Communities 5 Presidency of the Council 7 Conference of the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States 8 List of Representatives of the Governments of the Member States who regularly take part in Council meetings 9 Belgium 10 Denmark 11 Federal Republic of Germany 12 Greece 15 Spain 17 France 19 Ireland 21 Italy 23 Luxembourg 29 Netherlands 30 Portugal 32 United Kingdom 35 Permanent Representatives Committee 39 Coreper II 40 Coreper I 42 Article 113 Committee 44 Special Committee on Agriculture 44 Standing Committee on Employment 44 Budget Committee 44 Scientific and Technical Research Committee (Crest) 45 Education Committee 45 Committee on Cultural Affairs 46 Select Committee on Cooperation Agreements between the Member States and third countries 46 Energy Committee 46 Standing Committee on Uranium Enrichment (Copenur) 47 Working parties 47 Permanent Representations 49 Belgium 50 Denmark 54 Federal Republic of
    [Show full text]
  • Yougov / the Sunday Times Survey Results
    YouGov / The Sunday Times Survey Results Sample Size: 1011 Labour Party Members Fieldwork: 7th - 9th September 2010 1st Preference - September 2010 1st Preference - July 2010 September Choice July Choice Gender Age Diane Andy David Ed Diane Andy David Ed David Ed David Ed Total Ed Balls Ed Balls Male Female 18-34 35-54 55+ Abbott Burnham Miliband Miliband Abbott Burnham Miliband Miliband Miliband Miliband Miliband Miliband Weighted Sample 1008 106 86 91 354 287 99 45 65 244 209 431 474 320 340 577 432 331 303 374 Unweighted Sample 1011 102 89 97 344 296 93 45 69 239 221 429 485 310 353 654 357 307 317 387 % %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% 1st Preference - September 2010 [Excluding Don't know and Wouldn't Vote] David Miliband 38 0001000824 9 79 16 83 0 68 11 36 42 41 39 35 Ed Miliband 31 00001001114 13 11 69 1 62 11 50 31 31 33 28 33 Diane Abbott 11 1000000702 3144164181112131111 Andy Burnham 10 001000029 66 4 6 7 10 10 10 12 7 8 10 11 Ed Balls 9 0100000852 10 5 6 5 12 7 11 10 8 5 13 10 Weighted Sample 846 92 82 84 320 268 84 41 55 214 186 384 427 279 296 493 353 280 258 308 Unweighted Sample 849 90 85 89 308 277 80 41 58 207 199 380 438 268 309 555 294 260 266 323 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% 2nd Preference - September 2010 [Excluding Don't know and Wouldn't Vote] Ed Miliband 30 53 48 34 43 0 42 32 25 33 22 35 27 30 29 29 32 32 33 26 Ed Balls 22 200 2825251936 26 23 21 23 21 24 22 23 21 20 23 23 Andy Burnham 19 14 17 0 21 24 14 18 19 21 18 19 19 19 18 18 20 21 20 16 David Miliband 17 13 20 30 0 35 13 12 24 10 27 13 21 16 20 17 17 15 12 23 Diane Abbott 11 0 15 8 11 16 11 2 7 12 12 9 12 11 11 12 10 12 11 12 Weighted Sample 905 90 74 75 351 285 82 40 56 233 203 431 474 299 319 519 387 303 267 336 Unweighted Sample 914 87 78 84 341 293 79 40 60 228 214 429 485 290 334 592 322 283 280 351 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% Miliband preference - September [Excluding definitely wouldn't vote] David Miliband 48 19 28 41 100 1 25 34 37 86 17 100 0 80 17 47 49 48 46 48 Ed Miliband 52 81 72 59 0 99 75 66 63 14 83 0 100 20 83 53 51 52 54 52 1 © 2010 YouGov plc.
    [Show full text]
  • Research Note: Former Special Advisers in Cabinet, 1979-2013
    Research Note: Former Special Advisers in Cabinet, 1979-2013 Executive Summary Sixteen special advisers have gone on to become Cabinet Ministers. This means that of the 492 special advisers listed in the Constitution Unit database in the period 1979-2010, only 3% entered Cabinet. Seven Conservative party Cabinet members were formerly special advisers. o Four Conservative special advisers went on to become Cabinet Ministers in the 1979-1997 period of Conservative governments. o Three former Conservative special advisers currently sit in the Coalition Cabinet: David Cameron, George Osborne and Jonathan Hill. Eight Labour Cabinet members between 1997-2010 were former special advisers. o Five of the eight former special advisers brought into the Labour Cabinet between 1997-2010 had been special advisers to Tony Blair or Gordon Brown. o Jack Straw entered Cabinet in 1997 having been a special adviser before 1979. One Liberal Democrat Cabinet member, Vince Cable, was previously a special adviser to a Labour minister. The Coalition Cabinet of January 2013 currently has four members who were once special advisers. o Also attending Cabinet meetings is another former special adviser: Oliver Letwin as Minister of State for Policy. There are traditionally 21 or 22 Ministers who sit in Cabinet. Unsurprisingly, the number and proportion of Cabinet Ministers who were previously special advisers generally increases the longer governments go on. The number of Cabinet Ministers who were formerly special advisers was greatest at the end of the Labour administration (1997-2010) when seven of the Cabinet Ministers were former special advisers. The proportion of Cabinet made up of former special advisers was greatest in Gordon Brown’s Cabinet when almost one-third (30.5%) of the Cabinet were former special advisers.
    [Show full text]
  • Open PDF 273KB
    Foreign Affairs Committee Oral evidence: Global health security, HC 200 Tuesday 22 June 2021 Ordered by the House of Commons to be published on 22 June 2021. Watch the meeting Members present: Tom Tugendhat (Chair); Stewart Malcolm McDonald; Andrew Rosindell; Henry Smith; Royston Smith; Graham Stringer; Claudia Webbe. Questions 96-152 Witnesses I: Rt Hon. Jeremy Hunt MP, former Foreign Secretary and former Health Secretary. II: Niall Ferguson, historian and commentator. Examination of witness Witness: Rt Hon. Jeremy Hunt MP. Q96 Chair: Welcome to this afternoon’s session of the Foreign Affairs Committee. In a repeat of a few years ago, we have Jeremy Hunt, no longer the Foreign Secretary, before the Committee—I will call you Jeremy if that’s all right, because it would be weird not to. You are unusual in having held two of the great offices that specifically affect global health diplomacy: you were Health Secretary for nearly seven years and Foreign Secretary for nearly two years. Does the UK co- ordinate health and foreign policy well? Jeremy Hunt: I think we do it better than most other countries, but clearly not well enough. The big lesson of the last year is that we are going to have to raise our game massively. When I was Health Secretary, pandemic planning was left entirely to me and very rarely raised at Cabinet level or with the Cabinet Office. We did extensive preparations and planning, but we now know that we over-prepared for flu pandemics and under-prepared for SARS-like pandemics. We clearly did not get it all right.
    [Show full text]
  • The Passage of the Sex Discrimination (Election Candidates) Bill
    Concepts of Representation and The Passage of The Sex Discrimination (Election Candidates) Bill Dr Sarah Childs First Draft for Journal of Legislative Studies Middlesex University White Hart Lane London N17 8HR 07950-933371 [email protected] Abstract The Sex Discrimination (Election Candidates) Bill was introduced to the Commons in October 2001, gaining Royal Assent in February 2002. The Bill followed the decrease in the numbers of women elected in the 2001 General Election. It permits political parties to introduce positive action in the selection of candidates. The Bill received cross party support and had an easy passage through both Houses of Parliament. This article examines the arguments employed by MPs and Peers in support of the legislation, informed by feminist concepts of representation. Arguments associated with the claim that women have a different political style received little support. There was greater discussion of arguments based on symbolic representation and substantive representation, although many MPs were reluctant to make the strong claim that women’s substantive representation is dependent upon women’s presence. However, the most widely supported argument in favour of the Bill was the justice argument, namely, that women are currently being denied equal opportunities in the parties’ selection processes. Introduction1 The 2001 General Election saw 118 (17.9%) women MPs returned to the House of Commons. This was the first time in over twenty years that the numbers of women MPs had decreased (Lovenduski 2001). Yet it was not unexpected. Unlike 1997 when the Labour Party had implemented all women shortlists (AWS), no political party adopted positive discrimination measures for 2001.
    [Show full text]
  • House of Commons Thursday 12 July 2012 Votes and Proceedings
    No. 31 251 House of Commons Thursday 12 July 2012 Votes and Proceedings The House met at 10.30 am. PRAYERS. 1 Questions to the Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change 2 Urgent Question: Olympics security (Secretary Theresa May) 3 Statements: (1) Balance of competences (Secretary William Hague) (2) Business (Leader of the House) 4 Court of Justice of the European Union Resolved, That this House takes note of the draft Regulation 2011/0901A(COD) of the European Parliament and of the Council (amending the Protocol on the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union and Annex 1 thereto) and draft Regulation 2011/0902(COD) (relating to temporary Judges of the European Union Civil Service Tribunal) and, in accordance with section 10 of the European Union Act 2011, approves Her Majesty’s Government’s intention to support the adoption of draft Regulations 2011/0901A(COD) and 2011/0902(COD) of the European Parliament and of the Council.—(Mr David Lidington.) 5 Preparation of the 2013 European Union Budget Motion made and Question proposed, That this House takes note of an unnumbered Explanatory Memorandum dated 5 June 2012 from HM Treasury on the Statement of Estimates of the Commission for 2013 (Preparation of the 2013 Draft Budget); recalls the agreement at the October 2010 European Council and the Prime Minister’s letter of 18 December 2010 to European Commission President Manuel Barroso, which both note that it is essential that the European Union budget and the forthcoming Multi-Annual Financial Framework reflect the consolidation
    [Show full text]
  • New Ministerial Team at the Department of Health
    New Ministerial Team at the Department of Health The Rt Hon Alan Johnson MP Secretary of State for Health Alan Johnson was first elected to Parliament in 1997 as the Member for Kingston upon Hull. A former postman, Alan Johnson served as a former General Secretary of the Communication Workers Union (CWU) and is one of the largest trade union names to have entered Parliament in recent decades. Often credited with the much coveted tag of being an "ordinary bloke", he is highly articulate and effective and is credited with the successful campaign that deterred the previous Conservative government from privatising the Post Office. Popular among his peers, Alan Johnson is generally regarded to be on the centre right of the Labour Party and is well regarded by the Labour leadership. As a union member of Labour's ruling NEC (up to 1996) he was seen as supportive of Tony Blair's attempts to modernise the Labour Party. He was the only senior union leader to back the abolition of Labour's clause IV. He becomes the first former union leader to become a cabinet minister in nearly 40 years when he is appointed to the Work and Pensions brief in 2004. After moving to Trade and Industry, he becomes Education and Skills Secretary in May 2006. After being tipped by many as the front-runner in the Labour deputy leadership contest of 2007, Alan Johnson was narrowly beaten by Harriet Harman. Commons Career PPS to Dawn Primarolo: as Financial Secretary, HM Treasury 1997-99, as Paymaster General, HM Treasury 1999; Department of Trade and Industry 1999-2003:
    [Show full text]
  • Contents Theresa May - the Prime Minister
    Contents Theresa May - The Prime Minister .......................................................................................................... 5 Nancy Astor - The first female Member of Parliament to take her seat ................................................ 6 Anne Jenkin - Co-founder Women 2 Win ............................................................................................... 7 Margaret Thatcher – Britain’s first woman Prime Minister .................................................................... 8 Penny Mordaunt – First woman Minister of State for the Armed Forces at the Ministry of Defence ... 9 Lucy Baldwin - Midwifery and safer birth campaigner ......................................................................... 10 Hazel Byford – Conservative Women’s Organisation Chairman 1990 - 1993....................................... 11 Emmeline Pankhurst – Leader of the British Suffragette Movement .................................................. 12 Andrea Leadsom – Leader of House of Commons ................................................................................ 13 Florence Horsbrugh - First woman to move the Address in reply to the King's Speech ...................... 14 Helen Whately – Deputy Chairman of the Conservative Party ............................................................. 15 Gillian Shephard – Chairman of the Association of Conservative Peers ............................................... 16 Dorothy Brant – Suffragette who brought women into Conservative Associations ...........................
    [Show full text]