DOCSLIB.ORG

Final Report Support Sound Land Use Planning in Suriname

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Final Report Support Sound Land Use Planning in Suriname FINAL REPORT SUPPORT SOUND LAND USE PLANNING IN SURINAME Prepared for The Ministry of Ruimtelijke Ordening, Grond- en Bosbeheer Funded by: World Wildlife Fund (WWF) March 2015 ii Acknowledgements The authors are thankful to all District Commissioners and their representatives, Government officials, representatives of private organizations and individuals for the valuable information, time and insights they have contributed. A special thanks to the Ministry of RGB and WWF Guianas for their information and logistical support for the development of this report. This report was made possible with financial support from WWF-NL, WWF-Belgium and the Dutch Embassy in Paramaribo through WWF Guianas in Suriname. Views and opinions expressed in this report are those of the consultants and persons interviewed and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Ministry of RGB and WWF Guianas. Therefore, they should not, unless otherwise mentioned, be attributed to the ministry or WWF. Nancy del Prado, Henk Lutchman and Christine Toppin- Allahar Paramaribo, Suriname March 2015 I Table of Contents Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................................ I Table of Contents ............................................................................................................................. II List of Figures ................................................................................................................................. IV List of Tables ................................................................................................................................... V List of Abbreviations ...................................................................................................................... VI Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................ IX 1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 BACKGROUND ............................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 OBJECTIVES ................................................................................................................................... 2 1.3 SCOPE OF WORK ........................................................................................................................... 2 1.4 METHODOLOGY ............................................................................................................................ 3 1.5 STRUCTURE OF THE REPORT .......................................................................................................... 4 2 SITUATIONAL ANALYSIS OF LUP IN SURINAME .................................................................. 5 2.1 POLICY FRAMEWORK .................................................................................................................... 5 2.2 LEGAL FRAMEWORK ..................................................................................................................... 6 2.2.1 Land use planning legislation ................................................................................................... 6 2.2.2 Land management legislation ................................................................................................... 9 2.2.3 Gaps and challenges ............................................................................................................... 10 2.2.4 Points for improvement ........................................................................................................... 11 2.2.5 Other relevant initiatives of the Government .......................................................................... 12 2.3 INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK ..................................................................................................... 13 2.3.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 13 2.3.2 Gaps and Challenges .............................................................................................................. 18 2.4 CAPABILITIES OF EXISTING LUP INSTITUTIONS ......................................................................... 19 2.5 PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PRACTICES ............................................................................................ 19 2.6 STATUS OF LUP IN SURINAME .................................................................................................... 20 2.6.1 Context analysis ...................................................................................................................... 20 2.6.2 Land Use Planning-related initiatives .................................................................................... 25 2.7 DATA SOURCES, DATA AND INFORMATION FOR SLUP ............................................................... 30 2.7.1 Data sources, data and their properties ................................................................................. 30 2.7.2 Data delivery mechanisms ...................................................................................................... 32 2.7.3 Data and Research Priorities: Information base for SLUP .................................................... 33 2.8 STAKEHOLDERS CONSULTATIONS, SWOT ANALYSIS RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS .................. 34 2.8.1 Stakeholder consultations ....................................................................................................... 34 3 SPATIAL CONTEXT FOR SOUND LAND USE PLANNING IN SURINAME ....................... 39 3.1 SPATIAL STRUCTURE OF SURINAME: INTRODUCTORY REMARKS ............................................... 39 3.2 NATURAL SPATIAL STRUCTURE: MAIN PROCESSES AND DYNAMICS .......................................... 42 3.3 SOCIAL-SPATIAL STRUCTURE: MAIN PROCESSES AND DYNAMICS .............................................. 48 3.3.1 Spatial-economic structure and land use planning ................................................................. 53 II 3.3.2 National objectives and major economic activities ................................................................ 54 3.4 THE INTERIOR: A BROAD CONTEXT ANALYSIS ............................................................................ 56 3.4.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 56 3.5 SETTLEMENT PATTERN, LAND USE DISTRIBUTION AND PROCESSES THAT LIMIT LAND USE PLANNING. .............................................................................................................................................. 57 3.6 POSSIBLE, MACRO LEVEL SOUND LAND USE PLANNING APPROACH FOR THE INTERIOR ........... 59 4 INSTITUTIONAL, ORGANIZATIONAL AND (SOUND) LAND USE PLANNING FRAMEWORK OF RGB ......................................................................................................................... 60 4.1 INSTITUTIONAL AND ORGANIZATIONAL FRAMEWORK ............................................................... 60 4.2 ORGANIZATIONAL REQUIREMENTS AND PROCEDURES TO FACILITATE SLUP IMPLEMENTATION 66 4.3 STRENGTHENING THE SLUP-SUPPORT STRUCTURE .................................................................... 69 4.3.1 Composing a District Typology .............................................................................................. 69 4.3.2 Composing a Regional Typology ............................................................................................ 71 4.4 SOUND LAND USE PLANNING PRACTICE .................................................................................... 71 4.4.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 71 4.4.2 Actual Sound Land Use Planning Practice ............................................................................. 72 4.4.3 Past Sound Land Use Planning Practice ................................................................................ 74 5 TOWARDS A SHARED VISION FOR SOUND LAND USE PLANNING IN SURINAME ... 79 5.1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................ 79 5.2 A FIRST APPROXIMATION ............................................................................................................ 81 5.2.1 Towards a shared Vision of a national level Spatial Main Structure (SPMS) ........................ 81 5.2.2 A conceptually sound systems approach ................................................................................. 82 5.3 ADOPTING A PRAGMATIC PROCEDURAL APPROACH TO SLUP PRACTICE: FROM MACRO TO MICRO LEVEL. .......................................................................................................................................... 83 5.4 PROCEDURAL ASPECTS OF LAND USE PLANNING ........................................................................ 86 5.4.1 Possibilities and limitations to a conventional macro level approach ................................... 86 5.4.2 Identify vulnerable areas and prioritize key-districts for quick Action Planning: a strategic interventionist approach to sound land use planning practice ........................................................... 87 6 LESSONS LEARNED IN COMPARABLE
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Processenverbaal Verkiezing 2015
    AANBIEDING van het proces-verbaal van het Centraal Hoofdstembureau aan De Nationale Assemblee. Het Centraal Hoofdstembureau biedt aan De Nationale Assemblee aan het proces-verbaal van zijn werkzaamheden d.d. 15 juni 2015 als bedoeld in artikel 1 van de Kiesregeling. Het Centraal Hoofdstembureau, De heer Eugene G. Merkus MBA, Lid tevens Voorzitter Mevrouw mr. Maya Manohar, Lid tevens Plaatsvervangend voorzitter De leden: De heer Raymond J. Landburg Lid De heer mr. Delano P. A.Landvreugd MBA Lid De heer Dennis E. Menso Lcs. Lid De heer Luciano S. Mentowikromo Lid Mevrouw mr. Joan M. Nibte Lid De heer Robby E. K. Raghoe Lid Mevrouw mr. Anuska A. Ramdhani Lid Mevrouw drs. Elviera L. Sandie Lid De heer mr. Ricardo A. Vreden Lid De heer Ir. Steven W. Vrieze Lid DE NATIONALE ASSEMBLEE Ingek 16:54,A4(1.,t_ 20 iS Agenda no. 1 ) Verwezen - (' Naar MODEL XI-A PROCES-VERBAAL van de zitting van het Centraal Hoofdstembureau tot het vaststellen van de uitslag van de verkiezing van leden van De Nationale Assemblee in de kieslcringen I tot en met X. (Artikel 133 van de Kiesregeling) Het Centraal Hoofdstembureau heeft in het daartoe aangewezen lokaal zitting genomen op maandag 15 juni 2015 10.00 uur des voormiddags in Ballroom van de Kamer van Koophandel en Fabrieken aan de Prof. W. J. A. Kemkampweg no. 37, Paramaribo. Het is samengesteld uit: De heer Eugene G. Merkus MBA, Lid tevens Voorzitter Mevrouw mr. Maya Manohar, Lid tevens Plaatsvervangend voorzitter De leden: De heer Raymond J. Landburg Lid De heer mr. Delano P.
    [Show full text]
  • Download PDF Van Tekst
    OSO. Tijdschrift voor Surinaamse taalkunde, letterkunde en geschiedenis. Jaargang 9 bron OSO. Tijdschrift voor Surinaamse taalkunde, letterkunde en geschiedenis. Jaargang 9. Stichting Instituut ter Bevordering van de Surinamistiek, Nijmegen 1990 Zie voor verantwoording: https://www.dbnl.org/tekst/_oso001199001_01/colofon.php Let op: werken die korter dan 140 jaar geleden verschenen zijn, kunnen auteursrechtelijk beschermd zijn. 2 [Nummer 1] Afbeelding omslag De afbeelding op de omslag stelt een maluana voor. Dit is een ronde houten schijf van bijna een meter middellijn, die door de Wayana-Indianen in Suriname wordt gebruikt om in ronde huizen de nok van binnen af te sluiten. Gezien het feit dat het Surinaamse woord OSO ‘huis’ betekent, heeft de maluana voor ons een belangrijke symbolische betekenis. Op deze maluana, waarvan het origineel in het Academiegebouw te Leiden te zien is, zijn aan weerszijden van het middelpunt figuren afgebeeld die een zogenaamde Kuluwayak voorstellen, een dier (geest) met twee koppen en kuifveren. Foto Prentenkabinet Rijksuniversiteit Leiden. OSO. Tijdschrift voor Surinaamse taalkunde, letterkunde en geschiedenis. Jaargang 9 5 Woord vooraf Dit eerste nummer van de negende jaar van OSO toont een gewijzigde opmaak, als gevolg van een verandering in de produktiewijze. We hopen dat onze lezers er een verbetering in zien. Voor commentaar en suggesties houden we ons aanbevolen. De inhoud van dit nummer is, zoals bij het eerste nummer van een jaargang inmiddels traditie is, gevarieerd. Drie artikelen gaan echter over nauw verwante onderwerpen, namelijk Surinaamse namen: Just Wekker schrijft over de aardrijkskundige namen van indiaanse oorsprong, Alex van Stipriaan over plantagenamen en creoolse familienamen en Man A Hing over Chinese familienamen.
    [Show full text]
  • Language Practices and Linguistic Ideologies in Suriname: Results from a School Survey
    CHAPTER 2 Language Practices and Linguistic Ideologies in Suriname: Results from a School Survey Isabelle Léglise and Bettina Migge 1 Introduction The population of the Guiana plateau is characterised by multilingualism and the Republic of Suriname is no exception to this. Apart from the country’s official language, Dutch, and the national lingua franca, Sranantongo, more than twenty other languages belonging to several distinct language families are spoken by less than half a million people. Some of these languages such as Saamaka and Sarnámi have quite significant speaker communities while others like Mawayana currently have less than ten speakers.1 While many of the languages currently spoken in Suriname have been part of the Surinamese linguistic landscape for a long time, others came to Suriname as part of more recent patterns of mobility. Languages with a long history in Suriname are the Amerindian languages Lokono (Arawak), Kari’na, Trio, and Wayana, the cre- ole languages Saamaka, Ndyuka, Matawai, Pamaka, Kwinti, and Sranantongo, and the Asian-Surinamese languages Sarnámi, Javanese, and Hakka Chinese. In recent years, languages spoken in other countries in the region such as Brazilian Portuguese, Guyanese English, Guyanese Creole, Spanish, French, Haitian Creole (see Laëthier this volume) and from further afield such as varieties of five Chinese dialect groups (Northern Chinese, Wu, Min, Yue, and Kejia, see Tjon Sie Fat this volume) have been added to Suriname’s linguistic landscape due to their speakers’ increasing involvement in Suriname. Suriname’s linguistic diversity is little appreciated locally. Since indepen- dence in 1975, successive governments have pursued a policy of linguistic assimilation to Dutch with the result that nowadays, “[a] large proportion of the population not only speaks Dutch, but speaks it as their first and best language” (St-Hilaire 2001: 1012).
    [Show full text]
  • Maroons and the Communications Revolution in Suriname's Interior
    CHAPTER 7 Maroons and the Communications Revolution in Suriname’s Interior Alex van Stipriaan 1 Introduction From the first until the last day of slavery, enslaved people liberated them- selves by escaping from the plantation colony and setting up new, indepen- dent communities. These escapees, who came to be called Maroons, settled in the tropical rain forest of Suriname’s interior, far away from the seat of colonial power in Paramaribo. Yet they stayed tied to the colonial economy in several ways. The general impression people have is that Maroons lived in total isola- tion in Suriname’s interior until quite recently, about one or two generations ago, but this must now be largely discounted as a myth. This is certainly true in the case of Maroon men.1 Women, on the other hand, remained comparatively isolated until quite recently as gender-based labour division and traditional notions of womanhood mostly linked women to the domestic sphere and the village context. This chapter examines the extent to which contact with the outside world formed part of the Maroons’ existence, and how contact has influenced Maroon lifestyles throughout history.2 Crucially, I explore how Maroons’ adoption of new communication technologies is impacting patterns of com- munication with the wider world and among the Maroons themselves. This contribution does not simply deal with how objects are being adopted by sub- jects, rather it focuses on what happens to people and their context when they use new technologies and also how new technologies are transformed due to their use in specific social contexts.
    [Show full text]
  • Structuur Analyse Districten 2009-2013
    STRUCTUUR ANALYSE DISTRICTEN 2009-2013 STICHTING PLANBUREAU SURINAME December 2014 Structuuranalyse Districten IV Ruimtelijke ontwikkeling van de districten INHOUDSOPGAVE Ten geleide ................................................................................................................ ii Colofon ..................................................................................................................... iii Afkortingen ............................................................................................................... iv I DEMOGRAFISCHE ANALYSE Demografische analyse ......................................................................................... D-1 II RUIMTELIJKE ONTWIKKELING VAN DE DISTRICTEN 1. Paramaribo .................................................................................................. S-1 2. Wanica ...................................................................................................... S-22 3. Nickerie ..................................................................................................... S-38 4. Coronie ...................................................................................................... S-60 5. Saramacca ................................................................................................ S-72 6. Commewijne .............................................................................................. S-90 7. Marowijne ................................................................................................ S-109
    [Show full text]
  • Survey Papers No. 4
    Survey Papers No. 4 A PEDO- GEOMORPHOLOGICAL CLASSIFICATION AND MAP OF THE HOLOCENE SEDIMENTS IN THE COASTAL PLAIN OF THE THREE GUIANAS by R. Brinkman and L. J. Pons >il Survey Institute, Wageningen 27E43 ,<• bibliotheek /Zûift J ~ ' STARINGGEBOUW SOIL SURVEY PAPERS No. 4 A PEDO-GEOMORPHOLOGICAL CLASSIFICATION AND MAP OF THE HOLOCENE SEDIMENTS IN THE COASTAL PLAIN OF THE THREE GUIANAS R. Brinkman Technical officer, Soil Survey (FAO); 1961-1964 Guyana (formerly British Guiana) and L. J. Pons Soil scientist, Soil Survey Institute of the Netherlands; 1962-1964 Department of Soil Survey, Suriname SOIL SURVEY INSTITUTE, WAGENINGEN, THE NETHERLANDS - 1968 7SA/ • o~ CONTENTS 1. Summary 5 2. Introduction 6 3. Sea level movements, marine sedimentation, soil formation and erosion ... 8 3.1. The sediments 8 3.2. The sea level movements 8 3.3. Clay sedimentation and initial soil formation at a constant sea level . 9 3.4. Clay sedimentation during a rise in sea level 9 3.5. Erosion and ridge formation 11 3.6. Initial and progressive soil formation after a drop in sea level . 11 3.7. Soil formation in riverain and estuarine deposits 12 4. Coropina series 13 4.1. Para deposits 13 4.2. Lelydorp deposits 15 4.3. Riverain and estuarine terraces 17 5. Demerara Series 19 5.1. Mara deposits 21 5.2. Coronie deposits 23 5.2.1. Wanica phase 23 5.2.2. Moleson phase 24 5.2.3. Comowine phase 25 5.2.4. Riverain and estuarine Coronie deposits 26 6. Peat growing above sea level 28 7. Dating of the sedimentation sequence 29 7.1.
    [Show full text]
  • Zoologische Mededelingen Uitgegeven Door Het
    ZOOLOGISCHE MEDEDELINGEN UITGEGEVEN DOOR HET RIJKSMUSEUM VAN NATUURLIJKE HISTORIE TE LEIDEN (MINISTERIE VAN CULTUUR, RECREATIE EN MAATSCHAPPELIJK WERK) Deel 48 no. 8 16 mei 1974 THE LAND PROSOBRANCHIA OF SURINAME WITH THE DESCRIPTION OF TWO NEW SPECIES OF NEOCYCLOTUS by C. O. VAN REGTEREN ALTENA Rijksmuseum van Natuurlijke Historie With 3 plates Vernhout (1914) was the first to publish an account of the land and fresh- water Mollusca of Suriname. In this publication he assembled not only the older literature in which species were mentioned from Suriname, but also he named the Mollusca collected by seven expeditions and some travellers, and included in his paper the material which W. C. van Heurn collected during his trip in 1911. So he laid a sound basis for future investigations. In the present paper only the land Prosobranchia are treated. On this matter, so far as I know, only one paper has been published since 1914. This paper (Altena, 1960) mentioned Lucidella lirata (Pfeiffer) from Tamba- redjo and Sidoredjo in the Saramacca district. The Rijksmuseum van Natuurlijke Historie received specimens from Suri- name from many persons to whom I am much indebted for their cooperation. Thanks are also due to Mr. H. E. Coomans who sent me the specimens on loan, which were collected in 1926 by D. L. Fernandes. Here follows a list which mentions in chronological sequence the collectors with the months and the years in which they collected, together with the abbreviations under which they are mentioned in the text. F : D. L. Fernandes, Wilhelmina Gebergte Expedition, VII-VIII 1926 (for the route, see: Tijdschr.
    [Show full text]
  • Is There Gold in All That Glitters? Indigenous Peoples and Mining in Suriname
    Is There Gold In All That Glitters? Indigenous Peoples and Mining in Suriname Prepared for a project funded by the Inter-American Development Bank’s Canadian Technical Assistance Program (CANTAP) funding By Bente Molenaar The North-South Institute November 1, 2007 The North-South Institute (NSI) is a charitable corporation established in 1976 to provide profession- al, policy-relevant research on relations between industrialized and developing countries. The results of this research are made available to policy-makers, interested groups, and the general public to help generate greater understanding and informed discussion of development questions. The Institute is independent and cooperates with a wide range of Canadian and international organizations working in related activities. The views expressed in this paper are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect views held by the Inter-American Development Bank or The North-South Institute. Omissions and mistakes are entirely the responsibility of the author. Corrections and comments can be sent to [email protected]. The draft of this report was completed November 1, 2007. Available at: www.nsi-ins.ca Layout and design: Marcelo Saavedra-Vargas ([email protected]) Photo Credit: Viviane Weitzner The North-South Institute Association of Indigenous L’Institut Nord-Sud Village Leaders in Suriname © The Inter-American Development Bank, 2008. IND I GENOUS PEO P LES AND MI N I NG I N SUR I NA M E Table of Contents Abbreviations and acronyms. ii Acknowledgements. .1 Executive summary. .2 Introduction . .3 1. Setting the scene: a brief overview of the actors, history, country information and politics.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Country Environmental Profile Version 4Th February 2004 1
    Draft Country Environmental Profile Version 4th February 2004 1. Executive summary Will be incorporated when document is finalised. 2. Background This Country Environmental Profile was constructed to accompany the Joint Annual Review as a mandatory annex. As there are no previous country profiles available for Suriname, the main sources for the information provided in this profile were the consul tees and the documents they have provided: NIMOS, IDB, STINASU, the Dutch Embassy (Dhr. Noordam), Stichting Schoon Suriname, UNDP, WWF, Conservation International, Ministry of ATM (these still need to consulted). The profile is based on the current information available. As there are a number of areas were information was unavailable, this draft environmental profile is in certain areas incomplete. We recommend that the draft CEP will be reviewed by a consultant to fill in the blanks and add some more depth to the profile. 2.1 Physical conditions The Republic of Suriname is situated along the north coast of South America between 2- 6° N and 54-58° W, bordering in the east with French Guiana, in the south with Brazil, in the west with Guyana and in the north with the Atlantic Ocean. The historical borders of Suriname are established either by rivers or by watershed, in the east and west by the Marowijne and Corantijn Rivers respectively, and in the south by the watershed between the Amazonian basin and the basins of the Suriname Rivers. The second of the three Guianas in size and population, it has a human population of approximately 433,000 in a land area of 166,000 km², the largest concentration being in Paramaribo, the capital of the Republic Suriname.
    [Show full text]
  • ESIA) with An
    SURINAME Public Disclosure Authorized Saramacca Canal System Rehabilitation Project Preliminary Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) with an Public Disclosure Authorized Environmental and Social Management Plan (ESMP) Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized November 2018 Table of Contents ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS ..................................................................................... i EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..................................................................................................... iii Background ................................................................................................................................................ iii Project Description ..................................................................................................................................... iv Analysis of Alternatives ............................................................................................................................... v Legal, Regulatory, and Policy Framework .................................................................................................... v Applicable World Bank Safeguard Policies .................................................................................................. vi ESIA Process, Consultation, and Review Process ....................................................................................... vii Environmental and Social Baseline Information and Data .......................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Participatory Mapping in Lands of Indigenous Peoples and Maroons in Suriname
    SUPPORT FOR THE SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT OF THE INTERIOR -COLLECTIVE RIGHTS PARTICIPATORY MAPPING IN LANDS OF INDIGENOUS PEOPLES AND MAROONS IN SURINAME FINAL SUMMARY REPORT December 2010 THE AMAZON CONSERVATION TEAM Doekhieweg Oost 24, PARAMARIBO , SURINAME , PH: (597) 568606 FAX: (597) 6850169. EMAIL: [email protected] . WEB: WWW.ACT-SURINAME.ORG TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS………………………………………………………………………………………… 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY………………………………………………………………………………………….. 4 1. INTRODUCTION ……………………………………………………………………………………. 6 2. METHODOLOGY…………………………………………………………………………………… 9 3. COMMUNITY MAPPING PROCESS IN THE INTERIOR OF SURINAME.………………….. 14 3.1 THE INTERIOR AND ITS TRIBAL COMMUNITIES…………………………………………. 14 3.2 TRIBAL MAPPING PROCESSES…………………………………………………………….. 18 3.3 CHALLENGES IN THE COMMUNITY MAPPING PROCESS.…………………………….. 30 3.4 VERIFICATION OF FIELD DATA…………………………………………………………….. 32 3.5 GIS PROCESSING OF FIELD DATA INTO ONE MAP……………………………………… 33 REFERENCES…………….……………………………………………………………………………………… 35 ANNEX 1: ACT TRAINING MANUAL FOR GPS USE AND DATA TRANSFER….………….. 36 ANNEX 2: EXAMPLE OF COMMUNITY WORKSHOP RESULT…………………… …………. 37 ANNEX 3: ACT VERIFICATION MANUAL FOR COMMUNITY MAPPING………………….. 38 ANNEX 4: MAPPING EXPEDITIONS………………………………………………… …………. 39 ANNEX 5: VERIFICATION ROUNDS IN COMMUNITIES………………………………………. 40 ANNEX 6: COMMUNITY MAPPING PARTICIPANTS……………………………… …………. 41 ANNEX 7: TEAM OF CONSULTANTS…………………………………………………………… 47 ANNEX 8: TERMS OF REFERENCE FOR THE ASSIGNMENT…………………………………. 48 ANNEX 9: MEMORANDUM ACT‐GLIS………………………………………………………
    [Show full text]
  • Reisverslag Van De Expeditie West Suriname 1971
    REISVERSLAG VAN DE EXPEDITIE WEST SURINAME 1971 door D. C. GEIJSKES Rijksmuseum van Natuurlijke Historie, Leiden (met 1 kaart, 1 tabel en 8 platen) 1. Inleiding. 2. Verloop van de expeditie. 3. De voorbereidingen en de reis naar de Nickerie rivier. 4. De tocht op de Nickerie rivier (27 jan.-22 febr.). 5. De tocht op de Maratakka rivier (25 febr.-9 mrt). 6. Het verblijf te Wageningen en in Nw-Nickerie, met het onderzoek van de Nanni- kreek (10-21 mrt.). 7. De tocht op de Corantijn, in de Kaboerikreek en in de Kabalebo rivier (22 mrt.- 12 april). 8. De terugtocht. 1. INLEIDING De zoölogische expeditie naar het Westen van Suriname in het voorjaar van 1971 uitgevoerd, werd door het Rijksmuseum van Natuurlijke Historie te Leiden georganiseerd en door de Stichting Wotro in Den Haag gesub- sidieerd*). Zij werd gehouden van 19 januari tot eind april 1971. Van het museum te Leiden namen aan de tocht deel de leden: Dr. D. C. Geijskes (leider en entomoloog), Dr. M. Boeseman (ichthyoloog) en P. Staffeleu (technisch assistent A) voor het verzamelen en prepareren van zoogdieren en vogels. Te Paramaribo sloot zich daarbij aan D. G. Reeder, onder- opzichter bij 's Lands Bosbeheer, die de herpetologie (Amphibia, Reptilia) voor zijn rekening nam en ook botanisch verzamelde. Het doel van de expeditie was het verzamelen van dieren in het gebied van de Nickerie rivier, de Maratakka, het Nannibekken en een gedeelte van de Beneden Corantijn, inclusief de Kaboerikreek en de Kabalebo rivier tot aan de Avanavero-vallen. De aanleiding hiertoe was, dat ten eerste over dit gedeelte van Suriname zoölogisch weinig bekend was en ten tweede dat door de vergevorderde plannen om West Suriname tot economische ontwikkeling te brengen, de natuurlijke situatie daar bedreigd wordt.
    [Show full text]