DOCSLIB.ORG

Principle of Equipartition of Energy -Dr S P Singh (Dept of Chemistry, a N College, Patna)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Principle of Equipartition of Energy -Dr S P Singh (Dept of Chemistry, a N College, Patna) Principle of Equipartition of Energy -Dr S P Singh (Dept of Chemistry, A N College, Patna) Historical Background 1843: The equipartition of kinetic energy was proposed by John James Waterston. 1845: more correctly proposed by John James Waterston. 1859: James Clerk Maxwell argued that the kinetic heat energy of a gas is equally divided between linear and rotational energy. ∑ Experimental observations of the specific heat capacities of gases also raised concerns about the validity of the equipartition theorem. ∑ Several explanations of equipartition's failure to account for molar heat capacities were proposed. 1876: Ludwig Boltzmann expanded this principle by showing that the average energy was divided equally among all the independent components of motion in a system. ∑ Boltzmann applied the equipartition theorem to provide a theoretical explanation of the Dulong-Petit Law for the specific heat capacities of solids. 1900: Lord Rayleigh instead put forward a more radical view that the equipartition theorem and the experimental assumption of thermal equilibrium were both correct; to reconcile them, he noted the need for a new principle that would provide an "escape from the destructive simplicity" of the equipartition theorem. 1906: Albert Einstein provided that escape, by showing that these anomalies in the specific heat were due to quantum effects, specifically the quantization of energy in the elastic modes of the solid. 1910: W H Nernst’s measurements of specific heats at low temperatures supported Einstein's theory, and led to the widespread acceptance of quantum theory among physicists. Under the head we deal with the contributions of translational and vibrational motions to the energy and heat capacity of a molecule. Though the results are not correct except at sufficiently high temperatures, the procedure is nevertheless constructive. Although the average value of the velocity component in any single direction is zero because equal no. of molecules have components +u and –u, the average value of kinetic energy associated with a particular component has always a + ve value for both +ve and – ve values of average velocities, kinetic energy either or equals . We now use the different steps of Maxwell’s distribution function to evaluate average kinetic (+) (−) energy 1 1 ∴ ̅ = × 2 1 1 = ( ) ∙ ( ) ∙ ( ) × 2 1 1 = × × ( ) ( ) ( ) 2 1 = × × 2 × . 2 × . 2 × 2 and so on] [, ∫ ( ) = 2 ∫ ( ) ̅ = × ∙ ∙ 8 × × × 1 1 = = 4 2 [ ] / / / / / ∴ ̅ = × × = Similarly,= = × average= K.E. along Y and Z coordinates = and can be proved. ̅ = ̅ = ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- (1) Total average K.E. (along all coordinates) ∴ ̅ = ̅ = ̅ = ----- ----- (2) where is Boltzmann Constant. ∴ 1 1 1 Expression (1) (for the translational motion) is the mathematical representation of law of 2 2 2 Equipartition̅ = ̅ + ̅ + of ̅ energy,= which+ states+ as follows;= “The total energy of a molecule for a dynamical system in thermal equilibrium is divided equally among the degrees of freedom.” Here ‘degree of freedom’ is meant by the possible modes or directions of motion. But for all sorts of motions the generalized statement is made as ‘Each kind of energy of a molecule that can be expressed in general form ax2, where x is a coordinate or momentum, that contributes an amount of to the average energy of one molecule.’ ax2 term is referred to as ‘square term’ or ‘quadratic term’. The translational (kinetic) energy of a molecule is equal to where x, y, z represent the components of its velocity in three directions at right angles. The momentum , for example, is equal to and so the energy is given by ( + + thus) consisting of 3 quadratic terms. By the principle of equipartition of energy, as proved above, it should be in agreement with equation, .( Translational+ + motion,)/2 thus of every 3 × molecule can be revealed into three possible directions as stated above. = = The rotational energy of a molecule assumed to be of constant dimensions is proportional to the square of the angular momentum, so that each type of the rotation is represented by one square term, and thus should contribute per mole to the energy content. A diatomic or any linear molecule, exhibits rotation about two axes perpendicular to the line joining the nuclii. The rotational energy of a diatomic or any linear molecule should thus be , i.e. T per mole. 2 × A non linear molecule on the other hand, can rotate about three axes, so that the rotation should contribute . i.e. per mole to the energy of the system. The equation for the energy of rotation has the form 3 × (for a linear molecule) ∈.= + (for a non-linear molecule) where , , are angular velocities and , , are moments of inertia about the x, y and z ∈.= + + axes respectively. In the case of a linear molecules . The energy of a harmonic oscillator is given by the= sum= of the two quadratic terms, one representing the K.E. and the other the P.E. of the vibrations. By the equipartition principle the energy is, thus, expected to be , i.e., T per mole for each possible mode of vibration. In general, a nonlinear molecule containing n atoms possess (3n – 6) moles of vibrations, so that the vibrational energy contribution should be (3n – 6) T per mole. Diatomic and any linear molecule, however have (3n – 5) vibrational modes and the vibrational energy is expected to be (3n – 5) T per mole. Vibrations comprise either stretching or bending of molecules. To sum up the total average energy per molecule should be (for linear molecule) (for non-linear molecule) ̅ = + + (3 − 5) If these ̅values= are +multiplied + (3 by −the 6 )Avogadro’s no. the average energies per mole is . So for mono atomic gas Similarly, for polyatomic gas = ( ̅ × = & × = ) (linear molecule) (non-linear molecule) = + + (3 − 5) If r and v denote the degree of freedom for rotation and vibration than the total molar energy, according =to principle + of equipartition + (3 − 6) of energy will be 1 = (3 + + ) × and hence the heat capacity at the constant volume, 2 1 = = (3 + + ) The heat capacity at constant pressure, 2 = (3 + + ) + = (5 + + ) Heat capacity ratio, ∴ = = Application (i) Ideal gases provide an important application of the equipartition theorem Equipartition to derive the classical ideal gas law from Newtonian mechanics. The equipartition theorem provides a convenient way to derive the corresponding laws for an extreme relativisticideal gas. (ii) The equipartition theorem may also be used to derive the energy and pressure of "non-ideal gases" in which the particles also interact with one another through conservative forces whose potential U(r) depends only on the distance r between the particles. (iii) An anharmonic oscillator (in contrast to a simple harmonic oscillator) is one in which the potential energy is not quadratic in the extension q (measures the deviation of the system from equilibrium). Such oscillators provide a complementary point of view on the equipartition theorem. (iv) The equipartition theorem and the related virial theorem have long been used as a tool in astrophysics. (v) The equipartition theorem can be used to derive the Brownian motion of a particle from the Langevin equation. (vi) The same formulae may be applied to determining the conditions for star formation in giant molecular clouds.. Limitation (i) The law of equipartition breaks down when the thermal energy kBT is significantly smaller than the spacing between energy levels. (ii) The law of equipartition holds only for ergodic systems in thermal equilibrium, which implies that all states with the same energy must be equally and likely to be populated. *****.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Dark Matter 1 Introduction 2 Evidence of Dark Matter
    Proceedings Astronomy from 4 perspectives 1. Cosmology Dark matter Marlene G¨otz (Jena) Dark matter is a hypothetical form of matter. It has to be postulated to describe phenomenons, which could not be explained by known forms of matter. It has to be assumed that the largest part of dark matter is made out of heavy, slow moving, electric and color uncharged, weakly interacting particles. Such a particle does not exist within the standard model of particle physics. Dark matter makes up 25 % of the energy density of the universe. The true nature of dark matter is still unknown. 1 Introduction Due to the cosmic background radiation the matter budget of the universe can be divided into a pie chart. Only 5% of the energy density of the universe is made of baryonic matter, which means stars and planets. Visible matter makes up only 0,5 %. The influence of dark matter of 26,8 % is much larger. The largest part of about 70% is made of dark energy. Figure 1: The universe in a pie chart [1] But this knowledge was obtained not too long ago. At the beginning of the 20th century the distribution of luminous matter in the universe was assumed to correspond precisely to the universal mass distribution. In the 1920s the Caltech professor Fritz Zwicky observed something different by looking at the neighbouring Coma Cluster of galaxies. When he measured what the motions were within the cluster, he got an estimate for how much mass there was. Then he compared it to how much mass he could actually see by looking at the galaxies.
    [Show full text]
  • James Clerk Maxwell
    James Clerk Maxwell JAMES CLERK MAXWELL Perspectives on his Life and Work Edited by raymond flood mark mccartney and andrew whitaker 3 3 Great Clarendon Street, Oxford, OX2 6DP, United Kingdom Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. It furthers the University’s objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide. Oxford is a registered trade mark of Oxford University Press in the UK and in certain other countries c Oxford University Press 2014 The moral rights of the authors have been asserted First Edition published in 2014 Impression: 1 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without the prior permission in writing of Oxford University Press, or as expressly permitted by law, by licence or under terms agreed with the appropriate reprographics rights organization. Enquiries concerning reproduction outside the scope of the above should be sent to the Rights Department, Oxford University Press, at the address above You must not circulate this work in any other form and you must impose this same condition on any acquirer Published in the United States of America by Oxford University Press 198 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10016, United States of America British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data Data available Library of Congress Control Number: 2013942195 ISBN 978–0–19–966437–5 Printed and bound by CPI Group (UK) Ltd, Croydon, CR0 4YY Links to third party websites are provided by Oxford in good faith and for information only.
    [Show full text]
  • Useful Constants
    Appendix A Useful Constants A.1 Physical Constants Table A.1 Physical constants in SI units Symbol Constant Value c Speed of light 2.997925 × 108 m/s −19 e Elementary charge 1.602191 × 10 C −12 2 2 3 ε0 Permittivity 8.854 × 10 C s / kgm −7 2 μ0 Permeability 4π × 10 kgm/C −27 mH Atomic mass unit 1.660531 × 10 kg −31 me Electron mass 9.109558 × 10 kg −27 mp Proton mass 1.672614 × 10 kg −27 mn Neutron mass 1.674920 × 10 kg h Planck constant 6.626196 × 10−34 Js h¯ Planck constant 1.054591 × 10−34 Js R Gas constant 8.314510 × 103 J/(kgK) −23 k Boltzmann constant 1.380622 × 10 J/K −8 2 4 σ Stefan–Boltzmann constant 5.66961 × 10 W/ m K G Gravitational constant 6.6732 × 10−11 m3/ kgs2 M. Benacquista, An Introduction to the Evolution of Single and Binary Stars, 223 Undergraduate Lecture Notes in Physics, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4419-9991-7, © Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013 224 A Useful Constants Table A.2 Useful combinations and alternate units Symbol Constant Value 2 mHc Atomic mass unit 931.50MeV 2 mec Electron rest mass energy 511.00keV 2 mpc Proton rest mass energy 938.28MeV 2 mnc Neutron rest mass energy 939.57MeV h Planck constant 4.136 × 10−15 eVs h¯ Planck constant 6.582 × 10−16 eVs k Boltzmann constant 8.617 × 10−5 eV/K hc 1,240eVnm hc¯ 197.3eVnm 2 e /(4πε0) 1.440eVnm A.2 Astronomical Constants Table A.3 Astronomical units Symbol Constant Value AU Astronomical unit 1.4959787066 × 1011 m ly Light year 9.460730472 × 1015 m pc Parsec 2.0624806 × 105 AU 3.2615638ly 3.0856776 × 1016 m d Sidereal day 23h 56m 04.0905309s 8.61640905309
    [Show full text]
  • Acta Technica Jaurinensis
    Acta Technica Jaurinensis Győr, Transactions on Engineering Vol. 3, No. 1 Acta Technica Jaurinensis Vol. 3. No. 1. 2010 The Historical Development of Thermodynamics D. Bozsaky “Széchenyi István” University Department of Architecture and Building Construction, H-9026 Győr, Egyetem tér 1. Phone: +36(96)-503-454, fax: +36(96)-613-595 e-mail: [email protected] Abstract: Thermodynamics as a wide branch of physics had a long historical development from the ancient times to the 20th century. The invention of the thermometer was the first important step that made possible to formulate the first precise speculations on heat. There were no exact theories about the nature of heat for a long time and even the majority of the scientific world in the 18th and the early 19th century viewed heat as a substance and the representatives of the Kinetic Theory were rejected and stayed in the background. The Caloric Theory successfully explained plenty of natural phenomena like gas laws and heat transfer and it was impossible to refute it until the 1850s when the Principle of Conservation of Energy was introduced (Mayer, Joule, Helmholtz). The Second Law of Thermodynamics was discovered soon after that explanation of the tendency of thermodynamic processes and the heat loss of useful heat. The Kinetic Theory of Gases motivated the scientists to introduce the concept of entropy that was a basis to formulate the laws of thermodynamics in a perfect mathematical form and founded a new branch of physics called statistical thermodynamics. The Third Law of Thermodynamics was discovered in the beginning of the 20th century after introducing the concept of thermodynamic potentials and the absolute temperature scale.
    [Show full text]
  • Kinetyczno-Molekularnego Modelu Budowy Materii
    Roskal Z. E.: Prekursorzy kinetycznej teorii gazów. Zenon E. Roskal Prekursorzy kinetycznej teorii gazów Twórcy kinetycznej teorii gazów są dobrze znani zarówno fizykom jak i filozo- fom przyrody1, ale wiedza na temat prekursorów tej teorii jest na ogół mniej dostępna i równie słabo rozpowszechniona. Według opinii S. Brusha2 kinetyczno-molekularny model budowy materii, a ściślej kinetyczną teorię gazów3, w istotny sposób inicjuje4 dopiero publikacja niemieckiego przyrodnika A. K. Kröniga z 1856. W tym roku mija zatem dokładnie 150 lat od tego wydarzenia5. Praca Kröniga nie pozostała niezauważona w XIX wieku. Powoływał się na nią – obok prac Joule’a i Clausiusa – J. C. Maxwell6. Twórcy kinetyczno-molekularnego mo- 1 W pierwszej kolejności zaliczamy w poczet twórców tej teorii R. Clausiusa (1822-1888) J. C. Maxwella (1831-1879), L. Boltzmanna (1844-1906) i J. W. Gibbsa (1839-1903). Popularne i skrótowe przedstawienie historii kinetycznej teorii gazów można znaleźć m.in. w E. Mendoza, A Sketch for a History of the Kinetic Theory of gases, ,,Physics Today’’ 14 nr 3 (1961): 36-39. 2 Por. S. G. Brush, The development of the kinetic theory of gases: III. Clausius, ,,Annals of Science’’, 14 (1958): 185-196. Na opinię tę powołuje się m.in. E. Daub, Waterston, Rankine, and Clausius on the Kinetic Theory of Gases, ,,Isis’’ 61 nr 1 (1970): 105, ale mylnie podaje, imię niemieckiego fizyka pisząc o Adolfie Krönigu. Tamże, s. 105. 3 W pierwotnym sformułowaniu tej teorii podanym przez J. C. Maxwella była ona nazywana dynamiczna teorią gazów. Taką nazwę zawierał np. tytuł wykładu Maxwella (Illustrations of the Dynamical Theory of Gases) przedstawionego w Aberdeen w 1859 r.
    [Show full text]
  • S Chandrasekhar: His Life and Science
    REFLECTIONS S Chandrasekhar: His Life and Science Virendra Singh 1. Introduction Subramanyan Chandrasekhar (or `Chandra' as he was generally known) was born at Lahore, the capital of the Punjab Province, in undivided India (and now in Pakistan) on 19th October, 1910. He was a nephew of Sir C V Raman, who was the ¯rst Asian to get a science Nobel Prize in Physics in 1930. Chandra also went on to win the Nobel Prize in Physics in 1983 for his early work \theoretical studies of physical processes of importance to the structure and evolution of the stars". Chandra discovered that there is a maximum mass limit, now called `Chandrasekhar limit', for the white dwarf stars around 1.4 times the solar mass. This work was started during his sea voyage from Madras on his way to Cambridge (1930) and carried out to completion during his Cambridge period (1930{1937). This early work of Chandra had revolutionary consequences for the understanding of the evolution of stars which were not palatable to the leading astronomers, such as Eddington or Milne. As a result of controversy with Eddington, Chandra decided to shift base to Yerkes in 1937 and quit the ¯eld of stellar structure. Chandra's work in the US was in a di®erent mode than his initial work on white dwarf stars and other stellar-structure work, which was on the frontier of the ¯eld with Chandra as a discoverer. In the US, Chandra's work was in the mode of a `scholar' who systematically explores a given ¯eld. As Chandra has said: \There is a complementarity between a systematic way of working and being on the frontier.
    [Show full text]
  • Thermodynamic Temperature
    Thermodynamic temperature Thermodynamic temperature is the absolute measure 1 Overview of temperature and is one of the principal parameters of thermodynamics. Temperature is a measure of the random submicroscopic Thermodynamic temperature is defined by the third law motions and vibrations of the particle constituents of of thermodynamics in which the theoretically lowest tem- matter. These motions comprise the internal energy of perature is the null or zero point. At this point, absolute a substance. More specifically, the thermodynamic tem- zero, the particle constituents of matter have minimal perature of any bulk quantity of matter is the measure motion and can become no colder.[1][2] In the quantum- of the average kinetic energy per classical (i.e., non- mechanical description, matter at absolute zero is in its quantum) degree of freedom of its constituent particles. ground state, which is its state of lowest energy. Thermo- “Translational motions” are almost always in the classical dynamic temperature is often also called absolute tem- regime. Translational motions are ordinary, whole-body perature, for two reasons: one, proposed by Kelvin, that movements in three-dimensional space in which particles it does not depend on the properties of a particular mate- move about and exchange energy in collisions. Figure 1 rial; two that it refers to an absolute zero according to the below shows translational motion in gases; Figure 4 be- properties of the ideal gas. low shows translational motion in solids. Thermodynamic temperature’s null point, absolute zero, is the temperature The International System of Units specifies a particular at which the particle constituents of matter are as close as scale for thermodynamic temperature.
    [Show full text]
  • Virial Theorem and Gravitational Equilibrium with a Cosmological Constant
    21 VIRIAL THEOREM AND GRAVITATIONAL EQUILIBRIUM WITH A COSMOLOGICAL CONSTANT Marek N owakowski, Juan Carlos Sanabria and Alejandro García Departamento de Física, Universidad de los Andes A. A. 4976, Bogotá, Colombia Starting from the Newtonian limit of Einstein's equations in the presence of a positive cosmological constant, we obtain a new version of the virial theorem and a condition for gravitational equi­ librium. Such a condition takes the form P > APvac, where P is the mean density of an astrophysical system (e.g. galaxy, galaxy cluster or supercluster), A is a quantity which depends only on the shape of the system, and Pvac is the vacuum density. We conclude that gravitational stability might be infiuenced by the presence of A depending strongly on the shape of the system. 1. Introd uction Around 1998 two teams (the Supernova Cosmology Project [1] and the High- Z Supernova Search Team [2]), by measuring distant type la Supernovae (SNla), obtained evidence of an accelerated ex­ panding universe. Such evidence brought back into physics Ein­ stein's "biggest blunder", namely, a positive cosmological constant A, which would be responsible for speeding-up the expansion of the universe. However, as will be explained in the text below, the A term is not only of cosmological relevance but can enter also the do­ main of astrophysics. Regarding the application of A in astrophysics we note that, due to the small values that A can assume, i s "repul­ sive" effect can only be appreciable at distances larger than about 22 1 Mpc. This is of importance if one considers the gravitational force between two bodies.
    [Show full text]
  • Chemical Engineering Thermodynamics
    CHEMICAL ENGINEERING THERMODYNAMICS Andrew S. Rosen SYMBOL DICTIONARY | 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Symbol Dictionary ........................................................................................................................ 3 1. Measured Thermodynamic Properties and Other Basic Concepts .................................. 5 1.1 Preliminary Concepts – The Language of Thermodynamics ........................................................ 5 1.2 Measured Thermodynamic Properties .......................................................................................... 5 1.2.1 Volume .................................................................................................................................................... 5 1.2.2 Temperature ............................................................................................................................................. 5 1.2.3 Pressure .................................................................................................................................................... 6 1.3 Equilibrium ................................................................................................................................... 7 1.3.1 Fundamental Definitions .......................................................................................................................... 7 1.3.2 Independent and Dependent Thermodynamic Properties ........................................................................ 7 1.3.3 Phases .....................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Scientometric Portrait of Nobel Laureate S. Chandrasekhar
    :, Scientometric Portrait of Nobel Laureate S. Chandrasekhar B.S. Kademani, V. L. Kalyane and A. B. Kademani S. ChandntS.ekhar, the well Imown Astrophysicist is wide!)' recognised as a ver:' successful Scientist. His publications \\'ere analysed by year"domain, collaboration pattern, d:lannels of commWtications used, keywords etc. The results indicate that the temporaJ ,'ari;.&-tjon of his productivit." and of the t."pes of papers p,ublished by him is of sudt a nature that he is eminent!)' qualified to be a role model for die y6J;mf;ergene-ration to emulate. By the end of 1990, he had to his credit 91 papers in StelJJlrSlructllre and Stellar atmosphere,f. 80 papers in Radiative transfer and negative ion of hydrogen, 71 papers in Stochastic, ,ftatisticql hydromagnetic problems in ph}'sics and a,ftrono"9., 11 papers in Pla.fma Physics, 43 papers in Hydromagnetic and ~}.droa:rnamic ,S"tabiJjty,42 papers in Tensor-virial theorem, 83 papers in Relativi,ftic a.ftrophy,fic.f, 61 papers in Malhematical theory. of Black hole,f and coUoiding waves, and 19 papers of genual interest. The higb~t Collaboration Coefficient \\'as 0.5 during 1983-87. Producti"it." coefficient ,,.as 0.46. The mean Synchronous self citation rate in his publications \\.as 24.44. Publication densi~. \\.as 7.37 and Publication concentration \\.as 4.34. Ke.}.word.f/De,fcriptors: Biobibliometrics; Scientometrics; Bibliome'trics; Collaboration; lndn.idual Scientist; Scientometric portrait; Sociolo~' of Science, Histor:. of St.-iencc. 1. Introduction his three undergraduate years at the Institute for Subrahmanvan Chandrasekhar ,,.as born in Theoretisk Fysik in Copenhagen.
    [Show full text]
  • TERMODYNAMIK En Kort Historik Christoffer Norberg
    ISRN LUTMDN/TMHP-08/3032-SE ISSN 0282-1990 Institutionen f¨or Energivetenskaper TERMODYNAMIK en kort historik Christoffer Norberg Joules skovelanordning fr˚an 1845/7 f¨or att best¨amma den mekaniska v¨armeekvivalenten. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. 140 (1850). januari 2008 F¨orord Denna skrift g¨or inga anspr˚ak p˚aatt vara komplett eller utt¨ommande. D¨aremot har jag i m¨ojligaste m˚an f¨ors¨okt vara korrekt n¨ar det g¨aller ˚artal, biografiska data och prioritet av originalarbeten. F¨or en mer utt¨ommande beskrivning (fram till 1800-talets slut) re- kommenderas From Watt to Clausius av Donald Cardwell ([5]). Kommentarer och f¨orslag till korrigeringar emottages tacksamt. Portr¨att ¨ar huvudsakligen h¨amtade fr˚an Internet samt [2, 6, 25, 28, 20, 27], biografiska data v¨asentligen ur [1, 28, 7, 12, 21, 26, 30] och originalreferenser mestadels ur bibliotekss¨okningar, tillg¨angliga tidskrifter inom LU-n¨atet samt [23, 30]. 8 januari 20081 Christoffer Norberg Tel. 046-2228606 Christoff[email protected] Levnads˚ar f¨or 35 pionj¨arer inom termodynamikens historiska utveckling. Tjocka linjer motsvarar ˚aldern 20–65 ˚ar. “But although, as a matter of history, statistical mechanics owes its origin to investigations in thermodynamics, it seems eminently worthy of an independent development, both on account of the elegance and simplicity of its principles, and because it yields new results and places old truths in a new light in departments quite outside of thermodynamics.” Willard Gibbs 1Sedan tryckningen fr˚an januari 2008 har det gjorts ett par uppdateringar av biografiska data, liksom sm¨arre justeringar och till¨agg i texten samt i den bibliografiska delen; 15 december 2013.
    [Show full text]
  • Ideal Gas Law
    ATMO 551a Fall 2010 Ideal gas law The ideal gas law is one of the great achievements of Thermodynamics. It relates the pressure, temperature and density of gases. It is VERY close to true for typical atmospheric conditions. It assumes the molecules interact like billiard balls. For water vapor with its large permanent electric dipole moment, it does not quite behave as an ideal gas but even it is close. The microscopic version of the ideal gas law is P = n kB T where P is pressure in pascals, n is the number density of the gas in molecules per cubic meter -23 and T is the temperature in Kelvin and kB is Boltzmann’s constant = 1.38x10 J/K. For typical atmospheric conditions, n is huge and kB is always tiny. So there is a different “macroscopic” version of the ideal gas law with numbers that are easier to work with. Avogadro’s number is the number of molecules in a “mole” where a mole is defined such that 1 mole of a molecules has a mass in grams equal to the mass of an individual molecule in atomic mass units (amu). For example, 1 mole of hydrogen atoms has a mass of ~1 gram. The number 23 -1 of molecules in a mole is given by Avogadro’s number, NA = 6.02214179(30)×10 mol . We multiply and divide the first equation by NA to get P = n kB T = n/NA kBNA T = N R* T where N is the number of moles per unit volume = n/NA and R* is the ideal gas constant = kB NA.
    [Show full text]