DOCSLIB.ORG

Gloucestershire Fire and Rescue Service

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Gloucestershire Fire and Rescue Service “Working Together for a Safer Gloucestershire” Integrated Risk Management Plan 2015 - 2018 www.glosfire.gov.uk/irmp Contents Introduction 1 What is an Integrated Risk Management Plan (IRMP)? 2 What have we achieved through our last IRMP? 3 Risk in Gloucestershire 5 How we currently manage risk 8 How we can continue to improve our risk management 20 Have your say 22 Action Plan 2015-2018 23 Our Mission: Working Together for a Safer Gloucestershire “GFRS Mission statement:” Working together we will provide the highest standard of community safety and emergency “ response services to the communities of Gloucestershire ” Introduction Welcome to the Gloucestershire Fire & Rescue Since our last plan, which we published in 2012 we Service 2015-18 Integrated Risk Management have been set new challenges in reducing costs Plan (IRMP). This is my first IRMP as your Chief and becoming even more efficient. Influences such Fire Officer. I am determined that it will build as those financial demands and the conclusions on the achievements of previous IRMPs and drawn by the Peer Challenge led me to commission will make the lives of the people of a Strategic Review of the Service shortly after taking Gloucestershire safer. over my role. The review has now concluded and recommended a fresh delivery model which aims to Although we continue to face financial challenges, put greater emphasis on prevention work, helping Stewart Edgar QFSM we can continue to be proud of the Fire & Rescue people to avoid having fires and other emergencies, Chief Fire Officer Service here in Gloucestershire. The recent Peer thereby reducing costs by reducing demand on and Operations Director Challenge, during which a team of respected the Service. We are calling this fresh approach a professionals from both a Fire & Rescue Service ‘Demand Management Service Delivery Model’ and background and other walks of life took an in-depth are currently in the process of changing the Service look at the Service, described Gloucestershire Fire & structure to enable us to put the model into action. Rescue Service as ‘highly committed’, ‘proud’, ‘well regarded’ and ‘ambitious’. We continue to be one As a Service that has serving our community at its of the highest performing and lowest cost-per-head heart, we have a clear set of strategic aims: Services in the country. Cllr Will Windsor-Clive Cabinet Member for Fire, Planning & Infrastructure Prevention Response People Performance & Protection & Resilience I hope that this plan gives you a clear understanding of how your Fire & Rescue Service is moving toward a future that will bring better outcomes for you, both in terms of your safety but also in terms of the pressure on your bank balance. 1 What is an Integrated Risk Management Plan? As required by the Fire & Rescue Services Act • What opportunities are there for improvement 2004 the Government outlines its expectations and setting of appropriate standards? of English Fire & Rescue Services through the • What resources are necessary to meet National Framework for Fire & Rescue Services those standards? (https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/ we then build a plan based on the answers to fire-and-rescue-national-framework- those questions. for-england). One of the Governments expectations is the assessment of local risks The IRMP incorporates a three-year action plan to life and how effectively those resources are to manage the changes/improvements to Service used in response to those risks, at the same provision identified through the planning process. time providing value for money to the local taxpayer – this is called an Integrated Risk Once the plan has been agreed by Cabinet the Management Plan (IRMP). All Fire & Rescue Service will consult with the community and their Services have to produce a local IRMP that representatives over the plan. sets out their plan for: The IRMP is all about giving the community a • Reducing the number and severity of fires, road ‘tailor made’ Service that best meets their needs traffic collisions and other emergency incidents but cannot do so without taking into account occurring in the area for which it is responsible; realities such as the current financial climate. • Reducing the severity of injuries due to In order to effectively manage risk in our fires, road traffic collisions and other community the Service uses a combination of emergency incidents; tactics, which compliment each-other to deliver the • Reducing the commercial, economic and social Services strategic aims. It is the ‘integrated’ nature impact of fires and other emergency incidents; of these risk management tactics in the optimum • Safeguarding the environment and heritage blend, linked with the strategic aims, that gives the (both built and natural); plan its name. • Providing value for money. The IRMP also outlines the improvements and The IRMP development process makes the changes the Service plans to make in order Service regularly consider four key questions: to manage existing and emerging risk more effectively. The route to those improvements is • What are the existing and potential risks in outlined within the associated action plan which Gloucestershire? will explain the ‘what, how and when’. • How effective are our current risk management measures? 2 the completion of four What have we achieved new fire stations in through our last IRMP? “the Gloucester and Cheltenham areas has IRMP 2012/15 Objective What we have done Replace specialist Following the introduction of the new pump/rescue improved the rescue appliance appliances the specialist rescue appliance was removed from service. The new specialist incident emergency cover support unit is now in service and supports the pump/rescue appliances when required. we give in those areas Improve the efficiency of A review of crewing arrangements for our Aerial the crewing for our aerial Ladder Platforms was undertaken leading to a appliances revised approach which guarantees availability of at least one of these appliances whilst allowing for a ” more efficient use of staff. Improve our response The completion of the four new fire stations in the standards and coverage Gloucester and Cheltenham areas has improved the emergency cover we give in those areas and has improved the support they give to surrounding stations. As part of this project we set ourselves challenging response standards which has driven improved performance. 3 IRMP 2012/15 Objective What we have done partnership working Improve how we carry out The traditional approach to large animal rescue animal rescues has been questioned and a new ‘safe system of with the Severn Area work’ adopted using a range of new equipment and techniques. All firefighters have been given Rescue Association basic training and specialist teams established who “ have had level 2 training and will lead a rescue. In support of the firefighters partnerships have been has led to the formed with vets. establishment of a joint Improve our water rescue The Service now provides a national response to response water emergencies and a more extensive response Water Rescue Centre within Gloucestershire with additional water rescue teams at Moreton In Marsh and Fairford. at the fire station in Significant investment in equipment has lead to the replacement of boats and ground-breaking Tewkesbury partnership working with the Severn Area Rescue Association has led to the establishment of a joint Water Rescue Centre at the fire station in Tewkesbury. Review the availability of Historically each retained fire station has had a firefighters at each retained specified number of staff as an ‘establishment’ ” station linked to the number of fire engines based there i.e. 1 fire engine - 12 Firefighters, 2 fire engines - 20 Firefighters. The review has lead to a complete change of approach now leading to a variable ‘establishment’ driven by the patterns of cover provided by individual Firefighters. This approach is more testing managerially but is also more efficient in terms of resources. 4 Risk in Gloucestershire Our existing and potential risks Our risk information comes from various sources. in Cheltenham and Gloucester. The remainder are It informs our professional judgments when we spread over a number of market towns, as well decide on the most suitable protection, prevention as many small villages and hamlets. Population and emergency response arrangements to put in growth is steady and is predicted to rise by place, to maintain that risk at an acceptable level. another 11% by 2025. However, Gloucestershire is predicted to have a higher than average number of What are the risks? over 65 year olds rising by 55,000 to reach 158,000 • Injury or death to residents and visitors by 2025. This increase in a higher risk group, coupled with the government desire to deliver • Damage to property ‘personalised’ services to the elderly will have a • Impact on the economy of Gloucestershire and direct impact on the County’s ability to support and disruption to business deliver services, such as nursing and social care, • Loss of built and natural heritage that support safe and independent living. • Social impact on communities While the County has areas of affluence, there • Firefighter safety are some pockets of significant deprivation in • Loss of infrastructure Cheltenham and Gloucester with some rural deprivation in the Forest of Dean. There is a About our County proven link between social deprivation and Gloucestershire is a county of contrasts. Covering incidence of fire. 2,653 square km and with a population of In the last 10 years population growth has been approximately 597,000. concentrated in the urban areas. However, Gloucestershire is an attractive place to live, there is now a developing tendency towards work and invest, the rural and urban mix featuring dispersed residential development, which will carry excellent transport links, historic heritage and implications for service delivery in that it takes leisure opportunities attracts people to the area.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Gloucestershire Economic Needs Assessment
    GL5078P Gloucestershire ENA For and on behalf of Cheltenham Borough Council Cotswold District Council Forest of Dean District Council Gloucester City Council Stroud District Council Tewkesbury Borough Council Gloucestershire Economic Needs Assessment Prepared by Strategic Planning Research Unit DLP Planning Ltd August 2020 1 08.19.GL5078PS.Gloucestershire ENA Final GL5078P Gloucestershire ENA Prepared by: Checked by: Approved by: Date: July 2020 Office: Bristol & Sheffield Strategic Planning Research Unit V1 Velocity Building Broad Quay House (6th Floor) 4 Abbey Court Ground Floor Prince Street Fraser Road Tenter Street Bristol Priory Business Park Sheffield BS1 4DJ Bedford S1 4BY MK44 3WH Tel: 01142 289190 Tel: 01179 058850 Tel: 01234 832740 DLP Consulting Group disclaims any responsibility to the client and others in respect of matters outside the scope of this report. This report has been prepared with reasonable skill, care and diligence. This report is confidential to the client and DLP Planning Ltd accepts no responsibility of whatsoever nature to third parties to whom this report or any part thereof is made known. Any such party relies upon the report at their own risk. 2 08.19.GL5078PS.Gloucestershire ENA Final GL5078P Gloucestershire ENA CONTENTS PAGE 0.0 Executive Summary .......................................................................................................... 6 1.0 Introduction...................................................................................................................... 19 a) National
    [Show full text]
  • The Gloucestershire Urban Economic Strategy 2007-2015
    DRAFT Gloucestershire First 26 April 07 THE GLOUCESTERSHIRE URBAN ECONOMIC STRATEGY 2007-2015 INTRODUCTION 1. Urban Gloucestershire lies astride the M5 and is made up of Gloucester City, Cheltenham Borough and parts of the Borough of Tewkesbury and Stroud District. With a total population of 310,800 and forecast by 2026 to be at least 370,800 this is a significant urban conurbation particularly in regional terms, as evidenced by the identification of Gloucester and Cheltenham in the draft Regional Spatial Strategy (RSS) as two of the regionally Strategically Significant Cities and Towns (SSCTs)1. Within the Gloucestershire economy this urban area plays a vital role. Defining Urban Gloucestershire Urban Gloucestershire cannot be delineated precisely on a map without limiting some initiatives unnecessarily. In general it is those geographical areas of the Central Vale that have a concentration of people and businesses that by working together can complement one another and increase the economy of Gloucestershire. It therefore includes the whole of Gloucester City and Cheltenham Borough. It also will generally include, within Tewkesbury Borough, Tewkesbury Town and Ashchurch as well as the parishes of Brockworth, Hucclecote, Churchdown, Innsworth, Longford and embraces Gloucestershire Airport and Dowty/Smiths, although there are some aspects of these that are also 'rural' and will also be covered by the Gloucestershire Rural Economic Strategy. Similarly it will also generally include in Stroud District the settlements of Hardwicke and those others that comprise the defined Stroud Urban Area: Stonehouse, Stroud, Thrupp, North and South Woodchester and Nailsworth, although parts of these are also 'rural'. Economic and administrative boundaries are not identical.
    [Show full text]
  • Review of the BAE Systems Aviation Options Report for Filton Airfield
    South Gloucestershire Review of the BAE Systems Aviation Options Report for Filton Airfield December 2011 South Gloucestershire Council Filton Airfield Purpose 1. To report the conclusions of work undertaken in response to the Full Council Question No.3 dated 19th October 2011, in respect of Filton Airfield. Background 2. In April 2011 BAE Systems Ltd announced its decision to close Filton Airfield at the end of 2012. That decision has significant implications for the District and wider area including the programme for the Council’s emerging Core Strategy. 3. The Council has in the period since April 2011 undertaken widespread engagement to listen to the wide ranging views being expressed in response to the closure announcement and to better understand the issues which arise from BAE Systems Ltd decision to close the airfield. 4. The Council is committed to having its Core Strategy ‘examined’ by an independent Inspector at the earliest reasonable opportunity with view to adoption of the Core Strategy in the summer of 2012 if possible. The consequences of not having an adopted core strategy are far reaching. It is therefore very important that both the position in respect of Filton Airfield and more generally are resolved as quickly as possible. 5. In order to better understand the reasons advanced by BAE Systems Ltd for closing the Airfield, and to explain that decision as part of the engagement process, the Council invited the Company to prepare and publish an Aviation Options Report. This summarises the key information and aviation options considered and which led BAE Systems Ltd to conclude that the Airfield is not thought to be viable or needed.
    [Show full text]
  • Gloucestershire's Local Transport Plan 2011-26
    Gloucestershire’s Local Transport Plan 2011-26 Promoting a safe and sustainable transport system Contents Foreword 1. Summary 2. Background to LTP3 3. Transport in Gloucestershire 4. Consultation and Option Assessment 5. A Greener Healthier Gloucestershire 6. Delivering Sustainable Economic Growth 7. A Safer Securer Transport System 8. Good Access To Services 9. Managing Our Highways 10. Area Transport Strategies 11. Delivery of LTP3 12. Monitoring Progress 13. Glossary 14 Supporting Documents Gloucestershire’s Local Transport Plan 2011-26 Promoting a safe and sustainable transport system Foreword Welcome to the Local Transport Plan for Gloucestershire (LTP3), which sets out the transport strategy for the County from 2011 to 2026. Our vision for transport in the future is: “Providing a safe and sustainable transport network within Gloucestershire” where safe means a transport network that people feel safe and secure using and sustainable means a transport network that is both environmentally and financially sustainable. It is the most challenging Local Transport Plan we have developed as it comes into being during a time when we have to make efficiencies to help reduce the national debt and get the most out of limited resources. LTP3 has been produced in accordance with guidance that sets out the Government‟s priorities for transport as well as indications of the level of funding that might be available to invest in local transport. This funding is likely to reduce as the new Government addresses the national financial position and we have framed the LTP3 strategy to reflect this. Everybody relies on there being a safe and sustainable transport system to allow them to access, or provide, the services that society needs to properly function.
    [Show full text]
  • Communications Roads Cheltenham Lies on Routes Connecting the Upper Severn Vale with the Cotswolds to the East and Midlands to the North
    DRAFT – VCH Gloucestershire 15 [Cheltenham] Communications Roads Cheltenham lies on routes connecting the upper Severn Vale with the Cotswolds to the east and Midlands to the north. Several major ancient routes passed nearby, including the Fosse Way, White Way and Salt Way, and the town was linked into this important network of roads by more local, minor routes. Cheltenham may have been joined to the Salt Way running from Droitwich to Lechlade1 by Saleweistrete,2 or by the old coach road to London, the Cheltenham end of which was known as Greenway Lane;3 the White Way running north from Cirencester passed through Sandford.4 The medieval settlement of Cheltenham was largely ranged along a single high street running south-east and north-west, with its church and manorial complex adjacent to the south, and burgage plots (some still traceable in modern boundaries) running back from both frontages.5 Documents produced in the course of administering the liberty of Cheltenham refer to the via regis, the king’s highway, which is likely to be a reference to this public road running through the liberty. 6 Other forms include ‘the royal way at Herstret’ and ‘the royal way in the way of Cheltenham’ (in via de Cheltenham). Infringements recorded upon the via regis included digging and ploughing, obstruction with timbers and dungheaps, the growth of trees and building of houses.7 The most important local roads were those running from Cheltenham to Gloucester, and Cheltenham to Winchcombe, where the liberty administrators were frequently engaged in defending their lords’ rights. Leland described the roads around Cheltenham, Gloucester and Tewkesbury as ‘subject to al sodeyne risings of Syverne, so that aftar reignes it is very foule to 1 W.S.
    [Show full text]
  • UPDATE 2018 Strategic Economic Plan for Gloucestershire 2.0 Contents
    Strategic Economic Plan for Gloucestershire 2.0 UPDATE 2018 Strategic Economic Plan for Gloucestershire 2.0 Contents Contents Page Introduction from our Chair, Dr Diane Savory OBE DL 2 Executive Summary 3 - 5 1.0 Gloucestershire 6 1.1 Gloucestershire: 2018 - A prosperous and resilient economy 6 - 11 1.2 SWOT 12 1.3 Developing clear Strategic Priorities 13 1.3.1 Key Strategic Priority Projects. 14 1.4 Delivery of our Strategic Economic Plan (SEP). 15 1.4.1 Key Strategic Priority Projects. 15 - 22 1.4.2 Enablers for Growth. 23 - 28 1.5 Plans for Growth: enablers 29 - 30 1.6 What we are delivering as a result of our investments 31 1.7 Local Partnership Working 32 1.8 Our Asks to Government: Update. 33 - 37 1.9 European Structural and Investment Fund (ESIF) 38 - 42 2.0 Realising Gloucestershire’s potential 43 - 45 3.0 Governance and leadership 46 - 47 1 4.0 Acknowledgements 48 Strategic Economic Plan for Gloucestershire 2.0 Introduction from our Chair, Dr Diane Savory OBE DL “The last 12 months have seen unprecedented positive change and growth within the great county of Gloucestershire. GFirst LEP and its affiliated project partners have continued to ensure that projects are delivered on time, within budget and most importantly continue to help drive sustainable economic growth within Gloucestershire. The creation of the LEP Strategic Economic Plan in 2014 cemented our intentions and a variety of worthy and exciting projects received Local Growth Funding. Many of these projects have now come to fruition in 2018 including; the Growth Hub Network roll out across the county, the new GlosCol Campus in Cinderford, the Gloucester Transport Hub and the Elmbridge Court Roundabout to name but a few.
    [Show full text]
  • Strategic Economic Plan for Gloucestershire Contents
    90 Strategic Economic Plan for Gloucestershire Contents Foreword page 3 1 Introduction pages 4-5 1.5 What we will deliver pages 19-20 1.1 Gloucestershire pages 6-8 1.6 Our ‘ask’ of government pages 21-27 1.2 SWOT page 9 1.7 VFM summary statement pages 28-30 1.3 Developing clear strategic priorities page 10 1.8 Local Partnership Working page 31 1.4 Plans for Growth 1.9 Alignment with EU Structural and Investment Funds page 31 1.4.1 Flagship Projects pages 11-13 Introduction 1.4.2 Enablers for Growth pages 14-18 2. Key Facts & Data page 32-33 4.2.3 Broadband and Mobile Phone Networks page 69 2.1 Areas of High Growth Potential page 34 4.2.4 Planning (Collaboration) page 70 2.2 Supporting Evidence page 35 4.2.5 Housing page 71 3. Opportunities and Challenges page 36 4.2.6 Regeneration page 72-73 3.1 Opportunities page 36-39 5. Local Authority Contribution page 74 3.2 Challenges page 40-41 5.1 Financial support page 74 3.3 Building on our strengths and addressing our weaknesses page 42-45 5.2 Land assets and co-location page 75 4. Growth Programme page 46 5.3 Improvements to the planning process page 76 5.4 Supporting delivery page 76 4.1 Flagship Projects page 46 5.5 Governance page 76-78 4.1.1 Growth Hub page 46-51 9 0 4.1.2 Gloucestershire Renewable Energy, 6. Delivery Arrangements page 79 Engineering and Nuclear Skills Centre (GREEN) page 52-55 6.1 Sequencing and prioritisation page 80-81 Main document 4.1.3 Growth Zone page 56-58 6.2 Timeline page 82 4.2 Enablers for Growth page 59 6.3 Risk page 84-86 4.2.1 Transport Projects page 59 7.
    [Show full text]
  • Service Number 42/43
    4 | Transport Network Analysis SERVICE NUMBER 42/43 42 3 0 3 6 9 12 km Connecting Cheltenham - Baseline Report 107 4 | Transport Network Analysis SERVICE NUMBER 51 51 3 0 3 6 9 12 km 108 Connecting Cheltenham - Baseline Report 4 | Transport Network Analysis SERVICE NUMBER 93 93 3 0 3 6 9 12 km Connecting Cheltenham - Baseline Report 109 4 | Transport Network Analysis SERVICE NUMBER 94 94 3 0 3 6 9 12 km 110 Connecting Cheltenham - Baseline Report 4 | Transport Network Analysis SERVICE NUMBER 94U 94U 3 0 3 6 9 12 km Connecting Cheltenham - Baseline Report 111 4 | Transport Network Analysis SERVICE NUMBER 97 97 3 0 3 6 9 12 km 112 Connecting Cheltenham - Baseline Report 4 | Transport Network Analysis SERVICE NUMBER 99 99 3 0 3 6 9 12 km Connecting Cheltenham - Baseline Report 113 114 Connecting Cheltenham - Baseline Report 5 | Disruptive Technologies Connecting Cheltenham - Baseline Report 115 5 | Disruptive Technologies DISRUPTIVE TECHNOLOGIES Transport is undergoing disruption. A variety of technological create more mobility and more car use at the expense of public of far fewer vehicles on the road in some future visions, in the advances are combining to offer both new forms of transportation transport, walking and cycling. In so doing, the commercial shorter term at least, the numbers of vehicles on the road may as well as radically changing the way services are delivered viability of public transport could be further eroded, exacerbating increase. and accessed. These include apps providing dynamic journey accessibility and inclusion for groups who can’t afford (or don’t planning and routeing information so that travellers can plan want to) engage with these new services, and we could end up The strategy should, therefore, try to prioritise shared transit, their journeys ‘on the go’ in response to real time network with more mobility, more congestion and more exclusion.
    [Show full text]
  • Gloucestershire 2050 Vision Consultation PDF 151 KB
    Meeting: Cabinet Date: 11 July 2018 Council 12 July 2018 Subject: Gloucestershire Vision 2050 Consultation Report Of: Managing Director Wards Affected: All Key Decision: No Budget/Policy Framework: No Contact Officer: Jon McGinty, Managing Director Email: [email protected] Tel: 39-6200 Appendices: 1. Vision 2050 Ambitions and Projects 2. Draft Consultation Response FOR GENERAL RELEASE 1.0 Purpose of Report 1.1 To consider the Gloucestershire Vision 2050 consultation and to decide whether to submit a response. 2.0 Recommendations 2.1 Cabinet is asked to RECOMMEND to Council that: (1) The Vision 2050 consultation be welcomed; (2) Council resolves to submit a response to the consultation on behalf of the Council. A draft response submission is attached at appendix B; (3) Authority be delegated to the Leader, in consultation with the other political Group leaders, to agree the final wording of any response submission and to submit any response by the end of July. 2.2 Council is asked to RESOLVE that (1) The Vision 2050 consultation be welcomed; (2) Council resolves to submit a response to the consultation on behalf of the Council. A possible response submission is attached at appendix B. (3) Authority be delegated to the Leader, in consultation with the other political Group leaders, to agree the final wording of any response submission and to submit any response by the end of July. 3.0 Background and Key Issues 3.1 Leadership Gloucestershire (LG) is an informal meeting of key Gloucestershire public sector and partner organisation leaders. They meet together to provide vision, leadership and strategic direction in those areas where it is vital for those organisations to work together to meet the needs of, and deliver better outcomes for, the people and communities of Gloucestershire.
    [Show full text]
  • The Big Conversation
    The Big Conversation Consultation and engagement report 21 September 2018 Client University of Gloucestershire Title The Big Conversation Subtitle Consultation and engagement report Dates last published 21/09/2018 last revised 21/09/2018 Status Released Version Version 1.0 Classification Open Project Code 10978 Author(s) Rob Francis, Skye McCool, Jane Simon, Anna McKeon, Joe Dickie, and James West Quality Assurance by Rob Francis Main point of contact Skye McCool Email [email protected] If you would like a large text version of this document, please contact us. This report has been produced by Traverse Ltd. t. 0207 239 7800 p. 252b Gray's Inn Road, London WC1X 8XG e. [email protected] w. www.traverse.ltd Contents Foreword by Vice Chancellor .................................................................. 1 Executive Summary ................................................................................. 3 PART A: ABOUT THE BIG CONVERSATION .......................................... 8 1. Introduction .......................................................................................... 8 2. How people got involved ................................................................... 11 PART B: FINDINGS ................................................................................. 19 3. What do people like most about Gloucestershire? ......................... 19 4. What do people like least about Gloucestershire? ......................... 22 5. Eight future challenges .....................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Where to Fly Guide & Corporate Member Listing
    AOPAAOPA WHERE TO FLY GUIDE & CORPORATE MEMBER LISTING The Pilot Centre Cambridge Flying Group Lands End Aero Club Denham Aerodrome Cambridge (Westward Airways) Denham Marshall’s Airport Lands End Aerodrome Uxbridge Newmarket Road St Just Middlesex UB9 5DF Cambridge CB5 8RX Penzance Tel: 01895 833838 Tel: 01223 293343 Cornwall TR19 7RL Fax: 01895 832267 Fax: 01223 294147 Tel: 01736 788771 Email: [email protected] Email: Fax: 01747 787651 BEDFORDSHIRE Website: www.egld.com/tpc [email protected] Email: flyingclub@islesofscilly- Bedfordshire School of Flying Website: travel.co.uk Piper Warrior 3 [email protected] Web:www.landsendairportco.uk Cranfield Airfield Cessna 152 5 Cranfield Cessna 172 1 Tiger Moth 2 Cessna 152 1 Bedfordshire MK43 0AL Cessna 182 1 Fuji RA200-180 1 Tel: 01234 752817 Cessna 152 Aerobat 1 Bellanca Citabria 1 Cessna 172 1 Fax: 01234 752809 NSF Sibson Email: [email protected] Wycombe Air Centre Ltd Sibson Aerodrome Website: www.cabairflyingschools.com Wycombe Air Park Wansford CUMBRIA Booker Peterborough Carlisle Flight Training Limited Grumman Cheetah 4 Marlow PE8 6NE Carlisle Airport Grumman Tiger 3 Buckinghamshire SL7 3DR Tel: 01832 280289 Grumman Cougar 1 Carlisle Tel: 01494 443737 Fax: 01832 280675 Cumbria CA6 4NW Piper Arrow 1 Fax: 01494 465456 Email: [email protected] Robinson R22 2 Tel: 01228 573344 / 07834 559560 Email: [email protected] Website: www.nsof.co.uk Email:[email protected] Website: wycombeaircentre.co.uk Cabair College of Training Robin
    [Show full text]
  • Pilots Flying Order Book
    Cotswold Aero Club PILOTS FLYING ORDER BOOK PILOTS FLYING ORDER BOOK Head of Training Signed: Page 1 of 122 Document No. CAC-0001 Issue No. 5, 30May 2015 Cotswold Aero Club PILOTS FLYING ORDER BOOK Preface Preface Cotswold Aero Club Ltd PILOTS FLYING ORDER BOOK All pilots are required to comply with The Air Navigation Order, Air Navigation (General) Regulations and the Rules of the Air. These rules and regulations are established to encourage a high standard of flying discipline and ensure flight safety. The Pilots Flying Orders give additional guidance to aid compliance with the rules and regulations. They also lay down procedures for the efficient day to day operation of the Cotswold Aero Club. All pilots must read this document and sign to indicate that they have done so upon first joining the Cotswold Aero Club and thereafter on an annual basis and when amended. Head of Training Signed Page 2 of 122 Document No. CAC-0001 Preface Issue No. 5, 30 May 2018 Cotswold Aero Club PILOTS FLYING ORDER BOOK Preface RECORD OF AMENDMENTS Copy No …….. Amendment No. Date Applicable Date Entered Entered By Distribution: Head of Training Signed Page 3 of 122 Document No. CAC-0001 Preface Issue No. 5, 30 May 2018 Cotswold Aero Club PILOTS FLYING ORDER BOOK Preface Copy No. 1 Head of Training (Master copy to be signed by all CAC staff and students) 2 CAA 3 Cotswold Aero Club Ltd Directors 4 Instructors 5 Students 6 Operations 7 Spare Head of Training Signed Page 4 of 122 Document No. CAC-0001 Preface Issue No.
    [Show full text]