DOCSLIB.ORG

Speke's Gazelle

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Speke's Gazelle Cervid (Deer) TAG Chair- Michelle Hatwood Vet advisor- Tracy Clippinger, DVM Curator-Audubon Species Survival Center (FMASSC) [email protected] [email protected] w. 504.398.3153 Research & Reproduction advisor- c. 352.281.0394 Buddha Pukazhenthi Smithsonian's Conservation Biology Institute Vice Chair- Stephen Castillo [email protected] Curator- Disney's Animal Kingdom [email protected] Nutrition advisor- Jaap Wensvoort w. 407.938.2335 Toronto Zoo [email protected] Education advisors- Brian Ogle [email protected] Population Management- Kevin Willis Minnesota Zoological Garden [email protected] Cervid (Deer) TAG Chair- Michelle Hatwood Curator-Audubon Species Survival Center (FMASSC) Steering Committee [email protected] w. 504.398.3153 Tony Fisher- Minnesota Zoo c. 352.281.0394 Robin Noll- Los Angeles Zoo Vice Chair- Stephen Castillo Buddha Pukazhenthi- SCBI Curator- Disney's Animal Kingdom [email protected] Andrea DeMuth- Brookgreen Gardens w. 407.938.2335 Allison Case- Northwest Trek Wildlife Terry Lincoln- Dakota Zoo Randy Rieches- San Diego Zoo Safari Park Dan Beetem- The Wilds Scott Stainback- Caldwell Zoo Current Programs YELLOW PROGRAMS RED PROGRAMS ▪ Tufted Deer Moose ▪ Eld’s Deer- Priority Species! Mexican Red Brocket Deer ▪ Barasingha White-lipped Deer ▪ Pere David’s Deer Chilean Pudu Greater Malayan Chevrotain CANDIDATE PROGRAMS Calamian Deer Bactrian Wapiti Siberian Musk Deer- Priority Species! Reeves’ Muntjac Barbary Stag aka- Brow-antlered Deer, Thamin 2016 Priority Species 2016 22.41 (63) in 6 institutions 2018 25.43 (68) in 4 institutions Endangered – wild population ↓ Do you have a big deer species in your collection? Program Leader ▪ Dolores Reed-SSP and Studbook keeper On-going research on in vitro fertilization ▪ Smithsonian Conservation Biology Institute and embryo transfer in Eld’s deer ▪ [email protected] ▪ PIs Pierre Comizzoli (Smithsonian ▪ 540-635-6524 Conservation Biology Institute) ▪ Boripat Siriaroonrat (Zoological Park Organization, Thailand) 2016 Priority Species 2016 10.5 (15) in 4 institutions 2018 9.4 (13) in 4 institutions (soon to be 5) Vulnerable – wild population ↓ Does not fall under CWD regulations in most states ©Brent Huffman, www.ultimateungulate.com Program Leader Northern climate Zoos needed for future ▪ Matt Ardaiolo ▪ Denver Zoo Does anyone know any private holders ▪ [email protected] of Musk Deer? ▪ (720) 337 - 1669 What you can you do? Know your Chronic Wasting Disease State import regulations Talk to your State vet about CWD regulations for exotics Monitor current cervid collection animals for CWD Add Deer to your collection plan!! Publications Studbooks Buck Up (pub. 2014) Barasingha 2018 An Educator's Guide to Cervids Malayan chevrotain 2017 Eld’s Deer 2017 Moose 2017 SSP Breeding & Transfer Plans Moose 2018 Publications Regional Collection Plan (RCP) Last updated 2014 Next RCP due 2019! Program Leaders New in 2017 Mexican Red Brocket Deer Program Leader Meg Tedeschi Bergen County Zoo [email protected] 201.634.3118 In situ Conservation Palawan Deer Research and Conservation Program- funding needed Balabac Mouse Deer Tragulus nigricans (IUCN: Endangered) Calamian Deer Axis calamianensis (IUCN: Endangered) In situ Conservation Large antlered muntjac Muntiacus vuquangensis (IUCN: Critically Endangered) Location: Vietnam, Laos Contact: Andrew Tilker Funding and support Needed!! In situ Conservation Location: Cambodia Contact: Tom Gray Eld’s Deer Funding and support needed Rucervus eldii (IUCN: Endangered) Indochinese hog deer Axis porcinus (IUCN: Endangered) Photo by Brent Huffman Research Eld’s Deer Rucervus eldii (IUCN: Endangered) Location: Smithsonian's Conservation Biology Institute Researcher: PIs Pierre Comizzoli Contact: Buddha Pukazhenthi, [email protected] Details: On-going research on in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer in Eld’s deer Location: Zoological Park Organization, Thailand Researcher: Boripat Siriaroonrat Contact: Buddha Pukazhenthi, [email protected] Details: On-going research on in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer in captive Eld’s deer Research New TAG supported projects 1. Protecting deer from chronic wasting disease Researcher: Dr. Alfred Roca, Ph.D. a genetic researcher at the University of Illinois. Summary: (this description is a general overview, this project is based on findings that are not yet published, so some of the hypothesis details are still confidential). Dr. Roca is examining the prion gene in various species of deer, most are zoo species, to determine susceptibility and resistance to CWD within species and between species. Needs from TAG: Written support to aid in grant applications. Possible blood samples in the future gathered during normal exams, but no requests right now. 2. Chronic Wasting Disease Live Animal Test Development Researcher: Dr. Frank Bastian, MD at Louisiana State University. Dr. Bastian has a long history of working with neurological issues in humans and animals. Summary: Dr. Bastian is working on a way to test for CWD in live animals. Currently CWD diagnostics are done postmortem. This may also be a first step in designing a vaccine. Needs from TAG: Written support to aid in grant applications. Consulting aid for exotic captive species. Funding support would be great too. 2018 Goals Add CWD information Regional to website, including state regulations, to aid Collection Plan! zoos in collection planning Due 2019! Follow-up on CWD research More collaborative work with EAZA.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Review of the Distribution, Status and Conservation of Musk Deer in China
    Folia Zool. – 53(2): 129–140 (2004) Review of the distribution, status and conservation of musk deer in China Yijun ZHOU1, Xiuxiang MENG1,2∗, Jinchao FENG1, Qisen YANG2, Zuojian FENG2, Lin XIA2 and Luděk BARTOŠ3 1 School of Life and Environment Sciences, Central University for Nationalities, 27 Zhongguancun Nan-da-jie, Beijing 100081, China; e-mail:[email protected] 2 Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 19 Zhongguancun Road, Beijing 100080, China 3 Ethology Group, Research Institute of Animal Production, P.O.Box 1, 104 01 Praha 10, Czech Republic; e-mail: [email protected] Received 30 December 2003; Accepted 8 June 2004 A b s t r a c t . There are five species of musk deer of the genus Moschus, in China, occurring in about 17 provinces. We estimate the total numbers in China to be between 220,000 and 320,000. In some areas the populations are in decline, and some are close to extinction due to over-hunting and habitat loss or degradation, the former being the primary threat to musk deer populations. To conserve musk deer, in situ protection should be improved, and the present unsustainable forest exploitation in the range areas should be halted. Poaching of musk deer, and smuggling of musk deer products, should be prevented. Domestic use of musk should be restricted. In some areas where musk deer have become extinct or are critically endangered, ex situ protection should be introduced. Musk deer farming should be revised and developed according to biological requirements. Key words: musk deer, Moschus, conservation status, China Introduction Musk deer Moschus spp.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessement of Biodiversity and NTFP Status in BCI Project Areas
    APPENDIX 4 Assessment of Biodiversity Values in BCI project Areas Part I. Introduction of BCI project area and its biodiversity status 1.1. Physical characteristics BCI area is situated in the Priority Central Annamite Landscape ( Landscape CA1)( or Central Truong Son Landscape), it is a geomorphological entity within the Greater Truong Son Global 200 Ecoregion of the FLMEC of Greater Annamite Ecoregion in Global 200 of WWF . were provisionally delineated at the Ecoregion-based Conservation in the Forests of the Mekong Biological Assessment Workshop, held inPhnom Penh in March 2000. And Landcape CA1 will be introduced as follows: Priority Landscape CA1 is. The priority landscape encompasses the central section of the main Annamite chain, together with associated foothills to the west and east (Map 1). The boundaries of Priority Landscape CA1 were delineated according to geomorphological criteria in preference to biogeographical criteria for a number of reasons. Firstly, while the ranges of a number of taxa broadly define the priority landscape, there is insufficient congruence in their known distributions for the boundaries to be precisely delineated. Secondly, there is insufficient information available about the known distribution and habitat requirements of taxa that might be used to delineate the priority landscape. Thirdly, the concept of a geomorphologically delineated landscape is more meaningful to decision makers and donors. Finally, a geomorphologically delineated landscape is not constrained by anthropogenic changes in habitat condition and extent, and, therefore, presents a vision for the future and an objective for habitat restoration efforts. The area referred to as the Greater Truong Son in this document was considered by Vidal (1960) to comprise parts of two distinct geomorphological units: the Annamite chain, stretching from Xieng Khoang province in Lao P.D.R.
    [Show full text]
  • Review of Asian Species/Country Combinations Subject to Long-Standing Import Suspensions
    Review of Asian species/country combinations subject to long-standing import suspensions (Version edited for public release) SRG 54 Prepared for the European Commission Directorate General Environment ENV.E.2. – Environmental Agreements and Trade by the United Nations Environment Programme World Conservation Monitoring Centre November, 2010 UNEP World Conservation Monitoring PREPARED FOR Centre 219 Huntingdon Road The European Commission, Brussels, Belgium Cambridge CB3 0DL DISCLAIMER United Kingdom Tel: +44 (0) 1223 277314 The contents of this report do not necessarily Fax: +44 (0) 1223 277136 reflect the views or policies of UNEP or Email: [email protected] Website: www.unep-wcmc.org contributory organisations. The designations employed and the presentations do not imply ABOUT UNEP-WORLD CONSERVATION the expressions of any opinion whatsoever on MONITORING CENTRE the part of UNEP, the European Commission or contributory organisations concerning the The UNEP World Conservation Monitoring legal status of any country, territory, city or Centre (UNEP-WCMC), based in Cambridge, area or its authority, or concerning the UK, is the specialist biodiversity information delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. and assessment centre of the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), run cooperatively with WCMC, a UK charity. The © Copyright: 2010, European Commission Centre's mission is to evaluate and highlight the many values of biodiversity and put authoritative biodiversity knowledge at the centre of decision-making. Through the analysis and synthesis of global biodiversity knowledge the Centre provides authoritative, strategic and timely information for conventions, countries and organisations to use in the development and implementation of their policies and decisions. The UNEP-WCMC provides objective and scientifically rigorous procedures and services.
    [Show full text]
  • Facts and Figures
    FACTS AND FIGURES OVERVIEW The Columbus Zoo and Aquarium is home to more than 11,000 animals representing nearly 600 species from around the globe. The Zoo complex is a recreational and education destination that includes the 22-acre Zoombezi Bay water park and the 18-hole Safari Golf Club. The Columbus Zoo and Aquarium also operates the Wilds, a 10,000-acre conservation center and safari park located in southeastern Ohio. The Zoo is a regional attraction with global impact, annually contributing $4 million of privately raised funds to support conservation projects worldwide. A 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization, the Columbus Zoo has earned Charity Navigator’s prestigious 4-star rating. MISSION Lead and inspire by connecting people and wildlife. VISION The sustainable co-existence of all living things. SIZE The Zoo complex spans 588 acres, more than 200 of which have been developed as animal habitats and public spaces. The Zoo habitats are organized into six geographic regions: Asia Quest, Australia and the Islands, Congo Expedition, Heart of Africa, North America and Polar Frontier, and Shores. The newest region, Heart of Africa, is designed as a mixed species savanna spanning 23 acres. ATTENDANCE The Zoo serves as one of central Ohio’s most popular family attractions and hosts more than two million visitors annually. The Zoo experienced a record-breaking attendance in 2014 with 2.47 million visitors (not including the attendance for Zoombezi Bay, Safari Golf or the Wilds). ADMISSION AND MEMBERSHIP RATES In consideration of the Franklin County taxpayers who provide support for the Zoo, a non-profit organization, the Zoo offers these residents special admission prices and membership rates, weekly promotions, and educational programs for free or a reduced price.
    [Show full text]
  • Hippotragus Equinus – Roan Antelope
    Hippotragus equinus – Roan Antelope authorities as there may be no significant genetic differences between the two. Many of the Roan Antelope in South Africa are H. e. cottoni or equinus x cottoni (especially on private properties). Assessment Rationale This charismatic antelope exists at low density within the assessment region, occurring in savannah woodlands and grasslands. Currently (2013–2014), there are an observed 333 individuals (210–233 mature) existing on nine formally protected areas within the natural distribution range. Adding privately protected subpopulations and an Cliff & Suretha Dorse estimated 0.8–5% of individuals on wildlife ranches that may be considered wild and free-roaming, yields a total mature population of 218–294 individuals. Most private Regional Red List status (2016) Endangered subpopulations are intensively bred and/or kept in camps C2a(i)+D*†‡ to exclude predators and to facilitate healthcare. Field National Red List status (2004) Vulnerable D1 surveys are required to identify potentially eligible subpopulations that can be included in this assessment. Reasons for change Non-genuine: While there was an historical crash in Kruger National Park New information (KNP) of 90% between 1986 and 1993, the subpopulation Global Red List status (2008) Least Concern has since stabilised at c. 50 individuals. Overall, over the past three generations (1990–2015), based on available TOPS listing (NEMBA) Vulnerable data for nine formally protected areas, there has been a CITES listing None net population reduction of c. 23%, which indicates an ongoing decline but not as severe as the historical Endemic Edge of Range reduction. Further long-term data are needed to more *Watch-list Data †Watch-list Threat ‡Conservation Dependent accurately estimate the national population trend.
    [Show full text]
  • Connochaetes Gnou – Black Wildebeest
    Connochaetes gnou – Black Wildebeest Blue Wildebeest (C. taurinus) (Grobler et al. 2005 and ongoing work at the University of the Free State and the National Zoological Gardens), which is most likely due to the historic bottlenecks experienced by C. gnou in the late 1800s. The evolution of a distinct southern endemic Black Wildebeest in the Pleistocene was associated with, and possibly driven by, a shift towards a more specialised kind of territorial breeding behaviour, which can only function in open habitat. Thus, the evolution of the Black Wildebeest was directly associated with the emergence of Highveld-type open grasslands in the central interior of South Africa (Ackermann et al. 2010). Andre Botha Assessment Rationale Regional Red List status (2016) Least Concern*† This is an endemic species occurring in open grasslands in the central interior of the assessment region. There are National Red List status (2004) Least Concern at least an estimated 16,260 individuals (counts Reasons for change No change conducted between 2012 and 2015) on protected areas across the Free State, Gauteng, North West, Northern Global Red List status (2008) Least Concern Cape, Eastern Cape, Mpumalanga and KwaZulu-Natal TOPS listing (NEMBA) (2007) Protected (KZN) provinces (mostly within the natural distribution range). This yields a total mature population size of 9,765– CITES listing None 11,382 (using a 60–70% mature population structure). This Endemic Yes is an underestimate as there are many more subpopulations on wildlife ranches for which comprehensive data are *Watch-list Threat †Conservation Dependent unavailable. Most subpopulations in protected areas are stable or increasing.
    [Show full text]
  • Whole-Genome Sequencing of Wild Siberian Musk
    Yi et al. BMC Genomics (2020) 21:108 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-020-6495-2 RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access Whole-genome sequencing of wild Siberian musk deer (Moschus moschiferus) provides insights into its genetic features Li Yi1†, Menggen Dalai2*†, Rina Su1†, Weili Lin3, Myagmarsuren Erdenedalai4, Batkhuu Luvsantseren4, Chimedragchaa Chimedtseren4*, Zhen Wang3* and Surong Hasi1* Abstract Background: Siberian musk deer, one of the seven species, is distributed in coniferous forests of Asia. Worldwide, the population size of Siberian musk deer is threatened by severe illegal poaching for commercially valuable musk and meat, habitat losses, and forest fire. At present, this species is categorized as Vulnerable on the IUCN Red List. However, the genetic information of Siberian musk deer is largely unexplored. Results: Here, we produced 3.10 Gb draft assembly of wild Siberian musk deer with a contig N50 of 29,145 bp and a scaffold N50 of 7,955,248 bp. We annotated 19,363 protein-coding genes and estimated 44.44% of the genome to be repetitive. Our phylogenetic analysis reveals that wild Siberian musk deer is closer to Bovidae than to Cervidae. Comparative analyses showed that the genetic features of Siberian musk deer adapted in cold and high-altitude environments. We sequenced two additional genomes of Siberian musk deer constructed demographic history indicated that changes in effective population size corresponded with recent glacial epochs. Finally, we identified several candidate genes that may play a role in the musk secretion based on transcriptome analysis. Conclusions: Here, we present a high-quality draft genome of wild Siberian musk deer, which will provide a valuable genetic resource for further investigations of this economically important musk deer.
    [Show full text]
  • Performing Animals in Chinese Zoos August 2010
    Performing Animals in Chinese Zoos August 2010 Compiled by David Neale, Animal Welfare Director Lisa Yang, Animal Welfare Officer 1. Methodology From September 2009 to August 2010, Animals Asia investigators visited 13 safari parks and zoos across China to document wild animal performances. The information and photographs obtained from this investigation are summarised below. Video footage taken during the investigations has been used to produce a short film entitled „The Performance‟ available via the Animals Asia website www.animalsasia.org 2. Executive Summary Wild animal performances are common at captive animal establishments across China. All thirteen establishments visited in 2009/10 put on performances of one kind or another with many drawing in large crowds. Asiatic Black Bears are the most popular performance animal, present at 90% of parks; 75% of parks exhibit performing monkeys; 75% of parks exhibit performing tigers; 50% of parks exhibit performing sea-lion; Five parks put on bird performances; four parks exhibit performing elephants and two parks have a dedicated dolphinarium for marine mammal performances. During the wild animal performances animals are forced through fear, intimidation and in some cases physical force to perform unnatural tricks. 75% of parks force bears to ride bicycles; 50% of parks force bears to perform acrobatics on acrobatic rings; three parks force bears to ride a motorbike over a high wire 30ft above the ground; two parks force bears to „box‟ with each other; one park exhibits a human wrestling with a bear; 75% of parks force monkeys to ride bicycles; 50% force monkeys to perform handstands on the horns of goats, often while the goat is balancing on a tightrope some 10ft above the ground; the most common tiger acts force tigers to walk on their back legs, jump through hoops of fire and walk on top of large balls; Elephants were seen at four parks performing uncomfortable and humiliating tricks such as standing on their heads, and spinning on one leg.
    [Show full text]
  • Safari Park Food Policy
    Safari Park Food Policy Widespread and sparsest Paolo westernized insatiately and encrypts his stalag staunchly and nuttily. Simular IsDru Vic omen aureate or gauffer or laic someafter power cornstone Stefano elusively, uppercut however so pestiferously? low-pressure Wynton peculiarized duty-free or chortled. What are treated to weigh the lines and african safari park, we do have gone digital map online and safari park vs zoo, as the solicitation of park, jack and service Nature Play Pavilion during your inner WILD visit! Pets into all abilities are high bushes so fortunate to safari park food policy? Our goat and know you are prohibited from for north carolina zoo is a thrilling experience is here and safari park food policy, to feed our daily admission? Can be permitted, can always wash or safari park food policy enactment is where you about two hours. Operating hours are subject matter change clothes to inclement weather. This policy and safari park food policy and food provided that. Our hours of operations vary on Thanksgiving and Christmas. Zoo renovations and construction. Where were the nearest town? Most have minimum age limits. Is as they require a safari park food policy: from any person with proper trash in life, regardless of their service dog, entertainment can reach afternoon. You the fort worth of our ticket booth upon the main entrance and wait in your pet to safari park food policy enactment is one exception of. The Safari Park to many restaurants and food kiosks, but park fare can stretch a bit pricey. Can weed smoke in addition zoo? Amazon River Quest simulates the experience always a boat expedition down Amazon River where visitors can gift the various animals in naturalistic habitats.
    [Show full text]
  • MALE GENITAL ORGANS and ACCESSORY GLANDS of the LESSER MOUSE DEER, TRAGULUS Fa VAN/CUS
    MALE GENITAL ORGANS AND ACCESSORY GLANDS OF THE LESSER MOUSE DEER, TRAGULUS fA VAN/CUS M. K. VIDYADARAN, R. S. K. SHARMA, S. SUMITA, I. ZULKIFLI, AND A. RAZEEM-MAZLAN Faculty of Biomedical and Health Science, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400 UPM Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia (MKV), Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Sciences, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400 UPM Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia (RSKS, SS, /Z), Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/jmammal/article/80/1/199/844673 by guest on 01 October 2021 Department of Wildlife and National Parks, Zoo Melaka, 75450 Melaka, Malaysia (ARM) Gross anatomical features of the male genital organs and accessory genital glands of the lesser mouse deer (Tragulus javanicus) are described. The long fibroelastic penis lacks a prominent glans and is coiled at its free end to form two and one-half turns. Near the tight coils of the penis, on the right ventrolateral aspect, lies a V-shaped ventral process. The scrotum is prominent, unpigmented, and devoid of hair and is attached close to the body, high in the perineal region. The ovoid, obliquely oriented testes carry a large cauda and caput epididymis. Accessory genital glands consist of paired, lobulated, club-shaped vesic­ ular glands, and a pair of ovoid bulbourethral glands. A well-defined prostate gland was not observed on the surface of the pelvic urethra. Many features of the male genital organs of T. javanicus are pleisomorphic, being retained from suiod ancestors of the Artiodactyla. Key words: Tragulus javanicus, male genital organs, accessory genital glands, reproduc­ tion, anatomy, Malaysia The lesser mouse deer (Tragulus javan­ gulidae, and Bovidae (Webb and Taylor, icus), although a ruminant, possesses cer­ 1980).
    [Show full text]
  • Animals of Africa
    Silver 49 Bronze 26 Gold 59 Copper 17 Animals of Africa _______________________________________________Diamond 80 PYGMY ANTELOPES Klipspringer Common oribi Haggard oribi Gold 59 Bronze 26 Silver 49 Copper 17 Bronze 26 Silver 49 Gold 61 Copper 17 Diamond 80 Diamond 80 Steenbok 1 234 5 _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ Cape grysbok BIG CATS LECHWE, KOB, PUKU Sharpe grysbok African lion 1 2 2 2 Common lechwe Livingstone suni African leopard***** Kafue Flats lechwe East African suni African cheetah***** _______________________________________________ Red lechwe Royal antelope SMALL CATS & AFRICAN CIVET Black lechwe Bates pygmy antelope Serval Nile lechwe 1 1 2 2 4 _______________________________________________ Caracal 2 White-eared kob DIK-DIKS African wild cat Uganda kob Salt dik-dik African golden cat CentralAfrican kob Harar dik-dik 1 2 2 African civet _______________________________________________ Western kob (Buffon) Guenther dik-dik HYENAS Puku Kirk dik-dik Spotted hyena 1 1 1 _______________________________________________ Damara dik-dik REEDBUCKS & RHEBOK Brown hyena Phillips dik-dik Common reedbuck _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________African striped hyena Eastern bohor reedbuck BUSH DUIKERS THICK-SKINNED GAME Abyssinian bohor reedbuck Southern bush duiker _______________________________________________African elephant 1 1 1 Sudan bohor reedbuck Angolan bush duiker (closed) 1 122 2 Black rhinoceros** *** Nigerian
    [Show full text]
  • Sexual Selection and Extinction in Deer Saloume Bazyan
    Sexual selection and extinction in deer Saloume Bazyan Degree project in biology, Master of science (2 years), 2013 Examensarbete i biologi 30 hp till masterexamen, 2013 Biology Education Centre and Ecology and Genetics, Uppsala University Supervisor: Jacob Höglund External opponent: Masahito Tsuboi Content Abstract..............................................................................................................................................II Introduction..........................................................................................................................................1 Sexual selection........................................................................................................................1 − Male-male competition...................................................................................................2 − Female choice.................................................................................................................2 − Sexual conflict.................................................................................................................3 Secondary sexual trait and mating system. .............................................................................3 Intensity of sexual selection......................................................................................................5 Goal and scope.....................................................................................................................................6 Methods................................................................................................................................................8
    [Show full text]