Combined Appendices

Appendix 1. Summary of responses to Pre-

Submission Draft

January 2019

Little Eaton Neighbourhood Plan – Draft Plan Consultation Comments and Analysis – January 2019

Summary and Analysis of comments on the Draft Neighbourhood Plan - January 2019

ANALYSIS OF COMMENTS No. Policy/Section Respondent Summary of Comments Response Amendment (where relevant) to Plan General Plan well conceived, well structured No and reasoned, based on extensive Derbyshire These positive comments about community consultation and CC the Plan are welcomed. engagement and appropriately 1 evidenced where necessary. The Environment Agency notes that No the neighbourhood plan does not appear to allocate any residential sites, however it does mention two development areas within the draft Environment plan, one at Mill Green, and the General comments noted. Agency other known as ‘South Site’. As it does not explicitly mention that these are allocated sites then we will not provide detailed responses 2 on these as a whole. We currently have no specific No comments to make however, please keep us informed as your plans Severn Trent develop and when appropriate we Noted. Water will be able to offer a more detailed response. We’re specifically interested in any large-scale 3 development in the parish such as

Little Eaton Neighbourhood Plan – Draft Plan Consultation Comments and Analysis – January 2019

the potential at “South site” as its been badged. I’ve noted the named constraints of developing this site along with the general local objection, I guess its one to keep an eye on moving forward should it begin to progress. Natural England does not have any No specific comments on this draft neighbourhood plan. However, we refer you to the attached annex which covers the issues and Natural opportunities that should be Noted. England considered when preparing a Neighbourhood Plan. See https://www.gov.uk/guidance/pre- submission-screening-service- advice-on-planning-proposals- 4 affecting-protected-species. ...would you be able to explain how No this plan affects us as a business, and also help me understand some of the points of the plan, the Steering Group (DH) met to Resident expectations of the village for us as explain Plan a business within the community and what we can do to help in the 5 implementation. Regulator of Thank you for your email, however Social the regulator does not require these Noted. No 6 Housing communications. I can confirm we have received your No Western message and will ensure it will be Power Noted. forwarded to the relevant Distribution 7 department today.

Little Eaton Neighbourhood Plan – Draft Plan Consultation Comments and Analysis – January 2019

Trowell My Parish Council wishes you every No Parish success with your Neighbourhood Noted. 8 Council Plan. Leicestershir Leicestershire County Council have No e County no comments regarding your Noted’ 9 Council proposals at this time. I have included this item on the No Sandiacre Agenda for Councillors to consider Parish Noted. at their meeting of 6/11/18. NOTE: Council 10 no further reply received. Breadsall Parish Council wrote to No Breadsall congratulate Little Eaton on the Pre- Parish submission Draft and commented Noted. Council that it was a very good plan very 11 well put together. No Resident Positive comments The general support is welcomed. 12 Erewash Requested printed copy of the Pre- Voluntary Copy sent. No submission Draft. 13 Action The area covered by your No Neighbourhood Plan encompasses Eaton Barton (i), Little Barton (ii) Conservation Areas. Also Derwent Valley Mills World heritage site and Noted (but Little Barton and Eaton buffer zone, and includes a number Barton are not in Little Eaton). It is Historic of important designated heritage considered that the Plan contains England assets including 15 GII listed policies that safeguard these Buildings. In line with national assets. planning policy, it will be important that the strategy for this area safeguards those elements which contribute to the significance of 14 these assets so that they can be

Little Eaton Neighbourhood Plan – Draft Plan Consultation Comments and Analysis – January 2019

enjoyed by future generations of the area.

In relation to the Little Eaton No Neighbourhood Plan, our principal interest is in safeguarding the A38 which routes through the Plan area Highways and the A52 which routes 2 miles Noted. England south… due to the small scale of development growth, it is considered that there will be no impacts upon the operation of the 15 A38 and A52. Introductory Sections

Derbyshire Agreed to amend the text Refer to “Five Ways to Wellbeing”. Yes CC accordingly. 16

Derbyshire Refer to dementia friendly Agreed to amend the text Yes CC communities. accordingly. 17 Chapter 6. The Built Environment The findings from the consultation Refer to existing housing stock and Derbyshire and analysis of statistics do not Introduction need to renovate and replace poor No CC suggest that this issue of special quality housing. 18 importance to Little Eaton. The general approach to housing This is welcomed. provision is well reasoned and, given the fact that most of the parish POLICY BE1: is covered by Green Belt, Derbyshire HOUSING appropriately concludes that small No CC PROVISION windfall sites within the existing settlement confines of Little Eaton proves the most likely source of land 19 for housing.

Little Eaton Neighbourhood Plan – Draft Plan Consultation Comments and Analysis – January 2019

The general approach to housing This is welcomed. provision is well reasoned and, given the fact that most of the parish POLICY BE1: is covered by Green Belt, Derbyshire HOUSING appropriately concludes that small No CC PROVISION windfall sites within the existing settlement confines of Little Eaton proves the most likely source of land 20 for housing. It is welcomed and supported that This support is welcomed. POLICY BE1: the Plan seeks to identify potential Derbyshire HOUSING sites for new housing on brownfield No CC PROVISION sites, particularly a site as Mill 21 Green. It is disappointing that the Plan does The allocation of the Mill Green not seek to go further and identify site was considered by the the site as a proposed allocation for Steering Group. It determined that housing. it would not do this. This reflects that it is considered it is better and more appropriate to leave POLICY BE1: decisions regarding future housing Derbyshire HOUSING allocation to the Local Plan. No CC PROVISION Further, there are constraints, e.g. flooding with the site that may that may preclude all of its allocation for housing development. The approach taken has been the subject of discussions with the 22 Erewash BC, who support it. I think the land to the south of the This is noted. If the proposal is for No Resident and village between the old canal and a small ‘windfall’ housing and Chair of POLICY BE1: the railway line would be a good site associated development, any Derbyshire HOUSING for a small housing development, application would need to be Historic PROVISION expansion of the business trading considered within the planning Buildings estate (with a limit on the size of framework set by the Trust & 23 units) and a wildlife area/park Neighbourhood Plan and the

Little Eaton Neighbourhood Plan – Draft Plan Consultation Comments and Analysis – January 2019

Derwent roughly in equal proportion ie Local Plan. The Plan does not Valley Trust third/third/third. preclude such windfall’ development though does seek to control this form of development. POLICY BE1: It is not considered appropriate to No HOUSING restrict housing development to PROVISION infill development within the built- up area (as defined by the Green Belt) as this would prevent other forms of windfall development such as conversions and suitable Development of any kind should be small housing developments. "infill" only within the Settlement Further, it would be likely to be Boundaries of the village. This will Resident challenged by the Borough preserve the nature of the village. Council and others as would not This statement appears in many be in accordance with national and adopted NP. local planning policies. We understand that some NPs have introduced policies that focus on infill development only. These are special cases. They have met their housing requirement or do 24 not have one. POLICY BE1: It is not considered appropriate for No HOUSING the Plan to specifically identify the PROVISION brownfield sites that would accommodate the 30/40 houses. Where are the brownfield sites that It is considered that there are would accommodate 30/40 opportunities for the re-use of houses? If they are outside the Resident previously used land or buildings Settlement Boundary then they for residential and other forms of would be opposed by the villagers development. There have been see questionnaire examples of such development in recent years, and more is expected. The Plan does 25 highlight the Mill Green site, all or

Little Eaton Neighbourhood Plan – Draft Plan Consultation Comments and Analysis – January 2019

most of which, has been previously used or built upon and therefore may constitute a brownfield site. The point you make about if they are outside the Settlement Boundary then they would be opposed by the villagers is noted and recognised. POLICY BE1: It is agreed that housing Yes Erewash only need 5 houses to be HOUSING developments in recent years built in the village, this is now PROVISION have made a significant Resident properly reduced due to at least 5 contribution to meeting this overall being recently built in the last 12 target. It is agreed that this issue months. 26 could be amplified in the Plan. POLICY BE1: The policy approach to restricting No HOUSING Derbyshire development to within the This support is welcomed. PROVISION CC settlement confines of Little Eaton is 27 fully supported. POLICY BE1: Sites for new housing. Not clear This figure was provided by Yes Derbyshire HOUSING where figure of 30-40 comes from. Erewash BC. It is agreed that this CC 28 PROVISION Clarify. could be made clearer. POLICY BE1: This is recognised in the Plan. No HOUSING However, the Plan notes the need Mill Green site could accommodate PROVISION to preserve some of the existing Derbyshire much of the 30-40 houses and buildings and proposes to reserve CC proposes that the site be used for part of the site as a Green Space housing and a new village centre, for later development as a village 29 green. The Plan is explicit that the No location of the site in the Green Belt acts as a major constraint on POLICY BE1: Derbyshire Para 6.10 should state clearly that its development. The Plan is not HOUSING CC South Site unsuitable for housing. seeking a change in its current PROVISION Green Belt status. It is not considered appropriate to state that the site is unsuitable for

Little Eaton Neighbourhood Plan – Draft Plan Consultation Comments and Analysis – January 2019

housing, as there may be scope for infill housing that current green belt rules would allow in principle. No Specific POLICY BE2: Comments HOUSING MIX 30 Received Reference to Next Generation POLICY BE3: Derbyshire Access broadband infrastructure Yes Agreed. Text amended. GOOD DESIGN CC and gigabit-capable connections in 31 new developments. Derbyshire CC proposes policies on “Guide to Neighbourhood Planning Yes and Air Quality” including health Agreed. The introductory text to be POLICY BE3: Derbyshire issues that could be addressed, amended to refer to this GOOD DESIGN CC renewable energy; vehicle charging document. points; developers to provide cycle storage and links to local or key 32 cycle networks. POLICY BE3: State that developments of over 100 It is not considered this is No Derbyshire GOOD DESIGN should have Health Impact applicable. No such development CC 33 Assessment. proposed or considered likely. POLICY BE3: It is not considered this is No GOOD DESIGN applicable. This issue has not Derbyshire Refer to suitable heat sources for been highlighted as of special CC home. importance through the Plan 34 preparation process. POLICY BE3: GOOD DESIGN Derbyshire Should include reference to Dark Agreed. New policy and map Yes CC Skies Policy. added. 35 Flood Risk: We note that the draft The Plan is explicit that flood risk neighbourhood plan mentions that is of special importance to the Yes POLICY BE3: Environment there is preference for development Parish. The Plan supports and GOOD DESIGN Agency to be on brownfield sites, for encourages action aimed at example the site at Mill Green. As addressing this. It is not 36 already noted part of the site is in a considered to include a specific

Little Eaton Neighbourhood Plan – Draft Plan Consultation Comments and Analysis – January 2019

flood zone. Any development on a policy on this, as considered that it brownfield site that is situated within is adequately addressed in BE3. It a flood zone will need to ensure that is agreed to amend BE3 as you the development follows the suggest. Also, to make it more requirements of Policy 1: Climate explicit, the Plan supports district Change from the adopted Erewash wide and supported policies. Core Strategy ensuring . development does not increase flood risk to these sites and others, as well as the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF). We note that Policy BE3: Good Design part d) highlights that flood risk should not be increased upstream or downstream, it should also be added within this policy that flood risk shall not be increased for any proposed development site. The neighbourhood plan may wish to add its own flood risk policy to ensure development is either not sited in areas of flood risk, or if it is then is designed in such a manner to ensure the development is safe for its lifetime and does not increase flood risk to the site, or to others. If a separate policy is decided upon, this may negate the need for part d) in the Policy BE3: Good Design. POLICY BE4: No CHARACTER Omissions: The Clock House; Large Clock House and Poplars already BUILDINGS Chair of House behind Wall on Station listed. Others not built before AND FLEC Road; Lantern Cottage 257 Alfreton 1850 and not considered suitable. STRUCTURES Road; 255 - 265 Alfreton Road. 37 OF LOCAL

Little Eaton Neighbourhood Plan – Draft Plan Consultation Comments and Analysis – January 2019

HERITAGE INTEREST

POLICY BE4: Resident and No CHARACTER Chair of I would add ‘The Hatherings’ to the BUILDINGS Derbyshire list of buildings. It is older than AND Historic Hierons Wood (c 1904? And Hatherings" already listed. STRUCTURES Buildings designed in the Arts and Craft style OF LOCAL Trust & and still has most of its original HERITAGE Derwent features outside and inside. 38 INTEREST Valley Trust POLICY BE4: Yes CHARACTER BUILDINGS Are there two Anchor Inns on Agreed to correct mistakes in the AND Resident Alfreton Road? see BE4 items 1 & draft in the Policy BE4 and STRUCTURES 25. Appendix 8. OF LOCAL HERITAGE 39 INTEREST POLICY BE4: Turning to the Society's specific CHARACTER area of interest, which, as you know, No BUILDINGS was discussed at our open meeting AND back in June the draft document STRUCTURES mentions all the important issues OF LOCAL which were raised then i.e. listed HERITAGE buildings, heritage buildings and INTEREST Chairman, special character areas. Hopefully The Society's general support for LELHS the Local History Society will the Plan is noted and welcomed. provide the support that might be needed to help the cause of Little Eaton. Please keep us informed as the document progresses through the various stages of it's journey and be assured that you will have 40 our full support.

Little Eaton Neighbourhood Plan – Draft Plan Consultation Comments and Analysis – January 2019

POLICY BE4: CHARACTER BUILDINGS Proposal to include The Orchard (62 AND Resident Eaton Bank built by 1728) in the list It is already included in list. STRUCTURES No of historic buildings. OF LOCAL HERITAGE 41 INTEREST POLICY BE4: CHARACTER LE NP SG BUILDINGS (Chair): The list of buildings and structures Yes AND summary on in Policy BE4 has the Methodist Agreed to correct mistake in draft STRUCTURES Reading Church and Mill Green cottages OF LOCAL Room down twice. HERITAGE feedback 42 INTEREST POLICY BE4: Yes CHARACTER BUILDINGS AND Derbyshire Para 26 should say that Peckwash Agreed. Text amended STRUCTURES CC Mill is part of World Heritage Site. accordingly. OF LOCAL HERITAGE 43 INTEREST POLICY BE5: ALFRETON Strongly supports Policy BE5 on ROAD SPECIAL Resident This support is welcomed. No Alfreton Road Special Character . CHARACTER 44 AREA PROPOSAL No Specific BE6: TRAFFIC Comments MANAGEMENT Received POLICY BE7: No Specific DEVELOPER Comments

CONTRIBUTIO Received NS

Little Eaton Neighbourhood Plan – Draft Plan Consultation Comments and Analysis – January 2019

Chapter 7. Leisure and Facilities POLICY LF1: PROTECTION No Specific OF Comments COMMUNITY Received 45 FACILITIES This issue has not been identified as special importance to the Parish. It is considered that this POLICY LF2: policy is particularly applicable to ENHANCEMEN Derbyshire Restrict fast food outlets in vicinity of secondary schools. Little Eaton T OF No CC school. has a primary school, children are COMMUNITY not allowed to leave the premises FACILITIES of which outside of school hours. This restricts their ability to 46 purchase fast food. With regard to Mill Green the concern that part of it may be used for car parking is noted, but it is considered some flexibility, on potentially green, car parking spaces should be retained, Consultation shows that many POLICY LF3: Challenging the proposed car park Co-Chair LE residents would like to see any LITTLE EATON on Mill Green & asks about area in Bloom & development of the site contain No VILLAGE behind Queens Head for car FLEC some parking provision to cater for CENTRE parking. the needs of the development as well as the wider community. It is agreed that the area behind the area behind the Queens Head may be suitable for parking. It is beyond, however, the scope of the 47 Plan to require this. This concern is noted, but it is No POLICY LF3: Area but not part of Mill Green as Resident considered some flexibility, on LITTLE EATON car park. 48 potentially green, car parking

Little Eaton Neighbourhood Plan – Draft Plan Consultation Comments and Analysis – January 2019

VILLAGE spaces should be retained, CENTRE Consultation shows that many residents would like to see any development of the site contain some parking provision to cater for the needs of the development as well as the wider community. LE NP SG A lot of positive feedback, POLICY LF3: (Chair): particularly about the proposed No LITTLE EATON summary on village green and the Greenway. Noted. VILLAGE Reading Also about tidying up the village CENTRE Room centre. Main concern about traffic 49 feedback and parking. POLICY LF4: IMPROVED No Specific ACCESS FOR Comments PEOPLE OF Received LIMITED 50 MOBILITY Resident and Chair of I attach a scan of an additional POLICY LF5: Derbyshire potential route for the cycleway to No Agreed but this is best considered FOOTPATHS Historic connect the Ripley Greenway with at the detailed planning AND Buildings the Derwent Valley Cycleway going application stage. CYCLEWAYS Trust & north, as a ‘lowland’ route for those Derwent not on mountain bikes. 51 Valley Trust POLICY LF5: No FOOTPATHS Derbyshire Welcome encouragement and This general support is welcomed. AND CC facilitation of active travel. 52 CYCLEWAYS POLICY LF5: No Co-Chair LE FOOTPATHS in Bloom & Positive on Greenway. This support is welcomed. AND FLEC 53 CYCLEWAYS

Little Eaton Neighbourhood Plan – Draft Plan Consultation Comments and Analysis – January 2019

POLICY LF5: LE NP SG No FOOTPATHS (Chair): A lot of positive feedback, AND summary on particularly about the proposed This support is welcomed CYCLEWAYS Reading Greenway. Room 54 feedback No Specific POLICY LF6: Comments TOURISM Received Chapter 8: Natural Environment We welcome policy NE1: Yes Biodiversity which supports development proposals that will conserve, enhance and incorporate biodiversity. The Environment Agency would suggest that the following wording could be used to enhance the biodiversity condition. “Development proposals that conserve or enhance biodiversity, and incorporate biodiversity in and around them should be permitted. POLICY NE1: Environment Development proposals should Agreed. Policy NE1 amended BIODIVERSITY Agency promote preservation, restoration accordingly. and recreation of priority habitats, ecological networks and the protection and recovery of priority species populations where applicable. Development proposals that cannot avoid (through locating an alternative site with less harmful impacts), adequately mitigate, or, as a last resort, compensate for the loss of a locally or nationally identified site of biodiversity value 55 should be refused.”

Little Eaton Neighbourhood Plan – Draft Plan Consultation Comments and Analysis – January 2019

POLICY NE1: Proposals which protect and Yes BIODIVERSITY enhance biodiversity should be supported. This includes tree Agreed. Text amended to refer to Resident planting to reduce pollution from not the railway. only the A38 but the railway on the 56 west side of the village. POLICY NE1: The plan should include the It is agreed the Plan should Yes BIODIVERSITY preservation of valuable Grade 1, 2, include a statement seeking the Resident and 3a agricultural land. Again this preservation of valuable Grade 1, statement is included in many 2, and 3a agricultural land, as 57 adopted NP. suggested. PROPOSAL Co-Chair LE NE2: Positive on proposed barrier & tree in Bloom & This support is welcomed. No REDUCING planting re. A38. FLEC 58 POLLUTION PROPOSAL Mention opportunity of new flyover NE2: Derbyshire construction to provide noise and Agreed. Text amended. Yes REDUCING CC pollution screening from A38 59 POLLUTION These concerns are noted. They No Concerns about impact on privacy if POLICY NE3: are, however, beyond the scope of new Greenway implemented and BOTTLE Resident a Neighbourhood Plan to deal with possible bathing in Bottle Brook. BROOK and best be considered at any Recommendations given. 60 planning application stage. The Environment Agency welcomes Yes the proposals to have a buffer zone for the Bottle Brook. Generally the Environment Agency would request an 8m buffer zone from any main POLICY NE3: Environment river for biodiversity opportunities as BOTTLE Policy NE3 amended accordingly. Agency well as allowing access to the BROOK watercourse if and when required. Therefore the Environment Agency is happy to see a 10m buffer zone is proposed in Policy NE3: Bottle 61 Brook, apart from where existing

Little Eaton Neighbourhood Plan – Draft Plan Consultation Comments and Analysis – January 2019

built development restricts this to 3m. We would suggest an additional line stating ‘Any proposed development in the built up area (south of Jack O’Darley Bridge to just south of the Outrams Wharf Business Park), and where the development land is situated within 8m of the Bottle Brook, should look to restore an 8m buffer zone to the Bottle Brook, if reasonable and practical to do so’. POLICY NE3: Co-Chair LE No Positive on improving aesthetics on BOTTLE in Bloom & This support is welcomed. Bottle Brook 62 BROOK FLEC Supportive of Environmental No Initiatives and especially Nature POLICY NE4: Reserve along Old Derby Canal and WILDLIFE AND This support is noted and Resident proposes that some sections of the GREEN welcomed. flood defences on Bottle Brook CORRIDOR should be improved as per advice 63 from Derbyshire Wildlife Trust. POLICY NE4: No Co-Chair LE WILDLIFE AND Positive on Local Nature Reserve in Bloom & This support is welcomed. GREEN on S. Site. FLEC 64 CORRIDOR POLICY NE5: Yes Where is appendix X mentioned on It is agreed to amend the text to LOCAL GREEN Resident page 10 green spaces? address this typo. 65 SPACES POLICY NE5: Co-Chair LE LOCAL GREEN in Bloom & Positive on New Village Green.. This support is welcomed. No 66 SPACES FLEC No Specific POLICY NE7: Comments TREES 67 Received Chapter 9: Business

Little Eaton Neighbourhood Plan – Draft Plan Consultation Comments and Analysis – January 2019

POLICY B1: No specific PROTECT comments EMPLOYMENT received 68 USES There is some confusion about what Yes LE NP SG is to designated as “an employment (Chair): Agreed - we meant both sites and POLICY B2: area”. The text suggests it should summary on there should be map in the text to DUFFIELD cover both the Duffield Road and Reading explain that – also tidy up the ROAD SITE Outram’s Wharf sites: the policy’s Room policies. could be read as covering just the feedback 69 Duffield Road Site. POLICY B3: No specific OUTRAMS comments WHARF SITE received POLICY B4: No Supports Policy 9.10 OLD HALL MILL This support is noted and Resident enhancements of Old Hall Mill BUSINESS welcomed. Business Park 70 PARK

Little Eaton Neighbourhood Plan – Draft Plan Consultation Comments and Analysis – January 2019

Little Eaton Neighbourhood Plan Summary of Consultation and Engagement Activities

September 2018

1.Introduction

This document provides a summary of the consultation and engagement that took place in developing the Little Eaton Neighbourhood Plan.

The Little Eaton Neighbourhood Plan Steering Group was established under the auspices of Little Eaton Parish Council to oversee the development of the Plan. The group identified that strong and effective consultation was key to the successful development and implementation of the Neighbourhood Plan. In particular, the consultation aimed to:

• Inform as many local people, community groups and other relevant bodies and stakeholders as possible of the existence of the Neighbourhood Plan and its development and; • seek their views on the policies and proposals being developed by the Steering Group. 2. Timeline and Summary of Activities

Date Event or action Purpose/Outcome March 2017 Neighbourhood Plan A public meeting to discuss the merits of Introductory event developing a neighbourhood plan for Little Eaton.

June – July The Parish formally Following consultation, the Parish was 2017 applies to Erewash for designated by Erewash Borough Council as designation as a a Neighbourhood Plan Area on 5 July 2017 Neighbourhood Plan (see Area. https://www.erewash.gov.uk/neighbourhood- planning/little-eaton-neighbourhood- plan.html). August A web page, dedicated to The webpage provided background 2017???? Little Eaton information on the Plan, contact details and Neighbourhood Plan was how to get involved, and progress on the introduced. Plan. It can be found at https://www.littleeatonplan.co.uk/. September Little Eaton To raise awareness of the Plan, seek 2017 Neighbourhood Plan volunteers from the community to join the Launch. Steering Group and Theme Groups and discuss potential themes for the Plan. December Steering Group To drive the development of the Plan and 2017 established comprising ensure that it reflects local needs and parish councillors and priorities non-councillor members of the community . Jan 2018 Theme Group Kick Off To ‘kick off’ the Theme Groups, raise Meeting. awareness of the Plan and to help determine LITTLE EATON NEIGHBOURHOOD PLAN – SUMMARY OF CONSULTATION AND ENGAGEMENT JULY 2018

the key issues of local importance which the Theme Groups should focus on. Feb 2018 The first meetings of the To look at in detail each of the identified Theme Groups. themes (built environment, natural environment, leisure and facilities and business and employment) which the Theme Groups (and the Plan) should focus on. Jan 2018 Meeting took place with To raise awareness of the Plan and help representatives from the understand local businesses key concerns local business and potential opportunities and priorities for community. inclusion in the Plan, with a focus on the needs of local business and industry. Jan 2018 Local business A survey of local businesses was undertaken Questionnaire. to better understand their views on shaping the future development of Little Eaton. A summary of the findings can be found at https://www.littleeatonplan.co.uk/. April 2018 Community A household survey was undertaken to better Questionnaire understand resident’s views on shaping the future development of Little Eaton. A summary of the findings can be found at https://www.littleeatonplan.co.uk/. July 2018 Two community To raise awareness of the Plan and consult consultation drop-in with the community and community groups events/exhibitions as on the emerging proposals and receive. A part of the Little Eaton summary of the findings can be found at Carnival. https://www.littleeatonplan.co.uk/.

LITTLE EATON NEIGHBOURHOOD PLAN – SUMMARY OF CONSULTATION AND ENGAGEMENT JULY 2018

Little Eaton Neighbourhood Plan Little Eaton Community Questionnaire April 2018

Key Findings

June 2018

1.0 Introduction

1.1 Background The Little Eaton Neighbourhood Plan Steering Group conducted a survey of parishioners in April 2018 to support the development of its Neighbourhood Plan. Neighbourhood Plans represent a new planning mechanism which provides communities with the opportunity to shape the future of their locality. Obtaining views of the local community is key when preparing the Neighbourhood Plan. The questionnaire was aimed at: ▪ Understanding the character and needs of Little Eaton Parish (the parish) as a community. ▪ Understanding the concerns of the community in relation to future development. ▪ Understanding the key policy areas on which the Neighbourhood Plan should focus. This report outlines the key findings of the research.

1.2 Key Findings ▪ There is a strong appreciation for the area and in particular access to the countryside, the rural character and village atmosphere. ▪ Addressing speeding vehicles through the village, parking (especially associated with the Co-op), better bus services and facilities/ activities for older children were amongst the potential improvements that could be made to the parish. ▪ The majority of respondents (94%) believe that it is important for Little Eaton to remain a village. ▪ In terms of the scale of future development, residents generally favour smaller/individual homes (65%). ▪ There is a strong consensus (90%) for brownfield sites in the built-up area to be prioritised for future house building in lieu of greenfield sites within the built-up area or green belt. ▪ Respondents have a preference for small family homes (71%) and affordable starter homes (70%) in any future housing development. ▪ Community facilities are strongly valued and well utilised and in particular, the village shops, St Peter’s Park and the public footpaths. The majority of respondents are satisfied with the availability and sustainability of facilities in the parish. ▪ There is general community support for the proposal to enhance St Peter’s Park and Village Hall, and in particular improvements to the hall toilets and playground equipment. ▪ The community is generally supportive of future tourism/ leisure and creative Industries in the parish, unsupportive of offices and divided with regards to encouraging retail as a business activity. ▪ There is support for improvements to the village centre and in particular, enhancing the run-down and under-utilised sites and protecting current retail uses.

LITTLE EATON NEIGHBOURHOOD PLAN – SUMMARY OF RESULTS FROM COMMUNITY SURVEY APRIL 2018

2.0 Methodology A mixed methodological approach employing both a paper and online survey was utilised in order to collect a robust data sample. This approach offered flexibility to participants in terms of completion and a cost-effective solution to data collection. A questionnaire, approximately 8-10 minutes in length, was designed by the Steering Group. Paper copies of the questionnaire were distributed by the Steering Group directly to all households in the Parish. All residents of the Parish aged 16 years and over were encouraged to complete the questionnaire either as an individual or on behalf of their household. Completed questionnaires were returned to central collection points within the Parish. An online link to the questionnaire was hosted on the Little Eaton Neighbourhood website, where residents could also download additional copies to complete on an individual rather than household basis. The survey was promoted by the Steering Group, through posters in the community and online via the website. The hard copy and online surveys were launched together on the 17th April 2018 with the data collection period closing on the 30th April 2018.

3.0 Response and Analysis There was a good return rate, with 387 individuals/ households from a total population of 1,986 (16 years and above) and 1,015 households1 in the Parish completing questionnaires. The majority of people (72%) completed the questionnaire on behalf of their household than on an individual basis (28%).

The survey consisted of a mixture of ‘open’ and ‘closed’ questions. All printed survey responses were input to the online system (Survey Money) for data analysis. Data is presented graphically for most ‘closed’ questions along with a summary of the key findings. Open questions, including ‘comments’ have been summarised.

4.0 Results 4.1 Profile of respondents

4.1.1 Age

Table 1 shows the age breakdown of the questionnaire sample as compared to the 2011 Census data for the parish. As illustrated, the survey data is skewed slightly towards the older population (34% aged 65 and over compared to 19% in the census).

1 Based on 2011 Census. LITTLE EATON NEIGHBOURHOOD PLAN – SUMMARY OF RESULTS FROM COMMUNITY SURVEY APRIL 2018

Table 1: Age

Age Census % Number of Respondent % Responses 0 - 15 years 18% N/A N/A 16 - 17 years 3% 1 0% 18 – 24 years 6% 4 1% 25 - 44 years 21% 94 27% 45 – 64 years 32% 136 38% 65 or over 19% 122 34% Non-response - 30 - Total 100% 357 100%

Q1) What do you like about living in Little Eaton Parish? (please tick all that apply)

The main reason people like living in Little Eaton parish is the access to the countryside with nearly 93% of respondents selecting this option. However, the rural character of the village and the village atmosphere were very popular reasons with both options being selected by over 90% of those surveyed. Many of the other options provided also proved popular with only the built heritage and local employment opportunities attracting less than 50% of the responses. Some

LITTLE EATON NEIGHBOURHOOD PLAN – SUMMARY OF RESULTS FROM COMMUNITY SURVEY APRIL 2018 respondents also highlighted the local primary school and being in the catchment area for Ecclesbourne secondary school as being reasons why they like living in the village.

Q2) What could be improved or changed for the better in Little Eaton? Answered: 276 Skipped: 111

There were a wide variety of responses to this question with the main issues being based around cars speeding through the main road through the village (Alfreton Road) and parking throughout the village but particularly around the Co-op (also on Alfreton Road). Many people also highlighted the bus service, with many of those people being particularly unhappy about the lack of an evening bus service. Another response, which was common, was providing older children / teenagers / young adults with some sort of facilities or activities to do as many feel there is very little in the village catering to this demographic. Finally, some respondents felt that a restaurant would improve the village.

Q3) How important is it to you that Little Eaton remains a village, rather than becoming a suburb of Derby City?

The results from this question were extremely conclusive with almost 94% of respondents stating that it was very important to them that Little Eaton remained a village. Only 1 person surveyed placed no importance at all on this subject. Many of the additional comments that accompanied this question gave further evidence to show the importance of this issue with some common examples being that living in the village was the main reason why they moved to Little Eaton and that if it became a suburb, they would move away. Other examples noted that the atmosphere, community spirit and village identity would be lost if the village became a suburb.

LITTLE EATON NEIGHBOURHOOD PLAN – SUMMARY OF RESULTS FROM COMMUNITY SURVEY APRIL 2018

Q4) What size of housing developments do you think would be most appropriate in the parish? (please tick all that apply)

The most common response to this question was that both smaller developments and individual homes would be the most appropriate with about 65% of people selecting these options. Very few people (18% and 3%) thought that medium and large developments would be appropriate for the parish and several comments under the ‘other’ section called for no developments at all whilst some others believed that the disused and derelict sites in the village should be redeveloped.

Q5) Where do you think priorities in house building should be?

As seen in the graph and table above there was a lot of consensus in that people disagreed that house building should occur on greenfield sites. For greenfield sites in the built-up area, 70% disagreed (50% strongly) that this should be a priority for house building, whilst for greenfield LITTLE EATON NEIGHBOURHOOD PLAN – SUMMARY OF RESULTS FROM COMMUNITY SURVEY APRIL 2018 sites in the greenbelt this figure was 90% (80% strongly). There was, however, a general agreement that brownfield sites in the built-up area should be a priority for house building with nearly 90% agreeing with this statement (50% strongly). The results for brownfield sites in the greenbelt were very mixed with roughly 40% agreeing (11% strongly) that this should be a priority for house building but also roughly 45% disagreeing (28% strongly) with the statement.

Q6) What type of dwellings do you think are needed in the parish? (please tick all that apply)

The most commonly selected type of dwelling that people think is needed is small family homes with 71% of people selecting that option. Also popular was affordable starter homes with just

over 50% selecting this option. Retirement housing, detached houses and semi-detached houses also had some support with each being selected by about a third of respondents. Among the comments from those who selected ‘other’, there were many people reaffirming their point that

LITTLE EATON NEIGHBOURHOOD PLAN – SUMMARY OF RESULTS FROM COMMUNITY SURVEY APRIL 2018 there should be no additional housing as they did in question four. There were, however, quite a few responses that suggested that more bungalows were needed in the parish.

Q7) How important do you think each of the following is to the development of new homes?

In general, there was a lot of overall support for the statements outlined in the question. For

respecting the scale of the surrounding buildings,, 95% thought this was either important or very important with 70% of those believing it to be very important. Similar results were found for respecting the materials of the surrounding buildings (92% thought this was important with 60% feeling very important), reduces flood risk to new and current housing sites (94% important, 73% very important), off-road parking (90% important, 62% very important) and active management of the two conservation areas (88% important, 58% very important). The only statement, which did not have this level of support was in response to the one that housing should reflect the size

LITTLE EATON NEIGHBOURHOOD PLAN – SUMMARY OF RESULTS FROM COMMUNITY SURVEY APRIL 2018 of gardens of the surrounding properties. Although 59% of people believed this to be important (with this being split evenly between those who thought it was very important and those who just thought it to be important), there was a significant portion (27%) who thought this particular statement was neither important or important whilst about 10% thought it was of low importance (5% not at all important).

Q8) The Neighbourhood Plan enables us to identify additional historic buildings (not currently listed) for protection. Are there any historic buildings, structures or places which you believe are important to protect? e.g. Jack O’Darley Bridge, the village Pinfold. Answered: 199 Skipped: 188 Those surveyed identified many historical buildings, structures and places which residents believe are important to protect. Some of the more common examples of answers given by respondents include Jack O’Darley Bridge, the village Pinfold, Mill Green, Peckwash Mill, Bottle Brook, Elms Farm, Canal, The school, Parish Rooms, Clock House, the Old Railway Line ,The Queens Head pub and the old Blacksmiths shop. Several comments also stated that any/all historical sites should be protected, whilst some others suggested liaising with the Little Eaton Historical society to work out which sites should be protected.

Q9) Are there any parcels of land (that are not extensive tracts) that you think are important to the local community that might be considered as important Local Green Space E.g. Croft Corner Community Garden? (please provide details below) Answered: 190 Skipped: 197

Like with the previous question, respondents identified several areas which they believe should be considered as important Local Green Space. The most common responses were Croft Corner Community Garden, Bottle Brook, the Old Railway Line, St Peter’s Park, Village Green, Bluebell Woods and Mill Green. Other responses also included the triangle of land at the junction between Station Road and Duffield Road as well as Millennium Way.

Q10) What priorities should the Neighbourhood Plan have in protecting the natural environment?

LITTLE EATON NEIGHBOURHOOD PLAN – SUMMARY OF RESULTS FROM COMMUNITY SURVEY APRIL 2018

seen in the above graph and table there is a As

strong consensus of agreement across all the statements made in this question. Each statement has at least 85% of respondents agreeing or strongly agreeing with it with the vast majority of that being people who strongly agree. The statement about creating new habitats was the least well supported of all the statements, and even that had 85% of respondents in agreement with 53% being in strong agreement with the statement. The number of respondents who disagreed with any of the statements was negligible with that figure never reaching above 2% for the combined percentage of disagreement and strong disagreement. Several of the comments alongside this question mentioned that the green corridor, in particular, would be a good idea LITTLE EATON NEIGHBOURHOOD PLAN – SUMMARY OF RESULTS FROM COMMUNITY SURVEY APRIL 2018 and many suggested that the Old Railway line is used for this purpose or create a walkway along it.

Q11) How often do you use the following facilities in Little Eaton?

LITTLE EATON NEIGHBOURHOOD PLAN – SUMMARY OF RESULTS FROM COMMUNITY SURVEY APRIL 2018

The village shops, St

Peter’s Park and the public footpaths are the most often used facilities throughout the village with well over 50% of respondents using each of them every day or more than once a week. In contrast, the Playschool, Pre-school and Bowls club are least frequently used with over 90% of people saying they rarely or never use these facilities. Several facilities had high percentages of people using them either 2 or 3 times a month or once a month with the Pharmacy, Doctors Surgery, Post Office and Public Houses being the most prominent of these. The additional comments on this question outlined the hairdresser, garden centre, fish and chip shop and the school as other facilities people use. Other examples of comments included that whilst some people don’t use facilities such as the pre-school / playschool now they did use them when their children were younger and that these facilities are still of vital importance to the village.

LITTLE EATON NEIGHBOURHOOD PLAN – SUMMARY OF RESULTS FROM COMMUNITY SURVEY APRIL 2018

Q12) To what extent are you satisfied with the availability and sustainability of facilities in the parish?

The

majority of respondents were either satisfied or very satisfied (62% and 33% respectively) with the availability and sustainability of facilities in the parish. Only five respondents had some level of dissatisfaction (3 for dissatisfied and 2 for very dissatisfied) with the facilities in the parish.

Q13) Do you experience any difficulties with accessibility to any facilities or moving around the village more generally e.g. for disabled persons and baby buggies?

LITTLE EATON NEIGHBOURHOOD PLAN – SUMMARY OF RESULTS FROM COMMUNITY SURVEY APRIL 2018

Approximately two-thirds of respondents stated they had no issues with accessing facilities around the village, however, 20% did with the rest being unsure. The comments left with this question gave reasons as to why people found it difficult to access facilities. The main reason given was parking, particularly around the Co-op but also in other areas such as Barley Close. Many respondents also highlighted that narrow pavements are an issue particularly for those who have pushchairs, wheelchairs or mobility scooters.

Q14) Initial consultation has highlighted possible future enhancement of St Peters Park and the Village Hall to provide for wider use by the local community. How supportive are you of the following enhancements?

LITTLE EATON NEIGHBOURHOOD PLAN – SUMMARY OF RESULTS FROM COMMUNITY SURVEY APRIL 2018

All of the proposals attracted support from the respondents with over 50% saying they were supportive or very supportive of each proposal. The proposal concerning improving the village hall toilets attracted the highest level of support with 58% being very supportive and a further 32% being supportive. Improving the playground equipment also received much support with 47% being very supportive and 35% being supportive. The proposal about acquiring additional land to expand the park had the lowest level of support with only 52% being very supportive or supportive of this proposal. A further 18% were somewhat supportive, but 15% were not at all supportive of this idea.

Q15) Are there other improvements (not listed above) that you would like to see to St Peters Park, Village Hall or other community facility in the parish, including open space and public footpaths/bridleways? (please provide details) Answered: 160 Skipped: 227

The main area which was highlighted in this question was that respondents would like better maintenance of the public footpaths throughout the village. Several people also mentioned turning the old railway line into a public footpath as has been mentioned in previous questions. Other examples of comments included the provision of more dog waste bins and picnic benches.

Q16) Derbyshire County Council (DCC) and the Derwent Valley Trust (DVT) are seeking to promote the Derwent Valley as a key tourism destination. Our location offers the opportunity to promote Little Eaton as a “Gateway to the Derwent Valley” and its attractions. The DVT/ DCC are looking at several initiatives for the area including; Establishment of the Derwent Valley Cycleway, a traffic free multi-user route between Derby and Matlock, providing opportunities for leisure, tourism and commuting, Conversion of the old railway line through the centre of the village for walking and cycling (Greenway), Canoe Trail, Art Crawl (linking art studios in the Derwent Valley). Would you be in favour of the Neighbourhood Plan developing policies that support this idea? In particular:

LITTLE EATON NEIGHBOURHOOD PLAN – SUMMARY OF RESULTS FROM COMMUNITY SURVEY APRIL 2018

The most popular proposal was improvements to footpaths of which 58% of respondents were very supportive and a further 28% supportive, which also backs up what was said in question 15. Promoting the local heritage also gained much support with 43% being very supportive of this and a further 37% being supportive of this idea. The establishment of a small heritage centre, supporting creative workshop spaces, parking provision at key locations and provision of picnic benches were all supported quite well with approximately 55% of people being supportive or very supportive of these ideas. The proposal about holiday accommodation was the least well supported with only 35% being supportive or very supportive of this idea. A further 31% were somewhat supportive, but there was quite a bit of resistance to this idea with 24% being not at all supportive.

LITTLE EATON NEIGHBOURHOOD PLAN – SUMMARY OF RESULTS FROM COMMUNITY SURVEY APRIL 2018

Q17) Should the following types of business activity be encouraged in Little Eaton to promote jobs and economic activity?

Tourism / Leisure and Creative Industries were the two areas that had the most agreement with 64% and 63% either agreeing or strongly agreeing with these types of business respectively. The area of business which saw the highest level of disagreement from respondents was offices with 19% disagreeing and 7% strongly disagreeing with this area. Offices also saw the lowest level of agreement out of all the types of business in this question. Interestingly, retail, which gained the third highest percentage of people who agreed or strongly agreed with encouraging retail as a business activity in the village, also receives the second highest percentage of people opposing encouraging the business activity.

LITTLE EATON NEIGHBOURHOOD PLAN – SUMMARY OF RESULTS FROM COMMUNITY SURVEY APRIL 2018

Q18) How can the village centre be improved?

Most ideas given in this question received high levels of support. Other than improving the appearance of public areas and improving signage every proposal had over 70% of respondents either agreeing or strongly agreeing with it. Enhancing run-down and under-utilised sites and support the main village centre by protecting current retail uses received the highest support

LITTLE EATON NEIGHBOURHOOD PLAN – SUMMARY OF RESULTS FROM COMMUNITY SURVEY APRIL 2018 with over 90% agreeing or strongly agreeing with them. Improving signage was the least well supported with 45% agreeing or strongly agreeing with the proposal, but a large proportion of people (40%) neither agreed nor disagreed with this idea. The additional comments with the question contained many people re-emphasising that parking around the Co-op is a big issue whilst there was some disagreement among respondents about the types of traffic calming measures that could be used. Some people were in favour of speed bumps whilst there were also many who strongly opposed them.

Q19) If you have any further comments about the Neighbourhood Plan or if you wish to expand on any of your earlier comments then please do so below: Answered: 116 Skipped: 271

One of the most common comment on this question was that people like the village the way it is and don’t want to see too much change within the village. There were also many comments re-emphasising some of the main issues which occurred throughout the questionnaire such as parking around the Co-op and speeding along the main road in the village.

LITTLE EATON NEIGHBOURHOOD PLAN – SUMMARY OF RESULTS FROM COMMUNITY SURVEY APRIL 2018

Little Eaton Neighbourhood Plan Little Eaton Carnival - Community Consultation July 2018

Key Findings

July 2018

1 Introduction

Little Eaton Parish Council is preparing a Neighbourhood Plan.

On Sunday 1 July 2018 and Saturday 7 July it held two consultation events in support of its development. Both took place at ….

They both took place as an integral part of the Little Eaton Carnival. This was purposefully chosen to help maximise attendance by members of the community and stakeholders at the consultation. Held annually, the Little Eaton Carnival is the most popular, well known and well-attended community event in Little Eaton and the surrounding area.

The main aims of the event were threefold:

• To inform the community of the aims and background of the Little Eaton Neighbourhood Plan; • To outline progress to date; and • To gain views on the Plan’s emerging proposals and policies.

The events were extensively publicised throughout the community including through posters, word of mouth, and the Parish Council website.

2. Format of Event

Background Several display boards were made available to view within the Little Eaton Neighbourhood Plan Display Tent.

The format of the event was explained to people by the members of the Steering Group who attended and manned the displays over the two days.

Consultation The displays introduced neighbourhood planning, described the process on key issues that is being followed and the emerging ideas and proposals, specifically: • What is a Neighbourhood Plan? • Findings from the community questionnaire. ▪ Built Environment (including housing). ▪ Leisure and Facilities. ▪ Natural Environment . ▪ Businesses and Industry.

Maps were also displayed showing the Parish and some of its key features as well as proposed designations.

Having read the displays, attendees were asked to comment on the topics using the paper supplied or by speaking to one of the people manning the displays.

LITTLE EATON NEIGHBOURHOOD PLAN COMMUNITY CONSULTATION FINDINGS LITTLE EATON CARNIVAL – JULY 2018

3. Outcomes

The event was very well attended with over 230 people recorded as taking part over the two days. This may be an underestimate as some visitors may not have been counted at busy times.

The following written comments were received (broken down by theme).

General

• The Plan looks great so far. I think a lot of the ideas will need to be shaped carefully at a later stage i.e. agreements with developers and landowners. Thanks for all the efforts so far! • Pleased the results show common themes. • The right questions are asked. The range of consideration is good. • The Neighbourhood Plan looks well thought out, and I would like to offer my support.

Built Environment

• Rainwater run-off is causing local flooding and highway flooding. • I am worried about increasing surface water flooding after heavy rain. Climate change will increase this. So I would like to see measures to protect my and other properties.

Natural Environment

• Get Croft Corner to face the other way so that we can see the brook and paddle in the water. • Bottle Brook – access and appreciation for residents. Would Croft Corner Green space be turned around to face the Brook? • Good, but we can and should aim higher on community facilities and the natural environment to make the village better as a consequence of development.

Leisure and Facilities

• Having completed the questionnaire, have since visited the Hathersage Lido and think Little Eaton would really benefit from it. Neighbouring villages could attend with Little Eaton residents. School could assist with finding lottery funding, residents, fundraising. Would be happy to be part of a Steering Group. • Apparently, there would space for a Lido – we have so many open water swimming in the village. Would be amazing. • Sort out the cycle lane into the south bound direction as getting on to it from the road does’nt work (Ok if cycling from Starbucks). (This needs priority over the Starbucks entrance, but this is a separate issue.

Several non-recorded verbal comments were also received.

LITTLE EATON NEIGHBOURHOOD PLAN COMMUNITY CONSULTATION FINDINGS LITTLE EATON CARNIVAL – JULY 2018

4.Summary of findings

The events were considered to be very successful. They were well attended, and a range of comments was received. Verbal and written feedback was almost always positive - in particular, on the Questionnaire (interest in the results); approval of the emerging policies and proposals and recognition of the work that had gone into the Neighbourhood Plan. There were no serious challenges or concerns, though some people considered that some parts of it could be strengthened, for example, in relation to flood defence or that consideration should be given to the introduction of a Lido. There was a high level of awareness of the Plan amongst visitors, and the events should have enhanced this awareness further.

LITTLE EATON NEIGHBOURHOOD PLAN COMMUNITY CONSULTATION FINDINGS LITTLE EATON CARNIVAL – JULY 2018

Little Eaton Parish Census 2011 Profile

This Parish Profile presents data from the 2011 Census which took place on 27th March 2011.

It provides comparisons against the borough, region and England averages.

Little Eaton Erewash East Midlands England No % % % % USUAL RESIDENTS BY AGE BAND Aged 0-4 101 4.2 5.8 6.0 6.3 Aged 5-15 343 14.1 12.1 12.5 12.6 Aged 16-64 1,514 62.3 64.2 64.5 64.8 Aged 65+ 472 19.4 17.8 17.1 16.3 All Usual Residents 2,430 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 ETHNIC GROUP White 2,387 98.2 97.0 89.3 85.4 Mixed/Multiple Ethnic groups 22 0.9 1.1 1.9 2.3 Asian 12 0.5 1.2 6.5 7.8 Black 7 0.3 0.5 1.8 3.5 Other Ethnic Groups 2 0.1 0.1 0.6 1.0 All Usual Residents 2,430 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 RELIGION Christian 1,610 66.3 57.8 58.8 59.4 Buddhist 6 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.5 Hindu - - 0.4 2.0 1.5 Jewish 2 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.5 Muslim - - 0.2 3.1 5.0 Sikh 5 0.2 0.3 1.0 0.8 Other Religion 9 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 No Religion 613 25.2 33.9 27.5 24.7 Religion Not Stated 185 7.6 6.9 6.8 7.2 All Usual Residents 2,430 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 HIGHEST LEVEL OF QUALIFICIATION No Qualifications 317 16.0 19.6 24.7 22.5 Level 1 Qualifications 224 11.3 13.3 13.9 13.3 Level 2 Qualifications 292 14.7 16.0 15.6 15.2 Apprenticeship 98 4.9 5.3 4.0 3.6 Level 3 Qualifications 226 11.4 11.7 12.9 12.4 Level 4 Qualifications and Above 746 37.6 28.2 23.6 27.4 Other Qualifications 83 4.2 6.0 5.3 5.7 All Usual Residents Aged 16 and Over 1,986 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 ECONOMIC ACTIVITY & INACTIVITY All Usual Residents Aged 16 to 74 1,767 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 Economically Active Total 1,264 71.5 73.5 69.3 69.9 Employee, Part-time 285 16.1 13.9 14.4 13.7 Employee, Full-time 677 38.3 44.6 38.8 38.6 Self Employed 210 11.9 8.9 8.7 9.8 Unemployed 49 2.8 3.6 4.2 4.4 Full-time Student (economically active) 43 2.4 2.5 3.3 3.4 Economically inactive Total 503 28.5 26.5 30.7 30.1 Retired 309 17.5 14.7 15.0 13.7 Student (including Full-Time Students) 71 4.0 3.9 5.8 5.8 Looking After Home or Family 53 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.4 Long-Term Sick or Disabled 49 2.8 2.8 4.1 4.0 Other 21 1.2 1.5 1.9 2.2

Prepared by Andrew Towlerton Associates on behalf of Little Eaton Parish Council – December 2017 Little Eaton Erewash East Midlands England No % % % % METHOD OF TRAVEL TO WORK Work Mainly at or From Home 108 6.1 2.6 3.3 3.5 Underground, Metro, Light Rail, Tram 1 0.1 0.1 0.2 2.6 Train 18 1.0 1.0 0.9 3.5 Bus, Minibus or Coach 55 3.1 4.7 4.0 4.9 Taxi 2 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.3 Motorcycle, Scooter or Moped 15 0.8 0.8 0.5 0.5 Driving a Car or Van 842 47.7 44.7 42.2 36.9 Passenger in a Car or Van 55 3.1 3.5 3.9 3.3 Bicycle 24 1.4 2.3 1.8 1.9 On Foot 82 4.6 6.3 7.1 6.9 Other Method of Travel to Work 7 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.4 Not in Employment 558 31.6 33.6 35.7 35.3 All Usual Residents Aged 16 to 74 1,767 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 HEALTH Very Good Health 1,209 49.8 44.0 45.3 47.2 Good Health 808 33.3 35.4 35.1 34.2 Fair Health 305 12.6 15.0 14.0 13.1 Bad Health 80 3.3 4.3 4.3 4.2 Very Bad Health 28 1.2 1.3 1.2 1.2 All Usual Residents 2,430 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 Long-Term Health Problem or Disability Day-to-Day Activities Limited a Lot 177 7.3 8.9 8.7 8.3 Day-to-Day Activities Limited a Little 252 10.4 10.4 9.9 9.3 Day-to-Day Activities Not Limited 2,001 82.3 80.7 81.4 82.4 All Usual Residents 2,430 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 Provision of Unpaid Care Provides No Unpaid Care 2,137 87.9 88.8 89.2 89.8 Provides 1 to 19 Hours Unpaid Care a Week 209 8.6 7.3 6.9 6.5 Provides 20 to 49 Hours Unpaid Care a Week 28 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.4 Provides 50 or More Hours Unpaid Care a Week 56 2.3 2.6 2.5 2.4 All Usual Residents 2,430 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 HOUSEHOLDS AND HOUSEHOLD SPACES All Household Spaces 1,041 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 Household Spaces With At Least One Usual Resident 1,015 97.5 96.3 96.0 95.7 Household Spaces With No Usual Residents (empty homes) 26 2.5 3.7 4.0 4.3 COMMUNAL ESTABLISHMENTS Number of communal establishments 1 All usual residents in communal establishments - TENURE All occupied Households 1,015 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 Owned; Owned Outright 446 43.9 33.9 32.8 30.6 Owned; Owned with a Mortgage or Loan 378 37.2 38.6 34.5 32.8 Shared Ownership (Part Owned and Part Rented) - 0.0 0.5 0.7 0.8 Social Rented; Rented from Council (Local Authority) 19 1.9 4.1 10.1 9.4 Social Rented; Other 77 7.6 8.9 5.7 8.3 Private Rented; Private Landlord or Letting Agency 81 8.0 11.8 13.6 15.4 Private Rented; Other 7 0.7 1.0 1.3 1.4 Living Rent Free 7 0.7 1.2 1.3 1.3 ACCOMMODATION TYPE All household spaces (occupied + vacant) 1,041 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 Detached 516 49.6 28.3 32.2 22.3 Semi-Detached 315 30.3 44.2 35.1 30.7 Terraced 145 13.9 19.1 20.6 24.5 Flat, Maisonette or Apartment 51 4.9 8.3 11.7 22.1 Caravan or Other Mobile or Temporary Structure 14 1.3 0.1 0.4 0.4 NUMBER OF BEDROOMS All Household Spaces With At Least One Usual Resident 1,015 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 No Bedrooms - 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.2 1 Bedroom 52 5.1 7.2 8.1 11.8 2 Bedrooms 201 19.8 28.4 26.5 27.9 3 Bedrooms 496 48.9 49.7 45.4 41.2 4 Bedrooms 208 20.5 12.1 15.4 14.4 5 or More Bedrooms 58 5.7 2.5 4.4 4.6

Prepared by Andrew Towlerton Associates on behalf of Little Eaton Parish Council – December 2017 Little Eaton Erewash East Midlands England No % % % % DEPRIVATION All occupied Households 1,015 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 Household is Not Deprived in Any Dimension 529 52.1 43.0 42.8 42.5 Household is Deprived in 1 Dimension 304 30.0 31.4 32.4 32.7 Household is Deprived in 2 Dimensions 151 14.9 20.4 19.6 19.1 Household is Deprived in 3 Dimensions 29 2.9 4.8 4.8 5.1 Household is Deprived in 4 Dimensions 2 0.2 0.4 0.4 0.5 HOUSEHOLD SIZE All Household Spaces With At Least One Usual Resident 1,015 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 1 Person in Household 240 23.6 29.1 29.0 30.2 2 People in Household 402 39.6 37.3 36.2 34.2 3 People in Household 152 15.0 16.5 15.6 15.6 4 People in Household 182 17.9 12.6 12.9 13.0 5 People in Household 33 3.3 3.4 4.3 4.7 6 People in Household 5 0.5 0.9 1.4 1.7 7 People in Household 1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 8 or More People in Household - - 0.1 0.2 0.3 CAR OR VAN AVAILABILITY All occupied Households 1,015 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 No Cars or Vans in Household 110 10.8 22.4 22.1 25.8 1 Car or Van in Household 392 38.6 43.6 42.5 42.2 2 Cars or Vans in Household 397 39.1 27.0 27.4 24.7 3 Cars or Vans in Household 86 8.5 5.3 6.0 5.5 4 or More Cars or Vans in Household 30 3.0 1.7 2.0 1.9 All Cars or Vans in Area 1,580 Source: Office for National Statistics licensed under the Open Government Licence v.3.0.

The data in this profile is derived from the following tables c/o NOMIS website and is subject to Crown Copyright.

Economic Activity, 2011 (QS601EW); Tenure, 2011 (KS402EW); Religion, 2011 (KS209EW); Accommodation Type - Households, 2011 (QS402EW); Number of Bedrooms, 2011 (QS411EW); Provision of Unpaid Care, 2011 (QS301EW); Households by Deprivation Dimensions, 2011 (QS119EW); Age Structure, 2011 (KS102EW); Tenure - Households, 2011 (QS405EW); Household Size, 2011 (QS406EW); Ethnic Group, 2011 (QS201EW); Long-Term Health Problem or Disability, 2011 (QS303EW); Car or Van Availability, 2011 (QS416EW); Method of Travel to Work, 2011 (QS701EW); Household Spaces, 2011 (QS417EW); Dwellings, Household Spaces and Accommodation Type, 2011 (KS401EW); General Health, 2011 (QS302EW); Highest Level of Qualification, 2011 (QS501EW)

Prepared by Andrew Towlerton Associates on behalf of Little Eaton Parish Council – December 2017

Little Eaton Neighbourhood Plan Housing Need and Characteristics Study

Supporting Evidence – July 2018

July 2018

Introduction

This report provides an assessment of housing need and characteristics in the Parish of Little Eaton.

It draws on the latest available data, at the time of writing, from the Census, Land Registry and Office for National Statistics, small area model-based income estimates, housing data held by Erewash Borough Council and others as well as the findings from local consultation exercises.

Its primary aim is to help Little Easton Neighbourhood Plan Steering Group, Little Easton Parish Council and others better understand local housing need and characteristics to inform and support policies in the neighbourhood plan.

It should be stressed that it provides an assessment of housing need and characteristics, its findings should be viewed as providing guidance prepared in good faith and based on the best available evidence, as national planning policy guidance states, “establishing housing need is not an exact science, and no single approach will provide a definitive answer1”. Population Age Profile

According to the 2011 Census, the Little Eaton Parish had an estimated population of 2,557 residents living in 1,015 households dispersed across 491.8 hectares, equating to a population density of 4.9 persons per hectare. This compares with 10.2 for Erewash Borough, 2.9 for East Midlands and 4.1 for England. There were 26 vacant dwellings representing a 2.5% vacancy rate. There was one establishment providing accommodation for a small number of residents. Since 2001 the number of residents living in the Parish is estimated to have fallen by around 5% (127 people). However, the number of dwellings (occupied and vacant) increased, rising by 7 (0.7%). 18% of residents were aged under 16 which is in line with the borough and region rate but below the England (19%) average. Around 62% of residents were aged between 16 and 64 which was below the borough and region (64%) and national (65%) rates. There is a slightly over-representation of older people with 19% of residents aged 65 and over when compared with the borough (18%), regional (17%) and national (16%) rates. The median age of people living in the Parish was 45, which is older than the borough (41), region (40) and national (39) rates.

1 https://www.gov.uk/guidance/housing-and-economic-development-needs-assessments LITTLE EATON NEIGHBOURHOOD PLAN HOUSING NEED AND CHARACTERSITICS – SUPPORTING EVIDENCE JULY 2018

Table 1: Usual Residents by Age Band, 2011 East Little Eaton Erewash England Midlands No % % % % Aged 0-4 101 4.2 5.8 6.0 6.3 Aged 5-15 343 14.1 12.1 12.5 12.6 Aged 16-64 1,514 62.3 64.2 64.5 64.8 Aged 65+ 472 19.4 17.8 17.1 16.3 All Usual Residents 2,430 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 Median age 45 41 40 39 Source: Census 2011, KS102

A more detailed breakdown of age bands reveals that at the time of the 2011 Census, Little Eaton had a higher proportion of residents aged 40 and over, particularly amongst the 60 to 69 age. It has a lower representation of people aged been 20 and 39 which may reflect lack of affordable and suitable accommodation for young people entering the housing market.

Figure 1 Population by 10 year age bands, 2011

Source: Census 2011, QS103

There is evidence of an ageing population with the proportion of residents aged 65 and over increasing from 16% in 2001 to 19% in 2011. The Census shows the number of residents aged 65+ rose by 16% (66 people) during this period.

Research shows the number of older people will grow significantly in the future and relative growth will be highest in older cohorts. Latest available population projections2 suggest that Erewash’s 65 plus age group is forecast to grow by around 49% between 2014 and 2034.

2 Subnational Population Projections for Local Authorities in England: 2014 based LITTLE EATON NEIGHBOURHOOD PLAN HOUSING NEED AND CHARACTERSITICS – SUPPORTING EVIDENCE JULY 2018

Deprivation

The English Indices of Deprivation measure relative levels of deprivation in 32,844 small areas or neighbourhoods, called Lower-layer Super Output Areas (LSOAs) in England. Little Eaton Parish comprises of two LSOAs (E01019670 – north/central Little Eaton and E01019671 – south Little Eaton but also includes Breadsall and Morley). The overall Index of Multiple Deprivation Decile (where 1 is most deprived 10% of LSOAs) (IMD) shows that on the whole, the Parish displays relatively low levels of deprivation ranking in the 7th and 9th decile on the overall 2015 Index. The following map illustrates overall Index of Multiple Deprivation deciles within the Erewash borough. Little Eaton Parish is denoted by a red boundary to the centre of the borough.

Figure 2 Index of Multiple Deprivation Deciles, 2015, Erewash Borough Council

Economic Activity

The following table illustrates the working status of usual residents aged 16 to 74. In Little Eaton this accounts for 73% of the population, which higher than the regional (69%) and England (70%) rates and the same as the borough (73%) average. It had a higher than average share of self-employed residents; the unemployment rate was relatively low.

LITTLE EATON NEIGHBOURHOOD PLAN HOUSING NEED AND CHARACTERSITICS – SUPPORTING EVIDENCE JULY 2018

Table 2: Economic Activity and Inactivity, 2011 East Little Eaton Erewash England Midlands No % % % % All Usual Residents Aged 16 to 74 1,767 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 Economically Active Total 1,264 71.5 73.5 69.3 69.9 Employee, Part-time 285 16.1 13.9 38.8 38.6 Employee, Full-time 677 38.3 44.6 14.4 13.7 Self Employed 210 11.9 8.9 8.7 9.8 Unemployed 49 2.8 3.6 4.2 4.4 Full-time Student (econ active) 43 2.4 2.5 3.3 3.4 Economically inactive Total 503 28.5 26.5 30.7 30.1 Retired 309 17.5 14.7 15.0 13.7 Student (including Full-Time 71 4.0 3.9 Students) 5.8 5.8 Looking After Home or Family 53 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.4 Long-Term Sick or Disabled 49 2.8 2.8 4.1 4.0 Other 21 1.2 1.5 1.9 2.2 Source: Census 2011, QS601E Household Size

At the time of the 2011 Census, the average household size in the Little Eaton Parish was 2.4 people, which was in line with the England rate and above the borough and region (2.3) rates. The average number of rooms per household stood at 6.1 which was above the borough (5.5), region (5.6) and England (5.4) averages. The average number of bedrooms per household stood at 3.0 which was higher than the region (2.8), borough and England (2.7) rates. Housing Characteristics

Tenure Home ownership levels are significantly high with around 81% of households owning their homes outright or with a mortgage or loan. This is higher than the borough (72%), regional (67%) and national (63%) rates. Just 9% of households live in social rented accommodation which is lower than the borough (13%), region (16%) and national (18%) rates. Around 9% of households live in private rented accommodation which is in lower than the borough (13%), region (15%) and national (17%) rates.

LITTLE EATON NEIGHBOURHOOD PLAN HOUSING NEED AND CHARACTERSITICS – SUPPORTING EVIDENCE JULY 2018

Table 3: Tenure, 2011 East Little Eaton Erewash England Midlands % % All occupied Households 1,015 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 Owned; Owned Outright 446 43.9 33.9 32.8 30.6 Owned; Owned with a Mortgage or Loan 378 37.2 38.6 34.5 32.8 Shared Ownership (Part Owned/Part Rented) - 0.0 0.5 0.7 0.8 Social Rented; Rented from Council 19 1.9 4.1 10.1 9.4 (Local Authority) Social Rented; Other 77 7.6 8.9 5.7 8.3 Private Rented; Private Landlord or 81 8.0 11.8 13.6 15.4 Letting Agency Private Rented; Other 7 0.7 1.0 1.3 1.4 Living Rent Free 7 0.7 1.2 1.3 1.3 Source: Census 2011, KS402EW

Accommodation Type Data from the 2011 Census shows that the half (50%) of residential dwellings were detached which is somewhat higher than the borough (41%), regional (32%) and national (22%) shares. Semi-detached housing accounts for around 30% of the housing stock against 44% for the borough, 35% for the region and 31% nationally. Terraced housing, flats and apartments provide just 19% of accommodation spaces which is lower than the borough (27%), region (32%) and national (47%) shares.

Table 4: Accommodation Type, 2011

East Little Eaton Erewash England Midlands No % % % % All household spaces 1,041 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 (occupied + vacant) Detached 516 49.6 28.3 32.2 22.3 Semi-Detached 315 30.3 44.2 35.1 30.7 Terraced 145 13.9 19.1 20.6 24.5 Flat, Maisonette or Apartment 51 4.9 8.3 11.7 22.1 Caravan or Other Mobile or 14 1.3 0.1 0.4 0.4 Temporary Structure Source: Census 2011, KS405EW

Number of Bedrooms and Occupancy Rates Over a quarter (26%) of households live in houses with four or more bedrooms a figure which is somewhat high when compared with the borough (15%), regional (20%) and England (19%) rates. There is an under- representation of housing for single people with just 5% of dwellings having one bedroom against 7% for the borough, 8% for the region and 12% for England.

LITTLE EATON NEIGHBOURHOOD PLAN HOUSING NEED AND CHARACTERSITICS – SUPPORTING EVIDENCE JULY 2018

Table 5 Households by number of bedrooms, 2011 East Bedrooms Little Eaton Erewash England Midlands All occupied Household Spaces 1,015 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 No Bedrooms - 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.2 1 Bedroom 52 5.1 7.2 8.1 11.8 2 Bedrooms 201 19.8 28.4 26.5 27.9 3 Bedrooms 496 48.9 49.7 45.4 41.2 4 Bedrooms 208 20.5 12.1 15.4 14.4 5 or More Bedrooms 58 5.7 2.5 4.4 4.6 Source: Census 2011, LC4405EW

There is evidence of under-occupancy (having more bedrooms than the notional number recommended by the bedroom standard). Analysis of the 2011 Census shows that around 47% of all occupied households in the Parish have two or more spare bedrooms and around 36% have one spare bedroom. Under occupancy is higher than the borough, regional and national averages.

Figure 3: Bedroom Occupancy Rates, All Households, 2011

Source: Census 2011, QS412EW

Under occupancy in the Parish is particularly evident in larger properties with 45% of households with 4 or more bedrooms occupied by just one or two people. This is higher than the borough (41%), region (43%) and England (41%) rates.

LITTLE EATON NEIGHBOURHOOD PLAN HOUSING NEED AND CHARACTERSITICS – SUPPORTING EVIDENCE JULY 2018

Table 6 Household with 4 or more bedrooms by household size, 2011 East Little Eaton Erewash England Midlands HHs with 4 or more bedrooms 266 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 1 person in household 20 7.5 9.7 10.4 10.6 2 people in household 100 37.6 31.7 32.3 30.3 3 people in household 45 16.9 20.5 18.8 18.3 4 or more people in household 101 38.0 38.1 38.5 40.8 Source: Census 2011, LC4405EW

Census data also suggests that older person households are more likely to under-occupy their dwellings. Data from the 2011 Census allows us to investigate this using the bedroom standard. In total, around 62% of pensioner households have an occupancy rating of +2 or more (meaning there are at least two more bedrooms that are technically required by the household) and is somewhat higher than the 42% non-pensioner household rate.

Figure 4: Bedroom Occupancy rating of Older Person Households, Little Eaton Parish, 2011

Source: Census 2011, LC4105EW

Overcrowding is not a significant issue. However, research shows that households with dependent children are more likely to be overcrowded.

LITTLE EATON NEIGHBOURHOOD PLAN HOUSING NEED AND CHARACTERSITICS – SUPPORTING EVIDENCE JULY 2018

Figure 5: Bedroom Occupancy rating of Family Households Little Eaton Parish, 2011

Source: Census 2011, LC4105EW

Housing Market

Council Tax Bands The chart below provides a breakdown of the proportion of dwellings in the Little Eaton, Breadsall and Morley area by Council Tax Band compared to the district, region and national averages at 2017. Domestic properties with Council Tax band B make up the largest group (approximately 26% of the total) in the area. It has a higher proportion of properties with high-value council tax bands with 13% of dwellings having a Council Tax Band F or above against 3% for the borough, 5% for the region and 9% for England.

LITTLE EATON NEIGHBOURHOOD PLAN HOUSING NEED AND CHARACTERSITICS – SUPPORTING EVIDENCE JULY 2018

Figure 6: Dwelling Stock by Council Tax Band Little Eaton, Breadsall and Morley Area 2017

Council Tax: Table CTSOP 4.1, Stock of Properties, England and Wales, 2017 VOA

An analysis of annual publications from the Valuation Office Agency (VOA) which provides a series of tables on the number of properties by Council Tax band for each property type and indicates that domestic properties built before 1900 were the largest group in Gretton, with 17% (16%, England).

Figure 7 provides a breakdown of properties by build period and shows evidence of a small number of new homes being built during more recent years. There are no records of dwellings having been built between 1939 and 1945 due to the Second World War. In some cases, the period when the property was built has not been recorded on the VOA system.

Please note the Stock of Properties data is derived by using LSOA3 boundary geography which best fits the Parish boundary.

3 E01019670 and E01019671 LITTLE EATON NEIGHBOURHOOD PLAN HOUSING NEED AND CHARACTERSITICS – SUPPORTING EVIDENCE JULY 2018

Figure 7: Build Period of Property in the Little Eaton, Breadsall and Morley Area

Council Tax: Table CTSOP 4.1, Stock of Properties, England and Wales, 2017 VOA

Residential Sales Land Registry price paid data shows around 816 residential property sales were recorded in the Parish between 1995 and 2016. At 49% detached housing accounted for the majority of sales, 34% were semi-detached, 16% terraced and 1% flats/apartments. It should be noted that not all sales are captured by the Land Registry, for example, properties that were not full market value, right to buy, and compulsory purchase orders will be excluded.

Figure 8:

Some 28 new build residential sales were recorded between 1995 and 2016, representing 3.4% of total sales recorded by the Land Registry in the area. Figure 7 below shows the volume of sales together with the overall annual average house price.

LITTLE EATON NEIGHBOURHOOD PLAN HOUSING NEED AND CHARACTERSITICS – SUPPORTING EVIDENCE JULY 2018

Figure 9:

During this period, the majority (67%) of new build residential sales were detached (Figure 10). It should be noted that not all new builds will be captured in the Land Registry price paid data, e.g. some conversions and social housing units will be excluded.

Figure 10:

LITTLE EATON NEIGHBOURHOOD PLAN HOUSING NEED AND CHARACTERSITICS – SUPPORTING EVIDENCE JULY 2018

Figure below illustrates average house prices for Erewash and the national average compared to the estimated average for Little Eaton. It shows that the average house price is higher than the borough and close to the national trend. It should be noted, that due to the relatively small number of sales at the parish level, it is not possible to produce robust median rates and comparisons with larger areas must be treated with caution.

Figure 11:

Housing Affordability

The publication of ONS House Price Statistics for Small Areas presents an opportunity for housing affordability analysis.

The data reveals the cost of an entry-level4 property on average across England and Wales has increased by almost 20% in the last decade, to £140,000 (year ending June 2016). For new properties, the price was nearly £180,000. The data5 also shows that home-ownership prospects vary across the country.

In the Little Eaton Parish area6 a low to mid-priced property costs on average £160,000 which is higher than the national average. Assuming a 15% deposit7, those entering the property market in the area would require a household income of £30,222 (£26,444 E&W average) and savings of £26,700

4 The term ‘entry level’ or ‘low to mid-priced property’ refers to the lower quartile price paid for residential properties. If all properties sold in a year were ranked from highest to lowest, this would be the value half way between the bottom and the middle. 5 Property price data are for year ending June 2016 and are from House Price Statistics for Small Areas. Income data are for financial year ending 2014 and are from small area model-based income estimates. 6 The Little Eaton Parish area is based on MSOA best fit (E02005396) which also takes in a number of other local settlements including Wymondham, Sewstern, Saxby). 7 Data from the Council of Mortgage Lenders suggest that the average deposit paid by first-time buyers in the UK was around 18% in December 2016. LITTLE EATON NEIGHBOURHOOD PLAN HOUSING NEED AND CHARACTERSITICS – SUPPORTING EVIDENCE JULY 2018

Prospective buyers would require an estimated £700 for stamp duty, £2,000 for legal and moving costs and £24,000 for a 15% deposit, coming to £26,700 in total which is a challenge for many entry-level households.

Erewash Borough Council Strategic Policies

Nottingham Core Housing Market Assessment

Little Eaton is part of the Nottingham Core Housing Market Area - which includes the local authority areas of Erewash, Nottingham City, Broxtowe, Rushcliffe, Gedling as well as the Hucknall area of Ashfield district.

While this Housing Market Area is much wider than Little Eaton, it is still relevant to this housing need and characteristics assessment.

A Housing Market Assessment was carried out for the Nottingham Core Area and the individual local authority areas within it. The purpose of the assessment was to establish a robust evidential base for the development of a long-term strategic view of housing need and demand.

With regard to Erewash Borough, its main conclusion was to highlight the need for more affordable housing, stating that there is, “a continued and urgent need to provide alternative housing options for those unable to access of the private market8”.

Erewash Housing Needs Surveys

During 2010, Midlands Rural Housing and Erewash Borough Council worked together to undertake Housing Needs Studies in rural villages In Erewash9. Little Eaton was one of the parishes covered in the study.

The aim of the survey was to assess the current and future housing needs in the rural parishes in order to provide Erewash Borough Council with the information it requires to formulate plans and anticipate future housing requirements.

Its main conclusions relevant to this assessment were:

8 file:///C:/Users/yourl/Desktop/Little%20Eaton/Z_-_Erewash_HMANeedsUpdate_-_2012_pdf.pdf 9 file:///C:/Users/yourl/Desktop/Little%20Eaton/Erewash_Summary_Report._Rural_Housing_Needs_Surveys.June_ 2010_tcm20-140316.pdf LITTLE EATON NEIGHBOURHOOD PLAN HOUSING NEED AND CHARACTERSITICS – SUPPORTING EVIDENCE JULY 2018

• “All the parishes are popular places to live due to their rural character and proximity to large urban areas that provide ample employment, shopping and leisure facilities”. • “All the parishes showed high levels of owner-occupation, low levels of privately rented property, and in most cases, low levels of social rented property. Properties in these rural parishes are largely family houses of 3 5 bedrooms. All parishes showed evidence of under-occupation of existing housing, with typically, over 60% of properties being occupied by single adults or couples”. • “All parishes have ageing populations with typically, families with children representing less than 30% of households and children under 16 representing less than 16% of population. Only the larger parishes of West Hallam and Little Eaton showed substantial numbers of children”. • “Inevitably, the high demand for housing in these sought after parishes, combined with the low supply of houses to the open market, for rent or purchase, leads to house values being high and therefore, unaffordable to many people on low incomes, including young starters and young families who are often still living at home, or living in expensive, privately rented accommodation. These two groups are the most affected groups in the villages surveyed”. • The total recommended housing units required for Little Eaton to meet housing need was between 8 – 11. • The breakdown of properties required was as follows o 2x2 bed houses for rent o 2x2 bed houses for Homebuy o 1x2 bed bungalow for rent o 1x2 bed bungalow for Homebuy o 2x3 bed houses for rent o 2x4 bed house for rent (1 adapted) o 1x4 bed house for Homebuy Findings from Community Consultation

In April 2018 the Little Eaton Neighbourhood Plan Steering Group undertook a survey of all households in the Parish. It received 387 responses. The survey specifically asked residents about housing needs. The relevant findings are summarised below

When asked about “What size of housing developments do you think would be most appropriate in the parish?”, the most common response to this question was that both smaller developments and individual homes would be the most appropriate both with about 67% of respondents selecting these options. Very few people (18.2% and 2.7%) thought that medium and large developments would be appropriate for the Parish and several comments

LITTLE EATON NEIGHBOURHOOD PLAN HOUSING NEED AND CHARACTERSITICS – SUPPORTING EVIDENCE JULY 2018

15 under the ‘other’ section called for no developments at all whilst some others believed that the disused and derelict sites in the village should be redeveloped.

Figure 12: “What size of housing developments do you think would be most appropriate in the Parish?” - village survey, 2018

The survey also “What type of dwellings do you think are needed in the Parish? The most commonly selected type of dwelling that people think is needed is small family homes with 71% (262) of people selecting that option. Also popular was affordable starter homes with just over 50% selecting this option (52.9% or 199). Retirement housing (36.4% or 134), detached houses (33.1% or 122) and semi-detached houses (31,4% or 116) also had some support with each being selected by about a third of respondents. Among the comments from those who selected ‘other’, there were many people reaffirming their point that there should no additional housing as they did in question four. A few responses that suggested that more bungalows were needed in the Parish.

LITTLE EATON NEIGHBOURHOOD PLAN HOUSING NEED AND CHARACTERSITICS – SUPPORTING EVIDENCE JULY 2018

Figure 13: “What types of Housing is required in the Parish” - village survey, April 2018

Summary and conclusions of Future Housing Need and Characteristics

This assessment aims to provide Little Eaton Neighbourhood Plan Steering Group with information and evidence on local housing need and characteristics drawn from a range of robust sources to support the development of Little Eaton Neighbourhood Plan.

Its main findings are

• At the time of the 2011 Census, Little Eaton Parish was home to around 2,430 residents living in 1,015 households. • Between 2001 and 2011, the population fell by around 5% (127 people). Conversely, during this period, the number of dwellings rose by 0.7% (7). • There is a higher than average proportion of older people residing in the Parish and evidence that the population is ageing with the share of residents aged 65 and over increasing from 16% of the total population in 2001 to 19% in 2011. • There is likely to be substantial growth in one-person households, driven primarily by an ageing population.

LITTLE EATON NEIGHBOURHOOD PLAN HOUSING NEED AND CHARACTERSITICS – SUPPORTING EVIDENCE JULY 2018

• Deprivation is not a significant issue. • There is a relative predominance of larger dwellings (3 or more bedrooms), which at 75.1% is well above the Erewash (64.3%) and national (60.2%) averages • Home ownership levels are very high with around 81% of households owning their homes outright or with a mortgage or loan • At 9% the share of households living in social rented accommodation is very low when compared with the borough, regional and national rates. • There is forecast to be substantial growth in one-person households over the Plan period, driven in part by an ageing population. • Housing affordability is a major issue for those on lower incomes. All it all provides some very clear evidence about housing need and characteristics. In particular, that the proportion of larger dwellings, 3 bedrooms or more, is substantially higher than in Erewash as a whole, the East Midlands or England. It also shows that under-occupation of dwellings, as evidenced by the number of spare bedrooms, is higher than in all these areas. It also points to that housing affordability is an issue. This provides clear evidence in support of a policy to encourage smaller and more affordable dwellings to meet an existing and growing need. The provision of the smaller types of dwellings may also help to address the relatively high number of properties that are under-occupied because of the household reducing in size - for example, elderly households continuing to occupy large family housing. This may allow older people to downsize thus freeing up larger properties for new families and young people.

LITTLE EATON NEIGHBOURHOOD PLAN HOUSING NEED AND CHARACTERSITICS – SUPPORTING EVIDENCE JULY 2018

Little Eaton Neighbourhood Plan – Proposed Character Buildings and Structures of Local Heritage Interest - Supporting Evidence

JULY 2018

Context

This supporting paper explains the background designation of the proposed Little Eaton Local Character Buildings and Structures of Local Heritage Interest in the draft Neighbourhood Plan. It sets out the background to the proposed Local Character Buildings and Structures of Local Heritage Interest and explains the methodology used.

Policy Context

The National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF)1 sets out the Government’s planning policies for England and how these are expected to be applied. Section 12 (paragraphs 126-141) of the NPPF covers all aspects of the historic environment. Paragraph 126 states that “Local planning authorities should set out in their Local Plan a positive strategy for the conservation and enjoyment of the historic environment”. The definition of heritage asset in the Framework is “a building, monument, site, place, area or landscape identified as having a degree of significance meriting consideration in planning decisions, because of its heritage interest”. The NPPF also introduces the concept of non-designated heritage assets. A non-designated heritage asset is described as a, “building, monument, site, place, area or landscape identified as having a degree of significance but which is not afforded statutory protection through Listed Building, Scheduled Monument etc”. Paragraph 135 of the Framework states that non-designated heritage assets can merit consideration in planning matters, “taking a balanced judgement having regard to the scale of any harm or loss and the significance of the heritage asset”. The following report identifies assets in the Parish that have been identified of special local heritage interest to meriting consideration in planning decisions but which are not formally designated heritage assets. The Plan has taken the opportunity, using published good practice guidance from Erewash Borough Council2, to identify a schedule of assets that are considered to have significant local heritage interest. To ensure that these assets are considered appropriately in planning proposals, the Plan designates them as Little Eaton Character Buildings and Structures of Local Heritage Interest. An approach which is supported by the adopted Erewash Core Strategy (2014)3. A good example is Policy 11: The Historic Environment, which states “Proposals and initiatives will be supported where the significance of heritage assets and their settings would be sustained or enhanced” and specifically highlights in section d) “identifying heritage assets worthy of designation locally, including the identification of potential conservation areas”.

1 https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/6077/2116950.pdf) 2 https://www.erewash.gov.uk/media/files/Environment-and- Planning/Planning/Conservation/Local_List/Adopted_Criteria_for_Local_Heritage_Designation.pdf 3 https://www.erewash.gov.uk/media/files/Final_Core_Strategy_-_Version_for_Website.pdf Little Eaton Neighbourhood Plan - Little Eaton Local Character Buildings and Structures of Local Heritage Interest July 2018 2

The process for the identification of Little Eaton Character Buildings and Structures of Local Heritage Interest

The potential assets were identified through three main sources: • Firstly, local knowledge; • Secondly, historic environmental records, for example, that contained on the HeritageGateway database4, Nationally Listed Buildings and Erewash’s List of Buildings (‘’Local List’) of Local Interest5 (figure one at the end of the document contains a schedule of nationally and locally listed buildings in the Parish); and • Specialist input from bodies such as the Little Eaton Local History Society. Through this process, a list of potential buildings and structures were developed. The proposed assets were then assessed for their appropriateness for designation as local character buildings and structures using the process and criterion developed by Erewash Brough Council6, and set out below. This was purposefully chosen to ensure a consistent approach, and that it was based on good practice. Satisfied that they met, in principle, the criteria for going forward as local character buildings and structures of local heritage interest, they were then “tested” through the Plan process.

4 http://www.heritagegateway.org.uk/Gateway/Results.aspx 5 https://www.erewash.gov.uk/conservation/list-of-buildings-of-local-interest.html 6 https://www.erewash.gov.uk/media/files/Environment-and- Planning/Planning/Conservation/Local_List/Adopted_Criteria_for_Local_Heritage_Designation.pdf Little Eaton Neighbourhood Plan - Little Eaton Local Character Buildings and Structures of Local Heritage Interest July 2018 3

PRE-1850 HOUSES

Little Eaton Neighbourhood Plan - Little Eaton Local Character Buildings and Structures of Local Heritage Interest July 2018 4

PARK FARM AND DOVE BARN Vicarage Lane DE21 5EA

Appears on the maps of 1789, with Lord Scarsdale as copyholder. Taken over from the Deans of Lincoln in 1845 by the Church Commissioners and described as ‘small farmhouse, stone and thatch. In moderate repair. Barn, three bays, stone and thatch and small cowshed’. Privately owned since 1921.

THE ANCHOR INN ALFRETON ROAD DE21 5AA

One of the original village pubs, it used to serve as an early collecting point for the post. It is now a private residence.

Little Eaton Neighbourhood Plan - Little Eaton Local Character Buildings and Structures of Local Heritage Interest July 2018 5

HOLME COTTAGE 67 DUFFIELD ROAD DE21 5DS

Holme Cottage was believed to have been built between 1720 and 1740. It was originally thatched and extended in the 1850s.

WYNDESMORE

Appears on the Award map of 1789. Extended by the Curry family in the late 19th century.

Little Eaton Neighbourhood Plan - Little Eaton Local Character Buildings and Structures of Local Heritage Interest July 2018 6

PARK VIEW COTTAGES DE21 5AW

These cottages stand behind Alfreton Road on what was originally the route to cross Bottle Brook.

THE NEW INN DUFFIELD ROAD DE21 5DR

The inn was built in the 1800s to serve workers on the canal and the gangway

Little Eaton Neighbourhood Plan - Little Eaton Local Character Buildings and Structures of Local Heritage Interest July 2018 7

MILL GREEN COTTAGES AND OUTBUILDINGS DE21 5AA

There was a bleach mill on this site for most of the 18th and 19th centuries. The mill has now been converted into a private house and the pond has been filled in. Of the four remaining properties on the site, one has been renovated while three are derelict. The cottages are constructed partly of stone and partly of brick, a feature of this area.

THE BELL AND HARP INN, ALFRETON RD DE21 5AT

The pub was built for travellers crossing Alfreton Road to Eaton Bank via the packhorse trail along Whittaker Lane.

Little Eaton Neighbourhood Plan - Little Eaton Local Character Buildings and Structures of Local Heritage Interest July 2018 8

SYCAMORE COTTAGE, 42 WHITTAKER LANE DE21 5AT

Sycamore Cottage sits in Whittaker Lane (see above) and is one of several older stone cottages built along the lane and appearing on maps from 1789.

EDGEHILL EATON BANK DE56 4BH

Built in 1818 for the Rev. James Ord. The property is entered via an ornate red brick Lodge and stone gate piers. The building may merit historic interest due to its close association with Henry Swingler.

Little Eaton Neighbourhood Plan - Little Eaton Local Character Buildings and Structures of Local Heritage Interest July 2018 9

THE GROVE, 126 DUFFIELD ROAD DE56 5DU

Believed to have been built around 1850.

THE UNITED REFORMED CHURCH, ALFRETON ROAD DE21 5DF

Built in 1846, originally the Congregational Chapel.

Little Eaton Neighbourhood Plan - Little Eaton Local Character Buildings and Structures of Local Heritage Interest July 2018 10

THE SHOE MAKER’S COTTAGE ALFRETON ROAD DE21 5AA

Stone house with slate roof. Appears on the Tithe Map of 1850

THE OLD POST OFFICE ALFRETON ROAD DE21 5AA

The old Post Office, now a private house. Appears on the Tithe Map of 1850

Little Eaton Neighbourhood Plan - Little Eaton Local Character Buildings and Structures of Local Heritage Interest July 2018 11

195-199 ALFRETON ROAD DE21 5AA

A terrace of three stone houses. Appear on the Tithe Map of 1850.

62 EATON BANK

Stone built farmhouse built in 1728 and extended in 1779. Family home of Thomas Bates, a generous benefactor to the village. Situated in the World heritage site Buffer Zone

Little Eaton Neighbourhood Plan - Little Eaton Local Character Buildings and Structures of Local Heritage Interest July 2018 12

SPECIAL CHARACTER

AREA

Little Eaton Neighbourhood Plan - Little Eaton Local Character Buildings and Structures of Local Heritage Interest July 2018 13

THE PRIMARY SCHOOL ALFRETON ROAD DE21 5AB

The school was built in 1884 to replace the Church Hall National School and the Boys’ School on Barley Close. The clock was added in 1897 to mark Queen Victoria’s Golden Jubilee and the weather vane added in 2000 to celebrate the Millennium.

MILL GREEN COTTAGES ALFRETON ROAD DE21 5AA See previous section

Little Eaton Neighbourhood Plan - Little Eaton Local Character Buildings and Structures of Local Heritage Interest July 2018 14

THE OLD POST OFFICE ALFRETON ROAD DE21 5AA

See previous section

THE METHODIST CHURCH ALFRETON ROAD DE21 5AA

Built in 1906, now a private residence known as Baines Hall.

Little Eaton Neighbourhood Plan - Little Eaton Local Character Buildings and Structures of Local Heritage Interest July 2018 15

206 ALFRETON ROAD DE21 5AA Originally Baileys Farm, it was a farmhouse from the 1800s. It is now a

private residence

195-199 ALFRETON ROAD DE21 5AA

See previous section

Little Eaton Neighbourhood Plan - Little Eaton Local Character Buildings and Structures of Local Heritage Interest July 2018 16

THE ANCHOR INN ALFRETON ROAD DE21 5AA

See Previous section

THE SHOE MAKER’S COTTAGE ALFRETON ROAD DE21 5AA

See previous section

Little Eaton Neighbourhood Plan - Little Eaton Local Character Buildings and Structures of Local Heritage Interest July 2018 17

OTHER BUILDINGS OF INTEREST

Little Eaton Neighbourhood Plan - Little Eaton Local Character Buildings and Structures of Local Heritage Interest July 2018

EATON HILL AND LODGE ALFRETON ROAD DE21 5AD

This house was built by the Currey family, prominent local architects, during the Victorian era. It served as a children’s home from the 1940s to the 1990s. It is now a private residence

Little Eaton Neighbourhood Plan - Little Eaton Local Character Buildings and Structures of Local Heritage Interest July 2018 19

HIERONS WOOD VICARAGE LANE DE21 5EA

This Arts and Crafts house was first known work of Peter Woore RIBA designed in stone and built in 1927. One of three houses built in quarries, one of stone one of brick and one of wood.

6 EATON BANK DE56 4BJ

The brick Arts and Crafts house also designed by Peter Woore.

Little Eaton Neighbourhood Plan - Little Eaton Local Character Buildings and Structures of Local Heritage Interest July 2018 20

WOODEN HOUSE IN QUARRY RIGGA LANE DE21 DW

No picture available

The third Woore house, built in wood. The owners did not want a photograph of this house displayed.

THE ALMS HOUSES CHURCH LANE DE21 5EB

These were built in 1939 with funds bequeathed by Thomas Bates

Little Eaton Neighbourhood Plan - Little Eaton Local Character Buildings and Structures of Local Heritage Interest July 2018 21

Figure 1: Nationally and Locally Important Designated Heritage Assets in Little Eaton

LISTED BUILDINGS’ (2017):

Name of Asset Derwent House, Eaton Bank The Hatherings, Vicarage Lane The Poplars, Station Rd Church Farm, Brick Barn, Stone Barn and Long Barn, The Town/Vicarage Lane Queens Head Inn, Alfreton Road St Pauls Church, Vicarage Lane Church Hall (Parish Room), Vicarage Lane The Elms Farmhouse, Duffield Road Former Malthouse and Tannery, Duffield Road The Clock House, Duffield Road

EREWASH BOROUGH COUNCIL ADOPTED LIST OF BUILDINGS OF LOCAL INTEREST

Name of Asset Peckwash Mills, Eaton Bank Edgehill, Eaton Bank 15 to 17 Rigga Lane, Rigga Lane Farm building at 1 Brooks Hollow Sycamore Cottage, Whittaker Lane

Little Eaton Neighbourhood Plan - Little Eaton Local Character Buildings and Structures of Local Heritage Interest July 2018 Wildlife in Little Eaton

By Oliver Foulds, Living Landscapes Adviser (South) , Derbyshire Wildlife Trust & Scott McKenzie, Living Rivers Officer , Derbyshire Wildlife Trust

Little Eaton parish lies within the Derwent Valley Living Landscape, a stretch of wildlife habitats, farmland and settlements over fifty - five miles in length. This Living Landscape is characterised by large ancient woodlands and parklands as well as many pockets of spe cies - rich grassland and a wide range of other habitats rich in wildlife.

A variety of wildlife habitats can be found in Little Eaton parish including semi - natural grassland, semi - natural woodland, ponds, hedgerows and flowing water. A series of woodland si tes situated on old quarry workings forms an important woodland resource in the area. Semi - natural acid grassland habitat has been identified in the northeast and there may be further areas of valuable grassland habitat adjacent to the Bottle Brook.

Six L ocal Wildlife Sites are found within the parish boundary and part of the River Derwent Local Wildlife Site lies on the western boundary. The Local Wildlife Site designation is used to identify areas of land that support a substantive level of ecological in terest at a County or District level. Determining whether the ecological interest is at a high enough level to justify designation as a Local Wildlife Site is based upon a comprehensive set of guidelines drawn - up by the Derbyshire Biodiversity Partnership 1 . While it is important that these sites are recognised as some of the most important areas for wildlife in the county, it must be understood that the process of designating Local Wildlife Sites is ongoing and the identification of all of Derbyshire’s best sites for wildlife is by no means complete. Several areas within the parish boundary have the potential to meet LWS selection guidelines pending detailed surveys and so the list of Little Eaton’s Local Wildlife Sites may grow in the near future.

Several p rotected mammals have been recorded at Little Eaton. At least six different bat species have been recorded in the parish and two species have been found roosting. Otters are seen using the Derwent on the parish boundary and water voles have been recorded i n the Bottle Brook. Badger setts have been located within the parish. Owl pellets collected by a local resident in 2017 gave an insight into the variety of more common mammal species found in the area, with remains of bank voles, field voles, pygmy shrews, wood mice and common shrews all present.

Other protected species recorded in the parish include white - clawed crayfish, slow worms , grass snakes and a great crested newt. Adders have been recorded in the parish but not in the last 30 years.

Many BAP (Biodi versity Action Plan) species have also been recorded at Little Eaton, including house sparrow, song thrush, brown hare and hedgehog. It is likely that many BAP species are under - recorded in the parish and Derbyshire Wildlife Trust would welcome any records of protected or BAP species to put together a more comprehensive account of Little Eaton’s wildlife.

1 Derbyshire Local Wildlife Site Selection Guidelines Volume 2 2002 (revi sed 2011). Derbyshire Wildlife Trust

Little Eaton Canal : Proposed Green Space & Local Nature Reserve

Background

Little Eaton Canal is located adjacent to the B6179 Alfreton Road between Little Eaton Island in the south and the junction with Duffield Road in the north. The Friends of Little Eaton Canal commissioned a wildlife survey of the site on 24 th May 2017 and have since commissioned a five - year management plan for the site which is n ow in development.

Assessment

This site comprises a strip of broad - leaved woodland along a stretch of the historic Derby Canal that is now dry along much of its length. A wide grass verge lies on the east side of the canal by the main road and on the west side there is an area of grassland, scrub and bramble. Whilst none of these habitats are currently particularly species - rich when looked at individually, taken together they form a collection of habitats that provide a range of plant species and niches fo r various animal groups. This variety of habitats poses a number of opportunities for habitat enhancement that can improve the value of the area for wildlife. The management plan in development for the site focuses on the

2 different habitats and identifies at ways to maximise the benefit to a wide range of wildlife. This involves creating nesting opportunities and aiming to diversify areas dominated by just a few species so that the site becomes more attractive to a wider range of plants and animals. It is h oped that the site can be considered for Local Nature Reserve designation as it has an enthusiastic and dedicated local group committed to its management both for wildlife and for people.

The northern end of the canal is currently the most species - diverse and it holds water throughout the year. Although the canopy is in need of some tree work, it is less dense here and does let through more light to the ground flora due to its composition o f ash and crack willow. Common nettle is abundant in the field layer but a number of other woodland plants are also present and it is hoped that this number can be increased. Woodland indicator species currently present include wood avens, lords - and - ladies , lesser burdock, dog’s mercury and wood forget - me - not. A small stand of Japanese knotweed is present that requires removal through yearly treatment to prevent it from spreading further into the habitat.

The ground flora here is quite dense and mainly fo rmed of common nettle

Ash continues to be the main constituent of the canopy along the central section of the canal alongside a few specimens of sycamore, pedunculate oak, silver birch and alder. The understory is often quite diverse, with hawthorn, goat w illow, elder, field maple, rowan, hazel, wych elm and young trees from the canopy species. Again there is the need for tree work to preserve the longevity of this woodland habitat and improve its overall health and this is likely to form the majority of th e required habitat work on the site. Plants in the field layer may benefit from a greater availability of sunlight afforded through selective thinning of the woody species as currently parts of the ground are quite bare where shading is heavy. Woodland ind icator species found in this section include lords - and - ladies, male fern, dog’s mercury and hart’s - tongue fern.

Many tall crowded trees will require some arboricultural work

The southern section of the canal is more dominated by sycamore and ash is much less frequent. The shrub layer is less diverse, with hawthorn and field maple making up the bulk of the understory. This section presents opportunities to diversify both the canopy and the shrub layer, which will likely help to diversify the field layer t oo as the structure and nature of the woody component of the habitat

4 becomes more varied. Parts of this section support more wet woodland - associated species such as marsh bedstraw, water figwort and opposite - leaved golden saxifrage. Himalayan balsam is fou nd frequently in this area and will require removal from the site to prevent it from dominating and outcompeting the native ground flora.

Sycamore forms more of the canopy in this section

The grass verge on the east side between the main road and the can al is currently mown short through the summer and this is greatly limiting what could be a very valuable strip of grassland habitat. In 2018 it was noticed that a section of this grass had been left to grow and it was found to support several favourable gr assland species that were attracting a large number of butterflies, bees and other insects. It is hoped that through the creation of a management plan and the progress towards Local Nature Reserve status a much larger area of grass can be left uncut until later in the year as this will greatly boost the wildlife value of the whole canal area.

The uncut section of grassland by the main road is far more valuable for wildlife than the adjacent mown areas

The mosaic of grassland, scrub and tall herb within 50m of the western side of the canal has only been viewed in part from the footpath but offers another valuable habitat type to the canal area. It may be that part of this area can be cut annually as a grassland habitat and another area managed to develop into broad - leaved woodland to connect with that along the canal.

Part of the area west of the canal is characterised by coarse grasses and large patches of creeping thistle

Bottle Brook : Proposed Green Space

Background

The Bottle Brook is a 11.46km tributary of the River Derwent, whose source lies just south of Ripley. It flows through a number of small rural conurbations and farmland before its confluence with the River Derwent south of Little Eaton. The final 2.7km of the Bottle Brook therefore runs though the parish of Little Eaton.

The brook drains a total catchment area of 36.77km2, an area predominantly comprised of farmland and villages. The latest Water Framework Directive assessment in 2016 classified the watercourse as “Moderat e” overall. A number of poor ecological parameters are the cause of the watercourse not achieving “Good” status. Phosphate levels for the brook remain high, as a result of diffuse pollution from agricultural run - off and point source from sewage discharge, which is having a detrimental effect on the brook. River invertebrates and submerged macrophytes (aquatic plants) are also classified as “Moderate”, suggesting they are lower in abundance and contain fewer “high water quality” indicator species than expect ed for such a watercourse.

Previous ecological records show a wide diversity of wildlife present in the brook. There are fewer recent records for notable species, however, this may be a result of lower recorder effort, rather than habitat degradation.

A n umber of river invertebrates have been recorded previously that overall indicate good water quality and flow such as the mayflies, Seratella ignita, Baetis rhodani, B. vernus, Habrophlebia fusca, Paraleptophlebidae sp . and Caenis sp . the caddis flies Hydro psyche pellucidula, H. angustipennis, H. contubernalis, Tinodes waeneri, Rhyacophila dorsalis and Halesus radiatus . Other invertebrates recorded within this section of Bottle Brook include the leech Piscicola geometra and the invasive non - native isopod Cra ngonyx pseudogracilis , first recorded in 2016. The freshwater snails Theodoxus fluviatilis and the non - native Potamopyrgus antipodarum have also been found in the watercourse. Despite being non - native P. antipodarum is now widespread and abundant in U.K. watercourse, therefore it’s presence within Bottle Brook is not of concern. There are records of the native White - clawed crayfish ( Austropotamobius pallipes ) from Bottle Brook in 1991 and 1992. However, there are records of the invasive non - native Signal c rayfish ( Pacifastacus leniusculus ) from 2009. This is of great concern as, not only are they a threat to the native white - clawed crayfish, they are also damaging to many other aquatic species, such as bullhead.

Regarding fish species found within the Litt le Eaton section of Bottle Brook, Bullhead ( Cottus gobio ), which are listed in Annex II of the EC Directive on the conservation of natural habitats and flora and fauna protected species have been recorded previously. There are also historic records for bro wn trout ( Salmo trutta ), grayling ( Thymallus thymallus ) and barbel ( Barbus barbus ).

Notable mammal species that have been recorded within the locality of Little Eaton include otter ( Lutra lutra ) as recently as 2017 on the main Derwent near to the Bottle B rook confluence. Additionally, water vole ( Arvicola amphibius ) have been recorded in 2003 and 2004 in Bottle Brook within Little Eaton village itself. Both of these mammals are nationally important and protected species. The invasive non - native Mink ( Neovi son vison ) has also been recorded in 2011 within Little Eaton and more recently within the main river Derwent. This species predates on water vole, and can significantly reduce their populations and presents a significant threat to this protected species.

Additional invasive non - native species that have been recorded on the banks of Bottle Brook include the plants Japanese knotweed ( Fallopia japonica ) and Himalayan balsam ( Impatiens glandulifera ).

No notable bird species associated with aquatic habitats hav e been recorded within the Little Eaton parish, however, there are historic records for grey heron ( Ardea cinerea ) and reed bunting ( Emberiza schoeniclus ) within the surrounding riparian habitat.

Assessment

The section of Bottle Brook that flows through the parish of Little Eaton was assessed by Derbyshire Wildlife Trust’s Living Rivers Officer, Dr Scott McKenzie on July 20 th 2018 during conditions of relatively low flow. Access to the brook was from public rights of way and from along the “green way” tha t ran adjacent to the brook for much of its length through Little Eaton. Specific species surveys were not undertaken, but a habitat walkover was conducted to assess the general quality of the riparian and freshwater habitat. However, notable species were recorded and photographed .

The general character of the watercourse was a relatively narrow and shallow channel with a gravel and cobble substrate. The flow types vary from areas of smooth flow, to riffles over the cobbled sections. The banks are predomina ntly tree lined, however there are some highly modified areas. The channel is not designated as “artificial or heavily modified” by the Environment Agency, however some areas with Little Eaton are indeed heavily modified. There are a number of intermediate sized weirs, some defunct, that pose a barrier to fish movement. These are deemed passable by the majority of fish species during higher flow conditions.

The upper section of the Bottle Brook that runs through the parish north of the main village is thro ugh a hay meadow, and lined with mature alders ( Alnus glutinosa ). Access to this section was not possible, however, after visual ground assessment from the road and analysis of aerial imagery the channel seemed of natural planform, with little external pre ssure and represented a good quality habitat.

As the watercourse leaves the agricultural land it passes closer to the greenway where the canopy closes. It flows through a narrow strip of deciduous woodland and scrub where the channel becomes more canalise d and artificial with reinforced banks. The ground flora was dominated by bramble ( Rubus fruticosus ) and nettle ( Urtica dio i c a ). This strip of woodland and scrub continues along the western bank and passes alongside a number of residential properties on th e eastern bank. Bottle brook then flows close to Alfreton Road, where the channel is concrete lined, steep - sided and largely devoid of life. It is then culverted beneath Old Hall Mill Business Park. Upon emerging from the culvert, Bottle Brook flows alongs ide grazed pasture and industrial buildings before entering the main River Derwent, but still appears to have been straightened and modified.

The brook substrate was predominantly gravel and cobble therefore it could still support species of interest rec orded previously, such as bullhead and white - clawed crayfish. The banks were mostly steep sided with little marginal vegetation. This was mostly a result of the high percentage of canopy cover significantly reducing the amount of light reaching the water a nd its margins. Consequently submerged in - channel vegetation was also significantly reduced. However, sections where the channel was more open allowed submerged macrophytes to grow. For example, during the survey water crowfoot ( Ranunculus sp.) was recorde d in some sections, but this was restricted to sections of the channel with natural gravel substrate and little overhanging vegetation.

Trout were also observed in the more natural sections of Bottle Brook. No protected species were observed during the survey, however riparian habitat could be improved for species such as water vole and otter by enhancing the marginal vegetation. The wildfowl recorded during the survey was restricted to mallard (Anas platyrhynchos) and moorhen ( Gallinula chloropus ) .

Fut ure actions

Whilst the general habitat and species present in the watercourse within the Little Eaton Parish does not currently warrant designation as a local wildlife site, it does represent a valuable green space and corridor. There are, however, a numbe r of management interventions that could be made to dramatically improve the watercourse for wildlife and its quality as a green space.

The most critical of which is addressing the large amount of channel and bank modification that has been undertaken pre viously, particularly through the main village. This was most likely originally for flood alleviation purposes, however, there may be a number of opportunities to remove the hard engineering, or at least restore some natural features within it. It currentl y presents a largely inhospitable habitat for wildlife, however, some modifications would allow natural regeneration and colonisation of the channel.

During the survey it was also observed that green waste was being stored on the banks. This is likely to be inputting large amounts of unwanted nutrients into the watercourse. For this reason, local residential landowners whose land backs on to Bottle Brook should be encouraged not to store green waste close to the watercourse.

Invasive non - native species re corded during the habitat walkover comprised extensive Himalayan balsam cover of the riparian habitat. This should be controlled to prevent the further spread of the species, either through spraying with an appropriate herbicide, pulling, or “bashing”. Wit h records of signal crayfish now in the Bottle brook it is likely that they have replaced white - clawed crayfish. A targeted crayfish survey would confirm this and potentially help shape a management strategy for the species.

ER126 Drum Hill Fields, Breadsall Moor Local Wildlife Site

This site was designated for its unimproved acid grassland. A survey in 1997 updated this to semi - improved grassland but it was suggested that some adjacent fields should be considered for inclusion in the site. Secondary broad - leaved woodland is also found at this site, as well as scattered scrub and areas dominated by bracken.

A survey in 2018 found the grassland areas to be very varied in their species - diversity, with the camping areas in the east much less botanically diverse than the field in the west. The woodland habitat also varied in its species - diversity, with the strip in the north mostly dominated by silver birch and bracken and the patch of woodland further south containing a few woodland indic ator species.

Designated for:

 Unimproved acid grassland

ER022 Moor Plantation & Drum Hill Local Wildlife Site

The largest Local Wildlife Site in the parish mainly comprises secondary broad - leaved woodland and some small areas of acid grassland. The canopy is formed of a mixture of broad - leaved trees and conifers. Much of the natural character of the wood has been replaced by planted non - native trees but this site has been noted in the past for its invertebrate assemblage.

The western part of the site around the Scout Camp was visited in 2018 to assess its current value for wildlife. A quick assessment of the woodland habitat found it to support the required number of woodland indicator species to meet the LWS selection guidelines. Although the long pe riod of hot, dry weather had produced suboptimal conditions for identifying grassland species and prevented a confident conclusion to be made of the current quality of the grassland habitat, it appeared to be fairly species poor and so is unlikely to meet LWS guidelines.

Designated for:

 Secondary broad - leaved woodland  Unimproved acid grassland

ER021 Hatherings Wood Local Wildlife Site

This site comprises secondary broad - leaved woodland on old quarry workings. The canopy is largely formed of sycamore an d beech with localised pedunculate oak, sweet chestnut and ash. The shrub layer is diverse and the field layer has a good range of indicator species. Observations from the public footpath in 2018 confirm the presence of several woodland indicator species a nd it is expected that this site still holds its value for wildlife as no major management changes appear to have taken place to the habitat. A full LWS survey would be necessary to determine if this is the case.

Designated for:

 Secondary broad - leaved wood land  Reptile/amphibian assemblage

Rigga Lane : Proposed Green Space

This site supports an area of woodland habitat similar to that found at Hatherings Wood and it appears to be of a similar quality, suggesting that it may too be eligible for LWS designation pending a detailed LWS survey.

This proposed green space also contains an adjacent field that has not yet been surveyed for its current wildlife va lue. Part of this field between the two woods has recently been planted with trees to further connect the woodland habitat.

Outwoods : Proposed Green Space

A very dense area of plantation woodland is found adjacent to Rigga Lane, with a well - estab lished holly understory and a high canopy of sweet chestnut. Woodland habitat like this is very valuable for wildlife and should be preserved and managed for wildlife wherever possible. This habitat could be of LWS quality and would require a survey to det ermine its current wildlife value.

St Peter’s Park : Proposed Green Space

The wildlife value of the park is limited due to its amenity use but it does support a number of trees, hedgerows and also a small wildflower area. The main grassland area could be enhanced for wildlife whilst retaining its amenity use by leaving a margin of tall grass around the edge of the park instead of mowing up to the boundary

Croft Corner : Proposed Green Space

At the junction of Alfreton Rd and The Town there is a small area with regularly mown grassland, a hedgerow and flowerbeds. Although the grass here is currently mown too regularly to be of high value for wildlife, the tree and hedgerow provide some useful wildlife habitat and the planted flowers are likely to be providing a nectar and pollen source for pollinating insects. Selecting pollinator - friendly flowers for these flower beds will help to improve their value for wildlife.

It is understood that the int ention here is to create a new village green across the brook from Croft Corner. This area has the potential to be managed as a useful pocket of wildlife habitat located centrally in Little Eaton and this would help to bolster the line of habitats along th e Bottle Brook. Any development of this area should take this potential into consideration and look to achieve a net gain in wildlife habitat.

Village Green : Proposed Green Space

The wildlife value of the grassland at this site is fairly low as it is only very small and regularly mown. However, oak trees are one of the most beneficial tree species for wildlife and can support a huge number of species of invertebrates, lichens and mosses. A mature oak tree can therefore provide a great deal of wildli fe in a small area like this.

ER136 Eatonpark Wood Local Wildlife Site

A deciduous woodland on the site of an old quarry that comprises a canopy of sweet chestnut, sycamore, silver birch and pedunculate oak. Derbyshire Wildlife Trust holds very little information for this site as it has not been surveyed in many years. Observations from footpaths made in August 2017 revealed the presence of eight woodland indicator species in the wood (twelve indicator species would be required to meet the woodl and selection guidelines) . It is likely that a higher number of indicators is present in the wood as the view from the path only afforded a very limited assessment and the time of year would have made some indicator species much harder to find , especially from a distance. Part of th is site is formed of grassland and this would require a survey to determine if it is LWS quality . This site h as not been assessed against the current LWS guidelines.

Designated for:

 Secondary broad - leaved woodland

DE007 River Derwent Local Wildlife Site

The River Derwent forms the focal point of this Living Landscape and along its entire length a very wide range of habitat types is found. The stretch of the Derwent passing through Derby City was designated as a Local Wildlife Site and provides an important linear ecologic al feature through the city, supporting various habitats such as riparian woodland and areas of tall herb. The northern end of this Local Wildlife Site stretches into the Little Eaton parish and adds riparian habitat to the list of features that are import ant for wildlife in the parish. The river is important for many animals, including otters and birds like the kingfisher. The habitat also supports many marginal and emergent plants that provide food, breeding habitat and shelter for invertebrates.

Designat ed for:

 Flowing water rivers and streams

ER013 Peckwash Mills Local Wildlife Site

Situated on the banks of the River Derwent, this site comprises a former mill and sluices and was originally designated for a number of different habitat types . Since the d esignation the site has undergone significant changes with the renovation of the mill and so it is not currently known whether these habitats are still present and whether they meet the current LWS selection guidelines. The site therefore requires resurvey ing to determine which areas are still of LWS quality and to update the ecological information on the site.

Designated for:

 Secondary broad - leaved woodland  Flowing water rivers and streams  Wet grassland

ER019 Camp Wood Local Wildlife Site

Camp Wood is formed of regenerating birch woodland that has not been surveyed since 1992. It is likely that the wood has begun to diversify through natural succession and the other woody species that were only found to be occasional in 1992 may now be more abundant. This site requires a resurvey to assess the woodland habitat against the Local Wildlife Site guidelines.

Designated for:

 Secondary broad - leaved woodland

Grasslands of potential interest

A number of grassland areas have been mapped as supporting what could be species - rich semi - natural grassland habitat. The species diversity of these areas is not known and they could support a diverse range of plant species that may meet grassland LWS selection guidelines. Survey s at an appropriate time of year would be required to determine the current wildlife value o f these fields .

P ollinators and grassland strips

The decline of pollinating insects and the importance of pollination for wildlife, the economy and our health and wellbeing have all been covered by the media in recent years. This is an issue affecting much of the planet and the current trends paint a bleak and worrying picture of the future if these declines are to continue. In the UK we have lost a huge amount of pollinator habitat in rec ent decades. In England and Wales around 97% of species - rich grassland has disappeared since the Second World War. This habitat ty pe is crucial for healthy populations of bees, butterflies and other invertebrates that pollinate our wild plants and crops. T he advent of neonicotinoid pesticide use brought another very serious threat, the true s cale of which we cannot yet determine.

Improving habitat for pollinators need not be expensive or difficult. Sometimes it can be as simple as mowing some grass later in the year than would normally be done. Even small patches of grass with a few dandelions can be useful if left to grow. In many areas of the county , managing grass verges and open spaces to look “neat and tidy” is seriously limiting the wildlife value of what could be useful pockets and strips of interconnected habitat spreading through urban areas. Recent studies have shown that urban environments now have a higher species richness of bees than farmland and so the importance of bringing wildlife habitat i nto built areas is clear 2 . The parish of Little Eaton has an opportunity to contribute to pollinator conservation if grass cutting can be left until later in the year wherever it is safe to do so. Some areas of grassland can even be cut once every two or t hree years so that they provide hibernation habitat for bumblebees and cover for other invertebrates and small mammals. Encouraging the planting of good sources of nectar and pollen in gardens can also help to make the area more pollinator - friendly. Derbys hire Wildlife Trust would be happy to advise on the best plant species for pollinators and where altered cutting regimes would make a difference .

2 Baldock KCR, Goddard MA, Hicks DM, et al. Where is the UK’s pollinator biodiversity? The importance of urban areas for flower - visiting insects. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences . 2015;282(1803):2 0142849. doi:10.1098/rspb.2014.2849.

Appendix 9: Little Eaton Neighbourhood Plan: Proposed Local Green Spaces - Supporting Evidence

JULY 2018

Context

This supporting paper explains the background to the designation of Local Green Spaces in the draft Little Eaton Neighbourhood Development Plan. It sets out the background to Local Green Spaces and explains the methodology used.

Policy Context

The National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF)1 introduced the concept of Local Green Space (LGS) designation. LGS designation is a way to provide special protection against development for green areas of importance to local communities.

Section 76 of the NPPF provides the following information on Local Green Space designations: “Local communities through local and neighbourhood plans should be able to identify for special protection green areas of particular importance to them. By designating land as Local Green Space local communities will be able to rule out new development other than in very special circumstances. Identifying land as Local Green Space should therefore be consistent with the local planning of sustainable development and complement investment in sufficient homes, jobs and other essential services”. Adding, “Local Green Space designation will not be appropriate for most green areas or open space”.

Additional guidance is provided in the National Planning Practice Guidance section on “open space, sports and recreation facilities, public rights of way and local green space”.

The identification and protection of local green spaces through Neighbourhood Plans is also supported through local planning policies. Special mention here should be made to criterion 4 of Policy 16: Green Infrastructure, Parks and Open Space of the Adopted Erewash Core Strategy (2014)2’, which states, “Parks and Open Space should be protected from development and deficiencies should be addressed in Local Development Documents. Exceptions may be made if the park or open space is shown to be underused or undervalued, the development is a small part of the Green Infrastructure network and will not be detrimental to its function, or the development is a use associated with parks and open spaces”. The process for the identification of Local Green Spaces

Whilst the NPPF establishes the concept of LGS designation and provides some guiding principles, it gives local communities preparing a Neighbourhood Plan some discretion to determine how to implement this at the local level. A four-stage approach was adopted by the Neighbourhood Plan Steering Group. Step 1: Identification of potential spaces.

1 https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/6077/2116950.pdf 2 https://www.erewash.gov.uk/media/files/Final_Core_Strategy_-_Version_for_Website.pdf Little Eaton Neighbourhood Plan Proposed Local Green Spaces July 2018 2

The potential sites were derived from local knowledge including the outcomes from the community consultation events. Step 2: Assessment against the NPPF criteria The sites were then assessed to consider their suitability for LGS designation. To allow comparative assessment of the sites, a form was created based on the criteria in the NPPF. This enabled a consistent and transparent methodology for identifying LGSs. Each potential site was assessed. The Group, like most groups undertaking LGS analysis, faced challenges. In particular, the sheer number of potential local green spaces of some significance in the Parish. National planning policy enables a local plan to protect those of local significance. In addition, the absence of a statutory or commonly used definition of these terms, particularly what constitutes, ‘special’ or comprises an ‘extensive tract of land’. A common-sense approach was taken, while at the same take having regard to good practice and the experiences of LGS designations in approved neighbourhood plans. The Group were also mindful of the fact that several sites are already given some protection by virtue of being Green Belt. In the Green Belt, development is strictly controlled and there is a strong planning emphasis on keeping land permanently open. National Planning Practice Guidance on LGS designation suggests that where land is already protected by another designation consideration should be given as to whether any additional local benefit would be gained by designation as such. Throughout the process, the Steering Group sought and obtained specialist advice from bodies such as the Derbyshire Wildlife Trustand the consultants helping them prepare the Neighbourhood Plan. Consideration has also been given to specialist studies and reports such as the ‘Open Space, Sport and Recreation Report’3 prepared by Erewash Borough Council in October 2006 and which looked at formal open space provision across the Borough. Through this process, a small number of sites were identified which were considered to be locally significant, valued by the community and satisfied the tests set out in the NPPF to meet the test to be designated as a LGS. Step 4: Consultation Satisfied that the sites met, in principle, the criteria for LGS designation and should be formally proposed for designation in the Neighbourhood Plan, they were then “tested” through the Plan process. A key milestone was when the proposed sites were set out for comment at the drop-in events held as part of the Little Eaton Carnival in July 2018

3 https://www.erewash.gov.uk/media/files/CD52_-_Erewash_PPG17_Audit_Assessment.pdf Little Eaton Neighbourhood Plan Proposed Local Green Spaces July 2018 3

Code 1 Site St Peters Park Address/location Duffield Road, Little Eaton Description Sports Club with adjacent sports field and other sports facilities in the middle of a residential area. Open grassed playing field surrounded by low stone walls and established trees in part and mainly quiet roads on East,South and North sides. The village hall lies within grounds. Photo

Compliance with National Planning Policy Framework Public Access Yes, centrally located in the village it can be accessed from several points on the periphery. Is it in close proximity to the Yes.It is within the built-up part of Little Eaton. community it would serve? i.e. within 400m Does the site have local Yes. The largest amenity space in the Parish, it is used for a significance? variety of informal (e.g. walking and seating) and formal (cricket, football. tennis and crown green bowling etc.) recreation uses. It also includes an equipped children’s play area. It is well used and a focal point for the community (the annual Little Eaton Carnival takes place there). The Village Hall lies within it. Is it beautiful? It is attractive and provides visual amenity to local residents. It is important to the character and setting of the village. Does it have historic Yes, long standing recreation area. significance? Does it have recreation value? Yes, both formal (e.g. cricket pitches etc.) and informal (e.g. including playing fields, walking and seating). Very well used. in/formal Is it tranquil? Is it a peaceful To some extent. It is relatively tranquil. place away from noise and bustle Does the site have wildlife Limited – some trees and hedges mainly on the edge of the value? Biodiversity? site. Is the site local in character? Yes (i.e. serves local community and not extensive) Does site contribute to LP No. strategic requirements for provision of homes, employment or services? Little Eaton Neighbourhood Plan Proposed Local Green Spaces July 2018 4

Other It was specifically identified as an important amenity open space in Erewash Borough Council’s ‘Open Space, Sport and Recreation Report’4 (October 2006).

Code 2 Site Bottle Brook Green Space Address/location Runs through the village parallel to the Alfreton Road Description A stream bordered by trees and green spaces for much of its length and including the proposed Little Eaton Greenway on the Western side Parts of it have been contained by concrete walls (to prevent flooding). Other parts are in natural woods and fields. Photo

Compliance with National Planning Policy Framework Public Access Access available via the parallel Greenway throughout most of the village Is it in close proximity to the Yes. The brook runs through the middle of the village community it would serve? I.e. within 400m Does the site have local Yes. It has recently been regarded as a potential source of significance? flooding. Before it was enclosed, it snaked through the centre of the village with cottages and a public house on its banks. Is it beautiful? It has the potential of becoming a very attractive focal point for the village. It is important to the character of the village. Does it have historic Yes. Three mills (Stanley’s Corn Mill, The Bleach Mill and one significance? of the Tempest Mills) were based on the brook. Does it have recreation value? Not currently. It has the potential of becoming a pleasant place including playing fields, to congregate. in/formal

4 https://www.erewash.gov.uk/media/files/CD52_-_Erewash_PPG17_Audit_Assessment.pdf Little Eaton Neighbourhood Plan Proposed Local Green Spaces July 2018 5

Is it tranquil? Is it a peaceful Yes. Parts of it are very secluded. place away from noise and bustle Does the site have wildlife Yes. The brook is the habitat for many fish, crustaceans, value? Biodiversity? mammals, birds and insects. (See Appendix 8) Is the site local in character? The brook is part of an ecosystem which extends northwards (i.e. serves local community to Kilburn and beyond and flows into the Derwent (a Wildlife and not extensive) Trust “Living Landscape” to the south. Does site contribute to LP No strategic requirements for provision of homes, employment or services? Other The Plan proposes that the brook should be gradually opened up to become an attractive central feature of the village.

Code 3 Site Croft Corner Address/location On the corner of Alfreton Road and The Town Description A pleasant garden of approximately 15 metres by 15 metres with seating Photo

Compliance with National Planning Policy Framework Public Access Yes. Is it in close proximity to the Yes, at the centre of the Village. community it would serve? I.e. within 400m Does the site have local It is highly valued and used by residents. It is a local landmark significance? and focal point which is important to the identity and Little Eaton’s sense of place. It prominent location adds to its value and importance. Is it beautiful? Very. It is maintained by an active “Little Eaton in Bloom” group who have created the garden. It was re-furbished in 2018 with new stone walls and raised beds. Does it have historic No significance?

Little Eaton Neighbourhood Plan Proposed Local Green Spaces July 2018 6

Does it have recreation value? Yes. It acts as a gathering place for residents of the village. including playing fields, in/formal Is it tranquil? Is it a peaceful Although it is in the centre of the village next to two busy roads, place away from noise and it is placed slightly apart from them. It is a pleasant place to bustle sit. Does the site have wildlife It adjoins the brook which has abundant wildlife. value? Biodiversity? Is the site local in character? It is not extensive now (i.e. serves local community and not extensive) Does site contribute to LP It has the potential of becoming the focal point for the whole strategic requirements for village. provision of homes, employment or services? Other The Plan proposes that this area is extended across Bottle Brook (to join the greenway) and onto part of the Mill Green Site where additional community facilities(including some green car parking spaces) should be created.

Code 4 Site Hatherings and Hieron’s wood Address/location On both sides of Vicarage Lane Description An extensive disused quarry lying on both sides of Vicarage Lane, now surrounded by woods Photo

Compliance with National Planning Policy Framework Public Access Vicarage Lane is partly public and partly private road and a public footpath. Another public footpath traverses the woods along the route of a disused tramway. Is it in close proximity to the Yes community it would serve? I.e. within 400m Does the site have local Its value is reflected by the number of footpaths that have been significance? extensively used by walkers for generations and continue to be loved by them. Is it beautiful? Yes. The woods are carpeted by bluebells, celandine, garlic and snowdrops in the spring. The trees are now mature and provide an impressive setting Little Eaton Neighbourhood Plan Proposed Local Green Spaces July 2018 7

Does it have historic Yes. A defrocked Prior, John Hieron made his home in the significance? area. The quarries were a major source of work for local residents throughout the 18th and 19th century. Outram’s horse drawn tramway joined the site the tramway and canal in the valley Does it have recreation value? For walkers and nature lovers, yes including playing fields, in/formal Is it tranquil? Is it a peaceful Yes place away from noise and bustle Does the site have wildlife Part of the site is a Local Wildlife site monitored by the Wildlife value? Biodiversity? trust.(See Appendix 8) Is the site local in character? It is an extensive site use by the local community and beyond (i.e. serves local community and not extensive) Does site contribute to LP No strategic requirements for provision of homes, employment or services? Other Part of a belt of wildlife sites to the north of the village

Code 5 Site Outwoods Green Space Address/location Off Rigga Lane Description A disused quarry and surrounding woods Photo

Compliance with National Planning Policy Framework Public Access The site is privately owned. A public footpath runs nearby. Is it in close proximity to the No community it would serve? I.e. within 400m Does the site have local No significance? Is it beautiful? Yes Does it have historic The site was owned by various important local families significance? including William Woollat (who along with Jedediah Strutt and Richard Arkwright was an important figure in the Industrial revolution). Does it have recreation value? No including playing fields, in/formal Little Eaton Neighbourhood Plan Proposed Local Green Spaces July 2018 8

Is it tranquil? Is it a peaceful Yes place away from noise and bustle Does the site have wildlife Yes. It is designated as a Local Wildlife Site. See Appendix 8 value? Biodiversity? Is the site local in character? No (i.e. serves local community and not extensive) Does site contribute to LP No strategic requirements for provision of homes, employment or services? Other This site and the other disused quarries form a belt of wildlife sites to the north of the village.

Code 6 Site The Village Green Address/location Duffield Road Description A small triangle of grass in with an oak tree and seating Photo

Compliance with National Planning Policy Framework Public Access Yes. It is situated on the corner of Duffield Road and Station Road Is it in close proximity to the Yes. community it would serve? I.e. within 400m Does the site have local Yes. It provides for a very pleasant and relatively quiet area significance? that is an essential feature of the setting for the listed buildings nearby and to the character of the wider area. Is it beautiful? Yes. Does it have historic It was created in 1887 to mark the golden jubilee of Queen significance? Victoria. Does it have recreation value? As a gathering place for local people with a seat around the including playing fields, oak tree. in/formal

Little Eaton Neighbourhood Plan Proposed Local Green Spaces July 2018 9

Is it tranquil? Is it a peaceful No. place away from noise and bustle Does the site have wildlife No. value? Biodiversity? Is the site local in character? It is only used by local people (i.e. serves local community and not extensive) Does site contribute to LP No strategic requirements for provision of homes, employment or services? Other Although small and unimposing, this area forms a useful place for residents to gather.

Code 7 Site Little Eaton branch of Derby Canal (Proposed Local Nature Reserve and Green Space) Address/location Between the Alfreton Road and the Railway line. Description A disused canal, now being developed as a nature reserve, stretching half a mile northwards from the Little Eaton roundabout on the A38 and 50 metres west from the Alfreton Road.

Compliance with National Planning Policy Framework Public Access Yes. The Alfreton Road and a cycle path to the east and a public footpath to the west. Is it in close proximity to the Yes. It is about 700 metres to the nearest point from the community it would serve? I.e. village centre within 400m Does the site have local Yes. A group of residents (“Friends of the Little Eaton significance? Canal”) have been working, for several years, on a project aimed at developing the site. Is it beautiful? Yes. Does it have historic Yes. The canal was created in the 19th century – opened in significance? 1893 and acted as a transport hub to the north until it closed in 1908. Does it have recreation value? It has the potential of becoming a wildlife site for use by the including playing fields, village school and local residents. The footpaths have the in/formal potential as bridleways for use by cyclists and horse riders for residents and the wider community. It adds to connectivity.

Little Eaton Neighbourhood Plan Proposed Local Green Spaces July 2018 10

Is it tranquil? Is it a peaceful Yes. Although bordered by Alfreton Road, the trees screen place away from noise and out most of the noise. bustle Does the site have wildlife It is the habitat for a wide range of insects, birds, mammals value? Biodiversity? and crustaceans See Appendix 8 Is the site local in character? It is an important local feature for local walkers. The cycle (i.e. serves local community path is used as a route into Derby. and not extensive) Does site contribute to LP A mobile home park, van hire business, demolition firm, strategic requirements for landfill site and Severn Trent Water Authority filter beds are provision of homes, situated to the west of the site. The site itself is not suitable. employment or services? Other The Plan proposes that this site should become a Local Nature Reserve. Lying at the approach to the village from Derby, it forms a green gateway to it; is an important resource for walkers and cyclists and a sanctuary for many forms of wildlife.

Code 8 Site Drum Hill Green Space Address/location To the north of Morley lane Description This hill is owned by the Scout movement and is used by local and regional groups for camping and other activities. Photo

Compliance with National Planning Policy Framework Public Access Yes. A public footpath runs to the south of the site. Is it in close proximity It is about 2 miles from the village. to the community it would serve? I.e. within 400m Does the site have Yes, particularly for local Scout and Guide groups local significance? Is it beautiful? Yes Does it have historic Part of the site is a storage tank for the waterworks, first used for this significance? purpose about a century ago Does it have Yes. It is widely used by Scouts and Guides. recreation value?

Little Eaton Neighbourhood Plan Proposed Local Green Spaces July 2018 11

including playing fields, in/formal Is it tranquil? Is it a When the scouts and guides are not there, it can be tranquil. peaceful place away from noise and bustle Does the site have Yes. It is a Local Wildlife Site, monitored by the Derbyshire Wildlife wildlife value? Trust. See Appendix 8 Biodiversity? Is the site local in No character? (i.e. serves local community and not extensive) Does site contribute No to LP strategic requirements for provision of homes, employment or services? Other

Code 9 Site Moor Lane Green Space Address/location Moor Lane (off Alfreton Road) Description A disused quarry and surrounding woods Photo

Compliance with National Planning Policy Framework Public Access Moor Lane is a public footpath and bridleway Is it in close proximity to the Yes community it would serve? I.e. within 400m Does the site have local No significance? Is it beautiful? Parts of the site, above the quarries are beautiful. Two builder’s yards adjacent to Moor lane have spoilt part of th site Little Eaton Neighbourhood Plan Proposed Local Green Spaces July 2018 12

Does it have historic The quarries were important places of work for local significance? labour for centuries Does it have recreation value? No including playing fields, in/formal Is it tranquil? Is it a peaceful Yes place away from noise and bustle Does the site have wildlife It falls between two designated local wildlife sites. The value? Biodiversity? wildlife value of this site lies in its position as a bridge between Drum Hill and the other quarries and woods. It is part of a belt of wildlife habitats for birds and mammals to the north of the village Is the site local in character? No (i.e. serves local community and not extensive) Does site contribute to LP The quarries are now the location for two builders yards strategic requirements for and some private homes. provision of homes, employment or services? Other

Code 10 Site Rigga Lane Green Space Address/location Rigga Lane (off Eaton Bank) Description A disused quarry with woods over about 6 acres, owned privately. A cottage is situated at the base of the quarry. Photo

Compliance with National Planning Policy Framework Public Access A public footpath passes through this site NO? Is it in close proximity to the It lies close to part of the village, about a mile away from community it would serve? I.e. the centre within 400m Does the site have local Yes. It is much used by dog walkers. significance? Is it beautiful? Yes. There are swathes of bluebells and other flowers in the Spring and glorious mature trees throughout the year. Does it have historic The quarry has been used since Roman times. It was significance? extensively used in the 18th and 19th centuries. It was Little Eaton Neighbourhood Plan Proposed Local Green Spaces July 2018 13

joined to the other quarries in the parish by Outram’s tramway. Does it have recreation value? Much used by walkers. It is part of the trail from Derby to including playing fields, Matlock and up to Ladybower. in/formal Is it tranquil? Is it a peaceful Yes. The railway can be heard in the distance. place away from noise and bustle Does the site have wildlife It is designated as a site of Regional Geological value? Biodiversity? Importance and a Local Wildlife Site (Appendix 8) Is the site local in character? The footpath is part of the Derwent valley trail to Matlock (i.e. serves local community and Ladybower and not extensive) Does site contribute to LP No strategic requirements for provision of homes, employment or services? Other Part of a belt of wildlife sites to the north of the village

Little Eaton Neighbourhood Plan Proposed Local Green Spaces July 2018

Little Eaton Neighbourhood Plan Local Business Survey J une 2018

Key Findings

June 2018

1.0 Introduction

1.1 Background The Little Eaton Neighbourhood Plan Steering Group conducted a survey of local businesses in March 2018 to support the development of the Little Eaton Neighbourhood Plan. Neighbourhood Plans represent a new planning mechanism which provides communities with the opportunity to shape the future of their locality. Obtaining views of the local community is key when preparing a Neighbourhood Plan. The questionnaire was aimed at: . Understanding the concerns of the business community in relation to future development. . Understanding the key policy areas on which the Neighbourhood Plan should focus. . Understand ing the type of businesses that operate. This report outlines the key findings of the research.

1.2 Key Findings 2.0 Methodology A questionnaire, approximately 5 - 10 minutes in length, was designed by the Steering Group. Paper copies of the questionnaire were distributed by the Steering Group to members of the business community who attended a business forum meeting held on March 9 th , 2018 at local business KC Jones a s well as directly to business in the Parish. Completed questionnaires were returned to members of the Steering Group.

3.0 Response and Analysis There were 17 respondents to the questionnaire. This is considered to be a good return rate especially given the limited number of business es that are based in the Parish. The survey consisted of a mixture of ‘open’ and ‘closed’ questions. All printed survey responses were input to the online system (Survey Money) for data analysis.

4.0 Results Q .1 How long has your business been operating in Little Eaton?

There was a broad spread ranging from less than 1 year to 33 years. One respondent indicated that they were not based in the Parish but were considering moving to it.

Q.2 How many people does the business employ?

The most popular response was 50 - 99 with 29% (5 responses), followed by 0 - 4 and 20 - 49, (both 4 responses)

Q.3 Where do your staff live? LITTLE EATON NEIGHBO URHOOD PLAN – SUMMAR Y OF RESULTS FROM SU RVEY OF BUSINESSES JUNE 2 018

Over half (65% or 11) stated that some of their staff live in Little Eaton. 24% (or 4) of respondents stated that no staff live in Little Eaton and 2 or 12% all staff live in Little Eaton.

Q.4 To what extent are the following, important reasons for being based in Little Eaton?

There were 16 respondents to this question. The most frequent responses were Close to Where You Live, Good Transport Links and Affordable Premises, each with 5 respondents stating that it was very important. The least popular response was Proximity to Suppliers then Proximity to Customers.

Q.5 What are your future business plans?

10 or 58% of responses foresaw no change. 6 or 35% planned to expand. On e planned to relocate, and another responded ‘Other ’ but did not specify the reasons for this.

Q.6 What barriers or constraints prevents businesses moving to Little Eaton or existing businesses expanding? Please specify .e.g. car parking availability, traf fic, broadband speed, availability of suitable buildings etc .

A wide variety of reasons were stated. The most common (i.e. mentioned more than twice) were transport/access issue; car parking; availability of suitable premises and broadband.

Q.7 What will help your business to develop and thrive over the next 10 years? Please list up to five in priority order. e.g. better transport links, improved access, bigger site, extension to home working office or workshop space

B etter transport links wa s the dominant theme followed by better or bigger sites and improved broadband.

Q.8 What land and property will your business require over the next 10 years? (Please tick all that apply) .

The most popular responses was a bigger site together with more storage, parking space and modern higher standard building with 6 responses, followed by on - site redevelopment to a high standard and no change with 5 responses. The least popular was smaller site/property with one response.

Q.9 Are there any ot her businesses that the Plan could encourage to locate in Little Eaton that may complement your business? For example, improve the village footfall, use your waste or your products etc.?

Of the 11 respondents, Tourism, Leisure and Crafts was the most popul ar response (6), followed by Community Services (5) and Pubs, Restaurants and Cafes (4).

Q.10 Should employment sites be protected from changes of use?

LITTLE EATON NEIGHBO URHOOD PLAN – SUMMAR Y OF RESULTS FROM SU RVEY OF BUSINESSES JUNE 2 018

42% (7) respondents answered No. 5 or 29% answered Yes, and 5 or 29% Did Not Know.

Q.11 If you have o ther comments about business activity in Little Eaton, please provide them in the space below.

One respondent considered that “ A clear commercial zone is evident to the south of the village which should be encouraged to reduce impact on the expansion elsewhere ”.

Q.12 To help us understand the range of existing businesses in Little Eaton, please tick the box that best describes the nature of your business.

A wide and diverse range of responses were received. Building and Construction was mentioned most times (3), followed by Manufacturing and Engineering (2) and Professional Services (2).

LITTLE EATON NEIGHBO URHOOD PLAN – SUMMAR Y OF RESULTS FROM SU RVEY OF BUSINESSES JUNE 2 018

Statement of Basic Little Eaton Conditions Neighbourhood Plan 2018-2033

January 2019

Contents

1.0 Introduction……………………………………………………………...3

2.0 Legal Requirements……………………….…………………………...4

3.0 The Basic Conditions…………………………………………………..5

4.0 Conclusion……………………………………………………………..16

Little Eaton Neighbourhood Plan – Statement of Basic Conditions

1.0 Introduction

1.1 The Basic Conditions Statement has been prepared to accompany the Little Eaton Neighbourhood Plan (“the Plan”) under regulation 15 of the Neighbourhood Planning (General) Regulations 2012 (“the Regulations”).

1.2 In order to satisfy Regulation 15 of the Neighbourhood Planning (General) Regulations 2012, the Parish Council, as the ‘qualifying body’ must include a statement explaining how the proposed neighbourhood plan meets the requirements of paragraph 8 of Schedule 4B to the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 (as amended).

1.3 Paragraph 8 (1) states that the examiner must consider the following: 1 whether the draft neighbourhood development plan meets the basic conditions (see sub-paragraph (2)) 2 whether the draft neighbourhood development plan complies with the provision made by or under sections 61E (2), 61J and 61L, as amended by s38C(5)(b) 3 whether the area for any referendum should extend beyond the neighbourhood area to which the draft neighbourhood development plan relates and 4 such other matters as may be prescribed. 1.4 Paragraph 8 (2) states that a draft neighbourhood development plan meets the basic conditions if: (a) having regard to national policies and advice contained in guidance issued by the Secretary of State, it is appropriate to make the neighbourhood development plan (b) the making of the neighbourhood development plan contributes to the achievement of sustainable development (c) the making of the neighbourhood development plan is in general conformity with the strategic policies contained in the development plan for the area of the authority (or any part of that area) (d) the making of the neighbourhood development plan does not breach, and is otherwise compatible with, EU obligations and (e) prescribed conditions are met in relation to the neighbourhood development plan and prescribed matters have been complied with in connection with the proposal for the neighbourhood development plan.

Little Eaton Neighbourhood Plan – Statement of Basic Conditions

1.4 Section 2 of this Statement sets out how the Plan complies with the legal requirements of sub-paragraphs 1 (b), (c) and (d). Section 3 of this Statement sets out how the Plan meets the basic conditions contained in sub-paragraph 1 (a) and sub-paragraph 2.

2.0 Legal Requirements

2.1 The Plan complies with the provisions of sub-paragraph 1(b) as described below. The Plan is being submitted by a qualifying body 2.2 The Plan has been submitted by Little Eaton Parish Council, which is a qualifying body and entitled to submit a Neighbourhood Plan for the designated Plan Area. What is being proposed is a neighbourhood plan 2.3 The Plan contains policies relating to the development and use of land within the Plan area and has been prepared in accordance with the statutory requirements and processes set out in the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 (as amended by the Localism Act 2011) and the Neighbourhood Planning Regulations 2012. The proposed neighbourhood plan states the period for which it is to have effect 2.4 The Plan states that the period which it relates to is from 2018 until 2033. The policies do not relate to excluded development 2.5 The Plan does not deal with county matters (mineral extraction and waste development), nationally significant infrastructure or any other matters set out in Section 61K of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990. The County Council was consulted as part of the Regulation 14 consultation and did not raise any concerns that the Plan is not compatible with the existing adopted Derbyshire Minerals Local Plan. The proposed Neighbourhood Plan does not relate to more than one neighbourhood plan area and there are no other neighbourhood plans in place within the Neighbourhood Plan area. 2.6 The designated Plan area was approved by Erewash Borough Council in July 2017. The Plan does not relate to more than one neighbourhood plan area. There are no other neighbourhood plans in place within the Neighbourhood Plan area. 2.7 In relation to sub-paragraph 1(c), it is not considered that there is any benefit or reason for extending the area for the referendum beyond the designated Neighbourhood Plan Area.

Little Eaton Neighbourhood Plan – Statement of Basic Conditions

2.8 In relation to sub-paragraph 1(d), there are no other prescribed matters.

3.0 The Basic Conditions

3.1 This section addresses how the Plan fulfils the basic conditions set out in sub- paragraph (2). The Plan has been prepared having regard to national policies and advice set out in the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF 2012) and to the strategic policies contained in the Erewash Core Strategy 2011- 2018 (Adopted March 2014) and the Erewash Local Plan Saved Policies 2005 (amended 2014). 3.3 Detail of how the Plan is in general conformity with the Approved policies in the Core Strategy and Local Plan is provided in table 2. Having regard to national policies and advice 3.4 The Plan has been developed having regard to the NPPF. The NPPF was published in March 2012 and revised in July 2018 and sets out the government’s planning policies for England and how these are expected to be applied. The policies of the previous Framework apply for the purpose of examining plans, where submitted on or before 24 January 2019. An explanation of how each of the Plan planning policies has shown regard to the NPPF 2012 is outlined in table 1 below.

Neighbourhood Plan Key NPPF Ref Commentary Policies (para.) BE1: HOUSING Para 16, 79 The Policy is in full accordance with the PROVISION NPPF. It seeks to support the strategic . housing development needs as set out in the Core Strategy, directing housing development to the most sustainable locations. BE2: HOUSING MIX Para 50 The Policy seeks to support a mix of housing that meets an identified need in the community. The NPPF advocates for inclusive and mixed communities, which will require a mix of housing types based on current and future demographic trends. BE3: GOOD DESIGN Para 42, 58 – 60. 94 The Policy outlines several design principles and supports the NPPF principle of requiring good design; and the need to respond to local character and history of the local surroundings. The policy supports measures aimed at mitigating the risk of flooding, as supported by the NPPF Little Eaton Neighbourhood Plan – Statement of Basic Conditions

BE4: CHARACTER Para 17, 126, 127 & These policies seek to identify, protect BUILDINGS AND 135 and enhance non-designated and STRUCTURES OF designated heritage assets. These LOCAL HERITAGE policies have regard to a core NPPF INTEREST principle and aim to ‘conserve and BE5: ALFRETON enhance the historic environment’. ROAD SPECIAL CHARACTER AREA BE7: DEVELOPER Para 173. The prioritisation of projects funded CONTRIBUTIONS through developer contributions has regard to the NPPF in terms of ensuring viability and deliverability. LF1: PROTECTION OF Para 28 & 70 This Policy seeks to protect key COMMUNITY community facilities. This has regard for FACILITIES the NPPF principle of promoting healthy LF2: ENHANCEMENT communities through amongst other OF COMMUNITY things, planning positively for community FACILITIES facilities and guarding against their unnecessary loss LF3: LITTLE EATON Para 70 The Policy supports the NFFF aims of VILLAGE CENTRE ‘plan positively for the provision and use of shared space, community facilities (such as local shops, meeting places, sports venues, cultural buildings, public houses and places of worship) and other local services’ and ‘ensure that established shops, facilities and services are able to develop and modernise in a way that is sustainable, and retained for the benefit of the community’. LF5: FOOTPATHS Para 30 & 75 This Policy aims to protect and enhance AND CYCLEWAYS the existing cycle and pedestrian network. In doing so, it has regard to, and supports the NPPF, in terms of ‘promoting sustainable transport’, reducing congestion and greenhouse gas emissions and ‘promoting healthy communities’. POLICY LF6: TOURISM Para 21& 28 The Policy in supporting suitable development proposals for tourism recognises the role that the Parish can play in ‘building a strong, competitive economy’ and ‘supporting a prosperous rural economy’ through sustainable rural tourism and leisure developments.’

Little Eaton Neighbourhood Plan – Statement of Basic Conditions

POLICY NE1: Para 109, 117 &118 These policies seek to protect and BIODIVERSITY enhance local biodiversity features and habitats. They have regard to the NPPF, POLICY NE2: DARK which states that the planning system SKIES should contribute to enhancing the natural and local environment by minimizing impacts on biodiversity and providing net gains where possible. POLICY NE4: BOTTLE BROOK

POLICY NE5: LOCAL Para 76 & 77 Protection of Local Green Spaces GREEN SPACES identified as being special by the community through Neighbourhood Plans is advocated through the NPPF. Proposed designations meet the criteria set out in the NPPF. POLICY NE6: TREES Para 117 &118 The Policy in its aims to protect and enhance trees has regard to the NPPF, specifically, the need to conserve or enhance biodiversity and encourage opportunities for its incorporation in and around development. POLICY B1: PROTECT Para 21, 28, 37 This Policy seeks to protect sustainable EMPLOYMENT USES employment sites through the retention of buildings that provide or have the potential to provide employment opportunities. This has regard to the NPPF aims of ‘building a strong competitive economy’ and ‘support economic growth in rural areas’. POLICY B2: DUFFIELD Para 21, 28, 37 These policies seek to support and ROAD SITE enhance the role of these sites as local centres for business and employment. POLICY B3: OUTRAMS This is in accordance with the NPPF’s aim WHARF SITE of ‘to promote a strong rural economy, local and neighbourhood plans should: POLICY B4: OLD HALL support the sustainable growth and MILL BUSINESS PARK expansion of all types of business and enterprise in rural areas’.

Little Eaton Neighbourhood Plan – Statement of Basic Conditions

Achieving sustainable development

3.5 The Plan is positively prepared, reflecting the presumption in the NPPF in favour of sustainable development, but it seeks to manage development to ensure that, in addition to economic considerations, reasonable environmental and social considerations are taken into account. 3.6 Whilst there is no legal requirement for a neighbourhood plan to have a sustainability appraisal, this section of the Statement demonstrates how the Plan fulfils the basic condition that the plan contributes to achieving sustainable development. 3.7 The NPPF defines sustainable development as having three dimensions; economic, social and environmental. The Plan has been developed with regard to these principles and has jointly sought environmental, economic and social gains. 3.8 The policies contained in the Plan contribute to achieving sustainable development by seeking positive improvements to the quality of the natural, built and historic environment, as well as in people’s quality of life The social goals of the Plan include:

• Support housing to meet the needs of the local people, including affordable new starter homes and retirement homes and safeguarding and enhancing important open spaces, community facilities; improved opportunities to enjoy the countryside and travel safely around the Parish; and develop and implement a plan to enhance the village centre.

The environmental goals include:

• Protect and enhance biodiversity; minimise the noise and air pollution from the A38 through the construction of man-made and natural barriers; the identify and protect the most important local green spaces and promote, restore and conserve important trees and hedgerows.

The economic goals include:

• Enhancing business parks at Duffield Road, Outrams Wharf and Old Hall Mills.

General conformity with the strategic policies of the development plan for the area 3.9 The Plan has been developed in general conformity with the strategic policies contained in the Erewash Core Strategy 2011-2028 (adopted in 2014) and the Erewash Local Plan Saved Policies 2005 (amended 2014). To meet the basic conditions, the Plan is only required to demonstrate general conformity with the adopted Local Plan.

Little Eaton Neighbourhood Plan – Statement of Basic Conditions

3.10 Table 2 provides a summary of how each of the Plan policies is in general conformity with the strategic policies in the Erewash Core Strategy adopted in 2014 and the Erewash Local Plan Saved Policies 2005 (amended 2014).

Little Eaton Neighbourhood Plan – Statement of Basic Conditions

Neighbourhood Plan Erewash Core Strategy (2011-2028) and Commentary Policies Erewash Local Plan Saved Policies (2014) BE1: HOUSING Policy 2 of the Core Strategy ‘The Spatial Strategy’ Policy BE1 supports this Policy as it seeks to direct new PROVISION provides for a minimum of 6,250 new homes (2011 housing development away from the Green Belt to within the to 2028) across the Erewash Borough. The vast . built framework of Little Eaton and supports proposals for majority of this housing development will take place in or adjoining Long Eaton and Ilkeston urban areas. small windfall sites subject to requirements set out in the It does provide for approximately 300 homes, within policies in the Plan and the Local Plan. It also sets out how rural settlement boundaries, including Little Eaton. Little Eaton will play its part in meeting local and national Section 2c of this Policy states within “rural areas: housing needs. development restricted to within existing settlement boundaries to preserve the openness of the Green Belt”. The Local Plan does not provide for any housing allocations in Little Eaton, reflecting that it is not a suitable or sustainable location for major housing development. It does support in principle suitable ‘windfall’ housing development. BE2: HOUSING MIX Policy 8 of the Core Strategy ‘Housing Size, Mix and Policy BE2 supports and articulates the Core Strategy as it Choice’ seeks that residential development should seeks to ensure that future housing development proposals provide and contribute to a mix of housing tenures, deliver the type that meets local need. types and sizes, in order to create mixed and balanced communities. Adding, “that the appropriate mix of house size and tenure within housing development will be informed by” (amongst other things) “local evidence of housing need and demand”. BE3: GOOD DESIGN Policy 10 of the Core Strategy ‘Design and Policy BE3 adds local detail and context to the Core Strategy, Enhancing Local Identity’ requires that all new including through the identification of those design principles development should be “designed so as to make a that contribute to local distinctiveness and generally of positive contribution to the public realm” and “sense of place and have regard to the local context and importance to the community. reinforce valued local characteristics”.

BE4: CHARACTER Policy 11 of the Core Strategy ‘The Historic Policy BE4 supports and adds local context and detail to the BUILDINGS AND Environment’ supports proposals where the Core Strategy. This includes the identification of buildings significance of heritage assets and their settings STRUCTURES OF and structures of local heritage interest for protection. would be sustained or enhanced. It makes specific LOCAL HERITAGE reference (3d) to the identification of heritage assets INTEREST worthy of designation locally. BE5: ALFRETON Policy 11 of the Core Strategy ‘The Historic Policy BE5 supports and adds local context and detail to the ROAD SPECIAL Environment’ supports proposals where the Core Strategy. It identifies an area ‘Alfreton Road’ which it significance of heritage assets and their settings CHARACTER AREA considers is suitable for designation a Conservation Area. would be sustained or enhanced. It makes specific reference to 3 (d) identifying heritage assets worthy Neighbourhood Plan rules mean that the Plan cannot of designation locally, “including the identification designate it as a Conservation Area. It does support its of potential conservation areas”. designation as such by Erewash Borough Council. It proposes that it be designated as a Special Character Area in recognition of its special historic and distinctive character. It has been established that a Neighbourhood Plan can designate a Special Character Area. BE7: DEVELOPER Policy 18 of the Core Strategy ‘Infrastructure’ Policy BE 7 supports the Core Strategy by setting local CONTRIBUTIONS requires that New development must be supported priorities for any developer contributions and encourages by the required infrastructure at the appropriate developers to engage with the Parish Council prior to the stage and that Erewash Borough Council will work in partnership with infrastructure providers, grant preparation of any planning application to confirm these local funders, the development industry. priorities. LF1: PROTECTION OF Policy 12 of the Core Strategy ‘Local Services and Policy LF1 supports this Policy and provides greater local COMMUNITY Healthy Lifestyles identifies that community facilities detail and certainty by identifying the most important are key to sustainable communities and that to FACILITIES community facilities identified by the community. “protect community facilities it is necessary to put in place a mechanism to control alternative uses to ensure that their continued use as community facilities”. LF2: ENHANCEMENT Policy 12 of the Core Strategy ‘Local Services and Policy LF2 supports and adds local context to the Core OF COMMUNITY Healthy Lifestyles’ supports new, extended or Strategy, including proposals for enhanced facilities to meet improved community facilities where they meet a FACILITIES local need. local need.

Little Eaton Neighbourhood Plan – Statement of Basic Conditions

LF3: LITTLE EATON Policy 12 of the Core Strategy ‘Local Services and Policy LF3 supports and provides local detail to the Core VILLAGE CENTRE Healthy Lifestyles’ supports new, extended or Strategy by seeking to protect and enhance the role and improved community facilities where they meet a function of Little Eaton Village Centre local need. It also considers that community facilities should “be located within the Town Centres or other centres, wherever appropriate”. LF4: IMPROVED Spatial Objective ix of the Core Strategy. Policy LF4 supports the ambitions of the Core Strategy and ACCESS FOR ‘Opportunities for all; identifies that is necessary to provides local detail and context, including measures, how meet the needs of older and disabled people. In PEOPLE OF LIMITED this can be best supported at the local level. addition, the supporting text to Policy 14 ‘Managing MOBILITY Travel Demand’ states, “it is necessary to address inequality issues in transport and to consider the impact of modal shift on disabled people”. LF5: FOOTPATHS Policies 14 ‘Managing Travel Demand’ and 2 ‘The Policy LF5 provides further local details and context how AND CYCLEWAYS Spatial Strategy’ of the Core Strategy promote walking and cycling can be supported at the local level. walking and cycling and sustainable alternatives to the private car. LF6: TOURISM Policy 13 ‘Culture, Sport and Tourism’ of the Core Policy LF6 supports the re-use or conversion of buildings in Strategy supports the provision of sustainable order to encourage suitable tourism initiatives that are in tourism facilities, especially where they support the keeping with the local character. rural economy. NE1: BIODIVERSITY Policy 17 of the Core Strategy ‘Biodiversity’ seeks to Policy NE1 supports this Policy through the identification of increase the biodiversity of Erewash over the Core environmental and biodiversity assets elements at the local Strategy plan period. level. The Policy draws on work undertaken by the Derbyshire Wildlife Trust in support of the Plan. NE2: DARK SKIES Policy 17 of the Core Strategy ‘Biodiversity’ seeks to Similar to Policy NE1, Policy NE2 aims to limit non-essential increase the biodiversity of Erewash over the Core external lighting in order to maintain dark skies in the parish Strategy plan period. and limit the impact on local wildlife. The Policy draws on work undertaken by the CPRE and local wildlife data to provide local context and justification for the policy. The introduction of the Policy was promoted by Derbyshire County Council.

Little Eaton Neighbourhood Plan – Statement of Basic Conditions

NE4: BOTTLE BROOK Policy 16 of the Core Strategy ‘Green Infrastructure, Policy NE3 establishes a local framework for conservation Parks and Open Space’ that seeks to ensure that and enhancement of the recreational, biodiversity and flood existing and potential Green Infrastructure corridors defence value of Bottle Brook. and assets are protected and enhanced. The supporting text makes specific reference to the opportunities that river corridors provide for countryside access, migration of wildlife species tackle and flood attenuation. NE5: LOCAL GREEN Policy 16 of the Core Strategy ‘Green Infrastructure, Policy NE5 identifies 10 important local green spaces within SPACES Parks and Open Space’ (4) protects parks and open the Parish. It provides greater local detail and certainty by space from development and seeks “a strategic protecting the most important ones identified by the local approach to the delivery, protection and enhancement of Green Infrastructure will be taken community by their designation as Local Green Spaces aims through the establishment of a network of Green to protect a number of green areas which have particular local Infrastructure corridors and assets, particularly significance. The opportunity to Neighbourhood Plans focusing on links between Nottingham and Derby designates areas as Local Green Space was introduced by and Ilkeston and Long Eaton (as shown on the Key the NPPF (2012). Diagram), together with corridors and assets of a more local level”. NE6: TREES Policy 16 of the Core Strategy ‘Green Infrastructure, Policy NE6 supports this Policy. It seeks to protect trees and Parks and Open Space’ seeks to protect and hedgerows of good quality and/or visual significance that enhance green infrastructure. Para Sections 17.1 make a significant contribution to the character or amenity of clarifies that Green Infrastructure includes woodlands. the area. B1: PROTECT Policy 4 of the Core Strategy ‘Employment Provision Policy B1 supports and articulates as well as providing local EMPLOYMENT USES and Economic Development’ supports the retention detail and context to the Core Strategy. of good quality employment sites. B2: DUFFIELD ROAD Policy 4 of the Core Strategy ‘Employment Provision Policy B2 supports this ambition contained in the Core SITE and Economic Development’ supports the retention Strategy. The Plan provides further rationale and certainty of good quality employment sites. by specifically identifying Duffield Road as a good quality

employment site.

Little Eaton Neighbourhood Plan – Statement of Basic Conditions

B3: OUTRAMS Policy 4 of the Core Strategy ‘Employment Provision Policy B3 supports this ambition contained in the Core WHARF SITE and Economic Development’ supports the retention Strategy. The Plan provides further rationale by identifying of good quality employment sites. this as a good quality employment site, including suggested

measures and actions how its employment role and function could be improved. B4: OLD HALL MILL Policy 4 of the Core Strategy ‘Employment Provision Policy B4 supports and adds local context to the Core BUSINESS PARK and Economic Development’ supports the retention Strategy, including proposals to enhance attractiveness to of good quality employment sites. meet local need

Little Eaton Neighbourhood Plan – Statement of Basic Conditions

EU obligations Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA)

3.11 In some limited circumstances, where a neighbourhood plan could have significant environmental effects, it may require a Strategic Environmental Assessment under the relevant EU Directive. DCLG planning guidance suggests that, whether a neighbourhood plan requires a strategic environmental assessment and (if so) the level of detail needed, will depend on what is proposed in the draft neighbourhood plan. A strategic environmental assessment may be required, for example, where:

• a neighbourhood plan allocates sites for development;

• the neighbourhood area contains sensitive natural or heritage assets that may be affected by the proposals in the plan;

• the neighbourhood plan may have significant environmental effects that have not already been considered and dealt with through a sustainability appraisal of the Local Plan.

3.12 A screening of the draft Plan for environmental effects was undertaken in January 2019. It determined that a Strategic Environmental Assessment was not required.

Habitats Directive

3.13 A Habitat Regulation Assessment (HRA) screening of the Plan was undertaken in conjunction with the SEA screening. It was determined that an Appropriate Assessment under the EU Habitats Regulations was not required.

Convention on Human Rights

3.14 The Plan has regard to and is compatible with the fundamental rights and freedoms guaranteed under the European Convention on Human Rights. The Plan has been prepared with extensive input from the community and stakeholders as set out in the accompanying Statement of Consultation. Considerable care has been taken throughout the preparation and drafting of this Plan to ensure that the views of the whole community were embraced to avoid any unintentional negative impacts on particular groups.

3.15 There was extensive consultation and engagement in identifying issues and objectives and the community has been consulted on the draft Plan, as required by Regulation14 of the Neighbourhood Planning (General) Regulations 2012. Responses have been recorded, and changes have been made as per the schedule set out in the appendices to the Statement of Consultation. The Statement of Consultation has been prepared by the Steering Group and meets the requirements set out in Paragraph 15 (2) of the Regulations.

4.0 Conclusion

4.1 The Basic Conditions as set out in Schedule 4B of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 are considered to have been met by the Little Eaton Neighbourhood Plan.

4.2 The Plan has regard to national policy, will contribute towards the achievement of sustainable development, is in general conformity with the Erewash Core Strategy 2011-2028 (adopted in 2014) and the Erewash Local Plan Saved Policies 2005 (amended 2014).

4.3 It is therefore respectfully suggested to the Examiner that the Little Eaton Neighbourhood Plan complies with Paragraph 8(1)(a) of Schedule 4B of the Act.

Little Eaton Neighbourhood Plan – Statement of Basic Conditions

Little Eaton Neighbourhood Plan Consultation Statement

January 2019

Contents

1.0 Introduction……………………………………………………………...... 2

2.0 Designation of Neighbourhood Plan Area……………………………...2

3.0 Timeline and Summary of Key Activities………………………………..3

4.0 Publicity…………………………………………………………………….4

5.0 Getting Started…………………………………………………………….6

6.0 Preparing the Draft Plan………………………………………………….7

7.0 Regulation 14 Consultation ………..………………………………….,,,11 Appendices

Appendix 1

Appendix 2

Appendix 3

Appendix 4

Appendix 5

Appendix 6

Appendix 7

Appendix 8

Appendix 9

LITTLE EATON NEIGHBOURHOOD PLAN – CONSULTATION STATEMENT JANUARY 2019 V.1

1. Introduction This document provides a summary of the engagement that took place in developing the Little Eaton Neighbourhood Plan. It has been prepared in part to fulfil the legal obligations of the Neighbourhood Planning Regulations 2012. Section 15(2) of Part 5 of the Regulations sets out what a Consultation Statement should contain. According to the Regulations, a Consultation Statement:

a) contains details of the persons and bodies who were consulted about the proposed neighbourhood development plan;

b) explains how they were consulted;

c) summarises the main issues and concerns raised by the persons consulted;

d) describes how these issues and concerns have been considered and, where relevant, addressed in the proposed Neighbourhood Plan. The Little Eaton Neighbourhood Plan Steering Group was established under the auspices of Little Eaton Parish Council to oversee the development of the Plan. The Group identified that strong and effective consultation was key to the successful development and implementation of the Neighbourhood Plan. In particular, the consultation aimed to:

• Inform as many local people, community groups and other relevant bodies and stakeholders as possible of the existence of the Neighbourhood Plan and its development and; • Seek their views on the policies and proposals being developed by the Steering Group.

2. Designation of the Neighbourhood Plan Area Little Eaton Parish Council applied to Erewash Borough Council to designate the parish of Little Eaton as a Neighbourhood Plan Area. Following the requisite statutory consultation period, the area was designated by Erewash Council as Little Eaton Parish Neighbourhood Plan Area on 5 July 2017 (a copy of the record of designation can be found at https://moderngov.erewash.gov.uk/documents/s23139/Item%209%20Applicatio n%20to%20Designate%20Little%20Eaton%20Parish%20as%20a%20Neighbo urhood%20Area%20Report.pdf

LITTLE EATON NEIGHBOURHOOD PLAN – CONSULTATION STATEMENT JANUARY 2019 V.1

3. Timeline and Summary of Key Activities

Date Event or action Purpose/Outcome (change background colour) March 2017 Neighbourhood Plan A public meeting to discuss the merits of Introductory event developing a Neighbourhood Plan for Little Eaton. June – July The Parish formally Following consultation, the Parish was 2017 applies to Erewash for designated by Erewash Borough Council as designation as a a Neighbourhood Plan Area on 5 July 2017. Neighbourhood Plan Area. August A web page, dedicated to The webpage provided background 2017 Little Eaton information on the Plan, contact details and Neighbourhood Plan was how to get involved and progress on the Plan. introduced. It can be found at https://www.littleeatonplan.co.uk/. September Little Eaton To raise awareness of the Plan, seek 2017 Neighbourhood Plan volunteers from the community to join the Launch. Steering Committee and Theme Groups and discuss potential themes for the Plan. December Steering Committee To drive the development of the Plan and 2017 established comprising ensure that it reflects local needs and one parish councillor and priorities. non-councillor members of the community. Theme Group ‘Kick Off’ To ‘kick off’ the Theme Groups, raise Meeting. awareness of the Plan and to help determine the key issues of local importance which the Theme Groups should focus on. The first meetings of the To look at in detail each of the identified Theme Groups. themes (built environment, natural environment, leisure and facilities and Jan – March business and employment) which the Theme 2018 Groups (and the Plan) should focus on. Meeting took place with To raise awareness of the Plan and help representatives from the understand local businesses key concerns local business and potential opportunities and priorities for community. inclusion in the Plan, with a focus on the needs of local business and industry. Local business A survey of local businesses was undertaken Questionnaire. to better understand their views on shaping the future development of Little Eaton. A

LITTLE EATON NEIGHBOURHOOD PLAN – CONSULTATION STATEMENT JANUARY 2019 V.1

summary of the findings can be found at https://www.littleeatonplan.co.uk/ April 2018 Community A household survey was undertaken to better Questionnaire understand resident’s views on shaping the future development of Little Eaton. A summary of the findings can be found at https://www.littleeatonplan.co.uk/. July 2018 A community To raise awareness of the Plan and consult consultation drop-in with the community and community groups exhibition, on two on the emerging proposals and receive. A separate days, as part of summary of the findings can be found at the Little Eaton Carnival https://www.littleeatonplan.co.uk/. week 29 October Regulation 14 Statutory six-week consultation to receive to 12 Consultation on Draft feedback on the draft Plan. December Plan. 2018 January Strategic Environmental To meet the ‘Basic Conditions’ which all 2019 Assessment and HRA Neighbourhood Plans are required to meet. Screening. January Submission of Draft Plan In accordance with Regulation 15. 2019 to Erewash Borough Council.

4. Publicity

The Steering Group undertook a proactive publicity campaign throughout the development of the Neighbourhood Plan. The community and stakeholders were kept informed on the progress of the Plan and encouraged to become involved through the following methods:

4.1 Little Eaton Neighbourhood Plan Website

A website, dedicated to the Neighbourhood Plan, was developed by the Neighbourhood Plan Steering Committee. The website provided background information on the Plan, contact details, how to become involved and general progress on the Plan. This website can be found at https://www.littleeatonplan.co.uk/.

4.2 Little Eaton Parish Council Webpage

Little Eaton Parish Council also developed a dedicated webpage as an integral part of its overall general Parish Council web site. As in 4.1 above, the webpage provided background information on the Plan, contact details and how to get involved. It also included a link to the main Little Eaton Neighbourhood Plan website. This website can be found at https://www.littleeatonparishcouncil.org.uk/neighbourhood-plan.html. LITTLE EATON NEIGHBOURHOOD PLAN – CONSULTATION STATEMENT JANUARY 2019 V.1

4.3 Erewash Borough Council Webpage

This included a dedicated webpage that provided background information on the Plan and key stages in its progress. This website can be found at https://www.erewash.gov.uk/neighbourhood-planning/little-eaton-neighbourhood- plan.html.

4.4 Parish Council and other Notice Boards, Local Shops & Village School

Regular notices were placed on the Parish Council Notice Boards in the Parish preceding key consultation events and outlining progress on the Plan. Local Shops and the Village School were used to complement information on the Parish Notice Boards where possible.

4.5 Parish Council Meetings

The progress of the Neighbourhood Plan was included as a standard agenda item at Parish Council meetings and either the Chair or the Secretary of the Steering Group, attended regularly to brief the Parish Council and take questions Two specific meetings, of the Little Eaton Parish Council, were arranged at critical stages in the preparation of the Plan. These were the prior to the Consultation Period and the Submission Stage.

4.6 Flyers

Flyers were circulated to households, throughout the Little Eaton Parish, to inform residents prior to the distribution of the Questionnaire and at the Pre-Submission Draft Stage. The objectives were to increase awareness of key stages in the preparation of the Plan and encourage participation in either the Questionnaire or to provide feedback.

4.7 Little Eaton Newsletter

This newsletter is circulated to every household in the Parish on a quarterly basis. It provided a means to communicate on all aspects and progress of the Neighbourhood Plan in every issue since August 2017, in most editions Plan updates were on the front page.

4.8 Social Media

Regular Updates were fed into Facebook and simultaneously appeared on Twitter. They were also then crossed posted onto Little Eaton Carnival’s Facebook Page (1034 Likes) and Twitter accounts (106 followers) which also linked into their Instagram feed (96 followers) The Facebook has 117 Likes and Twitter (@littleeatonplan) 16 followers.

LITTLE EATON NEIGHBOURHOOD PLAN – CONSULTATION STATEMENT JANUARY 2019 V.1

5.0 Getting started

5.1 Public Meeting A public meeting was held on the evening of 20 March 2017, at Little Eaton Village Hall, to inform the community about neighbourhood planning and discuss the support for Little Eaton to produce a Neighbourhood Plan. The event was well advertised through, posters and via the Parish Council website, inviting all local residents and stakeholders to attend. The meeting was led by representatives from the Parish Council, Guy Martin, a Derbyshire County Council Neighbourhood Planning Champion and Andrew Towlerton, a neighbourhood planning consultant. This was also an opportunity to build interest amongst attendees and identify individuals that would like to take an active role in developing a neighbourhood plan. The meeting was attended by an estimated 90 - 100 local residents. 5.2 Steering Group A Steering Group was established, under the auspices of the Parish Council in December 2017, to drive the development of the Plan and ensure that it reflected local needs and priorities. This Group comprised of one parish councillor and other members of the community including representatives from the local business community. It was chaired by a member of the local community, Sir Philip Hunter. The members of the Committee are listed below:

Philip Hunter (Chair)

Clive Pegg (Secretary)

Helen Handley (Treasurer)

David Howard (Communications and Business Lead)

Steve Mann (Project management)

Hilary Young (Built Environment Lead)

Naomi Fletcher (Leisure and Facilities Lead)

Stella Warren (Natural Environment Lead)

Fiona Williamson (former Parish Councillor)

All meetings of the Steering Group were open to the public.

LITTLE EATON NEIGHBOURHOOD PLAN – CONSULTATION STATEMENT JANUARY 2019 V.1

6.0 Preparing the draft plan

6.1 Theme Group ‘Kick Off’ Meeting On the evening of 15 January 2018, in the O.A.P Hall, Little Eaton, a public meeting was held to raise awareness of the decision of the Parish Council to prepare a Neighbourhood Plan, invite residents and stakeholders to become involved in Theme Groups and to determine the key issues of local importance which the Theme Groups should focus on. The event was well advertised through, posters and via the Parish Council website. There were over 55 - 60 people in attendance. 6.2 The first meetings of the Theme Groups The first round of meetings of the Theme Groups took place soon after the Theme Group ‘Kick Off’ Meeting. The role of each Group was to look in detail into each of the identified themes that the Plan would focus on. The Groups were: • Built Environment. • Natural Environment. • Leisure and Facilities. • Business and Employment. The Theme Groups comprised residents and other stakeholders, including representatives from the local business community and local groups such as the Little Eaton Local Historic Society and owners of local businesses. The Steering Group met on a monthly basis. All meetings of the Theme Groups were open to the public. The Chairman of each Theme Group was represented on the Steering Group. 6.3 Business Forum with representatives from local employers On 9 March 2018, a forum took place with representatives from the local business. Held at the local business premises KC Jones, about 20 people from the local business community were in attendance. The aim was to raise awareness of the Plan and help understand local businesses key concerns and potential opportunities and priorities for inclusion in the Plan, with a focus on the needs of local business and industry. All local businesses were contacted by email or letter and invited to attend (see Appendix 1 for a copy of the email sent to all businesses). 6.4 Local Business Questionnaire In March 2018, the Steering Committee conducted a survey of local businesses. The questionnaire was aimed at:

LITTLE EATON NEIGHBOURHOOD PLAN – CONSULTATION STATEMENT JANUARY 2019 V.1

▪ Understanding the concerns of the business community in relation to future development. ▪ Understanding the key policy areas on which the Neighbourhood Plan should focus. ▪ Understanding the type of businesses that operate. Paper copies of the questionnaire were distributed by the Steering Committee to members of the business community who attended a business forum meeting held on March 9th, 2018 (see above) as well as directly to other businesses in the Parish. There were 17 respondents to the questionnaire. This is considered to be a good return rate especially given the limited number of businesses that are based in the Parish. • When asked “What were the important reasons for being based in Little Eaton?” the most frequent responses were “Close to Where You Live, Good Transport Links and Affordable Premises” each with 5 respondents stating that it was very important. The least popular response was “Proximity to Suppliers” then “Proximity to Customers”. • They were also “What barriers or constraints prevents businesses moving to Little Eaton or existing businesses expanding?” The most common reasons stated (i.e. mentioned more than twice) were “transport/access issue; car parking; availability of suitable premises and broadband”. • Better transport links was given as the main factor that would help businesses to develop and thrive over the next 10 years, followed by better or bigger sites and improved broadband.

A report of the findings can be found here: Business Survey Report (click link) 6.5 Community Questionnaire The Steering Group conducted a survey of local residents to support the development of the Plan.

The survey was undertaken during April 2018, and was aimed at:

• Understanding the character and needs of the parish as a community. • Understanding the concerns of the community in relation to future development. • Understanding the key policy areas on which the Neighbourhood Plan should focus. The survey was delivered to all households in the Parish and was open to all parishioners over the age of 16 years to complete.

It was promoted by the Steering Group, through posters in the community and online. An online link to the questionnaire was hosted on the Little Eaton Neighbourhood website, where residents could also download additional copies to complete

LITTLE EATON NEIGHBOURHOOD PLAN – CONSULTATION STATEMENT JANUARY 2019 V.1

There was a good return rate, with 387 individuals/ households from a total population of 1,986 (16 years and above) and 1,015 households in the Parish completing questionnaires.

The results of the survey were interesting, with a clear consensus in several areas and some strong views, highlighting the strong sense of pride the community has for where they live and the desire to protect its special qualities. The key findings were as follows: ▪ There is a strong appreciation for the area and, in particular, access to the countryside, the rural character and village atmosphere. ▪ Addressing speeding vehicles through the village, parking (especially associated with the Co-op), better bus services and facilities/ activities for older children were amongst the potential improvements that could be made to the parish. ▪ The majority of respondents (94%) believe that it is important for Little Eaton to remain a village. ▪ In terms of the scale of future development, residents generally favour smaller/individual homes (65%). ▪ There is a strong consensus (90%) for brownfield sites in the built-up area to be prioritised for future house building in lieu of greenfield sites within the built- up area or green belt. ▪ Respondents have a preference for small family homes (71%) and affordable starter homes (70%) in any future housing development. ▪ Community facilities are strongly valued and well utilised and, in particular, the village shops, St Peter’s Park and the public footpaths. The majority of respondents are satisfied with the availability and sustainability of facilities in the parish. ▪ There is general community support for the proposal to enhance St Peter’s Park and Village Hall, and in particular improvements to the hall toilets and playground equipment. ▪ The community is generally supportive of future tourism/ leisure and creative Industries in the parish, unsupportive of offices and divided with regards to encouraging retail as a business activity. ▪ There is support for improvements to the village centre and in particular, enhancing the run-down and under-utilised sites and protecting current retail uses. A report of the outcomes can be found here: Little Eaton Community Questionnaire (click link) 6.6 Community Consultation – Little Eaton Community Carnival Two staffed drop-in events were held on Sunday 1 July and Saturday 8 July 2018. These events had three main aims: LITTLE EATON NEIGHBOURHOOD PLAN – CONSULTATION STATEMENT JANUARY 2019 V.1

• To inform the community of the aims and background of the Little Eaton Neighbourhood Plan; • To outline progress to date; and • To gain views on the Plan’s emerging proposals and policies. The location and timings of these events were purposefully chosen to help maximise attendance by members of the community and stakeholders. They took place as an integral part of the Little Eaton Community Carnival. Held annually, the Little Eaton Community Carnival is the most popular, well known and well- attended community event in the Parish and the surrounding area.

The events were extensively publicised throughout the community including through posters, word of mouth, and the Parish Council website.

They were very well attended with over 130 people recorded as visiting the stand over the two days. This may be an underestimate as some visitors may not have been counted at busy times.

A range of comments was received. Verbal and written feedback was almost always positive - in particular, on the Questionnaire (interest in the results); approval of the emerging policies and proposals and recognition of the work that had gone into the Neighbourhood Plan. There were no serious challenges or concerns, though some people considered that some parts of it could be strengthened, for example, in relation to flood defence. There was a high level of awareness of the Plan amongst visitors, and the events should have enhanced this awareness further.

A report outlining the comments received is available here: Little Eaton Carnival – Community Consultation (click link)

6.7 Meetings and Discussions with officers and their representatives from Erewash Borough Council The Steering Group worked closely with planning officers, their representatives and consultants at Erewash Borough Council throughout the process. This included providing them with drafts of the Plan at various stages in its development on which detailed comments were received (see Appendix B for an example).

6.8 Other Meetings and Discussions The Steering Group engaged with other relevant bodies and individuals in the development of specific policies and supporting studies. The Derbyshire Wildlife Trust assisted with information and policies especially for the Natural Environment Chapter of the Plan. The Little Eaton Local Historical Society was consulted regarding the heritage policies including the proposed Little Eaton Character Buildings and Structures of Local Historic interest and the Alfreton Road Special Character Area. Meetings also took place with developers and land owners.

LITTLE EATON NEIGHBOURHOOD PLAN – CONSULTATION STATEMENT JANUARY 2019 V.1

7.0 Regulation 14 Consultation

Following initial consultation with the community and other stakeholders on the emerging draft Plan and subsequent consideration by the Parish Council, it was agreed to proceed with the formal pre-submission consultation in accordance with Regulation 14 of the Neighbourhood Planning Regulations. The consultation period commenced on the 29 October and ended on the 12 December 2018. This ensured there were at least 6 weeks available for consultation responses to be made as required by Neighbourhood Plan regulations. The draft Pre-submission Plan was publicised effectively in the local community and to wider stakeholders. This included where the Plan could be viewed and the methods by which a response could be given. The draft Pre-submission Plan was made available on: • The dedicated Little Eaton Neighbourhood Plan website. • By request to the Little Eaton Parish Council office. • Two occasions, on the 27 and 30 October 2018, when paper copies of the Pre-submission Plan could be collected from the parish council offices and members of the Steering Group would be available to answer questions.

The community were informed about the consultation via: • A leaflet (see Appendix 2) which was distributed to setting out the main conclusions and inviting comments. • Posters at parish council and village notice boards in the Parish (see Appendix 3). • Notices and supporting evidence, placed on the dedicated Little Eaton Neighbourhood Plan website (see Appendix 4) • Drop-in events on the 27th and the 30th October, when paper copies of the Plan were available (15 were collected) and members of the Steering Group were available to answer questions • Social media including Facebook and Twitter. • Other websites such as Erewash Borough Council (see Appendix 5). • Texts were requested via the Little Eaton Primary School text service to all parents to get involved/send comments. • Email communication to business and community organisations and list of interested individuals. • Neighbourhood Plan Steering Group members encouraged people to respond. • The Parish Council Newsletter was used to encourage feedback and comments. (See Appendix 6)

LITTLE EATON NEIGHBOURHOOD PLAN – CONSULTATION STATEMENT JANUARY 2019 V.1

Statutory consultees and relevant bodies were informed via: • Email or letter (the email and full list of consultees are set out in Appendices 7 and 8).

Responses could be made via: • Email to [email protected]. • Online form on the Little Eaton Neighbourhood Plan website. • In writing to The Secretary, Little Eaton Neighbourhood Plan, c/o The Clerk, Little Eaton Parish Council, P.O. Box 8108, Derby, Derbyshire DE1 0ZU. Responses

A total of 26 responses were received. There were some important issues raised and many were supportive of the Plan and its aims.

The responses received were considered by the Neighbourhood Plan Steering Group. The Plan was then amended accordingly.

A summary of consultation responses received was produced setting out the main comments received and the Steering Group’s conclusion on them. (see Appendix 9).

The amendments and the revised Submission Plan were considered by Little Eaton Parish Council which formally agreed to the submission of the draft Little Eaton Neighbourhood Plan to Erewash Borough Council. The Plan was submitted to the Borough Council in January 2019.

LITTLE EATON NEIGHBOURHOOD PLAN – CONSULTATION STATEMENT JANUARY 2019 V.1

8.0 Appendices Appendix 1

Email sent to local business inviting them Business Forum meeting on March 9 at 12.30.

Dear XXXXXXXXX

As a business located in Little Eaton, you may or may not be aware that the Parish council has commissioned a Neighbourhood Plan to be written.

A Neighbourhood Plan is a strategic document setting out the vision for the Parish and what developments will be allowed and what is considered not in the interest of the Parish.

There are major projects, such as the A38 improvements and the proposed greenways, that will have an impact on business and how people travel to and from the Parish.

Neighbourhood Plans are designed to be a “Bottom, Up” process which means that we need to understand the needs of everyone in the Parish to develop a plan that meets the needs of majority of the Parish. We understand that the business community in the Parish is an important part of ensuring the Village thrives and offers opportunities for everyone to enrich their lives through providing a “great place to live, a great place to work and a great place to visit”

We need your input into our plan and so we would like to invite you to a Business Forum meeting on March 9th at 12.30.

KC Jones on Duffield Road have kindly allowed us to use their facilities and a buffet lunch ill be provided.

We will have consultants on hand to inform you of what The Neighbourhood Plan is all about and we will be looking to understand more about your company’s plans and needs for growth in the future.

Please can you confirm your attendance by email to: [email protected] so we can cater for the appropriate numbers. Please advise us of any dietary requirements, when emailing.

Thank you and we look forward to meeting you on the 9th March

Dave Howard

Communications, Little Eaton Neighbourhood Plan

Email: [email protected]

Facebook: @littleeatonplan

Twitter: @littleeatonplan

LITTLE EATON NEIGHBOURHOOD PLAN – CONSULTATION STATEMENT JANUARY 2019 V.1

Appendix 2

Leaflet Sent to residents

LITTLE EATON NEIGHBOURHOOD PLAN – CONSULTATION STATEMENT JANUARY 2019 V.1

Appendix 3

Poster used on Village Notice Boards

LITTLE EATON NEIGHBOURHOOD PLAN – CONSULTATION STATEMENT JANUARY 2019 V.1

Appendix 4

Notice and supporting evidence placed on Little Eaton Neighbourhood Plan website informing the community about the consultation on the Draft Plan

LITTLE EATON NEIGHBOURHOOD PLAN – CONSULTATION STATEMENT JANUARY 2019 V.1

Appendix 5

Notice on Erewash Borough Council website informing the community about the consultation on the Draft Plan

Appendix 6 Parish Council Newsletter

LITTLE EATON NEIGHBOURHOOD PLAN – CONSULTATION STATEMENT JANUARY 2019 V.1

Appendix 7 Email to Statutory Consultees

LITTLE EATON NEIGHBOURHOOD PLAN – CONSULTATION STATEMENT JANUARY 2019 V.1

Appendix 8 List of Statutory Consultees SCL - Local Authorities Statutory Consultation Bodies Sections b)

Amber Valley Aston on Trent Rushcliffe Castle Donington Broxtowe Lockington and Hemmington NW Leicestershire Barton in Fabis Derby City Thrumpton South Derbyshire Breaston Nottingham City Breadsall Aldercar and Langley Mill Dale Abbey Duffield Draycott Holbrook Little Eaton Horsley Morley Mapperley Ockbrook and Borrowash Shipley Risley Smalley Sandiacre Awsworth Sawley Cossall Stanley and Stanley Common Greasley Stanton-By-Dale Stapleford West Hallam Trowell Elvaston Derbyshire County Council Shardlow and Great Wilne Leicestershire County Council Nottinghamshire County Council

LITTLE EATON NEIGHBOURHOOD PLAN – CONSULTATION STATEMENT JANUARY 2019 V.1

SCL - Specific Sectors, Agencies, Trusts Statutory Consultation Bodies Specific Sectors_Agencies_Trusts c) The Coal Authority d) The Homes and Communities Agency e) Natural England f) The Environment Agency g) The Historic Buildings and Monuments Commission for England (known as English Heritage) h) Network Rail Infrastructure i) The Highways Agency j) The Marine Management Organisation k) EMF Enquires (Vodafone & O2) EE Three l) (i) Derbyshire Community Health Services Foundation Trust l) (ii) Western Power Distribution l) (iii) British Gas l) (iv) Severn Trent Water l) (v) Severn Trent Water m) Erewash Voluntary Action n) Derbyshire County Council (Equality and Diversity Team) o) Local Churches Flyers posted through doors p) Derbyshire, Nottinghamshire and Leicestershire Chamber of Commerce (Derby Office) q) Derbyshire Coalition for Independent Living

Others) Derbyshire Wildlife Trust Police and Crime Commissioner for Derbyshire Rural Action Derbyshire Campaign to Protect Rural England National Trust District Councillors County Councillor

LITTLE EATON NEIGHBOURHOOD PLAN – CONSULTATION STATEMENT JANUARY 2019 V.1

SCL – Business organisations Business Organisations 20 Ten Garage Services KC Jones Conferences A Hill Electrician KC Plastering A.B. Camp & Sons Ltd Keene Electronics Adaptive Karate Kip McGrath Allgas L A Systems Ltd Architectural Windows & GlazingLittle Eaton Fish Bar

Aston Murray Little Eaton Garage Baby Sensory Little Eaton Smithy Banner Plant Limited Little Eaton Starbucks Barry Fitch Ltd Live Steam Models Beer Metropolis Magfern Bell & Harp Mali Raj Big On Bikes March Hair Bottle Kiln Marcus Leon Martinez Sports Massage Bottom Line Fitness Mark Haspel, Landscaping & Gardening Central England Co-operativeMarriott Limited Breadsall Priory Hotel and Restaurant Chembond Mercia Image Limited Cityink Express MJ East plumbing Cottage Cattery Morcon Foundations Ltd Coxbench Hall Residential HomeNathan's Of Derby D&D Newsagents Nottingham Lighting Centre Ltd Daisy Hill Pet Shop OMG Signs David Ray Commercials Ltd P Kirkland DEB Dispensing Limited Painter Louise Roper Derby Garden Centre Painting Parlour Derby Pilates Petstay Derwent Law Professional Properties Dyl & Co Quantaqua East Midlands Demolition LtdQueenB's Mobile Hairdressing East Midlands Golf Academy Queen's Head Eaton Electrical Robby Stone Recovery Services Eight Days a week printing RotheraSharp Energas S Hawkins Plumbing and Heating Engineer Events Covered SeeCars Exquisite Blooms Slimming World Food & Dairy Engineering CoSmithCooper Forward Fabrications Ltd BoilerStar Manufacturers Generation Music Academy Fox & Hounds Stoney Cross Garage Ltd G F Tomlinson Group Ltd/TotalSuzannah Hire Macken, Podiatry G. Wathall & Son Ltd Tec-IT Gem Ornamental The New Inn Gemstone Natural Products Train with Ailsa Greenhatch Group Ltd Trent Barton Henry's of Derby Trix Academy Homeworks Twistin Tots Horlsey Lodge UK Gas Services Limited Howarth Signs Underwood Vinecombe Solicitors HS Plastering & Dry Lining LtdW.B. Birkett & Sons Ltd. Ian Wright decorating Washercare John Bush Management ConsultantsWildlife Workshops WR Evans Ltd (Manor Pharmacy)

LITTLE EATON NEIGHBOURHOOD PLAN – CONSULTATION STATEMENT JANUARY 2019 V.1

SCL- Community Organisations & Landowners Local Community Organisations Little Eaton Beavers Little Eaton Bowls Club Little Eaton Carnival Little Eaton Community Association Little Eaton Cubs Little Eaton Dance School Little Eaton Gardening Club Little Eaton Historical Society Little Eaton in Bloom Little Eaton Junior Football Club Little Eaton Players Little Eaton Playschool Little Eaton Primary School Little Eaton Produce Show Little Eaton PTA Summer Fayre Little Eaton Scouts Little Eaton Senior Football Club Little Eaton Tennis Club Little Eaton United Reformed Church Little Eaton Village Hall Little Eaton Women's Institute Little Eaton Youth Café

Landowners/potential developersDavid Ray Commercials Limited, Ford Farm, Ford Ln, Breadsall, Little Eaton DE21 5DA David Brocklehurst, 83 Duffield Road, Little Eaton , Derby, Derbyshire, DE21 5DS Planning Agent: Ian McHugh Mark Blood Building Design, Manor Farm House, London Road, Shardlow, Derby DE72 2GR

LITTLE EATON NEIGHBOURHOOD PLAN – CONSULTATION STATEMENT JANUARY 2019 V.1

Appendix 9 – Consultation Responses

See the report "Summary of responses to Pre-Submission Draft" click link to download.

LITTLE EATON NEIGHBOURHOOD PLAN – CONSULTATION STATEMENT JANUARY 2019 V.1

Strategic Environmental Assessment Screening Little Eaton Neighbourhood Plan 2018 - 2033 and Habitats Regulation

Assessment Screening January 2019 Report

Contents

1.0 Introduction……………………………………………………………………….…...... 2

1.1 This Report………………………………………………………………….…….…2

1.2 Legislative Background…………………………………………………..………...2

1.3 Planning Context…………………………………………………………………….4

1.4 The Little Eaton Neighbourhood Plan…………………………….……………....4

2.0 The Screening Process………..…..………………………………………………………..7

2.1 SEA Screening……………………………………….……………………………..7

2.2 SEA Screening Conclusion……………………………………………………….16

2.3 HRA Screening ……………………………………………………………………16

2.4 In Combination effects……..……………………………………………………...20

2.5 HRA Screening Conclusion………………………………………………………20

3.0 Conclusion………………………………………………………………………...………..20

Appendix A: Little Eaton Neighbourhood Plan Policies….…………………………….………..22

Appendix B: Annex 1 and Annex II of the EIA Directive………………………………………...29

Figures

Fig 1 Application of criteria of the SEA Directive to plans….………………………....3

Fig 2 Little Eaton Neighbourhood Area………………………………………………….4

Fig 3 Establishing whether there is a need for an SEA………………………………..8

Fig 4 Little Eaton Neighbourhood Plan and SEA Directive…………………………..11

Fig 5 European Designated Sites……………………………………………………….18

Fig 6 Assessment of likely environmental impacts on European sites……………..18

1.0 Introduction

1.1 This report

1.1.1 A neighbourhood plan must meet a set of basic conditions. This includes demonstrating that the plan does not breach and is compatible with EU obligations.

1.1.2 The screening report seeks to determine whether the draft Little Eaton Neighbourhood Plan (‘the Plan’) is likely to have significant environmental effects and will require a formal strategic environmental assessment (SEA). Secondly, it assesses the likelihood of the proposals within the Plan having an adverse impact upon a European site through a Habitats Regulations Assessment (HRA).

1.1.3 This SEA and HRA screening document is being undertaken on the submission draft of the Plan (Jan 2019).

1.1.4 The screening report is structured as follows:

• Section 1.0 outlines the legislative background to SEA and HRA and an overview of the Plan • Section 2.0 provides screening assessments of the likely significant environmental effects of the Plan for SEA and likely significant effects of the Plan on a European Site. • Section 3.0 provides a conclusion as to whether a formal SEA and/or Appropriate Assessment (HRA) is required.

1.1.5 In forming its determinations, consultation was undertaken with the three statutory consultation bodies designated in the regulations (Historic England, Natural England and Environment Agency) as well as Erewash Borough Council on whether a SEA and HRA is required.

1.2 Legislative Background

Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) 1.2.1 The need for environmental assessment of Neighbourhood Plans stems from the European Directive 2001/42/EC and was transposed into English law by the Environmental Assessment of Plans and Programmes Regulations (EAPP) 2004, or SEA Regulations.

1.2.2 The SEA Directive aims to ensure a high level of protection for the environment and to integrate environmental considerations into the preparation of plans. The screening procedure is based on criteria set out in Schedule 1 of the EAPP Regulations 2004. The report assesses the Plan against the criteria, and on that basis, sets out whether an SEA is required. Figure 1 sets out the basic framework for establishing whether an SEA will be required.

Figure 1: Application of criteria of the SEA Directive to Plans

Habitats Regulations Assessment

1.2.3 Schedule 2 of the Neighbourhood Planning (General) Regulations 2012 makes provision in relation to the Habitats Directive. Article 6 (3) of the EU Habitats Directive (Council Directive 92/43/EEC) and regulation 61 of the Conservation of Habitats and Species Regulations 2010 (as amended) requires that an appropriate assessment of plans and programs is carried out with regard to the conservation objectives of European Sites (Natura 2000 sites) and that other plans and projects identify any significant effect that is likely for any European Site.

1.2.4 The legislation requires that, where there is a risk of a significant effect on a European site, either individually or in combination with other plans or projects then the plan should progress from HRA screening to an Appropriate Assessment.

1.2.5 On 13th April the Court of Justice of the European Union published its ruling regarding the ‘People Over Wind’ legal judgement on Habitats Regulations Assessment & the Habitats Directive. The Court of Justice clarified that it is not appropriate to take account of mitigation measures when screening plans and projects for their effects on European protects habitats under the Habitats Directive. Therefore, if a likely significant effect is identified at the screening stage of a habitats assessment, an ‘Appropriate Assessment’ must be undertaken.

1.3 Planning Context

1.3.1 The Plan, once adopted, will form part of the planning policy framework for the Little Eaton Neighbourhood Plan Area. In accordance with the Neighbourhood Planning Regulations (2012), the Plan will need to be in general conformity with the strategic policies which are adopted by the relevant local authority (Erewash Borough Council).

1.3.2 The adopted local plan for the local authority area is the Erewash Core Strategy 2011-2028 and the Erewash Local Plan Saved Policies 2005 (amended 2014)

1.4 The Little Eaton Neighbourhood Plan

1.4.1 The Little Eaton Neighbourhood Plan Area was designated in July 2017. It covers the area of Little Eaton Parish as identified in figure 2.

1.4.2 Little Eaton Parish is located in the Borough of Erewash and comprises the main settlement of Little Eaton surrounded by open countryside, most of which is designated as Green Belt.

1.4.3 The Parish is set in the valleys formed from the congruence of the river Derwent and Bottle Brook. It is surrounded by the hills of the Blue Mountains and Drum Hill and areas of woodland.

1.4.4 The Parish has retained many of the old buildings and much of the charm that has developed naturally over the centuries. There are two Conservation Areas in the Parish and 15 designated heritage assets. Little Eaton Conservation Area covers the centre of the village and Eaton Bank Conservation Area is situated at the northern edge of the Parish. In 2001, the Derwent Valley was designated as a World Heritage Site. The site, including its buffer zone, falls partially within the western Parish boundary.

1.4.5 The natural environment is scenic and encompasses a diversity of habitat and wildlife including seven Local Wildlife Sites. There are a number of disused quarries surrounded by woodlands (one of which is designated as a Site of Regional Geological Importance). These are important habitats for a rich variety of plants and animals including Priority habitat and species.

1.4.6 The purpose of the Neighbourhood Plan is to provide a set of statutory planning policies to guide development within the Plan area over the period to 2028 and has been prepared by a steering group on behalf of the qualifying body, Little Eaton Parish Council.

1.4.7 The vision of the Plan is

Little Eaton will maintain its character as a rural village community. The population will remain around 2,500. There will be some more starter and retirement homes for local people. There will be a vibrant community with places to meet and play. It will be surrounded by green spaces, for wildlife to flourish and residents to enjoy. There will be thriving business for local people who want to work close to home. It will be an even better place to live, work and to visit.

1.4.8 Underpinning this vision are 16 objectives:

1 Support housing to meet the needs of the local people, including affordable new starter homes and retirement homes, ideally built on brownfield sites within the village settlement boundary.

2 Prioritise smaller homes of up to 3 bedrooms, affordable starter and retirement homes where the properties are appropriate in scale and do not increase flood risk.

3 Protect important heritage buildings and assets.

4 Develop and implement a traffic management plan for the village centre.

5 Ensure that development does not place undue demands on facilities and infrastructure.

6 Protect and enhance community facilities

7 Develop and implement a plan to enhance the village centre.

8 Prepare a plan for improving and maintaining the footpath/ cycle-path network based upon the establishment of the Little Eaton Greenway.

9 Seek opportunities for increasing suitable tourism and leisure activities within the village.

10 Protect and enhance biodiversity.

11 Minimise the noise and air pollution from the A38 through the construction of man-made and natural barriers.

12 Identify and protect the most important local green spaces.

13 Promote, restore and conserve important trees and hedgerows.

14 Develop a concept for business activities consistent with the overall aim of enhancing the current character of the village.

15 Enhance Duffield Road and Outrams Wharf Sites as local centres for employment and business.

16 Re-model Old Hall Mill Business Park.

1.4.9 In order to deliver these objectives, the Plan sets out a number of planning policies. These indicate how new development proposals will be assessed in order to ensure that any future housing is sustainable, meets local need and does not have a detrimental impact upon the Parish. Policies also seek to ensure development proposals recognise the historic character of the area and provide protection for important environments and natural assets, including local green spaces.

Figure 2: Little Eaton Neighbourhood Area

2.0 The Screening Process

2.1 SEA Screening

2.1.1 The process for determining whether or not an SEA is required is called screening. The SEA screening is a two stage process:

Stage 1 considers the Plan generically against the SEA Assessment criteria specified in the national guidance (A Practical Guide to the Strategic Environmental Assessment; Fig 1). Where it is determined that there is a potential for a Neighbourhood Plan to have a significant effect on the environment, it will be necessary to progress to Stage 2.

Stage 2 involves testing the Plan against the criteria set out in the SEA Directive Article 3 (5) Annex II, to determine the likely significance of environmental effects.

2.1.2 Figure 3 provides a generic assessment of the Plan against the SEA Assessment criteria.

Figure 3: Establishing whether there is a need for an SEA

Stage Y/N Reason

1. Is the plan or programme subject Neighbourhood plans may be prepared to preparation and/or adoption by a under the provisions of the Town and national, regional or local authority Country Planning Act 1990, as amended OR prepared by an authority for by the Localism Act 2011. They are drawn adoption through a legislative up by a qualifying body, which, in the case procedure by Parliament or Y of Little Eaton, is the Parish Council. It is Government? (Art. 2(a)) subject to examination and referendum. If the Plan receives 50% or more affirmative votes at referendum, it will be ‘made’ by the local planning authority (Erewash Borough Council).

2. Is the PP required by legislative, The preparation of a Neighbourhood Plan regulatory or administrative is optional. Once ‘made’, it will form part of provisions? (Art. 2(a)) N the statutory Local Plan for the area and should continue to be screened under the SEA Directive.

3. Is the Plan prepared for The Neighbourhood Plan has been agriculture, forestry, fisheries, prepared for town and country planning energy, industry, transport, waste and land use and sets out a framework for management, water management, future development in Little Eaton. Once telecommunications, tourism, town ‘made’, it would form part of the statutory Y and country planning or land use, development plan and will be used when AND does it set a framework for making decisions on planning applications future development consent of that could include development that may projects in Annex I and II to the EIA fall under Annex I and II of the EIA Directive? (Article 3.2 (a) directive.

4. Will the Plan, in view of its likely The Plan does not allocate sites for effects on sites, require an housing or other forms of development, but assessment for future development instead provides further local criteria for under Article 6 or 7 of the Habitats proposals to meet in support of existing Directive? (Article 3.2(b) and local planning policies. It is unlikely therefore that the Plan will have a N significant adverse effect upon any European (Natura 2000) site. There is no European site within the Parish, the nearest site being 15km to the north east. There are no obvious impact pathways that would bring other sites located beyond 15kms, into consideration.

Stage Y/N Reason

A separate HRA screening assessment will ascertain whether an Appropriate Assessment is required under the Conservation of Habitats and Species Regulations 2010, which relate to Articles 6 (3) and (4) of the Habitats Directives. See Section 6 for HRA Screening.

5. Does the Plan determine the use The draft Plan policies are set out in of small areas at local level OR is it Appendix 1; they seek protection of; a minor modification of a PP subject heritage assets and the historic character to Article 3.2? (Article 3.3) more broadly, the natural environment and community facilities and support a mix of good quality housing that meets the needs of the local community.

Y Once ‘made’ the Plan would form part of the statutory development plan and be used when determining planning applications at the local level. However, the Neighbourhood Plan reflects the broader spatial framework laid out in the Erewash Core Strategy and Saved Local Plan policies in terms of the level and location of new development.

6. Does the Plan set the framework A neighbourhood plan once ‘made’ forms for future development consent of part of the statutory development plan and projects (not just projects in will be used to assess planning annexes to the EIA Directive)? applications and other planning decisions Article 3.4) Y within the Plan Area. Therefore, in conjunction with the Erewash Core Strategy and Saved Local Plan policies, sets the framework for future developments at a local level.

7. Is the Plan’s sole purpose to The Neighbourhood Plan does not have a serve the national defence or civil sole purpose that falls within any of these emergency, OR is it a financial or categories. budget PP, OR is it co-financed by N structural funds or EAGGF programmes 2000 to 2006/7? (Article 3.8, 3.9)

Stage Y/N Reason

8.Is it likely to have a significant A neighbourhood plan could potentially effect on the environment? (Article have an effect on the environment. 3.5) However, whether this is significant depends on the proposals in the Plan.

The focus of the Plan is to shape development to meet local needs and support sustainable development, so that any adverse impacts on the local environment are minimised. The Plan policies seek to conserve and enhance the natural and historic environment. It seeks, for example, to protect and enhance biodiversity through the support of development that integrates and improves existing habitat, protection of N dark skies and the protection of a proposed Local Nature Reserve and Wildlife Corridor. As the Plan, does not allocate sites for housing or other forms of development; does not amend or introduce Limits to Development and has proposed a suite of policies to protect and where possible enhance the built and natural environment, it is considered that it is likely to have a positive impact on the environment. Any potential environmental effects of the Neighbourhood Plan will be determined through stage 2 of this screening assessment. (see figure 4).

2.1.3 The results of the preceding assessment indicate that, depending upon the content of a Neighbourhood Plan, a Strategic Environmental Assessment may be required.

2.1.4 Question 8 in figure 2 refers to whether the Neighbourhood Plan would have a significant effect on the environment. The proposals within the Plan will thus be assessed against the criteria from Annex II of the SEA Directive and Schedule 1 of the Environmental Assessment of Plans and Programmes Regulations (2004)

Figure 4: Little Eaton Neighbourhood Plan and the SEA Directive

Criteria Assessment

(1) The characteristics of the plans, having regard to: (a) the degree to which the plan The Neighbourhood Plan, if made, would form part of sets a framework for projects the statutory development plan. It would set a local and other activities, either with policy framework for development proposals which are regard to the location, nature, local in nature and which the community and size and operating conditions stakeholders consider are important to the sustainable or by allocating resources; development of the Parish and on which the Plan can have the greatest impact.

The Plan sets local criteria by which development proposals which may come forward, should be assessed. It will have a positive influence for the natural and historic environment of the Parish by highlighting those assets that should be protected from any future development and the quality of development expected.

The Plan sits within a wider strategic framework set by the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) 2012 and existing and emerging District-wide local planning policies. It supports, and is in general conformity with, the strategic policies in the Erewash Core Strategy 2011-2028. (b) the degree to which the plan The Neighbourhood Plan sits in the lower tier of the influences other plans and planning policy hierarchy and must be in conformity programmes including those in with the approved Erewash Borough local planning a hierarchy; policies and have regard to the NPPF. It, therefore, supports the implementation of higher tier policies at the neighbourhood level and, as such, is not considered likely to have a significant influence on other plans and programmes. (c) the relevance of the plan for The Neighbourhood Plan, as advocated by the NPPF, the integration of is underpinned by the principles of sustainable development. environmental considerations, in particular with a view to The Plan’s Vision is to support sustainable growth and promoting sustainable development which recognises the area’s most valued development; attributes including its surrounding countryside (greenbelt), wildlife habitats and historical features and the need to sustain a vibrant local economy and engaged local community.

Criteria Assessment

The Vision is supported by 16 Objectives that provide the framework for sustainable development in the Parish by seeking to ensure; housing reflects local character and addresses community need, historic assets are protected; business activities consistent with the character of the village are supported and community facilities, ecological features and dark skies are protected and enhanced. (d) environmental problems The Plan will not introduce any environmental relevant to the plan; and problems; rather it will seek to address and not further exacerbate environmental issues in the Parish. Potential environmental issues identified during the Neighbourhood Planning process include: • increasing pressure nationally for the release of Green Belt sites for development; • noise and air pollution from the nearby A38; • an historic environment; the western boundary of the Parish sitting within the Derwent Valley World Heritage Site, and two Conservation Areas; • the opportunity for enhancement of the historic Little Eaton branch of the Derby Canal, derelict for most of the last century; • areas of the Parish are affected by flooding (high and medium risk. The Plan contains measures to address current and potential environmental problems. These are notably in relation to protecting important ecological sites and wildlife corridor, supporting tree planting to minimise noise and air pollution and identifying and protecting local heritage assets and dark skies. (e) the relevance of the plan for It must be in general conformity with higher-level plans the implementation of that comprise the Erewash Core Strategy 2011-2028 Community legislation on the and the Erewash Local Saved Policies 2005. These environment (e.g. plans linked plans have been developed with regard to European to waste-management or Community legislation on the environment. water protection). Consequently, the policies of the Plan are not considered to be relevant to the implementation of EC legislation.

Criteria Assessment

(2) Characteristics of the effects and of the area likely to be affected, having regard, in particular, to: (a) the probability, duration, The Plan relates to specific, small scale issues frequency and reversibility of ensuring that any future infill development will deliver the effects; the maximum local benefits. It addresses specific local development management issues, complementing the higher level strategic policy framework already established through the adopted Core Strategy and Saved Local Plan policies and national policies (NPPF).

The Plan policies are generally designed to minimise the environmental effects of any new development and to promote sustainable development.

Given that the Plan; does not allocate sites for housing or other development and has proposed a suite of policies to protect and where possible enhance the built and natural environment, the probability of adverse environmental effects is highly unlikely. Overall, it is considered through the application of its policies, the Plan is likely to have neutral and in many cases, positive environmental effects.

In particular: • the Plan promotes the protection of the local natural environment through the support of dark skies and protection of Local Green Spaces and local ecological sites • the Plan promotes the enhancement of the natural environment through support for the planting and management of trees and hedgerows, creation of a buffer zone alongside Bottle Brook and identification of a wildlife corridor • the Plan seeks to protect the local historic environment through the support of development that; demonstrates good quality design that responds to local character, identification of local heritage assets and a Special Character Area. • The nearest European site lies some 15kms from the boundary of the Parish. Given the distance from the boundary, the nature of designation and the

Criteria Assessment

contents of the plan there are no likely significant effects.

The duration of the positive effects outlined above are likely to be long term. However, due to the small scale and nature of the issues considered in the Plan, it is considered any effects will be low in frequency and reversible. (b) the cumulative nature of the The effect of the Plan needs to be considered alongside effects; the adopted Core Strategy and Local Plan Saved policies. The Plan does not propose any development beyond that outlined in the aforementioned borough plans.

The cumulative effects of proposals within the Parish are unlikely to be significant on the local environment.

Any cumulative impacts are likely to be beneficial. (c) the transboundary nature of The Plan establishes locally distinct development the effects; management policies for Little Eaton Parish and thus the majority of effects will be localised to the Plan area.

The exception to this is consideration of biodiversity and wildlife corridors, which has the potential to positively impact on the ecological network, beyond the Parish. (d) the risks to human health or No significant risks to human health or the environment the environment (e.g. due to have been identified. The Plan seeks to create the accidents); conditions to improve human health by providing opportunities for recreation, socialising, active transport, improving road safety and improving air and noise quality. (e) the magnitude and spatial The Neighbourhood Plan is concerned with extent of the effects development within Little Eaton Plan Parish, which has (geographical area and size of a population of 2,557 (2011 Census) and covers an the population likely to be area of 492 hectares. affected); The potential for environmental impacts is likely to be minimal and limited to the Plan area. The exceptions to these are the policies seeking to protect and enhance biodiversity which have the potential to contribute positively to the regional network of habitats.

Criteria Assessment

(f) the value and vulnerability of Little Eaton has important natural characteristics and the area likely to be affected cultural heritage. The Parish, situated partially within due to: the Derwent World Heritage Site has a rich historical (i) special natural characteristics environment including two Conservation Areas and 15 or cultural heritage; Listed Buildings. (ii) exceeded environmental quality standards or limit Development presents the potential for effects upon values; heritage assets and their settings in the Plan area. (iii) intensive land-use; and However, no development is proposed, and the approach to managing effects on heritage is positive. The Plan recognises the value and vulnerability of the local historical character through the application of Policies BE3, BE4 and BE5, which require proposals to respond to local character, protect buildings and structures of local heritage interest and protect and enhance a Special Character Area.

There are no statutorily designated environmental sites. However, there are 7 Local Wildlife Sites and Priority habitats and species present in the Parish.

The Plan highlights these environmental assets and identifies other important local ecological sites that contribute to the broader ecological network.

The Plan will not create conditions for intensive land- use. Development likely to have a detrimental effect on natural and heritage assets will not be supported. (g) the effects on areas or The Plan contains policies which seek to preserve and landscapes which have a enhance the distinct character of the Parish. recognised national, Community or international The Parish partially lies within the Derwent Valley protection status. World Heritage Site/ buffer. The Valley contains a series of 18th and 19th century cotton mills and an industrial landscape of high historical and technological significance.

The Plan does not allocate development, but instead recognises its important role within the Valley as a tourism location. The Plan seeks to protect and where applicable, enhance the historic character of the area.

2.2 SEA Screening Conclusion

2.2.1 This screening report has explored the potential effects of the Little Eaton Neighbourhood Plan with a view to determining the likely requirement for an environmental assessment under the SEA Directive. Based on the SEA Screening Assessment set out in figure 3 above, it is concluded that there are unlikely to be significant environmental effects.

2.2.2 The Little Eaton Neighbourhood Plan is a lower tier plan in the hierarchy of planning documents for the area and therefore has limited influence on other plans or programmes.

2.2.3 The Plan does not allocate any development sites; but instead provides criteria based policies to help guide development that may come forward under the policies set out in the Borough Local Development Framework. The criteria set out for development in the Plan is likely to prove beneficial in terms of mitigating against possible adverse impacts of future development.

2.2.4 The Parish does contain potentially sensitive areas and assets including proximity to a World Heritage Site, two Conservation Areas, 15 listed buildings and 7 Local Wildlife Sites. However, no development is proposed that is likely to have any significant effect on any special areas. The Plan is likely to guard against any possible significant adverse impacts on the built environment arising from future development that might come forward. Policies BE3, BE4 and BE5 in particular address design quality, heritage and character.

2.2.5 Having taken all the policies in the Plan into account, in accordance with the topics cited in Annex 1(f) of the SEA directive, this screening opinion has concluded that a full SEA is not required.

2.3 HRA Screening 2.3.1 Alongside the SEA screening process there is a need to assess whether the Neighbourhood Plan would have an adverse impact upon internationally designated wildlife sites, as required by the European Habitats Directive.

2.3.2 The Habitats Regulations Assessment (HRA) refers to the assessment required for any plan or project to assess the potential impacts against the conservation objectives of Natura 2000 wildlife sites. The assessment must determine whether the plans would adversely affect, or are likely to affect, the integrity of a site(s) in terms of its nature conservation objectives. Where negative effects are identified other options should be examined to avoid any potentially damaging effects.

2.3.3 The HRA process is generally divided into three stages. The initial stage of the HRA process is called the screening stage and determines if there are any likely significant effects or risk of significant effects possible as a result of the implementation of the plan. If there are significant effects the plan will need to

undertake an Appropriate Assessment. The screening process should provide a description of the plan and an identification of the Natura 2000 sites which may be affected by the plan and assess the significance of any possible effects on the identified sites.

2.3.4 There is no pre-defined guidance that dictates the physical scope of a HRA of a Neighbourhood Plan. Therefore, in considering the physical scope of the assessment, we were guided primarily by the identified impact pathways rather than by arbitrary ‘zones’. This study therefore considers potential effects on all European sites within 15km of the Little Eaton Neighbourhood Plan area boundary plus any sites linked to the area through a known ‘pathway.’

2.3.5 The following European designated sites have been identified for consideration within the assessment:

Site name Designation Distance Gang Mine SAC 15km

2.3.6 Figure 5 outlines the qualifying features of the identified European Sites, their conservation objectives and vulnerabilities. Figure 6 is the screening assessment of the policies within the Neighbourhood Plan and their potential effect on the ‘qualifying features’ and vulnerabilities of each European Designated Site.

Figure 5: European Designated Sites

Name Qualifying Conservation Objectives Site Vulnerability of Site Features Gang • Calaminarian Ensure the integrity of the site is maintained or restored as • Grasslands on soils rich in heavy metals are Mine grassland of appropriate, and ensure that the site contributes to vulnerable to air pollution, specifically, the (SAC) the Violetalia achieving the Favourable Conservation Status of its impact of atmospheric nitrogen deposition. calaminariae. Qualifying Features, by maintaining or restoring: • The extent and distribution of qualifying natural habitats • The structure and function (including typical species) of qualifying natural habitats, and • The supporting processes on which qualifying natural habitats rely

2.3.7 Figure 5 outlines the qualifying features of the identified European Sites, their conservation objectives and vulnerabilities. Figure 6 provides an assessment of the likelihood of significant effects on the specific features and environmental conditions of the protected sites by the Little Eaton Neighbourhood Plan, or in combination with other known plans, taking into account the sites conservation objectives.

Figure 6 Habitats Regulation Assessment

Direct habitat Impact on Air quality Water quality Recreational Water Change in Invasive loss protected pressures quantity surrounding species species land use Is the Plan No No No No No No No No likely to impact on this site

Impact as a It is considered given the nature of the Plan policies and the distance of the European Site, that there are unlikely to be any result of the impacts on the Site. The Plan incorporates predominantly positive development management policies, aimed at shaping future Plan development that protects and where possible, enhances the local environment. Thus the impact on the Gang Mine SAC is likely to neutral. Significance It is unlikely, given that the Plan does not allocate any development sites and the distance of the Gang Mine SAC, that the Little of the risk Eaton Neighbourhood Plan would have an impact on the site. Possible A Habitat Regulations screening of the jointly produced Aligned Core Strategies Option for Consultation1 version was completed effects in in September 2010. The outcome of this work was that an Appropriate Assessment was required, but only in relation to assessing significant effects on a European protected site within Gedling. combination with other The Plan does not propose development within the Parish beyond that which is outlined in the Erewash Core Strategy 2011- Plans 2028 and the Saved policies in the Local Plan 2005.

Conclusion No effect

1 Broxtowe Borough, Gedling Borough and Nottingham City Councils

2.4 In combination effects

2.4.1 It is necessary to understand whether the Plan is likely to have significant effects in-combination with other relevant plan or programmes.

2.4.2 A Habitat Regulations screening of the jointly produced Aligned Core Strategies Option for Consultation version was completed in September 2010. The outcome of this work was that an Appropriate Assessment was required, but only in relation to assessing significant effects on a European protected site within Gedling.

2.4.3 The Erewash Core Strategy places much emphasis on focusing development towards the existing urban areas of Long Eaton and Ilkeston. It provides for approximately 300 homes within rural settlement boundaries, including Little Eaton, throughout the Borough.

2.4.4 The Neighbourhood Plan does not identify development beyond that outlined in the borough Local Development Framework. The Plan provides criteria based policies to help guide development that might come forward in accordance with the borough plans.

2.4.5 It is concluded that there are not likely to be significant effects to the European designated sites as a result of in combination effects between the and Neighbourhood Plan at this stage.

2.5 HRA Screening Conclusion

2.5.1 There are no European sites within the boundaries of the Parish. However, there is one European site located within a 15km radius of the Plan area.

2.5.2 It is not considered that the implementation of the Plan, by virtue of its scope, the nature of its policies and proximity will result in any likely significant effects upon qualifying features of the Gang Mine (SAC).

2.5.3 The report also identifies that there are no ‘in combination’ effects as a result of this Plan. The intent of the Plan is to ensure that any development proposed through the emerging Local Plan protects the natural and built assets. The Plan is therefore unlikely to exacerbate vulnerabilities of the European sites through pollution, visitor disturbance and recreation.

3.0 Conclusion

3.1 The SEA screening finds that no significant effects are likely as a result of the implementation of the Neighbourhood Plan. On this basis, a full SEA will not be required to be undertaken.

3.2 The HRA screening finds that no significant adverse effects are likely as the result of the implementation of the Neighbourhood Plan. It is not necessary to prepare an Appropriate Assessment, as part of the Little Eaton Neighbourhood Plan preparation.

Appendix A: Little Eaton Neighbourhood Plan Policies

POLICY BE1: HOUSING PROVISION

Development proposals for small windfall sites (normally less than five dwellings) within the built-up part of Little Eaton (i.e. outside the Green Belt) will be supported where they are in accordance with the relevant policies set out in the Plan and with the Borough Council’s Local Plan policies.

POLICY BE2: HOUSING MIX

Proposals for new housing development will be required to reflect how they relate to the identified housing need in Appendix 5, or the needs identified in a more up-to-date assessment of housing need. This should include and prioritise smaller homes (two or three bedrooms), homes to suit older people and first-time home buyers to meet a local need. There should be a general presumption against larger homes (4 or more bedrooms).

POLICY BE3: GOOD DESIGN

Development proposals should demonstrate good quality design which responds to and integrates with local surroundings, heritage and landscaping. Development proposals will be supported where good design principles are achieved. Good design in Little Eaton especially means: a) the design and layout of the development is sympathetic to and reinforces local character in terms of its proportion, form, massing, density, height, size, scale, materials and detailed design features; b) it will not result in a net loss of trees, hedges or other natural features and heritage assets that form part of the character of Little Eaton or are important for nature conservation and/or flood defence; c) the use of previously developed (i.e. ‘brownfield’) land has been prioritised; d) there will be no resulting increase in the risk of flooding upstream or downstream; and there will be suitable measures to ensure that surface water is managed in such a way as not to exacerbate, and where possible reduce, existing flooding problems either within the site or any developments in Little Eaton; e) development is normally not sited in areas of flood risk; if it is, then it should be designed to ensure that the development is safe for its lifetime and does not increase flood risk to the site or to others. f) attractive, safe, secure and accessible buildings and spaces, that are easy to traverse for all, particularly for older people and those with disabilities; and g) no reduction in garden/Local Green Space to an extent where it adversely affects the distinctive character of Little Eaton or the amenity of the proposed occupiers of the new development or adjacent properties/uses. Developers are encouraged to engage with the Parish Council prior to the preparation of any planning application to confirm these principles.

POLICY BE4: CHARACTER BUILDINGS AND STRUCTURES OF LOCAL HERITAGE INTEREST

The Plan identifies the buildings and structures listed below as Little Eaton Character Buildings and Structures of local Heritage Interest (See Appendix 7) 1. Park Farm and Dove Barn, Vicarage Lane. 2. The Anchor Inn, Alfreton Road. 3. Holme Cottage, 67 Duffield Road. 4. Wyndesmore. 5. Park View Cottages. 6. The New Inn, Duffield Road. 7. Mill Green cottages and agricultural outbuildings. 8. The Bell and Harp Inn, Alfreton Road. 9. Sycamore Cottage, 42 Whittaker Lane. 10. Edgehill Eaton Bank. 11. The Grove, Duffield Road. 12. The United Reform Church, Alfreton Road. 13. The Methodist Church, Alfreton Road. 14. The Primary School. 15. Eaton Hill and Lodge Alfreton Road. 16. Hierons Wood, Vicarage Lane. 17. 6 Eaton Bank. 18. Rigga Lane Quarry. 19. The Alms Houses, Church Lane. 20. The Old Post Office. 21. 206 Alfreton Road. 22. 195 – 199 Alfreton Road. 23. The Shoemakers Cottage, 187 Alfreton Road.

Development proposals will be required to consider the character, context and setting of Little Eaton Character Buildings and Structures of Local Heritage Interest including important views towards and from the assets. Development will be required to be designed appropriately, taking account of local styles, materials and detail. The loss of, or substantial harm to, a locally important asset will be resisted unless the harm or loss is outweighed by a substantial public benefit or exceptional circumstances can be demonstrated.

POLICY BE5: ALFRETON ROAD SPECIAL CHARACTER AREA

Within the proposed Alfreton Road Special Character Area, as identified in Figure 2 on page 31, development proposals should be of good quality and must be designed so as to conserve and enhance their distinctive local character, having regard to scale, density, height, landscape, layout, materials and access.

POLICY BE6: TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT

The provision of traffic management solutions to address the impact of traffic arising from development in Little Eaton will be supported through the following approach: 1. Undertake a Traffic & Highway assessment to inform the re-design at Little Eaton Town and Alfreton Road to improve safety for local people; minimise inconvenience to parents of school children and customers of the shops and café; facilitate an increase in the numbers of people walking or cycling; improve the attractiveness of the area; and avoid potential disruption to the emergency services. The survey should include provision for parking and; 2. Implement recommendations within the traffic assessment.

The provision of traffic management solutions to address the impact of traffic arising from development in Little Eaton will be supported. This includes either directly provided solutions or the use of developer contributions to fund the cost of improvements.

A survey should be commissioned, in and around the intersection of The Town and Alfreton Road. The recommendations, from this survey, should be implemented.

POLICY BE7: DEVELOPER CONTRIBUTIONS Where appropriate, contributions towards those policies and proposals identified in the Plan will be sought through planning obligations (under s.106 of the Town and Country Planning Act) in accordance with the tests as set out in the Community Infrastructure Levy Regulations 2010.

Developers are encouraged to engage with the Parish Council prior to the preparation of any planning application to confirm these local priorities, ensuring that, where appropriate and viable, the facilities proposed to complement any development proposals reflect these aspirations.

POLICY LF1: PROTECTION OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES

Development proposals that result in the loss of, or have a significant adverse effect on, a community facility will only be supported where the building or facility is replaced by an equivalent or by better provision in terms of quality and quantity in an equally suitable location, or it can be clearly demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Borough Council, in consultation with the Parish Council, that the service or facility is unviable or no longer required by the community.

The following facilities, identified below are considered to be especially important to the community:

• Little Eaton Village Hall. • Parish Rooms.

• OAP Hall, Barley Close. • Little Eaton village school. • Pharmacy. • Doctors’ Surgery. • Post Office.

POLICY LF2: ENHANCEMENT OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES

The Plan supports the enhancement of facilities at St Peters Park and the Village Hall to meet the community and leisure needs of local residents.

POLICY LF3: LITTLE EATON VILLAGE CENTRE

The Little Eaton Village Centre (as identified in Figure 3 on page 44) will be maintained and enhanced. Within this area: a) Shops (Use Classes A1); Financial and Professional Services (Use Class A2); Restaurants and Cafes (Use Class A3) and Community and Leisure Facilities (Use Class D2) will be the predominant ground floor use. b) Development proposals that involve the loss of a shop unit (Use Classes A1, A2, A3, A4 and A5) will only be supported where it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Borough Council in consultation with the Parish Council, that: i. Its continued identified use is no longer viable and the building has been appropriately marketed for at least six continual months; or ii. The proposed use will make a positive contribution to the viability and vitality of the Village Centre. c) Development proposals for other uses appropriate to a Village Centre (defined as places to eat and drink (Use Class A4), hot food takeaways (Use Class A5) and non- residential uses (Use Class D1) will be supported where it can be demonstrated to the Borough Council, in consultation with the Parish Council, that it makes a positive contribution to the viability, vitality and attractiveness of the Village Centre.

POLICY LF4: IMPROVED ACCESS FOR PEOPLE OF LIMITED MOBILITY

The Plan supports proposals which would enhance access to facilities by people in wheelchairs, blue badge holders and parents with prams and pushchairs. It supports the provision of parking spaces for blue badge holders and the widening of footpaths and lowering of kerbs.

POLICY LF5: FOOTPATHS AND CYCLEWAYS

The Plan supports proposals which enhance and expand the present network of walking and cycling routes to ensure that residents and visitors are able to travel safely and conveniently to services and amenities within Little Eaton and surrounding areas. In particular:

a) Development proposals should integrate with and enhance the existing network of footpaths and cycleways.

b) The Plan especially supports the development of a ‘Greenway’ and of footpath/cycle path/bridleway links to the Derwent Valley Bridleway.

POLICY LF6: TOURISM Proposals for the re-use or conversion of an existing building will be supported where they enhance the offer of leisure and tourism facilities by demonstrating contributions to the local economy. In particular an application should:

a) Demonstrate a long term business plan to support tourism growth in Little Eaton;

b) Be of a scale and location that is sympathetic to and respects its local character including its natural and historic built assets; and

c) Would not create a significant adverse impact on road safety and the network of roads through additional traffic movements and parking.

Leisure and tourism related development that necessitates a rural location will be supported where they can demonstrate:

a) any necessary built facilities will be provided by the re-use of existing buildings or, where the re-use of existing buildings is not feasible, new buildings are located and designed to minimise their impact upon the character and appearance of the countryside;

b) they are viable as a long-term business;

c) the scale, design and form of the proposal, in terms of both buildings and operation, will be appropriate for its location and setting and be compatible with surrounding land uses; and

d) they will not create significant or exacerbate existing environmental or highway safety problem.

POLICY NE1: BIODIVERSITY

Development proposals that conserve or enhance biodiversity, and incorporate biodiversity in and around them should be permitted. Development proposals should promote preservation, restoration and recreation of priority habitats, ecological networks and the protection and recovery of priority species populations where applicable. Development proposals that cannot avoid (through locating an alternative site with less harmful impacts), adequately mitigate, or, as a last resort, compensate for the loss of a locally or nationally identified site of biodiversity value should be refused.

POLICY NE2: DARK SKIES

Any development must limit the impact of light pollution from artificial, externally visible light sources. Any proposals to install lighting in areas of the Parish, that are currently dark at night, will be resisted. Dark at night is defined as more than 50m from an existing street light.

External lighting should be designed to reduce the impact on dark skies, avoiding excessive use of lighting or the unintentional illumination of adjacent areas..

POLICY NE3: REDUCING POLLUTION

Proposals and measures to reduce the existing levels of air and noise pollution, from the A38, will be encouraged; for example, through a band of trees and other vegetation, at least ten metres wide, between the A38 and Little Eaton village.

POLICY NE4: BOTTLE BROOK

A buffer zone adjacent to each side of Bottle Brook, of 3 metres wide in the built-up area (south of Jack O’Darley Bridge to just south of the Outrams Wharf Business Park) and 10 metres wide outside of that, will be maintained and promoted as an informal recreational, biodiversity and flood defence resource. Development proposals which would adversely affect the recreational, biodiversity and flood defence role and function of this buffer will only be supported in exceptional circumstances where there are clear and convincing benefits of the development that clearly outweigh the potential harm. Any proposed development in the built- up area (south of Jack O’Darley Bridge to just south of the Outrams Wharf site), where the development land is situated within 8m of Bottle Brook, should look to restore an 8m buffer zone to the Bottle Brook, if reasonable and practical to do so.

POLICY NE5: LOCAL GREEN SPACES

The sites listed below and shown in Figure 5 are designated as Local Green Spaces, where development will only be supported in very special circumstances where it is consistent with the function of the Local Green Space.

▪ The Derby Canal. ▪ Bottle Brook. ▪ Drum Hill. ▪ Moor Lane. ▪ Hatherings/Hierons Wood. ▪ Rigga Lane. ▪ Outwoods. ▪ St Peters Park. ▪ Croft Corner/Mill Green. ▪ The Village Green.

POLICY NE6: TREES

The Plan supports the planting and management of trees.

Wherever it is practical, development proposals should retain trees and hedgerows of good quality and/or visual significance, or which are likely to become visually significant when a site is developed or have been identified as being of historic importance.

Where it is not practical to retain significant trees and hedgerows of good quality and/or visual significance, and the benefits of the development justify their loss, replacement planting, preferably on-site, should be provided.

The trees and woodlands along the main road, into and out of the village, are especially important to character and amenity.

POLICY B1: PROTECT EMPLOYMENT USES

Development proposals, that result in the loss of an existing employment use, will only be supported where it is ancillary to the use, or it has been demonstrated that its use for employment purposes is not viable and that all reasonable steps have been taken to let or sell the site or building for employment purposes for a period of least 6 months.

POLICY B2: DUFFIELD ROAD SITE

The land to the south of Duffield Road, between Alfreton Road and Bottle Brook and contiguous with the Outrams Wharf site, is identified as an employment area. Within this designated area, land will be safeguarded for business uses (defined as Use Classes B1, B2, and B8 as well as D1 and D2). All new employment development proposals should respect and be compatible with local character and uses.

POLICY B3: OUTRAMS WHARF SITE

Development proposals for a modest expansion and new development of employment uses, on the Outrams Wharf site, will be supported in order to benefit the local economy. Developments should be designed to mitigate the effects of any unacceptable noise or fumes; to respect and be compatible with the local character and uses; and improve road and pedestrian safety or the free flow of traffic.

POLICY B4: OLD HALL MILL BUSINESS PARK

Measures that improve the site’s visual attractiveness and highway and pedestrian safety in and around it will be supported.

Appendix B: Annex I Projects

1. Crude-oil refineries (excluding undertakings manufacturing only lubricants from crude oil) and installations for the gasification and liquefaction of 500 tonnes or more of coal or bituminous shale per day. 2. Thermal power stations and other combustion installations with a heat output of 300 megawatts or more, and nuclear power stations and other nuclear reactors (except research installations for the production and conversion of fissionable and fertile materials, whose maximum power does not exceed 1 kilowatt continuous thermal load). 3. (a) Installations for the reprocessing of irradiated nuclear fuel (b) Installations designed:- • for the production or enrichment of nuclear fuel, • for the processing of irradiated nuclear fuel or high-level radioactive waste, • for the final disposal of irradiated nuclear fuel, • solely for the final disposal of radioactive waste, • solely for the storage (planned for more than 10 years) of irradiated nuclear fuels or • radioactive waste in a different site than the production site. 4. (a) Integrated works for the initial smelting of cast-iron and steel (b) Installations for the production of non-ferrous crude metals from ore, concentrates or secondary raw materials by metallurgical, chemical or electrolytic processes. 5. Installations for the extraction of asbestos and for the processing and transformation of asbestos and products containing asbestos: for asbestos-cement products, with an annual production of more than 20 000 tonnes of finished products, for friction material, with an annual production of more than 50 tonnes of finished products, and for other uses of asbestos, utilization of more than 200 tonnes per year. 6. Integrated chemical installations, i.e. those installations for the manufacture on an industrial scale of substances using chemical conversion processes, in which several units are juxtaposed and are functionally linked to one another and which are: i) for the production of basic organic chemicals; ii) for the production of basic inorganic chemicals; iii) for the production of phosphorous-, nitrogen- or potassium-based fertilizers (simple or compound fertilizers); iv) for the production of basic plant health products and of biocides; v) for the production of basic pharmaceutical products using a chemical or biological process; vi) for the production of explosives. 7. (a) Construction of lines for long-distance railway traffic and of airports with a basic runway length of 2,100 m or more; (b) Construction of motorways and express roads (c) Construction of a new road of four or more lanes, or realignment and/or widening of an existing road of two lanes or less so as to provide four or more lanes, where such new road, or realigned and/or widened section of road would be 10 km or more in a continuous length.

8. (a) Inland waterways and ports for inland-waterway traffic which permit the passage of vessels of over 1 350 tonnes; (b) Trading ports, piers for loading and unloading connected to land and outside ports (excluding ferry piers) which can take vessels of over 1 350 tonnes. 9. Waste disposal installations for the incineration, chemical treatment as defined in Annex IIA to Directive 75/442/EEC (3) under heading D9, or landfill of hazardous waste (i.e. waste to which Directive 91/689/EEC (4) applies). 10. Waste disposal installations for the incineration or chemical treatment as defined in Annex IIA to Directive 75/442/EEC under heading D9 of non-hazardous waste with a capacity exceeding 100 tonnes per day. 11. Groundwater abstraction or artificial groundwater recharge schemes where the annual volume of water abstracted or recharged is equivalent to or exceeds 10 million cubic metres. 12. (a) Works for the transfer of water resources between river basins where this transfer aims at preventing possible shortages of water and where the amount of water transferred exceeds 100 million cubic metres/year; (b) In all other cases, works for the transfer of water resources between river basins where the multi-annual average flow of the basin of abstraction exceeds 2 000 million cubic metres/year and where the amount of water transferred exceeds 5 % of this flow. In both cases transfers of piped drinking water are excluded. 13. Waste water treatment plants with a capacity exceeding 150 000 population equivalent as defined in Article 2 point (6) of Directive 91/271/EEC (5). 14. Extraction of petroleum and natural gas for commercial purposes where the amount extracted exceeds 500 tonnes/day in the case of petroleum and 500 000 m3/day in the case of gas. 15. Dams and other installations designed for the holding back or permanent storage of water, where a new or additional amount of water held back or stored exceeds 10 million cubic metres. 16. Pipelines for the transport of gas, oil or chemicals with a diameter of more than 800 mm and a length of more than 40 km. 17. Installations for the intensive rearing of poultry or pigs with more than: (a) 85 000 places for broilers, 60 000 places for hens; (b) 3 000 places for production pigs (over 30 kg); or (c) 900 places for sows. 18. Industrial plants for the (a) production of pulp from timber or similar fibrous materials; (b) production of paper and board with a production capacity exceeding 200 tonnes per day. 19. Quarries and open-cast mining where the surface of the site exceeds 25 hectares, or peat extraction, where the surface of the site exceeds 150 hectares. 20. Construction of overhead electrical power lines with a voltage of 220 kV or more and a length of more than 15 km. 21. Installations for storage of petroleum, petrochemical, or chemical products with a capacity of 200,000 tonnes or more

Annex II Projects

1. Agriculture, silviculture and aquaculture (a) Projects for the restructuring of rural land holdings; (b) Projects for the use of uncultivated land or semi-natural areas for intensive agricultural purposes; (c) Water management projects for agriculture, including irrigation and land drainage projects; (d) Initial afforestation and deforestation for the purposes of conversion to another type of land use; (e) Intensive livestock installations (projects not included in Annex I); (f) Intensive fish farming; (g) Reclamation of land from the sea.

2. Extractive industry (a) Quarries, open-cast mining and peat extraction (projects not included in Annex I); (b) Underground mining; (c) Extraction of minerals by marine or fluvial dredging; (d) Deep drillings, in particular: • geothermal drilling, • drilling for the storage of nuclear waste material, • drilling for water supplies; (e) Surface industrial installations for the extraction of coal, petroleum, natural gas and ores, as well as bituminous shale.

3. Energy industry (a) Industrial installations for the production of electricity, steam and hot water (projects not included in Annex I); (b) Industrial installations for carrying gas, steam and hot water; transmission of electrical energy by overhead cables (projects not included in Annex I); (c) Surface storage of natural gas; (d) Underground storage of combustible gases; (e) Surface storage of fossil fuels; (f) Industrial briquetting of coal and lignite; (g) Installations for the processing and storage of radioactive waste (unless included in Annex I); (h) Installations for hydroelectric energy production; (i) Installations for the harnessing of wind power for energy production (wind farms).

4. Production and processing of metals (a) Installations for the production of pig iron or steel (primary or secondary fusion) including continuous casting; (b) Installations for the processing of ferrous metals: (i) hot-rolling mills; (ii) smithies with hammers; (iii) application of protective fused metal coats;

(c) Ferrous metal foundries; (d) Installations for the smelting, including the alloyage, of non-ferrous metals, excluding precious metals, including recovered products (refining, foundry casting, etc.); (e) Installations for surface treatment of metals and plastic materials using an electrolytic or chemical process; (f) Manufacture and assembly of motor vehicles and manufacture of motor-vehicle engines; (g) Shipyards; (h) Installations for the construction and repair of aircraft; (i) Manufacture of railway equipment; (j) Swaging by explosives; (k) Installations for the roasting and sintering of metallic ores.

5. Mineral industry (a) Coke ovens (dry coal distillation); (b) Installations for the manufacture of cement; (c) Installations for the production of asbestos and the manufacture of asbestos-products (projects not included in Annex I); (d) Installations for the manufacture of glass including glass fibre; (e) Installations for smelting mineral substances including the production of mineral fibres; (f) Manufacture of ceramic products by burning, in particular roofing tiles, bricks, refractory bricks, tiles, stoneware or porcelain.

6. Chemical industry (Projects not included in Annex I) (a) Treatment of intermediate products and production of chemicals; (b) Production of pesticides and pharmaceutical products, paint and varnishes, elastomers and peroxides; (c) Storage facilities for petroleum, petrochemical and chemical products.

7. Food industry (a) Manufacture of vegetable and animal oils and fats; (b) Packing and canning of animal and vegetable products; (c) Manufacture of dairy products; (d) Brewing and malting; (e) Confectionery and syrup manufacture; (f) Installations for the slaughter of animals; (g) Industrial starch manufacturing installations; (h) Fish-meal and fish-oil factories; (i) Sugar factories.

8. Textile, leather, wood and paper industries (a) Industrial plants for the production of paper and board (projects not included in Annex I); (b) Plants for the pre-treatment (operations such as washing, bleaching, mercerization) or dyeing of fibres or textiles; (c) Plants for the tanning of hides and skins;

(d) Cellulose-processing and production installations.

9. Rubber industry - Manufacture and treatment of elastomer-based products.

10. Infrastructure projects (a) Industrial estate development projects; (b) Urban development projects, including the construction of shopping centres and car parks; (c) Construction of railways and intermodal trans-shipment facilities, and of intermodal terminals (projects not included in Annex I); (d) Construction of airfields (projects not included in Annex I); (e) Construction of roads, harbours and port installations, including fishing harbours (projects not included in Annex I); (f) Inland-waterway construction not included in Annex I, canalisation and flood-relief works; (g) Dams and other installations designed to hold water or store it on a long-term basis (projects not included in Annex I); (h) Tramways, elevated and underground railways, suspended lines or similar lines of a particular type, used exclusively or mainly for passenger transport; (i) Oil and gas pipeline installations (projects not included in Annex I); (j) Installations of long-distance aqueducts; (k) Coastal work to combat erosion and maritime works capable of altering the coast through the construction, for example, of dykes, moles, jetties and other sea defence works, excluding the maintenance and reconstruction of such works; (l) Groundwater abstraction and artificial groundwater recharge schemes not included in Annex I; (m) Works for the transfer of water resources between river basins not included in Annex I.

11. Other projects (a) Permanent racing and test tracks for motorised vehicles; (b) Installations for the disposal of waste (projects not included in Annex I); (c) Waste-water treatment plants (projects not included in Annex I); (d) Sludge-deposition sites; (e) Storage of scrap iron, including scrap vehicles; (f) Test benches for engines, turbines or reactors; (g) Installations for the manufacture of artificial mineral fibres; (h) Installations for the recovery or destruction of explosive substances; (i) Knackers' yards.

12. Tourism and leisure (a) Ski-runs, ski-lifts and cable-cars and associated developments; (b) Marinas; (c) Holiday villages and hotel complexes outside urban areas and associated developments; (d) Permanent camp sites and caravan sites;

(e) Theme parks.

13. Any change or extension of projects listed in Annex I or Annex II, already authorised, executed or in the process of being executed, which may have significant adverse effects on the environment; Projects in Annex I, undertaken exclusively or mainly for the development and testing of new methods or products and not used for more than two years.