Vermont Railway System Hosts 2015 NRHS
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Vermont Rail Feasibility Study
Vermont Rail Feasibility study Vermont Agency of Transportation Final Report March 1993 Submitted by LS Transit Systems, Inc. In association with R.L. Banks & Associates, Inc. Resource Systems Group, Inc. CGA Consulting Services VERMONT RAIL FEASIBILITY STUDY FINAL REPORT Table of Contents Section Paae No. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Background Rail Services Considered Passenger Rail Feasibility Capital, Operating and Maintenance Costs Environmental lmpacts Evaluation of Options Shelburne Road Demonstration Project Synthesized Service Alternative Conclusions and Recommendations 1. INTRODUCTION Background Passenger Rail Service Freight Rail Service Policy Issues 2. PASSENGER RAIL FEASIBILITY Introduction Physical Inventory lntroduction Methodology Central Vermont Railway Washington County Railroad Vermont Railway Clarendon & Pittsford Railroad Green Mountain Railroad Operational Service Plans Commuter Service Shelbume Road Demonstration Service Amtrak Service Options Tourist Train Service Options Service Linkages Ridership/Patronage/Revenues Forecasting Rail Ridership Estimating Demand for Commuter-Type Service Estimating Demand for Inter-CiService Estimating Demand for Tourist Service Fares and Revenue Projections Ancillary Issues Economic and Environmental Impacts Short and Long-Term Facility and Rolling Stock Needs Train Control, Signaling and Communications Grade Crossings Safety Cost Estimates Capital Costs - Trackwork VERMONT RAIL FEASIBILITY STUDY FINAL REPORT Table of Contents (continued) Section Paae No. Capital Costs - Train Control, Signaling and Communications .Capital Costs - Commuter Stations Capital Costs - Rolling Stock Operating and Maintenance Costs Funding Issues Shelbume Road Demonstration Project Investment in Upgrading the Core Railroad Network Action Plan Shelbume Road Demonstration Project Tourist Train Implementation Preliminary Market Plan Evaluation of Options Amtrak Connections Commuter Service Shelburne Road Demonstration Project Synthesized Service Alternative Synthesized Service Plan 3. FUTURE UTILIZATION OF RAIL INFRASTRUCTURE lntroduction . -
MD Rail Plan
Maryland State Rail Plan Project Update Presented to: Baltimore Regional Transportation Board Freight Movement Task Force Presented by: Harry Romano, MDOT OFM Date: March 25, 2021 Agenda » Introduction » Background, Plan Outline, Schedule » Vision and Goals » Review Project Types » Coordination and Outreach » Next Steps 2 Real-Time Feedback Using Poll Everywhere 3 Poll Everywhere #1: In one word, what do you see as the greatest opportunity for rail in Maryland? Poll Everywhere #2: In one word, what concept should not be left out of the Maryland State Rail Plan? 5 6 Background, Plan Outline, and Schedule 7 Why Is Maryland Updating the State Rail Plan? » Federal requirement per the 2008 Passenger Rail Investment and Improvement Act (PRIIA), affirmed in federal surface transportation bills, 4-year update per the FAST Act » Positions the state and rail stakeholders for federal funding » Outlines public and private investments and policies needed to ensure the efficient, safe, and sustainable movement of freight and passenger by rail 8 What Does a State Rail Plan Cover? Commuter Rail Freight Rail Intercity Passenger Rail 9 Background – Maryland’s Freight Rail Network Total Miles Operated Miles Owned, Miles Owned, Not Railroad Miles Leased (Except Trackage Rights Operated Operated Trackage Rights) Class I Railroads CSX Transportation 5 455 7 460 86 Norfolk Southern Railway 59 42 59 200 Total Class I Railroads 5 514 49 519 286 Class II Railroads Wheeling and Lake Erie Railroad 25 Class III Railroads Canton Railroad 16 16 Georges Creek Railway -
September 25, 2017 Volume 37
SEPTEMBER 25, 2017 ■■■■■■■■■■ VOLUME 37 ■■■■■■■■■■ NUMBER 9 CLUB IN TRANSITION-4 The Semaphore David N. Clinton, Editor-in-Chief CONTRIBUTING EDITORS Southeastern Massachusetts…………………. Paul Cutler, Jr. “The Operator”………………………………… Paul Cutler III Cape Cod News………………………………….Skip Burton Boston Globe Reporter………………………. Brendan Sheehan Boston Herald Reporter……………………… Jim South Wall Street Journal Reporter....………………. Paul Bonanno, Jack Foley Rhode Island News…………………………… Tony Donatelli Empire State News…………………………… Dick Kozlowski Amtrak News……………………………. .. Rick Sutton, Russell Buck “The Chief’s Corner”……………………… . Fred Lockhart PRODUCTION STAFF Publication………………………………… ….. Al Taylor Al Munn Jim Ferris Bryan Miller Web Page …………………..…………………… Savery Moore Club Photographer……………………………….Joe Dumas The Semaphore is the monthly (except July) newsletter of the South Shore Model Railway Club & Museum (SSMRC) and any opinions found herein are those of the authors thereof and of the Editors and do not necessarily reflect any policies of this organization. The SSMRC, as a non-profit organization, does not endorse any position. Your comments are welcome! Please address all correspondence regarding this publication to: The Semaphore, 11 Hancock Rd., Hingham, MA 02043. ©2017 E-mail: [email protected] Club phone: 781-740-2000. Web page: www.ssmrc.org VOLUME 37 ■■■■■ NUMBER 9 ■■■■■ SEPTEMBER 2017 CLUB OFFICERS BILL OF LADING President………………….Jack Foley Vice-President…….. …..Dan Peterson Chief’s Corner ...... …….….3 Treasurer………………....Will Baker Contests ................ ………..3 Secretary……………….....Dave Clinton Clinic……………..….…….5 Chief Engineer……….. .Fred Lockhart Directors……………… ...Bill Garvey (’18) Editor’s Notes. ….…....….12 ……………………….. .Bryan Miller (‘18) ……………………… ….Roger St. Peter (’19) Members .............. ….…....13 …………………………...Rick Sutton (‘19) Memories ............. .………..4 Potpourri .............. ..……….6 Running Extra ...... ………..13 ON THE COVER: (Clockwise from top left) Mechanical Committee room; Model Shop clinic; Woodshop; back of temp. -
Federal Railroad Administration Fiscal Year 2017 Enforcement Report
Federal Railroad Administration Fiscal Year 2017 Enforcement Report Table of Contents I. Introduction II. Summary of Inspections and Audits Performed, and of Enforcement Actions Recommended in FY 2017 A. Railroad Safety and Hazmat Compliance Inspections and Audits 1. All Railroads and Other Entities (e.g., Hazmat Shippers) Except Individuals 2. Railroads Only B. Summary of Railroad Safety Violations Cited by Inspectors, by Regulatory Oversight Discipline or Subdiscipline 1. Accident/Incident Reporting 2. Grade Crossing Signal System Safety 3. Hazardous Materials 4. Industrial Hygiene 5. Motive Power and Equipment 6. Railroad Operating Practices 7. Signal and train Control 8. Track C. FRA and State Inspections of Railroads, Sorted by Railroad Type 1. Class I Railroads 2. Probable Class II Railroads 3. Probable Class III Railroads D. Inspections and Recommended Enforcement Actions, Sorted by Class I Railroad 1. BNSF Railway Company 2. Canadian National Railway/Grand Trunk Corporation 3. Canadian Pacific Railway/Soo Line Railroad Company 4. CSX Transportation, Inc. 5. The Kansas City Southern Railway Company 6. National Railroad Passenger Corporation 7. Norfolk Southern Railway Company 8. Union Pacific Railroad Company III. Summaries of Civil Penalty Initial Assessments, Settlements, and Final Assessments in FY 2017 A. In General B. Summary 1—Brief Summary, with Focus on Initial Assessments Transmitted C. Breakdown of Initial Assessments in Summary 1 1. For Each Class I Railroad Individually in FY 2017 2. For Probable Class II Railroads in the Aggregate in FY 2017 3. For Probable Class III Railroads in the Aggregate in FY 2017 4. For Hazmat Shippers in the Aggregate in FY 2017 5. -
Prn 198803.Pdf
. the mere mention of the name brings forth railroad images larger than life. It wasn't just tracks and trains.It wasn't just an Indiana institution-though it MONON'certainly was that. Oh. my, no. What the Monon was ...well, it was every American railroad. every American hometown. every American underdog rolled into one. Why. the Monon was practically human. Its birth was a cause for . rejoicing. its operation a source of Hoosier pride. And when it died. a thousand legends lived on. Now, legend and fact are woven together in a brand-new, finely crafted illustrated history of the Monon. We take you from beginning to merger into the L&N. from Louisville to French Lick to Indianapolis to Michigan City to Chicago .•. from Hoosierland to hotshot. from 4-4-0 to Century 420. We're proud to announce the creation of Monon-The Hoosier Line by Gary and Stephen Dolzall. This book is in production and will be published by Interurban Press in the Fall of 1987. Its 'edit!o�r=is=;;�=:�; Roaring Fork Railroad Begins Private Car Service. We offer three levels of service: First class, Vistadome and coach starting as low as $99 one-way Denver to Glenwood Springs. Ticket price includes open bar and fine dining in our VistaDiner. Our route over the Continental Divide includes the famous tun nel district and its spectacular views of the Rocky Mountain wilderness. Departs Denver every Saturday through March for Glenwood Springs, Grand Junction and Salt Lake City. Returns each Sunday. CaD (303) 893-8922 collect for reservations and information. -
4.1 Introduction Ocotillo Wind Energy Facility
4.1 Introduction Ocotillo Wind Energy Facility 4.1 Introduction This chapter assesses environmental consequences or impacts that would result from the implementation of the Proposed Action or the alternatives described in Chapter 2. These analyses consider direct, indirect, and cumulative impacts of the Proposed Action and alternatives, including both short-term impacts during construction and decommissioning, and long-term impacts during operations. This chapter also identifies mitigation measures to address adverse impacts and summarizes the residual and unavoidable adverse impacts on an issue-by-issue basis. The scope of the impact analyses presented in this chapter is commensurate with the level of detail for the alternatives provided in Chapter 2, Proposed Action and Alternatives, and the availability and/or quality of data necessary to assess impacts. Baseline conditions for assessing the potential environmental impacts are described in Chapter 3. The methodology for this assessment conforms with the guidance found in the following sections of the Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) regulations for implementing NEPA: 40 Code of Federal Regulation (CFR) Section 1502.24, Methodology and Scientific Accuracy; 40 CFR Section 1508.7, Cumulative Impact; and 40 CFR Section 1508.8, Effects. The CEQ regulations require agencies to “rigorously explore and objectively evaluate” the impacts of the alternatives. The methodologies used in the impact assessment also conform to the requirements of the CEQA, Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq.), including the Guidelines for Implementation of the CEQA, Title 14 California Code of Regulations section 15000 et seq. 4.1.1 Analytical Assumptions The following impacts analysis was conducted with the following assumptions: The laws, regulations, and policies applicable to the BLM authorizing ROW grants for renewable energy development facilities would be applied consistently for all action alternatives. -
Watertown Historical Society Watertownhistoricalsociety.Org Zftmee Vol
Property of the Watertown Historical Society watertownhistoricalsociety.org Zftmee Vol. 50 No. 34 PUBLISHED BY PRIME PUBLISHERS, INC. Septembers 1994 ^ 0 Pages Price 65 cents Serving Watertown and Oakville Since 1947 State Requests Flood Aid Local Crews Work on Damaged Roads by Susan Faber Federal assistance may be on ihe way for Watertown and five other towns hit hard by last week's flash floods, which are estimated to have cost the region more than $1.4 million. In a letter written Monday, Gov. Lowell P. Weicker Jr. asked President Clinton to declare Connecticut a disaster area, requesting public assistance specifically for LitchfieldCounty where the towns of Washington, New Milford, Bethlehem, Woodbury, Roxbury and Watertown sustained heavy damage. "I have determined that (his situation is of such severity and magnitude that effective response is beyond the capabilities of the state and affected local governments and thai federal assistance is required to supplement resources of the state, local governments, disaster relief organizations and insurance compensation for disas- ter-related losses," Gov. Weicker wrote. Connecticut Senators Chris Dodd (D) and Joe Lieberman (D) also urged President Clinton to declare the area a federal disaster area. "The flash floods which resulted from the excessive amounts of rai n caused severe damage to a number of roads and bridges, placing an enormous burden on municipal resources," wrote the senators in a letter to the President "The costs associated with unexpected disasters such as these floods can prove to be devastating to already strapped local budg- ets." Damages to public property in Watcnown will run anywhere The Rev. -
BMWMOA Rally 2006
So Many Things – So Little Time How to use this interactive document: 1. Do not print this document, not at first. The links will 6. Exploring the document lead you hundreds of inter- could easily take hours. esting and fun places. That’s fine especially if you live when the Northeast. But 2. Connect to the internet and planning and scheming is open this document – Ver- half the fun. Think of the mont Attractions. time and gasoline you will save by exploring Vermont 3. Before you go much further by using the internet. please put the following number in your cell phone: 7. BMW MOA will have an 1-802-847-2434. That is the unbeatable program of Emergency Department speakers, and special events. and Level I Trauma Center Plan your Vermont rides in BURLINGTON. You and exploration now. There might save a life while at the is much more to see and do rally. than time will allow so pre- pare now for a memorable 4. Start by exploring page 4 rally. which is a summary of the better known sites in Ver- 8. Vermont will have great mont. weather to enjoy and unbeat- able roads to ride. If you are 5. If you are connected to the looking for the local club web you will be connected to come visit us here. the website tied to that link. Come Early – Stay Late. Page 1 of 48 Last update: 1/30/2006 So Many Things – So Little Time 2006 will be one of the best rallies When first starting this project I hoped to ever! Vermont is an outstanding riding locale. -
Eagle Mountain Pumped Storage Project Draft License Application Exhibit E, Volume 1, Public Information Palm Desert, California
Eagle Mountain Pumped Storage Project Draft License Application Exhibit E, Volume 1, Public Information Palm Desert, California Submitted to: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Submitted by: Eagle Crest Energy Company Date: June 16, 2008 Project No. 080470 ©2008 Eagle Crest Energy DRAFT LICENSE APPLICATION- EXHIBIT E Table of Contents 1 General Description 1-1 1.1 Project Description 1-1 1.2 Project Area 1-2 1.2.1 Existing Land Use 1-4 1.3 Compatibility with Landfill Project 1-5 1.3.1 Land Exchange 1-5 1.3.2 Landfill Operations 1-6 1.3.3 Landfill Permitting 1-6 1.3.4 Compatibility of Specific Features 1-7 1.3.4.1 Potential Seepage Issues 1-8 1.3.4.2 Ancillary Facilities Interferences 1-9 2 Water Use and Quality 2-1 2.1 Surface Waters 2-1 2.1.1 Instream Flow Uses of Streams 2-1 2.1.2 Water quality of surface water 2-1 2.1.3 Existing lakes and reservoirs 2-1 2.1.4 Impacts of Construction and Operation 2-1 2.1.5 Measures recommended by Federal and state agencies to protect surface water 2-1 2.2 Description of Existing Groundwater 2-1 2.2.1 Springs and Wells 2-3 2.2.2 Water Bearing Formations 2-3 2.2.3 Hydraulic Characteristics 2-4 2.2.4 Groundwater Levels 2-5 2.2.5 Groundwater Flow Direction 2-6 2.2.6 Groundwater Storage 2-7 2.2.7 Groundwater Pumping 2-7 2.2.8 Recharge Sources 2-8 2.2.9 Outflow 2-9 2.2.10 Perennial Yield 2-9 2.3 Potential Impacts to Groundwater Supply 2-9 2.3.1 Proposed Project Water Supply 2-9 2.3.2 Perennial Yield 2-10 2.3.3 Regional Groundwater Level Effects 2-12 2.3.4 Local Groundwater Level Effects 2-15 2.3.5 Groundwater -
Final Data Collection for Rock Source Investigation
SALTON SEA ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION PLAN Final Follow-On Data Collection for Rock Source Evaluation April 2005 Table of Contents Items Page Follow-On Data Collection for Rock Source Evaluation................................................................ 1 Background ........................................................................................................................ 1 Task Objective ................................................................................................................... 3 Site Visits ........................................................................................................................... 3 Mesquite Mine.................................................................................................................... 4 Site Description ..................................................................................................... 4 History........................................................................................................ 4 Site Ownership .......................................................................................... 4 Site Geology .............................................................................................. 4 Existing Infrastructure................................................................................ 6 Availability of Material/Rock....................................................................... 6 Existing Environmental Documentation and Permits/Plans....................... 7 Conceptual Plan to Obtain -
1 Volume 53 Number 3 District 2—Chapter Website: Www
1 VOLUME 53 NUMBER 3 DISTRICT 2—CHAPTER WEBSITE: WWW.NRHS1.ORG MARCH, 2021 CHANGING OF THE GUARD With this issue, for the first time in over 15 years, Ed Mayover is not the editor of the Lancaster Dispatcher. As the new editor, I am both humbled and terrified! Ed has set such a high bar of quality and workmanship in producing a professional newsletter for 185 months. Reading each of his issues has always been a joy. Hopefully all of Ed’s past issues will inspire me to do almost as well as he has done. By way of introduction, I am a volunteer at the Railroad Museum of Pennsylvania and of course , a life-long railfan. My dad was a freight sales representative for the Canadian National, so it must be in my blood. My business career was in sales in the automotive aftermarket, cumulating as the executive director of the Maryland state automotive trade association. Here I produced nine newsletters annually for four years, so I do have experience in this endeav- or. I am not alone, as Ed could only be replaced by three people! Joining me are two unindicted coconspirators from the RRMPA, Steve Ferrell and Tom Fluck. Steve has agreed to be co-editor and Tom a contributing editor. Steve is the Treasurer of the Friends of the Railroad Museum and Steve, Tom and I are on the Finance Committee of the Friends. Pre-covid, we often rode on “Ride with Me Steve:” excursions via Amtrak, SEPTA and NJT. We will bring you some of these trip reports in future issues. -
PC*MILER Geocode Files Reference Guide | Page 1 File Usage Restrictions All Geocode Files Are Copyrighted Works of ALK Technologies, Inc
Reference Guide | Beta v10.3.0 | Revision 1 . 0 Copyrights You may print one (1) copy of this document for your personal use. Otherwise, no part of this document may be reproduced, transmitted, transcribed, stored in a retrieval system, or translated into any language, in any form or by any means electronic, mechanical, magnetic, optical, or otherwise, without prior written permission from ALK Technologies, Inc. Copyright © 1986-2017 ALK Technologies, Inc. All Rights Reserved. ALK Data © 2017 – All Rights Reserved. ALK Technologies, Inc. reserves the right to make changes or improvements to its programs and documentation materials at any time and without prior notice. PC*MILER®, CoPilot® Truck™, ALK®, RouteSync®, and TripDirect® are registered trademarks of ALK Technologies, Inc. Microsoft and Windows are registered trademarks of Microsoft Corporation in the United States and other countries. IBM is a registered trademark of International Business Machines Corporation. Xceed Toolkit and AvalonDock Libraries Copyright © 1994-2016 Xceed Software Inc., all rights reserved. The Software is protected by Canadian and United States copyright laws, international treaties and other applicable national or international laws. Satellite Imagery © DigitalGlobe, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Weather data provided by Environment Canada (EC), U.S. National Weather Service (NWS), U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), and AerisWeather. © Copyright 2017. All Rights Reserved. Traffic information provided by INRIX © 2017. All rights reserved by INRIX, Inc. Standard Point Location Codes (SPLC) data used in PC*MILER products is owned, maintained and copyrighted by the National Motor Freight Traffic Association, Inc. Statistics Canada Postal Code™ Conversion File which is based on data licensed from Canada Post Corporation.