DOCSLIB.ORG

2013 Suriname National Household Drug Prevalence Survey Report Provides an Overview of the Use of Substances Among the Population in Suriname

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2013 Suriname National Household Drug Prevalence Survey Report Provides an Overview of the Use of Substances Among the Population in Suriname 2013 SURINAME NATIONAL HOUSEHOLD DRUG PREVALENCE SURVEY Prepared By: Eva Stroo, MSc 2015 In collaboration with: Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission (CICAD) Organization of American States (OAS) Suriname National Household Drug Survey 2013 Acknowledgements This report is made possible by the Organization of American States (OAS), through the Executive Secretariat of the Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission (CICAD). Special thanks to Pernell Clarke and Tiffany Barry of CICAD for project management, training, monitoring and technical assistance during the implementation of this study. The Embassy of the USA in Suriname and the Bureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs (INL) of the US State Department provided financial support for this project. Sincere gratitude to Gerold Dompig, CICAD’s Principal Representative to CICAD for his leadership in overseeing the completion of this project. Also many thanks to Tiffany Doerachman for practical support during the completion of the report. Special thanks are extended to the Director and staff of the Suriname Statistical Bureau who not only selected the sample of households, but also trained the field personnel in relation to the mapping of districts and the identification of selected households. Also special acknowledgement to the field staff and data entry personnel, in particular Ms. Charity Linga, for their dedication and commitment to their tasks. Finally, thanks to the National Security Office in Suriname and the persons who coordinated this project at different stages for their contribution to this study. 1 Suriname National Household Drug Survey 2013 Table of Contents Prologue .................................................................................................................................................. 5 Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................. 6 1. Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 7 1.1 Drug trade, drug related crime and drug use ................................................................................ 7 1.2 Treatment ...................................................................................................................................... 8 1.3 National Anti-Drug Council ............................................................................................................ 8 1.4 Household survey on drug use ...................................................................................................... 9 2. Methodology ................................................................................................................................. 10 2.1 Sampling design ........................................................................................................................... 10 2.2 Challenges ................................................................................................................................... 11 3. Results ........................................................................................................................................... 12 3.1 Demographic Characteristics ....................................................................................................... 12 3.2 Substance use once in a lifetime, annual and last 30 days, overall and by gender .................... 16 3.3 Problems associated with alcohol use ........................................................................................ 19 3.4 Problems associated with marijuana use .................................................................................... 22 3.5 Substance use by strata ............................................................................................................... 25 3.6 Substance use by work status ..................................................................................................... 29 3.7 Substance use by age group ........................................................................................................ 32 4. Conclusions .................................................................................................................................... 34 4.1 Limitations ................................................................................................................................... 35 5. Recommendations......................................................................................................................... 36 References ............................................................................................................................................. 37 Appendices ............................................................................................................................................ 38 Appendix A, Questionnaire National Household Survey Suriname .................................................. 38 2 Suriname National Household Drug Survey 2013 List of Tables Table 1. Gender .................................................................................................................................. 12 Table 2. Strata ................................................................................................................................... 12 Table 3. Age groups ........................................................................................................................... 12 Table 4. Work Status .......................................................................................................................... 13 Table 5. Head of the household ........................................................................................................ 13 Table 6. Education ............................................................................................................................. 14 Table 7. Monthly income ................................................................................................................... 14 Table 8. Marital Status ...................................................................................................................... 15 Table 9. Religion ............................................................................................................................... 16 Table 10. Lifetime, past year and past month substance use, overall and by gender ..................... 19 Table 11. Problems associated with alcohol use, overall, by gender and by age group ................... 20 Table 12. Various problems because of alcohol, overall, by gender and by age group .................... 21 Table 13. Problems associated with marijuana use, overall, by gender and by age group ............... 24 Table 14. Lifetime, past year, and past month prevalence of substance use by strata .................... 29 Table 15. Lifetime, past year, and past month prevalence of substance use by work status ........... 31 Table 16. Lifetime, past year, and past month prevalence of substance use by age group .............. 33 3 Suriname National Household Drug Survey 2013 List of Figures Figure 1. The districts of Suriname ........................................................................................................ 10 Figure 2. Gender .................................................................................................................................... 12 Figure 3. Strata ................................................................................................................................... 12 Figure 4. Age groups ........................................................................................................................... 12 Figure 5. Work status ............................................................................................................................ 13 Figure 6. Head of the household ........................................................................................................ 13 Figure 7. Education ................................................................................................................................ 14 Figure 8. Monthly income ..................................................................................................................... 15 Figure 9. Marital status ...................................................................................................................... 15 Figure 10. Religion ............................................................................................................................... 16 Figure 11. Lifetime, past year and past month alcohol use, overall and by gender ............................. 16 Figure 12. Lifetime, past year and past month tobacco use, overall and by gender ............................ 16 Figure 13. Lifetime, past year and past month marijuana use, overall and by gender ......................... 17 Figure 14. Lifetime, past year and past month cocaine use, overall and by gender ............................. 17 Figure 15. Lifetime, past year and past month crack use, overall and by gender................................. 17 Figure 16. Lifetime, past year and past month ecstasy use, overall and by gender ............................. 18 Figure 17. Lifetime, past year and past month tranquilizer use, overall and by gender ...................... 18 Figure 18. Lifetime, past year and
Load more

Recommended publications
  • ESIA) with An
    SURINAME Public Disclosure Authorized Saramacca Canal System Rehabilitation Project Preliminary Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) with an Public Disclosure Authorized Environmental and Social Management Plan (ESMP) Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized November 2018 Table of Contents ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS ..................................................................................... i EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..................................................................................................... iii Background ................................................................................................................................................ iii Project Description ..................................................................................................................................... iv Analysis of Alternatives ............................................................................................................................... v Legal, Regulatory, and Policy Framework .................................................................................................... v Applicable World Bank Safeguard Policies .................................................................................................. vi ESIA Process, Consultation, and Review Process ....................................................................................... vii Environmental and Social Baseline Information and Data .......................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A Rapid Biological Assessment of the Kwamalasamutu Region, Suriname August-September 2010 Preliminary Report
    A Rapid Biological Assessment of the Kwamalasamutu Region, Suriname August-September 2010 Preliminary Report A collaboration of: Conservation International – Suriname, Rapid Assessment Program (RAP), Center for Environmental Leadership in Business (CELB), Alcoa Foundation Preliminary report produced and distributed January 24, 2011 by Conservation International all photos ©Piotr Naskrecki 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgments……………………………………………………… 4 Participants and Authors…………………………………………….… 5 Map………………………………………………………………….…... 9 Introduction to the RAP Survey………………………………….….… 10 Description of RAP Survey Sites………………………………….….... 11 Summary of Preliminary Results by Taxonomic Group…………… 12 Summary of Preliminary Conservation Recommendations……….. 16 Preliminary Reports Water Quality…………………………………………………………… 20 Plants…………………….…….………………………………………… 22 Aquatic Beetles…………………………………………………………. 28 Dung Beetles……………………………………………………………. 31 Ants……………………………………………………………………… 36 Katydids ……………………………………………………................... 38 Dragonflies and Damselflies……………………………….…………… 43 Fishes……………………………………………………………………. 47 Reptiles and Amphibians…………………………………..................... 50 Birds........…………………………………………………….................. 51 Small Mammals………………………………………………………… 56 Large Mammals………………………………………………………… 59 Appendices: Preliminary Data and Species Lists Appendix 1. Water Quality Data………………………………................... 64 Appendix 2. Plants………………………………………………………….. 67 Appendix 3. Aquatic Beetles……………………………………………….. 70 Appendix 4. Dung Beetles………………………………………………….. 72
    [Show full text]
  • In and out of Suriname Caribbean Series
    In and Out of Suriname Caribbean Series Series Editors Rosemarijn Hoefte (Royal Netherlands Institute of Southeast Asian and Caribbean Studies) Gert Oostindie (Royal Netherlands Institute of Southeast Asian and Caribbean Studies) Editorial Board J. Michael Dash (New York University) Ada Ferrer (New York University) Richard Price (em. College of William & Mary) Kate Ramsey (University of Miami) VOLUME 34 The titles published in this series are listed at brill.com/cs In and Out of Suriname Language, Mobility and Identity Edited by Eithne B. Carlin, Isabelle Léglise, Bettina Migge, and Paul B. Tjon Sie Fat LEIDEN | BOSTON This is an open access title distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 Unported (CC-BY-NC 3.0) License, which permits any non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited. The realization of this publication was made possible by the support of KITLV (Royal Netherlands Institute of Southeast Asian and Caribbean Studies). Cover illustration: On the road. Photo by Isabelle Léglise. This publication has been typeset in the multilingual “Brill” typeface. With over 5,100 characters covering Latin, IPA, Greek, and Cyrillic, this typeface is especially suitable for use in the humanities. For more information, please see www.brill.com/brill-typeface issn 0921-9781 isbn 978-90-04-28011-3 (hardback) isbn 978-90-04-28012-0 (e-book) Copyright 2015 by the Editors and Authors. This work is published by Koninklijke Brill NV. Koninklijke Brill NV incorporates the imprints Brill, Brill Nijhoff and Hotei Publishing. Koninklijke Brill NV reserves the right to protect the publication against unauthorized use and to authorize dissemination by means of offprints, legitimate photocopies, microform editions, reprints, translations, and secondary information sources, such as abstracting and indexing services including databases.
    [Show full text]
  • 2017 STAATSBLAD VAN DE REPUBLIEK SURINAME No. 108
    2017 STAATSBLAD No. 108 VAN DE REPUBLIEK SURINAME WET VAN 15 NOVEMBER 2017, TOT VASTSTELL1NG VAN DE 3-DE AFDELING VAN DE BEGROTING VAN U1TGAVEN EN ONTVANGSTEN VOOR HET DIENSTJAAR 2017 BETREFFENDE HET MINISTERIE VAN REG1ONALE ONTWIKKELING. DE PRESIDENT VAN DE REPUBLIEK SURINAME, In overweging genomen hebbende, dat de Surinaamse begroting bij wet dient te worden vastgesteld; de Staatsraad gehoord, na goedkeuring door de Nationale Assemblee, bekraelitigd de onderstaande wet. Artikel 1 De 03-DE Afdeling van de begroting van uitgaven en ontvangsten voor het dienstjaar 2017 betreffende het MINISTER1E VAN REGIONALE ONTWIKKELING wordt vastgesteld als volgt: DIRECTORAAT REG1ONALE ONTWIKKELING TITEL 1: OPERATIONELE UITGAVEN Bedra en x SRD 1.000 Code Lopende uitgaven Bedrag 610 Lonen en Salarissen 145,245 611 Sociale Premies 15,219 612 Gebruik van goederen en diensten 3,025 615 Schenkingen en Bijdragen - 61 6 Sociale uitkeringen 200 Totaal lopende uitgaven 163,689 Kapitaaluitgaven 620 lnventaris - Totaal Kapitaal uitgaven - Totaal Operationcle uitgaven 163,689 2017 -2- No. 108 TITEL 11: PROGRAMMA'S Bedra en x SRD 1000 CODE Programma Bedrag Programma: 01 Infrastructurele werken 0112 Onderhoud gcbouwen cn terreincn 0 0113 Ondcrhoud wcgcn, irr. cn kunstwerken 0 0114 Bouwkundige werken / acc. Voorz. 900 Sub-totaal 900 Programma: 06 Informatie en Communicatie 0610 Radio Boskopu 35 Sub-totaal 35 Programma: 09 Subsidies en Bijdragen 0903 Stichting Fonds Ontwikkeling Binnenland 3,440 0904 Instituut Bcstuursambtcnarcn Surinamc (l BAS) 1,800 0905 • Dorpsontwikkc
    [Show full text]
  • Convention on the Rights of the Child and the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women, and Their Specific Context to the Country)
    UNITED CRC NATIONS Convention on the Distr. Rights of the Child GENERAL CRC/C/SUR/2 24 November 2005 Original: ENGLISH COMMITTEE ON THE RIGHTS OF THE CHILD CONSIDERATION OF REPORTS SUBMITTED BY STATES PARTIES UNDER ARTICLE 44 OF THE CONVENTION Second periodic reports of States parties due in 2000 SURINAME* ** [22 August 2005] * For the initial report submitted by the Government of Suriname, see CRC/C/28/Add.11, for its consideration by the Committee, see documents CRC/C/SR.635-636 and CRC/C/15/Add.130. ** In accordance with the information transmitted to States parties regarding the processing of their reports, the present document was not formally edited before being sent to the United Nations translation services. GE.05-45193 (E) 140306 CRC/C/SUR/2 page 2 CONTENTS Paragraphs Page DEMOGRAPHIC, ECONOMIC AND POLITICAL CONTEXTS .............................................................................. 1 - 8 4 A. Demography ..................................................................... 1 - 2 4 B. Economy ........................................................................... 3 - 5 4 C. Politics .............................................................................. 6 - 8 5 I. GENERAL MEASURES OF IMPLEMENTATION ............... 9 - 42 5 A. Introduction ...................................................................... 9 - 11 5 B. Legislation and policy ...................................................... 12 - 19 6 C. Social policies and programmes ....................................... 20 - 24 8 D. Mechanisms for
    [Show full text]
  • Historic Inner City of Paramaribo
    World Heritage Scanned Nomination File Name: 940rev.pdf UNESCO Region: LATIN AMERICA AND THE CARIBBEAN __________________________________________________________________________________________________ SITE NAME: Historic Inner City of Paramaribo DATE OF INSCRIPTION: 29th June 2002 STATE PARTY: SURINAME CRITERIA: C (ii)(iv) DECISION OF THE WORLD HERITAGE COMMITTEE: Excerpt from the Report of the 26th Session of the World Heritage Committee Criterion (ii): Paramaribo is an exceptional example of the gradual fusion of European architecture and construction techniques with indigenous South America materials and crafts to create a new architectural idiom. Criterion (iv): Paramaribo is a unique example of the contact between the European culture of the Netherlands and the indigenous cultures and environment of South America in the years of intensive colonization of this region in the 16th and 17th centuries BRIEF DESCRIPTIONS Paramaribo is a former Dutch colonial town from the 17th and 18th centuries planted on the northern coast of tropical South America. The original and highly characteristic street plan of the historic centre remains intact. Its buildings illustrate the gradual fusion of Dutch architectural influence with traditional local techniques and materials. 1.b State, Province or Region: District of Paramaribo 1.d Exact location: N5 49 00 W55 10 30 TEXT of the Re-submission of the Nomination of the ‘Historic Inner City of Paramaribo’ for the World Heritage List of UNESCO Presented by the Government of the Republic of Suriname UNESCO
    [Show full text]
  • Development of Surinamese Javanese: Language Contact and Change in a Multilingual Context
    Development of Surinamese Javanese: Language contact and change in a multilingual context Published by LOT phone: +31 30 253 6111 Trans 10 3512 JK Utrecht e-mail: [email protected] The Netherlands http://www.lotschool.nl Cover illustration: Paramaribo, Suriname (photo by Sophie Villerius) ISBN: 978-94-6093-313-4 NUR 616 Copyright © 2018: Sophie Villerius. All rights reserved. Development of Surinamese Javanese: Language contact and change in a multilingual context Proefschrift ter verkrijging van de graad van doctor aan de Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen op gezag van de rector magnificus prof. dr. J.H.J.M. van Krieken, volgens besluit van het college van decanen in het openbaar te verdedigen op donderdag 24 januari 2019 om 10.30 uur precies door Sophie Elise Villerius geboren op 21 september 1988 te Amstelveen Promotoren: Prof. dr. P.C. Muysken Prof. dr. M.A.F. Klamer (Universiteit Leiden) Manuscriptcommissie: Prof. dr. H. de Hoop (voorzitter) Dr. S.P. Aalberse (Universiteit van Amsterdam) Dr. J. Vander Klok (Universitetet i Oslo, Noorwegen) Prof. dr. W. van der Molen (Universitas Indonesia, Depok, Indonesië) Prof. dr. C.H.M. Versteegh The research presented in this dissertation was funded by a grant from the graduate program of the Netherlands Graduate School of Linguistics (LOT), who received the funds from the Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO) in the context of the project “Language – from cognition to communication” (NWO project number 022.004.015). Contents Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Conditioning of Aggressive Water in Suriname
    Conditioning aggressive water 01-04-2008 12:12 Pagina 1 Conditioning of aggressive water in Suriname Conditioning of aggressive water in Suriname AnushkaSalmin 4 April 2008 Anushka Salmin Department of Water Management Sanitary Engineering Section Faculty of Civil Engineering and Geosciences Conditioning of aggressive water in Suriname Master of Science Thesis Anushka Salmin Delft, April 2008 Committee: Prof. Ir. J. C. van Dijk Delft University of Technology Department of Water Management Section of Sanitary Engineering Chair of Drinking Water Dr. Ir. J. Q. J. C. Verberk Delft University of Technology Department of Water Management Section of Sanitary Engineering Chair of Drinking Water Prof. Dr. Ir. T. N. Olsthoorn Delft University of Technology Department of Water Management Section of Water Resources Chair of Hydrology Preface Preface This report is written within the framework of the Master Thesis Research at the Section of Sanitary Engineering at the Delft University of Technology. The subject of this research is the conditioning of aggressive water in Suriname. Currently aggressive water is treated in Suriname by means of shell filtration. Due to the multi purpose use of shells among which water treatment and soap production, the shells provision is threatened to run out in the long term. Therefore in time the shells will need to be replaced by an alternative conditioning material. Currently at pumping stations of the SWM, Surinaamsche Waterleiding Maatschappij, certain treatment processes are applied for the treatment of aggressive groundwater. However, based on water quality data of the raw water of several of these pumping stations it is found that the necessary treatment steps for the conditioning of the aggressive groundwater is not applied at the pumping stations.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Report Support Sound Land Use Planning in Suriname
    FINAL REPORT SUPPORT SOUND LAND USE PLANNING IN SURINAME Prepared for The Ministry of Ruimtelijke Ordening, Grond- en Bosbeheer Funded by: World Wildlife Fund (WWF) March 2015 ii Acknowledgements The authors are thankful to all District Commissioners and their representatives, Government officials, representatives of private organizations and individuals for the valuable information, time and insights they have contributed. A special thanks to the Ministry of RGB and WWF Guianas for their information and logistical support for the development of this report. This report was made possible with financial support from WWF-NL, WWF-Belgium and the Dutch Embassy in Paramaribo through WWF Guianas in Suriname. Views and opinions expressed in this report are those of the consultants and persons interviewed and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Ministry of RGB and WWF Guianas. Therefore, they should not, unless otherwise mentioned, be attributed to the ministry or WWF. Nancy del Prado, Henk Lutchman and Christine Toppin- Allahar Paramaribo, Suriname March 2015 I Table of Contents Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................................ I Table of Contents ............................................................................................................................. II List of Figures ................................................................................................................................. IV List of Tables ..................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • SURINAME: FLOODS 15 May 2006
    Appeal no. MDRSR001 SURINAME: FLOODS 15 May 2006 The Federation’s mission is to improve the lives of vulnerable people by mobilizing the power of humanity. It is the world’s largest humanitarian organization and its millions of volunteers are active in over 183 countries. In Brief THIS EMERGENCY APPEAL SEEKS CHF 854,305 (USD 706,309 OR EUR 550,346) IN CASH, KIND, OR SERVICES TO ASSIST 4,000 FAMILIES (SOME 20,000 BENEFICIARIES) FOR 5 MONTHS <click here to link directly to the attached Appeal budget; click here for a map of the affected area> CHF 100,000 HAS BEEN ALLOCATED FROM THE FEDERATION’S DISASTER RELIEF EMERGENCY FUND (DREF) FOR THIS OPERATION The International Federation undertakes activities that are aligned with its Global Agenda, which sets out four broad goals to meet the Federation's mission to "improve the lives of vulnerable people by mobilizing the power of humanity". Global Agenda Goals: • Reduce the numbers of deaths, injuries and impact from disasters. • Reduce the number of deaths, illnesses and impact from diseases and public health emergencies. • Increase local community, civil society and Red Cross Red Crescent capacity to address the most urgent situations of vulnerability. • Reduce intolerance, discrimination and social exclusion and promote respect for diversity and human dignity. For further information specifically related to this operation please contact: • In Suriname: Glenn Winjgaarde, Director General, Suriname Red Cross, Paramaribo; email [email protected], phone (597) 498-410, fax (597) 464-780 • In Surinam:
    [Show full text]
  • Multi-Perspective Analysis of Drivers of Deforestation, Forest Degradation En
    BACKGROUND STUDY FOR REDD+ IN SURINAME: MULTI-PERSPECTIVE ANALYSIS OF DRIVERS OF DEFORESTATION, FOREST DEGRADATION AND BARRIERS TO REDD+ ACTIVITIES Strengthening national capacities of Suriname for the elaboration of the national REDD+ strategy and the design of its implementation framework Background study for REDD+ in Suriname: Multi-Perspective Analysis of Drivers of Deforestation, Forest Degradation and Barriers to REDD+ Activities Acknowledgements This report was prepared by the consultancy firm UNIQUE forestry and land use for the National Institute for Environment and Development in Suriname (NIMOS) and the Foundation for Forest Management and Production Control (SBB). The study benefits from collaboration between the consultant team and the staff at SBB, NIMOS and the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). We extend our appreciation to all those who contributed their time and knowledge, especially those stakeholders who were consulted during the inception mission and leading up to the validation workshop (see annex 2) and in the national workshop on 8 December 2016. Please cite as follows: NIMOS, SBB and UNIQUE (2017). Background study for REDD+ in Suriname: Multi-perspective analysis of drivers of deforestation, forest degradation and barriers to REDD+ activities. Paramaribo, Suriname. Disclaimer The content of this report does not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of any agency of the Government of Suriname. The purpose of the report is to feed the REDD+ readiness process with background information that will be further analysed and considered when developing the national REDD+ strategy for Suriname. Views and opinions expressed in this report, as well as assumptions made within the analysis, are those of the consultants or their informants and should not be seen as definite facts.
    [Show full text]
  • Republic of Suriname 9.875% Notes Due 2023
    LUXEMBOURG LISTING PROSPECTUS OFFERING MEMORANDUM US$125,000,000 Republic of Suriname 9.875% Notes due 2023 The Republic of Suriname (the “Republic”) is offering US$125,000,000 aggregate principal amount of its 9.875% notes due 2023 (the “Notes”). Interest on the Notes will be payable semi-annually in arrears on June 30 and December 30 of each year commencing on June 30, 2020. Principal of the Notes will be repaid in eight semi-annual installments, as set forth herein, commencing on June 30, 2020. The Notes will have a final maturity date of December 30, 2023. The Notes will be general, direct, unconditional, unsubordinated and unsecured obligations of the Republic and will rank equally with all other existing and future unsubordinated obligations of the Republic. The Notes will be backed by the full faith and credit of the Republic. Payment of principal and interest of the Notes will be supported by an accounts agreement pursuant to which all dividends paid to the Republic by Staatsolie Maatschapij Suriname N.V., which is wholly-owned by the Republic, will be paid directly into a collection account, as further described herein. In addition, the Republic will be required within 90 days from the date the Notes are issued to obtain the agreement of certain other third parties to make certain payments owed to the Republic or to certain entities controlled by the Republic directly into the accounts under the accounts agreement, as more fully described herein. Funds deposited in the collection account will be used to make payments of principal and interest on the Notes and payments of interest on the Republic’s outstanding 9.25% Notes due 2026 (the “2026 Notes”).
    [Show full text]