DOCSLIB.ORG

A38 Derby Junctions TR010022 Volume 6 6.1 Environmental

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A38 Derby Junctions TR010022 Volume 6 6.1 Environmental Infrastructure Planning Planning Act 2008 The Infrastructure Planning (Applications: A38Prescribed Derby Junctions Forms and Procedure) Regulations 2009 TR010022 Volume 6 6.1A38 DerbyEnvironmental Junctions Statement Development Consent Order 202[ ] Chapter 6 – Cultural Heritage 6.1 Environmental Statement Chapter 1 Introduction Regulation 5(2)(a) Planning Act 2008 Regulation Number Regulation 5(2)(a) Planning Inspectorate SchemeInfrastructureTR010022 Planning (Applications: Prescribed Reference Forms and Procedure) Regulations 2009 Application Document Reference 6.1 Author A38 Derby Junctions AECOM Project Team and Highways England April 2019 Version Date Status of Version 1 April 2019 DCO Application ERROR! NO DOCUMENT VARIABLE SUPPLIED. A38 Derby Junctions Environmental Statement Infrastructure Planning Planning Act 2008 The Infrastructure Planning (Applications: Prescribed Forms and Procedure) Regulations 2009 A38 Derby Junctions Development Consent Order 202[ ] 6.1 Environmental Statement Chapter 6 Cultural Heritage Regulation Number Regulation 5(2)(a) Planning Inspectorate Scheme TR010022 Reference Application Document Reference 6.1 Author A38 Derby Junctions Project Team, Highways England Version Date Status of Version 1 April 2019 DCO Application Planning Inspectorate Scheme Ref: TR010022 Application Document Ref: TR010022/APP/6.1 A38 Derby Junctions Environmental Statement Table of Contents Chapter Page 6. Cultural Heritage ................................................................................................. 1 6.1. Introduction and competent expert evidence ........................................................ 1 6.2. Legislative and policy framework .......................................................................... 1 6.3. Assessment methodology ..................................................................................... 5 6.4. Consultation ........................................................................................................ 14 6.5. Assessment assumptions and limitations ............................................................ 16 6.6. Study area ........................................................................................................... 20 6.7. Previous investigations close to the Scheme ...................................................... 20 6.8. Historic map regression ...................................................................................... 23 6.9. Cultural heritage baseline ................................................................................... 27 6.10. Historic buildings ................................................................................................. 38 6.11. Historic landscape ............................................................................................... 53 6.12. Future baseline ................................................................................................... 61 6.13. Potential impacts ................................................................................................. 62 6.14. Design, mitigation and enhancement measures ................................................. 63 6.15. Assessment of likely significant effects ............................................................... 70 6.16. Monitoring ........................................................................................................... 78 6.17. Summary of assessment ..................................................................................... 78 6.18. References .......................................................................................................... 88 List of Tables Table 6.1: Relevant NPSNN policies for the cultural heritage assessment .......................... 2 Table 6.2: Criteria to determine the value of heritage assets ............................................... 8 Table 6.3: Factors in the assessment of magnitude of impact: archaeological remains ...... 9 Table 6.4: Factors in the assessment of magnitude of impact: historic buildings ............... 10 Table 6.5: Factors in the assessment of magnitude of impact: historic landscape ............ 10 Table 6.6: Significance of effect matrix .............................................................................. 11 Table 6.7: Scoping opinion and response .......................................................................... 13 Table 6.8: Consultee comments ........................................................................................ 15 Table 6.9: Consultee comments on the PEIR .................................................................... 17 Table 6.10: Archaeological mitigation measures ............................................................... 68 Table 6.11: Cultural heritage - summary of effects (refer to Figures 6.1 to 6.6 and Figures 6.8 to 6.9 [TR010022/APP/6.2]) ........................................................................................ 80 Planning Inspectorate Scheme Ref: TR010022 Application Document Ref: TR010022/APP/6.1 A38 Derby Junctions Environmental Statement List of Figures [TR010022/APP/6.2] Figure 6.1: Kingsway Junction – Location of Designated and Non-designated Heritage Assets Figure 6.2: Markeaton Junction – Location of Designated and Non-designated Heritage Assets Figure 6.3: Friar Gate Conservation Areas – Location of Designated and Non-designated Heritage Assets Figure 6.4: Kedleston Hall Park and Garden – Location of Designated and Non-designated Heritage Assets Figure 6.5: Little Eaton Junction – Location of Designated and Non-designated Heritage Assets Figure 6.6: Little Eaton Junction – Location of Designated and Non-designated Heritage Assets Figure 6.7: Little Eaton Junction – LIDAR Data Figure 6.8: Kingsway and Markeaton – Historic Landscape Character Areas Figure 6.9: Little Eaton Junction – Historic Landscape Character Areas List of Appendices [TR010022/APP/6.3] Appendix 6.1: Heritage Impact Assessment (HIA) for Derwent Valley Mills World Heritage Site Appendix 6.2: Gazetteer of cultural heritage assets Appendix 6.3: Plates Planning Inspectorate Scheme Ref: TR010022 Application Document Ref: TR010022/APP/6.1 A38 Derby Junctions Environmental Statement 6. Cultural Heritage 6.1. Introduction and competent expert evidence 6.1.1. This chapter assesses the potential cultural heritage impacts associated with the construction and operation of the Scheme, following the methodology set out in Design Manual for Roads and Bridges (DMRB) Volume 11, Section 3, Part 2 (HA 208/07) (Highways Agency, 2007a). This chapter summarises the regulatory and policy framework related to cultural heritage, details the methodology followed for the assessment and describes the existing environment in the area surrounding the Scheme. Following this, the design and mitigation measures proposed to manage and minimise potential impacts are specified, after which residual cultural heritage effects of the Scheme are presented. Assumptions and limitations made during the assessment are provided in Section 6.5. 6.1.2. A key focus of this cultural heritage impact assessment concerns the Scheme impacts upon the Derwent Valley Mills World Heritage Site (WHS) which is located to the west of the existing Little Eaton junction, with some parts of the Scheme being located within the WHS boundary. Thus, in addition to presenting the findings of the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) in respect of cultural heritage, this chapter also incorporates a Heritage Impact Assessment (HIA) which specifically addresses the impacts of the Scheme upon the Outstanding Universal Value (OUV) of the Derwent Valley Mills WHS (refer to Appendix 6.1 [TR010022/APP/6.3]). 6.1.3. This chapter is also supported by a gazetteer of cultural heritage assets provided in Appendix 6.2 [TR010022/APP/6.3], whilst Appendix 6.3 [TR010022/APP/6.3] provides a range of maps, plans, photos of relevance to the assessment. 6.1.4. All figures cited within this chapter are included within Environmental Statement (ES) Volume 2 [TR010022/APP/6.2]. 6.1.5. This chapter of the ES has been prepared by competent experts with relevant and appropriate experience. The technical lead for the cultural heritage assessment has 25 years of relevant experience and has professional qualifications as summarised in Appendix 1.1 [TR010022/APP/6.3]. 6.2. Legislative and policy framework 6.2.1. As discussed in Chapter 1: Introduction, the primary basis for deciding whether or not to grant a Development Consent Order (DCO) is the National Policy Statement for National Networks (NPSNN) (Department for Transport (DfT), 2014). NPSNN Sections 4 and 5 set out policies to guide how DCO applications will be decided and how the impacts of national networks infrastructure should be considered. Table 6.1 identifies the NPSNN policies relevant to the cultural heritage assessment and where in this ES chapter information is provided to address these policy requirements. Planning Inspectorate Scheme Ref: TR010022 Application Document Ref: TR010022/APP/6.1 1 A38 Derby Junctions Environmental Statement Table 6.1: Relevant NPSNN policies for the cultural heritage assessment Relevant Requirement of the NPSNN Location where NPSNN para. information addresses Ref. policy requirements 5.124 Non-designated assets of archaeological Non-designated assets interest that are demonstrably of equivalent are considered in this significance to scheduled monuments should assessment. See para. be considered subject to the policies for 6.3.12, Table 6.2
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Invertebrate Survey of the A30 and A38 Road Verges in Area 1 (Cornwall and Devon) Steven Falk Mark Tunmore October 2015
    Inspiring change for Important Invertebrate Areas in the UK Invertebrate Survey of the A30 and A38 road verges in Area 1 (Cornwall and Devon) 11th September 2014 Susan Thompson - Grants & Trusts Officer Steven Falk Mark Tunmore Saving the small things that run the planet October 2015 1 Executive summary Between late May and late August 2015, Buglife Services carried out an invertebrate survey of the A30 and A38 in Devon and Cornwall. 41 visits to 23 sample points were undertaken on the A30 and 25 visits to 18 sampling points were undertaken on the A38, and a range of invertebrate groups were targeted. 866 taxa were recorded, the list being dominated by flies (361), beetles (177), butterflies & moths (109), bugs (82), bees, ants & aculeate wasps (53), spiders & harvestmen (50), grasshoppers & crickets (11) and dragonflies & damselflies (11). Pitfall trapping (not permitted) would have extended the beetle and bug lists greatly. The list included a number of rare and scarce species (notably the tachinid fly Policheta unicolor and lygaeid bug Trapezonotus ullrichi) and seemingly the first SW England record for the Southern oak bush-cricket (Meconema meridionalis) which is a recent British colonist. The list reveals the tremendous variety of life cycle strategies and other ecological relationships associated with road verge invertebrates. Pollinators are very well represented within the species list. The list and sample sizes reveal the strong influence of surrounding habitat, geographic location, altitude and underlying geology/ground conditions. There is a discernible ‘Bodmin Moor effect’ (decreased abundance and diversity of thermophilic invertebrates with altitude) and a strong ‘Dartmoor effect’ (increased abundance and diversity of thermophilic invertebrates on the A38 east of Dartmoor).
    [Show full text]
  • A38 Derby Junctions Scheme—Little Eaton Junction
    A38 DERBY JUNCTIONS SCHEME—LITTLE EATON JUNCTION. APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT CONSENT ORDER. WRITTEN REPRESENTATIONS BY BREADSALL PARISH COUNCIL TO THE EXAMINING AUTHORITY Part 1. Selection of the preferred route Breadsall Parish Council believes that the process by which Highways England (HE) and its predecessor the Highways Agency (HA) selected the preferred route for the Little Eaton junction was deeply flawed. As a result, the selection of the preferred route should be completely re-examined before the current Development Consent Order is processed. The selection process for the preferred route is described in Highways England’s own document “A38 Derby Junctions Scheme Assessment Report (PCF Stage 2)” a copy of which is attached. See especially section 5. BPC’s comments below quote paragraph numbers from this report. Much of the same material is contained in the “6.1 Environmental Statement Chapter 3 -Scheme history and assessment of alternatives” submitted by HE as part of the DCO application In highway terms the obvious way to re-design the Little Eaton junction is to route the A38 to the north of the present junction. This is the shortest and most direct route for the A38, and this was indeed the basis for options 1 and 2 originally proposed by the HA in 2002 (See para 5.4.1). In 2003 HA held a public consultation exercise based on revised high-speed versions of options 1 and 2 and a new third option routed to the south of the present junction (See para 5.4.6). In 2004 HA decided “on balance” to support the third option which is the basis of the current scheme.
    [Show full text]
  • September (2017)
    Take Heart (Derby) A social support group for heart patients, their families and carers. www.takeheartderby.co.uk Registered Charity No 1163703 Newsletter September 2017 Lunch at The Bridge. This venue is one of our favourites, possibly because it is a two4one and we love to get value for money. I am not sure who the odd one out was but seventeen members and guests dined at The Bridge Inn, Duffield last month. There were two dissenting voices about the quality of food but for the remainder, well just look at the clean plates being taken back to the kitchen. Michael made his recommendation to those around him and it turned up trumps again. A juicy rib-eye steak was consumed with relish but there is an extensive menu available from which to choose. There was much amiable chatter during the meal, some confirming their holiday arrangements whilst others spoke of baby-sitting their grandchildren. Black Bra (as told by a woman). I had lunch with 2 of my unmarried friends. One is engaged, one is a mistress, and I have been married for 20+ years. We were chatting about our relationships and decided to amaze our men by greeting them at the door wearing a black bra, stiletto heels and a mask over our eyes. We agreed to meet in a few days to exchange notes. Here's how it all went ... My engaged friend: The other night when my boyfriend came over he found me with a black leather bodice, tall stilettos and a mask. He saw me and said, 'You are the woman of my dreams...I love you.' Then we made passionate love all night long.
    [Show full text]
  • Dear Friends Martin Repton
    Dear Friends The next Darley Neighbourhood Forum will take place on: Wednesday 10 October 2012 at Landau Forte College, Fox Street Making Darley Stronger and Safer The Darley Forum meets every three months and aims to give residents an opportunity to have a say on issues that affect the local community. The meeting will be attended by your three local ward Councillors and officers from a variety of local service providers. The Safer Neighbourhood Team will be available from 6:30 for one to one discussions and will provide an update on activities in Darley. You will also be able to discuss Darley Safer Neighbourhood Team Policing priorities. People from Derby Council’s planning department will be available from 6.30 to 7.00pm to consult with you on the Derby Core Strategy, an important planning document that determines development strategy for the next 15 years. What’s happening in Darley As always you will have the opportunity to meet other people who care about the Darley neighbourhood and raise your views and concerns relating to Darley This booklet includes: a copy of the agenda for the 10th October, ‘You said we did’ feedback from the last meeting, an update on Board activity and useful contact details. If you are unable to attend and would like more information please contact one of your local Councillors: Councillor Jack Stanton, telephone 07812 301755, [email protected] Councillor Martin Repton, telephone 01332 206095, [email protected] Councillor Lorraine Radford, telephone 01332 556531, [email protected] If you would like to discuss any matters before the meeting, please do not hesitate to contact me.
    [Show full text]
  • Derbyshire Parish Registers. Marriages
    942.51019 M. L; Aalp v.4 1379092 GENEALOGY COLLECTION ALLEN COUNTY PUBLIC LIBRARY 3 1833 00727 4241 DERBYSHIRE PARISH REGISTERS. flDarriagea, IV. phiiximore's parish register series. vol. xc. (derbyshire, vol. iv.) One hundred and fifty only printed. I0.ip.cj : Derbyshire Parish Registers, flftat triages. Edited by W. P. W. PHILLIMORE, M.A., B.C.L., AND LL. LL. SIMPSON. £,c VOL. IV. ILon&on Issued to the Subscribers by Phillimore & Co., 124, Chancery Lane. 1908. — PREFACE. As promised in the last volume of the Marriage Registers of Derbyshire, the marriage records of St. Alkmund's form the first instalment of the Registers of the County Town. The Editors do not doubt that these will prove especially interesting to Derbyshire people. In Volume V they hope to print further instalments of town registers in the shape of those of St. Michael's and also some village registers. It will be noticed that St. Alkmund's register begins at the earliest possible date, 1538, but of the remainder, two do not start till the seventeenth century and one, that of Quarndon, synchronizes with the passing of Lord Hardwicke's Marriage Act. 1379092 It will be convenient to give here a list of the Derby- shire parishes of which the Registers have been printed in this series: Volume I. Volume II. Dale Abbey Boulton Brailsford Duffield Stanton-by-Dale Hezthalias Lownd Volume III. Stanley or Lund Duffield Spondon Breaston Church Broughton Mellor Kirk Ireton Sandiacre Hault Hucknall Volume IV. Risley Mackworth Derby— St. Alkmund's Ockbrook Allestree Quarndon Tickenhall Foremark It has not been thought needful to print the entries — verbatim.
    [Show full text]
  • Derbyshire. [Kelly's
    130 DERBY. DERBYSHIRE. [KELLY'S Cattle Market, on the Hulmes, Francis Walker, superin- Inland Revenue Office, Vict<lTia street, David Thom, rol- tendent &; collector lector; S. Thorn, surveyor of taxes; James Le~lie &; Chamber of Commerce, 24 Strand, T. H. Harrison, H. Grimes, supervisors; Thomas Groves &; J. L. Hope, president,; L. W. Wilshire, sec principal clerks; 'Villiam Jackson &; S. Gregilry, clerka Corn Exchange, Albert street, Amos "'right, sec Judges' Lodgings,St.Mary's gate,Edmund Wilmot,steward Corn Exchange Theatre, Corn Exchange, Albert street, Little Chester Recreation Groundl, Mansfield road, in Amos Wright, sec. &; manager charge of the cnrator of the Arboretum Corporation Art Gallery,Strand,William Crowther,curator ~farket Hall, Market place, Francis Walker,superintenden~ OuTporation Baths, Public offices, Full street, John ~rasonic Hall, Gower street', Thomas Day, hall keeper Oakley Smith, superintendent ~ridland Railway Institute, Ra.:.lway terrace, GeJrge County Court, office, 10 Full street; hours, 10 to 4; James Pratt, sec.; Ernest Albert Baker B.A. librarian except llaturdaY', when the office closes at I. The court Ordnance Survey for Divisions of Surrey &; Sussex, 18 ill held at the County hall, St. Mary's gate: His Honor Strand, Captain C. E. Norton, in charge William O. Smyly Q.C. judge; Woodforde Bead'on Recreation Grounds, on the llolmes, Cattle market, Wovdforde, registrar &; high bailiff; John Smith, Joseph Longdon, superintendent bankruptcy official ree-eiver. The district comprises Sheriff's Offices, St. :Michael's churchyard, Queen street, the following parishes &; places :-Allentown, Allestree, Barber, Currey ~ Currey, acting under-sheriffs Alvaston, Ambaston, Arleston, Ash, Aston, Barrow, Suuthwell Diocesan Registry, The Place, Queen street, Bearwardcote, Borrowash, Botany Bay, Boultun, Bread- John Boruugh J.P.
    [Show full text]
  • LOCAL AMENITIES Stepping Into the Heritage Collection at Deer Park Is Truly Like HERE for YOU EVERY STEP of COMING the WAY
    LOCAL AMENITIES Stepping into The Heritage Collection at Deer Park is truly like HERE FOR YOU EVERY STEP OF COMING THE WAY... As one of the UK’s leading housebuilders, one of our main aims is to make your move as enjoyable as possible. That’s why we listen carefully and work with you every step of the way. It’s no HOME wonder so many customers choose Redrow time and time again. Meeting your needs Whether you’re reserving your new home or just about to complete, our Sales Consultant will The mix of Heritage Collection homes planned for this development is sure to attract couples and keep you updated and offer help at each stage. They’ll have all the information needed to help families from across the region. By seamlessly combining traditional exteriors with high-specification you make the right choice about the location and type of home that suits you best. interiors finished to a contemporary style, we have succeeded in creating the finest living standards for you and your family. The pride that we feel for our homes is evident in even the smallest detail, and it WelcoMe to your neW hoMe is a pride that we know you will share. As soon as your property is complete, our Sales Consultant will invite you to a demonstration of your new ­­­Redrow home. You will then be shown all the essentials, including operation Deer Park at The Heathfields is situated just outside the picturesque village of Monkton Heathfield, of appliances, central heating and the hot water systems, and you’ll be able to ask any in the stunning Somerset countryside.
    [Show full text]
  • Derbyshire Gritstone Way
    A Walker's Guide By Steve Burton Max Maughan Ian Quarrington TT HHEE DDEE RRBB YYSS HHII RREE GGRRII TTSS TTOONNEE WW AAYY A Walker's Guide By Steve Burton Max Maughan Ian Quarrington (Members of the Derby Group of the Ramblers' Association) The Derbyshire Gritstone Way First published by Thornhill Press, 24 Moorend Road Cheltenham Copyright Derby Group Ramblers, 1980 ISBN 0 904110 88 5 The maps are based upon the relevant Ordnance Survey Maps with the permission of the controller of Her Majesty's Stationery Office, Crown Copyright reserved CONTENTS Foreward.............................................................................................................................. 5 Introduction......................................................................................................................... 6 Derby - Breadsall................................................................................................................. 8 Breadsall - Eaton Park Wood............................................................................................ 13 Eaton Park Wood - Milford............................................................................................... 14 Milford - Belper................................................................................................................ 16 Belper - Ridgeway............................................................................................................. 18 Ridgeway - Whatstandwell..............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 May-June
    GRAND TRUNK Barnton Slippage at Soot Hill See pp. 12/13 May/June 2021 www.trentandmerseycanalsociety.org.uk Chairman’s Bit As you can read on page 14, our canal has finally been reopened at Soot Hill near Anderton. We can personally report that passage both ways was easy, having just been though (and back) on a return cruise to Worsley. There are signs asking you to proceed at tick-over, a buoyed channel, and two CRT staff to explain why you need to be careful. The landslip is quite spectacular! Let us hope that the earth doesn’t move again, or there could be a renewed closure! On our return trip we were delayed deep within Barnton Tunnel. We were about half-way through when another boat came in towards us. Despite much honking (from both boats) we eventually stopped “bow to bow”. Apparently, they hadn’t seen that we were already in the tunnel! They were surprised to find that they couldn’t pass us inside the tunnel, and horrified to realise that they would have to reverse back out (as we were already ¾ of the way through). Ten minutes later (and in the open air) we politely said “Thank you”, they were full of apologies, and we parted without any hard feelings. Cheshire Lock working parties resumed in April, unfortunately without one stalwart (see page 17). It was great to be at work again, enjoying the open air, the sunshine and chatting to fellow workers (at the regulation Covid-19 distance of course!). Sorry that there is no news yet about our Winter Season of talks for 2021-22.
    [Show full text]
  • Southern Stoke ARF
    Southern Stoke ARF RENEW November 2007 (Final Draft) www.gvagrimley.co.uk RENEW Contents CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION.........................................................................................................1 2. ARF IN CONTEXT ....................................................................................................10 3. VISION AND OBJECTIVES .....................................................................................44 4. STRATEGY AND PROPOSALS ..............................................................................52 5. DELIVERING LOCAL BENEFIT ..............................................................................84 6. DELIVERY STRATEGY............................................................................................92 November 2007 RENEW Southern Stoke ARF 1. INTRODUCTION Purpose of ARF 1.1 GVA Grimley LLP, taking the lead role in a wider consortium of consultants including a number of specialisms, have been commission by RENEW North Staffordshire (RENEW) to produce an Area Regeneration Framework (ARF) for the Southern Stoke area. 1.2 The ARF sets out the evidence base behind and strategy for a comprehensive programme of intervention to secure housing market renewal and sustainable neighbourhoods. It sets out a schedule of interventions to be delivered by RENEW and its partners, as part of an appropriate phasing strategy for the area. 1.3 The ARF is a housing market focused strategic spatial framework that sets out a vision for the future regeneration of the Southern Stoke area.
    [Show full text]
  • Boston Borough Strategic Flood Risk Assessment
    Water Boston Borough Council October 2010 Strategic Flood Risk Assessment Water Boston Borough Council October 2010 Prepared by: ................................ Checked by: .............................. Roy Lobley Richard Ramsden Associate Director Senior Engineer Approved by: ........................... Andy Yarde Regional Director Strategic Flood Risk Assessment Rev No Comments Checked by Approved Date by 1 Final to client RR AY April 2011 5th Floor, 2 City Walk, Leeds, LS11 9AR Telephone: 0113 391 6800 Website: http://www.aecom.com Job No 60034187 Reference RE01 Date Created October 2010 This document is confidential and the copyright of AECOM Limited. Any unauthorised reproduction or usage by any person other than the addressee is strictly prohibited. f:\projects\50016i boston sfra (revision)\reports\boston sfra final march11.docx Table of Contents Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................................................................ 1 1 Introduction ....................................................................................................................................................................... 7 2 Development Planning...................................................................................................................................................... 9 East Midlands Regional Spatial Strategy ...........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Walk Westward Now Along This High Ridge and from This Vantage Point, You Can Often Gaze Down Upon Kestrels Who in Turn Are Scouring the Grass for Prey
    This e-book has been laid out so that each walk starts on a left hand-page, to make print- ing the individual walks easier. When viewing on-screen, clicking on a walk below will take you to that walk in the book (pity it can’t take you straight to the start point of the walk itself!) As always, I’d be pleased to hear of any errors in the text or changes to the walks themselves. Happy walking! Walk Page Walks of up to 6 miles 1 East Bristol – Pucklechurch 3 2 North Bristol – The Tortworth Chestnut 5 3 North Bristol – Wetmoor Wood 7 4 West Bristol – Prior’s Wood 9 5 West Bristol – Abbots Leigh 11 6 The Mendips – Charterhouse 13 7 East Bristol – Willsbridge & The Dramway 16 8 Vale of Berkeley – Ham & Stone 19 Walks of 6–8 miles 9 South Bristol – Pensford & Stanton Drew 22 10 Vale of Gloucester – Deerhurst & The Severn Way 25 11 Glamorgan – Castell Coch 28 12 Clevedon – Tickenham Moor 31 13 The Mendips – Ebbor Gorge 33 14 Herefordshire – The Cat’s Back 36 15 The Wye Valley – St. Briavels 38 Walks of 8–10 miles 16 North Somerset – Kewstoke & Woodspring Priory 41 17 Chippenham – Maud Heath’s Causeway 44 18 The Cotswolds – Ozleworth Bottom 47 19 East Mendips – East Somerset Railway 50 20 Forest of Dean – The Essence of the Forest 54 21 The Cotswolds – Chedworth 57 22 The Cotswolds – Westonbirt & The Arboretum 60 23 Bath – The Kennet & Avon Canal 63 24 The Cotswolds – The Thames & Severn Canal 66 25 East Mendips – Mells & Nunney 69 26 Limpley Stoke Valley – Bath to Bradford-on-Avon 73 Middle Hope (walk 16) Walks of over 10 miles 27 Avebury –
    [Show full text]