Project Financing and Implementation Plan TM

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Project Financing and Implementation Plan TM GSATS 2040 METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN UPDATE APPENDIX I Technical Memorandum PROJECT FINANCING AND IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Prepared for: Prepared by: October 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction ............................................................................................. 1 2. Project Identification .................................................................................. 1 3. Project Scoring Criteria ............................................................................... 1 3.1 GSATS Project Scoring Criteria Breakdown ...................................................... 3 3.1.1 Traffic Volume and Congestion ........................................................... 3 3.1.2 Public Safety ................................................................................ 4 3.1.3 Livability ..................................................................................... 4 3.1.4 Financial Viability and Maintenance Cost ............................................... 4 3.1.5 Functional Class (Truck Traffic) .......................................................... 5 3.1.6 Environmental Impact ..................................................................... 5 3.1.7 Consistency with Local Land Use Plans ................................................. 6 3.1.8 Pavement Quality Index, Cost, and Total Reduction in Vehicle Miles Traveled* . 6 4. Roadway Recommendations .......................................................................... 6 4.1 New Construction Recommendations ............................................................. 7 4.2 Widening Recommendations ....................................................................... 9 4.3 Access Management/Streetscape/Complete Streets Recommendations .................. 12 4.4 Project Prioritization .............................................................................. 14 4.5 Project Cost Estimation and Roadway Design Concepts ..................................... 20 5. Financing and Implementation .....................................................................21 5.1 Roadway Funding Sources and Revenue Forecasts ........................................... 21 5.1.1 Federal and State Funding Sources .................................................... 21 5.1.2 Local Funding Source – RIDE III ......................................................... 22 5.1.3 Additional Funding Sources ............................................................. 23 5.2 Roadway Revenue Forecast ...................................................................... 23 5.3 Recommended Projects by Forecast Year ..................................................... 23 5.4 South Carolina Act 114 ............................................................................ 41 5.5 North Carolina DOT SPOT 4.0 .................................................................... 41 5.5.1 GSATS’ Local Input Point Assignment ................................................. 42 5.6 Alternative Funding Strategies ................................................................... 43 5.7 Policy Recommendations ......................................................................... 44 5.7.1 System Preservation ...................................................................... 44 5.7.2 System Efficiency ......................................................................... 44 5.7.3 Safety and Security ....................................................................... 45 5.7.4 Travel Demand Management ............................................................ 45 5.7.5 Land Use and Urban Design ............................................................. 46 5.7.6 Environmental Mitigation ................................................................ 46 5.7.7 Technology ................................................................................ 46 i GRAND STRAND AREA TRANSPORTATION STUDY 2040 METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN UPDATE PROJECT FINANCING AND IMPLEMENTATION PLAN APPENDIX I LIST OF TABLES Table 3-1: GSATS Road Widening Projects Criteria..................................................... 2 Table 3-2: GSATS New Road Location Projects Criteria ............................................... 3 Table 3-3: Traffic Volume and Congestion Point Scale ................................................ 4 Table 3-4: Public Safety Point Scale ...................................................................... 4 Table 3-5: Financial Viability and Maintenance Costs Point Scale ................................... 5 Table 3-6: Functional Class Point Scale .................................................................. 5 Table 3-7: Environmental Impact Point Scale ........................................................... 6 Table 4-1: New Construction Recommendations (South Carolina) ................................... 7 Table 4-2: New Construction Recommendations (North Carolina) ................................... 9 Table 4-3: Widening Recommendations (South Carolina) ............................................. 9 Table 4-4: Widening Recommendations (North Carolina) ............................................ 11 Table 4-5: Access Management/Streetscape/Complete Streets Recommendations (South Carolina) ..................................................................................................... 12 Table 4-6: Access Management/Streetscape/Complete Streets Recommendations (North Carolina) ..................................................................................................... 14 Table 4-7: South Carolina Roadway Projects Prioritization .......................................... 15 Table 4-8: North Carolina Roadway Projects Prioritization .......................................... 19 Table 5-1: South Carolina Roadway Revenue Forecast ............................................... 23 Table 5-2: North Carolina Roadway Revenue Forecast ............................................... 23 Table 5-3: 2017-2020 Project Recommendations (South Carolina) ................................. 25 Table 5-4: 2017-2020 Project Recommendations (North Carolina) ................................. 26 Table 5-5: 2021-2030 Project Recommendations (South Carolina) ................................. 27 Table 5-6: 2021-2030 Project Recommendations (North Carolina) ................................. 31 Table 5-7: 2031-2040 Project Recommendations (South Carolina) ................................. 31 Table 5-8: 2031-2040 Project Recommendations (North Carolina) ................................. 34 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 4-1: Typical Cross-Sections ....................................................................... 20 Figure 5-1: Project Recommendations by Horizon Year in Georgetown County, SC ............. 35 Figure 5-2: Project Recommendations by Horizon Year in Horry County, SC ..................... 37 Figure 5-3: Project Recommendations by Horizon Year in Brunswick County, NC ............... 39 APPENDIX Typical Cross Sections ii GRAND STRAND AREA TRANSPORTATION STUDY 2040 METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN UPDATE PROJECT FINANCING AND IMPLEMENTATION PLAN APPENDIX I 1. INTRODUCTION This technical memorandum documents the 2040 GSATS Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP) Update’s transportation projects scoring, transportation funding, and implementation plan. 2. PROJECT IDENTIFICATION During the 2040 MTP Update, a list of projects was initially generated from the previous GSATS 2035 Long Range Transportation Plan process. Member jurisdictions were then asked to review the previous list to update any change in information as well as provide new projects for consideration in the 2040 MTP. Projects from the 2035 list that were constructed or were deemed no longer practical by the sponsoring jurisdiction were removed. Additionally, new projects were identified using the public feedback received through the online WikiMap application during the public meetings held in Fall 2016. Improvements were also identified to address estimated demand and safety concerns in the region, based on available data compiled as part of this planning process. A final list of projects for consideration were submitted to the Steering Committee in March 2017 for approval. The projects to be ranked were categorized by type of improvement as follows: • New Capacity • Widening • Access Management/Streetscape/Complete Streets 3. PROJECT SCORING CRITERIA During the previous 2035 LRTP process, GSATS developed project prioritization criteria for evaluating projects to establish local priorities in the GSATS region. The GSATS prioritization criteria is compliant with the South Carolina Act 114 statewide framework for evaluating and funding projects in South Carolina and the North Carolina DOT SPOT 4.0 Prioritization Process for projects in North Carolina. [A discussion of the Act 114 and SPOT process and their relationship to the identified projects in this MTP is further described in this document.] The 2040 MTP continues these same prioritization criteria outlined in Tables 3-1 and 3-2. Table 3-1 lists the prioritization criteria for widening, corridor improvements, interchange, and large intersection projects. Table 3-2 lists the prioritization criteria for new capacity projects. Each set of criteria totals 100 maximum points. Both tables identify the accompanying GSATS 2040 Goal Area for each criterion. 1 GRAND STRAND AREA TRANSPORTATION STUDY 2040 METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN UPDATE PROJECT FINANCING AND IMPLEMENTATION PLAN APPENDIX I Table 3-1: GSATS Road Widening
Recommended publications
  • Carolina Heelsplitter (Lasmigona Decorata)
    Carolina Heelsplitter (Lasmigona decorata) 5-Year Review: Summary and Evaluation 2012 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Southeast Region Asheville Ecological Services Field Office Asheville, North Carolina 5-YEAR REVIEW Carolina heelsplitter (Lasmigona decorata) I. GENERAL INFORMATION. A. Methodology Used to Complete the Review: This 5-year review was accomplished using pertinent status data obtained from the recovery plan, peer-reviewed scientific publications, unpublished research reports, and experts on this species. Once all known and pertinent data were collected for this species, the status information was compiled and the review was completed by the species’ lead recovery biologist John Fridell in the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s (Service) Ecological Services Field Office in Asheville, North Carolina, with assistance from biologist Lora Zimmerman, formerly with the Service’s Ecological Services Field Office in Charleston, South Carolina. The Service published a notice in the Federal Register (FR [71 FR 42871]) announcing the 5-year review of the Carolina heelsplitter and requesting new information on the species. A 60-day public comment period was opened. No information about this species was received from the public. A draft of the 5-year review was peer-reviewed by six experts familiar with the Carolina heelsplitter. Comments received were evaluated and incorporated as appropriate. B. Reviewers. Lead Region: Southeast Region, Atlanta, Georgia - Kelly Bibb, 404/679-7132. Lead Field Office: Ecological Services Field Office, Asheville, North Carolina - John Fridell, 828/258-3939, Ext. 225. Cooperating Field Office: Ecological Services Field Office, Charleston, South Carolina - Morgan Wolf, 843/727-4707, Ext. 219. C. Background. 1.
    [Show full text]
  • TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Adopted by the GSATS Policy Committee Sept
    GRAND STRAND AREA TRANSPORTATION STUDY TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Adopted by the GSATS Policy Committee Sept. 11, 2020 FISCAL YEAR 2020 TIP PERIOD: OCTOBER 1, 2019 – SEPTEMBER 30, 2028 FY 2020 OCTOBER 1. 2019 – SEPTEMBER 30, 2020 FY 2021 OCTOBER 1. 2020 – SEPTEMBER 30, 2021 FY 2022 OCTOBER 1. 2021 – SEPTEMBER 30, 2022 FY 2023 OCTOBER 1. 2022 – SEPTEMBER 30, 2023 FY 2024 OCTOBER 1. 2023 – SEPTEMBER 30, 2024 FY 2025 OCTOBER 1. 2024 – SEPTEMBER 30, 2025 FY 2026 OCTOBER 1. 2025 – SEPTEMBER 30, 2026 FY 2027 OCTOBER 1. 2026 – SEPTEMBER 30, 2027 FY 2028 OCTOBER 1. 2027 – SEPTEMBER 30, 2028 The GSATS has established performance management targets for highway safety, infrastructure condition, congestion, system reliability, emissions, freight movement and transit. The GSATS anticipates meeting their identified targets with the mix of projects included in the GY 2019 – 2028 TIP. 2019-2028 Transportation Improvement Program Grand Strand Area Transportation Study KEY ARRA................................................................American Reinvestment and Recovery Act CAP...................................................................Capital CONST..............................................................Construction FTA....................................................................Federal Transit Administration FY......................................................................Fiscal Year NHS...................................................................National Highway System OP......................................................................Operating
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 8: Transportation - 1 Unincorporated Horry County
    INTRODUCTION Transportation plays a critical role in people’s daily routine and representation from each of the three counties, municipalities, addresses a minimum of a 20-year planning horizon and includes quality of life. It also plays a significant role in economic COAST RTA, SCDOT, and WRCOG. GSATS agencies analyze the both long- and short-range strategies and actions that lead to the development and public safety. Because transportation projects short- and long-range transportation needs of the region and offer development of an integrated, intermodal transportation system often involve local, state, and often federal coordination for a public forum for transportation decision making. that facilitates the efficient movement of people and goods. The funding, construction standards, and to meet regulatory Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP) is a 5 year capital projects guidelines, projects are identified many years and sometimes plan adopted by the GSATS and by SCDOT. The local TIP also decades prior to the actual construction of a new facility or includes a 3 year estimate of transit capital and maintenance improvement. Coordinating transportation projects with future requirements. The projects within the TIP are derived from the MTP. growth is a necessity. The Waccamaw Regional Council of Governments (WRCOG) not The Transportation Element provides an analysis of transportation only assists in managing GSATS, but it also helps SCDOT with systems serving Horry County including existing roads, planned or transportation planning outside of the boundaries of the MPO for proposed major road improvements and new road construction, Horry, Georgetown, and Williamsburg counties. SCDOT partnered existing transit projects, existing and proposed bicycle and with WRCOG to develop the Rural Long-Range Transportation Plan pedestrian facilities.
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents
    TABLE OF CONTENTS Area Agency on Aging 1 South Carolina Area Agencies on Aging 2 Adult Daycare Centers 5 Adult Protective Services 6 Dialysis Centers 7 Disability Resources 8 Disaster Care/Cleaning Services 9 Education and Leisure Organizations 10 Elder Law 11 Emergency Phone Numbers 12 Emergency Preparedness 13 Financial Advisors 14 Funeral Services 15 Government 16 Health Clinics 17 Hearing Resources 18 Home Care Services Non-Medical 19 Home Health Services 22 Hospice Providers 23 Hospitals 24 Housing 25 Libraries 26 Long Term Care Insurance 28 Medical Equipment Providers 29 Mental Health Services 30 Non-Profits 31 Nutrition / Food Pantries 32 Parks and Recreation 33 Regional County Aging 35 Residential Care Facilities 37 Scams/Fraud 38 Senior Centers 39 Transportation Providers 41 Veterans 42 Websites 43 Notes 44 The End 45 WACCAMAW AREA AGENCY ON AGING As individuals age, changes take place that affect both the mind and body. Tasks once easily completed may become increasingly difficult and require assistance. Family members may find themselves placed in a caregiving role. As the dedicated Area Agency on Aging (AAA), Waccamaw Regional Council of Governments exists to provide ​ ​ services and resources to seniors and their caregivers in the Waccamaw Region. The AAA offers the support many senior residents need to continue living comfortable, high-quality lives in their own homes for as long as possible. WRCOG also serves as the Aging and Disability Resource Center (ADRC) for the region. The ADRC works to ​ improve awareness of and access to resources and services for seniors, adults with disabilities and caregivers. Services include: ● The Family Caregiver Assistance program, which provides support, information, education ​ and small grants to family caregivers.
    [Show full text]
  • The Highlands at Socastee (Myrtle Beach)
    Market Feasibility Analysis The Highlands at Socastee State Route 707 Myrtle Beach, Horry County, South Carolina 29588 Prepared For Mr. Randy Aldridge Quad-State Development, Inc. 841 Sweetwater Avenue Florence, Alabama 35630 Effective Date January 26, 2016 Job Reference Number 15-525 JW 155 E. Columbus Street, Suite 220 Pickerington, Ohio 43147 Phone: (614) 833-9300 Bowennational.com TABLE OF CONTENTS A. Primary Market Area Analysis Summary (Exhibit S-2) B. Project Description C. Site Description and Evaluation D. Primary Market Area Delineation E. Market Area Economy F. Community Demographic Data G. Project-Specific Demand Analysis H. Rental Housing Analysis (Supply) I. Interviews J. Recommendations K. Signed Statement Requirement L. Qualifications M. Methodologies, Disclaimers & Sources Addendum A – Field Survey of Conventional Rentals Addendum B – NCHMA Member Certification & Checklist 10/19/15 2016 EXHIBIT S – 2 SCSHFDA PRIMARY MARKET AREA ANALYSIS SUMMARY: Development Name: The Highlands of Socastee Total # Units: 44 Location: State Route 707, Myrtle Beach, SC 29588 # LIHTC Units: 44 Socastee city limits, State Route 544 and State Route 31 to the north; Robert M. Grissom Parkway, Granddaddy Drive and Poinsett Road to the east; the Atlantic Ocean to the south; Spanish Oak Drive, PMA Boundary: Holmestown Road, State Route 707, Bay Road and the Waccamaw River to the west. Development Type: __X__Family ____Older Persons Farthest Boundary Distance to Subject: 10.0 miles RENTAL HOUSING STOCK (found on page H-1, 15 & 16) Type # Properties Total Units Vacant Units Average Occupancy All Rental Housing 21 3,469 165 95.2% Market-Rate Housing 12 2,669 165 93.8% Assisted/Subsidized Housing not to 2 152 0 100.0% include LIHTC LIHTC (All that are stabilized)* 9 648 0 100.0% Stabilized Comps** 6 416 0 100.0% Non-stabilized Comps 0 - - - * Stabilized occupancy of at least 93% (Excludes projects still in initial lease up).
    [Show full text]
  • SC EV Market Study
    SC EV Market Study 1 South Carolina Electric Vehicle Market Study Introduction 4 Current Assessment 5 Trends and Future Outlook 12 Implementation 17 Infrastructure Development 17 Educational Campaign: Plug in SC 22 1 Background Palmetto Clean Fuels (PCF) is an initiative of the South Carolina Office of Regulatory Staff - Energy Office (Energy Office). PCF is one of more than 100 U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Clean Cities designees and represents the entire state of South Carolina. Clean Cities is a locally based, voluntary public/private partnership created to promote energy use in the transportation sector that is clean, safe, sustainable, and less dependent upon foreign energy sources. Clean Cities builds on local initiatives and partnerships as well as nationwide networks to achieve its goals. By combining local decision- making with voluntary action by partners, this grassroots community action group seeks to create effective programs that support a sustainable nationwide alternative fuels market. PCF works to increase the use of alternative fuels and advanced vehicle technologies and strives to help public and private entities— as well as individuals— lower fuel costs, improve air quality, and reduce petroleum consumption. PCF also promotes idle reduction, fuel economy measures, vehicle miles traveled reductions, and bicycle and pedestrian efforts. 1 2 Introduction This study focuses on one aspect of PCF work—electric vehicles (EV). It builds on several regional studies as well as the past efforts of the organization, Plug-In Carolina. Plug-In Carolina, a registered non-profit, was selected to manage a program to install Electric Vehicle Supply Equipment (EVSE) funded with the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) through the Energy Office.
    [Show full text]
  • Sandblast Rally Stage Schedule Leg 1 Saturday March 3, 2018 Distance Target First TC / SS Location Stage Transit Total Minutes Due
    20 18 Rally Guide – NASA Rally Sport IS Grassroots! Contents 1 Introduction .......................................................................................................................................... 5 1.1 Sandblast Rally Chairman ........................................................................................................ 5 1.2 Atlantic Rally Cup History ...................................................................................................... 5 1.3 NASA Rally Sport Atlantic Rally Cup & RallyMoto™ Cup Points ....................................... 6 1.4 Two Way Radios ...................................................................................................................... 6 1.5 Hospitality ................................................................................................................................ 6 1.6 Event Passes & Plates .............................................................................................................. 6 1.7 Cheraw City Map ..................................................................................................................... 6 2 Past Sandblast Winners ........................................................................................................................ 7 3 Entry Details ........................................................................................................................................ 8 3.1 Titles for which the Rally Counts ............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register Volume 30 • Number 121
    FEDERAL REGISTER VOLUME 30 • NUMBER 121 Thursday, June 24, 1965 • Washington, D.C. Pages 8089-8148 Agencies in this issue— Atomic Energy Commission Civil Service Commission Commodity Credit Corporation Consumer and Marketing Service Federal Aviation Agency Federal Communications Commission Federal Power Commission Federal Reserve System Food and Drug Administration Immigration and Naturalization Service Interior Department . Interstate Commerce Commission Land Management Bureau Maritime Administration Securities and Exchange Commission Detailed list of Contents appears inside. Volume 78 UNITED STATES STATUTES AT LARGE [88th Cong ,, 2d Sess.l Contains laws and concurrent resolu­ merical listing of bills enacted into tions enacted by the Congress during public and private law, and a guide 1964, the twenty-fourth amendment to the legislative history of bills en­ to the Constitution, and Presidential acted into public law. proclamations. Included is a nu- Price: $8.75 Published by Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Service, General Services Administration Order from Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D .G ,20402 Published daily, Tuesday through Saturday (no publication on Sundays, Mondays, o FEDERALÄREGISTER on the day after an official Federal holiday), by the Office of the Federal Register, Nation Archives and Records Service, General Services Administration (mail address Nation Area Code 202 Phone 963-3261 Archives Building, Washington, D.G. 20408), pursuant to the authority contained in tn Federal Register Act, approved July 26, 1935 (49 Stat. 500, as amended; 44 U.S.C., ch. 8B ) , under regulations prescribed by the Admi - istrative Committee of the Federal Register, approved by the President (1 CFR Ch.
    [Show full text]
  • Comprehensive Plan
    HORRY COUNTY, South Carolina COMPREHENSIVE PLAN April 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS_____________________________________________ II TABLE OF GRAPHS, MAPS, PICTURES AND TABLES __________________ IX ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ___________________________________________ 1 INTRODUCTION __________________________________________________ 2 Reevaluating and Updating of the Envision 2025 Comprehensive Plan...................4 THE COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING PROCESS ........................................................4 Initial Community Outreach.......................................................................................4 ENVISION 2025 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE – 2007 COMMUNITY INPUT MEETINGS ...................................................................................................................5 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ____________________________________________ 7 POPULATION ELEMENT ___________________________________________ 12 POPULATION GROWTH............................................................................................12 POPULATION PROJECTIONS ..................................................................................14 SEASONAL POPULATION.........................................................................................15 POPULATION COMPOSITION ..................................................................................16 RACE AND ETHNICITY..............................................................................................16 AGE.............................................................................................................................16
    [Show full text]
  • Layout 1 (Page 1)
    544 Carolina Forest Blvd GEORGETOWN COUNTY - 843-545-3213 Tanger Outlet The S.C. Department of EMERGENCY NUMBERS (Police) (843) Transportation Incident Atlantic Beach . 248-1520 Response Unit assists HORRY COUNTY - Dial *HP - The Horry Aynor . 358-3900 County area served is S.C. 31 from S.C. Forestbrook Rd motorists with minor repairs Conway. 248-1790 544 to S.C. 22, U.S. 501 from Myrtle Horry County . 915-5350 to disabled vehicles, assists Beach to Conway: the U.S. 17 Bypass; with traffic control and and S.C. 905. For help dial *HP on your Loris . 756-4001 incident management and cellular phone and ask for S.C. DOT Myrtle Beach . 918-1382 George Bishop Pkwy River Oaks Dr when needed, provides first Incident Response North Myrtle Beach. 280-5511 aid until emergency medical Surfside Beach. 913-6368 services arrive. BRUNSWICK COUNTY - 910-259-4919 S.C. Highway Patrol . 365-5001 Socastee Blvd. Socastee 501 Hwy. 57 Farrow Coastal Grand Mall Harrelson Blvd 9 Parkw BYPASS 90 Seaboard St Broadway 31 Watertower Rd. LITTLE TO SUNSET BEACH ay 17 at the Beach AND OCEAN ISLE Robert Grissom Parkway Grand Dunes RIVER 82nd Parkway Boulevard 10th Ave.N 21st Ave N 38th Ave N 62nd Ave N 76th Ave N 17 29th Ave N 48th Ave N 67th Ave N 79th Ave N NORTH CAROLINA 22 SOUTH CAROLINA Mineola Ave. Highway 15 Baldwin Ave. Possum Robert Edge Pkwy 904 Myrtle 179 Lake Arrowhead Lake Rd Trot Rd Beach Barefoot Mall Sea Mountain Hwy Oak Chestnut Rd Landing Grand Strand Airport 17 CALABASH Myrtle Beach BUSINESS Tanger International Outlet 11th Ave N The Market Little River
    [Show full text]
  • Victoria-Office-Warehouse Building 1605 AMERICAN WAY - NORTH INDUSTRIAL PARK MYRTLE BEACH, SC 29577
    INDUSTRIAL PROPERTY FOR SALE Victoria-Office-Warehouse Building 1605 AMERICAN WAY - NORTH INDUSTRIAL PARK MYRTLE BEACH, SC 29577 ROB MURPHY B.W. "RUSTY" HELM 843.626.3400 843.626.3400 [email protected] [email protected] 4706 Oleander Drive, Myrtle Beach, SC 29577-3537 | www.keystonecommercial.com EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Victoria-Office-Warehouse Building 1605 AMERICAN WAY - NORTH INDUSTRIAL PARK MYRTLE BEACH, SC 29577 PROPERTY HIGHLIGHTS • Conveniently located near Myrtle Beach International Airport and Major Traffic Arteries. • Site consists of approximately .51 Acres. • Approximately 110 Feet of Road Frontage on American Way. • Identified as PIN# 44204030018, Lot # 57, City of Myrtle Beach, SC. • Annual Real Estate Taxes 2020: $8,870 City of Myrtle Beach. • Average Daily Traffic Count – 46,800 (Source: SCDOT 2019) –Highway 17 Bypass. • IMPROVEMENTS: • Approximately 8,720 Total SF Office/Warehouse Space. • Approximately 2,523 SF of Climate Controlled Office/ Showroom Space. • Four (4) Offices, Reception Area, Showroom, Kitchen Area, Three (3) Bathrooms, Conference Room, Two (2) Utility OFFERING SUMMARY Closets, Recessed Lighting, Tile Flooring Sale Price: $819,000 • Approximately 2,523 SF of 2nd Story Storage. Building Size: 8,720 SF Lot Size: 0.51 Acres • Metal Building with Nichiha Cedar Cement Siding Panels. Number Of Units: 1 • Heavy Duty Concrete Parking with ingress/egress access to Price / SF: $93.92 Warehouse and Two 14’ Roll Up Doors. Year Built: 2019 • Heavy Duty Glass Storefront Windows and Door. Zoning: LM • Approximately 657 SF Mezzanine. For Zoning Map • Three Phase 200 Amp Power For Zoning Codes • Irrigation System, Lighted Parking Boards, Exterior Wall PROPERTY OVERVIEW Mounted Lighting, Gutters and Downspouts.
    [Show full text]
  • Transportation Improvement Program
    GRAND STRAND AREA TRANSPORTATION STUDY TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FISCAL YEAR 2019 TIP PERIOD: OCTOBER 1, 2015-SEPTEMBER 30, 2022 CONSIDERED BY THE POLICY COMMITTEE: June 26, 2015 REVIEWED FOR PUBLIC COMMENT: MAY 8, 2015 – JUNE 8, 2015 AMENDMENT (MAJOR) #1 ADOPTED BY THE POLICY COMMITTEE: February 26, 2016 REVIEWED FOR PUBLIC COMMENT: JANUARY 8, 2016 – FEBRUARY 15, 2016 AMENDMENT (MAJOR) #2 ADOPTED BY THE POLICY COMMITTEE: September 23, 2016 REVIEWED FOR PUBLIC COMMENT: SEPTEMBER 9, 2016 – OCTOBER 9, 2016 AMENDMENT (MAJOR) #3 ADOPTED BY THE POLICY COMMITTEE: February 15, 2019 REVIEWED FOR PUBLIC COMMENT: FEBRUARY 15, 2019 – MARCH 18, 2019 FY 2016 OCTOBER 1, 2015 – SEPTEMBER 30, 2016 FY 2017 OCTOBER 1, 2016 – SEPTEMBER 30, 2017 FY 2018 OCTOBER 1, 2017 – SEPTEMBER 30, 2018 FY 2019 OCTOBER 1, 2018 – SEPTEMBER 30, 2019 FY 2020 OCTOBER 1, 2019 – SEPTEMBER 30, 2020 FY 2021 OCTOBER 1, 2020 – SEPTEMBER 30, 2021 FY 2022 OCTOBER 1, 2021 – SEPTEMBER 30, 2022 2015-2022 Transportation Improvement Program Grand Strand Area Transportation Study KEY ARRA ............................................................American Reinvestment and Recovery Act CAP................................................................Capital CONST ..........................................................Construction FTA ................................................................Federal Transit Administration NHS................................................................National Highway System OP ...................................................................Operating
    [Show full text]