DOCSLIB.ORG

History of the Ri Site and Buildings

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
History of the Ri Site and Buildings Guides to the Royal Institution of Great Britain: 2 The Site and the Buildings Modern Plans of the ground and first floors. Front Cover: A print of the Tempio di Antonino from an etching by Giovanni Battista Piranesi which appeared in his collection entitled ‘Prisons and Views of Rome’. This was presented to the Royal Institution in 1910 by W.G.Flockhart, Architect to the Institution (c.1888-1912), with the comment that this building had been Vulliamy’s model for the façade of 21 Albemarle Street. The building, in the Piazza di Petra, is by H.J.V. Tyrrell also known as The Hadrianeum and was once used as a Custom House. he Royal Institution was founded at a meeting of a group of Hounslow Heath in April 1798. Rumford and Bernard were Tinfluential men held on 7 March 1799 at the Soho Square house favourably impressed by its possibilities and the Managers then of the President of the Royal Society, Joseph Banks (1743-1820). asked the architects Henry Holland (c1746-1806) and John Soane They resolved to ‘form by subscription in the Metropolis of the (1753-1837) to examine its condition. British Empire a Public Institution’ to further ‘the application of science to the common purposes of life’. The proposals for this They reported favourably on the condition of the building and institution had been drawn together in the previous weeks by suggested a price for which it might reasonably be obtained. The Benjamin Thompson, Count Rumford (1753-1814). The meeting Managers agreed to proceed on the basis of that report and, after approved these proposals and elected a committee of Managers to some negotiation, a price of £4850 was agreed for the house, and for run the new Institution. associated leasehold interests. These were (and are) substantial and have had important influences on the later history of the Institution. Also at that meeting Rumford and Thomas Bernard (1750-1818), a Although the first meeting of the Managers was held in No. 21 as wealthy barrister and philanthropist, were commissioned to search early as 5 June 1799, final negotiations were still proceeding since for a suitable home for the infant Institution. That needed to be in a the deed of conveyance is dated 29 August 1799 and the eventual convenient location and sufficiently commodious to act as a meeting terms were not agreed until mid-September. The house was unusual place for subscribers and where lectures and demonstrations could in form in that it was only one room deep with a site frontage, be held. During the eighteenth century a district lying between including a small garden at the north end, of over one hundred and Piccadilly and Oxford Street had been developed as a fashionable forty feet to Albemarle Street. These features made it quite unlike its residential district with a number of large houses, and the search immediate neighbours, Nos. 20 and 22, and they reflect its early began (and ended) there. history as an extension to No. 20. A property in New Bond Street, originally built for Charles Fitzroy, No. 20 had been built between 1703 and 1705 on a freehold plot at 2nd Duke of Grafton (1683-1757), had become available following the the corner of what was, at that time, the extreme northern end of death of a later occupant, John Hobart, 2nd Earl of Buckinghamshire Albemarle Street laid out at the end of the seventeenth century, (1723-1793). It was the first to be inspected by Rumford and Bernard along with Dover, Stafford and Bond Streets, by a development who reported favourably on its location and suitability. However, the syndicate on a block of freehold land immediately north of Piccadilly. Managers felt that the available funds were insufficient to meet the That land had been the site of a great house, known first as proposed annual rental of 400 guineas. A nearby house, 21 Albemarle Clarendon House and later as Albemarle House, commissioned in Street, was then considered. It was owned by a Trust set up under 1664 by Edward Hyde, Earl of Clarendon (1609-1674), then the Lord the Will of William Mellish (c.1710-1791), once MP for Grimsby and Chancellor. He had also obtained from the City of London a 99 year later a Commissioner of Excise, and was on the market following the lease from 1668 on a substantial block of land (the Conduit Mead death of John Mellish, one of William’s sons. He had lived there estate) immediately to the north of his freehold, intended to provide since his father died and had been killed by a highwayman on a park worthy of his mansion. The boundary between his freehold 2 3 and leasehold holdings was a medieval field boundary between across Albemarle Street. Fortunately for Grantham and other Conduit Mead and a field called Penniless Bench upon which his freeholders in the vicinity, four acres forming part of the old house had been built. Figure 1 shows that boundary superimposed Clarendon lease which lay west of Bond Street, immediately north of upon the modern street pattern. and adjacent to their properties, came up for sale in 1707. A group formed from Grantham and his neighbours bought it and then Sadly for Clarendon, he lost favour with Charles II (1630-1685), was divided it among themselves. In 1709 the group obtained a writ dismissed from office, fled to France at the end of 1667 to avoid permitting the road built by the developers to be moved northward, imprisonment and first by about 90 feet and then, with a second writ in 1723, up to the never returned. present line of Grafton Street with the consequent extension of After his death his Albemarle Street to the north. Therefore, No. 20 ceased to be a son Henry Hyde, corner house after 1709 and Grantham, with his own share of the the 2nd Earl (1638- leasehold land, was able to build the extension shown in Rocque’s 1709), sold the 1746 map of London with a frontage of 76 feet along the extended house and the lease Albemarle Street. That distance from the party wall between Nos. 20 to Christopher and 21 extends to the North wall of the present Grand Staircase and Monck, 2nd Duke of we can therefore easily recognise the original core of what became 21 Albemarle (1653- Albemarle Street. The extension to No. 20 was certainly constructed 1688), who later sold after 1709 and before 1746 but it may have existed, at least in part, the whole estate to the syndicate. As part of the overall development plan the developers had also constructed a road connecting Figure 1. Street plan with field boundaries superimposed. Bond Street with Hay Hill along the boundary of the freehold land on the leasehold property to the north. This road was to be the southern boundary of a planned Albemarle Square, never to be realised because of the financial failure of the developers. Their failure meant that, when the young Henry d’Auverquerque, Earl of Grantham (c.1672-1754), the first owner of No. 20, took up residence in his new house it faced towards open country to the north across the "new" road and west Figure 2. Plan showing the complex subdivision of Roberts’s lease. 4 5 before 1723, the date when Grantham and his fellow lessees obtained could be established. In particular, there would have been no need the writ which allowed them to move Grafton Street to its present for a main stair in Grantham’s original extension since a particularly position. Figures 2 and 3 show, respectively, the outline and splendid cantilevered one, which still exists although currently in a dimensions of Grantham’s leasehold, and the built-up part of sadly decayed setting, was already present in the main house. The Grantham’s property in about 1760 soon after Grantham’s death in present Grand Staircase in No. 21 is dated stylistically at around 1754 and the subsequent separation of Nos. 20 and 21 into separate 1756, a date which fits perfectly with the known period of separation private residences. of the two houses, and was presumably inserted into a space occupied by rooms on the ground and first floors at that end of the Grantham left no heir and his executors disposed of the property to existing building. To reach the second and third floors it would have John Roberts (d.1772), of whom little is known, and William Mellish. been necessary to utilise the service stair, shown on the ground plan The process of separation seems to have taken place during 1756 and in Figure 3, which ran from the basement up to the third floor; most 1757 and clearly a good deal of internal reorganisation was of this stair was moved eastward towards the rear of the site after the necessary, especially in No. 21, before two independent households Royal Institution began to modify the private house for its own purposes but the original section connecting the second and third floors remains to this day. As can be seen from Figure 3, Mellish, a married man with four children, lived in the more spacious No. 20 as Roberts’s tenant while Roberts, apparently a bachelor, took over No. 21. It is likely that the basement kitchen and other domestic facilities, which existed in the rear garden area when the Royal Institution took over the house, also date from this period of separation. Roberts as the recorded owner of the residue of the original lease was faced, as were other owners, with its imminent expiry in 1767.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Short History of the Royal Aeronautical Society
    A SHORT HISTORY OF THE ROYAL AERONAUTICAL SOCIETY Royal Aeronautical Society Council Dinner at the Science Museum on 26 May 1932 with Guest of Honour Miss Amelia Earhart. Edited by Chris Male MRAeS Royal Aeronautical Society www.aerosociety.com Afterburner Society News RAeS 150th ANNIVERSARY www.aerosociety.com/150 The Royal Aeronautical Society: Part 1 – The early years The Beginning “At a meeting held at Argyll Lodge, Campden Hill, Right: The first Aeronautical on 12 January 1866, His Grace The Duke of Argyll Exhibition, Crystal Palace, 1868, showing the presiding; also present Mr James Glaisher, Dr Hugh Stringfellow Triplane model W. Diamond, Mr F.H. Wenham, Mr James Wm. Butler and other exhibits. No fewer and Mr F.W. Brearey. Mr Glaisher read the following than 77 exhibits were address: collected together, including ‘The first application of the Balloon as a means of engines, lighter- and heavier- than-air models, kites and ascending into the upper regions of the plans of projected machines. atmosphere has been almost within the recollection A special Juror’s Report on on ‘Aerial locomotion and the laws by which heavy of men now living but with the exception of some the exhibits was issued. bodies impelled through air are sustained’. of the early experimenters it has scarcely occupied Below: Frederick W Brearey, Wenham’s lecture is now one of the aeronautical Secretary of the the attention of scientific men, nor has the subject of Aeronautical Society of Great classics and was the beginning of the pattern of aeronautics been properly recognised as a distinct Britain, 1866-1896.
    [Show full text]
  • Rapier House, Turnmill Street, London, EC I I'. L.Reruti,E
    REDHEADS ADVERTISING LTD. SOMMERVILLE & MILNE 21 Eldon LTD. Square, Newcastle -on -Tyne, 1. 216 Bothwell Street, Glasgow, C.2. Scotland. REX PUBLICITY SERVICE LTD. Director S Manager: J. Bruce Omand. 131-134 New Bond Street, London, W.I. THE W. J. SOUTHCOMBE ADVERTISING Telephone: 'Mayfair 7571. AGENCY LTD. T.Y. Executive: R. C. Granger. 167 Strand, oLndon, W.C.2. Telephone: RIPLEY, PRESTON & CO. LTD. Temple Bar 4273. Ludgate House, 107-111 Fleet Street, Lon- SPOTTISWOODE ADVERTISING LTD. don, E.C.4. Telephone: Central 8672. 34 Brook Street, London, W.1. Telephone: T.V. Executive: Walter A. Clare. Hyde Park 1221 MAX RITSON & PARTNERS LTD. T.I Lxecutive: W. J. Barter. 33 Henrietta Street, London, W.C.2. Tele- HENRY SQUIRE & CO. LTD. phone: Temple Bar 3861. Canada House, Norfolk Street, London, W.C. T.V. Executive: Roy G. Clark. 2. Telephone: Temple Bar 9093. ROE TELEVISION LTD. I I'. L.reruti,e: S. Windridge. (F. John Roe Ltd.) 20 St. Ann's Square, STEELE'S ADVERTISING SERVICE LTD. Manchester & 73 Grosvenor Street, London, 34 Brook Street, London, W.1. W.1. Telephone: Grosvenor 8228. T.Y. Executives: Graham Roe, Derek J. Roe. STEPHENS ADVERTISING SERVICE LTD. Clarendon House, 11-12 Clifford Street, ROLES & PARKER LTD. New Bond Street, London, W.1. Telephone: Rapier House, Turnmill Street, London, E.C. Hyde Park 1. 1641. Telephone: Clerkenwell 0545. Executive: E. W. R. T.V. Executive: H. T. Parker. Galley. STRAND PUBLICITY LTD. G. S. ROYDS LTD. 10 Stanhope Row, London, W.1. Telephone: 160 Piccadilly, London, W1.. Telephone: Grosvenor 1352. Hyde Park 8238.
    [Show full text]
  • Evidence Synthesis on the EU-UK Relationship on Research and Innovation January 2018
    Evidence synthesis on the EU-UK relationship on research and innovation January 2018 1. Introduction The Royal Society and the Wellcome Trust have undertaken a rapid evidence synthesis on the EU-UK research and innovation relationship as part of their Future Partnership Project. Organisations and individuals were invited to submit evidence and analyses for inclusion. Evidence was also gathered through internet searches to ensure an inclusive approach. The Annex is a summary of the methods. Two questions were used in gathering evidence and in determining the material in scope: 1. What incentives, infrastructure and mechanisms can be accessed by research and innovation organisations, funders and individuals in Member States to support collaborations? 2. How do Member States currently use and benefit from these and how might they be affected by Brexit? This paper is a synthesis of the evidence and covers funding, infrastructures, mobility, collaboration and regulation, with a focus on links between the EU and the UK. 2. Overview of the evidence base A few major reports were of particular relevance; the Royal Society’s three reports on the role of the EU in UK research and innovation and two reports commissioned from Technopolis Group by UK organisations, on the role of EU funding in UK research and innovation and the impact of collaboration: the value of UK medical research to EU science and health1,2. These documents were often referenced in other submissions. A report from the Lords Science and Technology Committee’s inquiry on EU Membership and UK Science also summarises many sources of evidence relevant to this synthesis.
    [Show full text]
  • Common Acronyms Engineers SOE Society of Operations Engineers Licensed Members TWI the Welding Institute BCS the Chartered Institute for IT
    SEE Society of Environmental Common Acronyms Engineers SOE Society of Operations Engineers Licensed Members TWI The Welding Institute BCS The Chartered Institute for IT BINDT British Institute of Non-Destructive Testing Professional Affiliates CIBSE Chartered Institution of Building ACostE Association of Cost Engineers Services Engineers APM Association for Project CIHT Chartered Institution of Highways Management and Transportation CABE Chartered Association of Building CIPHE Chartered Institute of Plumbing and Engineers Heating Engineering CQI Chartered Quality Institute CIWEM Chartered Institution of Water and IAEA Institute of Automotive Engineer Environmental Management Assessors EI Energy Institute IAT Institute of Asphalt Technology IAgrE Institution of Agricultural Engineers ICES Chartered Institution of Civil ICE Institution of Civil Engineers Engineering Surveyors IChemE Institution of Chemical Engineers ICorr Institute of Corrosion ICME Institute of Cast Metals Engineers ICT Institute of Concrete Technology IED Institution of Engineering IDE Institute of Demolition Engineers Designers IDGTE Institution of Diesel and Gas IET Institution of Engineering and Turbine Engineers Technology IExpE Institute of Explosives Engineers IFE Institution of Fire Engineers IMA Institute of Mathematics and its IGEM Institution of Gas Engineers and Applications Managers IMF Institute of Materials Finishing IHE Institute of Highway Engineers INCOSE UK International Council on Systems Engineering (UK Chapter) IHEEM Institute of Healthcare Engineering
    [Show full text]
  • CHRIST CHURCH LIBRARY NEWSLETTER Volume 5, Issue 1 Michaelmas 2008
    CHRIST CHURCH LIBRARY NEWSLETTER Volume 5, Issue 1 Michaelmas 2008 ISSN 1756-6797 (Print), ISSN 1756-6800 (Online) Book Collections, Private Homes and The Art of Science - Thomas Roberts’ Seventeenth Century England Navigation Instruments in the Upper Library Since private collections grew substantially in size In 1760 Christ Church Upper Library, the building of during the seventeenth century, and since the which began in 1717 to the designs of Dean Henry ownership of books were increasingly felt to Aldrich developed by the Oxford architect-academic represent the fulfilment of a gentleman’s social, Dr George Clarke, was completed with the applied cultural and moral responsibilities, collections began decoration of its ceiling and walls. Light, airy and with to move into the more public areas of the house. its book-cases lining the walls rather than jutting into the rooms at right angles, the Upper Library The growing literacy in the idioms of renaissance resembled the audience chamber of a cultured classicism also encouraged a greater formality in Central European ruler rather than the dark, house-planning and internal arrangement which monastic rooms of Oxford’s earlier libraries such as fostered the development of the library as a grand Merton and Duke Humfrey’s, and of course, the apartment. original medieval library of the College, and the However, the movement towards the eighteenth- decoration enhanced the effect of refined classicism. century formal library as a family room was never straight-forward; in part because the function of the The applied decoration was the work of a local closet/library space remained so fluid and nebulous.
    [Show full text]
  • Wellcome Trust Annual Report and Financial Statements 2018 Is © the Wellcome Trust and Is Licensed Under Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 UK
    Annual Report and Financial Statements 2018 Table of contents Report from Chair 3 Report from Director 4 Trustee’s Report 5 What we do 6 Review of Charitable Activities 7 Review of Investment Activities 18 Financial Review 28 Structure and Governance 33 Social Responsibility 38 Risk Management 40 Remuneration Report 42 Nomination Committee Report 44 Remuneration Committee Report 45 Investment Committee Report 46 Audit and Risk Committee Report 47 Independent Auditor’s Report 49 Financial Statements 59 Consolidated Statement of Financial Activities 60 Consolidated Balance Sheet 61 Statement of Financial Activities of the Trust 62 Balance Sheet of the Trust 63 Consolidated Cash Flow Statement 64 Notes to the Financial Statements 65 Reference and Administrative Details 116 2 Table of Contents Wellcome Trust Annual Report 2018 Report from Chair In March 2018, the Board of Governors and I year, driven by the performance of the investment decided to reappoint Jeremy Farrar as Director portfolio, which returned 13.4%, or 10.7% after of Wellcome for a further five years. Under his inflation. This year has seen a return of market leadership, Wellcome is ambitious, innovative and volatility as the economic cycle has matured. willing to take risks in pursuit of our mission of Central Banks, led by the US Federal Reserve, have improving health by helping great ideas to thrive. begun to raise interest rates and remove the prop to Wellcome’s work is underpinned by the financial asset prices previously provided by quantitative strength we derive from our £25.9 billion investment easing. Uncertainties about Brexit have generated portfolio.
    [Show full text]
  • Royal Society, 1985
    The Public Understanding of Science Report of a Royal Society adhoc Group endorsed by the Council of the Royal Society The Royal Society 6 Carlton House Terrace London SWlY 5AG CONTENTS Page Preface 5 Summary 6 1. Introduction 7 2. Why it matters 9 3. The present position 12 4. Formal education 17 5. The mass media 2 1 6. ' The scientific community 24 7. Public lectures, children's activities, museums and libraries 27 8. Industry 29 9. Conclusions and recommendations 31 Annexes A. List of those submitting evidence B. Visits and seminars C. Selected bibliography PREFACE This report was prepared by an ad hoc group under the chairmanship of Dr W.F. Bodmer, F.R.S.; it has been endorsed by the Council of the Royal Society. It deals with an issue that is important not only, or even mainly, for the scientific community but also for the nation as a whole and for each individual within it. More than ever, people need some understanding of science, whether they are involved in decision-making at a national or local level, in managing industrial companies, in skilled or semi-skilled employment, in voting as private citizens or in making a wide range of personal decisions. In publishing this report the Council hopes that it will highlight this need for an overall awareness of the nature of science and, more particularly, of the way that science and technology pervade modern life, and that it will generate both debate and decisions on how best they can be fostered. The report makes a number of recommendations.
    [Show full text]
  • Wellcome Trust Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019 Is © the Wellcome Trust and Is Licensed Under Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 UK
    Annual Report and Financial Statements 2019 Table of contents Report from Chair 3 Report from Director 5 Trustee’s Report 7 What we do 8 Review of Charitable Activities 9 Review of Investment Activities 21 Financial Review 31 Structure and Governance 36 Social Responsibility 40 Risk Management 42 Remuneration Report 44 Remuneration Committee Report 46 Nomination Committee Report 47 Investment Committee Report 48 Audit and Risk Committee Report 49 Independent Auditor’s Report 52 Financial Statements 61 Consolidated Statement of Financial Activities 62 Consolidated Balance Sheet 63 Statement of Financial Activities of the Trust 64 Balance Sheet of the Trust 65 Consolidated Cash Flow Statement 66 Notes to the Financial Statements 67 Alternative Performance Measures and Key Performance Indicators 114 Glossary of Terms 115 Reference and Administrative Details 116 Table of Contents Wellcome Trust Annual Report 2019 | 2 Report from Chair During my tenure at Wellcome, which ends in The macro environment is increasingly challenging, 2020, I count myself lucky to have had the which has created volatility in financial markets. opportunity to meet inspiring people from a rich Q4 2018 was a very difficult quarter, but the diversity of sectors, backgrounds, specialisms resumption of interest rate cuts by the US Federal and scientific fields. Reserve underpinned another year of gains for our portfolio. We recognise that the cycle is extended, Wellcome’s achievements belong to the people and that the portfolio is likely to face more who work here and to the people we fund – it is challenging times ahead. a partnership that continues to grow stronger, more influential and more ambitious, spurred by The team is working hard to ensure that our independence.
    [Show full text]
  • Guides to the Royal Institution of Great Britain: 1 HISTORY
    Guides to the Royal Institution of Great Britain: 1 HISTORY Theo James presenting a bouquet to HM The Queen on the occasion of her bicentenary visit, 7 December 1999. by Frank A.J.L. James The Director, Susan Greenfield, looks on Front page: Façade of the Royal Institution added in 1837. Watercolour by T.H. Shepherd or more than two hundred years the Royal Institution of Great The Royal Institution was founded at a meeting on 7 March 1799 at FBritain has been at the centre of scientific research and the the Soho Square house of the President of the Royal Society, Joseph popularisation of science in this country. Within its walls some of the Banks (1743-1820). A list of fifty-eight names was read of gentlemen major scientific discoveries of the last two centuries have been made. who had agreed to contribute fifty guineas each to be a Proprietor of Chemists and physicists - such as Humphry Davy, Michael Faraday, a new John Tyndall, James Dewar, Lord Rayleigh, William Henry Bragg, INSTITUTION FOR DIFFUSING THE KNOWLEDGE, AND FACILITATING Henry Dale, Eric Rideal, William Lawrence Bragg and George Porter THE GENERAL INTRODUCTION, OF USEFUL MECHANICAL - carried out much of their major research here. The technological INVENTIONS AND IMPROVEMENTS; AND FOR TEACHING, BY COURSES applications of some of this research has transformed the way we OF PHILOSOPHICAL LECTURES AND EXPERIMENTS, THE APPLICATION live. Furthermore, most of these scientists were first rate OF SCIENCE TO THE COMMON PURPOSES OF LIFE. communicators who were able to inspire their audiences with an appreciation of science.
    [Show full text]
  • Sir Roger Pratt's Library
    Reading as a Gentleman and an Architect: Sir Roger Pratt’s Library by KIMBERLEY SKELTON This article illuminates the changes in English seventeenth-century architectural practice when members of the gentry educated themselves as architectural professionals and as a result several became noted practitioners. The author analyses the rarely examined notes and library of Sir Roger Pratt to explore how a seventeenth-century gentleman both studied and practised architecture literally as both gentleman and architect. Also she considers Pratt’s notes chronologically, rather than according to their previous thematic reorganisation by R. T. Gunther (1928), and offers a full reconstruction of Pratt’s library beyond Gunther’s catalogue of surviving volumes. Mid-seventeenth-century England experienced a sharp change in architectural practice and education. For the first time, members of the gentry began to design buildings and to educate themselves as professionals in architecture. From the late 1650s, Sir Roger Pratt designed country houses, and several members of the landed and educated classes became prominent architects: Sir Christopher Wren, Robert Hooke, Hugh May, William Winde, William Samwell, and William Talman. These gentleman architects brought new techniques to the study of architecture since they were more highly trained in analysing text than image. Scholars have yet to consider the seventeenth-century emergence of the gentleman architect in detail; they have focused more on monographic studies of architects, patronage, and building types than on shifts in the architectural profession.1 This article explores how a seventeenth-century gentleman would both study and practise architecture; it considers the rarely examined library and manuscript notes of Sir Roger Pratt.2 I argue that Pratt practised and read as literally patron and architect – using the techniques of a patron to answer the questions of an architect designing for English geographical and social particularities.
    [Show full text]
  • CAMDEN STREET NAMES and Their Origins
    CAMDEN STREET NAMES and their origins © David A. Hayes and Camden History Society, 2020 Introduction Listed alphabetically are In 1853, in London as a whole, there were o all present-day street names in, or partly 25 Albert Streets, 25 Victoria, 37 King, 27 Queen, within, the London Borough of Camden 22 Princes, 17 Duke, 34 York and 23 Gloucester (created in 1965); Streets; not to mention the countless similarly named Places, Roads, Squares, Terraces, Lanes, o abolished names of streets, terraces, Walks, Courts, Alleys, Mews, Yards, Rents, Rows, alleyways, courts, yards and mews, which Gardens and Buildings. have existed since c.1800 in the former boroughs of Hampstead, Holborn and St Encouraged by the General Post Office, a street Pancras (formed in 1900) or the civil renaming scheme was started in 1857 by the parishes they replaced; newly-formed Metropolitan Board of Works o some named footpaths. (MBW), and administered by its ‘Street Nomenclature Office’. The project was continued Under each heading, extant street names are after 1889 under its successor body, the London itemised first, in bold face. These are followed, in County Council (LCC), with a final spate of name normal type, by names superseded through changes in 1936-39. renaming, and those of wholly vanished streets. Key to symbols used: The naming of streets → renamed as …, with the new name ← renamed from …, with the old Early street names would be chosen by the name and year of renaming if known developer or builder, or the owner of the land. Since the mid-19th century, names have required Many roads were initially lined by individually local-authority approval, initially from parish named Terraces, Rows or Places, with houses Vestries, and then from the Metropolitan Board of numbered within them.
    [Show full text]
  • 'X'marks the Spot: the History and Historiography of Coleshill House
    UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON FACULTY OF HUMANITIES Department of History ‘X’ Marks the Spot: The History and Historiography of Coleshill House, Berkshire by Karen Fielder Thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy June 2012 UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON ABSTRACT FACULTY OF HUMANITIES DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY Doctor of Philosophy ‘X’ MARKS THE SPOT: THE HISTORY AND HISTORIOGRAPHY OF COLESHILL HOUSE, BERKSHIRE by Karen Fielder Coleshill House was a much admired seventeenth-century country house which the architectural historian John Summerson referred to as ‘a statement of the utmost value to British architecture’. Following a disastrous fire in September 1952 the remains of the house were demolished amidst much controversy shortly before the Coleshill estate including the house were due to pass to the National Trust. The editor of The Connoisseur, L.G.G. Ramsey, published a piece in the magazine in 1953 lamenting the loss of what he described as ‘the most important and significant single house in England’. ‘Now’, he wrote, ‘only X marks the spot where Coleshill once stood’. Visiting the site of the house today on the Trust’s Coleshill estate there remains a palpable sense of the absent building. This thesis engages with the house that continues to exist in the realm of the imagination, and asks how Coleshill is brought to mind not simply through the visual signals that remain on the estate, but also through the mental reckoning resulting from what we know and understand of the house. In particular, this project explores the complexities of how the idea of Coleshill as a canonical work in British architectural histories was created and sustained over time.
    [Show full text]