DOCSLIB.ORG

PDF Download Writing Southern Politics Contemporary

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
PDF Download Writing Southern Politics Contemporary WRITING SOUTHERN POLITICS CONTEMPORARY INTERPRETATIONS AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS 1ST EDITION PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Robert P Steed | 9780813123820 | | | | | Writing Southern Politics Contemporary Interpretations and Future Directions 1st edition PDF Book Reference sellers 42, items. Scholars, journalists, writers, and pundits have long regarded the South as the nation's most politically distinctive region. Mystery sellers , items. Avidit Acharya is assistant professor of political science at Stanford University. Gardening sellers 19, items. Coker — Arthur N. Art sellers , items. Steed , Laurence W. Race and Class in Texas Politics. His opening statement to this book famously argued: "The perverse and unorthodox argument of this little book is that voters are not fools. Robert Jervis — Robert D. After their marriage and continuing into the s, Luella Key she did not use her first name worked at the United States Immigration and Naturalization Service. Communities with weaker ties to slavery, by contrast, look very different today. Humor sellers 21, items. Civil War History P. Key was born in Austin , Texas. Beard — William B. While legislation such as the Civil Rights Act and the Voting Rights Act made huge strides in increasing economic opportunity and reducing educational disparities, southern slavery has had a profound, lasting, and self-reinforcing influence on regional and national politics that can still be felt today. Today, southern whites who live in areas once reliant on slavery—compared to areas that were not—are more racially hostile and less amenable to policies that could promote black progress. The book decisively shaped the teaching of political science by introducing realism in analysis of politics, introducing the "interest group" model, and introducing behavioral methods based on statistical analysis of election returns. Architecture sellers 64, items. Southern History Elder's Bookstore 13 items. Psychology sellers 36, items. Writing Southern Politics Contemporary Interpretations and Future Directions 1st edition Writer Many of our ebooks are available for purchase from these online vendors:. Peter H. Kennedy appointed him to the President's Commission on Campaign Costs, which reported in From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Southern History Elder's Bookstore 13 items. Architecture sellers 64, items. Brookline, Massachusetts. Valdimer Orlando Key Jr. Show more. But the authors bring evidence to bear so well that they have knocked the ball back into the skeptics' court. In his posthumous work, The Responsible Electorate: Rationality in Presidential Voting —60 , he analyzed public opinion data and electoral returns to show what he believed to be the rationality of voters' choices as political decisions rather than responses to psychological stimuli. Luella Key died in June Today, southern whites who live in areas once reliant on slavery—compared to areas that were not—are more racially hostile and less amenable to policies that could promote black progress. She then worked at the University of Chicago in the Political Science Department, where she met her future husband, then a graduate student. Deep Roots will be enormously productive in advancing knowledge—it is what we want books to be. He pioneered the study of critical elections and served as president of the American Political Science Association in — Key , was an American political scientist known for his empirical study of American elections and voting behavior. White — John Gaus — Walter F. Robert Jervis — Robert D. View all. Download as PDF Printable version. Moreland Princeton UP. Hyneman — Carl Joachim Friedrich — C. Kennedy School of Government at Harvard University. Luella Gettys. Munro — Jesse S. Deep Roots represents a defining moment in the field of American politics. The discussion of past research and writing is an invaluable tool for understanding the trends in southern politics over the past half century. Namespaces Article Talk. Those areas today remain the most racially conservative among southern whites, with continuing political effects. His opening statement to this book famously argued: "The perverse and unorthodox argument of this little book is that voters are not fools. October 5, Photography sellers 82, items. The book is engaging and thorough in its analysis and puts forth theory that will be useful for readers specifically interested in the intersections of political geography, racial attitudes, and political behavior. Religion sellers , items. Education sellers 62, items. Lowi — James Q. Wilson — Lucius Barker — Charles O. Swisher — Emmette Redford — Charles S. Merriam 's direction. Ogg — William Anderson — Robert E. Key Jr. Steed; Laurence W. Retrieved — via fee, Fairfax County Public Library. Deep Roots shows that these forces created a local political culture steeped in racial prejudice, and that these viewpoints have been passed down over generations, from parents to children and via communities, through a process called behavioral path dependence. Writing Southern Politics Contemporary Interpretations and Future Directions 1st edition Reviews Key also refuted the hypothesis that "Southern backwardness" could be attributed to poor whites. Dictionary of American Biography. He pioneered the study of critical elections and served as president of the American Political Science Association in — Education sellers 62, items. Odegard — Luther Gulick — E. Southern History Books Again 79 items. Charles A. By examining these trends and developing an agenda for future research, the authors provide a roadmap for identifying the changes that will likely shape the region over the next half century. Americana sellers 61, items. In addition to reviewing existing literature, Writing Southern Politics also includes suggestions for a future research agenda. Fairlie — Benjamin F. Cushman — Leonard D. He transferred to the University of Texas at Austin B. Southerners are more likely to support Republican candidates, gun rights, and the death penalty, and southern whites harbor higher levels of racial resentment than whites in other parts of the country. Lane — Heinz Eulau — Robert E. The book is engaging and thorough in its analysis and puts forth theory that will be useful for readers specifically interested in the intersections of political geography, racial attitudes, and political behavior. Literature sellers , items. Deep Roots will resonate with what you know and reshape how you think. Scholars, journalists, writers, and pundits have long regarded the South as the nation's most politically distinctive region. But the authors bring evidence to bear so well that they have knocked the ball back into the skeptics' court. Kennedy appointed him to the President's Commission on Campaign Costs, which reported in Philosophy sellers 62, items. Swisher — Emmette Redford — Charles S. Writing Southern Politics Contemporary Interpretations and Future Directions 1st edition Read Online Race and Class in Texas Politics. Deep Roots represents a defining moment in the field of American politics. Lowi — James Q. Ward — Avery Leiserson — J. Americana sellers 61, items. Politics sellers 41, items. Gardening sellers 19, items. Sears, University of California, Los Angeles. Individually, the essays in this volume identify and clarify the key writing and research in selected subfields of southern politics, including religion, race, women, and political parties. Schmidt, Bookseller 10 items. Rather, he asserted that a rich oligarchy of " Southern Bourbons " manipulated working class whites, and unified Southern voters to preserve the economic and social order of the time. Schmidt, Bookseller 49 items. Overview Author s Reviews Taylor Cole — Carl B. Katzenstein — Henry E. This convincing and carefully researched book shows that contemporary political orientations in the white South are rooted in the political geography of slavery, its political economy, and its evolving system of racial domination. Avidit Acharya is assistant professor of political science at Stanford University. Southern History Elder's Bookstore 13 items. House U. American History Dan Pope Books 22 items. In his posthumous work, The Responsible Electorate: Rationality in Presidential Voting —60 , he analyzed public opinion data and electoral returns to show what he believed to be the rationality of voters' choices as political decisions rather than responses to psychological stimuli. Key also refuted the hypothesis that "Southern backwardness" could be attributed to poor whites. Education sellers 62, items. While legislation such as the Civil Rights Act and the Voting Rights Act made huge strides in increasing economic opportunity and reducing educational disparities, southern slavery has had a profound, lasting, and self-reinforcing influence on regional and national politics that can still be felt today. Law sellers 21, items. Religion sellers , items. The discussion of past research and writing is an invaluable tool for understanding the trends in southern politics over the past half century. https://files8.webydo.com/9584340/UploadedFiles/D2EE4850-BAF6-E153-F061-120EB0123DE6.pdf https://files8.webydo.com/9583019/UploadedFiles/AC20B62E-0188-F62B-D065-2DA717E519D0.pdf https://cdn.starwebserver.se/shops/malinivarssonhk/files/dove-800.pdf https://files8.webydo.com/9583363/UploadedFiles/853E05A7-5CD7-2C67-4721-DF58062DD585.pdf https://files8.webydo.com/9583719/UploadedFiles/1B7D8732-814F-654A-5B0D-CFC464372E43.pdf.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Theory of War and Peace: Theories and Cases COURSE TITLE 2
    Ilia State University Faculty of Arts and Sciences MA Level Course Syllabus 1. Theory of War and Peace: Theories and Cases COURSE TITLE 2. Spring Term COURSE DURATION 3. 6.0 ECTS 4. DISTRIBUTION OF HOURS Contact Hours • Lectures – 14 hours • Seminars – 12 hours • Midterm Exam – 2 hours • Final Exam – 2 hours • Research Project Presentation – 2 hours Independent Work - 118 hours Total – 150 hours 5. Nino Pavlenishvili INSTRUCTOR Associate Professor, PhD Ilia State University Mobile: 555 17 19 03 E-mail: [email protected] 6. None PREREQUISITES 7. Interactive lectures, topic-specific seminars with INSTRUCTION METHODS deliberations, debates, and group discussions; and individual presentation of the analytical memos, and project presentation (research paper and PowerPoint slideshow) 8. Within the course the students are to be introduced to COURSE OBJECTIVES the vast bulge of the literature on the causes of war and condition of peace. We pay primary attention to the theory and empirical research in the political science and international relations. We study the leading 1 theories, key concepts, causal variables and the processes instigating war or leading to peace; investigate the circumstances under which the outcomes differ or are very much alike. The major focus of the course is o the theories of interstate war, though it is designed to undertake an overview of the literature on civil war, insurgency, terrorism, and various types of communal violence and conflict cycles. We also give considerable attention to the methodology (qualitative/quantitative; small-N/large-N, Case Study, etc.) utilized in the well- known works of the leading scholars of the field and methodological questions pertaining to epistemology and research design.
    [Show full text]
  • Phd in Political Science Comprehensive Examination Guidebook
    Department of Political Science __________________________________________________________ PhD in Political Science Comprehensive Examination Guidebook Contents Pages 2-3: Examination Overview and General Directions Pages 4-10: Reading Lists Page 4- Methodology Page 5- American Government Page 6- Comparative Politics Page 7- International Relations Page 9- Public Policy Page 11-13: Sample Questions for Written Examination Page 11- Methodology Page 12- American Government Page 12- Comparative Politics Page 12- International Relations Page 13- Public Policy EXAMINATION OVERVIEW AND GENERAL DIRECTIONS Doctoral students sit For the comprehensive examination at the conclusion of all required coursework, or during their last semester of coursework. Students will ideally take their exams during the fifth semester in the program, but no later than their sixth semester. Advanced Entry students are strongly encouraged to take their exams during their Fourth semester, but no later than their FiFth semester. The comprehensive examination is a written exam based on the literature and research in the relevant Field of study and on the student’s completed coursework in that field. Petitioning to Sit for the Examination Your First step is to petition to participate in the examination. Use the Department’s graduate petition form and include the following information: 1) general statement of intent to sit For a comprehensive examination, 2) proposed primary and secondary Fields areas (see below), and 3) a list or table listing all graduate courses completed along with the Faculty instructor For the course and the grade earned This petition should be completed early in the registration period For when the student plans to sit For the exam.
    [Show full text]
  • Must War Find a Way?167
    Richard K. Betts A Review Essay Stephen Van Evera, Causes of War: Power and the Roots of Conict Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1999 War is like love, it always nds a way. —Bertolt Brecht, Mother Courage tephen Van Evera’s book revises half of a fteen-year-old dissertation that must be among the most cited in history. This volume is a major entry in academic security studies, and for some time it will stand beside only a few other modern works on causes of war that aspiring international relations theorists are expected to digest. Given that political science syllabi seldom assign works more than a generation old, it is even possible that for a while this book may edge ahead of the more general modern classics on the subject such as E.H. Carr’s masterful polemic, 1 The Twenty Years’ Crisis, and Kenneth Waltz’s Man, the State, and War. Richard K. Betts is Leo A. Shifrin Professor of War and Peace Studies at Columbia University, Director of National Security Studies at the Council on Foreign Relations, and editor of Conict after the Cold War: Arguments on Causes of War and Peace (New York: Longman, 1994). For comments on a previous draft the author thanks Stephen Biddle, Robert Jervis, and Jack Snyder. 1. E.H. Carr, The Twenty Years’ Crisis, 2d ed. (New York: Macmillan, 1946); and Kenneth N. Waltz, Man, the State, and War (New York: Columbia University Press, 1959). See also Waltz’s more general work, Theory of International Politics (Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley, 1979); and Hans J.
    [Show full text]
  • Reviewer Fatigue? Why Scholars PS Decline to Review Their Peers’ Work
    AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE ASSOCIATION Reviewer Fatigue? Why Scholars PS Decline to Review Their Peers’ Work | Marijke Breuning, Jeremy Backstrom, Jeremy Brannon, Benjamin Isaak Gross, Announcing Science & Politics Political Michael Widmeier Why, and How, to Bridge the “Gap” Before Tenure: Peer-Reviewed Research May Not Be the Only Strategic Move as a Graduate Student or Young Scholar Mariano E. Bertucci Partisan Politics and Congressional Election Prospects: Political Science & Politics Evidence from the Iowa Electronic Markets Depression PSOCTOBER 2015, VOLUME 48, NUMBER 4 Joyce E. Berg, Christopher E. Peneny, and Thomas A. Rietz dep1 dep2 dep3 dep4 dep5 dep6 H1 H2 H3 H4 H5 H6 Bayesian Analysis Trace Histogram −.002 500 −.004 400 −.006 300 −.008 200 100 −.01 0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 0 Iteration number −.01 −.008 −.006 −.004 −.002 Autocorrelation Density 0.80 500 all 0.60 1−half 400 2−half 0.40 300 0.20 200 0.00 100 0 10 20 30 40 0 Lag −.01 −.008 −.006 −.004 −.002 Here are some of the new features: » Bayesian analysis » IRT (item response theory) » Multilevel models for survey data » Panel-data survival models » Markov-switching models » SEM: survey data, Satorra–Bentler, survival models » Regression models for fractional data » Censored Poisson regression » Endogenous treatment effects » Unicode stata.com/psp-14 Stata is a registered trademark of StataCorp LP, 4905 Lakeway Drive, College Station, TX 77845, USA. OCTOBER 2015 Cambridge Journals Online For further information about this journal please go to the journal website at: journals.cambridge.org/psc APSA Task Force Reports AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE ASSOCIATION Let’s Be Heard! How to Better Communicate Political Science’s Public Value The APSA task force reports seek John H.
    [Show full text]
  • Was the Cold War a Security Dilemma?
    Was the Cold War a Security Dilemma? Robert Jervis xploring whether the Cold War was a security dilemma illumi- nates botEh history and theoretical concepts. The core argument of the security dilemma is that, in the absence of a supranational authority that can enforce binding agreements, many of the steps pursued by states to bolster their secu- rity have the effect—often unintended and unforeseen—of making other states less secure. The anarchic nature of the international system imposes constraints on states’ behavior. Even if they can be certain that the current in- tentions of other states are benign, they can neither neglect the possibility that the others will become aggressive in the future nor credibly guarantee that they themselves will remain peaceful. But as each state seeks to be able to pro- tect itself, it is likely to gain the ability to menace others. When confronted by this seeming threat, other states will react by acquiring arms and alliances of their own and will come to see the rst state as hostile. In this way, the inter- action between states generates strife rather than merely revealing or accentuat- ing con icts stemming from differences over goals. Although other motives such as greed, glory, and honor come into play, much of international politics is ultimately driven by fear. When the security dilemma is at work, interna- tional politics can be seen as tragic in the sense that states may desire—or at least be willing to settle for—mutual security, but their own behavior puts this very goal further from their reach.1 1.
    [Show full text]
  • The Organizational Process and Bureaucratic Politics Paradigms: Retrospect and Prospect Author(S): David A
    The Organizational Process and Bureaucratic Politics Paradigms: Retrospect and Prospect Author(s): David A. Welch Source: International Security , Fall, 1992, Vol. 17, No. 2 (Fall, 1992), pp. 112-146 Published by: The MIT Press Stable URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/2539170 REFERENCES Linked references are available on JSTOR for this article: https://www.jstor.org/stable/2539170?seq=1&cid=pdf- reference#references_tab_contents You may need to log in to JSTOR to access the linked references. JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at https://about.jstor.org/terms The MIT Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to International Security This content downloaded from 209.6.197.28 on Wed, 07 Oct 2020 15:39:26 UTC All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms The Organizational David A. Welch Process and Bureaucratic Politics Paradigms Retrospect and Prospect 1991 marked the twentieth anniversary of the publication of Graham Allison's Essence of De- cision: Explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis. ' The influence of this work has been felt far beyond the study of international politics. Since 1971, it has been cited in over 1,100 articles in journals listed in the Social Sciences Citation Index, in every periodical touching political science, and in others as diverse as The American Journal of Agricultural Economics and The Journal of Nursing Adminis- tration.
    [Show full text]
  • Theory of International Politics
    Theory of International Politics KENNETH N. WALTZ University of Califo rnia, Berkeley .A yy Addison-Wesley Publishing Company Reading, Massachusetts Menlo Park, California London • Amsterdam Don Mills, Ontario • Sydney Preface This book is in the Addison-Wesley Series in Political Science Theory is fundamental to science, and theories are rooted in ideas. The National Science Foundation was willing to bet on an idea before it could be well explained. The following pages, I hope, justify the Foundation's judgment. Other institu­ tions helped me along the endless road to theory. In recent years the Institute of International Studies and the Committee on Research at the University of Califor­ nia, Berkeley, helped finance my work, as the Center for International Affairs at Harvard did earlier. Fellowships from the Guggenheim Foundation and from the Institute for the Study of World Politics enabled me to complete a draft of the manuscript and also to relate problems of international-political theory to wider issues in the philosophy of science. For the latter purpose, the philosophy depart­ ment of the London School of Economics provided an exciting and friendly envi­ ronment. Robert Jervis and John Ruggie read my next-to-last draft with care and in­ sight that would amaze anyone unacquainted with their critical talents. Robert Art and Glenn Snyder also made telling comments. John Cavanagh collected quantities of preliminary data; Stephen Peterson constructed the TabJes found in the Appendix; Harry Hanson compiled the bibliography, and Nacline Zelinski expertly coped with an unrelenting flow of tapes. Through many discussions, mainly with my wife and with graduate students at Brandeis and Berkeley, a number of the points I make were developed.
    [Show full text]
  • When Are Arms Races Dangerous? When Are Arms Races Charles L
    When Are Arms Races Dangerous? When Are Arms Races Charles L. Glaser Dangerous? Rational versus Suboptimal Arming Are arms races dan- gerous? This basic international relations question has received extensive at- tention.1 A large quantitative empirical literature addresses the consequences of arms races by focusing on whether they correlate with war, but remains divided on the answer.2 The theoretical literature falls into opposing camps: (1) arms races are driven by the security dilemma, are explained by the rational spiral model, and decrease security, or (2) arms races are driven by revisionist adversaries, explained by the deterrence model, and increase security.3 These Charles L. Glaser is a Professor in the Irving B. Harris Graduate School of Public Policy Studies at the Uni- versity of Chicago. For their helpful comments on earlier drafts of this article, the author would like to thank James Fearon, Michael Freeman, Lloyd Gruber, Chaim Kaufmann, John Schuessler, Stephen Walt, the anonymous reviewers for International Security, and participants in seminars at the Program on In- ternational Security Policy at the University of Chicago, the Program on International Political Economy and Security at the University of Chicago, the John M. Olin Institute at Harvard Univer- sity, and the Institute of War and Peace Studies at Columbia. He also thanks John Schuessler for valuable research assistance. 1. The pioneering study is Samuel P. Huntington, “Arms Races: Prerequisites and Results,” Public Policy, Vol. 8 (1958), pp. 41–86. Historical treatments include Paul Kennedy, “Arms-Races and the Causes of War, 1850–1945,” in Kennedy, Strategy and Diplomacy, 1870–1945 (London: George Allen and Unwin, 1983); and Grant T.
    [Show full text]
  • Theories of War and Peace
    1 THEORIES OF WAR AND PEACE POLI SCI 631 Rutgers University Fall 2018 Jack S. Levy [email protected] http://fas-polisci.rutgers.edu/levy/ Office Hours: Hickman Hall #304, Tuesday after class and by appointment "War is a matter of vital importance to the State; the province of life or death; the road to survival or ruin. It is mandatory that it be thoroughly studied." Sun Tzu, The Art of War In this seminar we undertake a comprehensive review of the theoretical and empirical literature on interstate war, focusing primarily on the causes of war and the conditions of peace but giving some attention to the conduct and termination of war. We emphasize research in political science but include some coverage of work in other disciplines. We examine the leading theories, their key causal variables, the paths or mechanisms through which those variables lead to war or to peace, and the degree of empirical support for various theories. Our survey includes research utilizing a variety of methodological approaches: qualitative, quantitative, experimental, formal, and experimental. Our primary focus, however, is on the logical coherence and analytic limitations of the theories and the kinds of research designs that might be useful in testing them. The seminar is designed primarily for graduate students who want to understand – and ultimately contribute to – the theoretical and empirical literature in political science on war, peace, and security. Students with different interests and students from other departments can also benefit from the seminar and are also welcome. Ideally, members of the seminar will have some familiarity with basic issues in international relations theory, philosophy of science, research design, and statistical methods.
    [Show full text]
  • Attack and Conquer? Karen Ruth Adams International Anarchy and the Offense-Defense-Deterrence Balance
    Attack and Conquer? Attack and Conquer? Karen Ruth Adams International Anarchy and the Offense-Defense-Deterrence Balance Scholars and strate- gists have long argued that offense is easier than defense in some periods but harder than defense in others.1 In the late 1970s, George Quester and Robert Jervis took the ªrst steps toward systematizing this claim.2 Since then, the de- bate about the causes and consequences of the offense-defense balance has been one of the most active in security studies.3 If the relative efªcacy of offense and defense changes over time, states should be more vulnerable to conquest and more likely to attack one another at some times than at others. Speciªcally, when offense is easier than defense, defenders’ military forces should be more likely to collapse or surrender when attacked, and defenders’ political leaders should be more likely to surrender sovereignty in response to military threats. Thus states in offense-dominant eras should be conquered—involuntarily lose the monopoly of force over all of their territory to external rivals—more often than states in defense-dominant eras.4 Given their heightened vulnerability to conquest, states in offense- Karen Ruth Adams is Assistant Professor of Political Science at Louisiana State University. For detailed comments, I thank Richard Betts, Stephen Biddle, Avery Goldstein, Miles Kahler, Susan Martin, Christopher Muste, Mark Peceny, Kenneth Waltz, James Wirtz, and Eugene Wittkopf. For research assistance, I thank Nicole Detraz, Katia Ivanova, and Aneta Leska. 1. For an annotated bibliography, see Michael E. Brown, Owen R. Coté Jr., Sean M. Lynn-Jones, and Steven E.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Public Administration Scholars Administration Scholars
    List of public administration scholars https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_public_ administration_scholars From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia This is an incomplete list that may never be able to satisfy particular standards for completeness. You can help by expanding it withreliably sourced entries. This list of public administration scholars includes notable theorists, academics, and researchers from public administration, public policy, and related fields such as economics, political science, management, administrative law. All of the individuals in this list have made a notable contribution to the field of public administration. O. P. Dwivedi Howard E. McCurdy Graham T. Allison Kenneth J. Meier Paul Appleby Robert K. Merton Walter Bagehot Henry Mintzberg Chester Barnard Mark H. Moore Reinhard Bendix Frederick C. Mosher James M. Buchanan R. E. Neustadt Lynton K. Caldwell W. A. Niskanen - Founded the rational choice analysing bureaucracy. Michel Crozier Johan Olsen - One of the developers of the systemic-anarchic Robert A. Dahl perspective of organizational decision making known as the Can Model. A.V. Dicey Elinor Ostrom Anthony Downs - Had a major influence on the public choiceschool of political economy. C. Northcote Parkinson - Author of Parkinson's Law satirizes government bureaucracies and explains the inevitability of bureaucratic expansion. Peter Drucker James L. Perry Patrick Dunleavy - Originated the bureau-shaping model ofbureaucracy. Gerrit van Poelje - Founder of the science of public administration in the Netherlands. Dorman Bridoman Eaton Jack Rabin David John Farmer - Author of The Language of Public Administration, listed as one of the candidate books for “great books of public administration, 1990-2010” (Meier & O’Toole, 2012, Hal G.
    [Show full text]
  • Politics, Policy, and Organizations Politics, Policy, and Organizations
    Politics, Policy, and Organizations Politics, Policy, and Organizations Frontiers in the Scientific Study of Bureaucracy Edited by George A. Krause & Kenneth J. Meier Contents Preface vii The Scientific Study of Bureaucracy: An Overview Kenneth J. Meier and George A. Krause 1 Part 1. Theory Why Do Bureaucrats Delay? Lessons from a Stochastic Optimal Stopping Model of Agency Timing, with Applications to the FDA Daniel P. Carpenter 23 Agency Risk Propensities Involving the Demand for Bureaucratic Discretion George A. Krause 41 Veto Points, Policy Preferences, and Bureaucratic Autonomy in Democratic Systems Thomas H. Hammond 73 The Benefits of Agency Policy-making: Perspectives from Positive Theory David B. Spence 104 Part 2. Methodological Technology Donut Shops, Speed Traps, and Paperwork: Supervision and the Allocation of Time to Bureaucratic Tasks John Brehm, Scott Gates, and Brad Gomez 133 vi Contents Adapting Agencies: Competition, Imitation, and Punishment in the Design of Bureaucratic Performance Andrew B. Whitford 160 Part 3. Empirical Studies Consensual Rule Making and the Time It Takes to Develop Rules Steven J. Balla and John R. Wright 187 Why It Matters Whether State Bureaucrats as Opposed to Federal Bureaucrats Administer Federal Programs Lael R. Keiser 207 Structural Choice and Political Control of Bureaucracy: Updating Federal Credit Programs Kevin Corder 233 Administrative Structure and Social Democratic Results: The Case of Education Kevin B. Smith 259 Bureaucratic Discretion and Regulatory Success without Enforcement Michael J. Licari 276 Conclusion: An Agenda for the Scientific Study of Bureaucracy Kenneth J. Meier and George A. Krause 292 References 309 Contributors 341 Author Index 343 Subject Index 349 Preface The genesis for this volume came from the organized workshop The Sci- entific Study of Bureaucracy held at the Fifth Public Management Con- ference, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, December 3–4, 1999.
    [Show full text]