Evolution and Development of Cetacean Appendages Across the Cetartiodactylan Land-To-Sea Transition

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Evolution and Development of Cetacean Appendages Across the Cetartiodactylan Land-To-Sea Transition EVOLUTION AND DEVELOPMENT OF CETACEAN APPENDAGES A dissertation submitted to Kent State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy by Lisa Noelle Cooper December, 2009 Dissertation written by Lisa Noelle Cooper B.S., Montana State University, 1999 M.S., San Diego State University, 2004 Ph.D., Kent State University, 2009 Approved by _____________________________________, Chair, Doctoral Dissertation Committee J.G.M. Thewissen _____________________________________, Members, Doctoral Dissertation Committee Walter E. Horton, Jr. _____________________________________, Christopher Vinyard _____________________________________, Jeff Wenstrup Accepted by _____________________________________, Director, School of Biomedical Sciences Robert V. Dorman _____________________________________, Dean, College of Arts and Sciences Timothy Moerland ii TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES ........................................................................................................................... v LIST OF TABLELS ......................................................................................................................... vii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .............................................................................................................. viii Chapters Page I INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................ 1 The Eocene Raoellid Indohyus ......................................................................................... 2 Cortical Bone Evolution in Cetartiodactylans .................................................................. 5 The Apical Ectodermal Ridge .......................................................................................... 6 Hyperphalangy ................................................................................................................. 8 The Soft Tissue Flipper ..................................................................................................... 9 II MORPHOLOGY AND LOCOMOTION OF THE MIDDLE EOCENE RAOELLID INDOHYUS (ARTIODACTYLA: MAMMALIA) .................................................................... 11 Introduction ................................................................................................................... 11 Materials and Methods .................................................................................................. 15 Results ............................................................................................................................ 16 Discussion ...................................................................................................................... 47 III EVOLUTION OF BONE MICROSTRUCTURE DURING THE AQUATIC INVASION OF CETARTIODACTYLA (MAMMALIA) ........................................................... 63 Introduction ................................................................................................................... 63 Materials and Methods .................................................................................................. 69 Results ............................................................................................................................ 77 Discussion ...................................................................................................................... 88 IV EVOLUTION OF THE APICAL ECTODERM IN THE DEVELOPING VERTEBRATE LIMB ....... 95 Introduction ................................................................................................................... 95 Materials and Methods ................................................................................................ 105 Results .......................................................................................................................... 106 Discussion .................................................................................................................... 114 iii TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued) CHAPTER Page V DEVELOPMENT OF DOLPHIN FLIPPERS: MOLECULAR EVOLUTION OF HYPERPHALANGY AND INTERDIGITAL WEBBING ........................................................ 119 Abstract ........................................................................................................................ 119 Introduction ................................................................................................................. 120 Materials and Methods ................................................................................................ 123 Results .......................................................................................................................... 124 Discussion .................................................................................................................... 130 VI REVIEW OF THE EVOLUTION AND DEVELOPMENT OF CETACEAN APPENDAGES ....... 135 Developmental Processes ............................................................................................ 135 Form and Function ...................................................................................................... 138 Performance ................................................................................................................ 144 Environment ................................................................................................................ 146 Biological Role ............................................................................................................. 147 REFERENCES .............................................................................................................................. 148 APPENDIX: CATALOGUE OF INDOHYUS POSTCRANIAL ELEMENTS FROM THE A. RANGA RAO COLLECTION USED IN THIS ANALYSIS ............................................................ 181 iv LIST OF FIGURES Figure Page 1 Reconstruction of Indohyus ............................................................................................. 3 2 A block of sediment showing several disarticulated bones of Indohyus ......................... 4 3 Hyperphalangy in modern cetaceans .............................................................................. 8 4 Skeletal reconstruction of Indohyus .............................................................................. 13 5 Ribs and vertebrae of Indohyus ..................................................................................... 17 6 Vertebrae of Indohyus ................................................................................................... 22 7 Forelimb elements of Indohyus ..................................................................................... 26 8 The manus and pes of Indohyus .................................................................................... 31 9 Pelvic limb elements of Indohyus .................................................................................. 36 10 Tarsal elements of Indohyus .......................................................................................... 42 11 Phalangeal cross-sections in Indohyus, pakicetids, and Ambulocetus natans............... 56 12 Bone cross-sectional geometries in Indohyus compared to terrestrial artiodactyls with an equivalent body size (Tragulus and Hyemoschus) ....................... 59 13 Mathematial model that calculates amount of bone as a function of the distance to the center of the bone ................................................................................ 75 14 Radiographs through long bone midshafts of cetartiodactylans .................................. 78 15 Radiographs through long bone midshafts of fossil cetaceans from the archaeocete Family Remingtonocetidae ....................................................................... 79 16 Double logarithmic plots of P (a measure of bone thickness) ....................................... 81 17 Phylogenetic tree showing an ancestral character state reconstruction by squaredchange parsimony in fossil and extant cetartiodactylans ............................ 84 v LIST OF FIGURES (Continued) Figure Page 18 A graphical summary of P-values calculated in this analysis ......................................... 86 19 Schematics of apical ectodermal (AE) morphologies .................................................... 98 20 Morphology of an approximately 110 day old (Carnegie Stage 23) pantropical spotted dolphin (Stenella attenuata, LACM 94285) ................................. 103 21 Schematic of the transition from an apical ectodermal ridge (AE-1) to a finfold in the killifish (Aphyosemion scheeli, modified from Wood, 1982) ............................. 107 22 Apical ectodermal morphologies associated protein signals in the forelimbs of dolphins ................................................................................................................... 111 23 Forelimb development in embryos of the dolphin Stenella attenuate ....................... 121 24 Fibroblast growth factor (Fgf) protein signals in the developing forelimb of Stenella embryos and a fetus. ................................................................................. 125 25 Wingless type 9a (Wnt-9a) protein signals in the developing forelimb of Stenella embryos ......................................................................................................... 126 26 Gremlin and bone morphogenic protein (Bmp) signals in the developing forelimb of Stenella embryos
Recommended publications
  • The Wingtips of the Pterosaurs: Anatomy, Aeronautical Function and Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology Xxx (2015) Xxx Xxx 3 Ecological Implications
    Our reference: PALAEO 7445 P-authorquery-v11 AUTHOR QUERY FORM Journal: PALAEO Please e-mail your responses and any corrections to: Article Number: 7445 E-mail: [email protected] Dear Author, Please check your proof carefully and mark all corrections at the appropriate place in the proof (e.g., by using on-screen annotation in the PDF file) or compile them in a separate list. Note: if you opt to annotate the file with software other than Adobe Reader then please also highlight the appropriate place in the PDF file. To ensure fast publication of your paper please return your corrections within 48 hours. For correction or revision of any artwork, please consult http://www.elsevier.com/artworkinstructions. We were unable to process your file(s) fully electronically and have proceeded by Scanning (parts of) your Rekeying (parts of) your article Scanning the article artwork Any queries or remarks that have arisen during the processing of your manuscript are listed below and highlighted by flags in the proof. Click on the ‘Q’ link to go to the location in the proof. Location in article Query / Remark: click on the Q link to go Please insert your reply or correction at the corresponding line in the proof Q1 Your article is registered as a regular item and is being processed for inclusion in a regular issue of the journal. If this is NOT correct and your article belongs to a Special Issue/Collection please contact [email protected] immediately prior to returning your corrections. Q2 Please confirm that given names and surnames have been identified correctly.
    [Show full text]
  • JVP 26(3) September 2006—ABSTRACTS
    Neoceti Symposium, Saturday 8:45 acid-prepared osteolepiforms Medoevia and Gogonasus has offered strong support for BODY SIZE AND CRYPTIC TROPHIC SEPARATION OF GENERALIZED Jarvik’s interpretation, but Eusthenopteron itself has not been reexamined in detail. PIERCE-FEEDING CETACEANS: THE ROLE OF FEEDING DIVERSITY DUR- Uncertainty has persisted about the relationship between the large endoskeletal “fenestra ING THE RISE OF THE NEOCETI endochoanalis” and the apparently much smaller choana, and about the occlusion of upper ADAM, Peter, Univ. of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; JETT, Kristin, Univ. of and lower jaw fangs relative to the choana. California, Davis, Davis, CA; OLSON, Joshua, Univ. of California, Los Angeles, Los A CT scan investigation of a large skull of Eusthenopteron, carried out in collaboration Angeles, CA with University of Texas and Parc de Miguasha, offers an opportunity to image and digital- Marine mammals with homodont dentition and relatively little specialization of the feeding ly “dissect” a complete three-dimensional snout region. We find that a choana is indeed apparatus are often categorized as generalist eaters of squid and fish. However, analyses of present, somewhat narrower but otherwise similar to that described by Jarvik. It does not many modern ecosystems reveal the importance of body size in determining trophic parti- receive the anterior coronoid fang, which bites mesial to the edge of the dermopalatine and tioning and diversity among predators. We established relationships between body sizes of is received by a pit in that bone. The fenestra endochoanalis is partly floored by the vomer extant cetaceans and their prey in order to infer prey size and potential trophic separation of and the dermopalatine, restricting the choana to the lateral part of the fenestra.
    [Show full text]
  • Fish Locomotion: Recent Advances and New Directions
    MA07CH22-Lauder ARI 6 November 2014 13:40 Fish Locomotion: Recent Advances and New Directions George V. Lauder Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138; email: [email protected] Annu. Rev. Mar. Sci. 2015. 7:521–45 Keywords First published online as a Review in Advance on swimming, kinematics, hydrodynamics, robotics September 19, 2014 The Annual Review of Marine Science is online at Abstract marine.annualreviews.org Access provided by Harvard University on 01/07/15. For personal use only. Research on fish locomotion has expanded greatly in recent years as new This article’s doi: approaches have been brought to bear on a classical field of study. Detailed Annu. Rev. Marine. Sci. 2015.7:521-545. Downloaded from www.annualreviews.org 10.1146/annurev-marine-010814-015614 analyses of patterns of body and fin motion and the effects of these move- Copyright c 2015 by Annual Reviews. ments on water flow patterns have helped scientists understand the causes All rights reserved and effects of hydrodynamic patterns produced by swimming fish. Recent developments include the study of the center-of-mass motion of swimming fish and the use of volumetric imaging systems that allow three-dimensional instantaneous snapshots of wake flow patterns. The large numbers of swim- ming fish in the oceans and the vorticity present in fin and body wakes sup- port the hypothesis that fish contribute significantly to the mixing of ocean waters. New developments in fish robotics have enhanced understanding of the physical principles underlying aquatic propulsion and allowed intriguing biological features, such as the structure of shark skin, to be studied in detail.
    [Show full text]
  • New Postcranial Specimens of the Anthracotheriidae (Mammalia; Artiodactyla) from the Paleogene of Fayum Depression, Egypt
    International Journal of Scientific Engineering and Applied Science (IJSEAS) - Volume-1, Issue-8,November 2015 ISSN: 2395-3470 www.ijseas.com New postcranial specimens of the Anthracotheriidae (Mammalia; Artiodactyla) from the Paleogene of Fayum Depression, Egypt 1 2 Afifi H. Sileem , Abdel Galil A Hewaidy 1 Vertebrate paleontology section, Cairo Geological Museum, Cairo, Egypt, [email protected] 2Department of Geology, Faculty of Science, Al-Azhar University, Egypt, <[email protected]> Abstract: The fossiliferous deposits exposed north of Birket Qarun in the Fayum Depression, northeast Egypt, have produced a remarkable collection of fossil mammals from localities that range in age from earliest late Eocene (~37 Ma) to latest early Oligocene (~29 Ma). Anthracotheriidae are among the most common mammals that are preserved in these deposits. Here we describe a new fossil specimens of the Anthracotheriidae (Mammalia, Artiodactyla) discovered in the Jebel Qatrani Formation of Fayum. The specimens consist of a seven astragalus, which is referable to Bothriogenys sp. from the formation. The specimens Bothriogenys sp. show a higher degree of size variation and some feature suggest that the anthracothere are not closely related to Hippopotamus. Key word: anthracothere, Bothriogenys; astragalus; Fayum; Early Oligocene. 376 International Journal of Scientific Engineering and Applied Science (IJSEAS) - Volume-1, Issue-8,November 2015 ISSN: 2395-3470 www.ijseas.com Introduction: The fossiliferous sedimentary deposits exposed north of Birket (lake) Qarun in the Fayum Depression (Fig.1), northeast Egypt, have produced a remarkable collection of a wide variety of fish, amphibian, reptile, bird and mammal taxa (e.g. Andrews, 1906; Simons and Rasmussen, 1990; Murray et al.
    [Show full text]
  • The World at the Time of Messel: Conference Volume
    T. Lehmann & S.F.K. Schaal (eds) The World at the Time of Messel - Conference Volume Time at the The World The World at the Time of Messel: Puzzles in Palaeobiology, Palaeoenvironment and the History of Early Primates 22nd International Senckenberg Conference 2011 Frankfurt am Main, 15th - 19th November 2011 ISBN 978-3-929907-86-5 Conference Volume SENCKENBERG Gesellschaft für Naturforschung THOMAS LEHMANN & STEPHAN F.K. SCHAAL (eds) The World at the Time of Messel: Puzzles in Palaeobiology, Palaeoenvironment, and the History of Early Primates 22nd International Senckenberg Conference Frankfurt am Main, 15th – 19th November 2011 Conference Volume Senckenberg Gesellschaft für Naturforschung IMPRINT The World at the Time of Messel: Puzzles in Palaeobiology, Palaeoenvironment, and the History of Early Primates 22nd International Senckenberg Conference 15th – 19th November 2011, Frankfurt am Main, Germany Conference Volume Publisher PROF. DR. DR. H.C. VOLKER MOSBRUGGER Senckenberg Gesellschaft für Naturforschung Senckenberganlage 25, 60325 Frankfurt am Main, Germany Editors DR. THOMAS LEHMANN & DR. STEPHAN F.K. SCHAAL Senckenberg Research Institute and Natural History Museum Frankfurt Senckenberganlage 25, 60325 Frankfurt am Main, Germany [email protected]; [email protected] Language editors JOSEPH E.B. HOGAN & DR. KRISTER T. SMITH Layout JULIANE EBERHARDT & ANIKA VOGEL Cover Illustration EVELINE JUNQUEIRA Print Rhein-Main-Geschäftsdrucke, Hofheim-Wallau, Germany Citation LEHMANN, T. & SCHAAL, S.F.K. (eds) (2011). The World at the Time of Messel: Puzzles in Palaeobiology, Palaeoenvironment, and the History of Early Primates. 22nd International Senckenberg Conference. 15th – 19th November 2011, Frankfurt am Main. Conference Volume. Senckenberg Gesellschaft für Naturforschung, Frankfurt am Main. pp. 203.
    [Show full text]
  • Artiodactyla and Perissodactyla (Mammalia) from the Early-Middle Eocene Kuldana Formation of Kohat (Pakistan)
    CO"uTK1BL 11015 FKOLI IHt \lC5tLL1 OF I' ALEO\ IOLOG1 THE UNIVERSITY OF IVICHIGAN VOI 77 Lo 10 p 717-37.1 October 33 1987 ARTIODACTYLA AND PERISSODACTYLA (MAMMALIA) FROM THE EARLY-MIDDLE EOCENE KULDANA FORMATION OF KOHAT (PAKISTAN) BY J. G. M. THEWISSEN. P. D. GINGERICH and D. E. RUSSELL MUSEUM OF PALEONTOLOGY THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN ANN ARBOR CONTRIBUTIONS FROM THE MUSEUM OF PALEONTOLOGY Charles B. Beck, Director Jennifer A. Kitchell, Editor This series of contributions from the Museum of Paleontology is a medium for publication of papers based chiefly on collections in the Museum. When the number of pages issued is sufficient to make a volume, a title page and a table of contents will be sent to libraries on the mailing list, and to individuals upon request. A list of the separate issues may also be obtained by request. Correspond- ence should be directed to the Museum of Paleontology, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109. VOLS. II-XXVII. Parts of volumes may be obtained if available. Price lists are available upon inquiry. I ARTIODACTI L .-I A\D PERISSODACTYL4 (kl.iihlhlAL1A) FROM THE EARLY-h1IDDLE EOCEUE KCLD..I\4 FORMATIO\ OF KOHAT (PAKISTAY) J. G. M. THEWISSEN. P. D. GINGERICH AND D. E. RUSSELL Ah.strcict.-Chorlakki. yielding approximately 400 specimens (mostly isolated teeth and bone fragments). is one of four major early-to-middle Eocene niammal localities on the Indo-Pakistan subcontinent. On the basis of ung~~latesclescribed in this paper we consider the Chorlakki fauna to be younger than that from Barbora Banda.
    [Show full text]
  • Median Fin Patterning in Bony Fish: Caspase-3 Role in Fin Fold Reabsorption
    Eastern Illinois University The Keep Undergraduate Honors Theses Honors College 2017 Median Fin Patterning in Bony Fish: Caspase-3 Role in Fin Fold Reabsorption Kaitlyn Ann Hammock Follow this and additional works at: https://thekeep.eiu.edu/honors_theses Part of the Animal Sciences Commons Median fin patterning in bony fish: caspase-3 role in fin fold reabsorption BY Kaitlyn Ann Hammock UNDERGRADUATE THESIS Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirement for obtaining UNDERGRADUATE DEPARTMENTAL HONORS Department of Biological Sciences along with the HonorsCollege at EASTERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY Charleston, Illinois 2017 I hereby recommend this thesis to be accepted as fulfilling the thesis requirement for obtaining Undergraduate Departmental Honors Date '.fHESIS ADVI 1 Date HONORSCOORDmATOR f C I//' ' / ·12 1' J Date, , DEPARTME TCHAIR Abstract Fish larvae develop a fin fold that will later be replaced by the median fins. I hypothesize that finfold reabsorption is part of the initial patterning of the median fins,and that caspase-3, an apoptosis marker, will be expressed in the fin fold during reabsorption. I analyzed time series of larvae in the first20-days post hatch (dph) to determine timing of median findevelopment in a basal bony fish- sturgeon- and in zebrafish, a derived bony fish. I am expecting the general activation pathway to be conserved in both fishesbut, the timing and location of cell death to differ.The dorsal fin foldis the firstto be reabsorbed in the sturgeon starting at 2 dph and rays formed at 6dph. This was closely followed by the anal finat 3 dph, rays at 9 dph and only later, at 6dph, does the caudal fin start forming and rays at 14 dph.
    [Show full text]
  • A New Middle Eocene Protocetid Whale (Mammalia: Cetacea: Archaeoceti) and Associated Biota from Georgia Author(S): Richard C
    A New Middle Eocene Protocetid Whale (Mammalia: Cetacea: Archaeoceti) and Associated Biota from Georgia Author(s): Richard C. Hulbert, Jr., Richard M. Petkewich, Gale A. Bishop, David Bukry and David P. Aleshire Source: Journal of Paleontology , Sep., 1998, Vol. 72, No. 5 (Sep., 1998), pp. 907-927 Published by: Paleontological Society Stable URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/1306667 REFERENCES Linked references are available on JSTOR for this article: https://www.jstor.org/stable/1306667?seq=1&cid=pdf- reference#references_tab_contents You may need to log in to JSTOR to access the linked references. JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at https://about.jstor.org/terms SEPM Society for Sedimentary Geology and are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Journal of Paleontology This content downloaded from 131.204.154.192 on Thu, 08 Apr 2021 18:43:05 UTC All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms J. Paleont., 72(5), 1998, pp. 907-927 Copyright ? 1998, The Paleontological Society 0022-3360/98/0072-0907$03.00 A NEW MIDDLE EOCENE PROTOCETID WHALE (MAMMALIA: CETACEA: ARCHAEOCETI) AND ASSOCIATED BIOTA FROM GEORGIA RICHARD C. HULBERT, JR.,1 RICHARD M. PETKEWICH,"4 GALE A.
    [Show full text]
  • Thomas Jefferson Meg Tooth
    The ECPHORA The Newsletter of the Calvert Marine Museum Fossil Club Volume 30 Number 3 September 2015 Thomas Jefferson Meg Tooth Features Thomas Jefferson Meg The catalogue number Review; Walking is: ANSP 959 Whales Inside The tooth came from Ricehope Estate, Snaggletooth Shark Cooper River, Exhibit South Carolina. Tiktaalik Clavatulidae In 1806, it was Juvenile Bald Eagle originally collected or Sculpting Whale Shark owned by Dr. William Moroccan Fossils Reid. Prints in the Sahara Volunteer Outing to Miocene-Pliocene National Geographic coastal plain sediments. Dolphins in the Chesapeake Sloth Tooth Found SharkFest Shark Iconography in Pre-Columbian Panama Hippo Skulls CT- Scanned Squalus sp. Teeth Sperm Whale Teeth On a recent trip to the Academy of Natural Sciences of Drexel University (Philadelphia), Collections Manager Ned Gilmore gave John Nance and me a behind -the-scenes highlights tour. Among the fossils that belonged to Thomas☼ Jefferson (left; American Founding Father, principal author of the Declaration of Independence, and third President of the United States) was this Carcharocles megalodon tooth. Jefferson’s interests and knowledge were encyclopedic; a delight to know that they included paleontology. Hand by J. Nance. Photo by S. Godfrey. Jefferson portrait from: http://www.biography.com/people/thomas-jefferson-9353715 ☼ CALVERT MARINE MUSEUM www.calvertmarinemuseum.com 2 The Ecphora September 2015 Book Review: The Walking 41 million years ago and has worldwide distribution. It was fully aquatic, although it did have residual Whales hind limbs. In later chapters, Professor Thewissen George F. Klein discusses limb development and various genetic factors that make whales, whales. This is a The full title of this book is The Walking complicated topic, but I found these chapters very Whales — From Land to Water in Eight Million clear and readable.
    [Show full text]
  • Origin and Beyond
    EVOLUTION ORIGIN ANDBEYOND Gould, who alerted him to the fact the Galapagos finches ORIGIN AND BEYOND were distinct but closely related species. Darwin investigated ALFRED RUSSEL WALLACE (1823–1913) the breeding and artificial selection of domesticated animals, and learned about species, time, and the fossil record from despite the inspiration and wealth of data he had gathered during his years aboard the Alfred Russel Wallace was a school teacher and naturalist who gave up teaching the anatomist Richard Owen, who had worked on many of to earn his living as a professional collector of exotic plants and animals from beagle, darwin took many years to formulate his theory and ready it for publication – Darwin’s vertebrate specimens and, in 1842, had “invented” the tropics. He collected extensively in South America, and from 1854 in the so long, in fact, that he was almost beaten to publication. nevertheless, when it dinosaurs as a separate category of reptiles. islands of the Malay archipelago. From these experiences, Wallace realized By 1842, Darwin’s evolutionary ideas were sufficiently emerged, darwin’s work had a profound effect. that species exist in variant advanced for him to produce a 35-page sketch and, by forms and that changes in 1844, a 250-page synthesis, a copy of which he sent in 1847 the environment could lead During a long life, Charles After his five-year round the world voyage, Darwin arrived Darwin saw himself largely as a geologist, and published to the botanist, Joseph Dalton Hooker. This trusted friend to the loss of any ill-adapted Darwin wrote numerous back at the family home in Shrewsbury on 5 October 1836.
    [Show full text]
  • The Relationship Between Gene Network Structure and Expression Variation Among Individuals and Species
    UC San Diego UC San Diego Previously Published Works Title The Relationship between Gene Network Structure and Expression Variation among Individuals and Species. Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/77v6f7dc Journal PLoS genetics, 11(8) ISSN 1553-7390 Authors Sears, Karen E Maier, Jennifer A Rivas-Astroza, Marcelo et al. Publication Date 2015-08-28 DOI 10.1371/journal.pgen.1005398 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California RESEARCH ARTICLE The Relationship between Gene Network Structure and Expression Variation among Individuals and Species Karen E. Sears1,2*, Jennifer A. Maier1, Marcelo Rivas-Astroza3, Rachel Poe4, Sheng Zhong3, Kari Kosog1, Jonathan D. Marcot1, Richard R. Behringer5, Chris J. Cretekos6†, John J. Rasweiler, IV7, Zoi Rapti4 1 School of Integrative Biology, University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois, United States of America, 2 Institute for Genomic Biology, University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois, United States of America, 3 Department of Bioengineering, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States of America, 4 Department of Mathematics, University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois, United States of America, 5 Department of Genetics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States of America, 6 Department of Biological Sciences, Idaho State University, Pocatello, Idaho, United States of America, 7 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, State University of New York Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn, New York, United States of America † Deceased. * [email protected] OPEN ACCESS Citation: Sears KE, Maier JA, Rivas-Astroza M, Poe R, Zhong S, Kosog K, et al. (2015) The Relationship between Gene Network Structure and Expression Abstract Variation among Individuals and Species.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluating the Ecology of Spinosaurus: Shoreline Generalist Or Aquatic Pursuit Specialist?
    Palaeontologia Electronica palaeo-electronica.org Evaluating the ecology of Spinosaurus: Shoreline generalist or aquatic pursuit specialist? David W.E. Hone and Thomas R. Holtz, Jr. ABSTRACT The giant theropod Spinosaurus was an unusual animal and highly derived in many ways, and interpretations of its ecology remain controversial. Recent papers have added considerable knowledge of the anatomy of the genus with the discovery of a new and much more complete specimen, but this has also brought new and dramatic interpretations of its ecology as a highly specialised semi-aquatic animal that actively pursued aquatic prey. Here we assess the arguments about the functional morphology of this animal and the available data on its ecology and possible habits in the light of these new finds. We conclude that based on the available data, the degree of adapta- tions for aquatic life are questionable, other interpretations for the tail fin and other fea- tures are supported (e.g., socio-sexual signalling), and the pursuit predation hypothesis for Spinosaurus as a “highly specialized aquatic predator” is not supported. In contrast, a ‘wading’ model for an animal that predominantly fished from shorelines or within shallow waters is not contradicted by any line of evidence and is well supported. Spinosaurus almost certainly fed primarily from the water and may have swum, but there is no evidence that it was a specialised aquatic pursuit predator. David W.E. Hone. Queen Mary University of London, Mile End Road, London, E1 4NS, UK. [email protected] Thomas R. Holtz, Jr. Department of Geology, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742 USA and Department of Paleobiology, National Museum of Natural History, Washington, DC 20560 USA.
    [Show full text]