23 March 2014 CSF Amended 11 01 2014:Layout 1 11/01/2014 11:41 Page 2
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
2006 Calvin Bibliography
2006 Calvin Bibliography Compiled by Paul Fields I. Calvin's Life and Times A. Biography B. Cultural Context Intellectual History C. Cultural Context Social History D. Friends and Associates E. Polemical Relationships II. Calvin's Works A. Works and Selections B. Critique III. Calvin's Theology A. Overview B. Doctrine of God 1. Overview 2. Creation 3. Knowledge of God 4. Providence 5. Trinity C. Doctrine of Christ D. Doctrine of Salvation 1. Overview 2. Atonement 3. Deification 4. Faith 5. Justification 6. Predestination E. Doctrine of Humanity 1. Covenant 2. Grace 3. Image of God 4. Law 5. Natural Law 6. Soul 7. Free Will F. Doctrine of Christian Life 1. Angels 2. Piety 3. Prayer 4. Sanctification 5. Vows G. Ecclesiology 1. Overview 2. Discipline 3. Polity H. Worship 1. Overview 2. Buildings 3. Images 4. Liturgy 5. Mariology 6. Music 7. Preaching and Sacraments IV. Calvin and SocialEthical Issues V. Calvin and Political Issues VI. Calvinism A. Theological Influence 1. Christian Life 2. Ecclesiology 3. Eschatology 4. Lord's Supper 5. Natural Law 6. Preaching 7. Predestination 8. Salvation 9. Worship B. Cultural Influence 1. Arts 2. Education 3. Literature 4. Printing C. Social, Economic, and Political Influence D. International Influence 1. Croatia 2. England 3. Europe 4. France 5. Germany 6. Hungary 7. Korea 8. Latin America 9. Netherlands 10. Poland 11. Scotland 12. United States E. Critique F. Book Reviews G. Bibliographies I. Calvin’s Life and Times A. Biography Cottret, Bernard. “Noms de lieux: Ignace de Loyola, Jean Calvin, John Wesley.” Études Théologiques et Religieuses 80, no. -
Statutes and Ordinances of the University
CHAPTER IX FACULTIES, DEPARTMENTS, AND OTHER INSTITUTIONS UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF THE GENERAL BOARD The provisions contained in this Chapter are Regulations of the General Board GENERAL REGULATIONS FOR FACULTIES 1. There shall be a Faculty in respect of each of the subjects enumerated in the Schedule appended to these regulations. Preliminary 2. In October of every year, not later than the first day of Full Term, the Registrary shall publish a lists. preliminary list of the members of each Faculty. Objections. 3. Objections to the inclusion or omission of any name may be addressed to the Secretary of the Board of the Faculty concerned, and shall be decided by that Board subject to an appeal to the General Board. Any such decision of a Faculty Board or the General Board shall be communicated to the objector and to the Registrary forthwith. Corrected lists. 4. As early as possible in the Michaelmas Term each year, and in any case not later than 28 October, the Secretary of the Board of each Faculty shall send to the Registrary the names of persons who are members of the Faculty under Regulation 1(c) of the Regulations for Faculty Membership. Promulgation 5. On the fifth weekday of November the Registrary shall promulgate the lists of the Faculties, and of lists. the lists so promulgated shall constitute the several Faculties for the purpose of the annual meetings of Annual meetings. the Faculties. Those meetings shall be held after the sixth day and before the twenty-fifth day of November. Between the promulgation of the lists and the end of the academical year the Registrary shall not be required to ascertain or to notify any change that may occur in the membership of a Faculty. -
HUMAN GENE MAPPING WORKSHOPS C.1973–C.1991
HUMAN GENE MAPPING WORKSHOPS c.1973–c.1991 The transcript of a Witness Seminar held by the History of Modern Biomedicine Research Group, Queen Mary University of London, on 25 March 2014 Edited by E M Jones and E M Tansey Volume 54 2015 ©The Trustee of the Wellcome Trust, London, 2015 First published by Queen Mary University of London, 2015 The History of Modern Biomedicine Research Group is funded by the Wellcome Trust, which is a registered charity, no. 210183. ISBN 978 1 91019 5031 All volumes are freely available online at www.histmodbiomed.org Please cite as: Jones E M, Tansey E M. (eds) (2015) Human Gene Mapping Workshops c.1973–c.1991. Wellcome Witnesses to Contemporary Medicine, vol. 54. London: Queen Mary University of London. CONTENTS What is a Witness Seminar? v Acknowledgements E M Tansey and E M Jones vii Illustrations and credits ix Abbreviations and ancillary guides xi Introduction Professor Peter Goodfellow xiii Transcript Edited by E M Jones and E M Tansey 1 Appendix 1 Photographs of participants at HGM1, Yale; ‘New Haven Conference 1973: First International Workshop on Human Gene Mapping’ 90 Appendix 2 Photograph of (EMBO) workshop on ‘Cell Hybridization and Somatic Cell Genetics’, 1973 96 Biographical notes 99 References 109 Index 129 Witness Seminars: Meetings and publications 141 WHAT IS A WITNESS SEMINAR? The Witness Seminar is a specialized form of oral history, where several individuals associated with a particular set of circumstances or events are invited to meet together to discuss, debate, and agree or disagree about their memories. The meeting is recorded, transcribed, and edited for publication. -
53Rd International Congress on Medieval Studies
53rd International Congress on Medieval Studies May 10–13, 2018 Medieval Institute College of Arts and Sciences Western Michigan University 1903 W. Michigan Ave. Kalamazoo, MI 49008-5432 wmich.edu/medieval 2018 i Table of Contents Welcome Letter iii Registration iv-v On-Campus Housing vi-vii Food viii-ix Travel x Driving and Parking xi Logistics and Amenities xii-xiii Varia xiv Off-Campus Accommodations vx Hotel Shuttle Routes xvi Hotel Shuttle Schedules xvii Campus Shuttles xviii Mailings xix Exhibits Hall xx Exhibitors xxi Plenary Lectures xxii Reception of the Classics in the Middle Ages Lecture xxiii Screenings xxiv Social Media xxv Advance Notice—2019 Congress xxvi The Congress: How It Works xxvii The Congress Academic Program xxviii-xxix Travel Awards xxx The Otto Gründler Book Prize xxxi Richard Rawlinson Center xxxii Center for Cistercian and Monastic Studies xxxiii M.A. Program in Medieval Studies xxxiv Medieval Institute Publications xxxv Endowment and Gift Funds xxxvi 2018 Congress Schedule of Events 1–192 Index of Sponsoring Organizations 193–198 Index of Participants 199–218 Floor Plans M-1 – M-9 List of Advertisers Advertising A-1 – A-36 Color Maps ii Dear colleagues, It’s a balmy 9 degrees here in Kalamazoo today, but I can’t complain—too much— because Kalamazoo will not feel the wrath of the “bomb cyclone” and polar vortex due to hit the East Coast later this week, the first week of 2018. Nonetheless, today in Kalamazoo, I long for spring and what it brings: the warmth of the weather, my colleagues and friends who will come in May to the International Congress on Medieval Studies. -
LD5655.V855 1993.R857.Pdf
INITIATING INTERNATIONAL COLLABORATION: A STUDY OF THE HUMAN GENOME ORGANIZATION by Deborah Rumrill Thesis submitted to the faculty of the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE in Science and Technology Studies APPROVED: Mj Lallon Doris Zallen Av)eM rg Ann La Berg James Bohland July 1993 Blacksburg, Virginia INITIATING INTERNATIONAL COLLABORATION: A STUDY OF THE HUMAN GENOME ORGANIZATION by Deborah G. C. Rumrill Committee Chair: Doris T. Zallen Department of Science and Technology Studies (ABSTRACT) The formation of the Human Genome Organization, nicknamed HUGO, in 1988 was a response by scientists to the increasing number of programs designed to examine in detail human genetic material that were developing worldwide in the mid 1980s and the perceived need for initiating international collaboration among the genomic researchers. Despite the expectations of its founders, the Human Genome Organization has not attained immediate acceptance either inside or outside the scientific community, struggling since its inception to gain credibility. Although the organization has been successful as well as unsuccessful in its efforts to initiate international collaboration, there has been little or no analysis of the underlying reasons for these outcomes. This study examines the collaborative activities of the organization, which are new to the biological community in terms of kind and scale, and finds two conditions to be influential in the outcome of the organization’s efforts: 1) the prior existence of a model for the type of collaboration attempted; and 2) the existence or creation of a financial or political incentive to accept a new collaborative activity. -
Historical Painting Techniques, Materials, and Studio Practice
Historical Painting Techniques, Materials, and Studio Practice PUBLICATIONS COORDINATION: Dinah Berland EDITING & PRODUCTION COORDINATION: Corinne Lightweaver EDITORIAL CONSULTATION: Jo Hill COVER DESIGN: Jackie Gallagher-Lange PRODUCTION & PRINTING: Allen Press, Inc., Lawrence, Kansas SYMPOSIUM ORGANIZERS: Erma Hermens, Art History Institute of the University of Leiden Marja Peek, Central Research Laboratory for Objects of Art and Science, Amsterdam © 1995 by The J. Paul Getty Trust All rights reserved Printed in the United States of America ISBN 0-89236-322-3 The Getty Conservation Institute is committed to the preservation of cultural heritage worldwide. The Institute seeks to advance scientiRc knowledge and professional practice and to raise public awareness of conservation. Through research, training, documentation, exchange of information, and ReId projects, the Institute addresses issues related to the conservation of museum objects and archival collections, archaeological monuments and sites, and historic bUildings and cities. The Institute is an operating program of the J. Paul Getty Trust. COVER ILLUSTRATION Gherardo Cibo, "Colchico," folio 17r of Herbarium, ca. 1570. Courtesy of the British Library. FRONTISPIECE Detail from Jan Baptiste Collaert, Color Olivi, 1566-1628. After Johannes Stradanus. Courtesy of the Rijksmuseum-Stichting, Amsterdam. Library of Congress Cataloguing-in-Publication Data Historical painting techniques, materials, and studio practice : preprints of a symposium [held at] University of Leiden, the Netherlands, 26-29 June 1995/ edited by Arie Wallert, Erma Hermens, and Marja Peek. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references. ISBN 0-89236-322-3 (pbk.) 1. Painting-Techniques-Congresses. 2. Artists' materials- -Congresses. 3. Polychromy-Congresses. I. Wallert, Arie, 1950- II. Hermens, Erma, 1958- . III. Peek, Marja, 1961- ND1500.H57 1995 751' .09-dc20 95-9805 CIP Second printing 1996 iv Contents vii Foreword viii Preface 1 Leslie A. -
Michaelmas Term 2002 Special No.6 Part I
2 OFFICERS NUMBER–MICHAELMAS TERM 2002 SPECIAL NO.6 PART I Chancellor: H.R.H. The Prince PHILIP, Duke of Edinburgh, T Vice-Chancellor: 1996, Prof. Sir Alec BROERS, CHU, 2003 Deputy Vice-Chancellors: for 2002–2003: A. M. LONSDALE, NH,M.J.GRANT, CL,O.S.O’NEILL, N, Sir ROGER TOMKYS, PEM,D.E.NEWLAND, SE,S.G.FLEET, DOW,G.JOHNSON, W Pro-Vice-Chancellors: 1998, A. M. LONSDALE, NH, 30 June 2004 2001, M. GRANT, CL, 31 Dec. 2004 High Steward: 2001, Dame BRIDGET OGILVIE, G Deputy High Steward: 1983, The Rt Hon. Lord RICHARDSON, CAI Commissary: 2002, Lord MACKAY, T Proctors for 2002–2003: J. D. M ACDONALD, CAI Deputy: D. J. CHIVERS, SE T. N. M ILNER, PET Deputy: V.E. IZZET, CHR Orator: 1993, A. J. BOWEN, JE Registrary: 1997, T. J. MEAD, W Deputy Registrary: 1993, N. J. B. A. BRANSON, DAR Secretary General of the Faculties: 1992, D. A. LIVESEY, EM Treasurer: 1993, J. M. WOMACK, TH Librarian: 1994, P.K. FOX, SE Deputy Librarians: 1996, D. J. HALL, W 2000, A. MURRAY, W Director of the Fitzwilliam Museum and Marlay Curator: 1995, D. D. ROBINSON, M Development Director: 2002, P.AGAR, SE Esquire Bedells: 1996, J. P.EMMINES, PET 1997, J. H. WILLIAMS, HH University Advocate: 1999, N. M. PADFIELD, F, 2003 Deputy University Advocate: 1999, P.J. ROGERSON, CAI, 2003 OFFICERS IN INSTITUTIONS PLACED UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF THE GENERAL BOARD PROFESSORS Accounting Vacant Aeronautical Engineering, Francis Mond 1996 W.N. DAWES, CHU Aerothermal Technology 2000 H. P.HODSON, G African Archaeology 2001 D. -
Designing Debate: the Entanglement of Speculative Design and Upstream Engagement
Designing Debate: The Entanglement of Speculative Design and Upstream Engagement Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) 30th July 2015 Tobie Kerridge Design Department Goldsmiths, University of London Designing Debate: The Entanglement of Speculative Design and Upstream Engagement DECLARATION The work presented in this thesis is my own. Signed: Tobie Kerridge Tobie Kerridge, Design Department, Goldsmiths, University of London 2 Designing Debate: The Entanglement of Speculative Design and Upstream Engagement ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The supervisory energies of Bill Gaver and Mike Michael have been boundless. Bill you have helped me develop an academic account of design practice that owes much to the intelligence and incisiveness of your own writing. MiKe your provocative treatment of public engagement and generous dealings with speculative design have enabled an analytical account of these practices. I have benefited from substantial feedbacK from my upgrade examiners Sarah Kember and Jennifer Gabrys, and responded to the insightful comments of my viva examiners Carl DiSalvo and Jonas Löwgren in the body of this final transcript. Colleagues at Goldsmiths, in Design and beyond, you have provided support, discussion, and advice. Thank you for your patience and generosity Andy Boucher, Sarah Pennington, Alex WilKie, Nadine Jarvis, Dave Cameron, Juliet Sprake, Matt Ward, Martin Conreen, Kay Stables, Janis Jefferies, Mathilda Tham, Rosario Hutardo and Nina WaKeford, along with fellow PhD-ers Lisa George, Rose Sinclair and Hannah -
The People of the British Isles: a Statistical Analysis of the Genetics Of
SEMINAR Victorian Centre for Biostatistics Thursday 25 th June 2015 9.30am to 10.30am Seminar Room 2, Level 5 The Alfred Centre 99 Commercial Road, Prahran The People of the British Isles: A statistical analysis of the genetics of the UK Dr Stephen Leslie Group Leader in Statistical Genetics Murdoch Childrens Research Institute In this talk Stephen will present some of the as yet unpublished findings from the People of the British Isles project. In particular he will show that using newly developed statistical techniques one can uncover subtle genetic differences between people from different regions of the UK at a hitherto unprecedented level of detail. For example, one can separate the neighbouring counties of Devon and Cornwall, or two islands of Orkney, using only genetic information. Stephen will then show how these genetic differences reflect current historical and archaeological knowledge, as well as providing new insights into the historical make-up of the British population, and the movement of people from Europe into the British Isles. This is the first detailed analysis of very fine-scale genetic differences and their origin in a population of very similar humans. The key to the findings of this study is the careful sampling strategy and an approach to statistical analysis that accounts for the correlation structure of the genome. Dr Stephen Leslie is an Australian statistician working in the field of mathematical genetics. Stephen obtained his doctorate from the Department of Statistics, University of Oxford in 2008, under the supervision of Professor Peter Donnelly FRS. Prof Donnelly is one of the major figures worldwide in statistical and population genetics. -
Robert Cook-Deegan Human Genome Archive
Bioethics Research Library The Joseph and Rose Kennedy Institute of Ethics bioethics.georgetown.edu A Guide to the Archival Collection of The Robert Cook-Deegan Human Genome Archive Set 1 April, 2013 Bioethics Research Library Joseph and Rose Kennedy Institute of Ethics Georgetown University Washington, D.C. Overview The Robert Cook-Deegan Human Genome Archive is founded on the bibliography of The Gene Wars: Science, Politics, and the Human Genome. The archive encompasses both physical and digital materials related to The Human Genome Project (HGP) and includes correspondence, government reports, background information, and oral histories from prominent participants in the project. Hosted by the Bioethics Research Library at Georgetown University the archive is comprised of 20.85 linear feet of materials currently and is expected to grow as new materials are processed and added to the collection. Most of the materials comprising the archive were obtained between the years 1986 and 1994. However, several of the documents are dated earlier. Introduction This box listing was created in order to assist the Bioethics Research Library in its digitization effort for the archive and is being shared as a resource to our patrons to assist in their use of the collection. The archive consists of 44 separate archive boxes broken down into three separate sets. Set one is comprised of nine boxes, set two is comprised of seven boxes, and set three is comprised of 28 boxes. Each set corresponds to a distinct addition to the collection in the order in which they were given to the library. No value should be placed on the importance of any given set, or the order the boxes are in, as each was accessed, processed, and kept in the order in which they were received. -
2020.04.20.029819.Full.Pdf
bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.04.20.029819; this version posted April 21, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. Identity-by-descent detection across 487,409 British samples reveals fine-scale population structure, evolutionary history, and trait associations Juba Nait Saada1,C, Georgios Kalantzis1, Derek Shyr2, Martin Robinson3, Alexander Gusev4,5,*, and Pier Francesco Palamara1,6,C,* 1Department of Statistics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. 2Department of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02115, USA. 3Department of Computer Science, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. 4Brigham & Women’s Hospital, Division of Genetics, Boston, MA 02215, USA. 5Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215, USA. 6Wellcome Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. *Co-supervised this work. CCorrespondence: [email protected], [email protected] bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.04.20.029819; this version posted April 21, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. 1 Abstract 2 Detection of Identical-By-Descent (IBD) segments provides a fundamental measure of genetic relatedness and plays a key 3 role in a wide range of genomic analyses. -
CR Rao: Fisher Is the Founder of Modern Statistics
R.A. Fisher: Statistics as key tool for scientific research Daniel Peña Rector Universidad Carlos III de Madrid Facultat de Matemàtiques i Estadística, Universitat Poltècnica de Catalunya, 29 Septiembre 2011 Outline 1. Introduction 2. Youth and Education (1890-1919) 3. Rothamsted and London (1920-1942) 4. Cambridge and Adelaide (1943-1962) 5. Personality 6. The heritage from Fisher 7. Conclusion 2 1. Introduction • H. Hotelling: Laplace, Gauss, Pearson and Fisher are the co- founders of statistics and probability. • M. Frechet: K. Pearson and RA Fisher are the founders of Statistics. • CR Rao: Fisher is the founder of modern statistics. • B. Efron: Fisher is the single most important figure in 20th century statistics. 3 1. Introduction In the Kotzs and Johnson book, Breakthroughs in Statistics I and II, Number of contributions: • Fisher: 3 (Foundation of MS,22; SMRW,25; DE, 26) • Hotelling 2 (T, 31; CC, 36) • Neyman: 2 (HT, 33; Sampling, 34) • Wald 2 (Sequential, 45; SD,49) • Box 2 (EO,51; TS, 62) Note: After Vol III, Rao, Tukey and Smith are added with 2 contributions 4 1. Introduction (Fisher’s articles) • 56% on science • 44% in Statistics 5 2. First 29 years (1890-1919) • Born 17/2/1890 in London the 7th child • Poor eyesight since schoolboy • Scholarship in Caius College, Cambridge U., 1909. • Graduate in mathematics from Cambridge U. (1912) • Work as clerk and school teacher (1913-1919) • Married in 1917. • Reject work in K. Pearson’s lab to work in Rothamsted (1919) 6 Youth Contributions Inspired by Gosset (Student), works on exact sampling distribution statistics Proposed a general method of finding sampling distributions by n-dimensional geometry and found the exact distribution of the correlation coefficient Published 12 papers on Statistics and Genetics 7 Gosset and the t distribution The Probable Error of a Mean (Student 1908) that Before I had succeeded in solving my problem led to today’s t distribution was the lead article in analytically, I had endeavoured to do so the March 1908 issue of Biometrika.