On the Classical Energy Equipartition Theorem

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

On the Classical Energy Equipartition Theorem 176 Brazilian Journal of Physics, vol. 30, no. 1, Marco, 2000 On the Classical Energy Equipartition Theorem 1 2 y J. A. S. Lima and A. R. Plastino 1 Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, Departamento de F sica, Caixa Postal 1641, 59072-970 Natal, RN, Brazil 2 Facultad de Ciencias Astronomicas y Geo sicas Universidad Nacional de La Plata, C.C. 727, 1900 La Plata, Argentina Received 20 April 1999. Revised version received on 17 Septemb er 1999 A general pro of of the energy equipartition theorem is given. Our derivation holds for any distribu- tion function dep ending on the phase space variables only through the Hamiltonian of the system. This approach generalizes the standard theorem in two main directions. On the one hand, it con- siders the contribution to the total mean energy of homogeneous functions having a more general typ e than the ones usually discussed in the literature. On the other hand, our pro of do es not rely on the assumption of a Boltzmann-Gibbs exp onential distribution. The classical energy equipartition theorem consti- value of g is given by tutes an imp ortant result in thermo dynamics, statisti- 1 cal mechanics and kinetic theory, which has b een ex- kT : 3 hg i = r tensively discussed in the literature [1-9]. Its simplest version deals with the contribution to the mean energy We emphasize that the pro of furnished byTurner is of a system in thermal equilibrium at temp erature T valid only for one homogeneous degree of freedom and due to quadratic terms in the Hamiltonian. More pre- makes explicit use of the exp onential Boltzmann-Gibbs cisely, it attests that any canonical variable x entering distribution. In brief, the main goal of the presentwork the Hamiltonian through an additive term prop ortional is just to relax these twohyp otheses. We b elieve that kT 2 to x has a thermal mean energy equal to , where k the analysis of the basic conditions needed for the valid- 2 is the Boltzmann constant. The most familiar example ity of the equipartition theorem will contribute to the is provided by a three dimensional classical ideal gas understanding of its physical meaning and to the clari - P 2 p with Hamiltonian =2m. The mean value of the i cation of its relationship with other physical principles i kinetic energy asso ciated with the x-comp onent of the and theorems. As it app ears, the version of equipar- velo cityofeach particle is ensemble average is denoted tition theorem presented here have at least twointer- by hi, esting virtues. The rst one is to extend the scop e of the theorem so as to incorp orate the case of an homo- E D E D 1 1 1 geneous comp onent of the Hamiltonian dep ending on 2 2 = = m x_ p kT : 1 x many canonical variables. The second one is to demon- 2 2m 2 strate that the theorem is not an exclusive prop erty Some time ago, the derivation of the equipartition of the exp onential Boltzmann-Gibbs distribution func- theorem was generalized byTurner[7] in order to in- tion. We shall see that the theorem holds true essen- clude the presence of nonquadratic terms. More pre- tially for any distribution function that dep ends on the cisely, assuming that the Hamiltonian H q ;p ;i = i i canonical variables only through the system's Hamil- 1; 2; :::f ; may b e additively separated in the form tonian. As it is well known, this set of distribution functions constitutes a family of legitimate stationary H = g x+ h; 2 solutions to Liouville's equation [3]. That is to say, they are fully consistent with the general principles of dynamics. As we p oint out b elow, these facts may also where x denotes one of the 2f co ordinates or momenta, b e exploited to go o d metho dological advantage in pre- g is an homogeneous function of degree r , and the func- senting the equipartition theorem. tion h is indep endentofx, he shown that the mean lima [email protected] y [email protected] J.A.S. Lima and A.R. Plastino 177 Let us consider a Hamiltonian system with f degrees Z n o of freedom i.e., with a 2f -dimensional phase space r I = A g x ;:::;x +h d : 11 1 L whose Hamiltonian function is of the form Computing the logarithmic derivatives of expressions H = g x ;:::;x + h; 4 1 L 10 and 11 and evaluating them at =1,we obtain, where x ;:::;x constitutes a subset of the 2f phase 1 L resp ectively, space co ordinates, h do es not dep end on any of those L 1 dI variables, and g is an homogeneous function of degree = L; 12 r . The homogeneitycharacter of g means that for any I d =1 >0, and r g x ;:::;x = g x ;:::;x : 5 dI 1 r 1 L 1 L = hg i: 13 I d I 1 =1 What we are going to prove is that the only prop- These last two relations give us a simple expression for erties of g determining its contribution hg i to the mean the mean value of g , namely value of the Hamiltonian are its degree r of homogene- ity and the number L of its arguments. Thus, our gen- L eral form of the energy equipartition theorem can b e hg i = I ; 14 1 r stated as follows: Al l the homogeneous terms of the or equivalently,by identifying with the inverse tem- Hamiltonian that are characterized by the same values p erature 1=k T , of the parameters r and L make the same contribution to the total mean energy. As already mentioned, we L shall assume that our Hamiltonian system is describ ed hg i = kT I : 15 1 r by a phase space probability density f q ;p dep end- i i This expression constitutes the main result of the ing on the canonical variables only through the system's present note. Before discussing the physical meaning Hamiltonian, of equation 15 a few comments on its mathematical derivation are in order. First of all, wehave assumed f q ;p = F [ H q ;p ]; 6 i i i i that b oth the integrals de ning the quantities I that is, equation 11 and dI =d converge. That is to say, equa- where is a dimensionless constant determined by the tion 15 is veri ed provided that the integrals for I and normalization condition and the constant is such that dI =d exist. The convergence of these integrals must the argument of the function F is dimensionless. For be checked in each sp eci c case by recourse to the stan- instance, in the case of Gibbs' canonical ensemble we x dard techniques of the Calculus. This is just the usual have F x= e , is equal to the logarithm of the par- situation with general theorems in theoretical physics, tition function Z , and the constant can b e identi ed as can b e illustrated by the following elementary exam- with the inverse temp erature 1=k T . ple. Given a one dimensional, normalized probability Now, in order to compute the mean value of g ,it distribution pxitiswell-known that proves convenienttointro duce the function D E 2 2 2 x hxi = hx i hxi : 16 Z n o I = A g x ;:::;x +h d ; 7 1 L However, this relation makes sense only if the integral R 2 2 hx i = x pxdx converges. There are imp ortant 2 probability distributions for which the moment hx i di- where d =dq ;:::;dp is the phase space volume el- 1 f verges. As a famous example wehave the Cauchy dis- ement and the function Ax is a primitive function of tribution F x, that is 1 0 A x= F x: 8 px= : 17 2 1+ x By recourse to the change of integration variables In spite of these problematic cases there can b e no doubt that it is b oth interesting and useful to know the 0 = x ; i =1;:::;L; 9 x i i general theorem 16, even if it holds only when the relevantintegrals converge. Another moral that we can it is easy to see that extract from the ab ove little example is that it is not enough to restrict our considerations to the moments L I = I ; 10 1 of p ositive quantities in order to avoid divergence dif- where I = I = 1. On the other hand, making ex- culties. It should b e stressed that in the case of the 1 plicit use of the homogeneityof g one nds equipartition theorem the problem of convergence is by 178 Brazilian Journal of Physics, vol. 30, no. 1, Marco, 2000 no means a consequence of our generalization. These n o 0 0 g x ;:::;x + h = a ; 19 kind of diculties may arise also within the standard 1;2 1 L case of the Boltzmann-Gibbs statistical mechanics. For and equation 10 follows immediately. As a nal com- instance, in the case of a classical self gravitating N - ment, notice that when one evaluates the derivative b o dy system not even the integral de ning the parti- with resp ect to of the expression 7 for I , a sur- tion function converges. Secondly, let us consider the face term app ears due to the dep endence on of the limits of integration for the integral 11 and the asso- b oundary of integration.
Recommended publications
  • Useful Constants
    Appendix A Useful Constants A.1 Physical Constants Table A.1 Physical constants in SI units Symbol Constant Value c Speed of light 2.997925 × 108 m/s −19 e Elementary charge 1.602191 × 10 C −12 2 2 3 ε0 Permittivity 8.854 × 10 C s / kgm −7 2 μ0 Permeability 4π × 10 kgm/C −27 mH Atomic mass unit 1.660531 × 10 kg −31 me Electron mass 9.109558 × 10 kg −27 mp Proton mass 1.672614 × 10 kg −27 mn Neutron mass 1.674920 × 10 kg h Planck constant 6.626196 × 10−34 Js h¯ Planck constant 1.054591 × 10−34 Js R Gas constant 8.314510 × 103 J/(kgK) −23 k Boltzmann constant 1.380622 × 10 J/K −8 2 4 σ Stefan–Boltzmann constant 5.66961 × 10 W/ m K G Gravitational constant 6.6732 × 10−11 m3/ kgs2 M. Benacquista, An Introduction to the Evolution of Single and Binary Stars, 223 Undergraduate Lecture Notes in Physics, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4419-9991-7, © Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013 224 A Useful Constants Table A.2 Useful combinations and alternate units Symbol Constant Value 2 mHc Atomic mass unit 931.50MeV 2 mec Electron rest mass energy 511.00keV 2 mpc Proton rest mass energy 938.28MeV 2 mnc Neutron rest mass energy 939.57MeV h Planck constant 4.136 × 10−15 eVs h¯ Planck constant 6.582 × 10−16 eVs k Boltzmann constant 8.617 × 10−5 eV/K hc 1,240eVnm hc¯ 197.3eVnm 2 e /(4πε0) 1.440eVnm A.2 Astronomical Constants Table A.3 Astronomical units Symbol Constant Value AU Astronomical unit 1.4959787066 × 1011 m ly Light year 9.460730472 × 1015 m pc Parsec 2.0624806 × 105 AU 3.2615638ly 3.0856776 × 1016 m d Sidereal day 23h 56m 04.0905309s 8.61640905309
    [Show full text]
  • Thermodynamic Temperature
    Thermodynamic temperature Thermodynamic temperature is the absolute measure 1 Overview of temperature and is one of the principal parameters of thermodynamics. Temperature is a measure of the random submicroscopic Thermodynamic temperature is defined by the third law motions and vibrations of the particle constituents of of thermodynamics in which the theoretically lowest tem- matter. These motions comprise the internal energy of perature is the null or zero point. At this point, absolute a substance. More specifically, the thermodynamic tem- zero, the particle constituents of matter have minimal perature of any bulk quantity of matter is the measure motion and can become no colder.[1][2] In the quantum- of the average kinetic energy per classical (i.e., non- mechanical description, matter at absolute zero is in its quantum) degree of freedom of its constituent particles. ground state, which is its state of lowest energy. Thermo- “Translational motions” are almost always in the classical dynamic temperature is often also called absolute tem- regime. Translational motions are ordinary, whole-body perature, for two reasons: one, proposed by Kelvin, that movements in three-dimensional space in which particles it does not depend on the properties of a particular mate- move about and exchange energy in collisions. Figure 1 rial; two that it refers to an absolute zero according to the below shows translational motion in gases; Figure 4 be- properties of the ideal gas. low shows translational motion in solids. Thermodynamic temperature’s null point, absolute zero, is the temperature The International System of Units specifies a particular at which the particle constituents of matter are as close as scale for thermodynamic temperature.
    [Show full text]
  • Chemical Engineering Thermodynamics
    CHEMICAL ENGINEERING THERMODYNAMICS Andrew S. Rosen SYMBOL DICTIONARY | 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Symbol Dictionary ........................................................................................................................ 3 1. Measured Thermodynamic Properties and Other Basic Concepts .................................. 5 1.1 Preliminary Concepts – The Language of Thermodynamics ........................................................ 5 1.2 Measured Thermodynamic Properties .......................................................................................... 5 1.2.1 Volume .................................................................................................................................................... 5 1.2.2 Temperature ............................................................................................................................................. 5 1.2.3 Pressure .................................................................................................................................................... 6 1.3 Equilibrium ................................................................................................................................... 7 1.3.1 Fundamental Definitions .......................................................................................................................... 7 1.3.2 Independent and Dependent Thermodynamic Properties ........................................................................ 7 1.3.3 Phases .....................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Ideal Gas Law
    ATMO 551a Fall 2010 Ideal gas law The ideal gas law is one of the great achievements of Thermodynamics. It relates the pressure, temperature and density of gases. It is VERY close to true for typical atmospheric conditions. It assumes the molecules interact like billiard balls. For water vapor with its large permanent electric dipole moment, it does not quite behave as an ideal gas but even it is close. The microscopic version of the ideal gas law is P = n kB T where P is pressure in pascals, n is the number density of the gas in molecules per cubic meter -23 and T is the temperature in Kelvin and kB is Boltzmann’s constant = 1.38x10 J/K. For typical atmospheric conditions, n is huge and kB is always tiny. So there is a different “macroscopic” version of the ideal gas law with numbers that are easier to work with. Avogadro’s number is the number of molecules in a “mole” where a mole is defined such that 1 mole of a molecules has a mass in grams equal to the mass of an individual molecule in atomic mass units (amu). For example, 1 mole of hydrogen atoms has a mass of ~1 gram. The number 23 -1 of molecules in a mole is given by Avogadro’s number, NA = 6.02214179(30)×10 mol . We multiply and divide the first equation by NA to get P = n kB T = n/NA kBNA T = N R* T where N is the number of moles per unit volume = n/NA and R* is the ideal gas constant = kB NA.
    [Show full text]
  • Lecture 25 - Kinetic Theory of Gases; Pressure
    PHYS 172: Modern Mechanics Fall 2010 Lecture 25 - Kinetic theory of gases; pressure Chapter 12.8, bits of Chapter 13 CLICKER QUESTION #1 Reading Question (Sections 12.7–12.8) There is only a trace amount of helium in the air we breathe. Why? A. There never was much helium on Earth to begin with. B. At ordinary temperatures, most helium atoms have speeds greater than the escape velocity. C. Most of the helium can be found at very high altitudes, not at the surface. D. The low mass helium atoms are more likely to gradually escape from the Earth. E. Since helium does not bond to other elements, it is less likely to be trapped on Earth. CLICKER QUESTION #1 Reading Question (Sections 12.7–12.8) There is only a trace amount of helium in the air we breathe. Why? B. At ordinary temperatures, most helium atoms have speeds greater than the escape velocity. NO!! But A FEW do. D. The low mass helium atoms are more likely to gradually escape from the Earth. The rare tail of the Maxwell Boltzmann distribution. Summary of Statistical Mechanics (Chapter 12 - Entropy) (q + N − 1)! Ω= Counting states q!(N − 1)1 S = kB lnΩ Entropy 1 ∂S ≡ T ∂Eint Temperature ΔE ΔEatom 1 system C = = Heat capacity ΔT N ΔT ΔE − P(ΔE) ∝ e kT Boltzmann distribution Rhetorical Question How do we know that the definition of temperature that we got from statistics & entropy agrees with standard definitions? 1 ∂S ≡ T ∂Eint The most common definition of temperature comes from the ideal gas law: PV=(#ofMoles)RT, or P = nkT.
    [Show full text]
  • Physics Formulas List
    Physics Formulas List Home Physics 95 Physics Formulas 23 Listen Physics Formulas List Learning physics is all about applying concepts to solve problems. This article provides a comprehensive physics formulas list, that will act as a ready reference, when you are solving physics problems. You can even use this list, for a quick revision before an exam. Physics is the most fundamental of all sciences. It is also one of the toughest sciences to master. Learning physics is basically studying the fundamental laws that govern our universe. I would say that there is a lot more to ascertain than just remember and mug up the physics formulas. Try to understand what a formula says and means, and what physical relation it expounds. If you understand the physical concepts underlying those formulas, deriving them or remembering them is easy. This Buzzle article lists some physics formulas that you would need in solving basic physics problems. Physics Formulas Mechanics Friction Moment of Inertia Newtonian Gravity Projectile Motion Simple Pendulum Electricity Thermodynamics Electromagnetism Optics Quantum Physics Derive all these formulas once, before you start using them. Study physics and look at it as an opportunity to appreciate the underlying beauty of nature, expressed through natural laws. Physics help is provided here in the form of ready to use formulas. Physics has a reputation for being difficult and to some extent that's http://www.buzzle.com/articles/physics-formulas-list.html[1/10/2014 10:58:12 AM] Physics Formulas List true, due to the mathematics involved. If you don't wish to think on your own and apply basic physics principles, solving physics problems is always going to be tough.
    [Show full text]
  • Derivation of the Boltzmann Principle ͒ Michele Campisia Institute of Physics, University of Augsburg, Universitätsstrasse 1, D-86135 Augsburg, Germany ͒ Donald H
    Derivation of the Boltzmann principle ͒ Michele Campisia Institute of Physics, University of Augsburg, Universitätsstrasse 1, D-86135 Augsburg, Germany ͒ Donald H. Kobeb Department of Physics, University of North Texas, P.O. Box 311427, Denton, Texas 76203-1427 ͑Received 22 September 2009; accepted 4 January 2010͒ W We derive the Boltzmann principle SB =kB ln based on classical mechanical models of thermodynamics. The argument is based on the heat theorem and can be traced back to the second half of the 19th century in the works of Helmholtz and Boltzmann. Despite its simplicity, this argument has remained almost unknown. We present it in a contemporary, self-contained, and accessible form. The approach constitutes an important link between classical mechanics and statistical mechanics. © 2010 American Association of Physics Teachers. ͓DOI: 10.1119/1.3298372͔ I. INTRODUCTION struct a one-dimensional mechanical model of thermody- namics in Sec. III according to the work of Helmholtz.3 The One of the most intriguing equations of contemporary concepts of ergodicity and microcanonical probability distri- physics is Boltzmann’s celebrated principle bution emerge naturally in this model and are introduced in S = k ln W, ͑1͒ Sec. IV. In Sec. V we generalize the one-dimensional model B B to more realistic Hamiltonian systems of N-particles in three where kB is Boltzmann’s constant. Despite its unquestionable dimensions. At this stage the ergodic hypothesis is assumed success in providing a means to compute the thermodynamic and Eq. ͑2͒ is derived. In Sec. VI we point out that the entropy of isolated systems based on counting the number W mechanical entropy of Eq.
    [Show full text]
  • Principle of Equipartition of Energy -Dr S P Singh (Dept of Chemistry, a N College, Patna)
    Principle of Equipartition of Energy -Dr S P Singh (Dept of Chemistry, A N College, Patna) Historical Background 1843: The equipartition of kinetic energy was proposed by John James Waterston. 1845: more correctly proposed by John James Waterston. 1859: James Clerk Maxwell argued that the kinetic heat energy of a gas is equally divided between linear and rotational energy. ∑ Experimental observations of the specific heat capacities of gases also raised concerns about the validity of the equipartition theorem. ∑ Several explanations of equipartition's failure to account for molar heat capacities were proposed. 1876: Ludwig Boltzmann expanded this principle by showing that the average energy was divided equally among all the independent components of motion in a system. ∑ Boltzmann applied the equipartition theorem to provide a theoretical explanation of the Dulong-Petit Law for the specific heat capacities of solids. 1900: Lord Rayleigh instead put forward a more radical view that the equipartition theorem and the experimental assumption of thermal equilibrium were both correct; to reconcile them, he noted the need for a new principle that would provide an "escape from the destructive simplicity" of the equipartition theorem. 1906: Albert Einstein provided that escape, by showing that these anomalies in the specific heat were due to quantum effects, specifically the quantization of energy in the elastic modes of the solid. 1910: W H Nernst’s measurements of specific heats at low temperatures supported Einstein's theory, and led to the widespread acceptance of quantum theory among physicists. Under the head we deal with the contributions of translational and vibrational motions to the energy and heat capacity of a molecule.
    [Show full text]
  • Entropy According to Boltzmann Kim Sharp, Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of Pennsylvania, 2016
    Entropy according to Boltzmann Kim Sharp, Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of Pennsylvania, 2016 "The initial state in most cases is bound to be highly improbable and from it the system will always rapidly approach a more probable state until it finally reaches the most probable state, i.e. that of the heat equilibrium. If we apply this to the second basic theorem we will be able to identify that quantity which is usually called entropy with the probability of the particular state." (Boltzmann, 1877) (1) Heat flows from a hot object to a cold one. Two gases placed into the same container will spontaneously mix. Stirring mixes two liquids; it does not un-mix them. Mechanical motion is irreversibly dissipated as heat due to friction. Scientists’ attempts to explain these commonplace observations spurred the development of thermodynamics and statistical mechanics and led to profound insights about the properties of matter, heat and time’s arrow. Central to this is the thermodynamic concept of entropy. 150 years ago (in 1865), Clausius famously said (2) "The energy of the universe remains constant. The entropy of the universe tends to a maximum." This is one formulation of the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics. In 1877 Boltzmann for the first time explained what entropy is and why, according to the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics, entropy increases (3). Boltzmann also showed that there were three contributions to entropy: from the motion of atoms (heat), from the distribution of atoms in space (position) (3), and from radiation (photon entropy)(4). These were the only known forms of entropy until the discovery of black hole entropy by Hawking and Bekenstein in the 1970's.
    [Show full text]
  • E = H Ν C = Λν E = Energy Υ = Velocity H Λ = P = Mν Ν = Frequency N = Principal Quantum Number Mυ Λ= Wavelength M = Mass 2.178 X 10 -18 P = Momentum E = - Joule N 2
    ADVANCED PLACEMENT CHEMISTRY EQUATIONS AND CONSTANTS ATOMIC STRUCTURE ∆E = h ν c = λν E = energy υ = velocity h λ = p = mν ν = frequency n = principal quantum number mυ λ= wavelength m = mass 2.178 x 10 -18 p = momentum E = - joule n 2 Speed of light, c = 3.00 x 10 8 ms -1 EQUILIBRIUM -34 + - Planck’s constant, h = 6.63 x 10 Js H A K = -23 -1 a []HA Boltzmann’s constant, k = 1.38 x 10 JK 23 -1 Avagadro’s number = 6.022 x 10 molecules mol - + -19 OH HB Electron charge, e = -1.602 x 10 coulomb Kb = []B 1 electron volt/atom = 96.5 kJmol -1 - + -14 Kw =[OH ] [H ] = 10 @ 25 °C = K a x K b Equilibrium constants pH = -log[H +], pOH = -log[OH -] 14 = pH + pOH Ka (weak acid) K (weak base) - b A pH = pK + log Kw (water) a []HA K (gas pressure) + p HB pOH = pK + log Kc (molar concentration) b []B S0 = standard entropy 0 pK a = - logK a, pK b = -logK b H = standard enthalpy 0 ∆n G = standard free energy Kp = K c(RT) where ∆n = moles of product gas - moles reactant gas E0 = standard reduction potential T = temperature THERMOCHEMISTRY/KINETICS n = moles ∆S0 = ΣS0 products - ΣS0 reactants m = mass q = heat 0 0 0 ∆H = ΣH f products - ΣH f reactants c = specific heat capacity 0 0 0 ∆G = ΣG f products - ΣG f reactants Cp = molar heat capacity at constant pressure 0 0 0 ∆G = ∆H - T ∆S Ea = activation energy = - RT ln K = -2.303 RT log K k = rate constant = - n ℑ E 0 ∆G = ∆G0 + RT ln Q = ∆G0 + 2.303 RT log Q A = frequency factor ∆ q = mc T ∆ = H Cp Faraday’s constant, ℑ = 96,500 coulombs per mole ∆T ln[A]t – ln[A] 0 = -kt of electrons 1 1 − = kt A
    [Show full text]
  • On the Radiative and Thermodynamic Properties of the Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation Using Cobe Firas Instrument Data
    ON THE RADIATIVE AND THERMODYNAMIC PROPERTIES OF THE COSMIC MICROWAVE BACKGROUND RADIATION USING COBE FIRAS INSTRUMENT DATA Anatoliy I Fisenko, Vladimir Lemberg ONCFEC Inc., 250 Lake Street, Suite 909, St. Catharines, Ontario L2R 5Z4, Canada ABSTRACT Use formulas to describe the monopole and dipole spectra of the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) radiation, the exact expressions for the temperature dependences of the radiative and thermodynamic functions, such as the total radiation power per unit area, total energy density, number density of photons, Helmholtz free energy density, entropy density, heat capacity at constant volume, pressure, enthalpy density, and internal energy density in the finite range of frequencies v1 ≤ v ≤ v2 are obtained. Since the dependence of temperature upon the redshift z is known, the obtained expressions can be simply presented in z representation. Utilizing experimental data for the monopole and dipole spectra measured by the COBE FIRAS instrument in the 60 - 600 GHz frequency interval at the temperature T = 2.728 K, the values of the radiative and thermodynamic functions, as well as the radiation density constant a and the Stefan-Boltzmann constant σ are calculated. In the case of the dipole spectrum, the constants a and σ, and the radiative and thermodynamic properties of the CMB radiation are obtained using the mean amplitude Tamp =3.369m K. It is shown that the Doppler shift leads to a renormalization of the radiation density constant a, the Stefan-Boltzmann constant σ, and the corresponding constants for the thermodynamic functions. The radiative and thermodynamic properties of the Cosmic Microwave Background radiation for the monopole and dipole spectra at the redshift z ≈ 1089 are calculated.
    [Show full text]
  • CONSTANTS Description Value Ideal Gas Constant (R) 0.0821 L•Atm/Mol
    CONSTANTS Description Value Ideal gas constant (R) 0.0821 L•atm/mol•K = 8.31 J/mol•K Faraday constant (F) 9.65 × 104 C/mol e – = 9.65 × 104 J/V•mol e – Planck's constant (h) 6.63 × 10–34 J•s Boltzmann constant (k) 1.38 × 10–23 J/K Molal freezing point depression constant for 1.86°C/m water (Kf) Molal boiling point elevation constant for 0.51°C/m water (Kb) Heat of fusion of water (ΔHfus) 334 J/g = 80 cal/g = 6.01 kJ/mol Heat of vaporization of water (ΔHvap) 2260 J/g = 540 cal/g = 40.7 kJ/mol Specific heat (cp) of water (liquid) 4.184 J/g•K = 4.184 J/g•°C = 1.0 cal/g•°C –14 Dissociation constant of water (Kw)1.0 × 10 at 25°C Standard atmospheric pressure 1 atm = 760 mm Hg = 760 torr = 101.325 kPa Speed of light in a vacuum (c) 3.00 × 108 m/s 1 calorie (cal) 4.184 J 1 watt (W) 1 J/s 23 Avogadro's number (NA) 6.02 × 10 Molar volume of a gas at STP 22.4 L FORMULAS Description Formula Ideal gas law PV = nRT Combined gas law P V P V 1 1 = 2 2 T1 T2 Gibbs free energy equation ΔG = ΔH – TΔS Nernst equation RT E = E ° – ln Q n F ⎛0.0257 V⎞ E = E ° – ⎜ ⎟ ln Q at 298 K ⎝ n ⎠ ⎛0.0592 V⎞ E = E ° – ⎜ ⎟ log Q at 298 K ⎝ n ⎠ Relationship between emf and free energy ΔG ° = –nFE ° change for reactants and products in their standard states ⎛ [conjugate base] ⎞ Henderson-Hasselbalch equation pH = pKa + log ⎜ ⎟ ⎝ [acid] ⎠ Photon energy E = h ν Speed of light c = λν Nuclear binding energy ΔE = c 2Δm Amount of heat (q) q = mcp ΔT Root-mean-square speed 3RT u = rms M Graham's law of diffusion r M 1 = 2 r2 M1 Relationship between the standard free- ΔG ° = – RT lnK energy change and the equilibrium constant ΔG ° = –2.303 RT logK Relationship between the standard free- Δ Δ ° G ° = Grxn + RT lnQ energy change and the free-energy change under nonstandard conditions NOTES FOR CHEMISTRY TEST Not all constants and formulas necessary are listed, nor are all constants and formulas listed used on this test.
    [Show full text]