Infrastructure Planning Planning Act 2008 The Infrastructure Planning (Applications: A38Prescribed Derby Junctions Forms and Procedure) Regulations 2009 TR010022 Volume 6 6.1A38 DerbyEnvironmental Junctions Statement Development Consent Order 202[ ] Chapter 6 – Cultural Heritage 6.1 Environmental Statement Chapter 1 Introduction Regulation 5(2)(a) Planning Act 2008 Regulation Number Regulation 5(2)(a) Planning Inspectorate SchemeInfrastructureTR010022 Planning (Applications: Prescribed Reference Forms and Procedure) Regulations 2009 Application Document Reference 6.1 Author A38 Derby Junctions AECOM Project Team and Highways England April 2019 Version Date Status of Version 1 April 2019 DCO Application ERROR! NO DOCUMENT VARIABLE SUPPLIED. A38 Derby Junctions Environmental Statement Infrastructure Planning Planning Act 2008 The Infrastructure Planning (Applications: Prescribed Forms and Procedure) Regulations 2009 A38 Derby Junctions Development Consent Order 202[ ] 6.1 Environmental Statement Chapter 6 Cultural Heritage Regulation Number Regulation 5(2)(a) Planning Inspectorate Scheme TR010022 Reference Application Document Reference 6.1 Author A38 Derby Junctions Project Team, Highways England Version Date Status of Version 1 April 2019 DCO Application Planning Inspectorate Scheme Ref: TR010022 Application Document Ref: TR010022/APP/6.1 A38 Derby Junctions Environmental Statement Table of Contents Chapter Page 6. Cultural Heritage ................................................................................................. 1 6.1. Introduction and competent expert evidence ........................................................ 1 6.2. Legislative and policy framework .......................................................................... 1 6.3. Assessment methodology ..................................................................................... 5 6.4. Consultation ........................................................................................................ 14 6.5. Assessment assumptions and limitations ............................................................ 16 6.6. Study area ........................................................................................................... 20 6.7. Previous investigations close to the Scheme ...................................................... 20 6.8. Historic map regression ...................................................................................... 23 6.9. Cultural heritage baseline ................................................................................... 27 6.10. Historic buildings ................................................................................................. 38 6.11. Historic landscape ............................................................................................... 53 6.12. Future baseline ................................................................................................... 61 6.13. Potential impacts ................................................................................................. 62 6.14. Design, mitigation and enhancement measures ................................................. 63 6.15. Assessment of likely significant effects ............................................................... 70 6.16. Monitoring ........................................................................................................... 78 6.17. Summary of assessment ..................................................................................... 78 6.18. References .......................................................................................................... 88 List of Tables Table 6.1: Relevant NPSNN policies for the cultural heritage assessment .......................... 2 Table 6.2: Criteria to determine the value of heritage assets ............................................... 8 Table 6.3: Factors in the assessment of magnitude of impact: archaeological remains ...... 9 Table 6.4: Factors in the assessment of magnitude of impact: historic buildings ............... 10 Table 6.5: Factors in the assessment of magnitude of impact: historic landscape ............ 10 Table 6.6: Significance of effect matrix .............................................................................. 11 Table 6.7: Scoping opinion and response .......................................................................... 13 Table 6.8: Consultee comments ........................................................................................ 15 Table 6.9: Consultee comments on the PEIR .................................................................... 17 Table 6.10: Archaeological mitigation measures ............................................................... 68 Table 6.11: Cultural heritage - summary of effects (refer to Figures 6.1 to 6.6 and Figures 6.8 to 6.9 [TR010022/APP/6.2]) ........................................................................................ 80 Planning Inspectorate Scheme Ref: TR010022 Application Document Ref: TR010022/APP/6.1 A38 Derby Junctions Environmental Statement List of Figures [TR010022/APP/6.2] Figure 6.1: Kingsway Junction – Location of Designated and Non-designated Heritage Assets Figure 6.2: Markeaton Junction – Location of Designated and Non-designated Heritage Assets Figure 6.3: Friar Gate Conservation Areas – Location of Designated and Non-designated Heritage Assets Figure 6.4: Kedleston Hall Park and Garden – Location of Designated and Non-designated Heritage Assets Figure 6.5: Little Eaton Junction – Location of Designated and Non-designated Heritage Assets Figure 6.6: Little Eaton Junction – Location of Designated and Non-designated Heritage Assets Figure 6.7: Little Eaton Junction – LIDAR Data Figure 6.8: Kingsway and Markeaton – Historic Landscape Character Areas Figure 6.9: Little Eaton Junction – Historic Landscape Character Areas List of Appendices [TR010022/APP/6.3] Appendix 6.1: Heritage Impact Assessment (HIA) for Derwent Valley Mills World Heritage Site Appendix 6.2: Gazetteer of cultural heritage assets Appendix 6.3: Plates Planning Inspectorate Scheme Ref: TR010022 Application Document Ref: TR010022/APP/6.1 A38 Derby Junctions Environmental Statement 6. Cultural Heritage 6.1. Introduction and competent expert evidence 6.1.1. This chapter assesses the potential cultural heritage impacts associated with the construction and operation of the Scheme, following the methodology set out in Design Manual for Roads and Bridges (DMRB) Volume 11, Section 3, Part 2 (HA 208/07) (Highways Agency, 2007a). This chapter summarises the regulatory and policy framework related to cultural heritage, details the methodology followed for the assessment and describes the existing environment in the area surrounding the Scheme. Following this, the design and mitigation measures proposed to manage and minimise potential impacts are specified, after which residual cultural heritage effects of the Scheme are presented. Assumptions and limitations made during the assessment are provided in Section 6.5. 6.1.2. A key focus of this cultural heritage impact assessment concerns the Scheme impacts upon the Derwent Valley Mills World Heritage Site (WHS) which is located to the west of the existing Little Eaton junction, with some parts of the Scheme being located within the WHS boundary. Thus, in addition to presenting the findings of the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) in respect of cultural heritage, this chapter also incorporates a Heritage Impact Assessment (HIA) which specifically addresses the impacts of the Scheme upon the Outstanding Universal Value (OUV) of the Derwent Valley Mills WHS (refer to Appendix 6.1 [TR010022/APP/6.3]). 6.1.3. This chapter is also supported by a gazetteer of cultural heritage assets provided in Appendix 6.2 [TR010022/APP/6.3], whilst Appendix 6.3 [TR010022/APP/6.3] provides a range of maps, plans, photos of relevance to the assessment. 6.1.4. All figures cited within this chapter are included within Environmental Statement (ES) Volume 2 [TR010022/APP/6.2]. 6.1.5. This chapter of the ES has been prepared by competent experts with relevant and appropriate experience. The technical lead for the cultural heritage assessment has 25 years of relevant experience and has professional qualifications as summarised in Appendix 1.1 [TR010022/APP/6.3]. 6.2. Legislative and policy framework 6.2.1. As discussed in Chapter 1: Introduction, the primary basis for deciding whether or not to grant a Development Consent Order (DCO) is the National Policy Statement for National Networks (NPSNN) (Department for Transport (DfT), 2014). NPSNN Sections 4 and 5 set out policies to guide how DCO applications will be decided and how the impacts of national networks infrastructure should be considered. Table 6.1 identifies the NPSNN policies relevant to the cultural heritage assessment and where in this ES chapter information is provided to address these policy requirements. Planning Inspectorate Scheme Ref: TR010022 Application Document Ref: TR010022/APP/6.1 1 A38 Derby Junctions Environmental Statement Table 6.1: Relevant NPSNN policies for the cultural heritage assessment Relevant Requirement of the NPSNN Location where NPSNN para. information addresses Ref. policy requirements 5.124 Non-designated assets of archaeological Non-designated assets interest that are demonstrably of equivalent are considered in this significance to scheduled monuments should assessment. See para. be considered subject to the policies for 6.3.12, Table 6.2