DOCSLIB.ORG

Energy Efficiency Lighting Hearing Committee On

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Energy Efficiency Lighting Hearing Committee On S. HRG. 110–195 ENERGY EFFICIENCY LIGHTING HEARING BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES UNITED STATES SENATE ONE HUNDRED TENTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION TO RECEIVE TESTIMONY ON THE STATUS OF ENERGY EFFICIENT LIGHT- ING TECHNOLOGIES AND ON S. 2017, THE ENERGY EFFICIENT LIGHT- ING FOR A BRIGHTER TOMORROW ACT SEPTEMBER 12, 2007 ( Printed for the use of the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 39–385 PDF WASHINGTON : 2007 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2104 Mail: Stop IDCC, Washington, DC 20402–0001 VerDate 0ct 09 2002 11:58 Feb 20, 2008 Jkt 040443 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 5011 Sfmt 5011 G:\DOCS\39385.XXX SENERGY2 PsN: MONICA COMMITTEE ON ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES JEFF BINGAMAN, New Mexico, Chairman DANIEL K. AKAKA, Hawaii PETE V. DOMENICI, New Mexico BYRON L. DORGAN, North Dakota LARRY E. CRAIG, Idaho RON WYDEN, Oregon LISA MURKOWSKI, Alaska TIM JOHNSON, South Dakota RICHARD BURR, North Carolina MARY L. LANDRIEU, Louisiana JIM DEMINT, South Carolina MARIA CANTWELL, Washington BOB CORKER, Tennessee KEN SALAZAR, Colorado JOHN BARRASSO, Wyoming ROBERT MENENDEZ, New Jersey JEFF SESSIONS, Alabama BLANCHE L. LINCOLN, Arkansas GORDON H. SMITH, Oregon BERNARD SANDERS, Vermont JIM BUNNING, Kentucky JON TESTER, Montana MEL MARTINEZ, Florida ROBERT M. SIMON, Staff Director SAM E. FOWLER, Chief Counsel FRANK MACCHIAROLA, Republican Staff Director JUDITH K. PENSABENE, Republican Chief Counsel (II) VerDate 0ct 09 2002 11:58 Feb 20, 2008 Jkt 040443 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 5904 Sfmt 5904 G:\DOCS\39385.XXX SENERGY2 PsN: MONICA C O N T E N T S STATEMENTS Page Bingaman, Hon. Jeff, U.S. Senator From New Mexico ........................................ 1 California Energy Commission ............................................................................... 58 Domenici, Hon. Pete V., U.S. Senator From New Mexico .................................... 6 Harman, Hon. Jane, U.S. Representative From California ................................. 3 Karsner, Alexander, Assistant Secretary, Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Department of Energy ........................................................................... 9 Nadel, Steven, Executive Director, American Council for an Energy Efficient Economy ................................................................................................................ 40 Pitsor, Kyle, Vice President, National Electrical Manufacturers Association, Rosslyn, VA ........................................................................................................... 36 Salazar, Hon. Ken, U.S. Senator From Colorado .................................................. 2 Sanders, Hon. Bernard, U.S. Senator From Vermont .......................................... 2 Upton, Hon. Fred, U.S. Representative From Michigan ...................................... 7 Waide, Paul, Senior Policy Analyst, Energy Efficiency and Environmental Division International Energy Agency, Paris, France ...................................... 23 APPENDIX Responses to additional questions .......................................................................... 59 (III) VerDate 0ct 09 2002 11:58 Feb 20, 2008 Jkt 040443 PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 5904 Sfmt 5904 G:\DOCS\39385.XXX SENERGY2 PsN: MONICA VerDate 0ct 09 2002 11:58 Feb 20, 2008 Jkt 040443 PO 00000 Frm 00004 Fmt 5904 Sfmt 5904 G:\DOCS\39385.XXX SENERGY2 PsN: MONICA ENERGY EFFICIENCY LIGHTING WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 12, 2007 U.S. SENATE, COMMITTEE ON ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES, Washington, DC. The committee met, pursuant to notice, at 10:32 a.m. in room SD–366, Dirksen Senate Office Building, Hon. Jeff Bingaman, chairman, presiding. OPENING STATEMENT OF HON. JEFF BINGAMAN, U.S. SENATOR FROM NEW MEXICO The CHAIRMAN. Let’s go ahead and start the hearing. I apologize to everybody for the lateness of our beginning time. The Senate was having votes. I understand Senator Domenici and Senator Murkowski are on their way, but in order to expedite things, let me very briefly give a statement, and then call on our two Mem- bers of Congress to make their statements. They represent our first panel today. This is a hearing to take testimony of S. 2017, the Energy Effi- cient Lighting for a Brighter Tomorrow Act, and to review the sta- tus of emerging energy efficiency lighting technologies. S. 2017 establishes a process to begin the transformation of the U.S. lighting market by phasing out inefficient incandescent lamps and replacing them with more efficient technologies. In June, the Senate passed an energy bill. We included in there a sense of the Senate, Section 214, that said, ‘‘a provision that the Senate should pass a set of mandatory technology-neutral standards to establish energy efficient performance targets for lighting products, ensuring that the standards become effective within the next 10 years, en- sure that replacement lamps will provide consumers with the same quantity of light, while using significantly less energy, ensuring that consumers will continue to have multiple product choice, and work on measures than can assist consumers and businesses in making the transition to more efficient lighting.’’ S. 2017 was introduced last week with Senator Stevens, Carper, Snowe, Landrieu, and myself. It’s intended to meet the require- ments of that sense of the Senate provision. It was developed with the active participation of energy efficiency advocates and lighting manufactures. The House energy bill, S. 3221, includes a lighting provision with similar goals. These are complex provisions and I believe the witnesses are well-equipped to talk to us about some of the details of them. (1) VerDate 0ct 09 2002 11:58 Feb 20, 2008 Jkt 040443 PO 00000 Frm 00005 Fmt 6633 Sfmt 6633 G:\DOCS\39385.XXX SENERGY2 PsN: MONICA 2 This morning, we will first hear from Representative Jane Har- man and from Representative Fred Upton, who are the authors of the House provision. Following the House members, Assistant Sec- retary Karsner will provide the Administration’s view on the legis- lation and the status of the new energy efficient lighting tech- nologies. Finally we’ll hear from a panel of experts on lighting efficiency. I’m very pleased that Dr. Paul Waide is able to join us from the IEA in Paris. He is the resident expert on lighting for the OECD and he can place our efforts within the global context. Kyle Pitsor of NEMA, will represent the views of the U.S. lighting manufactur- ers. Steve Nadel of ACEEE will testify on behalf of several energy efficiency advocacy groups. [The prepared statement of Senator Salazar follows:] PREPARED STATEMENT OF HON. KEN SALAZAR, U.S. SENATOR FROM COLORADO Thank you Mr. Chairman and Ranking Member Domenici for holding today’s hearing on S. 2107, the Energy Efficient Lighting for a Brighter Tomorrow Act. I want to thank Chairman Bingaman for the work he and his staff did to introduce S. 2107. I also want to thank our witnesses for their time today, and our inter- national expert who traveled so far to be with us. The lighting we use in our homes today has changed little since the early 1900s. Most residential lighting is from inefficient incandescent light bulbs. It is estimated there are over 3 billion incandescent light bulbs in use in homes across our country today, and almost a billion incandescent light bulbs used in businesses. Incandes- cent light bulbs are energy inefficient because only about 10% of the power used by an incandescent light bulb goes to producing light, and the remaining 90% of the power is given off as heat. Improved lighting technology exists today that allows us to get the same amount of light using far less energy. By simply switching to a more energy-efficient com- pact fluorescent light bulb, we can use almost 75 percent less energy, and the light bulb will last ten times longer than the traditional incandescent light bulb. Energy efficiency is the quickest, cheapest, and cleanest way to extend our coun- try’s energy supplies. To date, most of our country’s efforts to encourage people to switch to more energy efficient lighting have been through voluntary programs like the Change a Light, Change the World campaign lead by the Environmental Protec- tion Agency. However, we can and must do more to speed the transition to more energy-effi- cient lighting technology. Based on Department of Energy data, 765 billion kWh of energy is used annually in the U.S. by lighting systems. Approximately 30% of the energy consumed in an office building is from lighting use, and 5–10% of residential energy use is for lighting. It is estimated that consumers and businesses spend ap- proximately $58 billion annually for lighting. Far too much energy is consumed today for lighting, especially in light of the fact that much more energy-efficient lighting exists today. While we do have the know-how to transition to more efficient lighting, there will be challenges for industry. I look forward to hearing from our witnesses today to learn how we can best make this transition to more efficient lighting. Changing the world does start with simple actions. I want to thank again Chair- man Bingaman and Ranking Member Domenici for holding today’s hearing on this important bill to change the way our nation lights its homes and businesses. [The prepared statement of Senator Sanders follows:] PREPARED STATEMENT OF HON. BERNARD SANDERS, U.S. SENATOR FROM VERMONT Chairman Bingaman,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Article Soot Photometer Using Supervised Machine Learning
    Atmos. Meas. Tech., 12, 3885–3906, 2019 https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-3885-2019 © Author(s) 2019. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Classification of iron oxide aerosols by a single particle soot photometer using supervised machine learning Kara D. Lamb1,2 1Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO, USA 2NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory Chemical Sciences Division, Boulder, CO, USA Correspondence: Kara D. Lamb ([email protected]) Received: 15 March 2019 – Discussion started: 22 March 2019 Revised: 20 June 2019 – Accepted: 21 June 2019 – Published: 15 July 2019 Abstract. Single particle soot photometers (SP2) use laser- each class are compared with the true class for those particles induced incandescence to detect aerosols on a single particle to estimate generalization performance. While the specific basis. SP2s that have been modified to provide greater spec- class approach performed well for rBC and Fe3O4 (≥ 99 % tral contrast between their narrow and broad-band incandes- of these aerosols are correctly identified), its classification of cent detectors have previously been used to characterize both other aerosol types is significantly worse (only 47 %–66 % refractory black carbon (rBC) and light-absorbing metallic of other particles are correctly identified). Using the broader aerosols, including iron oxides (FeOx). However, single par- class approach, we find a classification accuracy of 99 % for ticles cannot be unambiguously identified from their incan- FeOx samples measured in the laboratory. The method al- descent peak height (a function of particle mass) and color lows for classification of FeOx as anthropogenic or dust-like ratio (a measure of blackbody temperature) alone.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction 1
    1 1 Introduction . ex arte calcinati, et illuminato aeri [ . properly calcinated, and illuminated seu solis radiis, seu fl ammae either by sunlight or fl ames, they conceive fulgoribus expositi, lucem inde sine light from themselves without heat; . ] calore concipiunt in sese; . Licetus, 1640 (about the Bologna stone) 1.1 What Is Luminescence? The word luminescence, which comes from the Latin (lumen = light) was fi rst introduced as luminescenz by the physicist and science historian Eilhardt Wiede- mann in 1888, to describe “ all those phenomena of light which are not solely conditioned by the rise in temperature,” as opposed to incandescence. Lumines- cence is often considered as cold light whereas incandescence is hot light. Luminescence is more precisely defi ned as follows: spontaneous emission of radia- tion from an electronically excited species or from a vibrationally excited species not in thermal equilibrium with its environment. 1) The various types of lumines- cence are classifi ed according to the mode of excitation (see Table 1.1 ). Luminescent compounds can be of very different kinds: • Organic compounds : aromatic hydrocarbons (naphthalene, anthracene, phenan- threne, pyrene, perylene, porphyrins, phtalocyanins, etc.) and derivatives, dyes (fl uorescein, rhodamines, coumarins, oxazines), polyenes, diphenylpolyenes, some amino acids (tryptophan, tyrosine, phenylalanine), etc. + 3 + 3 + • Inorganic compounds : uranyl ion (UO 2 ), lanthanide ions (e.g., Eu , Tb ), doped glasses (e.g., with Nd, Mn, Ce, Sn, Cu, Ag), crystals (ZnS, CdS, ZnSe, CdSe, 3 + GaS, GaP, Al 2 O3 /Cr (ruby)), semiconductor nanocrystals (e.g., CdSe), metal clusters, carbon nanotubes and some fullerenes, etc. 1) Braslavsky , S. et al . ( 2007 ) Glossary of terms used in photochemistry , Pure Appl.
    [Show full text]
  • 2. Making Fires Burn Or Go out 1: Introduction to the Fire Triangle
    2. Making Fires Burn or Go Out 1: Introduction to the Fire Triangle Lesson Overview: In this activity, students describe and organize what they already know Subjects: Science, Mathematics, Writing, about fire so it fits into the conceptual model of Speaking and Listening, Health and the Fire Triangle. They examine the geometric Safety stability of a triangle and how that property Duration: one half-hour session applies to fire. Group size: Whole class. Students work in groups of 2-3. Lesson Goal: Increase students’ understanding of Setting: Indoors how fires burn and why they go out. Vocabulary: Fire Triangle, fuel, heat, ignition, oxygen, model Objectives: • Students can construct a triangle out of toothpicks and gumdrops, and can label its legs with the three components of the Fire Triangle. • Students can demonstrate that removing one side of the triangle makes it collapse. • Students can identify the component(s) of the Fire Triangle that are removed in various scenarios, and explain how this makes the fire go out. Standards: 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th CCSS Writing 2, 7, 8 2, 7, 8 2, 7, 10 2,7, 9, 10 2,7, 9, 10 Speaking/Listening 1, 2, 4, 6 1, 2, 4, 6 1, 2, 4, 6 1, 2, 4, 6 1, 2, 4, 6 1, 2, 3, 4, Language 1, 2, 4, 6 1, 2, 4, 6 6 1, 2, 3, 4, 6 1, 2, 3, 4, 6 MP.4, MP.4, MP.4, MP.4, Math MP.5 MP.5, MP.5 MP.5 MP.4, MP.5 Matter and Its PS1.A, NGSS Interactions PS1.B PS1.B From Molecules to Organisms: Structure/Processes LS1.C Engineering Design ETS1.B ETS1.B EEEGL Strand 1 A, B, C, E, F, G A, B, C, E, F, G Teacher Background: This activity explores the chemistry of combustion as described by a conceptual model called the Fire Triangle.
    [Show full text]
  • Biofluorescence
    Things That Glow In The Dark Classroom Activities That Explore Spectra and Fluorescence Linda Shore [email protected] “Hot Topics: Research Revelations from the Biotech Revolution” Saturday, April 19, 2008 Caltech-Exploratorium Learning Lab (CELL) Workshop Special Guest: Dr. Rusty Lansford, Senior Scientist and Instructor, Caltech Contents Exploring Spectra – Using a spectrascope to examine many different kinds of common continuous, emission, and absorption spectra. Luminescence – A complete description of many different examples of luminescence in the natural and engineered world. Exploratorium Teacher Institute Page 1 © 2008 Exploratorium, all rights reserved Exploring Spectra (by Paul Doherty and Linda Shore) Using a spectrometer The project Star spectrometer can be used to look at the spectra of many different sources. It is available from Learning Technologies, for under $20. Learning Technologies, Inc., 59 Walden St., Cambridge, MA 02140 You can also build your own spectroscope. http://www.exo.net/~pauld/activities/CDspectrometer/cdspectrometer.html Incandescent light An incandescent light has a continuous spectrum with all visible colors present. There are no bright lines and no dark lines in the spectrum. This is one of the most important spectra, a blackbody spectrum emitted by a hot object. The blackbody spectrum is a function of temperature, cooler objects emit redder light, hotter objects white or even bluish light. Fluorescent light The spectrum of a fluorescent light has bright lines and a continuous spectrum. The bright lines come from mercury gas inside the tube while the continuous spectrum comes from the phosphor coating lining the interior of the tube. Exploratorium Teacher Institute Page 2 © 2008 Exploratorium, all rights reserved CLF Light There is a new kind of fluorescent called a CFL (compact fluorescent lamp).
    [Show full text]
  • Exterior Lighting Guide for Federal Agencies
    EXTERIOR LIGHTING GUIDE FOR FederAL AgenCieS SPONSORS TABLE OF CONTENTS The U.S. Department of Energy, the Federal Energy Management Program, page 02 INTRODUctiON page 44 EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL), and the California Lighting Plasma Lighting page 04 REASONS FOR OUTDOOR Technology Center (CLTC) at the University of California, Davis helped fund and Networked Lighting LiGHtiNG RETROFitS create the Exterior Lighting Guide for Federal Agencies. Photovoltaic (PV) Lighting & Systems Energy Savings LBNL conducts extensive scientific research that impacts the national economy at Lowered Maintenance Costs page 48 EXTERIOR LiGHtiNG RETROFit & $1.6 billion a year. The Lab has created 12,000 jobs nationally and saved billions of Improved Visual Environment DESIGN BEST PRActicES dollars with its energy-efficient technologies. Appropriate Safety Measures New Lighting System Design Reduced Lighting Pollution & Light Trespass Lighting System Retrofit CLTC is a research, development, and demonstration facility whose mission is Lighting Design & Retrofit Elements page 14 EVALUAtiNG THE CURRENT to stimulate, facilitate, and accelerate the development and commercialization of Structure Lighting LIGHtiNG SYSTEM energy-efficient lighting and daylighting technologies. This is accomplished through Softscape Lighting Lighting Evaluation Basics technology development and demonstrations, as well as offering outreach and Hardscape Lighting Conducting a Lighting Audit education activities in partnership with utilities, lighting
    [Show full text]
  • Basic Physics of the Incandescent Lamp (Lightbulb) Dan Macisaac, Gary Kanner,Andgraydon Anderson
    Basic Physics of the Incandescent Lamp (Lightbulb) Dan MacIsaac, Gary Kanner,andGraydon Anderson ntil a little over a century ago, artifi- transferred to electronic excitations within the Ucial lighting was based on the emis- solid. The excited states are relieved by pho- sion of radiation brought about by burning tonic emission. When enough of the radiation fossil fuels—vegetable and animal oils, emitted is in the visible spectrum so that we waxes, and fats, with a wick to control the rate can see an object by its own visible light, we of burning. Light from coal gas and natural say it is incandescing. In a solid, there is a gas was a major development, along with the near-continuum of electron energy levels, realization that the higher the temperature of resulting in a continuous non-discrete spec- the material being burned, the whiter the color trum of radiation. and the greater the light output. But the inven- To emit visible light, a solid must be heat- tion of the incandescent electric lamp in the ed red hot to over 850 K. Compare this with Dan MacIsaac is an 1870s was quite unlike anything that had hap- the 6600 K average temperature of the Sun’s Assistant Professor of pened before. Modern lighting comes almost photosphere, which defines the color mixture Physics and Astronomy at entirely from electric light sources. In the of sunlight and the visible spectrum for our Northern Arizona University. United States, about a quarter of electrical eyes. It is currently impossible to match the He received B.Sc.
    [Show full text]
  • Photon Energy Upconversion Through Thermal Radiation with the Power Efficiency Reaching 16%
    ARTICLE Received 30 May 2014 | Accepted 27 Oct 2014 | Published 28 Nov 2014 DOI: 10.1038/ncomms6669 Photon energy upconversion through thermal radiation with the power efficiency reaching 16% Junxin Wang1,*, Tian Ming1,*,w, Zhao Jin1, Jianfang Wang1, Ling-Dong Sun2 & Chun-Hua Yan2 The efficiency of many solar energy conversion technologies is limited by their poor response to low-energy solar photons. One way for overcoming this limitation is to develop materials and methods that can efficiently convert low-energy photons into high-energy ones. Here we show that thermal radiation is an attractive route for photon energy upconversion, with efficiencies higher than those of state-of-the-art energy transfer upconversion under continuous wave laser excitation. A maximal power upconversion efficiency of 16% is 3 þ achieved on Yb -doped ZrO2. By examining various oxide samples doped with lanthanide or transition metal ions, we draw guidelines that materials with high melting points, low thermal conductivities and strong absorption to infrared light deliver high upconversion efficiencies. The feasibility of our upconversion approach is further demonstrated under concentrated sunlight excitation and continuous wave 976-nm laser excitation, where the upconverted white light is absorbed by Si solar cells to generate electricity and drive optical and electrical devices. 1 Department of Physics, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong SAR, China. 2 State Key Laboratory of Rare Earth Materials Chemistry and Applications, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China. * These authors contributed equally to this work. w Present address: Research Laboratory of Electronics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA.
    [Show full text]
  • Student Explorations of Quantum Effects in Leds and Luninescent Devices
    University of Northern Iowa UNI ScholarWorks Faculty Publications Faculty Work 3-2004 Student Explorations of Quantum Effects in LEDs and Luninescent Devices Lawrence Escalada N. Sanjay Rebekki Kansas State University See next page for additional authors Let us know how access to this document benefits ouy Copyright ©2004 Lawrence T. Escalada, N. Sanjay Rebello, and Dean A. Zollman. The copyright holder has granted permission for posting. Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.uni.edu/phy_facpub Part of the Physics Commons, and the Science and Mathematics Education Commons Recommended Citation Escalada, Lawrence; Rebekki, N. Sanjay; and Zollman, Dean A., "Student Explorations of Quantum Effects in LEDs and Luninescent Devices" (2004). Faculty Publications. 19. https://scholarworks.uni.edu/phy_facpub/19 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Work at UNI ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of UNI ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Authors Lawrence Escalada, N. Sanjay Rebekki, and Dean A. Zollman This article is available at UNI ScholarWorks: https://scholarworks.uni.edu/phy_facpub/19 Student Explorations of Quantum Effects in LEDs and Luminescent Devices Lawrence T. Escalada, N. Sanjay Rebello, and Dean A. Zollman Citation: The Physics Teacher 42, 173 (2004); View online: https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1664385 View Table of Contents: http://aapt.scitation.org/toc/pte/42/3 Published by the
    [Show full text]
  • Exploring Photoluminescence
    Name: Class: LUMINESCENCE Visual Quantum Mechanics It’s Cool Light! ACTIVITY 5 Exploring Photoluminescence Goal In the previous activity, we explored several types of luminescence and compared it with incandescence. In this activity, we will investigate luminescent materials that require light to emit light. These materials are called photoluminescent. In a dark room, open the black envelope labeled “A” assigned by your instructor that contains an object that has been placed in it overnight. Take the object out of the envelope. ? Does object “A” emit light? If it does, in the space provided below describe the emitted light. Turn on the lights and expose the object to the light. After a few seconds, turn off the lights. ? Does object “A” seem to emit light when the lights are on? ? Now, turn the light off again. Does light come from object “A” ? If it does, in the space provided below describe the characteristics of the emitted light. Photoluminescence, unlike the other types of luminescence, requires light in order to emit light. As a result, the chart used in the first activity to identify the different types of luminescence (Figure 1-3) needs to be expanded to include Figure 5-1 illustrated on the following page. Kansas State University @2001, Physics Education Research Group, Kansas State University. Visual Quantum Mechanics is supported by the National Science Foundation under grants ESI 945782 and DUE 965288. Opinions expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily of the Foundation. 5-1 Luminescence ENERGY: Light photoluminescence object glows after light is removed yes no phosphorescence fluorescence Figure 5-1: Photoluminescence Addition to Luminescence Chart According to Figure 5-1, a photoluminescent object emits light or glows as a result of shining light on the object.
    [Show full text]
  • Illumination Fundamentals
    Illumination Fundamentals The LRC wishes to thank Optical Research Associates for funding this booklet to promote basic understanding of the science of light and illumination. Project Coordinator: John Van Derlofske Author: Alma E. F. Taylor Graphics: Julie Bailey and James Gross Layout: Susan J. Sechrist Cover Design: James Gross Technical Reviewers: Dr. Mark Rea and Dr. John Van Derlofske of the Lighting Research Center; Dr. William Cassarly and Stuart David of Optical Research Associates. Table 2.1 and Figures 2-3 and 2-5 are from Physics for Scientists and Engineers, copyright (c) 1990 by Raymond A. Serway, reproduced by permission of Harcourt, Inc. No portion of this publication or the information contained herein may be duplicated or excerpted in any way in other publications, databases, or any other medium without express written permission of the publisher. Making copies of all or part of this publication for any purpose other than for undistributed personal use is a violation of United States copyright laws. © 2000 Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute. All rights reserved. Illumination Fundamentals 3 Contents 1. Light and Electromagnetic Radiation ...................................... 7 1.1. What is Light? ................................................................... 7 1.2. The “Visible” Spectrum .................................................... 8 1.3. Ultraviolet Radiation ........................................................ 8 1.4. Infrared Radiation ............................................................ 8 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Study of Museum Lighting and Design
    STUDY OF MUSEUM LIGHTING AND DESIGN Approved: ____________________________ Dr. Heather C. Galloway Director, University Honors Program Approved: ____________________________ Dr. Hegde Department of Family Consumer Science Supervising Professor STUDY OF MUSEUM LIGHTING AND DESIGN HONORS THESIS Presented to the Honors Committee of Texas State University-San Marcos In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For Graduation in the University Honors Program By Elizabeth Gay Hunt San Marcos, Texas May 2009 STUDY OF MUSEUM LIGHTING AND DESIGN ABSTRACT A museum is a place to discover, explore and learn about the past, present and future of creativity, as well as history. Lighting plays a significant role in developing interaction between humans and museum artifacts in one defined space. " Museums are places where lighting design is critical to the overall experience”(Lowe,43, 2009). Lighting is essential for human interaction in a space. Technical illumination research lays a foundation to conduct analysis in a variety of museums. This research component is significant to understand the complexity and various facets of overall museum lighting design. This study evaluates both the quantitative and qualitative aspects of lighting design in four museums. Psychological, physiological and experiential components are observed in these museums’ environments to analyze lighting design within its exhibits. My observations and knowledge gained by studying these museums help influence and enhance the design of the Cedar Hill Museum of History. 3 DEDICATION This Honor Thesis is dedicated in memory of my mother, Carolyn T. Hunt. She instilled in me the idea that we live a short time on Earth. She often said, “We are given talents that we must give back to the community and help others.” The Cedar Hill Museum of History lighting design is a reflection of how she contributed to the community of Cedar Hill and helped mold the community into what is today.
    [Show full text]
  • Illumination Engineering Basics
    Module 1 Illumination Engineering Basics Version 2 EE IIT, Kharagpur 1 Lesson 2 Radiation Version 2 EE IIT, Kharagpur 2 Instructional objectives 1. State the Visible Range of light. 2. State the range of light human eye responds to. 3. Define UV radiation. 4. Define IR radiation. 5. List the physical phenomenon employed in artificial lighting. 6. Define color temperature. Introduction Light is the Radiant Energy that provides visual sensation. It is similar to radiant heat. But has different frequencies and wavelengths. However, Visible Light – spans from 180nm to 700nm wavelength. It must be mentioned that human Eye responds from 380 (violet) to 700nm (red). This becomes necessary for us to understand the suitability of various types of sources of light. Red 700nm Sunlight Violet 380nm Fig. 1 Spectrum of sunlight when passed through a Prism Fig.1 shows how sunlight splits into various color bands spread over violet to red often termed vibgyor. Energy is spread over this spectrum from the sunlight. Fig. 2 shows the relative energy content of the solar radiation. While Fig. 3 shows the response of human eye to the solar radiation, which is maxima at about 550nm. (Corresponding to yellow green color). Relative Energy Germicidal Visible Spectrum Drying IR Heating Therauptic UV f < fred λ >λred X 380nm 800nm f > Fviolet Red λ < λ violet Violet λ 500 – 600nm Green Yellow Fig. 2 Spectral energy Content of sun light. Version 2 EE IIT, Kharagpur 3 Relative Luminosity Green 550nm 720nm 400nm Red Violet Wavelength λ Fig. 3 Luminosity Curve of Average Human This being the scenario of natural light, artificial sources are made to produce radiation close to this.
    [Show full text]