DOCSLIB.ORG

Strategy on Control and Management of the Worst Invasive Alien Plant Species Reported in India

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Strategy on Control and Management of the Worst Invasive Alien Plant Species Reported in India Strategy on Control and Management of the Worst Invasive Alien Plant Species Reported in India S. Sandilyan Authors S. Sandilyan Citation Sandilyan, S. 2019. Strategies for control and management of some selective Invasive Alien Plant Species Endangering Indian Biodiversity. National Biodiversity Authority, Chennai. Copyright © National Biodiversity Authority 2018 ISBN : 978-81-940589-8-4 Published by Centre for Biodiversity Policy and Law (CEBPOL) National Biodiversity Authority 5th Floor, TICEL Biopark, CSIR Road, Taramani Chennai – 600 113, Tamil Nadu, India Website: http://nbaindia.org/cebpol/ Layout and Design N. Singaram IT Executive, CEBPOL Disclaimer: This publications is prepared as an initiative under CEBPOL programme. All the views expressed in this publication are based on established legal principles. Any error or lapse is purely unintended and inconsequential and shall not make either the NBA or the CEBPOL liable for the same. Some pictures and images included in this publication are sourced from public domain. This publications is purely for non- commercial purposes including awareness creation and capacity building. Acknowledgements The success and final outcome of this document required a lot of guidance and assistance from many people and I am extremely privileged to thank them all. I personally thank Dr. B. Meenakumari, Chairperson, National Biodiversity Authority (NBA), and Shri T. Rabi Kumar, Secretary, NBA for their constant support, guidance and encouragement, which made me to bring out the document duly. I would also like to thank Dr. C.R. Babu, Director of the Centre for EnvironmentalManagement of Degraded Ecosystems (CEMDE), University of Delhi, Dr, K.V.Sankaran former director, KFRI, Dr. R.M. Kathiresan, Professor, Department of Agronomy, Annamalai University, Anjana Dewanji and Achyut Kumar Banerjee, Agricultural and Ecological Research Unit, Indian Statistical Institute, Kolkata, Dr.M.N.V. Prasad,University of Hyderabad, Telangana and Dr. Steve Adkins, School of Agriculture and Food Science, The University of Queensland, Australia, provided me lot of literatures and encouragement. I am also thankful to Dr. Rupam Mandal, Program Manager and colleagues at the Centre for Biodiversity Policy and Law (CEBPOL) for their comments. Special thanks to Mr. N. Singaram, IT Executive, CEBPOL, NBA, Chennai, for his kind cooperation and encouragement and also for helping in designing the cover photo and layout. S. Sandilyan Contents I. Strategy to control the worst invasive alien plant species reported in India ........................... 1 1. Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 1 2. Strategies for the management of invasive alien plant species found in ............................ 1 different ecosystems II. Management and control of Prosopis juliflora ........................................................................ 10 1. Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 10 2. Biology of P. juliflora ............................................................................................................ 11 3. Impacts of P. juliflora ........................................................................................................... 13 4. Management ....................................................................................................................... 14 a. Mechanical Control Methods ........................................................................................ 15 b. Biological Control .......................................................................................................... 15 c. Chemical Control ........................................................................................................... 16 d. Control by Utilization ..................................................................................................... 16 e. Legislation ...................................................................................................................... 18 f. Recommendation .......................................................................................................... 19 References ........................................................................................................................ 19 III. Management and control of Parthenium hysterophorus ........................................................ 22 1. Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 22 2. Biology of Parthenium hysterophorus ................................................................................. 23 3. Impacts of Parthenium hysterophorus ................................................................................ 25 4. Management ....................................................................................................................... 26 a. Mechanical Control ....................................................................................................... 26 b. Chemical Control ........................................................................................................... 27 c. Control by Utilization ..................................................................................................... 28 d. Biological Control ........................................................................................................... 28 d1. Competitive Replacement ..................................................................................... 28 d2. Bio herbicidal Approach ........................................................................................ 29 d3. Biological Control through Insects ......................................................................... 29 e. Legislation ...................................................................................................................... 31 f. Recommendation .......................................................................................................... 32 References ........................................................................................................................ 32 IV. Management and control of Mikania micrantha .................................................................... 35 1. Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 35 2. Biology of Milania micrantha .............................................................................................. 37 3. Impacts of Milania micrantha ............................................................................................. 38 4. Management ....................................................................................................................... 39 a. Mechanical Control ....................................................................................................... 39 b. Chemical Control ........................................................................................................... 40 c. Control by Utilization ..................................................................................................... 41 d. Biological Control .......................................................................................................... 41 e. Integrated Management with Biological Control ......................................................... 41 f. Legislation ...................................................................................................................... 42 References ........................................................................................................................ 42 V. Management and control of Lantana camara ........................................................................ 44 1. Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 44 2. Biology of Lantana camara .................................................................................................. 45 3. Impacts of Lantana camara ................................................................................................. 46 4. Management ....................................................................................................................... 47 a. Chemical Control ........................................................................................................... 47 b. Biological Control .......................................................................................................... 47 c. Control by Utilization ..................................................................................................... 48 d. Control through Legislation ........................................................................................... 48 e. Mechanical Control ........................................................................................................ 49 References ........................................................................................................................ 50 VI. Management strategies for Eichhornia crassipes .................................................................... 52 1. Introduction ........................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Thousand Cankers Disease Survey Guidelines for 2016
    Thousand Cankers Disease Survey Guidelines for 2016 United States Department of Agriculture: Forest Service (FS) and Plant Protection and Quarantine (PPQ) April 2016 Photo Credits: Lee Pederson (Forest Health Protection, Coeur d Alene, ID), Stacy Hishinuma, UC Davis Table of Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................................... 1 Background ................................................................................................................................................... 1 Symptoms ..................................................................................................................................................... 3 Survey ........................................................................................................................................................... 3 Roles ......................................................................................................................................................... 4 Data Collection ......................................................................................................................................... 4 Methods .................................................................................................................................................... 4 Sample Collection and Handling .............................................................................................................. 5 Supplies
    [Show full text]
  • Checklist of the Leaf-Mining Flies (Diptera, Agromyzidae) of Finland
    A peer-reviewed open-access journal ZooKeys 441: 291–303Checklist (2014) of the leaf-mining flies( Diptera, Agromyzidae) of Finland 291 doi: 10.3897/zookeys.441.7586 CHECKLIST www.zookeys.org Launched to accelerate biodiversity research Checklist of the leaf-mining flies (Diptera, Agromyzidae) of Finland Jere Kahanpää1 1 Finnish Museum of Natural History, Zoology Unit, P.O. Box 17, FI–00014 University of Helsinki, Finland Corresponding author: Jere Kahanpää ([email protected]) Academic editor: J. Salmela | Received 25 March 2014 | Accepted 28 April 2014 | Published 19 September 2014 http://zoobank.org/04E1C552-F83F-4611-8166-F6B1A4C98E0E Citation: Kahanpää J (2014) Checklist of the leaf-mining flies (Diptera, Agromyzidae) of Finland. In: Kahanpää J, Salmela J (Eds) Checklist of the Diptera of Finland. ZooKeys 441: 291–303. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.441.7586 Abstract A checklist of the Agromyzidae (Diptera) recorded from Finland is presented. 279 (or 280) species are currently known from the country. Phytomyza linguae Lundqvist, 1947 is recorded as new to Finland. Keywords Checklist, Finland, Diptera, biodiversity, faunistics Introduction The Agromyzidae are called the leaf-miner or leaf-mining flies and not without reason, although a substantial fraction of the species feed as larvae on other parts of living plants. While Agromyzidae is traditionally placed in the superfamily Opomyzoidea, its exact relationships with other acalyptrate Diptera are poorly understood (see for example Winkler et al. 2010). Two subfamilies are recognised within the leaf-mining flies: Agromyzinae and Phytomyzinae. Both are now recognised as natural groups (Dempewolf 2005, Scheffer et al. 2007). Unfortunately the genera are not as well defined: at least Ophiomyia, Phy- toliriomyza and Aulagromyza are paraphyletic in DNA sequence analyses (see Scheffer et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Bark Beetles and Pinhole Borers Recently Or Newly Introduced to France (Coleoptera: Curculionidae, Scolytinae and Platypodinae)
    Zootaxa 4877 (1): 051–074 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) https://www.mapress.com/j/zt/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2020 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4877.1.2 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:3CABEE0D-D1D2-4150-983C-8F8FE2438953 Bark beetles and pinhole borers recently or newly introduced to France (Coleoptera: Curculionidae, Scolytinae and Platypodinae) THOMAS BARNOUIN1*, FABIEN SOLDATI1,7, ALAIN ROQUES2, MASSIMO FACCOLI3, LAWRENCE R. KIRKENDALL4, RAPHAËLLE MOUTTET5, JEAN-BAPTISTE DAUBREE6 & THIERRY NOBLECOURT1,8 1Office national des forêts, Laboratoire national d’entomologie forestière, 2 rue Charles Péguy, 11500 Quillan, France. 7 https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9697-3787 8 https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9248-9012 2URZF- Zoologie Forestière, INRAE, 2163 Avenue de la Pomme de Pin, 45075, Orléans, France. �[email protected]; https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3734-3918 3Department of Agronomy, Food, Natural Resources, Animals and Environment (DAFNAE), University of Padua, Viale dell’Università, 16, 35020 Legnaro, Italy. �[email protected]; https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9355-0516 4Department of Biology, University of Bergen, P.O. Box 7803, N-5006 Bergen, Norway. �[email protected]; https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7335-6441 5ANSES, Laboratoire de la Santé des Végétaux, 755 avenue du Campus Agropolis, CS 30016, 34988 Montferrier-sur-Lez cedex, France. �[email protected]; https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4676-3364 6Pôle Sud-Est de la Santé des Forêts, DRAAF SRAL PACA, BP 95, 84141 Montfavet cedex, France. �[email protected]; https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5383-3984 *Corresponding author: �[email protected]; https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1194-3667 Abstract We present an annotated list of 11 Scolytinae and Platypodinae species newly or recently introduced to France.
    [Show full text]
  • Terrestrial Arthropod Surveys on Pagan Island, Northern Marianas
    Terrestrial Arthropod Surveys on Pagan Island, Northern Marianas Neal L. Evenhuis, Lucius G. Eldredge, Keith T. Arakaki, Darcy Oishi, Janis N. Garcia & William P. Haines Pacific Biological Survey, Bishop Museum, Honolulu, Hawaii 96817 Final Report November 2010 Prepared for: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Pacific Islands Fish & Wildlife Office Honolulu, Hawaii Evenhuis et al. — Pagan Island Arthropod Survey 2 BISHOP MUSEUM The State Museum of Natural and Cultural History 1525 Bernice Street Honolulu, Hawai’i 96817–2704, USA Copyright© 2010 Bishop Museum All Rights Reserved Printed in the United States of America Contribution No. 2010-015 to the Pacific Biological Survey Evenhuis et al. — Pagan Island Arthropod Survey 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary ......................................................................................................... 5 Background ..................................................................................................................... 7 General History .............................................................................................................. 10 Previous Expeditions to Pagan Surveying Terrestrial Arthropods ................................ 12 Current Survey and List of Collecting Sites .................................................................. 18 Sampling Methods ......................................................................................................... 25 Survey Results ..............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Dube Nontembeko 2019.Pdf (2.959Mb)
    UNDERSTANDING THE FITNESS, PREFERENCE AND PERFORMANCE OF SPECIALIST HERBIVORES OF THE SOUTHERN AFRICAN BIOTYPE OF CHROMOLAENA ODORATA (ASTERACEAE), AND IMPACTS ON PHYTOCHEMISTRY AND GROWTH RATE OF THE PLANT By NONTEMBEKO DUBE Submitted in fulfillment of the academic requirement of Doctorate of Philosophy In The Discipline of Entomology School of Life Sciences College of Agriculture, Engineering and Science University of KwaZulu-Natal Pietermaritzburg South Africa 2019 PREFACE The research contained in this thesis was completed by the candidate while based in the Discipline of Entomology, School of Life Sciences of the College of Agriculture, Engineering and Science, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Pietermaritzburg campus, South Africa, under the supervision of Dr Caswell Munyai, Dr Costas Zachariades, Dr Osariyekemwen Uyi and the guidance of Prof Fanie van Heerden. The research was financially supported by the Natural Resource Management Programmes of the Department of Environmental Affairs, and Plant Health and Protection of the Agricultural Research Council. The contents of this work have not been submitted in any form to another university and, except where the work of others is acknowledged in the text, the results reported are due to investigations by the candidate. _________________________ Signed: N. Dube (Candidate) Date: 08 August 2019 __________________________ Signed: C. Munyai (Supervisor) Date: 08August 8, 2019 ________________________________ Signed: C. Zachariades (Co-supervisor) Date: 08 August 2019 _________________________________
    [Show full text]
  • Surveying for Terrestrial Arthropods (Insects and Relatives) Occurring Within the Kahului Airport Environs, Maui, Hawai‘I: Synthesis Report
    Surveying for Terrestrial Arthropods (Insects and Relatives) Occurring within the Kahului Airport Environs, Maui, Hawai‘i: Synthesis Report Prepared by Francis G. Howarth, David J. Preston, and Richard Pyle Honolulu, Hawaii January 2012 Surveying for Terrestrial Arthropods (Insects and Relatives) Occurring within the Kahului Airport Environs, Maui, Hawai‘i: Synthesis Report Francis G. Howarth, David J. Preston, and Richard Pyle Hawaii Biological Survey Bishop Museum Honolulu, Hawai‘i 96817 USA Prepared for EKNA Services Inc. 615 Pi‘ikoi Street, Suite 300 Honolulu, Hawai‘i 96814 and State of Hawaii, Department of Transportation, Airports Division Bishop Museum Technical Report 58 Honolulu, Hawaii January 2012 Bishop Museum Press 1525 Bernice Street Honolulu, Hawai‘i Copyright 2012 Bishop Museum All Rights Reserved Printed in the United States of America ISSN 1085-455X Contribution No. 2012 001 to the Hawaii Biological Survey COVER Adult male Hawaiian long-horned wood-borer, Plagithmysus kahului, on its host plant Chenopodium oahuense. This species is endemic to lowland Maui and was discovered during the arthropod surveys. Photograph by Forest and Kim Starr, Makawao, Maui. Used with permission. Hawaii Biological Report on Monitoring Arthropods within Kahului Airport Environs, Synthesis TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents …………….......................................................……………...........……………..…..….i. Executive Summary …….....................................................…………………...........……………..…..….1 Introduction ..................................................................………………………...........……………..…..….4
    [Show full text]
  • A Bark Beetle Hypothenemus Erudituswestwood
    EENY-664 A Bark Beetle Hypothenemus eruditus Westwood (1836) (Insecta: Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae)1 Yin-Tse Huang, Jiri Hulcr, Andrew J. Johnson, and Andrea Lucky2 Introduction been recovered from many unexpected locations, e.g. gal- leries of other beetles (Deyrup 1987), fungal fruiting bodies Hypothenemus eruditus species and from all subtropical (Browne 1961), manufactured objects such as drawing and tropical regions (Wood 1982). This species is the type boards (Browne 1961), and book bindings, from which the species of the bark beetle genus Hypothenemus (Coleoptera: name (eruditus, i.e. erudite) was derived (Westwood 1836). Curculionidae: Scolytinae), which belongs to the tribe Cryphalini, the pygmy borers. With over 180 described spe- cies, Hypothenemus is one of the most species-rich genera Taxonomy among bark beetles. In addition, it appears to be the most The genus Hypothenemus was established based on the type common scolytine in the world (Wood 2007). In Florida, species, Hypothenemus eruditus Westwood (Westwood Hypothenemus are probably the most common bark beetles 1836), and the genus name was given in reference to the (Johnson et al. 2016). They are ubiquitous in forests and by downward facing mouthparts (“Hypo” means under, far the most common bark beetles in urban and suburban “thenemus” is an unusual variant of a Greek word for areas, but they are virtually unknown to the public due “mouth”, Westwood 1836). The taxonomic status of to their minute size (only up to 1.3 mm). Hypothenemus Hypothenemus eruditus is extraordinarily complicated, as it eruditus is the most common cryphaline species in Florida. includes over 70 taxonomic synonyms.
    [Show full text]
  • Annotated List of Agromyzidae (Diptera) from Iran, with Four New Records
    J. Entomol. Res. Soc., 12(3): 1-6, 2010 ISBN:1302-0250 Annotated List of Agromyzidae (Diptera) from Iran, with Four New Records Abu Fazel DOUSTI Department of Entomology, Islamic Azad University, Jahrom Branch, Fars, IRAN e-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT The Agromyzidae family includes the most important dipterous species miners of crops for agriculture. Knowledge of 2900 worldwide species are cited, of which about 7% are considered of agronomic interest. (Ortiza, 2009). All Agromyzidae species undermine the internal tissue of different organs of plants. Depending on their eating habits they can be classified as leaf miners (leafmining), stem miners (stem-mining and tunneling), cambium miners, and parasites of flower buds or fruits. Agromyzidae genus within the Palaearctic region consists of 24 genera constituting a total of 1165 species. The first annotated list of Iranian leafminers of the family Agromyzidae (Diptera), comprising 26 species, is presented. Two Genera and four species, are considered to be new records from Iran: Amauromyza carlinae (Herring, 1944), Amauromyza fraxini (Beiger, 1980), Calycomyza humeralis (von Roser, 1840), Pseudonapomyza atra (Meigen, 1830). Key words: Annotated list, Agromyzidae, leafminers, new record, Iran INTRODUCTION Agromyzidae (leafmining flies) is one of the largest fly families, with more than 2900 species belonging to 30 genera worldwide. From this family about 1165 species have been identified in the Palaearctic region (Civelek, 2003; Çikman & Sasakawa, 2008). Based mostly on various faunistical survey reports, a taxonomical checklist of 26 nominal species of the Iranian Agromyzidae belonging to two subfamilies, and 11 genera was provided. Therefore, I did not intend to confirm identifications by the previous workers except very obvious cases.
    [Show full text]
  • Halona2021r.Pdf
    Terrestrial Arthropod Survey of Hālona Valley, Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam, Naval Magazine Lualualei Annex, August 2020–November 2020 Neal L. Evenhuis, Keith T. Arakaki, Clyde T. Imada Hawaii Biological Survey Bernice Pauahi Bishop Museum Honolulu, Hawai‘i 96817, USA Final Report prepared for the U.S. Navy Contribution No. 2021-003 to the Hawaii Biological Survey EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Bishop Museum was contracted by the U.S. Navy to conduct surveys of terrestrial arthropods in Hālona Valley, Naval Magazine Lualualei Annex, in order to assess the status of populations of three groups of insects, including species at risk in those groups: picture-winged Drosophila (Diptera; flies), Hylaeus spp. (Hymenoptera; bees), and Rhyncogonus welchii (Coleoptera; weevils). The first complete survey of Lualualei for terrestrial arthropods was made by Bishop Museum in 1997. Since then, the Bishop Museum has conducted surveys in Hālona Valley in 2015, 2016–2017, 2017, 2018, 2019, and 2020. The current survey was conducted from August 2020 through November 2020, comprising a total of 12 trips; using yellow water pan traps, pitfall traps, hand collecting, aerial net collecting, observations, vegetation beating, and a Malaise trap. The area chosen for study was a Sapindus oahuensis grove on a southeastern slope of mid-Hālona Valley. The area had potential for all three groups of arthropods to be present, especially the Rhyncogonus weevil, which has previously been found in association with Sapindus trees. Trapped and collected insects were taken back to the Bishop Museum for sorting, identification, data entry, and storage and preservation. The results of the surveys proved negative for any of the target groups.
    [Show full text]
  • Diptera: Agromyzidae) Inferred from Sequence Data from Multiple Genes
    Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 42 (2007) 756–775 www.elsevier.com/locate/ympev Phylogenetic relationships within the leaf-mining Xies (Diptera: Agromyzidae) inferred from sequence data from multiple genes Sonja J. ScheVer a,¤, Isaac S. Winkler b, Brian M. Wiegmann c a Systematic Entomology Laboratory, USDA, Agricultural Research Service, Beltsville, MD 20705, USA b Department of Entomology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20740, USA c Department of Entomology, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA Received 9 January 2006; revised 29 November 2006; accepted 18 December 2006 Available online 31 December 2006 Abstract The leaf-mining Xies (Diptera: Agromyzidae) are a diverse group whose larvae feed internally in leaves, stems, Xowers, seeds, and roots of a wide variety of plant hosts. The systematics of agromyzids has remained poorly known due to their small size and morphological homogeneity. We investigated the phylogenetic relationships among genera within the Agromyzidae using parsimony and Bayesian anal- yses of 2965 bp of DNA sequence data from the mitochondrial COI gene, the nuclear ribosomal 28S gene, and the single copy nuclear CAD gene. We included 86 species in 21 genera, including all but a few small genera, and spanning the diversity within the family. The results from parsimony and Bayesian analyses were largely similar, with major groupings of genera in common. SpeciWcally, both analy- ses recovered a monophyletic Phytomyzinae and a monophyletic Agromyzinae. Within the subfamilies, genera found to be monophyletic given our sampling include Agromyza, Amauromyza, Calycomyza, Cerodontha, Liriomyza, Melanagromyza, Metopomyza, Nemorimyza, Phytobia, and Pseudonapomyza. Several genera were found to be polyphyletic or paraphyletic including Aulagromyza, Chromatomyia, Phytoliriomyza, Phytomyza, and Ophiomyia.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Ecological Compensation Areas in Conservation Biological Control
    The role of ecological compensation areas in conservation biological control ______________________________ Promotor: Prof.dr. J.C. van Lenteren Hoogleraar in de Entomologie Promotiecommissie: Prof.dr.ir. A.H.C. van Bruggen Wageningen Universiteit Prof.dr. G.R. de Snoo Wageningen Universiteit Prof.dr. H.J.P. Eijsackers Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam Prof.dr. N. Isidoro Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italië Dit onderzoek is uitgevoerd binnen de onderzoekschool Production Ecology and Resource Conservation Giovanni Burgio The role of ecological compensation areas in conservation biological control ______________________________ Proefschrift ter verkrijging van de graad van doctor op gezag van de rector magnificus van Wageningen Universiteit, Prof. dr. M.J. Kropff, in het openbaar te verdedigen op maandag 3 september 2007 des namiddags te 13.30 in de Aula Burgio, Giovanni (2007) The role of ecological compensation areas in conservation biological control ISBN: 978-90-8504-698-1 to Giorgio Multaque tum interiisse animantum saecla necessest nec potuisse propagando procudere prolem. nam quaecumque vides vesci vitalibus auris aut dolus aut virtus aut denique mobilitas est ex ineunte aevo genus id tutata reservans. multaque sunt, nobis ex utilitate sua quae commendata manent, tutelae tradita nostrae. principio genus acre leonum saevaque saecla tutatast virus, vulpis dolus et gfuga cervos. at levisomma canum fido cum pectore corda et genus omne quod est veterino semine partum lanigeraeque simul pecudes et bucera saecla omnia sunt hominum tutelae tradita, Memmi. nam cupide fugere feras pacemque secuta sunt et larga suo sine pabula parta labore, quae damus utilitatiseorum praemia causa. at quis nil horum tribuit natura, nec ipsa sponte sua possent ut vivere nec dare nobis praesidio nostro pasci genus esseque tatum, scilicet haec aliis praedae lucroque iacebant indupedita suis fatalibus omnia vinclis, donec ad interutum genus id natura redegit.
    [Show full text]
  • Factors Affecting on Infestation of Apple Trees with Pinhole Beetle, Hypothenemus Eruditus (Scolytinae: Curculionidae: Coleoptera) at Menoufia Governorate, Egypt
    Egypt. J. Plant Prot. Res. Inst. (2019), 2 (1): 103-112 Egyptian Journal of Plant Protection Research Institute www.ejppri.eg.net Factors affecting on infestation of apple trees with pinhole beetle, Hypothenemus eruditus (Scolytinae: Curculionidae: Coleoptera) at Menoufia Governorate, Egypt Batt, M.A. Wood Borers and Termites Research Department, Plant Protection Research Institute, Agricultural Research Centre, Dokki, Giza, Egypt. ARTICLE INFO Abstract: Hypothenemus eruditus Westwood (Scolytinae: Article History Curculionidae: Coleoptera) is considered the most Received: 14 / 1 / 2019 widespread and abundant scolytine in the world. The aim of Accepted: 10 / 3 /2019 this is to study the effect of the factors, moisture content of ________________ apple branches, different heights from ground surface and Keywords dominant weather factors on infestation of apple trees with H. Hypothenemus eruditus, eruditus. The results indicated, these factors obviously Coleoptera, Curculioni- detected the following: dae, Scolytinae and apple 1) The highest infestation was recorded for branches with trees. 26.9% moisture content for cutting branches to 7days ago. 2) The highest number of entrance holes recorded for branches at height 150- 200cm. 3) Population fluctuation of H. eruditus beetle during activity periods revealed that the beetles are abundant all year. The number of attracted beetles to intact apple branches, estimated by number of entrance holes, appeared six and five peaks of population density during two successive years of study (2017 and 2018). 4) Seasonal activity of attracted beetles detected that the highest percentages of entrance holes were recorded during the summer followed by the spring or autumn then the winter. The highest monthly percentage of entranced beetles recorded 15.63% during July (2017) and 14.67% during August (2018), while the lowest percentage showed at January of both two seasons.
    [Show full text]