Restructuring the Indian Council of Social Science Research
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
RESTRUCTURING THE INDIAN COUNCIL OF SOCIAL SCIENCE RESEARCH Report of The Fourth Review Committee March 2007 The Indian Council of Social Science Research New Delhi 4th Review Committee Contents Pages Letter of Transmittal iii Acknowledgements iv Introduction 1-4 I Social Science Research in India: Evolution and Current Status 5-23 II ICSSR: Role and Functioning 24-37 III Future Directions 38-59 IV Conclusions 60-61 V Summary of Recommendations 62-73 Annexure: i. ICSSR Institutes 74-103 ii. Research Projects 104-128 iii. Research Fellowships and Training 129-148 iv. International Collaborations 149-159 v. Organisation Structure and Human Resource Management 160-188 Appendix: i. List of Social Science Research Institutions 189-199 ii. List of Scholars Who Attended Consultations 200-201 iii. List of Institute Directors Who Attended Consultations 202 Bibliography 203-204 ii The Fourth Review Committee The Indian Council of Social Science Research, New Delhi March 18 2007 ProfessorAndre Beteille Chairman,ICSSR Dear ProfessorBeteille, We, members of the Fourth Review committee constituted by the Council, have completed our work and are happy to submit our Report on Restructuring of the Indian Council of Social Science Research. The Report is based on extensive discussions with you, Professor T.C.A. Anant and other colleagues at the ICSSR secretariat, consultations with a wide cross section of social scientists and our own deliberations on the functioning of the ICSSR within the context of the current state of social science research. There is a general feeling that the Council has not made as large an impact in promoting serious social science research as was expected. But it is recognized that this is due to factors beyond its control and reflects the malaise affiicting social science research as a whole. The nature of this malaise and the importance and urgency of redressing it are underscored in the Report. We are convinced that radically redesigning the council in the form of the Indian Academy of Social Sciences is required to enable it to play an active role in promoting high quality social science research in India. Our major suggestions contain the following key elements: .a substantial increase in funding by earmarking 0.1% of the public sector plan expenditure every year as grants to the Academy to support research on contemporary social and developmental issues in the country; .a major reorientation in programme priorities and funding strategies to ensure better balancing between different activities; .devising stricter mechanisms and procedures to ensure accountability for superior professional quality of projects and their outputs; .To ensure that the restructured organisation is autonomous, transparent and professionally managed the Council be converted into 'The Indian Academy of Social Sciences' as a statutory body. We hope that our reportwill playa part to revitalize social scienceresearch in India. _':::~/Y'-P("<f~ ~ .~~~ A. Vaidyanathan Mihir Rakshit .(Chairman) \l~ * ~_. N~(() ~ ~.t~ N,Jayaram KUriak~~~~~:::: (Member-Secretary) 4th Review Committee ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The Chairman and the members of the Fourth Review Committee express their appreciation to the Indian Council of Social Science Research for entrusting them with the responsibility to review its structure and functioning and suggest measures to make it more effective in promoting quality social science research in India. The committee has been able to complete its task as it was fortunate to receive support and help from various sources as and when it sought any form of assistance. The committee is in particular grateful to Professor Andre Beteille, Chairman of ICSSR, who spared valuable time on different occasions during the tenure of the committee and shared very useful information and insights into various facets of the Council and its functioning The committee is thankful to Professor T.C.A. Anant, the Member-Secretary of ICSSR, who shared his views on the various dimensions of the Council and its functioning and also facilitated the work of the committee by providing all the necessary data and took care of necessary arrangements for conducting consultative meetings with the different stake holders at different locations in India. The committee expresses thanks to Dr. Prahlad Singh, who, on behalf of ICSSR, coordinated with the committee. The committee benefited from detailed discussions it held with heads of the various divisions of ICSSR, especially R. R. Prasad – Director Research Projects, Dr. Arun Bali – Director, Research Institutes & Regional Centres, Dr. Ranjit Sinha – Director, R.S.P (Research Survey & Publications), Dr. P.R. Goswami – Director, NASSDOC, Dr. G. S. Saun – Dy Director, Fellowships, Shri. N.K. Gupta – F.A. & CAO, and Dr. Srikant Khandewale – Social Science Liaison Officer, International Collaboration, who shared valuable information with us. The committee owes gratitude to a large number of individuals including representatives of the Council’s staff and professional members at its secretariat, social scientists who participated in the consultative meetings held in New Delhi, Mumbai, Bangalore and Kolkata and especially those who provided us with written views and suggestions, and the Directors of the ICSSR institutes who met us in Hyderabad, with whom we had detailed discussions on the various aspects of the Council and its functioning. The committee expresses its thanks to Dr. Ashok Lahiri, Dr. Ram Reddy, Dr. Harsh Sethi and Mr. Mrityunjaya for providing with important information. The committee is grateful to the Institute for Social and Economic Change, Bangalore, the Indira Gandhi Institute of Development and Research, Mumbai, and the Indian Institute of Management Calcutta, for providing with necessary facilities to hold the regional consultative meetings with the social scientists from the different regions. The committee expresses its deep appreciation to the management and staff of Chintan, the ICSSR Guest House for hosting several meetings in New Delhi. A. Vaidyanathan Chairman, The Fourth Review Committee iv Restructuring the Indian Council of Social Science Research Report of the Committee to Review The Indian Council of Social Science Research 4th Review Committee Introduction Pursuant to a decision taken at the 102nd meeting of the Indian Council of Social Science Research held on February 10, 2006, a Committee to review its functioning was constituted in May 2006. The Committee comprised the following members: A. Vaidyanathan - Chairman Mihir Rakshit Niraja Gopal Jayal N. Jayaram Kuriakose Mamkoottam - Member Secretary The Committee’s Terms of Reference are 1. Review the performance of the council in promoting social science research in terms of the mandate described in its Memorandum of Association. In this connection to evaluate its policies and programmes for research institutes; regional centres; research projects; fellowships; support of publications and documentation services; and promoting international collaborations 2. Examine and suggest changes in the structure, organization and functioning of the Council that would enable it to be an effective agent for improving the quality of social science research in the changed and changing context. 3. Suggest measures to enable the council to play a more effective and meaningful role in promoting social science research in and through public institutions for better understanding of the processes of development and social change and for public policy. 4. Any other matter related to the conduct and care of social science research. The Review Committee started its work formally on the 1st of June 2006. The Committee members met among themselves several times and also held meetings and discussions with other stakeholders of the Council. The dates and locations of meetings held are given below: 1 4th Review Committee Dates Venue Discussions with 1/6 &2 /6 New Delhi Chairman, Member-Secretary and senior officials of the 2006 Council 8/7 & 9/7 New Delhi Staff of various divisions of the Council and internal 2006 meetings 12/8 &13/8 New Delhi Staff of various divisions of the council and internal 2006 meetings 15/9 2006 New Delhi Professional Staff of the ICSSR 15/9 2006 New Delhi Employees of the ICSSR 30/9 &1/10 New Delhi Selected group of social scientists from the northern 2006 region and internal meetings 28/10 & Bangalore Selected group of social scientists from the southern 29/10, 2006 region and internal meetings 23/11& Mumbai Selected group of social scientists from the western 24/11, 2006 region and internal meetings 4/12, 2006 Hyderabad Directors of ICSSR institutes 12/12 & Kolkata Selected group of social scientists from the eastern 13/12, 2006 region and internal meetings 31/1 &1/2, New Delhi Discussion of draft report 2007 6/3 & 7/3 New Delhi Finalisation of report 2007 Ours is the fourth in a series of committees appointed to review the work of the Council. The first review was done in 19731; the second in 19782 and the third in 19863. These reports provide a comprehensive account of the evolution and functioning of the council and a critical assessment of achievements and shortcomings of its various activities and suggestions for improvement. We have benefited greatly from a study of these reports. We have also noted a widespread concern over recent trends in social science research generally, and about the effectiveness of the Council in particular, articulated in a number 1 ICSSR, Social Science in India: A Report: Retrospective and Prospective,