DOCSLIB.ORG

The Star of Bethlehem and the Comet of Comet of AD 66

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Star of Bethlehem and the Comet of Comet of AD 66 The Star of Bethlehem and the comet of AD 66 R. M. Jenkins The search for an explanation of the Star of Bethlehem is almost as old as the story itself. To date there is no generally accepted answer. This paper briefly reviews the possible explanations and concludes that it was almost certainly a fictional story perhaps inspired by the appearance of Comet Halley in AD 66. Introduction The full text as presented in the authorised King James Version of the Bible2 is as follows: This paper presents the results of a study to establish an Chapter 2 explanation of what the Star of Bethlehem may have been. 1 Now when Jesus was born in Bethlehem of Judæa in the days of It is important for any such study to establish the a priori Herod the king, behold, there came wise men from the east to assumptions. One of the most important is to take a stance Jerusalem, on the subject of astrology. Over the centuries the Jewish 2 Saying, Where is he that is born king of the Jews? For we have and Christian hierarchies have taken a fairly ambivalent po- seen his star in the east, and we have come to worship him. sition on the question of the authenticity or otherwise of 3 When Herod the king had heard these things, he was troubled, astrological predictions, and many previous studies con- and all Jerusalem with him. cerning the star have also tended to fudge the issue. 4 And when he had gathered all the chief priests and scribes of the Well before Christian times careful observation of the night people together he demanded of them where Christ should be born. sky led to the establishment of useful calendars. These al- 5 And they said unto him, In Bethlehem of Judæa: for thus it is lowed basic predictions to be made that aided agriculture and written by the prophet. helped communities prepare for the likely weather and condi- 6 And thou Bethlehem in the land of Juda, art not the least among tions ahead. One such prediction was that the heliacal rising the princes of Juda: for out of thee shall come a Governor, that of the star Sirius signalled the annual flooding of the Nile.1 shall rule my people Israel. It is a human weakness to try to extend this approach to 7 Then Herod, when he had privily called the wise men, inquired other events where there is no causal relationship. This must of them diligently what time the star appeared. have been particularly tempting for ancient non-scientifi- 8 And he sent them to Bethlehem, and said, Go and search dili- cally based communities in which superstitions were rife. gently for the young child; and when ye have found him, bring However, it is a fundamental assumption of this study that me word again, that I may come and worship him also. the configuration of the heavenly bodies can only affect 9 When they had heard the king, they departed; and, lo the star, happenings on Earth when there is a true causal reason. which they saw in the east, went before them, till it came and This rules out the validity of almost all astrology. Certain stood over where the young child was. astrological predictions can of course become self-fulfilling 10 When they saw the star, they rejoiced with exceeding great joy. prophecies such as the death of a king or the loss of a battle, 11 And when they were come into the house, they saw the young or even the claimed birth of a Messiah. child with Mary his mother, and fell down, and worshipped Another starting assumption is that the appearance of him: and when they had opened their treasures, they presented unto him gifts; gold, and frankincense, and myrrh. the star was not a miracle. If it was then the story is not 12 And being warned of God in a dream that they should not return amenable to scientific analysis. to Herod, they departed into their own country another way. These basic assumptions in themselves rule out the story 13 And when they had departed, behold, the angel of the Lord of the Magi and the star as a factual account, but they do not appeareth to Joseph in a dream, saying, Arise, and take the rule out the possibility of a star inspiring the story. young child and his mother, and flee into Egypt, and be thou there until I bring thee word: for Herod will seek the young child to destroy him. 14 When he arose, he took the young child and his mother by night, The primary source and departed into Egypt: 15 And was there until the death of Herod: that it might be fulfilled which was spoken of the Lord by the prophet, saying, Out of Any search for an explanation of the Star of Bethlehem must Egypt have I called my son. start with the Gospel according to St Matthew, as this is the 16 Then Herod, when he saw that he was mocked of the wise men, sole source of the original story. was exceeding wroth, and sent forth, and slew all the children 336 J. Br. Astron. Assoc. 114, 6, 2004 Jenkins: The Star of Bethlehem and the comet of AD 66 that were in Bethlehem, and in all the coasts thereof, from two Ignatius, the second Bishop of Antioch in Syria in about AD years old and under, according to the time which he had dili- 107, wrote ‘a star shone forth in heaven above all the other gently inquired of the wise men. stars, the light of which was inexpressible, while its novelty In the New Revised Standard Version of the Bible3 that claims struck men with astonishment. And all the rest of the stars, to be based on the translation of the best available manu- with the Sun and Moon, formed a chorus to this star, and its scripts and recent advances in biblical, archeological and light was exceedingly great above them all’. linguistic scholarship, ‘star in the east’ becomes ‘star at its Careful analysis of the text of St Matthew’s Gospel re- rising’ and ‘went before them, till it came and stood over’ veals a number of important points that are sometimes mis- becomes ‘ahead of them went the star until it stopped over’. quoted or misinterpreted. For example: The phrase ‘star in the east’ is usually interpreted as ‘star at – It is not stated either explicitly or implicitly that the Magi its heliacal rising’. The literal translation from the Greek is followed the star to Jerusalem. Of course if they had followed ‘star in the first rays of dawn’. the star and they came from the east the star would have had to In the New International Version4 ‘wise men’ becomes have been in the west. ‘Magi’ which is the Greek original. In the New English Bi- – The number of Magi is not specified. 5 ble ‘wise men’ becomes ‘astrologers’ and in another ver- – There is no reference to their being kings. 6 sion ‘scholars who were students of the stars’. Elsewhere – The text does not say that Herod had not seen the star; it they have been described as scholarly envoys; magicians; merely says he inquired when it first appeared. sorcerers; dabblers in the black arts; fortune tellers; and – There is nothing that implies how bright the star was other than priestly augurers, a caste who were adept at various forms of it was obviously a naked eye object. secret lore who could interpret dreams.7,8 According to a contemporary of Jesus, Philo of Alexan- dria, there existed astrologers who were the more scientific Magi, and other Magi who were charlatans and magicians − the ‘good and the bad’ Magi.7 Matthew was probably Important dates referring to the former type. They were thought to be Babylonian Jews who were familiar with the beliefs of Zo- Date of the Nativity roastrianism. They believed in good and evil, and that good would triumph, resurrecting the dead and creating para- Estimates for the date of Christ’s birth have ranged from at dise on earth. They lived in the expectation of the coming least 12 BC to AD 9.13 Some estimates have a much sounder of the Messiah. basis than others. On the other hand Pliny was more familiar with the lat- It is now accepted, but not by everyone,14 that Christ was ter type of Magi and was very much against them. In his probably born between 7 and 5 BC. Natural History he states ‘I have often indeed refuted the fraudulent lies of the Magi.’9 This negative view also seems to be the interpretation in other parts of the Bible Date of St Matthew’s Gospel where Magi feature. The Gospel according to St Luke also tells the tale of Due to the dependence of St Matthew’s gospel on St Mark’s, the Nativity,10 but Luke does not mention the star, the it could not have been written before AD 70.15 In addition as Magi or Herod and there was no slaughter of the inno- it was referred to by Ignatius of Antioch in his letters written cents. Instead there were the swaddling clothes, the man- at the start of the second century, it must have been written ger and the shepherds. In fact the star does not appear by AD 100.16 It is also claimed that it was known to Clement anywhere else in the New Testament.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • ROMA SURRECTA: Portrait of a Counterinsurgent Power, 216 BC - AD 72
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons CUREJ - College Undergraduate Research Electronic Journal College of Arts and Sciences 5-2011 ROMA SURRECTA: Portrait of a Counterinsurgent Power, 216 BC - AD 72 Emerson T. Brooking University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/curej Part of the Ancient History, Greek and Roman through Late Antiquity Commons, Comparative Politics Commons, Military History Commons, and the Other Political Science Commons Recommended Citation Brooking, Emerson T., "ROMA SURRECTA: Portrait of a Counterinsurgent Power, 216 BC - AD 72" 01 May 2011. CUREJ: College Undergraduate Research Electronic Journal, University of Pennsylvania, https://repository.upenn.edu/curej/145. This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/curej/145 For more information, please contact [email protected]. ROMA SURRECTA: Portrait of a Counterinsurgent Power, 216 BC - AD 72 Abstract This study evaluates the military history and practice of the Roman Empire in the context of contemporary counterinsurgency theory. It purports that the majority of Rome’s security challenges fulfill the criteria of insurgency, and that Rome’s responses demonstrate counterinsurgency proficiency. These assertions are proven by means of an extensive investigation of the grand strategic, military, and cultural aspects of the Roman state. Fourteen instances of likely insurgency are identified and examined, permitting the application of broad theoretical precepts
    [Show full text]
  • Svensk Exegetisk 81 Årsbok
    SVENSK EXEGETISK 81 ÅRSBOK På uppdrag av Svenska exegetiska sällskapet utgiven av Göran Eidevall Uppsala 2016 Svenska exegetiska sällskapet c/o Teologiska institutionen Box 511, S-751 20 UPPSALA, Sverige www.exegetiskasallskapet.se Utgivare: Göran Eidevall ([email protected]) Redaktionssekreterare: Tobias Hägerland –2016 ([email protected]) David Willgren 2017– ([email protected]) Recensionsansvarig: Rosmari Lillas-Schuil ([email protected]) Redaktionskommitté: Göran Eidevall ([email protected]) Rikard Roitto ([email protected]) Blaåenka Scheuer ([email protected]) Cecilia Wassén ([email protected]) Prenumerationspriser: Sverige: SEK 200 (studenter SEK 100) Övriga världen: SEK 300 Frakt tillkommer med SEK 50. För medlemmar i SES är frakten kostnadsfri. SEÅ beställs hos Svenska exegetiska sällskapet via hemsidan eller postadress ovan, eller hos Bokrondellen (www.bokrondellen.se). Anvisningar för medverkande åter- finns på hemsidan eller erhålls från redaktionssekreteraren. Manusstopp är 1 mars. Tidskriften är indexerad i Libris databas (www.kb.se/libris/). SEÅ may be ordered from Svenska exegetiska sällskapet either through the homepage or at the postal address above. Instructions for contributors are found on the homep- age or may be requested from the editorial secretary (david.willgren@ altutbildning.se). This periodical is indexed in the ATLA Religion Database®, published by the Ameri- can Theological Library Association, 300 S. Wacker Dr., Suite 2100, Chicago, IL 60606; E-mail: [email protected]; WWW: https://www.atla.com/. Omslagsbild: Odysseus och sirenerna (attisk vas, ca 480–470 f.Kr., British Museum) Bildbearbetning: Marcus Lecaros © SEÅ och respektive författare ISSN 1100-2298 Uppsala 2016 Tryck: Bulls Graphics, Halmstad Innehåll Exegetiska dagen 2015/Exegetical Day 2015 Bruce Louden Agamemnon and the Hebrew Bible ......................
    [Show full text]
  • Hadrian's Second Jewish Revolt: Political Or Religious
    1 Hadrian’s Second Jewish Revolt: Political or Religious? By Ronnie Leslie Western Oregon University Hst. 499: Senior Seminar Professor Kimberly Jensen Spring 2005 Primary Thesis Advisor: Dr. Benedict Lowe Secondary Thesis Adviser: Dr. Narasingha Sil 2 I No matter how broad the gathering of evidence, there is a certain degree of opinion involved in deciding what to include in Hadrian’s Second Jewish revolt. Our knowledge of the reign of Hadrian is problematic due to the lack of evidence. Not only are contemporary documents relatively rare, but our knowledge of specific events of Hadrian’s reign is also limited. However, there are certain aspects of Hadrian’s reign that have stirred up numerous myths and truths which have been debated throughout history. Foremost amongst these are Hadrian’s meticulous Hellenistic program which reorganized certain cities of the Roman Empire particularly the cities of the East, and his major structural and social reforms forced on the Jews leading to the Jewish revolt of AD 132- 135 characterized his rule. His rule is characterized as himself being his own man in administration of the Roman Empire. Therefore, was Hadrian’s political ideology toward the empire the cause of the Second Jewish revolt, or was it his religious ideology that forced him to belief that the Jews were inferior by enforce major reforms, and policy in Judaea. The second Jewish uprising against Rome is only comparable in its significance and its far-reaching consequences with the first uprising of A.D. 66, although there is one essential difference to this initial revolt, the source material on which we must rely on in 1 order to reconstruct the events is inferior to that of the earlier Jewish war.
    [Show full text]
  • The Jewish Revolts Against Rome, Ad 66-135
    The Jewish Revolts Against Rome, A.D. 66–135 This page intentionally left blank The Jewish Revolts Against Rome, A.D. 66–135 A Military Analysis JAMES J. BLOOM McFarland & Company, Inc., Publishers Jefferson, North Carolina, and London LIBRARY OF CONGRESS CATALOGUING-IN-PUBLICATION DATA Bloom, James J., 1939– The Jewish revolts against Rome, A.D.66–135: a military analysis / James J. Bloom p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-0-7864-4479-3 softcover : 50# alkaline paper 1. Jews—History, Military. 2. Rome—History, Military. 3. Jews—History—Rebellion, 66–73. 4. Jews—History—Bar Kokhba Rebellion, 132–135. 5. Josephus, Flavius. I. Title. DS111.6.B56 2010 933'.05—dc22 2010013727 British Library cataloguing data are available ©2010 James J. Bloom. All rights reserved No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying or recording, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Front cover: Marble relief of Roman Emperor Titus Flavius Vespasianus, AD 9-79, Sevilla, Spain (Art Archive/Gianni Dagli Orti); background ©20¡0 Shutterstock Manufactured in the United States of America McFarland & Company, Inc., Publishers Box 611, Jefferson, North Carolina 28640 www.mcfarlandpub.com For Jake, Zach, Zoey, Charlie and Sammy, with the hope they will eventually read their grandpop’s efforts. This page intentionally left blank Contents Preface and Introduction 1 I. THE FIRST REVOLT, A.D. 66–74 1. The First Revolt: Causation and Inevitability 16 2. Foundation for the Roman Involvement in Judaean Affairs 23 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Roman Policy Towards the Jews: Expulsions from the City of Rome During the First Century C.E
    Roman Policy towards the Jews: Expulsions from the City of Rome during the First Century C.E. Author(s): Leonard Victor Rutgers Source: Classical Antiquity, Vol. 13, No. 1 (Apr., 1994), pp. 56-74 Published by: University of California Press Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/25011005 Accessed: 11/02/2009 11:43 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use. Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at http://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=ucal. Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed page of such transmission. JSTOR is a not-for-profit organization founded in 1995 to build trusted digital archives for scholarship. We work with the scholarly community to preserve their work and the materials they rely upon, and to build a common research platform that promotes the discovery and use of these resources. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. University of California Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Classical Antiquity. http://www.jstor.org LEONARD VICTOR RUTGERS Roman Policy towards the Jews: Expulsions from the City of Rome during the First Century c.
    [Show full text]
  • 1. the Flavian Triumph and the Arch of Titus: the Jewish God in Flavian Rome1
    1. The Flavian Triumph and the Arch of Titus: The Jewish God in Flavian Rome1 Introduction In 70 CE the Roman forces besieging Jerusalem gained control of the city and destroyed the Jewish temple.2 The emperor Vespasian (r. 69 CE – 79 CE) and his son Titus (r. 79 CE – 81 CE), who served as general at the siege, were awarded a joint triumph to celebrate the victory over the Jews in Judaea. Celebrated in 71 CE, the Flavian3 triumph is described by the Jewish historian, Josephus (37 CE – c. 100 CE), who may have been an eye witness to the procession. This same triumphal procession is depicted on a monument known as the Arch of Titus, located on the Via Sacra in Rome. It was probably dedicated around 81, early in the reign of Domitian (r. 81 CE – 96 CE), brother and heir to Titus.4 In this paper I investigate the ways that ritual and monument bring the Jewish god from the edge of the empire into the imperial capital, and how ritual and monument construct a Flavian dynastic identity. Ritual and Space: The Flavian Triumph A triumph is a ritual that celebrates a spectacular Roman victory. Awarded by a vote of the Senate to a general who had defeated an enemy army with an exceptionally large count of enemies killed, a the ritual of the triumph included special prayers, a procession, sacrifices to Jupiter Optimus Maximus (the highest god of the Roman pantheon) and sometimes the execution of captured enemy leaders.5 Triumphal processions were an important aspect of the creation and expression of Roman collective identity, celebrating the military might of the Roman people.
    [Show full text]
  • John L. Barton 1943 - 1988
    Vo/2, No.7 Numismatic Art of Antiquity JUL Y 1988 $1.25 Product of evolution Necessity played key role in Roman coin changes by John Barton Simultaneously, aes grave -- cast Although not geographically re­ bronze coins, circular and weighing as mote from the colonial Greek cities of much as 400 grams -- were made for southern Italy and Sicily. Rome was a Roman use in Campania. These are town of very primitive monetary virtually unique to central Italy; they standards as late as the early Third are true coins, inasmuch as they bear Century B.C .• when those cities and marks of value and were exchanged at towns had for generations been face value rather than by individual striking technically sophisticated, and weight. They seem to have circulated often aesthetically beautiful, coinages. in Rome proper, in contrast to the Before about 300 B.C. the only fonns silver being struck for Rome in of metallic currency used in Rome southern Italy, which was used within were cast bronze tools and imple­ those provinces, and for foreign trade. ments -- barter objects, rather than The Second Punic War virtually currency as such -- and the aes rude, bankrupted Rome, and toward the end unworked ingots of bronze exchanged of that war the Roman treasury was Rome, AE Quadrans by weight. Then a kind of transitional forced to debase the quadrigatus (the 289-245 BC proro-coinage, the aes signatum, made standard didrachm of those years, a brief appearance in the early Third which bore on its reverse an image of Century; this consisted of oblong cast Please turn to page XVI bronze ingots with designs in relief on each side.
    [Show full text]
  • A History of the Jewish War, AD 66–74 by Steve Mason. New York: Cambridge Univ
    2017-013 17 Feb. 2017 A History of the Jewish War, AD 66–74 by Steve Mason. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press, 2016. Pp. xii, 689. ISBN 978–0–521–85329–3. Review by Guy MacLean Rogers, Wellesley College ([email protected]). No other conflict in antiquity has so profoundly affected the adherents of the Abrahamic religions as 1 the war of Jews against Romans in 66–74 CE . Jews, Christians, and Muslims have debated its causes, course, and meaning ever since. The destruction of the Temple and much of Jerusalem in 70 is a defin- ing episode in their intertwined, often competing histories and eschatologies. Did regional tensions or some long-standing enmity between Jews and Romans cause the war? How exactly did the Romans plan to win the war and how much resistance did their legions encoun- ter? Did the future Roman emperor Titus destroy the Temple as a matter of policy or was it burned down by accident? Did Eleazar ben Yair and the sicarii (dagger-men) atop Masada really commit mass suicide/murder in spring 74? The answers to such questions must be based on a firm grasp of the ancient sources for the war. By far the most important of these is the monograph of the Jewish-Roman priest and military leader Titus Flavius Josephus (born Joseph ben Matityahu). Born in 37 or 38 ( Life 5) Josephus was descended on his father’s side from the first of the twenty- four courses or clans of Jewish priests; on his mother’s, from Asamonaeus, ancestor of many high priests and kings of the Jewish ethnos or nation ( Life 1–2).
    [Show full text]
  • Timeline Timeline 301
    T 300 Timeline Timeline 301 70— AD 73–74 The last of the Jewish rebels are besieged by the Romans in Emperor Vespasian (AD 69–79) the fortress of Masada. 75— Emperor Titus (AD 79–81) TIMELINE 80— AD 79 Volcano Vesuvius erupts, destroying Pompeii and nearby towns. Emperor Domitian (AD 81–96) AD 80 The Colosseum is completed in Rome. 85— Ruler of Rome Events in Roman history Events in the rest of the world 90— 95— 776 BC First Olympic Games, in Olympia, Greece. 753 BC Traditional date of the foundation of Rome. According to Emperor Nerva (AD 96–98) 750— Romulus (753–715 BC) legend, Romulus was the first ruler of Rome. 100— Emperor Trajan (AD 98–117) 700— King Numa Pompilius (715–673 BC) 753-509 BC Rome was ruled by seven legendary kings. AD 100 Londinium replaces Camulodunum as capital of Britannia. 105— King Tullus Hostilius (673–642 BC) 660 BC According to legend, Jimmu becomes the first 650— emperor of Japan. King Ancus Marcius (642–616 BC) 110— 600— King Lucius Tarquinius Priscus (616–579 BC) c.600 BC Construction of the Cloaca Maxima in Rome. AD 113 Trajan’s column, celebrating Roman victory over the Dacians. 563 BC Buddha, the religious leader, is born. 115— 509 BC King Lucius Tarquinius Superbus (Tarquin the Proud) is expelled King Servius Tullius (579–534 BC) 551–479 BC Confucius, Chinese philosopher. 550— and the Roman Republic established. King Lucius Tarquinius Superbus (534–509 BC) 550 BC Foundation of the Achaemenid (First Persian) Empire 120— Emperor Hadrian (AD 117–138) AD 127 Kanishka becomes king of the Kushan Empire of by Cyrus the Great.
    [Show full text]
  • Christianity in the Roman Empire
    Christianity in the Roman Empire Origins of Christianity Jews had considerable independence in the Hellenistic era but by A.D. 6 Judea was under Roman rule directed by an official called a procurator. The Sadducees promoted cooperation, the Pharisees promoted adherence to the Jewish belief system. Essenes kept to themselves and the Zealots promoted violent overthrow. Jewish revolt in A.D. 66 was put down hard by Romans and the Jewish temple in Jerusalem destroyed. Christianity was spawned from Judiaism. Both religions are monotheistic (belief in one God) and both worship the same God. However, some Jews embraced a man called Jesus (born c. 4 BC) as their Mesiah (Savior) and the completion of prophecies associated with Judiaism. Jesus preached that “his mission was to complete the salvation that God had promised Israel…” He taught “humility, charity, and love towards others.” Jewish leaders ultimately turned him over to the Roman procurator Pontius Pilate who had him crucified. After his death (c. 33 AD) Jesus’ followers “proclaimed he had risen from the dead and appeared to them”. “They believed Jesus to be the Messiah (anointed one), the long expected deliverer who would save Israel from its foes.” He claimed his objective was to fulfill God’s law which in part says love God with all your heart, mind, and soul and “love your neighbor as yourself”. He focused on “ethical concepts – humility, charity, and love towards others” These concepts helped shape the value system of Western civilization. One huge difference in Judiasm and Christianity is that those embracing Christianity believed that a relationship with Jesus and God was for everyone, not just Jews.
    [Show full text]
  • Vespasian Begins the War Jewish War Chronology (Part 1)
    Vespasian Begins the War Jewish War Chronology (Part 1) By Ed Stevens -- Then and Now Podcast -- Aug 4, 2013 INTRODUCTION: A. Well, here we are for another round of historical studies, to help us learn from the past, and build a better worldview for the future. B. Let's pray before we begin -- Infinite and Eternal God of the universe, possessor of immortality and giver of light and life to all your chosen ones: We worship You and bless your Holy Name for saving us Gentiles and grafting us into your holy people. We seek Your face and ask for your Truth to light our way so that we can follow you all the days of our life, both here and in the heavens above. Be with us here as we study the Bible and history, and enable us to understand it, so that we can apply it to our lives in a way that lets Your light shine through us to enlighten the pathway of others. We pray this in the Name of Our Glorious Savior and Lord, Jesus. Amen. C. Last time we looked at the early months of the rebellion (August through December AD 66). We saw how the Zealots quickly organized their government and prepared for the Roman attack. The Roman Legate in Antioch, Cestius Gallus, did not waste any time responding to the rebellion, but his attack on Jerusalem was mismanaged from start to finish. His failure to squash the rebellion, only strengthened and emboldened the Zealot cause, and made the carnage, misery, and destruction seventy times worse than it would have been otherwise.
    [Show full text]
  • “Against Caesar's Wishes” Josephus As a Source for the Burning of the Temple
    “Against Caesar’s Wishes” Josephus as a Source for the Burning of the Temple Tommaso Leoni [email protected] Graduate Programme in History York University, Toronto Dipartimento di Scienze Storiche Sezione di Storia dell’Antichità Università degli Studi di Ferrara Tommaso Leoni - «Against Caesar’s wishes». Josephus as a source for the burning of the Temple “Against Caesar’s Wishes” Josephus as a Source for the Burning of the Temple Tommaso Leoni The destruction of the Temple of Jerusalem is probably the episode that more than any other has aroused the criticism of modern scholars about Josephus’ historical reliability. Facing two opposing testimonies – that of the Bellum Iudaicum, which acquits Titus of any responsibility1, and that of the Chronica by Sulpicius Severus, which instead accuses him expressly2 – very few have doubts about thinking that the version of the Christian chronographer should be preferred. This general trend has been greatly influenced by the authoritative judgement set out by Jacob Bernays and Theodor 1 The dramatic succession of the events that led to the fire of the Sanctuary is vividly narrated in Book VI of the Jewish War: Ioseph. Bell. Iud. 6.236-243 (in view of the decisive attack a council of war is convoked, in which Titus takes position in favour of the preservation of the building); 6.244-253 (on repelling a double sally of the Jews a Roman squad pursues them up to the Sanctuary, and it is then that a soldier – “urged by some supernatural impulse” [daimoni/w | o(rmh =| tini xrw/menoj: 6.252] – grasps a fire-brand and hurls it through a small golden window on the northern side of the building complex); 6.254-266 (Titus rushes to the spot along with his officers and the legions; both with exhortations and threats he commands the flames to be extinguished, but the assault soon becomes unrestrainable and the battle turns into a slaughter; final conflagration of the Temple).
    [Show full text]