DOCSLIB.ORG

2017BRES0017.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

II Acknowledgements/Remerciements/Dankwoord First, I would like to thank my supervisors Karine Olu and Lénaïck Menot. Merci pour les discussions pendant ce travail. Merci pour le support et l’encouragement que vous m’avez donné pendant cette thèse. Merci pour les opportunités de présenter ce travail dans des différents congrès et d'y faire des rencontres. I am grateful to the rapporteurs, Anthony Grehan (NUIG) and Ellen Kenchington (Fisheries and Oceans Canada) as well as other members of the jury Annabelle Aish (Muséum National d'histoire Naturelle), Gérard Thouzeau (UBO) and Yves-Marie Paulet (UBO) for accepting to validate this work. I also would like to thank the members of my thesis committee/Comité de these: Jean-François Bourillet (Ifremer), Sophie Arnaud-Haond (Ifremer), Sebastien Rochette (Ifremer), Jérôme Paillet (Ifremer), Florence Cayocca (AAMP) and Veerle Huvenne (NOCS). Thank you for your help that was and is much appreciated. Merci beaucoup! Dank je wel! Merci à tous les membres de LEP. Un merci tout particulier à : Jozée et Pierre-Marie pour ces années au LEP ; Julie pour ton aide en cartographie ; Ivan and Bérengère for sharing an office and nice moments of laughter, discussion, tea breaks with chocolate and of course for the cactus (we are almost finished!); Eve-Julie pour ton patience et aide aux moments que j’ai eu besoin de quelques choses au CENTOB et d’autres laboratoires et merci pour les bons moments sur Moz1 ; Jean-Pierre pour ta participation aux campagnes d’Evhoe et la collecte des données imagerie que j’ai traitée ; Jean-Pierre (encore une fois) et Manu pour les séances de tri de poisson pendant Evhoe 2013 ; Marjo pour ton aide avec les questions d’anglais, etc. ; Alizé et Marion pour la confirmation des identifications des certaines espèces/morphotype ; Philippe R. pour ton aide avec les ordinateurs – la combinaison entre un ordinateur et moi n’était pas toujours bonne. Je voudrais remercier les chefs de missions et les équipages des N/O Pourquoi Pas ? Thalassa et Le Suroît pour les campagnes BobGeo, BobGeo 2, BobEco, Evhoe 2009-2013 et les équipes du ROV et SCAMPI qui ont collecté des images. Ces images pendant ces campagnes sont analysées pendant cette étude, si possible. Également, je voudrais remercier le chef de mission et les équipages de N/O L’Atalante et du Scampi pendant la campagne MOZ-01, que j’ai participé avec plaisir. In addition, I would like to thank the captain and crew of the RV James Cook and the crew of the ISIS ROV (NOCS) during the JC124-125-126 cruise in which I was happy to join. I would like to thank Veerle III Huvenne (NOCS) for the possibility to participate in this cruise as well as the other people in my shift and on board with who I had nice discussions and moments. Je voudrais remercier Bernard Le Cann pour ses patientes explications des courants dans le Golfe de Gascogne et Jean-François Bourillet pour la même patience en géologie. Merci à Brigitte Guillaumont qui m’a donné mon premier contrat à l’Ifremer qui aura finalement abouti à cette thèse. Merci à mes amis et ma belle-famille qui m’ont demandé comment ça va avec moi et la thèse et ceux qui m’ont aidé avec la thèse. Merci ! Ik wil ook graag mijn familie en vrienden, in het speciaal mijn ouders en mijn zussen Maaike en Kerry, bedanken voor hun steun die jullie mij hebben gegeven tijdens mijn promotieonderzoek. Dank je voor de interesse die jullie in mijn werk hebben getoond, zelfs als ik te diep en te lang over het onderwerp door bleef kletsen. Dank jullie wel! I am especially grateful to my partner Christophe. You have supported me until the end. Thank you for keeping up with all the mood swings that I had when I was speaking about my PhD. Thank you for listening to me and giving me your advice on anything (maps, photoshop/illustrator, etc.) when I needed it. IV Table of Contents Acknowledgements/Remerciements/Dankwoord ............................................................... III Table of Contents .................................................................................................................... V List of figures .......................................................................................................................... IX List of Tables ........................................................................................................................... XI Introduction .............................................................................................................................. 1 Introduction (version française) .............................................................................................. 3 Introduction (English version) ................................................................................................ 9 1. Cold-water corals as conservation targets ................................................................... 9 2. Submarine canyons as hosts for coral habitats .......................................................... 10 3. The project CoralFISH and data collection ............................................................... 11 4. Thesis objectives ........................................................................................................ 12 References ............................................................................................................................ 15 Chapter 1 Submarine canyons and cold-water corals at stake .......................................... 19 Résumé français .................................................................................................................... 21 Submarine canyons and cold-water corals at stake .............................................................. 29 1. Submarine canyons .................................................................................................... 29 1.1. Morphology ........................................................................................................ 30 1.2. Hydrodynamics and sedimentation processes .................................................... 31 1.3. Organic matter .................................................................................................... 34 2. Cold-water corals ....................................................................................................... 36 2.1. Scleractinians ..................................................................................................... 38 2.1.1. Biology ........................................................................................................ 38 2.1.2. Distribution ................................................................................................. 40 2.1.3. Environmental conditions ........................................................................... 43 2.1.4. Biodiversity of scleractinian reefs............................................................... 47 2.2. Antipatharians, gorgonians and sea pens ........................................................... 49 2.2.1. Biology ........................................................................................................ 49 2.2.2. Distribution ................................................................................................. 53 2.2.3. Environmental conditions ........................................................................... 55 2.2.4. Biodiversity ................................................................................................. 56 V 3. Anthropogenic impact ............................................................................................... 57 3.1. Litter ................................................................................................................... 57 3.2. Fisheries ............................................................................................................. 59 3.2.1. Bottom trawling .......................................................................................... 59 3.2.2. Long-lining ................................................................................................. 64 3.3. Oil and gas industry ............................................................................................ 64 3.4. Climate change ................................................................................................... 65 4. Conservation .............................................................................................................. 68 References ............................................................................................................................ 73 Chapter 2 The French Atlantic: Bay of Biscay .................................................................... 93 Résumé français .................................................................................................................... 95 The French Atlantic: Bay of Biscay ................................................................................... 101 1. Morphology ............................................................................................................. 101 2. Hydrodynamics and sedimentation ......................................................................... 103 3. Organic matter ......................................................................................................... 106 4. Cold-water corals ..................................................................................................... 107 4.1. Presence and distribution ................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Equinodermos Del Caribe Colombiano II: Echinoidea Y Holothuroidea Holothuroidea

    Equinodermos Del Caribe Colombiano II: Echinoidea Y Holothuroidea Holothuroidea

    Holothuroidea Echinoidea y Equinodermos del Caribe colombiano II: Echinoidea y Equinodermos del Caribe colombiano II: Holothuroidea Equinodermos del Caribe colombiano II: Echinoidea y Holothuroidea Autores Giomar Helena Borrero Pérez Milena Benavides Serrato Christian Michael Diaz Sanchez Revisores: Alejandra Martínez Melo Francisco Solís Marín Juan José Alvarado Figuras: Giomar Borrero, Christian Díaz y Milena Benavides. Fotografías: Andia Chaves-Fonnegra Angelica Rodriguez Rincón Francisco Armando Arias Isaza Christian Diaz Director General Erika Ortiz Gómez Giomar Borrero Javier Alarcón Jean Paul Zegarra Jesús Antonio Garay Tinoco Juan Felipe Lazarus Subdirector Coordinación de Luis Chasqui Investigaciones (SCI) Luis Mejía Milena Benavides Paul Tyler Southeastern Regional Taxonomic Center Sandra Rincón Cabal Sven Zea Subdirector Recursos y Apoyo a la Todd Haney Investigación (SRA) Valeria Pizarro Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution David A. Alonso Carvajal Fotografía de la portada: Christian Diaz. Coordinador Programa Biodiversidad y Fotografías contraportada: Christian Diaz, Luis Mejía, Juan Felipe Lazarus, Luis Chasqui. Ecosistemas Marinos (BEM) Mapas: Laboratorio de Sistemas de Información LabSIS-Invemar. Paula Cristina Sierra Correa Harold Mauricio Bejarano Coordinadora Programa Investigación para la Gestión Marina y Costera (GEZ) Cítese como: Borrero-Pérez G.H., M. Benavides-Serrato y C.M. Diaz-San- chez (2012) Equinodermos del Caribe colombiano II: Echi- noidea y Holothuroidea. Serie de Publicaciones Especiales Constanza Ricaurte Villota de Invemar No. 30. Santa Marta, 250 p. Coordinadora Programa Geociencias Marinas (GEO) ISBN 978-958-8448-52-7 Diseño y Diagramación: Franklin Restrepo Marín. Luisa Fernanda Espinosa Coordinadora Programa Calidad Ambiental Impresión: Marina (CAM) Marquillas S.A. Palabras clave: Equinodermos, Caribe, Colombia, Taxonomía, Biodiversidad, Mario Rueda Claves taxonómicas, Echinoidea, Holothuroidea.
  • Echinodermata: Echinoidea)Del Mar Caribe Colombiano Biota Colombiana, Vol

    Echinodermata: Echinoidea)Del Mar Caribe Colombiano Biota Colombiana, Vol

    Biota Colombiana ISSN: 0124-5376 [email protected] Instituto de Investigación de Recursos Biológicos "Alexander von Humboldt" Colombia Borrero Pérez, Giomar Helena; Solano, Oscar David; Benavides Serrato, Milena Lista revisada de los erizos(Echinodermata: Echinoidea)del Mar Caribe Colombiano Biota Colombiana, vol. 3, núm. 1, junio, 2002, pp. 141-148 Instituto de Investigación de Recursos Biológicos "Alexander von Humboldt" Bogotá, Colombia Disponible en: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=49103104 Cómo citar el artículo Número completo Sistema de Información Científica Más información del artículo Red de Revistas Científicas de América Latina, el Caribe, España y Portugal Página de la revista en redalyc.org Proyecto académico sin fines de lucro, desarrollado bajo la iniciativa de acceso abierto MoraBiota Colombiana & Orozco 3 (1) 141 - 148, 2002 Cestrum of Colombia -141 Lista revisada de los erizos (Echinodermata: Echinoidea) del Mar Caribe Colombiano Giomar Helena Borrero-Pérez1, Oscar David Solano2 y Milena Benavides-Serrato3 Instituto de Investigaciones Marinas y Costeras, INVEMAR, A.A. 1016. Cerro de Punta Betín. Santa Marta. Colombia 1Bióloga Marina. Museo de Historia Natural Marina de Colombia. INVEMAR. [email protected]. 2Biólogo Marino M Sc. Coordinador de la Línea de Investigación Biología de Ecosistemas y de la Oficina de Servicios Científicos. INVEMAR. odsolano@ invemar.org.co. 3Bióloga Marina. Museo de Historia Natural Marina de Colombia. INVEMAR. mbenavides@ invemar.org.co. Palabras Clave: Erizos, Echinoidea, Echinodermata, Caribe colombiano, Lista de especies. L os erizos son un grupo de invertebrados exclusiva- El inventario se ha complementado con registros realizados mente marinos que comprende unas 900 especies vivientes en Islas del Rosario, donde Caycedo (1979) colectó a distribuidas desde los polos hasta el Ecuador y desde la Lytechinus williamsi y Clypeaster rosaceus y en el Parque zona intermareal hasta profundidades mayores a 5000 m.
  • Echinoderm Research and Diversity in Latin America Juan José Alvarado Francisco Alonso Solís-Marín Editors

    Echinoderm Research and Diversity in Latin America Juan José Alvarado Francisco Alonso Solís-Marín Editors

    Echinoderm Research and Diversity in Latin America Juan José Alvarado Francisco Alonso Solís-Marín Editors Echinoderm Research and Diversity in Latin America 123 Editors Juan José Alvarado Francisco Alonso Solís-Marín Centro de Investigaciónes en Ciencias Instituto de Ciencias del Mar, y Limnologia del Mar y Limnologia Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México Universidad de Costa Rica México City San José Mexico Costa Rica ISBN 978-3-642-20050-2 ISBN 978-3-642-20051-9 (eBook) DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-20051-9 Springer Heidelberg New York Dordrecht London Library of Congress Control Number: 2012941234 Ó Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013 This work is subject to copyright. All rights are reserved by the Publisher, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed. Exempted from this legal reservation are brief excerpts in connection with reviews or scholarly analysis or material supplied specifically for the purpose of being entered and executed on a computer system, for exclusive use by the purchaser of the work. Duplication of this publication or parts thereof is permitted only under the provisions of the Copyright Law of the Publisher’s location, in its current version, and permission for use must always be obtained from Springer. Permissions for use may be obtained through RightsLink at the Copyright Clearance Center. Violations are liable to prosecution under the respective Copyright Law.

  • ATLAS Deliverable 3.2

    ATLAS Deliverable 3.2 Water masses controls on biodiversity and biogeography Project ATLAS acronym: Grant 678760 Agreement: Deliverable Deliverable 3.2 number: Work Package: WP3 Date of 28.02.2019 completion: Author: Lea‐Anne Henry (lead for D3.2), Patricia Puerta (alphabetical, all contributors are also authors) Sophie Arnaud‐Haond, Barbara Berx, Jordi Blasco, Marina Carreiro‐Silva, Laurence de Clippele, Carlos Domínguez‐Carrió, Alan Fox, Albert Fuster, José Manuel Gonzalez‐ Irusta, Konstantinos Georgoulas, Anthony Grehan, Cristina Gutiérrez‐ Zárate, Clare Johnson, Georgios Kazanidis, Francis Neat, Ellen Contributors Kenchington, Pablo Lozano, Guillem Mateu, Lenaick Menot, Christian Mohn, Telmo Morato, Ángela Mosquera, Francis Neat, Covadonga Orejas, Olga Reñones, Jesús Rivera, Murray Roberts, Alex Rogers, Steve Ross, José Luis Rueda, David Stirling, Karline Soetaert, Javier Urra, Johanne Vad, Dick van Oevelen, Pedro Vélez‐Belchí, Igor Yashayaev This project has received funding from the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 678760 (ATLAS). This output reflects only the author's view and the European Union cannot be held responsible for any use that may be made of the information contained therein. 1 Contents 1. Executive Summary ..................................................................................................................................... 3 2. Review: Influence of water masses on deep‐sea biodiversity and biogeography of the North Atlantic ........ 5 3. Case Studies

  • A Total-Evidence Dated Phylogeny of Echinoids and the Evolution of Body

    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.02.13.947796; this version posted February 13, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. 1 A Total-Evidence Dated Phylogeny of Echinoids and the Evolution of Body 2 Size across Adaptive Landscape 3 4 Nicolás Mongiardino Koch1* & Jeffrey R. Thompson2 5 1 Department of Geology & Geophysics, Yale University. 210 Whitney Ave., New Haven, CT 6 06511, USA 7 2 Research Department of Genetics, Evolution and Environment, University College London, 8 Darwin Building, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, UK 9 * Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]. Tel.: +1 (203) 432-3114. 10 Fax: +1 (203) 432-3134. 11 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.02.13.947796; this version posted February 13, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. MONGIARDINO KOCH & THOMPSON 12 Abstract 13 Several unique properties of echinoids (sea urchins) make them useful for exploring 14 macroevolutionary dynamics, including their remarkable fossil record that can be incorporated 15 into explicit phylogenetic hypotheses. However, this potential cannot be exploited without a 16 robust resolution of the echinoid tree of life. We revisit the phylogeny of crown group 17 Echinoidea using both the largest phylogenomic dataset compiled for the clade, as well as a 18 large-scale morphological matrix with a dense fossil sampling.
  • Bathyal Sea Urchins of the Bahamas, with Notes on Covering Behavior in Deep Sea Echinoids (Echinodermata: Echinoidea)

    Bathyal Sea Urchins of the Bahamas, with Notes on Covering Behavior in Deep Sea Echinoids (Echinodermata: Echinoidea)

    Deep-Sea Research II 92 (2013) 207–213 Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect Deep-Sea Research II journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/dsr2 Bathyal sea urchins of the Bahamas, with notes on covering behavior in deep sea echinoids (Echinodermata: Echinoidea) David L. Pawson n, Doris J. Pawson National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, WA DC 20013-7012, USA article info abstract Available online 24 January 2013 In a survey of the bathyal echinoderms of the Bahama Islands region using manned submersibles, Keywords: approximately 200 species of echinoderms were encountered and documented; 33 species were Echinodermata echinoids, most of them widespread in the general Caribbean area. Three species were found to exhibit Echinoidea covering behavior, the piling of debris on the upper surface of the body. Active covering is common in at Bathyal least 20 species of shallow-water echinoids, but it has been reliably documented previously only once Covering in deep-sea habitats. Images of covered deep-sea species, and other species of related interest, are Bahamas provided. Some of the reasons adduced in the past for covering in shallow-water species, such as Caribbean reduction of incident light intensity, physical camouflage, ballast in turbulent water, protection from desiccation, presumably do not apply in bathyal species. The main reasons for covering in deep, dark, environments are as yet unknown. Some covering behavior in the deep sea may be related to protection of the genital pores, ocular plates, or madreporite. Covering in some deep-sea species may also be merely a tactile reflex action, as some authors have suggested for shallow-water species.
  • Abejas Euglosinas (Hymenoptera: Apidae) De La Región Neotropical: Listado De Especies Con Notas Sobre Su Biología

    Abejas Euglosinas (Hymenoptera: Apidae) De La Región Neotropical: Listado De Especies Con Notas Sobre Su Biología

    BiotaRamírez, Colombiana Dressler 3 & (1) Ospina 7 - 118, 2002 Neotropical euglossine bees -7 Abejas euglosinas (Hymenoptera: Apidae) de la Región Neotropical: Listado de especies con notas sobre su biología Santiago Ramírez1, Robert L. Dressler2 y Mónica Ospina3 1Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, 26 Oxford st., Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138. [email protected] 221305 NW 86th Ave. Micanopy, Fl. 32667. [email protected] 3Instituto de Investigación de Recursos Biológicos Alexander von Humboldt, Apartado Aéreo 8693, Bogotá D.C. – Colombia. [email protected] Palabras Clave: Euglossini, polinización de orquídeas, abejas de las orquídeas, Neotrópico, lista de especies A través de numerosas investigaciones, realizadas general en considerar la tribu Euglossini como grupo durante los últimos 40 años, varios aspectos sobre la biolo- monofilético (Kimsey 1982, 1987, Michener 1990, Engel 1999) gía de las abejas euglosinas han sido investigados intensa- sin embargo la posición filogenética de la tribu dentro del mente. Gracias a éste inusual interés se ha acumulado una grupo de abejas corbiculadas (Apinae) es incierta (Winston gran cantidad de información que hasta el momento perma- & Michener 1977, Kimsey 1987, Engel 1999, Cameron & nece dispersa; pues solo se han producido dos revisiones Mardulyn 2001 y referencias allí incluidas) al mismo tiempo parciales sobre éste grupo de abejas (Zucchi et al. 1969b, que las relaciones filogenéticas entre los géneros de la tri- Dressler 1982d) y desde ese entonces se han realizado nu- bu no son, aún, del todo claras (Kimsey 1982, 1987, Michener merosos trabajos adicionales. Por ésta razón se hace inmi- 1990, Engel 1999, Cameron & Mardulyn 2001).
  • Guia Interpretativa. Inventario Español De

    Guia Interpretativa. Inventario Español De

    INVENTARIO ESPAÑOL DE HÁBITATS y ESPECIES MARINOS GUÍA INTERpretativA: INVENTARIO ESPAÑOL DE HÁBITATS MARINOS José Templado, Enric Ballesteros, Ibon Galparsoro, Ángel Borja, Alberto Serrano, Laura Martín y Alberto Brito Madrid, 2012 DIRECCIÓN TÉCNICA DEL PROYECTO Javier Pantoja Trigueros, Antonio Fernández y García de Vinuesa Ministerio de Agricultura, Alimentación y Medio Ambiente Secretaría de Estado de Medio Ambiente. Dirección General de Sostenibilidad de la Costa y del Mar División para la Protección del Mar Blanca Ruiz Franco Ministerio de Agricultura, Alimentación y Medio Ambiente Secretaría de Estado de Medio Ambiente. Dirección General de Calidad y Evaluación Ambiental y Medio Natural Subdirección General de Medio Natural AUTORES José Templado González Laura Martín García CSIC - Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales Reserva Mundial de la Biosfera La Palma Enric Ballesteros Sagarra Alberto Serrano López CSIC - Centro de Estudios Avanzados de Blanes IEO - Centro Oceanográfico de Santander Alberto Brito Hernández AUTORES FOTOGRAFÍA PORTADA Universidad de La Laguna Ángel Borja Yerro Óscar Monterroso Hoyos Azti - Tecnalia Óscar Ocaña Vicente Ibon Galparsoro Iza Azti - Tecnalia REALIZACIÓN Y PRODUCCIÓN TRAGSATEC Gerencia de Asuntos Marítimos y del Litoral Subdirección de Pesca y Asuntos Marítimos MINISTERIO DE AGRICULTURA, ALIMENTACIÓN Y MEDIO AMBIENTE Edita: Distribución y venta: © Ministerio de Agricultura, Alimentación y Medio Paseo de la Infanta Isabel,1 Ambiente Secretaría General Técnica 28014 Madrid Centro de Publicaciones Teléfono:91 347 55 41 Fax:91 347 57 22 Diseño y maquetación: TRAGSATEC .S.A Pza. San Juan de la Cruz, s/n 28003 Madrid Impresión y encuadernación: Teléfono: 91 597 61 87 Editorial MIC Fax : 91 597 61 86 NIPO: 280-12-231-7 (papel) NIPO: 280-12-207-4 (en línea) Tienda virtual :www.magrama.es Depósito Legal: M-38394-2012 e-mail: [email protected] Catálogo Publicaciones de la Administración General del Estado: http://publicacionesoficiales.boe.es/ Datos técnicos: Formato:21 x 29.7 cm.
  • FAU Institutional Repository

    FAU Institutional Repository

    FAU Institutional Repository http://purl.fcla.edu/fau/fauir This paper was submitted by the faculty of FAU’s Harbor Branch Oceanographic Institute. Notice: © 1994 Columbia University Press. This manuscript is an author version with the final publication available and may be cited as: Young, C. M. (1994). The biology of external fertilization in deep-sea echinoderms. In C. M. Young & K. J. Eckelbarger (Eds.), Reproduction, larval biology, and recruitment of the deep-sea benthos (pp. 179-200). New York, NY: Columbia University Press. CHAPTER NINE The Biology of External Fertilization in Deep-Sea Echinoderms Craig M. Young ABSTRACT External fertilization by free spawning is much more common than internal fertilization among bathyal and abyssal echinoderms. A few species of echinoids may pseudocopulate by exchanging gametes in masses of mucus, which are retained on the adult spines. In deep-sea species of Aspidodiadema, elongate sperm nuclei may be an adaptation for swimming through the thick mucus that holds the eggs. Denny's (1988) model of fertilization success predicts that, all else being equal, external fertilization should be a more viable strategy on smooth sedi­ mentary bottoms in the deep sea than in the more turbulent flow condi­ tions found in shallow water. This is contrary to Thorson's Rule, which predicts greater incidence of brooding (and, by inference, internal fertil­ ization) with depth. Reproduction at low population density is some­ times achieved by echinoids, holothuroids, and ophiuroids by aggrega­ tion behaviors. Some species aggregate year round and others remain with spawning partners only during the reproductive season. Gametes of echinothuriids contain lipid reserves that apparently allow sperm to remain motile more than three times as long as typical shallow-water echinoid sperm.
  • Abstract Booklet.Pdf

    Abstract Booklet.Pdf

    Cover design: J. Carranza Photos (from left to right and top to bottom) courtesy of : 1) I. Frutos; 2) I. Frutos; 3) J.L. Cort; 4) J. Carranza; 5) ECOMARG project; 6) F. Sánchez; 7) J.M. Salinas; 8) A. Lavín et al.; 9) C. Fernández-Pato et al. XIII International Symposium on Oceanography of the Bay of Biscay. ISOBAY 13. Santander, SPAIN. 11–13 April 2012 XIII Symposium on Oceanography of the Bay of Biscay ISOBAY 13 11–13 April 2012. Santander, SPAIN. XIII International Symposium on Oceanography of the Bay of Biscay. ISOBAY 13. Santander, SPAIN. 11–13 April 2012 XIII International Symposium on Oceanography of the Bay of Biscay. ISOBAY 13. Santander, SPAIN. 11–13 April 2012 WELCOME TO ISOBAY 13 The Bay of Biscay is an area of the Atlantic Ocean enclosed by the Galician coast (NW Spain) and the Brittany coast (N France), with an extension almost half of the Iberian Peninsula and with a high proportion of the Spanish and French population living within less than 60 km from its coasts. As in all fields of the marine environment, it is subject to human pressures such as chronic pollution or accidental caused by maritime disasters, overfishing, alteration of marine habitats and the irrefutable consequences of climate change. However, from Brest to Vigo there is a large number of scientific institutions and organizations, distributed along this geographical environment, which are exploring and studying different aspects of its oceanographic phenomena: physical, chemical and biological, its flora and fauna, their ecosystems and resources. In summary this scientific potential allows to keep on investigating in all these disciplines for a better management of the functioning of coastal and deep water ecosystems in the Bay of Biscay.
  • Plio-Pleistocene Mediterranean Bathyal Echinoids: Evidence of Adaptation to Psychrospheric Conditions and Affinities with Atlantic Assemblages

    Plio-Pleistocene Mediterranean Bathyal Echinoids: Evidence of Adaptation to Psychrospheric Conditions and Affinities with Atlantic Assemblages

    Palaeontologia Electronica palaeo-electronica.org Plio-Pleistocene Mediterranean bathyal echinoids: evidence of adaptation to psychrospheric conditions and affinities with Atlantic assemblages Enrico Borghi, Vittorio Garilli, and Sergio Bonomo ABSTRACT Palaeontological evidences of autochthonous deep-water echinoids are so rare that the well-preserved assemblage herein described from the Plio-Pleistocene of Capo Milazzo (NE Sicily) provide an important opportunity to investigate the biodiver- sity of the bathyal echinoids in the Mediterranean late Cenozoic. The low diversity fauna studied is dominated by Cidaris margaritifera, Histocidaris sicula and Stirechinus scillae, which are species closely related to Recent echinoids today confined to the western Atlantic deep bottoms. The echinoid assemblages of Capo Milazzo and of the Plio-Pleistocene Argille Azzurre Formation (Italy) share a number of species, most of which are known also from shallow water Plio-Pleistocene deposits and the present- day Mediterranean; C. margaritifera is the only strictly bathyal echinoid that occurs in both formations. The palaeoecological study of these echinoids indicates an epibenthic way of life on muddy bottoms, in deep waters with psychrospheric conditions. The fol- lowing species from the Argille Azzurre are interpreted as strictly bathyal: Histocidaris rosaria, Schizaster braidensis and Schizaster ovatus (transferred into the genus Holanthus). The modern Mediterranean (impoverished) deep-water echinoid assem- blage has north-eastern Atlantic affinities and, with the exception of Holanthus expergi- tus, all the Mediterranean species found at bathyal depth are eurybathic, as they live also in shelf settings. In contrast, the bathyal echinoids of Capo Milazzo show stron- gest affinities with strictly deep-water western Atlantic species, particularly those of the Caribbean area.
  • A Pictorial Guide to the Epibenthic Megafauna of Orphan Knoll (Northwest Atlantic) Identified from in Situ Benthic Video Footage

    A Pictorial Guide to the Epibenthic Megafauna of Orphan Knoll (Northwest Atlantic) Identified from in Situ Benthic Video Footage

    A Pictorial Guide to the Epibenthic Megafauna of Orphan Knoll (northwest Atlantic) Identified from In Situ Benthic Video Footage Alannah Wudrick, Lindsay Beazley, Timothy Culwick, Claire Goodwin, Paco Cárdenas, Joana Xavier, and Ellen Kenchington Ocean and Ecosystem Sciences Division Maritimes Region Fisheries and Oceans Canada Bedford Institute of Oceanography PO Box 1006 Dartmouth, Nova Scotia Canada B2Y 4A2 2020 Canadian Technical Report of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 3375 1 Canadian Technical Report of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences Technical reports contain scientific and technical information that contributes to existing knowledge but which is not normally appropriate for primary literature. Technical reports are directed primarily toward a worldwide audience and have an international distribution. No restriction is placed on subject matter and the series reflects the broad interests and policies of Fisheries and Oceans Canada, namely, fisheries and aquatic sciences. Technical reports may be cited as full publications. The correct citation appears above the abstract of each report. Each report is abstracted in the data base Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts. Technical reports are produced regionally but are numbered nationally. Requests for individual reports will be filled by the issuing establishment listed on the front cover and title page. Numbers 1-456 in this series were issued as Technical Reports of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada. Numbers 457-714 were issued as Department of the Environment, Fisheries and Marine Service, Research and Development Directorate Technical Reports. Numbers 715-924 were issued as Department of Fisheries and Environment, Fisheries and Marine Service Technical Reports. The current series name was changed with report number 925.