DOCSLIB.ORG

OBO.SA 27 (D. Ben-Tor)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
OBO.SA 27 (D. Ben-Tor) Zurich Open Repository and Archive University of Zurich Main Library Strickhofstrasse 39 CH-8057 Zurich www.zora.uzh.ch Year: 2007 Scarabs, Chronology, and Interconnections: Egypt and Palestine in the Second Intermediate Period Ben-Tor, Daphna Abstract: The present study deals with relations between Egypt and the Levant during the Second Inter- mediate Period, based primarily on contemporary scarabs from both regions. The potential contribution of scarabs for the historical reconstruction of the Second Intermediate Period, especially with regard to Egyptian/Levantine relations, has long been recognized. Yet the controversy over scarab typologies ruled out scarabs as a reliable historical source. This study proposes a new typology of scarabs of the first half of the second millennium BCE, which is now feasible owing to recent studies of ceramic assemblages from Egypt and the Levant. Based on these studies one can determine the relative and absolute dates of deposits in which scarabs and scarab impressions have been found in both regions, and substantiate the corrrespondence of the Second Intermediate Period in Egypt with the Middle Bronze Age IIB in the Levant. The principal methodological difference between the present study and previous scarab studies is its treatment of the Egyptian and Palestinian series as two separate groups. The geographical classi- fication of the large corpus of scarabs, which previously had been dealt with as one entity, allowedfora systematic differentiation between Egyptian and Canaanite scarabs of this period and the establishment of separate stylistic and chronological typologies for each group. The historical conclusions presented in this study confirm the significance of scarabs as a primary source of information for reconstructing the history of the Second Intermediate Period in Egypt and the Levant. Posted at the Zurich Open Repository and Archive, University of Zurich ZORA URL: https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-137119 Monograph Published Version Originally published at: Ben-Tor, Daphna (2007). Scarabs, Chronology, and Interconnections: Egypt and Palestine in the Second Intermediate Period. Fribourg / Göttingen: Academic Press / Vandenhoeck Ruprecht. ORBIS BIBLICUS ET ORIENTALIS, Series Archaeologica 27 Published on behalf of the BIBLE+ORIENT Foundation in co-operation with the Department of Biblical Studies, University of Fribourg (Switzerland), the Egyptological lnstitute, University of Basel, the Institute of Archaeology, Near Eastern section, University of Berne, the Department of Religious Studies, University of Zurich, and the Swiss Society for Ancient Near Eastern Studies by Susanne Bickel, Othmar Keel and Christoph Uehlinger The author Daphna Ben-Tor is the curator of Egyptian Archaeology. at The lsrael Museum, Jerusalem. Born in Jerusalem, she received a B.A. in Archaeology, M.A. and Ph.D. in Egyptology from The Hebrew University of Jerusalem. Her scholarly work focuses on scarabs of the first l'ralf of the second millennium BCE, mainly with regard to Egyptian/Levanti ne relations. Among her publications: <The Relations between Egypt and Palestiñe in the Middle Kingdom as Reflected by Contemporary Canaanite Scarabs>>, Israel Exploration lournal 47 (1997) 162-189; <The Absolute Date of the Montet Jar Scarabso, in Ancient Egyptian and Mediterranean Studies in Memory of W. A. Ward, ed. L. H. Lesko, Providence, Rl, 1998, 1-17; <Egyptian-Levantine Relations and Chronology in the Middle Bronze Age: Scarab Research>, in The Synchronisation of Civilisations in the Eastern Mediterranean in the Second Millennium B.C. Il, ed. M. Bietak, Vienna, 2003, 239-247. Her publications also include exhibition catalogues of the lsrael Museum Orbis B¡ blicus et Orienta l¡ S 27 Series Archaeologica Daphna Ben-Tor S carab S Chronology, an d lntercon nections Egypt and Palestine in the Second lntermediate Period I Academic Press Fribou r8 Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht Cöttingen Gedruckt mit Unterstützung des Spezialforschungsbereichs SCIEM 2000 ,,Die Synchronisierung der Hochkulturen im östlichen Mittelmeerraum im 2. Jahrtausend v. Chr." der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften beim X'onds zur X'örderung der Wissenschaftlichen X'orschung SCIEM 2000 Special R,esearch Programme SCIEM 2000 "The Synchronisation of Civilisations in the Eastern Mediteranean in the Second Millennium 8.C." of the Austrian Academy of Sciences at the Austrian Science X'und Publication subsidized by the Swiss Academy of Humanities and Social Sciences and the Jean Nordmann Foundation Fribourg lnternet general catalogue: Academic Press Fríbourg: www.paulusedition.ch Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, Cöttingen: www.v-r.de Camera-ready text submitted by the author @ 2007 by Academic Press Fribourg, Fribourg Switzerland Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht Cöttingen ISBN: 978-3-7278-1593-5 Academic Press Fribourg ISB N : 9 78-3 - 525 -53204-1 Vanden hoeck & Ruprecht ISSN 101 5-1 850 (Orb. biblicus orient.) Table of Contents Acknowledgements ........................................................................................................................................... xiii Maps .................................................................................................................................................................. xiv Principal Middle Kingdom and Second Intermediate Period sites in Egypt and Nubia yielding scarabs and seal impressions .............................................................................................................................................. xiv Principal Middle Bronze Age sites in the Levant yielding scarabs ................................................................ xv Introduction ...................................................................................................................................................... 1 The Stylistic and Chronological Typologies................................................................................................... 3 CHAPTER I TYPOLOGY OF SCARABS FOUND IN LATE MIDDLE KINGDOM CONTEXTS IN EGYPT AND NUBIA............... 5 Introduction ....................................................................................................................................................... Table of main sites.............................................................................................................................................. 8 §IA. Typology of Designs ................................................................................................................................. 10 §IA 1. Design class 1 – Linear patterns ............................................................................................................ 10 §IA 1a. Design class 1E – Floral motifs............................................................................................................. 10 §IA 2. Design Class 2 – Scrolls and spirals...................................................................................................... 12 §IA 2a. Design class 2A – Scrolls and spirals, unlinked ....................................................................... 13 §IA 2b. Design class 2B – Scroll and spirals, interlocking ................................................................... 13 §IA 3. Design class 3 – Egyptian signs and symbols ....................................................................................... 14 §IA 3a. Design class 3A - Monograms and varia.................................................................................. 15 §IA 3a1. Design class 3A1 - Sign of union (smæ-tæwy)............................................................. 15 §IA 3a2. Design class 3A2 – nbty design.................................................................................. 16 §IA 3a3. Design class 3A3 – Varia .......................................................................................... 16 §IA 3a4. Class 3A4 – Horus hawk with nïr and other signs.................................................... 17 §IA 3b. Design class 3B – Symmetric patterns ..................................................................................... 17 §IA 3b1. Design class 3B1 – Cobras........................................................................................ 17 §IA 3b2. Design class 3B2 – King of Upper and Lower Egypt (nsw-bít) ................................. 18 §IA 3b3. Design class 3B3 – Red crowns ................................................................................ 18 §IA 3b4. Design class 3B4 – Horus eyes (wÿæt)....................................................................... 19 §IA 3b5. Design class 3B5 – Sedge plants (swt)....................................................................... 19 §IA 3b6. Design class 3B6 – Gold sign (nbw) in longitudinal setting ...................................... 19 §IA 3b7. Design class 3B7 – Forepart of lion (œæt).................................................................. 20 §IA 3c. Design class 3C – Formulae ..................................................................................................... 20 §IA 3d. Design class 3D – Cartouches .................................................................................................. 21 §IA 3e. Design class 3E – Panels .......................................................................................................... 22 §IA 4. Design class 4 – Concentric circles ......................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Los Dos Cuerpos Del Rey: Cosmos Y Política De La Monarquía Egipcia* the Two Bodies of the King: Cosmos and Politics of the Egyptian Monarchy
    Los dos cuerpos del rey: cosmos y política de la monarquía egipcia* The Two Bodies of the King: Cosmos and Politics of the Egyptian Monarchy Antonio J. Morales Freie Universität Berlin Resumen Abstract El estudio de la evidencia textual, The analysis of the textual, icono- iconográfica y arqueológica del antiguo graphic and archaeological evidence in Egipto refleja la geminación de la perso- ancient Egypt reveals the gemination na del monarca. Esta doble naturaleza of the royal persona. This dual nature explica la multiplicidad de imágenes del explains the multiplicity of images of rey en las fuentes oficiales y populares the king in official and popular sources, y justifica la ambigüedad de nuestras and justifies the vagueness of our inter- interpretaciones. En este artículo exa- pretations. In this work I examine the mino el proceso adaptativo de la mo- adaptative process of Egyptian kings- narquía egipcia a diversas condiciones hip to diverse political, social and reli- * El presente artículo es una versión extensa de la conferencia impartida en el marco del Seminario de Historia Antigua «Dioses, héroes y hombres: La divinización del poder en las sociedades antiguas», que tuvo lugar en la Universidad de Sevilla en noviembre de 2013. Mi agradecimiento a Fernando Lozano Gómez, Pedro Giménez de Aragón y Carmen Alarcón Hernández por su amable invitación al seminario y su excelente organización. Agradezco también a Juan Carlos Moreno García (Université Paris-Sorbon- ne) la lectura del borrador de este trabajo y sus comentarios; a José Manuel Galán Allue (CSIC-CCHS, Madrid) por permitirme leer secciones del borrador de su libro (con B.M.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cradle of Pyramids.Wps
    The cradle of pyramids in satellite images Amelia Carolina Sparavigna Dipartimento di Fisica, Politecnico di Torino, Torino, Italy We propose the use of image processing to enhance the Google Maps of some archaeological areas of Egypt. In particular we analyse that place which is considered the cradle of pyramids, where it was announced the discovery of a new pyramid by means of an infrared remote sensing. Saqqara and Dahshur are burial places of the ancient Egypt. Saqqara was the necropolis of Memphis, the ancient capital of the Lower Egypt. This place has many pyramids, including the well-known step pyramid of Djoser, and several mastabas. As told in Wikipedia, 16 Egyptian kings built pyramids there and the high officials added their tombs during the entire pharaonic period [1]. The necropolis remained an important complex for non-royal burials and cult ceremonies till the Roman times. Dahshur is another royal necropolis located in the desert on the west bank of the Nile [2]. The place is well-known for several pyramids, two of which are among the oldest and best preserved in Egypt. Therefore this site can be properly considered as the cradle of Egyptian pyramids [3]. Figure 1 shows the Djoser pyramid and the Great Enclosure at Saqqara. The two images have been obtained from Google Maps after an image processing with two programs, AstroFracTool, based on the calculus of the fractional gradient, and the wavelet filtering of Iris, as discussed in Ref.4. The reader can compare the images with the original Google Maps, using the coordinates given in the figure [5].
    [Show full text]
  • Scarabs and Cylinders with Names
    BRITISH SCHOOL OF ARCHAEOLOGY IN EGYPT AND EGYPTIAN RESEARCH ACCOUNT TWENTY-FIRST YEAR, 1915 SCARABS AND CYLINDERS WITH NAMES ILLUSTRATED BY THE EGYPTIAN COLLECTION IN UNIVERSITY COLLEGE, LONDON BY W. M. FLINDERS PETRIE HON. D.C.L., LL.D., L1TT.D.. F.R.S., F.B.A., HON. F.S.A. (SCOT.), A.R.I.B.A. MEMBER OF THE ROYAL IRISH ACADEMY MEMBER OF THE ITALIAN SOCIETY OF ANTHROPOLOGY MEMBER OF THE ROMAN SOCIETY OF ANTHROPOLOGY MEMBER OF THE SOCIETY OF NORTHERN ANTIQUARIES MEMBER OF THE AMERICAN PIIILOSOPHICAL SOCIETY BDWARDS PROFESSOR OF EGYPTOLOGY, UNIVERSITY OF LONDON LONDON SCHOOL OF ARCHAEOLOGY IN EGYPT UNIVERSITY COLLEGE, GOWER STREET, W.C. AND CONSTABLE (G CO. LTD., 10 ORANGE STREET, LEICESTER SQUARE AND BERNARD QUARITCH, 11 GRAFTON STREET, NEW BOND STREET '917 PRINTED BY =*=ELL, WATSON AND VINEY, L~., LONDON AND AYLESBURY. BRITISH SCHOOL OF ARCHAEOLOGY IN EGYPT AND EGYPTIAN RESEARCH ACCOUNT GENERAL COMMITTEE (*Bxecutiz~z ibfenibsus) Hon. JOHN ABERCROMBY Prof. PERCYGARDNCR *J. G. MILNE WALTERRALLY Rt. Hon. Sir G. T. GOLDIE KOBERTMOND HENRYBALFOUR Prof. GOWLAND Prof. MONTAGUE Rev. Dr. T. G. BONNEY Mrs. J. R. GREEN WALTERMORRISON Prof. R. C. BOSANQUET Rt. Hon. F.-M. LORDGRENFELL *Miss M. A. MURRAY Rt. Hon. VISCOIJNT BRYCEOF Mrs. F. LL. GRIFFITH Prof. P. E. NEWBERRY DECHMONT Dr. A. C. HADDON His Grace the DUKE OF Dr. R. M. BURROWS Dr. JESSE HAWORTH NORTHUMBERLAND. "Prof. J. B. BURY(Cliairr~~an) Rev. Dr. A. C. HEADLAM F. W. PERCIVAL *SOMERSCLARKE D. G. HOGARTH Dr. PINCHES EowARn CLODD Sir H. H. HOWORTH Dr. G. W. PROTHERO Prof. BOYDDAWKINS Baron A.
    [Show full text]
  • Ancient Egyptian Chronology.Pdf
    Ancient Egyptian Chronology HANDBOOK OF ORIENTAL STUDIES SECTION ONE THE NEAR AND MIDDLE EAST Ancient Near East Editor-in-Chief W. H. van Soldt Editors G. Beckman • C. Leitz • B. A. Levine P. Michalowski • P. Miglus Middle East R. S. O’Fahey • C. H. M. Versteegh VOLUME EIGHTY-THREE Ancient Egyptian Chronology Edited by Erik Hornung, Rolf Krauss, and David A. Warburton BRILL LEIDEN • BOSTON 2006 This book is printed on acid-free paper. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Ancient Egyptian chronology / edited by Erik Hornung, Rolf Krauss, and David A. Warburton; with the assistance of Marianne Eaton-Krauss. p. cm. — (Handbook of Oriental studies. Section 1, The Near and Middle East ; v. 83) Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN-13: 978-90-04-11385-5 ISBN-10: 90-04-11385-1 1. Egypt—History—To 332 B.C.—Chronology. 2. Chronology, Egyptian. 3. Egypt—Antiquities. I. Hornung, Erik. II. Krauss, Rolf. III. Warburton, David. IV. Eaton-Krauss, Marianne. DT83.A6564 2006 932.002'02—dc22 2006049915 ISSN 0169-9423 ISBN-10 90 04 11385 1 ISBN-13 978 90 04 11385 5 © Copyright 2006 by Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, The Netherlands. Koninklijke Brill NV incorporates the imprints Brill, Hotei Publishing, IDC Publishers, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, and VSP. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, translated, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without prior written permission from the publisher. Authorization to photocopy items for internal or personal use is granted by Brill provided that the appropriate fees are paid directly to The Copyright Clearance Center, 222 Rosewood Drive, Suite 910, Danvers, MA 01923, USA.
    [Show full text]
  • Reading G Uide
    1 Reading Guide Introduction Pharaonic Lives (most items are on map on page 10) Bodies of Water Major Regions Royal Cities Gulf of Suez Faiyum Oasis Akhetaten Sea The Levant Alexandria Nile River Libya Avaris Nile cataracts* Lower Egypt Giza Nile Delta Nubia Herakleopolis Magna Red Sea Palestine Hierakonpolis Punt Kerma *Cataracts shown as lines Sinai Memphis across Nile River Syria Sais Upper Egypt Tanis Thebes 2 Chapter 1 Pharaonic Kingship: Evolution & Ideology Myths Time Periods Significant Artifacts Predynastic Origins of Kingship: Naqada Naqada I The Narmer Palette Period Naqada II The Scorpion Macehead Writing History of Maqada III Pharaohs Old Kingdom Significant Buildings Ideology & Insignia of Middle Kingdom Kingship New Kingdom Tombs at Abydos King’s Divinity Mythology Royal Insignia Royal Names & Titles The Book of the Heavenly Atef Crown The Birth Name Cow Blue Crown (Khepresh) The Golden Horus Name The Contending of Horus Diadem (Seshed) The Horus Name & Seth Double Crown (Pa- The Nesu-Bity Name Death & Resurrection of Sekhemty) The Two Ladies Name Osiris Nemes Headdress Red Crown (Desheret) Hem Deities White Crown (Hedjet) Per-aa (The Great House) The Son of Re Horus Bull’s tail Isis Crook Osiris False beard Maat Flail Nut Rearing cobra (uraeus) Re Seth Vocabulary Divine Forces demi-god heka (divine magic) Good God (netjer netjer) hu (divine utterance) Great God (netjer aa) isfet (chaos) ka-spirit (divine energy) maat (divine order) Other Topics Ramesses II making sia (Divine knowledge) an offering to Ra Kings’ power
    [Show full text]
  • Journal of Ancient Egyptian Interconnections
    Journal of Ancient Egyptian Interconnections Applying a Multi- Analytical Approach to the Investigation of Ancient Egyptian Influence in Nubian Communities: The Socio- Cultural Implications of Chemical Variation in Ceramic Styles Julia Carrano Department of Anthropology, University of California— Santa Barbara Stuart T. Smith Department of Anthropology, University of California— Santa Barbara George Herbst Department of Anthropology, University of California— Santa Barbara Gary H. Girty Department of Geological Sciences, San Diego State University Carl J. Carrano Department of Chemistry, San Diego State University Jeffrey R. Ferguson Archaeometry Laboratory, Research Reactor Center, University of Missouri Abstract is article reviews published archaeological research that explores the potential of combined chemical and petrographic analyses to distin - guish manufacturing methods of ceramics made om Nile river silt. e methodology was initially applied to distinguish the production methods of Egyptian and Nubian- style vessels found in New Kingdom and Napatan Period Egyptian colonial centers in Upper Nubia. Conducted in the context of ongoing excavations and surveys at the third cataract, ceramic characterization can be used to explore the dynamic role pottery production may have played in Egyptian efforts to integrate with or alter native Nubian culture. Results reveal that, despite overall similar geochemistry, x-ray fluorescence (XRF), instrumental neutron activation analysis (INAA), and petrography can dis - tinguish Egyptian and Nubian-
    [Show full text]
  • Pharaohs in Egypt Fathi Habashi
    Laval University From the SelectedWorks of Fathi Habashi July, 2019 Pharaohs in Egypt Fathi Habashi Available at: https://works.bepress.com/fathi_habashi/416/ Pharaohs of Egypt Introduction Pharaohs were the mighty political and religious leaders who reigned over ancient Egypt for more than 3,000 years. Also known as the god-kings of ancient Egypt, made the laws, and owned all the land. Warfare was an important part of their rule. In accordance to their status as gods on earth, the Pharaohs built monuments and temples in honor of themselves and the gods of the land. Egypt was conquered by the Kingdom of Kush in 656 BC, whose rulers adopted the pharaonic titles. Following the Kushite conquest, Egypt would first see another period of independent native rule before being conquered by the Persian Empire, whose rulers also adopted the title of Pharaoh. Persian rule over Egypt came to an end through the conquests of Alexander the Great in 332 BC, after which it was ruled by the Hellenic Pharaohs of the Ptolemaic Dynasty. They also built temples such as the one at Edfu and Dendara. Their rule, and the independence of Egypt, came to an end when Egypt became a province of Rome in 30 BC. The Pharaohs who ruled Egypt are large in number - - here is a selection. Narmer King Narmer is believed to be the same person as Menes around 3100 BC. He unified Upper and Lower Egypt and combined the crown of Lower Egypt with that of Upper Egypt. Narmer or Mena with the crown of Lower Egypt The crown of Lower Egypt Narmer combined crown of Upper and Lower Egypt Djeser Djeser of the third dynasty around 2670 BC commissioned the first Step Pyramid in Saqqara created by chief architect and scribe Imhotep.
    [Show full text]
  • Hyksos, Egipcios, Nubios: Algunas Consideraciones Sobre El I1 Pe~Odointermedio Y La Convivencia Entre Los Distintos Grupos Etnicos
    HYKSOS, EGIPCIOS, NUBIOS: ALGUNAS CONSIDERACIONES SOBRE EL I1 PE~ODOINTERMEDIO Y LA CONVIVENCIA ENTRE LOS DISTINTOS GRUPOS ETNICOS Inmaculada Vivas SBinz Universidad de AlcalB de Henares ABSTRACT This article reviews some questions of the political and social history of the the Second Intermediate Period. The first part is based on recent discussion about the terminology related to the period, and the convenience or unconvenience of using certain terms in future investigations. The second part concerns the relationships among the dlflerent ethnic groups living in Egypt at that time, and the process of acculturation of the Hyksos in Egypt. An interesting hypotheses about king Nehesy is analysed, which proposes the existence of a dynastic marriage between a Nubian queen and a king of the XIVth Dynasty, both being the suppoused parents of Nehesy. I reject this hypotheses on the basis of archaedogical and epigraphical sources. The true origin of Nehesy remains a moot point, being still d~ficultto explain why this king had a name meaning "the Nubian". -Los estudios sobre el I1 Periodo Intermedio egipcio se remontan a1 siglo pasado', pero es desde hace apenas unas dCcadas cuando se ha sentido la necesidad de definir ese tCrmino. Los primeros trabajos sobre el tema eran breves anilisis sobre el final del Reino Medio y la llegada de 10s hyksos, sobre Cstos y su relaci6n con Israel, o la posible ubicaci6n de Avaris y el proceso de expulsi6n de 10s hyksos. Todos estos estudios son importantes para nuestras investigaciones pero muchas veces se basan s610 en fuentes arqueol6gicas procedentes de Siria-Palestina de las cuales se extrapolaban datos para la situaci6n de Egipto.
    [Show full text]
  • Who's Who in Ancient Egypt
    Who’s Who IN ANCIENT EGYPT Available from Routledge worldwide: Who’s Who in Ancient Egypt Michael Rice Who’s Who in the Ancient Near East Gwendolyn Leick Who’s Who in Classical Mythology Michael Grant and John Hazel Who’s Who in World Politics Alan Palmer Who’s Who in Dickens Donald Hawes Who’s Who in Jewish History Joan Comay, new edition revised by Lavinia Cohn-Sherbok Who’s Who in Military History John Keegan and Andrew Wheatcroft Who’s Who in Nazi Germany Robert S.Wistrich Who’s Who in the New Testament Ronald Brownrigg Who’s Who in Non-Classical Mythology Egerton Sykes, new edition revised by Alan Kendall Who’s Who in the Old Testament Joan Comay Who’s Who in Russia since 1900 Martin McCauley Who’s Who in Shakespeare Peter Quennell and Hamish Johnson Who’s Who in World War Two Edited by John Keegan Who’s Who IN ANCIENT EGYPT Michael Rice 0 London and New York First published 1999 by Routledge 11 New Fetter Lane, London EC4P 4EE Simultaneously published in the USA and Canada by Routledge 29 West 35th Street, New York, NY 10001 Routledge is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group This edition published in the Taylor & Francis e-Library, 2004. © 1999 Michael Rice The right of Michael Rice to be identified as the Author of this Work has been asserted by him in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reprinted or reproduced or utilised in any form or by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including photocopying and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publishers.
    [Show full text]
  • Egypt and Africa Presentation.Pdf
    Egypt and Africa Map of the Second Cataract showing fortress area Different plan types of Nubian fortresses: Cataract fortresses Plains fortresses Fortress at Buhen: Plains Fortress Defensive Characteristics Askut: Cataract Fort Middle Kingdom institutions as shown by seal impressions First Semna Stela of Senwosret III Southern boundary, made in the year 8, under the majesty of the King of Upper and Lower Egypt, Khakaure Senwosret III who is given life forever and ever; in order to prevent that any Nubian should cross it, by water or by land, with a ship or with any herds of the Nubians, except a Nubian who shall come to do trading in Iqen (Mirgissa) or with a commission. Every good thing shall be done with them, but without allowing a ship of the Nubians to pass by Heh, going downstream, forever. Boundary Stela of Senwosret III from Semna (a duplicate found at Uronarti) “…I have made my boundary further south than my fathers, I have added to what was bequeathed me. I am a king who speaks and acts, What my heart plans is done by my arm… Attack is valor, retreat is cowardice, A coward is he who is driven from his border. Since the Nubian listens to the word of mouth, To answer him is to make him retreat. Attack him, he will turn his back, Retreat, he will start attacking. They are not people one respects, They are wretches, craven-hearted… As for any son of mine who shall maintain this border which my majesty has made, he is my son, born to my majesty.
    [Show full text]
  • 3 the Kingdom of Kush. Urban Defences and Military Installations
    In : N. Crummy (ed.), Image, Craft and the Classical World. Essays in honour of Donald Bailey and Catherine Johns (Monogr. Instrumentum 29), Montagnac 2005, p. 39-54. 3 The Kingdom of Kush. Urban defences and military installations by Derek A. Welsby1 When the Romans took control of Egypt in 30 BC they with the rise of Aksum and the possible invasion of the came in direct contact on their southern frontier with the region around Meroe by the army of Aezanes (cf. Behrens Kingdom of Kush, the longest established state of any that 1986; Török 1997a, 483-4). they faced. Kush had been a major power at least since the Perhaps of more long-term concern were the low level mid 8th century BC at a time when Rome itself consisted raids mounted by the desert tribes on the fringes of the of little more than a group of huts on the Palatine. In the Nile Valley2. At least one of these incursions, during the th later 8 century BC the Kings of Kush ruled an empire reign of King Nastasen in the later 4th century BC, stretching from Central Sudan to the borders of Palestine resulted in the looting of a temple at Kawa in the Dongola controlling Egypt as pharaohs of what became known as Reach and earlier Meroe itself, the main political centre, th the 25 Dynasty. Forced to withdraw from Egypt in the seems to have been under threat. face of Assyrian aggression by the mid 7th century BC, they retreated south of the First Cataract of the Nile where they maintained control of the river valley far upstream of Urban defences the confluence of the White and Blue Niles at modern-day Khartoum, into the 4th century AD (Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • Section 5 the Cultures of Nubia
    Chapter 3 Ancient Egypt and Nubia Objectives Examine the relationship between Nubia and Egypt. Learn about the Nubian kingdoms centered in Kerma, Napata, and Meroe. Key Terms ore – a mineral or a combination of minerals mined for the production of metals Lower Nubia – the region of ancient Nubia between the first and second Nile cataracts Upper Nubia – the region of ancient Nubia between the second and sixth Nile cataracts artisan – a worker who is skilled in crafting goods by hand In 690 B.C., Taharka, the greatest ruler of his dynasty, was crowned king of both Nubia and Egypt. Taharka’s mother journeyed 1200 miles from Nubia to Memphis to see his coronation. Nubia and Egypt Archaeologists have found pottery, weapons, and jewelry at Nubian burial sites dating back to 6000 B.C. There was also evidence of trading. Land of the Bow The region of Nubia was located south of ancient Egypt, beyond the first cataract of the Nile River. For most of their long history, Nubia and Egypt were peaceful, friendly neighbors. The Egyptians called Nubia “Ta Sety”, the land of the bow. The Nubian archers were so skilled that the Egyptians hired them for their armies. Valuable Resources Egypt valued Nubia for its rich mineral resources such as gold, copper, and iron ore. Because of its location, Nubia became a bridge for goods traveling between central Africa and Egypt. Powerful kingdoms rose in Upper Nubia, the region between the second and sixth Nile cataracts, rivaling Egypt for control of land. The most powerful of these kingdoms were in the cities of Kerma, Napata, and Meroe, ruled by Kushites, people who lived in southern Nubia.
    [Show full text]