DOCSLIB.ORG

Branchville 2017 TOD Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Branchville 2017 TOD Plan Branchville Transit Oriented Development Plan February 2017 Project Team Fitzgerald & Halliday Inc. Harriman Tighe & Bond Greg Wies & Gardner Architects AMS Consulting Acknowledgements This plan was made possible through the commitment of many dedicated individuals including Jon Chew and Dave Hannon of WestCOG, First Selectman Rudy Marconi of Ridgefield, and other members of the TOD Task Force including: Charles Fisher, Betty Brosius, Adam Schnell, and Joanne Meder from the Town of Ridgefield; Anna Bergeron, Molly Parsons, and Roxanne Fromson from CTDOT; First Selectwoman Julia Pemberton from the Town of Redding; Dave Goldenberg, Dennis Grimaldi, Devon Pettitt, Gene Nazarro, Joe Ancona, Joe Chelednik, Magda Fincham, Nathan Zezula, and Alex Karsanidi. Branchville Transit Oriented Development Plan Contents Executive Summary...........................................................1 Introduction......................................................................9 Existing Conditions Analysis.........................................13 Charrette ..........................................................................47 Planning Strategies..........................................................57 Build Out Analysis..........................................................65 Recommended Development Plan...............................79 Mobility Plan...................................................................89 Stormwater & Floodplain Management Plan..............95 Zoning Recommendations...........................................101 Design Guidelines.........................................................109 Implementation Strategies...........................................119 Branchville Transit Oriented Development Plan This page left intentionally blank Branchville Transit Oriented Development Plan Executive Summary Branchville Transit Oriented Development Plan 1 Introduction to the TOD Plan Existing Conditions This plan was commissioned by the Western The project team conducted an extensive analysis Connecticut Council of Governments (WestCOG) of existing conditions within the study area. This on behalf of the Town of Ridgefield. The goal of this included a review of historic resources, land use, plan is to identify infrastructure improvements and environmental resources, zoning, infrastructure, regulatory changes necessary to support development transportation and a analysis of market conditions. in the Branchville Station Area. This plan also seeks Historic Resources to identify measures that the Town and Region can take to encourage pedestrian and transit friendly As a historic village, Branchville is rich in historic development in the Branchville Station area. The resources. Of the approximately 50 buildings that lie Town seeks to ensure that future development within the project’s focus area, 80 percent are greater will provide an environment that is supportive of than 50 years old. The earliest buildings within the local residents, property owners, businesses, and focus area lie along West Branchville Road and commuters. Portland Avenue on the hill east of the train tracks. These buildings date from the 18th, 19th and 20th Eighty percent of the project is funded by the Federal centuries and display Second Empire, Federal, Shingle, Surface Transportation Program with the balance Greek Revival, Colonial Revival, and Italianate provided by the Region (WestCOG) and the Town of architectural forms. Ridgefield. This project is aligned with the State’s goal of encouraging development in station areas so as to There are no local historic districts within the project maximize value of transit improvements and support focus area and thus alterations to buildings within local economic development. this area are not restricted, however there are specific procedures which guide demolition. In the event This plan was guided by a Task Force comprised that federal funds are used for the implementation of representatives from the Town of Ridgefield, of the Branchville TOD Study, consultation would Town of Redding, Western Connecticut Council be required with the Connecticut State Historic of Governments, and the Connecticut Department Preservation Office to determine if there are adverse of Transportation as well as Branchville residents, effects to historic properties. property owners, and business owners. Land Use and Ownership The Branchville Study Area The Branchville study area is largely comprised of low Branchville is located in the southeast corner of density residential development and undeveloped land Ridgefield adjacent to the Towns of Redding and 1/2 mile in Ridgefield, Redding and Wilton. Commercial, retail radius of and restaurant uses are primarily located along Route Wilton. The study area for this plan is within a half- station mile radius of Branchville Station, with most of the Ridgefield 7 and Branchville Road and at the northern end of efforts being focused within Ridgefield and areas in West Branchville Road. close proximity of the station. The half-mile station Redding A small number of owners with more than twenty radius represents a typical study area for Transit Branchville property owners holding more than one property in Oriented Development (TOD) plans, as this represents Station the station area. These ownership patterns suggest the the area that is typically accessible within walking potential for property assemblage that could facilitate distance of a station. Due to the local topography and development in the study area. limited roadway network, the potential development Wilton area for Branchville is closer in proximity to the station than the half-mile extent. 2 Branchville Transit Oriented Development Plan Environmental Resources An environmental review of the study area revealed which does not allow for concurrent operation of Branchville Station and the surrounding commercial twenty nine hazardous material sites. These sites are traffic in both directions. The Connecticut DOT area occupy a narrow valley along the Norwalk River. scattered throughout the study area, however, the is currently evaluating design options for replacing The topography to the east and west of the station majority are located in the vicinity of Ethan Allen bridges on both roadways and reconfiguring station is relatively steep and has consequently limited the Highway. Of these sites, only four were identified as access. high-risk that require further investigation. density of development in those areas. As a whole, the most significant transportation The project area also includes two Natural Diversity infrastructure deficiency in the study area is the lack of Much of the Route 7 and Branchville Road corridor Database (NDDB) areas. Properties located within in Branchville rests in the floodplain and/or floodway. pedestrian facilities. With a few exceptions, there are the mapped NDDB areas have the potential to impact almost no sidewalks in the study area. Additionally, The floodway is comprised of the channel of the the state’s rare plants, animals or significant natural Norwalk River and Cooper Pond Brook and the parts marked crosswalks across Route 7 and Route 102 are communities. Before starting construction on or limited and lack basic infrastructure such as curb of the floodplain adjoining those channels that are acquiring properties within mapped NDDB areas, a reasonably required to efficiently carry and discharge ramps, pedestrian phases, and pedestrian signal head. Request for NDDB State Listed Species Review must The map below highlights areas where transportation the flood water or flood flow of a river or stream. be completed. There are a number of buildings and businesses infrastructure is deficient. in Branchville that are located within, or in close Zoning proximity to the floodway. Future development within Overall, the existing zoning in the study area provides this area will be highly restricted. The map below only limited support for transit oriented development. shows the extent of floodway and floodplain in the The zoning districts, which vary between towns, are study area. largely low density residential with limited commercial districts in each town. Additionally, there are very limited specific site design requirements that could regulate the overall form of development; drive the how the character of individual sites form. As such, the existing zoning districts within Branchville are not configured to promote strengthening of the sense of place that is desired for a transit oriented village. Infrastructure Norwalk River As a small village in a narrow river valley, Branchville’s transportation infrastructure is relatively limited. The Ethan Allen Highway (Route 7) provides a north/ south connection to Danbury to the north and Wilton and Norwalk to the south. Branchville Road (Route 102) provides an east/west connection between Branchville and Ridgefield Center. The rail corridor N also provides a regional connection from north to Water Service in the TOD area is provided by Flood Zones N south and parallels Route 7 along much of its route between Danbury and Norwalk. Aquarion Water Company. Aquarion reports that a 16” water main is located in Danbury Road (Route 7) Rail crossings and station access are provided by which extends up to Branchville Road (Route 102). Portland Avenue and Depot Road, both are local The 16” main then continues westerly up Branchville roadways with ageing and/or deficient bridges. The Road to provide water service to Ridgefield Center. Depot Road Bridge is
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Transit Oriented Development Final Report | September 2010
    FTA ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS DRAFT/FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT DANBURY BRANCH IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT FINAL REPORT | SEPTEMBER 2010 In Cooperation with U.S. Department CONNECTICUT South Western Regional Planning Agency of Transportation DEPARTMENT OF Federal Transit TRANSPORTATION Administration FTA ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS DRAFT/FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT DANBURY BRANCH IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT FINAL REPORT | SEPTEMBER 2010 In Cooperation with U.S. Department CONNECTICUT South Western Regional Planning Agency of Transportation DEPARTMENT OF Federal Transit TRANSPORTATION Administration Abstract This report presents an evaluation of transit-oriented development (TOD) opportunities within the Danbury Branch study corridor as a component of the Federal Transit Administration Alternatives Analysis/ Draft Environmental Impact Statement (FTA AA/DEIS) prepared for the Connecticut Department of Transportation (CTDOT). This report is intended as a tool for municipalities to use as they move forward with their TOD efforts. The report identifies the range of TOD opportunities at station areas within the corridor that could result from improvements to the Danbury Branch. By also providing information regarding FTA guidelines and TOD best practices, this report serves as a reference and a guide for future TOD efforts in the Danbury Branch study corridor. Specifically, this report presents a definition of TOD and the elements of TOD that are relevant to the Danbury Branch. It also presents a summary of FTA Guidance regarding TOD and includes case studies of FTA-funded projects that have been rated with respect to their livability, land use, and economic development components. Additionally, the report examines commuter rail projects both in and out of Connecticut that are considered to have applications that may be relevant to the Danbury Branch.
    [Show full text]
  • Financial Analyses Included Herein Present the Operating Revenues and Expenses Only for Those Properties Governed by the State Lease Agreements
    SSSeeewwwaaarrrddd aaannnddd Monde CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS RAIL GOVERNANCE STUDY Task 4.3 – Financial Review Connecticut Department of Transportation Table of Contents INTRODUCTION ........... ............... ............... ......................... ............... 1 - 3 OVERVIEW OF ALL STATIONS ............... ............... ......................... ............... 4 - 8 STATION COMPARISON ANALYSIS Five Year Totals ............... ............... ......................... ............... 9 Year end June 30, 1996 ............... ............... ......................... ............... 10 Year end June 30, 1997 ............... ............... ......................... ............... 11 Year end June 30, 1998 ............... ............... ......................... ............... 12 Year end June 30, 1999 ............... ............... ......................... ............... 13 Year end June 30, 2000 ............... ............... ......................... ............... 14 STATIONS - NEW HAVEN LINE Main Line New Haven Finances ........... ............... ............... ......................... ............... 15 - 19 Station and Parking Operations Profit (Loss) - 1996--2000 ............... 20 - 22 Milford Finances ........... ............... ............... ......................... ............... 23 - 25 Station and Parking Operations Profit (Loss) - 1996--2000 ............... 26 - 28 Stratford Finances ........... ............... ............... ......................... ............... 29 - 31 Station and Parking
    [Show full text]
  • Branchville Individual Station Report
    BRANCHVILLE TRAIN STATION VISUAL INSPECTION REPORT January 2007 Prepared by the Bureau of Public Transportation Connecticut Department of Transportation Branchville Train Station Visual Inspection Report January 2007 Overview: The Branchville Train Station is located on Route 7 in the southeast corner of Ridgefield. It is relatively easy to find, although a station sign is needed at each of the two entrances. Vehicular access is provided over two river bridges in varied stages of disrepair. The station is nestled between the Norwalk River, the railroad tracks, Depot Road and Portland Avenue. The station building houses a bakery and gift shop. New sidewalk and black railing separate the full parking lot from the tracks. An awning provides some shelter for patrons of the bakery or waiting commuters. The area is neat, likely from the housekeeping efforts of bakery personnel. A high-level platform with stairs and a ramp provides access to the rail cars. The platform has a full-length canopy and benches. Maintenance Responsibilities: Owner: State Operator: Town Platform Lights: Metro-North Trash: Metro-North Snow Removal: Town Shelter Glazing: Town Platform Canopy: Town Platform Structure: Town Parking: Town Page 2 Branchville Train Station Visual Inspection Report January 2007 Station Layout: Aerial Photo by Aero-Metric, Inc. – Graphics by Urbitran as part of the Rail Governance Study Station Building State-Owned Parking Area Page 3 Branchville Train Station Visual Inspection Report January 2007 Train Station Visual Inspection Parameters: The Connecticut Department of Transportation (Department) recently inspected all 36 New Haven Line train stations to assess their appearance, safety, means of access and overall condition.
    [Show full text]
  • Danbury Branch Improvement Program Task 5
    W FTA ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS DRAFT/FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT DANBURY BRANCH IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM TASK 5 ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM STATE PROJECT 302-008 SECTION 18: VISUAL RESOURCES MAY 2009 State Project No. 302-008 Connecticut Department of Transportation Danbury Branch Improvement Program AA/DEIS SECTION 18. VISUAL RESOURCES INTRODUCTION This section describes the visual resources in the study corridor. Visual resources contribute greatly to environmental quality, shaping the views and aesthetic experiences of people’s daily lives. Visual resources include natural landscape elements as well as features of the built environment. The quality of the visual experience depends on many factors, including the physical attributes of objects, the combination of objects and features in view, the location of visual elements in relation to the viewer, the condition of the elements, their uniqueness, viewer perceptions, and cultural connotations, among many others. Descriptions of landscape characteristics and features under existing conditions lay the groundwork for evaluating the effects of a project on the visual environment. Regulatory Context There are no federal and state laws that specifically protect visual resources across the board. There are, however, several important references to visual resources within the context of historic preservation and coastal zone management statutes. The implications of these legal protections are described below. At the Federal level, the following legislation is relevant to the project:
    [Show full text]
  • Train Station Models Building Guide 2018
    Building Guide for Season’s Greenings: All Aboard! 1 Index of buildings and dioramas Biltmore Depot North Carolina Page 3 Metro-North Cannondale Station Connecticut Page 4 Central Railroad of New Jersey Terminal New Jersey Page 5 Chattanooga Train Shed Tennessee Page 6 Cincinnati Union Terminal Ohio Page 7 Citrus Groves Florida Page 8 Dino Depot -- Page 9 East Glacier Park Station Montana Page 10 Ellicott City Station Maryland Page 11 Gettysburg Lincoln Railroad Station Pennsylvania Page 12 Grain Elevator Minnesota Page 13 Grain Fields Kansas Page 14 Grand Canyon Depot Arizona Page 15 Grand Central Terminal New York Page 16 Kirkwood Missouri Pacific Depot Missouri Page 17 Lahaina Station Hawaii Page 18 Los Angeles Union Station California Page 19 Michigan Central Station Michigan Page 20 North Bennington Depot Vermont Page 21 North Pole Village -- Page 22 Peanut Farms Alabama Page 23 Pennsylvania Station (interior) New York Page 24 Pikes Peak Cog Railway Colorado Page 25 Point of Rocks Station Maryland Page 26 Salt Lake City Union Pacific Depot Utah Page 27 Santa Fe Depot California Page 28 Santa Fe Depot Oklahoma Page 29 Union Station Washington Page 30 Union Station D.C. Page 31 Viaduct Hotel Maryland Page 32 Vicksburg Railroad Barge Mississippi Page 33 2 Biltmore Depot Asheville, North Carolina built 1896 Building Materials Roof: pine bark Facade: bark Door: birch bark, willow, saltcedar Windows: willow, saltcedar Corbels: hollowed log Porch tread: cedar Trim: ash bark, willow, eucalyptus, woody pear fruit, bamboo, reed, hickory nut Lettering: grapevine Chimneys: jequitiba fruit, Kielmeyera fruit, Schima fruit, acorn cap credit: Village Wayside Bar & Grille Wayside Village credit: Designed by Richard Morris Hunt, one of the premier architects in American history, the Biltmore Depot was commissioned by George Washington Vanderbilt III.
    [Show full text]
  • Connecticut State Rail Plan, 2012
    DRAFT 2012 CONNECTICUT STATE RAIL PLAN __________________________________________________________________ THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY BLANK Page 1 DRAFT 2012 CONNECTICUT STATE RAIL PLAN __________________________________________________________________ State of Connecticut Department of Transportation 2012-2016 Connecticut State Rail Plan Prepared by: BUREAU OF PUBLIC TRANSPORATION, OFFICE OF RAIL CONNECTICUT DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 50 UNION AVENUE, FOURTH FLOOR WEST NEW HAVEN, CONNECTICUT 06519 Page 2 DRAFT 2012 CONNECTICUT STATE RAIL PLAN __________________________________________________________________ TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES .......................................................................................................... 5 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................ 7 CHAPTER 1 – STATE RAIL VISION, GOALS, AND OBJECTIVES .............................. 9 1.1 MISSION STATEMENT, VISION, AND VALUES ........................................................................ 9 1.2 GOALS AND OBJECTIVES FOR RAIL SERVICE IN CONNECTICUT ..................................... 10 CHAPTER 2 – FEDERAL AND STATE MANDATES .................................................. 13 2.1 FEDERAL LEGISLATION AND PLANNING REQUIREMENTS ................................................ 14 2.2 STATE LEGISLATION AND PLANNING REQUIREMENTS ..................................................... 15 CHAPTER 3 – DESCRIPTION OF RAIL SYSTEM IN CONNECTICUT ....................... 18
    [Show full text]
  • Customer Opinion Survey Final Report
    Task 1.2: Customer Opinion Survey Final Report URBITRANR EPORT URBITRAN Prepared to Connecticut Department of Transportation S ubmitted by Urbitran Associates, Inc. May 2003 Task 1.2:Technical Memorandum Customer Opinion Survey TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY OF FINDINGS ............................................................................................1 BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE ....................................................................................................................................1 METHODOLOGY.........................................................................................................................................................1 FINDINGS ..................................................................................................................................................................1 EXHIBIT 1: SURVEY SAMPLE.....................................................................................................................................2 COMPARISON TO METRO-NORTH RAILROAD CUSTOMER OPINION SURVEY ...........................................................10 CHAPTER ONE: GENERAL PROFILE OF SURVEY RESPONDENTS.........................................................12 SYSTEM-WIDE ANALYSIS OF SURVEY QUESTIONS 1, 2, AND 3 .................................................................................13 SYSTEM-WIDE ANALYSIS OF SURVEY QUESTIONS 4, 5, 6, AND 7 .............................................................................15 SYSTEM-WIDE ANALYSIS OF SURVEY
    [Show full text]
  • Ridgefield Encyclopedia (5-15-2020)
    A compendium of more than 3,500 people, places and things relating to Ridgefield, Connecticut. by Jack Sanders [Note: Abbreviations and sources are explained at the end of the document. This work is being constantly expanded and revised; this version was last updated on 5-15-2020.] A A&P: The Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea Company opened a small grocery store at 378 Main Street in 1948 (long after liquor store — q.v.); became a supermarket at 46 Danbury Road in 1962 (now Walgreens site); closed November 1981. [JFS] A&P Liquor Store: Opened at 133½ Main Street Sept. 12, 1935. [P9/12/1935] Aaron’s Court: short, dead-end road serving 9 of 10 lots at 45 acre subdivision on the east side of Ridgebury Road by Lewis and Barry Finch, father-son, who had in 1980 proposed a corporate park here; named for Aaron Turner (q.v.), circus owner, who was born nearby. [RN] A Better Chance (ABC) is Ridgefield chapter of a national organization that sponsors talented, motivated children from inner-cities to attend RHS; students live at 32 Fairview Avenue; program began 1987. A Birdseye View: Column in Ridgefield Press for many years, written by Duncan Smith (q.v.) Abbe family: Lived on West Lane and West Mountain, 1935-36: James E. Abbe, noted photographer of celebrities, his wife, Polly Shorrock Abbe, and their three children Patience, Richard and John; the children became national celebrities when their 1936 book, “Around the World in Eleven Years.” written mostly by Patience, 11, became a bestseller. [WWW] Abbot, Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Mta Property Listing for Nys Reporting
    3/31/2021 3:48 PM MTA PROPERTY LISTING FOR NYS REPORTING COUNTY SECTN BLOCKNO LOTNO Property_Code PROPERTYNAME PROPERTYADDDRESS AGENCY LINE PROPERTYTYPE limaster LIRR Customer Abstract Property LIRR Customer Abstract Property LIR Main Line Station Bronx bbl05200 Bronx Whitestone Bridge Hutchson River parkway BT Block/Lot Bridge Bronx 9 mha04650 ROW b 125th & Melrose XXX St MN Harlem ROW Bronx 9 mha06600 ROW b 125th & Melrose Milepost 5,Sta-Mon# 31.5 MN Harlem ROW Bronx 12 mha09500 FORDHAM STATION Fordham Rd (Fordham U) MN Harlem Station Bronx mhu00343 Perm E'ment at Yankee Stadium Sta-mon 30.5 MN Hudson Payable Easement Bronx mhu06251 Spuyten Duyvil Substation Sta-Mon# 68.5 MN Hudson Payable Easement Bronx 19 mhu06301 Parking at Riverdale Milepost 12 , Sta-Mon# 68.5 MN Hudson Parking Bronx tbl03600 Unionport Shop Unionport Rd. NYCT White Plains Road Shop Bronx tbl65340 Con Edison Ducts East 174 St NYCT Block/Lot Ducts Bronx tbw32500 231ST 231 St-Broadway NYCT Broadway/7th Avenue Station Bronx tbw32600 238 ST 238 St-Broadway NYCT Broadway/7th Avenue Station Bronx tbw32700 242 ST 242 St-Van Cortlandt Pk NYCT Broadway/7th Avenue Station Bronx tco21000 161 ST Yankee Stadium 161 St/River Ave NYCT Concourse Station Bronx tco21100 167 ST 167 St/Grand Concourse NYCT Concourse Station Bronx tco21200 170 ST 170 St/Grand Concourse NYCT Concourse Station Bronx tco21300 174 175 STs 174-175 Sts/Grand Concourse NYCT Concourse Station Bronx tco21400 TREMONT AVE Tremont Ave/Grand Concourse NYCT Concourse Station Bronx tco21500 182 183 STs 183 St/Grand
    [Show full text]
  • HVCEO Regional Bike Plan
    January 2015 PREPARED FOR: HVCEO Housatonic Valley Council of Elected O f f i c i a l s BY: HARTransit GREATER DANBURY REGIONAL BIKE PLAN FINAL REPORT January 2015 This document was prepared in cooperation with the Federal Transit Administration and the Connecticut Department of Transportation. The opinions, findings, and conclusions expressed in this publication are those of the Housatonic Valley Council of Elected Officials and do not necessarily reflect the official views or policies of the Connecticut Department of Transportation or the Federal Transit Administration. Prepared for HVCEO by Eric C. Bergstraesser, Chief Executive Officer Report Staff Richard A. Schreiner, Director of Service Development Stephanie A. Scavelli, Transportation Planner Andrew C. O’Connell, Marketing and Public Relations Coordinator George Blake, HVCEO Geographic Information Systems Manager ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The authors acknowledge the following people for their expertise, invaluable support, and generous assistance on the development of this project. Apologies extended for any omissions: Betty Brosius Jonathan Chew Jacqui Dowd Dave and Marti Fine Sandy Fry Francisco Gomes (Fitzgerald & Halliday, Inc.) Stuart Green Lukas Herbert Alex Karman Amy Mangold Tom O’Brien Sharon Okoye David Pattee John Pilner Katherine Rattan Paul Roche Cover Photo: A sharrow marking on the pavement alerts drivers to a designated shared roadway along Housatonic Avenue in New Milford, CT. TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE 1 OVERVIEW AND POLICY OBJECTIVES …………………………… 1 1.1 Introduction ……...................................................................................... 1 1.2 Relevant Federal and State of Connecticut Programs and Policies …….. 4 1.3 Demographics …………………………………………………………... 8 1.4 Bicycle Crash Data ……………………………………………………... 10 1.5 Special Concerns in Bicycle Planning …….............................................. 15 2 INVENTORY OF ROUTES AND PLANS ……………………………..
    [Show full text]
  • Route 7 Transportation and Land Use Study Is to Consider the Integration of All of Travel Modes and Travel Choices in the Corridor
    Transportation and 6 ROUTEI-84 Route 7 Land Use Study Danbury Transportation & Land Use Study New York State Route 7 Recommended Transportation Corridor Segments and Land Use Plan & Villages 302 Bethel 7 35 53 Redding 58 Norwalk River Ridgefield 107 102 Branchville Georgetown 57 33 Weston Legend Cannondale Rural/Preservation Suburban- Wilton Sub-urban Node 136 Urban Edge Wilton Center Town/ Village Center 0 1 2 3 Miles N 123 106 15 124 33 New 137 Westport Canaan 53 1 104 I-95 Norwalk Prepared for SWRPA and HVCEO HOUSATONIC VALLEY COUNCIL OF Fitzgerald & Halliday, Inc. E LECTED SWRPASouth Western Regional Planning Agency June 2011 O FFICIALS Table of Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................... ES-1 Chapter 1: Introduction ............................................................................. 1-1 1 - 1. Purpose ...................................................................................... 1-1 1 - 2. Public Involvement ...................................................................... 1-1 1 - 3. Route 7 - 2030 Vision .................................................................. 1-2 1 - 4. Route 7 Guiding Principles ..........................................................1-3 1 - 5. Study Area Overview/Regional Context .......................................1-4 1 - 6. Summary of Existing Conditions ...................................................1-6 Transportation System Gaps and Opportunities ............................1-6 Land-Use and Development
    [Show full text]
  • Housatonic Valley Council of Elected Officials
    GREATER DANBURY COMMUTER RAIL PARKING PLAN October 2012 This document was prepared in cooperation with the Federal Transit Administration and the Connecticut Department of Transportation. The opinions, findings, and conclusions expressed in this publication are those of the Housatonic Valley Council of Elected Officials and do not necessarily reflect the official views or policies of the Connecticut Department of Transportation or the Federal Transit Administration. Prepared for HVCEO by Eric C. Bergstraesser, Chief Executive Officer Report Staff Richard A. Schreiner, Director of Service Development Paul Chenard, Transportation Planner Andrew C. O’Connell, Marketing and Public Relations Coordinator TABLE OF CONTENTS I. RAILROAD STATIONS IN THE HVCEO REGION 1 1. Introduction 1 2. Overview of Housatonic Region Railroad Stations 2 3. Expansion of the Danbury Branch Line and Parking Impacts 5 II. EXISTING HOUSATONIC REGION RAILROAD STATIONS 8 1. Branchville Railroad Station 8 2. West Redding Railroad Station 14 3. Bethel Railroad Station 18 4. Danbury Railroad Station 22 III. PROPOSED HOUSATONIC REGION RAILROAD STATIONS 25 1. Georgetown Railroad Station 25 2. Brookfield Railroad Station 28 3. New Milford Railroad Station 30 Housatonic Valley Council of Elected Officials I. RAILROAD STATIONS IN THE HVCEO REGION 1. Introduction This text is a summary of current conditions and recommended parking enhancements to Danbury Branch Line railroad stations in the Housatonic Valley (Greater Danbury) Planning Region. Note that the Branch Line extends through two of Connecticut's planning regions, from Norwalk and Wilton in the South Western Region northerly through Redding and Ridgefield to Danbury in the Housatonic Valley Region. Existing and Proposed Railroad Stations in the Housatonic Region There are seven Danbury Branch Line stations from south to north with one in Norwalk, two in Wilton, then one each in Ridgefield (Branchville), West Redding, Bethel and Danbury.
    [Show full text]