DOCSLIB.ORG

Common Name Species AR01(C42) 11/9/2016 8.36 AM Barking Deer

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Common Name Species AR01(C42) 11/9/2016 8.36 AM Barking Deer Camera trap data AR01-AR10 (Aug 2016 - Oct 2016) Captured animal Camera no. Date Time Common name Species AR01(C42) 11/9/2016 8.36 AM Barking deer (male) Muntiacus muntjak 12/9/2016 7.52 AM Wild boar Sus scrofa 16/9/2016 12.44 PM Wild boar Sus scrofa 20/9/2016 09.10 AM Barking deer Muntiacus muntjak 20/9/2016 10.31 AM Wild boar Sus scrofa 20/9/2016 11.49 AM Wild boar Sus scrofa 25/9/2016 7.32 AM Wild boar Sus scrofa 11/10/2016 4.40 PM Wild boar Sus scrofa AR02(C42) 26/8/2016 8.16 PM Wild boar Sus scrofa 27/8/2016 3.00 PM Barking deer Muntiacus muntjak 1/9/2016 3.31 PM Wild boar Sus scrofa 2/9/2016 1.23 PM Barking deer (male) Muntiacus muntjak 16/9/2016 2.35 PM Wild boar Sus scrofa 19/9/2016 9.03AM Unknown bird Unknown bird 20/9/2016 10.19 AM Wild boar Sus scrofa 23/9/2016 1.43 AM Wild boar Sus scrofa 24/9/2016 9.13 AM Wild boar Sus scrofa 10/10/2016 7.46 AM Wild boar Sus scrofa AR03(C42) 24/8/2016 7.19 PM Barking deer Muntiacus muntjak 6/9/2016 10.09 AM Bird Unknown bird 6/10/2016 2.46 AM Tapir Tapirus indicus 14/10/2016 9.42 AM Wild boar Sus scrofa 16/10/2016 2.36 PM Wild boar Sus scrofa AR04(C42) 26/8/2016 3.42 PM Wild boar Sus scrofa 9/9/2016 7.39 AM Wild boar Sus scrofa 14/9/2016 11.10 AM Pale-thighed langur Presbytis siamensis 15/9/2016 7.19 AM Mouse-deer Tragulus sp. 19/9/2016 1.06 PM Pig-tailed macaque Macaca nemestrina 27/9/2016 9.11 AM Wild fowl Unknown wild fowl 8/10/2016 5.11 PM Wild boar Sus scrofa Camera trap data AR01-AR10 (Aug 2016 - Oct 2016) Captured animal Camera no. Date Time Common name Species AR05(C42) 8/9/2016 4.57 PM Wild boar Sus scrofa 9/9/2016 5.01 PM Wild boar Sus scrofa 16/9/2016 6.08 PM Mouse-deer Tragulus sp. 18/9/2016 7.46 PM Mouse-deer Tragulus sp. 19/9/2016 4.22 PM Pig-tailed macaque Macaca nemestrina 20/9/2016 10.28 AM Wild boar Sus scrofa 22/9/2016 1.14 PM Wild boar Sus scrofa 22/9/2016 9.21 PM Barking deer Muntiacus muntjak 24/9/2016 8.12 AM Wild boar Sus scrofa AR06(C42) 23/8/2016 08.28 AM Wild boar Sus scrofa 27/8/2016 1.26 AM Barking deer Muntiacus muntjak 6/9/2016 2.19 AM Pig Sus domesticus 19/9/2016 4.22 PM Pig-tailed macaque Macaca nemestrina 20/9/2016 10.31 AM Pig Sus domesticus 4/10/2016 6.30 AM Mouse-deer Tragulus sp. AR07(C42) 31/8/2016 11.09 AM Barking deer Muntiacus muntjak 1/9/2016 2.52 PM Pig Sus domesticus 3/9/2016 11.45 AM Monkey Macaca sp. 4/9/2016 9.36 AM Wild boar Sus scrofa 5/9/2016 10.43 AM Long-tailed macaque Macaca fascicularis 7/9/2016 2.59 AM Wild boar Sus scrofa 2/10/2016 8.23 AM Barking deer Muntiacus muntjak 21/10/2016 3.35 PM Barking deer Muntiacus muntjak 27/10/2016 8.34 AM Wild boar Sus scrofa AR08(C42) 27/8/2016 2.24 PM Barking deer Muntiacus muntjak 31/8/2016 10.22 AM Barking deer Muntiacus muntjak 31/8/2016 1.15 PM Wild boar Sus scrofa 11/9/2016 4.50 AM Wild boar Sus scrofa 15/9/2016 3.00 AM Wild boar Sus scrofa 16/9/2016 1.27 PM Wild boar Sus scrofa 26/9/2016 6.53 AM Wild boar Sus scrofa 27/10/2016 8.11 PM Banded civet Hemigalus derbyanus Camera trap data AR01-AR10 (Aug 2016 - Oct 2016) Captured animal Camera no. Date Time Common name Species AR09(C42) 11/9/2016 4.23 AM Wild boar Sus scrofa 12/9/2016 6.44 AM Mouse-deer Tragulus sp. 14/9/2016 6.59 AM Mouse-deer Tragulus sp. 15/9/2016 7.00 AM Mouse-deer Tragulus sp. 16/9/2016 3.48 AM Mouse-deer Tragulus sp. 17/9/2016 12.29 AM Mouse-deer Tragulus sp. 19/9/2016 2.45 PM Pig-tailed macaque Macaca nemestrina 20/9/2016 3.27 AM Mousedeer Tragulus sp. 20/9/2016 3.24 PM Wild boars Sus scrofa 21/9/2016 6.47 AM Mouse-deer Tragulus sp. 23/9/2016 9.44 AM Lizard Unknown lizard 28/9/2016 4.04 AM Tapir Tapirus indicus 28/9/2016 5.58 PM Wild boar Sus scrofa 2/10/2016 6.59 PM Barking deer Muntiacus muntjak 6/10/2016 6.55 PM Mouse-deer Tragulus sp. 7/10/2016 7.17 AM Mouse-deer Tragulus sp. 8/10/2016 6.46 AM Mouse-deer Tragulus sp. 9/10/2016 1.38 AM Banded linsang Prionodon linsang 13/10/2016 3.19 PM Wild boar Sus scrofa 16/10/2016 6:51 AM Sun bear Helarctos malayanus 16/10/2016 2.55 AM Rodent Unknown rodent 19/10/2016 10.38 AM Mouse-deer Tragulus sp. 21/10/2016 6.33 AM Mouse-deer Tragulus sp. AR10(C42) 15/9/2016 8.18 PM Wild boar Sus scrofa 17/9/2016 3.27 AM Wild boar Sus scrofa 21/9/2016 11.27 PM Bird Unknown bird 23/9/2016 7.12 PM Wild boar Sus scrofa 27/9/2016 5.39 AM Wild boar Sus scrofa 28/9/2016 9.05 PM Wild boar Sus scrofa 13/10/2016 5.22 AM Barking deer Muntiacus muntjak Camera trap data AR01-AR10 (Nov 2016 - Jan 2017) Captured animal Camera no. Date Time Common name Species AR01(C65) 2/11/2016 4.41 PM Squirrel Unknown Squirrel 7/11/2016 6.55 PM Squirrel Unknown Squirrel 3/12/2016 2.4 PM Barking deer (Male) Muntiacus muntjak AR04(C65) 4/11/2016 3.43 AM Banded civet Hemigalus derbyanus 22/11/2016 1.49 PM Wild boar Sus scrofa 9/12/2016 12.56 PM Barking deer Muntiacus muntjak 16/12/2016 4.31 PM Wild boar Sus scrofa 18/12/2016 10.01 AM Wild boar Sus scrofa AR05(C65) 21/12/2016 1.52 PM Barking deer Muntiacus muntjak 10/1/2017 12.35 PM Barking deer Muntiacus muntjak 10/1/2017 4.27 PM Barking deer Muntiacus muntjak 12/1/2017 6.32 PM Barking deer Muntiacus muntjak AR06(C65) 13/1/2017 8.28 AM Monkey Macaca sp. AR07(C65) 1/11/2016 12.05 PM Wild boar Sus scrofa 19/11/2016 7.43 AM Bird Unknown Bird 16/12/2016 7.37 AM Barking deer Muntiacus muntjak 16/12/2016 6.09 PM Wild boar Sus scrofa 17/12/2016 11.20 AM Wild boar Sus scrofa 17/12/2016 5.51 PM Barking deer Muntiacus muntjak 18/12/2016 10.08 AM Wild boar Sus scrofa AR08(C65) 3/11/2016 4.48 PM Barking deer Muntiacus muntjak AR09(C65) 22/11/2016 12.54 PM Wild boar Sus scrofa 19/12/2016 1.54 AM Mouse-deer Tragulus sp. 25/12/2016 5.22 AM Barking Deer Muntiacus muntjak 25/12/2016 12.06 PM Monkey Macaca sp. 7/1/2017 10.26 AM Long-tailed macaque Macaca fascicularis 10/1/2017 12.38 PM Barking Deer Muntiacus muntjak 12/1/2017 10.33 AM Barking Deer Muntiacus muntjak AR10(C65) 15/11/2016 5.34 AM Wild boar Sus scrofa Camera trap data AR01-AR10 (Feb 2017 - April 2017) Captured animal Camera no. Date Time Common name Species AR02(C42) 19/2/2017 10.70 AM Rodent Unknown rodent 19/2/2017 11.06 AM Long-tailed macaque Macaca fascicularis 20/2/2017 10.22 AM Macaque Macaca sp. 22/2/2017 3.54 AM Wild boar Sus scrofa 25/2/2017 8.21 AM Rodent Unknown rodent 27/2/2017 1.10 AM Barking deer Muntiacus muntjak 5/3/2017 7.31 AM Barking deer Muntiacus muntjak 1/4/2017 9.58 AM Macaque Macaca sp. AR06(C42) 16/4/2017 12.42 PM Macaque Macaca sp..
Load more

Recommended publications
  • MALE GENITAL ORGANS and ACCESSORY GLANDS of the LESSER MOUSE DEER, TRAGULUS Fa VAN/CUS
    MALE GENITAL ORGANS AND ACCESSORY GLANDS OF THE LESSER MOUSE DEER, TRAGULUS fA VAN/CUS M. K. VIDYADARAN, R. S. K. SHARMA, S. SUMITA, I. ZULKIFLI, AND A. RAZEEM-MAZLAN Faculty of Biomedical and Health Science, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400 UPM Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia (MKV), Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Sciences, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400 UPM Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia (RSKS, SS, /Z), Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/jmammal/article/80/1/199/844673 by guest on 01 October 2021 Department of Wildlife and National Parks, Zoo Melaka, 75450 Melaka, Malaysia (ARM) Gross anatomical features of the male genital organs and accessory genital glands of the lesser mouse deer (Tragulus javanicus) are described. The long fibroelastic penis lacks a prominent glans and is coiled at its free end to form two and one-half turns. Near the tight coils of the penis, on the right ventrolateral aspect, lies a V-shaped ventral process. The scrotum is prominent, unpigmented, and devoid of hair and is attached close to the body, high in the perineal region. The ovoid, obliquely oriented testes carry a large cauda and caput epididymis. Accessory genital glands consist of paired, lobulated, club-shaped vesic­ ular glands, and a pair of ovoid bulbourethral glands. A well-defined prostate gland was not observed on the surface of the pelvic urethra. Many features of the male genital organs of T. javanicus are pleisomorphic, being retained from suiod ancestors of the Artiodactyla. Key words: Tragulus javanicus, male genital organs, accessory genital glands, reproduc­ tion, anatomy, Malaysia The lesser mouse deer (Tragulus javan­ gulidae, and Bovidae (Webb and Taylor, icus), although a ruminant, possesses cer­ 1980).
    [Show full text]
  • Cervid Mixed-Species Table That Was Included in the 2014 Cervid RC
    Appendix III. Cervid Mixed Species Attempts (Successful) Species Birds Ungulates Small Mammals Alces alces Trumpeter Swans Moose Axis axis Saurus Crane, Stanley Crane, Turkey, Sandhill Crane Sambar, Nilgai, Mouflon, Indian Rhino, Przewalski Horse, Sable, Gemsbok, Addax, Fallow Deer, Waterbuck, Persian Spotted Deer Goitered Gazelle, Reeves Muntjac, Blackbuck, Whitetailed deer Axis calamianensis Pronghorn, Bighorned Sheep Calamian Deer Axis kuhili Kuhl’s or Bawean Deer Axis porcinus Saurus Crane Sika, Sambar, Pere David's Deer, Wisent, Waterbuffalo, Muntjac Hog Deer Capreolus capreolus Western Roe Deer Cervus albirostris Urial, Markhor, Fallow Deer, MacNeil's Deer, Barbary Deer, Bactrian Wapiti, Wisent, Banteng, Sambar, Pere White-lipped Deer David's Deer, Sika Cervus alfredi Philipine Spotted Deer Cervus duvauceli Saurus Crane Mouflon, Goitered Gazelle, Axis Deer, Indian Rhino, Indian Muntjac, Sika, Nilgai, Sambar Barasingha Cervus elaphus Turkey, Roadrunner Sand Gazelle, Fallow Deer, White-lipped Deer, Axis Deer, Sika, Scimitar-horned Oryx, Addra Gazelle, Ankole, Red Deer or Elk Dromedary Camel, Bison, Pronghorn, Giraffe, Grant's Zebra, Wildebeest, Addax, Blesbok, Bontebok Cervus eldii Urial, Markhor, Sambar, Sika, Wisent, Waterbuffalo Burmese Brow-antlered Deer Cervus nippon Saurus Crane, Pheasant Mouflon, Urial, Markhor, Hog Deer, Sambar, Barasingha, Nilgai, Wisent, Pere David's Deer Sika 52 Cervus unicolor Mouflon, Urial, Markhor, Barasingha, Nilgai, Rusa, Sika, Indian Rhino Sambar Dama dama Rhea Llama, Tapirs European Fallow Deer
    [Show full text]
  • 2013-Ross Et Al
    JOBNAME: No Job Name PAGE: 1 SESS: 9 OUTPUT: Thu Jan 31 01:23:45 2013 /v2451/blackwell/3G_journals/jzo_v0_i0/jzo_12018 Toppan Best-set Premedia Limited Journal Code: JZO Proofreader: Mony Article No: JZO12018 Delivery date: 30 Jan 2013 Page Extent: 11 Journal of Zoology. Print ISSN 0952-8369 Activity patterns and temporal avoidance by prey in response to Sunda clouded leopard predation risk J. Ross1*,2, A. J. Hearn1*,2 P. J. Johnson1 & D. W. Macdonald1 1 Wildlife Conservation Research Unit (WildCRU), Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK 2 2 Global Canopy Programme, Oxford, UK bs_bs_query Keywords Abstract activity patterns; circular statistics; overlap coefficient; Sunda clouded leopard; Little is known about the activity patterns of Bornean ungulates, or the temporal ungulate. interactions of these species with the Sunda clouded leopard Neofelis diardi. In this study, we use photographic capture data to quantify the activity patterns for the Correspondence Sunda clouded leopard and six potential prey species: bearded pig Sus barbatus, Joanna Ross, Wildlife Conservation Bornean yellow muntjac Muntiacus atherodes, red muntjac Muntiacus muntjak, Research Unit, Department of Zoology, lesser mouse deer Tragulus kanchil, greater mouse deer Tragulus napu, and sambar University of Oxford, The Recanati-Kaplan deer Rusa unicolor, and to calculate the overlap in activity patterns between these Centre, Tubney House, Abingdon Road, species. This is the first insight into the temporal interactions between the Sunda Tubney, Abingdon OX13 5QL, UK. clouded leopard and its potential prey. Sunda clouded leopards’ activity patterns Email: [email protected] overlapped most with those of sambar deer and greater mouse deer.
    [Show full text]
  • The (Sleeping) Beauty in the Beast T1 Extendash a Review on the Water
    Published by Associazione Teriologica Italiana Volume 28 (2): 121–133, 2017 Hystrix, the Italian Journal of Mammalogy Available online at: http://www.italian-journal-of-mammalogy.it doi:10.4404/hystrix–28.2-12362 Commentary The (sleeping) Beauty in the Beast – a review on the water deer, Hydropotes inermis Ann-Marie Schilling1,2,∗, Gertrud E. Rössner1,2,3 1SNSB Bayerische Staatssammlung für Paläontologie und Geologie, Richard-Wagner-Str. 10, 80333 Munich, Germany 2Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Richard-Wagner-Str. 10, 80333 Munich, Germany 3GeoBio-Center LMU, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Richard-Wagner-Str. 10, 80333 Munich, Germany Keywords: Abstract biogeography morphology The water deer, Hydropotes inermis (Cervidae, Mammalia), is a small, solitary cervid. It is native to phenotype China and Korea, but some feral populations also live in Europe. In contrast to other deer species, ecology where males are characterized by antlers and small/no upper canines, H. inermis lacks antlers, behaviour genetics but grows long upper canines. For this phenotype and particularities of its biology, the species phylogeny holds considerable potential not only for our understanding of cervid biology, but also for important Cervidae H. inermis fossil record questions about basic developmental and regenerative biology. However, populations conservation are decreasing, and many of the pressing scientific questions motivated by this peculiar species are still open. Here, we review the most different aspects of the species’ biology and discuss scientific publications ranging from the year of the species’ first description in 1870 until 2015. We briefly Article history: sketch its state of conservation, and we discuss the current understanding of its phylogeny.
    [Show full text]
  • The Jungle Times
    The Jungle Times Independent newsletter of: Est. 2008 Issue: 113 Inside this issue: Page 7: 10 years of DGFC Page 2: Arrivals Page 3: Visitors Page 5: Departures Page 6: Aberystwyth Field Course Page 7: 10 years of DGFC Page 8: State Action Plans Page 8: State Action Plans Page 9: Science Corner Page 10: Conservation Corner Page 11: Game September 2018 Page 2 Arrivals Jessica Shuttleworth Our final PTY of the year joins us from Oxfordshire. Jess studies Biological Sciences at Cardiff University and is particularly interested in Ecology and Conservation. She has always loved animals since growing up on a pig farm and her love of the outdoors was solidified when trekking through Norway for 3 weeks. She is looking forward to seeing all of Borneo’s amazing wildlife before carrying out her own project here at DG. September 2018 Page 3 Visitors Sabrina Herold Sabrina came from Switzerland to visit for 10 days to experience life at DGFC. She took part in many activities including night walks, primate boats, bird boats and tracking our collared tarsiers. Sabrina also helped to create a welcome pack for future PTYs and volunteers at DG to help future students get more of an idea of the centre before they arrive. Thank you Sabrina! September 2018 Page 4 Visitors – Cardiff University Professor Andrew Weightman, Dr Alison Weightman, Sarah Evans and Professor Susan Baker This month the centre had some visitors from Cardiff University! Professor Andy Weightman from Cardiff School of Biosciences, Sarah Evans, Manager of Cardiff Sustainable Places Research Institute, Professor Susan Baker from Cardiff School of Social Sciences and Dr Alison Weightman visited Borneo this month to attend the ten year anniversary celebration of DGFC.
    [Show full text]
  • Geographical Variation of the Skull of the Lesser Mouse Deer
    FULL PAPER Anatomy Geographical Variation of the Skull of the Lesser Mouse Deer Hideki ENDO1), Katsuhiro FUKUTA2), Junpei KIMURA3), Motoki SASAKI4) and Brian J. STAFFORD5,6) 1)Department of Zoology, National Science Museum, Tokyo, 3–23–1 Hyakunin-cho, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 169–0073, 2)Laboratory of Animal Morphology and Function, Graduate School of Bioagricutural Sciences, Nagoya University, Nagoya, Aichi 464–8601, 3)Department of Veterinary Anatomy, College of Bioresource Sciences, Nihon University, Fujisawa, Kanagawa 252–8610, 4)Department of Veterinary Anatomy, Obihiro University of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine, Obihiro, Hokkaido 080–8555, Japan, 5)Mammal Division, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington DC. and 6)Department of Anatomy, Howard University College of Medicine, Washington DC, U.S.A. (Received 21 January 2004/Accepted 1 June 2004) ABSTRACT. We examined the geographical variation of the skull size and shape of the lesser mouse deer (Tragulus javanicus) from Laos, Thailand, Peninsular Malaysia, Sumatra, Java, Borneo, Langkawi and some Islands of Tenasserim in Myanmar. Although the influence of the climatic condition on skull size was not confirmed in the mainland populations, the skull became rostro-caudally longer in the populations of Tenasserim and Sumatra because of island isolation effect. The skull size was classified into the following three clusters of localities from the matrix of Q-mode correlation coefficients: 1) Langkawi and Tenasserim, 2) Laos and Thailand, 3) Sumatra and Borneo. The skulls in the population of Java belong to the cluster of Langkawi and Tenasserim in male, however were morphologically similar to those in the cluster of Borneo and Sumatra.
    [Show full text]
  • The List of Threatened Wildlife and Their Categories. A. Critically
    THE LIST OF TERRESTRIAL THREATENED SPECIES AND THEIR CATEGORIES, AND THE LIST OF OTHER WILDLIFE SPECIES PURSUANT TO REPUBLIC ACT NO. 9147, OTHERWISE KNOWN AS THE WILDLIFE RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND PROTECTION ACT OF 2001 Definition of Terms 1. Threatened Species – is a general term to denote species or subspecies considered as critically endangered, endangered, vulnerable or other accepted categories of wildlife which population is at risk of extinction; 2. Critically Endangered Species – refers to a species or subspecies that is facing extremely high risk of extinction in the wild in the immediate future; 3. Endangered Species – refers to species or subspecies that is not critically endangered but which survival in the wild is unlikely if the causal factors continue operating; 4. Vulnerable Species – refers to species or subspecies that is not critically endangered nor endangered but is under threat from adverse factors throughout their range and is likely to move to the endangered category in the near future; 5. Other Threatened Species – refers to species or subspecies that is not critically endangered, endangered nor vulnerable but is under threat from adverse factors, such as over collection, throughout their range and is likely to move to the vulnerable category in the near future; 6. Other Wildlife Species – refers to non-threatened species that have the tendency to become threatened due to predation and destruction of habitat or other similar causes as may be listed by the Secretary upon the recommendation of the National Wildlife Management Committee. The List of Threatened Wildlife and their Categories. A. Critically Endangered Species MAMMALS Family Scientific Name Common Name Bovidae 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Whales on Trees!
    Whales on Trees! How Many Times Did Mammals Return to the Sea? David Form Nashoba Regional High School Cetaceans Pinnipeds Sirenians Evolution of the Whales Mesonychids: Wolf - Related or Wolf-Like? Whales on Trees! Using DNA Evidence to Unravel the Story of the Evolution of the Whales There are three groups of mammals that live in the oceans; the whales and dolphins (the cetaceans), the seals and sea lions (the pinnipeds) and the manatees and dugongs (the sirenians). We can use DNA evidence to determine if the mammals returned to the sea only once or sea-dwelling mammals evolved on several occasions. If the first case is true, then the cetaceans, pinnipeds and sirenians will be more closely related to each other than to any land-dwelling mammals. On the other hand, if each of these groups are more closely related to different land-dwelling mammals, this would indicate that the ability to live in the water evolved several times in the mammals. The fossil evidence tells us that whales evolved from land dwelling mammals, known as mesonychids. These carnivorous animals have a wolf-like appearance. The fossil record shows a progression from mesonychids to the otter-like Pakicetus, to a walking whale, Amubulocetus, to progressively more whale-like creatures. All of these animals have certain unique bones in common, morphological evidence that they are related. So, does this tell us that whales are related to wolves, or were the mesonychids and Pakicetus, just wolf-like in appearance; an example of convergent evolution? We will use DNA evidence to help us to answer these evolutionary questions.
    [Show full text]
  • Hadrosaurs As Ungulate Parallels: Lost Lifestyles and Deficient Data
    Hadrosaurs as ungulate parallels: Lost lifestyles and deficient data MATTHEW T. CARRANO, CHRISTINE M. JANIS, and J. JOHN SEPKOSKI,JR.? Carrano, M.T, Janis, C.M., & Sepkoski, J.J., Jr. 1999. Hadrosaurs as ungulate parallels: Lost Lifestyles and deficient data. -Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 44,3,237-261. Hadrosaur dinosaurs (Ornithischia: Hadrosauridae) were abundant in Late Cretaceous terrestrial environments of North America and Asia. Their derived dental and postcranial specializations for herbivory have led to the suggestion that these dinosaurs were analo- gous to modem ungulates in lifestyle. Ungulates display a suite of morphological fea- tures that are correlated with diet, habitat preference, and sexual dimorphism. In this pa- per we examine several of these same features in hadrosaurs in order to determine whether they display similar patterns under multivariate analysis. Initial results confirm the resemblances between hadrosaurs and ungulates but suggest that missing data may considerably affect the outcomes of statistical analyses. Using the hadrosaur dataset as a template, we artificially degrade the (previously complete) ungulate datasets and per- form the same analyses. Results are consistent with earlier results and provide an oppor- tunity to assess the impact of missing data on the original multivariate structure. Our re- sults support the hypothesis that hadrosaurs were similar to ungulates in patterns of ecomorphology. Key words : Dinosauria, Ornithischia, Ornithopoda, multivariate statistics, paleoeco- logy, Marnmalia, NMDS. Matthew T. Carrano [[email protected]],Department of Anatomical Sci- ences, Health Sciences Center T-8, State University of New York at Stony Brook, Stony Brook, New York, 11 794 USA. Christine M. Janis [[email protected]], Department of Ecology and Evolution- ary Biology, Division of Biology and Medicine, Box G-B209, Brown University, Provi- dence, Rhode Island, 02912 USA.
    [Show full text]
  • Evolution and Development of Cetacean Appendages Across the Cetartiodactylan Land-To-Sea Transition
    EVOLUTION AND DEVELOPMENT OF CETACEAN APPENDAGES A dissertation submitted to Kent State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy by Lisa Noelle Cooper December, 2009 Dissertation written by Lisa Noelle Cooper B.S., Montana State University, 1999 M.S., San Diego State University, 2004 Ph.D., Kent State University, 2009 Approved by _____________________________________, Chair, Doctoral Dissertation Committee J.G.M. Thewissen _____________________________________, Members, Doctoral Dissertation Committee Walter E. Horton, Jr. _____________________________________, Christopher Vinyard _____________________________________, Jeff Wenstrup Accepted by _____________________________________, Director, School of Biomedical Sciences Robert V. Dorman _____________________________________, Dean, College of Arts and Sciences Timothy Moerland ii TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES ........................................................................................................................... v LIST OF TABLELS ......................................................................................................................... vii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .............................................................................................................. viii Chapters Page I INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................ 1 The Eocene Raoellid Indohyus ........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Action Plan for the Reintroduction of Mouse Deer
    Action Plan for the Reintroduction of Indian Mouse Deer 2018 PREAMBLE Reintroductions of native fauna are a rare practice globally and rarer still in India where it has only been attempted twice in recent times, for the red panda and the pygmy hog. After the resounding success of the mouse deer conservation-breeding program at Nehru Zoological Park, Hyderabad, the idea of reintroducing mouse deer in to the wild was mooted. Several rounds of meetings later, it was decided to go ahead with the plan. After due deliberation, when an area inside Amrabad Tiger Reserve, Telangana, was designated as the site for release and preparations were being made to draw the specifics, since there was no precedent available to follow, the need for a scientific protocol document that would serve as a guide was strongly felt. Therefore, this document serves as the first ever action plan for mouse deer reintroduction by soft-release. It provides an outline of the goals, objectives and the methodology that needs to be adopted to make the plan scientifically rigorous and accountable. This plan has been prepared in accordance with IUCN’s Guidelines for Reintroductions and Other Conservation Translocations (version 1.0). It encourages all stakeholders of Indian wildlife conservation to use this document to plan reintroductions. It urges other forest departments to come forward and consider repopulating their depleted forests with the enigmatic Indian spotted chevrotain. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This document is the result of a cooperative effort by several people with a common desire to rewild degraded forests. They have directly or indirectly contributed to its compilation and brought the program to realization.
    [Show full text]
  • Spatial Differences in Prey Preference by Tigers Across the Bangladesh Sundarbans Reveal a Need for Customised Strategies to Protect Prey Populations
    Vol. 43: 65–74, 2020 ENDANGERED SPECIES RESEARCH Published September 17 https://doi.org/10.3354/esr01052 Endang Species Res OPEN ACCESS Spatial differences in prey preference by tigers across the Bangladesh Sundarbans reveal a need for customised strategies to protect prey populations M. Abdul Aziz1,3,*, M. Anwarul Islam2, Jim Groombridge1 1Durrell Institute of Conservation and Ecology, School of Anthropology and Conservation, University of Kent, Canterbury CT2 7NZ, UK 2Department of Zoology, University of Dhaka, Dhaka 1000, Bangladesh 3Present address: Department of Zoology, Jahangirnagar University, Savar, Dhaka 1342, Bangladesh ABSTRACT: The Sundarbans is the only mangrove habitat in the world to support tigers Panthera tigris, whose persistence there is believed to be dependent on a very limited number of prey spe- cies. Conservation managers therefore need to understand how tigers utilise available prey spe- cies on a spatial scale in order to formulate a prey-based protection strategy for this global-priority tiger landscape. A total of 512 scat samples were collected during a survey of 1984 km2 of forest across 4 sample blocks in the 6017 km2 of the Bangladesh Sundarbans. Analysis of scat composi- tion and prey remains reliably identified 5 major prey species, of which spotted deer Axis axis and wild pig Sus scrofa contributed a cumulative biomass of 89% to tiger diet. Tiger preference for prey species was highly skewed towards spotted deer and wild pig, but the relative contribution of these 2 species differed significantly across the 4 study areas, which spanned the Sundarbans, demonstrating important spatial patterns of tiger prey preference across the Sundarbans land- scape.
    [Show full text]