DOCSLIB.ORG

Izvješće O Izvršenju Plana Upravljanja Vodnim Područjima 2016

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Izvješće O Izvršenju Plana Upravljanja Vodnim Područjima 2016 HRVATSKE VODE 2019. PLAN UPRAVLJANJA VODNIM PODRUČJIMA 2016. - 2021. IZVJEŠĆE O IZVRŠENJU PLANA UPRAVLJANJA VODNIM PODRUČJIMA 2016. - 2021. - Nacrt Na temelju članka 39., stavka 9. Zakona o vodama (Narodne novine, broj 66/19), Hrvatskom saboru se podnosi Izvješće o izvršenju Plana upravljanja vodnim područjima 2016. - 2021. (Narodne novine, broj 66/16) u razdoblju od 2016. do 2018. godine. Poglavlje 6. Izvješća je privremeno izvješće o postignutom napretku u provedbi programa mjera (Indikatori provedbe Plana) koje prema članku 42., stavku 3. Zakona o vodama Hrvatske vode dostavljaju Europskoj komisiji. Podaci o dokumentu Naslov: Izvješće o izvršenju Plana upravljanja vodnim područjima 2016. - 2021. - Nacrt Datum: Rujan/listopad, 2019. godine Izradile: HRVATSKE VODE Autori: mr.sc. Sanja Barbalić, dipl.ing.građ. dr.sc. Danko Biondić, dipl.ing.geol. mr.sc. Daria Čupić, dipl.ing.geol. Đorđa Medić, dipl.ing.kem. Tina Miholić, dipl.ing.biol. mr.sc. Valerija Musić, dipl.ing.biol. Marija Šikoronja, dipl.ing.biol. Sandra Šturlan Popović, dipl.ing.građ. Sadržaj Podaci o dokumentu ............................................................................................................................... 2 Sadržaj ..................................................................................................................................................... 3 Popis slika ................................................................................................................................................ 5 Popis tablica ............................................................................................................................................ 7 Sažetak .................................................................................................................................................. 11 1 POLAZIŠTE I PRAVNA OSNOVA ........................................................................................................ 13 2 PLAN UPRAVLJANJA VODNIM PODRUČJIMA .................................................................................. 13 3 PRISTUP IZRADI IZVJEŠĆA - SADRŽAJ IZVJEŠĆA ............................................................................... 14 4 PRELIMINARNA PROCJENA STANJA VODA ...................................................................................... 15 4.1 Površinske kopnene vode: rijeke, jezera i akumulacije ......................................................... 15 4.1.1 Površinske vode tekućice - rijeke ..................................................................................... 17 4.1.1.1 Ocjena ekološkog stanja na mjernim postajama rijeka ........................................ 17 4.1.1.2 Ocjena kemijskog stanja na mjernim postajama rijeka ........................................ 36 4.1.2 Površinske vode stajaćice - prirodna jezera ..................................................................... 46 4.1.2.1 Ocjena ekološkog stanja na mjernim postajama prirodnih jezera ...................... 46 4.1.2.2 Ocjena kemijskog stanja na mjernim postajama prirodnih jezera ...................... 54 4.1.3 Površinske vode stajaćice - akumulacije........................................................................... 57 4.1.3.1 Ocjena ekološkog stanja na mjernim postajama akumulacija ............................. 57 4.1.3.2 Ocjena kemijskog stanja na mjernim postajama akumulacija ............................. 67 4.2 Površinske prijelazne i priobalne vode .................................................................................. 71 4.2.1 Prijelazne vode ................................................................................................................. 73 4.2.1.1 Ocjena ekološkog stanja na vodnim tijelima prijelaznih voda ............................. 73 4.2.1.2 Ocjena kemijskog stanja na vodnim tijelima prijelaznih voda ............................. 79 4.2.2 Priobalne vode .................................................................................................................. 83 4.2.2.1 Ocjena ekološkog stanja na vodnim tijelima priobalnih voda ............................. 83 4.2.2.2 Ocjena kemijskog stanja na vodnim tijelima priobalnih voda ............................. 90 4.3 Podzemne vode ...................................................................................................................... 94 4.3.1 Ocjena kemijskog stanja podzemnih voda ....................................................................... 94 4.3.2 Ocjena količinskog stanja podzemnih voda.................................................................... 105 4.4 Zaštićena područja - područja posebne zaštite voda ........................................................... 110 5 UPRAVLJANJE STANJEM VODA - PROGRAM MJERA - OSVRT NA UČINKE PROVEDENIH AKTIVNOSTI IZ PROGRAMA MJERA ............................................................................................... 111 5.1 Mjere povrata troškova vodnih usluga i poticanje učinkovitog korištenja voda ................. 113 3 5.2 Mjere zaštite vode namijenjene za ljudsku potrošnju ......................................................... 121 5.3 Mjere kontrole zahvaćanja voda .......................................................................................... 133 5.4 Mjere kontrole prihranjivanja podzemnih voda .................................................................. 139 5.5 Mjere kontrole točkastih izvora onečišćenja ....................................................................... 141 5.6 Mjere kontrole raspršenih izvora onečišćenja ..................................................................... 158 5.7 Mjere kontrole i smanjenja hidromorfološkog opterećenja voda ....................................... 166 5.8 Mjere kontrole drugih značajnih utjecaja na stanje voda osobito na hidromorfološko stanje .................................................................................................................................... 171 5.9 Mjere zabrane direktnog ispuštanja onečišćenja u podzemne vode .................................. 171 5.10 Mjere eliminacije i smanjenja onečišćenja prioritetnim tvarima ........................................ 175 5.11 Mjere prevencije akcidentnih onečišćenja .......................................................................... 178 5.12 Dodatne mjere ..................................................................................................................... 187 5.12.1 Vode namijenjene za ljudsku potrošnju ili rezervirane za te namjene u budućnosti .... 187 5.12.2 Vode pogodne za život slatkovodnih riba i vode pogodne za školjkaše ......................... 187 5.12.3 Područja za kupanje i rekreaciju ..................................................................................... 189 5.12.4 Osjetljiva područja, slivovi osjetljivih područja .............................................................. 191 5.12.5 Područja podložna onečišćenju nitratima poljoprivrednog porijekla, ranjiva područja .......................................................................................................................... 192 5.12.6 Područja namijenjena zaštiti staništa ili vrsta gdje je održavanje ili poboljšanje stanja voda bitan elemenat njihove zaštite.................................................................... 193 5.12.7 Prijedlog nadopune Registra zaštićenih područja .......................................................... 210 5.13 Dopunske mjere ................................................................................................................... 212 5.13.1 Dopunska mjera usklađenja monitoringa ...................................................................... 212 5.13.2 Dopunske mjere kontrole točkastih i raspršenih izvora opterećenja ............................ 216 6 INDIKATORI PROVEDBE PLANA (prema Europskoj komisiji) ......................................................... 219 4 Popis slika Slika 1 Usporedba ocjene stanja prema biološkim elementima kakvoće na mjernim postajama rijeka ............................................................................................................... 18 Slika 2 Usporedba ocjene stanja prema fizikalno - kemijskim elementima kakvoće na mjernim postajama rijeka ................................................................................................. 21 Slika 3 Usporedba ocjene stanja prema fizikalno - kemijskim elementima kakvoće na mjernim postajama na kojima se prate isključivo fizikalno - kemijski pokazatelji ......................................................................................................................... 25 Slika 4 Usporedba ocjene stanja prema specifičnim onečišćujućim tvarima na mjernim postajama rijeka ................................................................................................. 27 Slika 5 Usporedba ocjene stanja prema hidromorfološkim elementima kakvoće u rijekama - srednja vrijednost (ocjena prema Metodologiji) ............................................. 31 Slika 6 Usporedba ocjene stanja prema hidromorfološkim elementima kakvoće u rijekama - najlošija vrijednost (prema Okvirnoj direktivi o vodama) ............................... 32 Slika 7 Usporedba ocjene stanja prema biološkim i hidromorfološkim elementima kakvoće u rijekama - srednja vrijednost i najlošija vrijednost .......................................... 34 Slika 8 Usporedba ocjene ekološkog stanja na mjernim postajama rijeka .................................. 36 Slika 9 Usporedba ocjene kemijskog
Load more

Recommended publications
  • FEEFHS Journal Volume VII No. 1-2 1999
    FEEFHS Quarterly A Journal of Central & Bast European Genealogical Studies FEEFHS Quarterly Volume 7, nos. 1-2 FEEFHS Quarterly Who, What and Why is FEEFHS? Tue Federation of East European Family History Societies Editor: Thomas K. Ecllund. [email protected] (FEEFHS) was founded in June 1992 by a small dedicated group Managing Editor: Joseph B. Everett. [email protected] of American and Canadian genealogists with diverse ethnic, reli- Contributing Editors: Shon Edwards gious, and national backgrounds. By the end of that year, eleven Daniel Schlyter societies bad accepted its concept as founding members. Each year Emily Schulz since then FEEFHS has doubled in size. FEEFHS nows represents nearly two hundred organizations as members from twenty-four FEEFHS Executive Council: states, five Canadian provinces, and fourteen countries. lt contin- 1998-1999 FEEFHS officers: ues to grow. President: John D. Movius, c/o FEEFHS (address listed below). About half of these are genealogy societies, others are multi-pur- [email protected] pose societies, surname associations, book or periodical publish- 1st Vice-president: Duncan Gardiner, C.G., 12961 Lake Ave., ers, archives, libraries, family history centers, on-line services, in- Lakewood, OH 44107-1533. [email protected] stitutions, e-mail genealogy list-servers, heraldry societies, and 2nd Vice-president: Laura Hanowski, c/o Saskatchewan Genealogi- other ethnic, religious, and national groups. FEEFHS includes or- cal Society, P.0. Box 1894, Regina, SK, Canada S4P 3EI ganizations representing all East or Central European groups that [email protected] have existing genealogy societies in North America and a growing 3rd Vice-president: Blanche Krbechek, 2041 Orkla Drive, group of worldwide organizations and individual members, from Minneapolis, MN 55427-3429.
    [Show full text]
  • ACTIVE FLOOD DEFENCE in CROATIA: Regulatory Framework, Roles & Responsibilities
    Workshop on Flood Risk Management measures & links to EU WFD November 11-12, 2015, Zagreb, Croatia ACTIVE FLOOD DEFENCE IN CROATIA: regulatory framework, roles & responsibilities Zoran Đurokovi ć, M.Sc.C.E. Croatian Waters Main Flood Protection Centre Head of Main Centre ∗ Climate change has intensified in recent years worldwide, including Croatia ∗ Extremely dry and wet periods have been alternating frequently in the last approximately 15 years ∗ Damage from extreme hydrological events is increasing ∗ “Average” or “normal” years are becoming increasingly rarer ∗ The frequency of high water waves and extreme water levels including floods is increasing ∗ There are almost no longer any rules concerning the occurrence of high water waves ∗ Forecasting climate models indicate increasingly frequent extreme climate events, both globally and locally ∗ Only in the last 15 years or so, the major part of the Croatian territory has experienced frequent extreme hydrological events which caused droughts in the years 2000, 2003, 2011 and 2012, but also floods in the years 2002, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2009, 2010, 2012, 2013, 2014 and 2015 ∗ Heavy damage is recorded, primarily in agriculture, but settlements, infrastructure and industrial facilities are also at risk ∗ Still, unlike in many other countries, major fatalities and disastrous damage in the urban areas have been avoided in Croatia ∗ Floods are natural phenomena which cannot be completely prevented. However, flood risks can be reduced to an acceptable level through constant development of flood
    [Show full text]
  • DIKTAS Country Report
    Protection and Sustainable Use of the Dinaric Karst Transboundary Aquifer System Country Report (Regional Aspect) - Croatia http://diktas.iwlearn.org Protection and Sustainable Use of the Dinaric Karst Transboundary Aquifer System Contents HYDROGEOLOGICAL OVERVIEW 1. Introduction 1.1. Project task and role of WG1 1.2. General on karst – term, distribution. Importance 1.3. Histrical review of karst researches 2. Physiography and climate 2.1. Geographic position and boundaries 2.2. Vegetation and land cover 2.3. Rainfall regime 2.4. Air temperature 2.5. Other climate elements 3. Hydrology 3.1. Hydrographic network 3.2. Stream-flow regime 3.3. Controlling streamflow – dams and reservoirs 4. Geological pattern 4.1. Paleogeography of Dinaric region 4.2. Dinaric Carbonate Platform (External Dinarides) - litostratigraphic units 4.3. Tectonic 5. Geomorphology and karstification 5.1. Karstification process 5.2. Karstic features 5.2.1. Surface karstic features 5.2.2. Potholes and caves 6. Aquifer systems 6.1. Aquifers classification and distribution 7. Groundwater basins 7.1. Regional groundwater direction 7.2. Grounwater bodies ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIO-ECONOMIC OVERVIEW 1. Administrative boundaries 2. Population and demography 3. Tourism 4. Land use 5. Sources of income 6. Agriculture 7. Roads 8. Industries 9. Mining sites 10. Solid waste disposal 11. Wastewater treatment Protection and Sustainable Use of the Dinaric Karst Transboundary Aquifer System 12. Dams and Hydropower Plants 13. Protected areas 14. Karstic caves 15. Groundwater dependent ecosystems 16. Water use 17. Surface water quality LEGAL AND INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK AND POLICY 1. Introduction 2. Updated report on legal, institutional and policy framework in Croatia 3.
    [Show full text]
  • FY 1999 FIRST QUARTER PROGRAM REPORT October 1,1998 to December 31,1998
    FY 1999 FIRST QUARTER PROGRAM REPORT October 1,1998 to December 31,1998 Strengthen Private Enterprises in War-Affected Areas of Croatia Agreement Number NIS-A-00-97-00026-00 Prepared for United States Agency for International Development Prepared by Univers~tyof Delaware 4 Kent Way Newark, DE 19716 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3 Sect~onI - FLAG VUKOVAR/OSIJEK (FORMER SECTOR EAST) 6 Sectlon I1 - FLAG DARUVAIUFORMER SECTOR WEST 14 Sectlon I11 - FLAG PETRINJAIFORMER SECTOR NORTH 2 1 Sect~onIV - FLAG KNIN / NORTHERN DALMATIA (FORMER SECTOR SOUTH) 26 ATTACHMENT A - POLICY ISSUES 3 0 ATTACHMENT B - OBROVAC LIVESTOCK MARKET FEASIBILITY STUDY 35 ATTACHMENT C - ECONOMIC PROFILE - EASTERN SLAVONIA AND BARANJA 45 ATTACHMENT D - ECONOMIC PROFILE - WESTERN SLAVONIA 87 ATTACHMENT E - ECONOMIC PROFILE - FORMER SECTOR NORTH 114 ATTACHMENT F - ECONOMIC PROFILE - FORMER SECTOR SOUTH 128 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY December 31, 1998 marked not only the end of the first quarter of Fiscal Year 1999 but the end of the first full busmess year for the University of Delaware's FLAG - Croatia program The balance of this report features activities and accomplishments of the first quarter of Fiscal Year 1999 However, within this executive summary key statistics will also be highlighted from 1998 FLAG Accompl~shments Despite extensive economic challenges, 1998 saw many FLAG clients improve Additionally, some clients simply fought successfully to maintain their market position, and a few began to fall due to economic pressures Dunng 1998, FLAG expanded its activities
    [Show full text]
  • Memorial of the Republic of Croatia
    INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE CASE CONCERNING THE APPLICATION OF THE CONVENTION ON THE PREVENTION AND PUNISHMENT OF THE CRIME OF GENOCIDE (CROATIA v. YUGOSLAVIA) MEMORIAL OF THE REPUBLIC OF CROATIA APPENDICES VOLUME 5 1 MARCH 2001 II III Contents Page Appendix 1 Chronology of Events, 1980-2000 1 Appendix 2 Video Tape Transcript 37 Appendix 3 Hate Speech: The Stimulation of Serbian Discontent and Eventual Incitement to Commit Genocide 45 Appendix 4 Testimonies of the Actors (Books and Memoirs) 73 4.1 Veljko Kadijević: “As I see the disintegration – An Army without a State” 4.2 Stipe Mesić: “How Yugoslavia was Brought Down” 4.3 Borisav Jović: “Last Days of the SFRY (Excerpts from a Diary)” Appendix 5a Serb Paramilitary Groups Active in Croatia (1991-95) 119 5b The “21st Volunteer Commando Task Force” of the “RSK Army” 129 Appendix 6 Prison Camps 141 Appendix 7 Damage to Cultural Monuments on Croatian Territory 163 Appendix 8 Personal Continuity, 1991-2001 363 IV APPENDIX 1 CHRONOLOGY OF EVENTS1 ABBREVIATIONS USED IN THE CHRONOLOGY BH Bosnia and Herzegovina CSCE Conference on Security and Co-operation in Europe CK SKJ Centralni komitet Saveza komunista Jugoslavije (Central Committee of the League of Communists of Yugoslavia) EC European Community EU European Union FRY Federal Republic of Yugoslavia HDZ Hrvatska demokratska zajednica (Croatian Democratic Union) HV Hrvatska vojska (Croatian Army) IMF International Monetary Fund JNA Jugoslavenska narodna armija (Yugoslav People’s Army) NAM Non-Aligned Movement NATO North Atlantic Treaty Organisation
    [Show full text]
  • Download This Article in PDF Format
    Knowl. Manag. Aquat. Ecosyst. 2021, 422, 13 Knowledge & © L. Raguž et al., Published by EDP Sciences 2021 Management of Aquatic https://doi.org/10.1051/kmae/2021011 Ecosystems Journal fully supported by Office www.kmae-journal.org français de la biodiversité RESEARCH PAPER First look into the evolutionary history, phylogeographic and population genetic structure of the Danube barbel in Croatia Lucija Raguž1,*, Ivana Buj1, Zoran Marčić1, Vatroslav Veble1, Lucija Ivić1, Davor Zanella1, Sven Horvatić1, Perica Mustafić1, Marko Ćaleta2 and Marija Sabolić3 1 Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, University of Zagreb, Rooseveltov trg 6, Zagreb 10000, Croatia 2 Faculty of Teacher Education, University of Zagreb, Savska cesta 77, Zagreb 10000, Croatia 3 Institute for Environment and Nature, Ministry of Economy and Sustainable Development, Radnička cesta 80, Zagreb 10000, Croatia Received: 19 November 2020 / Accepted: 17 February 2021 Abstract – The Danube barbel, Barbus balcanicus is small rheophilic freshwater fish, belonging to the genus Barbus which includes 23 species native to Europe. In Croatian watercourses, three members of the genus Barbus are found, B. balcanicus, B. barbus and B. plebejus, each occupying a specific ecological niche. This study examined cytochrome b (cyt b), a common genetic marker used to describe the structure and origin of fish populations to perform a phylogenetic reconstruction of the Danube barbel. Two methods of phylogenetic inference were used: maximum parsimony (MP) and maximum likelihood (ML), which yielded well supported trees of similar topology. The Median joining network (MJ) was generated and corroborated to show the divergence of three lineages of Barbus balcanicus on the Balkan Peninsula: Croatian, Serbian and Macedonian lineages that separated at the beginning of the Pleistocene.
    [Show full text]
  • National Reviews 1998 Croatia Technical Reports
    DANUBE POLLUTION REDUCTION PROGRAMME NATIONAL REVIEWS 1998 CROATIA TECHNICAL REPORTS Part A: Social and Economic Analysis Part B: Financing Mechanisms State Water Directorate State Directorate for the Protection of Nature and Environment in cooperation with the Programme Coordination Unit UNDP/GEF Assistance DANUBE POLLUTION REDUCTION PROGRAMME NATIONAL REVIEWS 1998 CROATIA TECHNICAL REPORTS Part A: Social and Economic Analysis Part B: Financing Mechanisms State Water Directorate State Directorate for the Protection of Nature and Environment in cooperation with the Programme Coordination Unit UNDP/GEF Assistance Preface The National Reviews were designed to produce basic data and information for the elaboration of the Pollution Reduction Programme (PRP), the Transboundary Analysis and the revision of the Strategic Action Plan of the International Commission for the Protection of the Danube River (ICPDR). Particular attention was also given to collect data and information for specific purposes concerning the development of the Danube Water Quality Model, the identification and evaluation of hot spots, the analysis of social and economic factors, the preparation of an investment portfolio and the development of financing mechanisms for the implementation of the ICPDR Action Plan. For the elaboration of the National Reviews, a team of national experts was recruited in each of the participating countries for a period of one to four months covering the following positions: Socio-economist with knowledge in population studies, Financial expert (preferably from the Ministry of Finance), Water Quality Data expert/information specialist, Water Engineering expert with knowledge in project development. Each of the experts had to organize his or her work under the supervision of the respective Country Programme Coordinator and with the guidance of a team of International Consultants.
    [Show full text]
  • Sediment Status Croatia
    Meteorological and Hydrological Service - Hydrology Department Sediment status Croatia Damir Bekić, Ph.D., Dipl.Ing., C.E. University of Zagreb, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Croatia Dijana Oskoruš, dipl.ing.geot. Meteorological and Hydrological Service of Republic Croatia Practical training course on sustainable sediment management with the Sava River Basin as a showcase 15.-18.10.2012, Zagreb, Hotel Panorama Presentation contents 1. Overview of the Croatian part of the Sava River Basin • Sava River Basin - General Flood protection schemes (historic and existing) Major water management structures River Sava waterway project • Sediment balance throughout the river system • River Sava morphological changes 2. Sediment monitoring • Monitoring of suspended sediment concentration • Monitoring of bed load transport • Evaluation of sediment quantity Damir Bekić, Ph.D., Dipl.Ing., C.E. University of Zagreb, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Croatia OVERVIEW OF THE CROATIAN PART OF THE SAVA BASIN 1. Sava River Basin - General . River Sava length 510 km . Sava River Basin 25,770 km2 Rivers in Sava Basin - Hydrology data (from Water Management Strategy, Croatian Waters, 2009) Sava River Basin - Altitude Altitude (m a.s.l.) Sava Basin - Average annual precipitation (from ISRBC Sava River Basin Analysis Report, Sept 2009) Surface erosion in Croatia (from Water Management Strategy, Croatian Waters, 2009) 1a. Flood protection . Protected and uprotected areas (Croatian Waters for ISRBC Sava River Basin Analysis Report, Sept 2009) Historical flood prone areas . Historical 100-year flood prone areas (Croatian Waters for ISRBC Sava River Basin Analysis Report, Sept 2009) Historical flooding in Zagreb . In the 1950-ies the city of Zagreb spread . Areas beyond the banks became more and more populated .
    [Show full text]
  • Information Sheet on Ramsar Wetlands (RIS) – 2009-2012 Version
    Information Sheet on Ramsar Wetlands (RIS) – 2009-2012 version Available for download from http://www.ramsar.org/ris/key_ris_index.htm. Categories approved by Recommendation 4.7 (1990), as amended by Resolution VIII.13 of the 8th Conference of the Contracting Parties (2002) and Resolutions IX.1 Annex B, IX.6, IX.21 and IX. 22 of the 9th Conference of the Contracting Parties (2005). Notes for compilers: 1. The RIS should be completed in accordance with the attached Explanatory Notes and Guidelines for completing the Information Sheet on Ramsar Wetlands. Compilers are strongly advised to read this guidance before filling in the RIS. 2. Further information and guidance in support of Ramsar site designations are provided in the Strategic Framework and guidelines for the future development of the List of Wetlands of International Importance (Ramsar Wise Use Handbook 14, 3rd edition). A 4th edition of the Handbook is in preparation and will be available in 2009. 3. Once completed, the RIS (and accompanying map(s)) should be submitted to the Ramsar Secretariat. Compilers should provide an electronic (MS Word) copy of the RIS and, where possible, digital copies of all maps. 1. Name and address of the compiler of this form: FOR OFFICE USE ONLY. DD MM YY Valerija Hima 0 0 1 Lonjsko Polje Nature Park Public Institution 3 2 9 3 H R 0 0 3 Krapje No. 16 9 HR – 44325 Krapje 3 Republic of Croatia Tel: +385 (0)44 611 190 Designation date Site Reference Number Fax: +385 (0)44 606 449 e-mail: [email protected] Ramona Topić State Institute for Nature Protection Trg Mažuranića 5 HR – 10000 Zagreb Republic of Croatia e-mail: [email protected] Jasminka Radović State Institute for Nature Protection Trg Mažuranića 5 HR – 10000 Zagreb Republic of Croatia e-mail: [email protected] Eugen Draganović Ministry of Environmental and Nature Protection Nature Protection Directorate Republike Austrije 14 HR – 10000 Zagreb Republic of Croatia e-mail: [email protected] Information Sheet on Ramsar Wetlands (RIS), page 2 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Bosnia and Herzegovina
    BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA Update: September 17th 2021 ^ l l l v. ZAGREB vers ZAGREB vers DARUVAR vers OSIJEK vers SOMBOR vers SUBOTICA l vers KIKINDA vers NASICE vers OSIJEK l l l D l l SUNJA A l I l l N I CROATIE ^ I I BOSNIE-HERZÉGOVINE NOVSKA I U I ZRENJANIN I ^ I VUKOVAR B I I I JASENOVAC ^ BACKA I I I I I HRVATSKA E I I I vers VRSAC OKUCANI I I KOSTAJNICA U NOVA GRADISKA VINKOVCI PALANKA I vers RIJEKA vers RIJEKA vers KARLOVAC vers ZAGREB na ^ SLAVONSKI Geography SA VRPOLJE NOVI SAD DUBICA ^ (Bosanska) V BROD NOVI VINODOLSKI Velika ^ E LUZANI (S ^ A ^ Kladusa Vrnograc Kostajnica Kozarska VA) Dubica (Bosanska)^ SLUNJ DVOR Brod SVILAJ SID NOVI SLANKAMEN Novi Grad Gradiska Srbac ^ Pecigrad (Bosanski Novi) PARC NAT. 45° ^ Kobas SENJ ^ KUZMIN ^ RAKOVICA Mrazovac KOZARA Gornji Novo Selo ^ RUMA STARA Î. Krk Trzac 2 Orasje Podgradci Derventa Odzak Samac PAZOVA Derventa ^ ^ Cazin SREMSKA Prijedor s ^ ^ 51,209 km² ^ Area: a a Podnovlje Ostrozac ^ Loncari RACA Un S Kozarac b n SREMSKA a i Modrica ^ a r PANCEVO PLITVICE r n V Laktasi k MITROVICA a ^ Prnjavor U OTOCAC ^ ja Bosanska a n ^ 1,543 km (Croatia 956 km, Montenegro Gradacac i E(Bosanska)^ Borders: n Bihac Kotorsko T V Klasnice D SMEDEREVO s Î. Rab Krupa ^ SA ^ 1209 Banja Luka o Brcko Raca B A Sanski Most Vrsani vers Ripac G REPUBLIKA SRPSKA a BELGRADE N VRELO 1480 Doboj n SA ^ ^ i Spionica Donja ^ V U 242 km, Serbia 345 km) r ^ E 1 m Bijeljina r B Lusci Palanka Dragalovci Gracanica D SABAC E ^ e Celinac c Srebrenik Vrtoce Vrhpolje V Spr r ^ e 20 km b c a a Ugljevik Coastline: ^ 917 Lopare NOVALJA n KotorKotor Klupe 3 j Tesanj OBRENOVAC Bosanski 1604 a Teslic Priboj Kulen Vakuf ^ VaVaroross KARLOBAG GOSPIC Velagici ^ Petrovac ^ PARC NAT.
    [Show full text]
  • Slobodan Praljak's Redacted Final Trial Brief
    IT-04-74-T 70305 D70305 - D70119 31 March 2011 SF THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL TRIBUNAL FOR THE FORMER YUGOSLAVIA Case No. IT-04-74-T Original: English TRIAL CHAMBER III Before: Judge Jean-Claude Antonetti, Presiding Judge Arpad Prandler Judge Stefan Trechsel Reserve Judge Antoine Kesia-Mbe Mindua Registrar: Mr. John Hocking Filed: 31 March 2011 THE PROSECUTOR v. JADRANKOPRLIĆ BRUNOSTOJIĆ SLOBODAN PRALJAK MILIVOJ PETKOVIĆ VALENTIN ČORIĆ BERISLAV PUŠIĆ REDACTED PUBLIC VERSION ____________________________________________________ SLOBODAN PRALJAK’S REDACTED FINAL TRIAL BRIEF ________________________________________________________ Office of the Prosecutor Counsel for Jadranko Prlić Counsel for Milivoj Petković Mr. Kenneth Scott Mr. Michael G. Karnavas Ms. Vesna Alaburić Mr. Douglas Stringer Ms. Suzana Tomanović Mr. Zoran Ivanišević Counsel for Bruno Stojić Counsel for Valentin Čorić Ms. Senka Nožica Ms. Dijana Tomašegović Tomić Mr. Karim A. A. Khan Mr. Dražen Plavec Counsel for Slobodan Praljak Counsel for Berislav Pušić Mr. Božidar Kovačić Mr. Fahrudin Ibrišimović Ms. Nika Pinter Mr. Roger Sahota 70304 - 2 - THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL TRIBUNAL FOR THE FORMER YUGOSLAVIA Case No. IT-04-74-T Prosecutor v. Jadranko Prlić at al SLOBODAN PRALJAK’S REDACTED FINAL TRIAL BRIEF 1. Pursuant to the Trial Chamber's instruction that all parties should submit a redacted, public draft of their final trial briefs before 1 April 2011, the Praljak Defence respectfully hereby submits a redacted version of Slobodan Praljak’s Final Trial Brief, incorporating corrigenda1 and redacting reference to all information that should not be made public to the best of its ability.2 Respectfully submitted, By Božidar Kovačić and Nika Pinter Counsel for the Accused Slobodan Praljak 1 The Prosecution noted apparent references to various documents not admitted in the initialdraft, generally due to typographical errors.
    [Show full text]
  • A New GIS Procedure for the Reconstruction of the Landscape in Classical Antiquity (Territory of Today Croatia)”
    Begović V., Schrunk I., Kereković D. (2011). The project “A new GIS procedure for the reconstruction of the landscape in classical antiquity (territory of today Croatia)”. In: D. Kereković, R. Źróbek (ed.). The Future with GIS. Croatian Information Technology Association – GIS Forum, University of Silesia, Zagreb, 82-93. THE PROJECT "A NEW GIS PROCEDURE FOR THE RECONSTRUCTION OF THE LANDSCAPE IN CLASSICAL ANTIQUITY (territory of today Croatia)" Vlasta Begović Institute of Archaeology Gajeva 32, 10 000 Zagreb, Croatia Ivančica Schrunk University of St. Thomas St. Paul, Minnesota 55105, USA Davorin Kereković GIS Forum Ilica 191 e, 10 000 Zagreb, Croatia Abstract In the course of the ongoing research project “Archaeological Topography of Croatia in Classical Antiquity” the application of a new GIS procedure made it possible to make reconstructions of some Roman sites and past landscapes (landscape in classical antiquity) on the territory of today Croatia. The GIS approach to the study of changes in historical landscapes indicated that the greatest transformation of the landscape occurred in the Roman period. Territorial creativity was high in the Roman time, when a completely new landscape identity appeared after the 2nd/1st century BC in Dalmatia and Histria, and after the 1st century AD in Pannonia. The new markers in the landscape consisted of: 1) Military camps; 2) Cities – colonies and settlements; 3) Roman villas; 4) A network of roads and aqueducts. Agro-forestry landscapes were unbalanced even in prehistory, with clearing of forests and expansion of agriculture. However, the most noticeable changes came in the Roman period with new exploitation of the land and the intensive planting of new cash crops - grape (vineyards) and olive trees in Dalmatia and Histria, and wheat and other cereals in Pannonia.
    [Show full text]